What Would Multiple Universes Mean? | Episode 507 | Closer To Truth

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Is there more than one universe? According to current cosmology, our entire gigantic universe is only one of innumerable universes, each universe like one tiny bubble in a limitless ocean of universes. What could all this mean? Featuring interviews with Max Tegmark, Anthony Aguirre, Alan Guth, Andrei Linde, and Paul Davies.
    Season 5, Episode 7 - #CloserToTruth
    ▶Register for free at CTT.com for subscriber-only exclusives: bit.ly/2GXmFsP
    Closer To Truth host Robert Lawrence Kuhn takes viewers on an intriguing global journey into cutting-edge labs, magnificent libraries, hidden gardens, and revered sanctuaries in order to discover state-of-the-art ideas and make them real and relevant.
    ▶Free access to Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: bit.ly/376lkKN
    Closer to Truth presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.
    #Multiverse #Cosmology

ความคิดเห็น • 291

  • @ivanzet4614
    @ivanzet4614 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    This is one of the most interesting channels on TH-cam in my opinion.

    • @ufotv-viral
      @ufotv-viral 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes 👌👽

    • @MandyFaddis
      @MandyFaddis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks for calling my attention to the channel. I would have just saved the video and probably forgotten to look at the channel itself and it definitely IS one of the most interesting channels on TH-cam.

  • @mhauser9457
    @mhauser9457 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Icelandic hot spring is definitely where I’d start going to do all my interviews!

    • @carolinedelisle589
      @carolinedelisle589 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Where did they put their camera and microphone?

    • @mhauser9457
      @mhauser9457 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@carolinedelisle589 trade secret!

    • @Anytyme06
      @Anytyme06 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or the springs in Japan in the fall.

  • @TactileTherapy
    @TactileTherapy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    The amount of content on this channel is insane. Cant wait to cite it as one of my favorite youtube channels when speaking from a panel
    I use many of the scientists interviewed throughout this series in my novels

    • @darioinfini
      @darioinfini 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      True. This man has been digging deep for some time. Philosophy, cosmology, theology, metaphysics. He's a depth whisperer.

    • @ktx49
      @ktx49 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yup I remember finding & bookmarking the Closer to Truth website at least 10-15 years ago...well before TH-cam's popularity. I remember it used a really clunky embedded video player.

    • @weilunkang
      @weilunkang 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What are your novels, can you give us a preview? When are they gonna be published? And, what is your actual author name so that we can keep an eye out?

    • @TactileTherapy
      @TactileTherapy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@weilunkang Of course. It's a series entitled Tactile Therapy: Volume One and Adjunct. There are two books already out. The story is an action adventure/ sci-fi that follows six individuals recovering from the asteroid that's going to swing by Earth in the year 2029. Its filled with science and philosophy. You can check it out on amazon or simply google the title
      www.amazon.com/Durell-Arrington/e/B0794C2MV8

    • @weilunkang
      @weilunkang 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TactileTherapy Cool, thanks !

  • @kenowens9021
    @kenowens9021 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    There is only one universe, the physical universe. But, within the Cosmos there is the physical Universe and the invisible spirit world together.

  • @topguntk870
    @topguntk870 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    man one day i wish i can talk about the multiverse while swimming too. how cool are these guys!

  • @danielpaulson8838
    @danielpaulson8838 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow. Love the new production, music great audio on this one.

  • @dottedrhino
    @dottedrhino 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    They should stop showing animations of galaxies when they are talking about universes - make an animation - the channel deserves it!

    • @Vikingocazar
      @Vikingocazar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it’s a bit tricky to conceptualize and then animate that which is the subject of debate.... I’m literally trying to picture the great mystery in my mind and cannot come up with a tangible model...

  • @gregedgerton3390
    @gregedgerton3390 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "Cosmology" - the study of how long it takes before you need drugs.

  • @Dion_Mustard
    @Dion_Mustard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I like the idea of universes going back eternally hence never a "beginning" to existence..each with their own different laws..perhaps different life forms..that would exclude god in a sense..but it wouldn't exclude eternal consciousness..or an afterlife...
    FASCINATING VIDEO! My favourite so far :)

  • @meows_and_woof
    @meows_and_woof 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    This is the first time I’ve seen so many shirtless physicists at once😄

    • @ScientificReview
      @ScientificReview 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nude Physics: When Quantum Physics Interweave with Cosmological Physics

  • @os2171
    @os2171 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    19:35 PowerBook G4? When was this interview recorded?

  • @JungleJargon
    @JungleJargon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Appealing to infinite possibilities (universes) is an appeal to a physical god without accounting for where the power or energy is coming from.

  • @MartinHeine77
    @MartinHeine77 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great episode, is there a making of?

  • @jackieswan422
    @jackieswan422 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The physical and natural.. you are here today and tomorrow you will be in another universe... I believe that is how things go

    • @TheConqueror009
      @TheConqueror009 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Nope you'll still be in this one just many different carbon atoms spaced out in between each other.

