I really appreciated this! Thanks a lot. Will use these ideas when I code my own distortion. It would have been nice if there were sound examples in the talk but I know that would be a ton of work
I’ve watched most of this talk at least 4 times now, but never make it to the end because I get too inspired to start working on something before I can finish.
Fast math approximations already exist in many forms unsure why you had to invent these with your buddy. I would have liked to see a comparison of the actual code execution times for various math approximations and built in c++ libraries with examples. Also a comparison of the separate techniques and there execute times. Good presentation just wish it had more of the technical code explanation affirmation of why your process is choice . Thx
yes, that was what i was thinking. Would be nice to see the differences and comparisons and how it is faster to use their method instead. Maybe the biggest advantage in their implementation is that it is already in the framework so less things to link and perhaps make trouble at the end?
I really appreciated this! Thanks a lot. Will use these ideas when I code my own distortion. It would have been nice if there were sound examples in the talk but I know that would be a ton of work
OMG I love stuff like this!
Picked up quite a bit from this talk!
Great talk!
I’ve watched most of this talk at least 4 times now, but never make it to the end because I get too inspired to start working on something before I can finish.
Amazing maannnnn
Great overview of very interesting material!
Thanks man. Seems during developing I'm faced with all the items from this video) I spend two years to understand how all this works )
Very good talk.
it is awesome! (his auto-distortion sound creator from accidental minus sign!)
wow amazing!
Fast math approximations already exist in many forms unsure why you had to invent these with your buddy. I would have liked to see a comparison of the actual code execution times for various math approximations and built in c++ libraries with examples. Also a comparison of the separate techniques and there execute times. Good presentation just wish it had more of the technical code explanation affirmation of why your process is choice . Thx
yes, that was what i was thinking. Would be nice to see the differences and comparisons and how it is faster to use their method instead. Maybe the biggest advantage in their implementation is that it is already in the framework so less things to link and perhaps make trouble at the end?
Juce, could u add the link Ivan mentioned to the description? TH-cam doesn't allow links to the comment section anymore so I can not find it..
Awesome where is the code posted?
@@TheApeMachine Thank you!