    • @ktx49
      @ktx49 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheConqueror009 damn man you're like the Grinch who stole multiverses 😉

  • @benjamingamrekeli1578
    @benjamingamrekeli1578 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    No way they were in the water doing the interview 😂

  • @jayjames7055
    @jayjames7055 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    if these universes are 'separated by time and space' they may be consecutive rather than concurrent as per roger penrose.

    • @aryaahmadi4029
      @aryaahmadi4029 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Which explains why we aren't experiencing them all at once. I think you're on to something.

  • @andrewturpin3977
    @andrewturpin3977 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    wonderful

  • @solapowsj25
    @solapowsj25 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Some start with zero or nothing. Others are surrounded by everything, infinite, unimaginable.

    • @solapowsj25
      @solapowsj25 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FelixBat In my small Research Center, I use a simple method to study force physics. It's the turbo-gyro-oscillation rule. Always works well, from zero to the infinite or unknown. 😊

  • @kevanhubbard9673
    @kevanhubbard9673 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like that one 'shadows of infinity'.

  • @CrystalTwinStar
    @CrystalTwinStar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have the biggest crush on Max and it has lasted since I first discovered him many years ago! Lol

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Multiple universes could mean cosmic inflation exists outside this universe as eternal inflation, and perhaps dark energy as well.

    • @donkique956
      @donkique956 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      My thought exactly.

  • @tedgrant2
    @tedgrant2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The idea that there are multiple universes is dividing us.

  • @maxnullifidian
    @maxnullifidian 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Davies has a very good point!

  • @bobtimster62
    @bobtimster62 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You did not mention Alex Vilenkin's (Tufts) original ideas of eternal inflation.

  • @cardquest2118
    @cardquest2118 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m just imagining the cameraman in the hot spring with them 😂

  • @frankyjayhay
    @frankyjayhay 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In another universe I discovered multiple universes are real and am lauded for it. I am astounded by my own greatness, I am not the nobody people say I am, well done me.

    • @ferdinandkraft857
      @ferdinandkraft857 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You are very special, just like everybody else.

    • @shawnparker1207
      @shawnparker1207 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      the vivid dreams are seemingly proof of possilble other realities
      or if someone is serving in tennis for set point and misses in another universe is made i have been out and about many times feeling people places and things being quite different just so hard to prove

  • @DSAK55
    @DSAK55 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In and out, 20 minutes adventure

  • @imshadi
    @imshadi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As much as I believe in the multiverse theory, Paul Davies's argument, that by invoking everything you explain nothing is extremely powerful. Multiverse theory must work on probing other realities to see if we can detect them from inside this universe. I believe that when we see an interference pattern in a double slit experiment, we might be seeing the influence of parallel histories affecting the motion of the one particle we can see, so maybe there is a way to peer into those other realities or finding other ways in which patterns affect us. In the end, not all explanations are exactly equivalent.

  • @utsavkc3946
    @utsavkc3946 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In which dimension(s) are the multiple universes separated?

  • @jeremymr
    @jeremymr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    6:00 - Robert Lawrence 𝐒 𝐖 𝐈 𝐌 𝐌
    7:15 - What is Robert doing to Bob Ross' beard?? :D

    • @N12458
      @N12458 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is an r rated version of this very talk out there.

  • @louisbullard6135
    @louisbullard6135 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like Paul Davies and if I was a betting Man my money is on him. It really is just good old Common Sense actually as he didn’t even have to use big hard to understand words to get his Excellent point across. I mean you can’t explain infinite Universe’s when you still have so many unanswered questions about the one we live in. I just don’t see how you can disagree with a word he said. He is spot on with the Religion Analogy!!!!!

  • @StuntmanDan03
    @StuntmanDan03 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    im glad psychists are sharing their theories with us instead of keeping them in their journals untouched by a strangers eyes

    • @ferdinandkraft857
      @ferdinandkraft857 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Psychists?

    • @wakeandbakewithmaryjane1767
      @wakeandbakewithmaryjane1767 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I get what you meant and agree ! Fascinating to know how they think and evaluate and share information we would never know as common folks.

  • @brookeoneill1850
    @brookeoneill1850 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'd bet a lot of money that Andre Linde and his wife have the highest combined IQ of any married couple in the world.

  • @darioinfini
    @darioinfini 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I bet in 100 years we're going to look back on what we thought we understood happens in the first 10^-37th of a second 13.7 billion years ago and chuckle at the quaintness of our notions.
    But like the futurist I am, I'm confident today that we have no remote clue what happened then.

    • @Tom_Quixote
      @Tom_Quixote 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What makes you think we'll progress? We don't chuckle today at what Einstein said 100 years ago.

    • @darioinfini
      @darioinfini 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Tom_Quixote We might chuckle 100 years from now. Or a 1000 years. You think we "got it right now"? We can close the science shops because we figured it all out?

  • @janethayes5941
    @janethayes5941 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In a multiverse I'm all the things I'm not in this one.

  • @SpacePonder
    @SpacePonder 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why's that? 15:58? That looking at the quantum, you can see far away?

  • @KeepiTCawl
    @KeepiTCawl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's weird to think there could be another version of me watching another version of this video at the same time

    • @donkique956
      @donkique956 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      In that universe they're in steamy mud pits.

    • @valleyken
      @valleyken 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe on an ad-free TH-cam ? 😀

  • @imshadi
    @imshadi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question: Is Eternal Inflation based on Quantum Theory or Relativity, or does it have elements of both?

  • @ajjs2011
    @ajjs2011 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    "What Would Multiple Universes Mean" is kind of basic question now, but "What Would Multiple multiverses Mean" is more intriguing.

  • @ameralbadry6825
    @ameralbadry6825 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I agree with the last scientist

  • @MartinHeine77
    @MartinHeine77 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I though about this a lot, it means one tree maybe different in a different universe but a tree won’t just burst into fire randomly in one just to be different. Hope that analogy makes sense. It think infinite causes turned out that are probable, I like this guy, also I believe this more than god
    Cool hot spring!
    Much easier to listen to this guy, I think cause it’s based on maths I can understand it
    I like how he categorised it into 4 types he went a bit further that I did, I like the classification of the types
    Also a great question, how large are we yeah

  • @freemindoverleaningheart226
    @freemindoverleaningheart226 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was wondering why is it that most of your videos are 26;46 long Bob?

    • @cosmikrelic4815
      @cosmikrelic4815 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think they maybe made for TV?

  • @danielpaulson8838
    @danielpaulson8838 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I believe there is likely life on other planets. I have no problem considering there may be universes or dimensions beyond what we can see and sense.

  • @chyfields
    @chyfields 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder if it is the multiverse that we exist within?
    I sense layer upon layer of venn diagram style universes co-creating to form matter that is sufficiently dense to experience physicality.
    A body of water consists of many different yet interdependent bonds.

  • @mikefoster5277
    @mikefoster5277 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What would multiple universes mean? They would mean that you're very likely consuming an illegal substance.

    • @TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns
      @TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not illegal everywhere...

    • @ezbody
      @ezbody 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns
      At least, not ilegal in every Universe.

  • @leswilk1601
    @leswilk1601 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So have the Buddhists got it right with their reincarnation theory ?

    • @aryaahmadi4029
      @aryaahmadi4029 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's also what christianity refers to with the idea of eternal life is the idea of Infinite iterations of consciousness, I think.

  • @scoots8519
    @scoots8519 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    From learning how to stand upright and pick bananas with a stick 1 million years ago to this. Not bad homo sapiens.

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would a multiverse have something to do with start of time as past, present and future?

    • @xtratub
      @xtratub 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only in universe where exists definite arrow of time possible to think about time. Other universe not so luck.

  • @stinkertoy4310
    @stinkertoy4310 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    First time i’ve seen RLK tip his hand. When he adds “about a million times in a row”. Yup. Something weird going on.

  • @igolfjtweetler4097
    @igolfjtweetler4097 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's Marty McFly from 2050.

  • @freemindoverleaningheart226
    @freemindoverleaningheart226 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    More seriously Dr Kuhn, here is my take: What would happen if we circle the earth with a rope , strong and large enough to exert a pulling force so as to derail the earth from its orbit,? Will fine-tuning constants still hold? Would life on earth still be possible?

    • @ezbody
      @ezbody 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most definitely, yes. Or, perhaps, no way.

    • @cosmikrelic4815
      @cosmikrelic4815 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You call this being more serious?

  • @realpqleur
    @realpqleur 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting, have they figured out what kind of monkey evolved in other places?

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could many worlds exist in different dimensions of space?

  • @chd1694
    @chd1694 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Multiple universes?? Hopefully my other half is super duper rich 🤑

  • @robertowences9002
    @robertowences9002 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Means we going to love and no to hurts

  • @richardventus1875
    @richardventus1875 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's becoming increasingly believable that the universe itself is conscious and brings about reality as it desires under the cloak of 'chance and probability'. This is what Problacists believe (see Problacism.com).

    • @anthony7960
      @anthony7960 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If our small bodies can be conscious, why can’t something vast like the universe be conscious? I could see it.

    • @richardventus1875
      @richardventus1875 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@anthony7960 - yes - even the simplest rock contains GigaJoules of energy and bends spacetime but nobody has a clue how it does it!

  • @thePlum
    @thePlum 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    🇮🇸 shoutout Iceland

  • @mike-Occslong
    @mike-Occslong ปีที่แล้ว

    Bit of a weird setting for a science talk lol

  • @jean-pierredevent970
    @jean-pierredevent970 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I keep thinking about a parallel universe that differs only extremely little and even looks the same too. Would all these universes springing into existence and who are the same not spontaneously nest adjacent in a higher spatial dimension?. Then gradually going further you would meet more and more differences until the universe becomes unrecognizable and perhaps only very "far away" a new universe with life would pop up which again started to change. This idea is a little bit like walking in shadows of the Zelazny Amber serie of course. But I wonder too if the passage of time can't be considered as traveling through the multiverse.

    • @donkique956
      @donkique956 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What!?

    • @jean-pierredevent970
      @jean-pierredevent970 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@donkique956 Amber is pure fantasy but there the parallel worlds seem to lay "next to each other" like pages in a multidimensional book.Zelazny is very inspiring.rpggeek.com/rpgsetting/19213/amber-multiverse

  • @nathb3315
    @nathb3315 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Will they ever discover multiverses ? Is my big question!!

  • @JungleJargon
    @JungleJargon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You can't charge your cell phone from an equal or lesser amount of energy... energy always comes from a greater source.

    • @occultninja4
      @occultninja4 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you actually understand Quantum Mechanics? The many worlds interpretation is based on an implicstion that falls right out of Quantum Mechanics, which is provable and testable.
      As for whether or not it solves anything, it resolves the issue of wave function collapse, as well as everything else quantum mechanics already solved and explained.
      If your hang-up is where the energy for those "extra" universes is coming from, I don't know about your understanding of the theory. I think that when you hear "when the wave function branches it creates a new universe" as it literally big banging another universe into existence or something. I'd say consult videos by Sean Carrol to better understand what is meant about wave functions branching a universe. I think the easiest way to think about it is that wave function branching is all inside the same multiverse, and the big bang created that multiverse.
      However as far as multiple big bangs leading to multiple different quantum miltiverses. Here thermodynamics is kind of awkward to try to apply, because thermodynamics and it's laws are based on observations *inside* of *our* universe as with all other universes. You have to make the claim that there is no possible universe where specifically the laws of thermodynamics do not apply which might be a stretch. And also make the claim that it applies even outside of the universe or under the conditions before a universe exists. That gets a bit awkward and presumptuous.
      But even aside from that, we know about virtual particles and how they can become real near the edge of a black hole (they spontaneously manifest in equal and opposite pairs and usually immediately cancel each other out for a net 0), and we know the unviverse is expanding. A consequence of the above is that when the universe has expanded to the point where virtual particles spontaneously manifest so far apart that they don't get a chance to immediately annihilate each-other (like what happens near the edge of black holes, one falls in and the other escapes) then you get something that looks like big bang conditions where suddenly a bunch of matter is manifesting out of seemingly nowhere.
      Where is that matter and energy coming from? The random vaccume fluctuations of quantum fields. That's what creates virtual particles. AKA you must consult Quantum Mechanics again. Basically a quantum field can never be at an absolute 0 state.
      It is weird though xD and it definitely has it's problems. But I don't think your takes on it are the best most well informed takes. If many worlds somehow violated thermodynamics in a way that was relevant, it wouldn't be taken seriously, and your assertion that energy flows from higher to lower is an appeal to thermodynamics.

    • @JungleJargon
      @JungleJargon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rinkamime Thanks for your response. It's the formation of matter that quantifies time and distance but can matter exist without the dilation of time and space? How much matter is required? Isn't it all the singularities and super massive gravitational wells that hold the universe together? It seems like a case of all or none. Atoms themselves are bound up packets of energy. 20 some of the most common elements, combined packets of energy, are functional parts, EACH ONE essential for life. (20 of them!) An equal amount (20 some) of other common elements are beneficial to life. The instruction for life isn't even a physical thing. It's a concatenation of a molecule (the ordering of elements) that is various unique written commands or programming that result(s) in different living organisms that fight entropy for a while, spawning new generations by command. How can you even believe or think there isn't a very wise intelligent powerful cause for everything that we see and consciously experience? It is the very definition of God to be all knowing, all powerful and the cause of everything there is (the God of gods). The goat herders 🐐 were able to understand that 😳💥🙄‼️😆🤣😂 so what is your problem? 🙄🙄🙄🙂😁 Logic and math required for the formation of matter and programming etc???❓❓❓That is the proof of God.💥‼️ 🤔 Everything requires energy... from God.

    • @occultninja4
      @occultninja4 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JungleJargon It's not all singularities and supermassive black holes that hold the universe together, it's not quite so simple unfortunately xD Like, Baryonic matter (what makes up us, life, stars and planets and black holes) doesn't account for all the mass and energy in the universe that we know is out there. In fact it's in the minority. See, Dark Matter.
      As for the intelligent design thing. I can respect it, it's just that I mire subscribe to the theory of evolution where life happened as a result of complex chemical and envirornmental phenomena and then certain types of life were selected for or against by the envirornment. With this paradigm, given that we know the vast majority of species that have ever lived went extinct before humans even existed, it's awkward to think that an intelligent being deliverately made that happen, literally designed life, only for the vast majority of it to die out and go extinct due to no fault of humanity but instead to selection pressure from the envirornment.
      It's just really awkward to reconcile those things so I wouldn't write subscribe to the intelligent design argument but I won't knock you for it because it does have a simple understanding to it.
      That said I don't intend to prove that there isn't a God or Necessary Being or such. It's just that it's awkward to reconcile that with observations we make about the world unless you come to some very radical conclusions about the nature of that being.
      But regardless, it's interesting stuff, and glad this channel brings people like us together to think about these things! Needless to say I'm not quite a part of the Theology camp and am more of a guest but I've learned a thing or 2 from this channel and it's community.

    • @JungleJargon
      @JungleJargon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@occultninja4 Evolution is silly. Dark matter assumes too many things since too little is known.

  • @eyebee-sea4444
    @eyebee-sea4444 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    No troubles with customers, travelling to conferences around the world, get paid for speculating about the universe, giving interviews in hot springs... I definitely choose the wrong professional career.

  • @valleyken
    @valleyken 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There is no "you in other universes". If you are not aware of their thoughts, it's just "other people". If their life or universe differs in certain aspects, they are just different people. It might be fun to think that in some other universe you might be rich or handsome. But who came up with the stupid idea that it's "you" instead of just other creatures ?

  • @HouseJawn
    @HouseJawn ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is Max's head yellow in the hot springs?

  • @george627
    @george627 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    There may or may not be Multi-verses, but how can space not be infinite?

    • @donkique956
      @donkique956 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The space that holds our universe is indeed infinite.

  • @lightlightism
    @lightlightism หลายเดือนก่อน

    Alan Guth will honor the Nobel Prize and not be honored by such prize.

  • @SpatioTemporalEntity
    @SpatioTemporalEntity 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's called Scale.

  • @sethanon6778
    @sethanon6778 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's proven that this guys can swim 😅

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    A multiverse would likely mean start of this universe was at least partly scientific.

  • @CANNIBoy
    @CANNIBoy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If space goes on ad infinitum out from us, it too must go on ad infinitum within us. Dimensions so big, and so small, that we cannot conceive of them, in our universe. But likewise, any conscious matter on those scales would be unable to conceive or detect our own finite area of space we occupy. Trippy. We could be just one of a near infinite number of universes tucked within one another like Russian dolls 🪆

  • @chrisgreen8803
    @chrisgreen8803 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍👍

  • @matishakabdullah5874
    @matishakabdullah5874 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Imagination of multiple(infinite nos) parallel or non-parallel verse is illogically absurd of absolute order!
    First if one subscribes to big bang one has to start with infinite nos physically indeterminate states of singularities(if they were merged then only one) then to expand (in fact resulting overcrowded spacetime with cosmic eggs with no where to expand if there were infinite no of singularities, and effectively may cause early collapse and merging into a single expanding entity. this may explain the early "inflation" if there was bigbang at all) them (in indeterminate states because no one knew anything about the status outside the universe,) to infinite no of indeterminate end/horizon of infinite nos of spaces (if they are not merged into a single universal space time). One shall end up with (infinity minus 1) indeterminate verses( in theory) while one mind is hanging between two infinite singularities - the singularity of the beginning and singularity of the end,/horizon...(converging realities)!
    One mind can imagine anything.... but one imagination has yet to explain how and why from singularly no space(absolutely nothing) was becoming a universal space for universal events to have occured or going to occur
    and one can't explain how and what made one mind that can imagine both... that is without certainty end...and that is with certainty end ...
    and that leads us to the fact or the truth.... that ....with all commendable achievements modern science ... it is still at the stage of a reality under construction or works in progress... yet to come to TRUTH end ....it can be obsolete by tomorrow or near future ... today human flies with plane but can be yesterday to tomorrow generations with GM Engineering wings ... similar thing can happen to scientific theories...?
    In alQuranic cosmological perspective the today cosmological discourses and observations are still not further then the lowest heaven space...far far below from the seventh heaven at the horizon of human universe....and yet that isn't the end alQuranic cosmological discourse!
    AlQuran is the Truth ...and it challenges anyone to prove otherwise!
    (I only offer alQuranic believer perspective...I hope no harm is done. And the Podcast Author doesn't mind.)

  • @SpacePonder
    @SpacePonder 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    so, basically, fractals?

  • @seattleitefpv
    @seattleitefpv 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Paul Davies is rejecting the multiverse, but does he have any alternative explanation to the apparent finetuning of the supposed one and only universe?

    • @louisbullard6135
      @louisbullard6135 ปีที่แล้ว

      The earth was not fine tuned to Accommodate people and everything around us. Everyone and Everything evolved over time from the change in our weather and placement in the solar system.

  • @Music_Creativity_Science
    @Music_Creativity_Science 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting subject, but...
    - Then another universe exists in which every electron has moved and will move exactly like in this universe for a zillion years. Except for one of the electrons, which deviated a little bit for a micro-second.
    - Then another universe exists in which every life form has behaved and will behave exactly like in this universe for a zillion years. Except for me now, farting in this universe.
    And all combinations of minor deviations of every behavior of every object then exist as a specific universe.... which makes the probability for anything = 1
    Nah, don't think so.
    Infinity rule in mathematics: ∞ + 1 = ∞
    Subtract infinity (∞) from both sides of the equation, and you get... 1 = 0
    Nah, don't think so, no real physical infinities in any form (space volmues, number of universes/objects, number of events) even if something "always" has existed. Imo, then number of changes and events go towards infinity, but never reaches it, it can not be reached.

    • @bozo5632
      @bozo5632 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There may not be an infinitely many, but there could be an indefinite / endlessly growing number. It could double every Planck second, without ending, and never violate your distaste for physical infinities.
      It does seem like a lot of hassle though, just to make some people's math work out. "All the smart people are wrong" seems more likely to me - at least that possibility has infinite (rimshot) precedent.

    • @Music_Creativity_Science
      @Music_Creativity_Science 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bozo5632 "There may not be an infinitely many, but there could be an indefinite / endlessly growing number. It could double every Planck second, without ending, and never violate your distaste for physical infinities."
      Could be, but as we seem to agree, it is not and never physical infinity. The physicist George Ellis, for example, explains this very well in several TH-cam videos.

  • @hermannrueppell508
    @hermannrueppell508 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When the blind talk about colors.

  • @holgerjrgensen2166
    @holgerjrgensen2166 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What would multiple universes mean ? -
    If You knew the principle of universes, You would Not ask such question,
    You're blinded by the 'macro-univers' as You looks at from within, and dont have a clue of what You see, this is a very narrow understanding of what a universe is.
    But your physical body consists of a series of universes, so think about this, when you're in the middle of rush-hour.
    And try if You can see the Living, behind the Beings.

  • @ktx49
    @ktx49 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    God is Santa Clause for adult theists. Multiverses are Santa Clause(s) for adult atheists. Where's my Nobel prize?

    • @marccas10
      @marccas10 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your not getting it, you are on the naughty list!

  • @dadaimiza
    @dadaimiza 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    😍🙏

  • @JungleJargon
    @JungleJargon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where is all the energy coming from?

    • @belablasco6681
      @belablasco6681 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe the energy is an expression of some underlying, eternal principle, a nothingness that expands infinitely.

  • @patricksee10
    @patricksee10 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Robert, you didn’t speak about the universe that makes all other universes unable to be, unable to exist. Surely one of the mathematical outcomes of the multiverse theory is such a universe? Which universe do you think that might be?

  • @colinp2238
    @colinp2238 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If we are able to be in two places at once then time travel could be possible?

  • @elliott614
    @elliott614 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isn't the "universe" theory (vs multiverse) less reasonable? Comparable to MONO-theism?
    I don't buy fine tuning necessarily. Maybe it'd take longer for dark energy's effects to make life hospitable (or less long). Maybe a different generation of fundamental particles would constitute stable matter. Perhaps there are many different configurations for different types of matter and life to happen.

  • @mildanimal5967
    @mildanimal5967 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You mean: what do they mean? !

  • @michaelrichmond3315
    @michaelrichmond3315 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My mind is blown two of us can exist at one time we can be in two places at 1 time like an electron. WTF

  • @zachbaker5259
    @zachbaker5259 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I stand stoned by the reach of reality

  • @nickidaisyreddwoodd5837
    @nickidaisyreddwoodd5837 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The multiverse theory seems reasonable.

  • @alankuntz4406
    @alankuntz4406 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah it means we're all going to jump into a big Jacuzzi hot tub together haha
    . Below the surface of the water there's a another universe and dimension and it's inflating. 🤪

  • @titusfrankpatrick
    @titusfrankpatrick 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So ,in a infinite amount of universes, with a infinite amount of possibilities, is a possibility that this universe was created by a been, all powerful outside our universe, in other words a been from other universe created our universe, he or she or any gender you can choose can control everything from this universe, again is possible in a infinite amount of possibilities, make sense right.??

  • @rafeller9057
    @rafeller9057 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Please! Tegmark needs to take a vacation and eat some magic mushrooms. Then he might develop a theory that makes sense. Multiple universes are an oxymoron.

    • @1099670
      @1099670 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why?

    • @rafeller9057
      @rafeller9057 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@1099670 well it wouldn't be the first time I've been wrong, but I'm very suspicious of cosmologists making up new theories to support an older "discovery". To use multiverses to explain an expanding, accelerating universe, makes me think of "how many angels can dance on the head of a pin" justifications. Of course realistically these guys need funding and grants and they can't just sit around and go well let's just wait for the science to give us the answer let's just start making up stuff and write in papers. So that's suspicious to me. I'm glad somebody's out there thinking about it, and knows the math and physics, but I'm not sure we're really ready to come up with a definitive answer that justifies multiple universes.

    • @belablasco6681
      @belablasco6681 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The word "universe" was coined to include "all there is" but what if that is separated into bubbles of inflating space with infinite distances between them so that after branching off they never again interact? The only alternative is that our universe is a finite are with an outside edge suspended in -- what? Nothingness?

    • @rafeller9057
      @rafeller9057 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@belablasco6681 this could go back and forth for quite a while, but the truth is I don't really understand the nature of the universe and all that exists. Although, I do not believe that the only alternatives are bubble universes or a finite universe hanging like snow globe in nothingness.

    • @belablasco6681
      @belablasco6681 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rafeller9057 The most commonly accepted scenario among cosmologists today is of an eternal inflation continually producing Big Bangs separated by infinities of space resulting in an ever-increasing number of bubble universes, and this may have been happening forever.

  • @JungleJargon
    @JungleJargon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's the formation of matter that quantifies time and distance but can matter exist without the dilation of time and space? How much matter is required? Isn't it all the singularities and super massive gravitational wells that hold the universe together? It seems like a case of all or none. Atoms themselves are bound up packets of energy. 20 some of the most common elements, combined packets of energy, are functional parts, EACH ONE essential for life. (20 of them!) An equal amount (20 some) of other common elements are beneficial to life. The instruction for life isn't even a physical thing. It's a concatenation of a molecule (the ordering of elements) that is various unique written commands or programming that result(s) in different living organisms that fight entropy for a while, spawning new generations by command. How can you even believe or think there isn't a very wise intelligent powerful cause for everything that we see and consciously experience? It is the very definition of God to be all knowing, all powerful and the cause of everything there is (the God of gods). The goat herders 🐐 were able to understand that 😳💥🙄‼️😆🤣😂 so what is your problem? 🙄🙄🙄🙂😁 Logic and math required for the formation of matter and programming etc???❓❓❓That is the proof of God.💥‼️ 🤔

    • @ferdinandkraft857
      @ferdinandkraft857 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is actually evidence _against_ god.

    • @JungleJargon
      @JungleJargon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ferdinandkraft857 Thanks for proving nothing.

  • @ramaraksha01
    @ramaraksha01 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The way I think of Parallel Universes is that they would all be different - in some universes there is life, like ours, other universes are dead universes. Life in other universes might be totally different - maybe silicon based, the laws would be totally different - we would not be able to exist in those universes
    But I bet there is no universe where God is a Sugar Daddy catering to the pleasures of the flesh of billions of old dead people just sitting about/snoring away/chatting/sitting/floating about staring at each other
    Every time I ask a theist - one does one DO in Heaven? They run away
    Do they think of their loved ones down on earth? They might be suffering/starving/homeless/crying/jobless/abused/beaten/tortured? Does being in Heaven mean not caring anymore?
    No one asks such questions because that would make religious leaders uncomfortable
    The media, the Philosophers & the educated complicit and keeping the Ponzi-scheme of Heaven going

    • @patmoran5339
      @patmoran5339 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed, "heaven" would be hell. We live to explain and to solve problems. A non-problematic environment would be a hell of monotony. Monotony would extinguish the human mind.

    • @ramaraksha01
      @ramaraksha01 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@patmoran5339 Heaven IS here -basically these people want an easy lazy life - nothing to do, no worries all the while shamelessly sponging off a Sugar Daddy God
      Well, that is the life of a Dog! It's master feeds, protects, shelters and cares for it - zero work or responsibilities or worries - Heaven!
      Fools Chasing after Fools Gold get what they deserve

    • @patmoran5339
      @patmoran5339 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ramaraksha01 I think that might be true for a tiny, tiny minority of people. I believe that the overwhelming majority are not like that at all. Most of the people who are "fools" could be easily convinced that there is a better way given the right knowledge with good presentation of the facts that we live in the most peaceful and prosperous time in the history of human existence and that there are no upper limits on the value of human ideas.

    • @ramaraksha01
      @ramaraksha01 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@patmoran5339 Not one asks - What exactly do we DO in Heaven? NOT ONE! We are going to spend eternity there - what do we do there? Chat about? All the talk is about how we will meet our loved ones and then what? What do we do on a daily basis?
      Religions don't like that question because they have no answers
      The question is more difficult than it looks
      If they say we work, ok what kind of work? What work does the All-Might God is engaged in? Running factories making widgets that get exported to the universe next door?
      So that's out and we end up with billions of lazy bums sitting about/snoring away for eternity!
      And this is the Grand Plan of God?
      Clearly anyone with an ounce of intelligence can see that this is just a fantasy being peddled by religions
      And the frightening thing is the silence - the media, the educated NOT asking question knowing that religious people don't like such questions to be asked
      And so they are complicit in keeping this ponzi-scheme going
      And such ponzi-schemes have killed innocent people - like that young teacher beheaded in France
      The hands of the educated, media, the philosopher and the moral are stained with the blood of innocents

    • @patmoran5339
      @patmoran5339 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ramaraksha01 You might want to think about this too. The group of people who recoil from the idea of prolonging the average life-span to say, maybe 150 years or more through the advances in medical science, is rejected by these same people. In other words, they are OK with immortality as long as it is their god who provides it.

  • @ramaraksha01
    @ramaraksha01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I don't get at 23:00 with Paul Davies - where does God come in? God has nothing to do with a Multi-verse
    We are one life form - there are other life forms
    We live in this one earth - yep there are other earths
    We have our sun - yep quite a lot of other suns
    We have our Galaxy - quite a lot of other galaxies
    Well the Universe is just one more step further
    We can't test for them now does not mean we should not think of them

    • @cosmikrelic4815
      @cosmikrelic4815 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He is merely saying that if multiverses can't be seen then it is no better theory than god. They are both outside.

    • @ramaraksha01
      @ramaraksha01 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cosmikrelic4815 But a multiverse is just a bigger idea than a galaxy
      We are one life form - but we know there are other life forms
      One earth, but we are starting to find earths similar to ours
      Our sun, but there are billions of suns out there
      Our galaxy, again billions of galaxies
      It is just expanding our view
      Why is the universe so fine-tuned for life?
      It is because it is just one of many - some are dead - some have different life forms
      But God is just a fantasy - some magic being with incredible powers made all this? How did he pop up? Is he the only one?
      Are there other Gods with incredible powers?
      We have yet to encounter even one!
      We can start saying Superman, wonder woman exist as well
      But we don't because unlike God - they are not Sugar Daddies - someone who will nicely keep us in cozy comfort for eternity if we just beg & grovel to the "right" God!

    • @cosmikrelic4815
      @cosmikrelic4815 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ramaraksha01 actually we don't know if there are other life forms.

    • @ramaraksha01
      @ramaraksha01 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cosmikrelic4815 The idea is that we are not unique - that is crazy to think that way. If life can be seeded here, it can be seeded in other planets as well - the conditions have to be just right that's all
      To me it is crazy to think we are the only planet on which life came to be & the rest of the galaxy is all dead planets
      Just doesn't make any sense

    • @cosmikrelic4815
      @cosmikrelic4815 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ramaraksha01 I agree that it is likely but you said "we know" and we don't.

  • @TheRealBozz
    @TheRealBozz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does this mean there is a universe where Magic is real!? ...

    • @randysteele6741
      @randysteele6741 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If it's real, it isn't magic.

    • @TheRealBozz
      @TheRealBozz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@randysteele6741 If there are an infinite number of universes, then there is a pretty good chance that one of them has something akin to magic. The point being that both theories are ridiculous and unproven and in all likelihood will never be observed.

  • @merlynschutterle7242
    @merlynschutterle7242 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How can there be an infinite number of anything? If there are numbers of anything then there can't be infinite numbers. If anything can exist, it can be counted.

    • @magdapumnea646
      @magdapumnea646 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      .....and if you ad 1 to a known # it bicomes bigger.....and you can add 1 to ANY # ,....of anything.

    • @mikefoster5277
      @mikefoster5277 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Exactly, and this simple truth is so obvious and fundamental, it is literally shocking how so many otherwise intelligent people just don't seem to get it. In reality, there can only be one infinity, and that single infinity must be all inclusive and contain everything in existence. In other words, if you postulate multiple universes, then how is the singular infinity affected? It isn't!

    • @ferdinandkraft857
      @ferdinandkraft857 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What about space and time? They could be continuous, and therefore uncountable infinite in any interval.

  • @alexciocca4451
    @alexciocca4451 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It don’t mean nothing cause even if you could travel infinitely fast you could never catch up with your other self I knew this when I was 15

  • @keplerthe3399
    @keplerthe3399 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is my theory without numbers or letters on the expansion of the universe, it's one universe creating more of itself.
    [ ] -> I [] [ ] [ ] [ ] [->

  • @JungleJargon
    @JungleJargon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A miltiverse doesn't solve anything.

    • @donkique956
      @donkique956 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      True, but a dictionary will.

    • @JungleJargon
      @JungleJargon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      KoldCerealKiller You believe in magical dictionaries now?

  • @douglasparise3986
    @douglasparise3986 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your show. I too am consumed by these profound questions. But after all these years it seems that there are no definitive answers. Like the search for bigfoot. Around in endless circles. No closer to truth

    • @ferdinandkraft857
      @ferdinandkraft857 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Asking questions move us closer to truth. Answers tend to halt our journey.

    • @patmoran5339
      @patmoran5339 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ferdinandkraft857 Actually, the solutions to problems usually are accompanied by more problems. Fortunately, we will never run out of problems. All solutions are temporary victories. We make the swiftest progress when we create better problems. There is no ultimate truth.

  • @ronholfly
    @ronholfly 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Multiple troubles and problems.