A Scientist's Controversial Research | Law & Order

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 446

  • @ayameisastar
    @ayameisastar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1393

    I don’t get it. He’s so hateful he’d rather have no daughter and no grandchildren rather than a possibility of a gay grandson? It makes no sense

    • @foolslayer9416
      @foolslayer9416 2 ปีที่แล้ว +215

      Hate dulls your better judgment, to the point you have none at all.

    • @elizabethjarram
      @elizabethjarram 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      He basically hates gays, from what I understood from the episode; that's my opinion though.

    • @foolslayer9416
      @foolslayer9416 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@elizabethjarram Hate can be a dangerous thing for humans to have, humans like being right more than they like the truth. So humans have a tendency to cling onto their hatred and it's justifications rather than face facts, and that's how we get the idiots we see today.

    • @benx6264
      @benx6264 2 ปีที่แล้ว +99

      that's what hate does to you. It doesn't have to make sense, it's just hate

    • @davidgrover5996
      @davidgrover5996 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Narrative/political agenda driven storyline defining character motivations to fit that narrative.

  • @sbss924
    @sbss924 2 ปีที่แล้ว +225

    I cant do this anymore, I cannot watch these, get all involved in the story, then ZAPPP- a cliffhanger. What happened in the end? :(

    • @adamlouis3725
      @adamlouis3725 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      the baby was a self hating gay that sent a bomb back in time to kill itself before birth

    • @jerikaljgdk
      @jerikaljgdk 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Dean confesses, he planted the bomb because he didn't want the doctor's research to be published. Ryan says he has to go through with the abortion so that his son won't be bullied for being gay, but then later he agrees to postpone it.

  • @dfmrcv862
    @dfmrcv862 2 ปีที่แล้ว +803

    Wait, I remember some of the stuff that scientist was talking about. Didn't that whole theory turn out to just be theoretical as the "gay gene" doesn't really serve as a guarantee of orientation?

    • @elisabethschmerzler963
      @elisabethschmerzler963 2 ปีที่แล้ว +177

      From what I can recall, basically it was a bunch of hooey. I think they basically hypothesize that orientation is more neurological than genetic, but overall it’s not really something scientifically concrete, since it’s a spectrum. All in all, some people are straight some are gay, and that’s that

    • @dfmrcv862
      @dfmrcv862 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      @@elisabethschmerzler963 Yeah. I remember my church had two different preachers as it developed. The first one said "this is fake and even if it wasn't it wouldn't matter" and then a few years later another preacher said "this was discovered but it doesn't really prove anything".
      ...my church has had some weird speakers in its history, but man, do they leave an impression.

    • @b2kzangelalwayz
      @b2kzangelalwayz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It’s a tv show as well.

    • @dfmrcv862
      @dfmrcv862 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@b2kzangelalwayz No, like I remember in my teens they talked about this, like... it was something being researched IRL.

    • @Unagodd
      @Unagodd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      There is some research that indicates a number of things that get dismissively termed "identitarian" have neurological markers or indicators. I can't recall if the most current research argues for a genetic basis, but I am passingly familiar with some recent studies that indicate there are minute neurological structural differences that increase the likelihood of homosexuality or being trans. There is also something I remember more vaguely about how the more older brothers a male has the higher the likelihood he will be gay, but I can't for the life of me recall what the hypothesized reason for the correlation was. All in all, there is existing science and ongoing science that does suggest biological or neurological factors may play a significant role in various sexual identity, supporting Lady Gaga's insightful claim that people, straight, gay, or trans, may in fact just be born that way.
      While it is wonderful to have a growing body of valid, reliable research to demonstrate that these personal characteristics are both natural and not subject to personal whim, our world is still filled with enough prejudice that concerns about using that science to target or root out "undesirable" people before they are even born have to be taken seriously.

  • @HermioneSharman15
    @HermioneSharman15 2 ปีที่แล้ว +247

    The interactions between Cutter & McCoy were gold in this episode.

    • @jamesfracasse8178
      @jamesfracasse8178 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Who?

    • @68404
      @68404 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I didn't even see Jack?

    • @fever_spike
      @fever_spike 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @jamesfracasse8178 @68404 Guys, obviously @HermioneSharman15 has seen the entire episode, and that is how she’s recalling Cutter and McCoy’s interactions…this teaser clip has nothing to do with her comment.

  • @nikopawlowic6557
    @nikopawlowic6557 2 ปีที่แล้ว +874

    I'm not saying that science is wrong on there being a genetic coding for someone to be gay, I am saying it's wrong to terminate a life based on such information. Everyone deserves a chance at life and make the best of it.

    • @wrappedaroundmyfinger
      @wrappedaroundmyfinger 2 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      I mean that’s up to the woman

    • @nikopawlowic6557
      @nikopawlowic6557 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@wrappedaroundmyfinger while you're right, I'd rather we do everything thing possible to convince them not to.

    • @magnarcreed3801
      @magnarcreed3801 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’d not give birth to a kid if they had a genetic disorder like the skin issue, autism, etc.
      Wouldn’t care about orientation though.

    • @lentilneeds
      @lentilneeds 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Funny tho homophobia is a conservative take but they draw the pro life argument at that then? And then if gay gene is real then didn’t god create it. I love how it’s all a web of self contradictory bullshit.

    • @briannamessier2412
      @briannamessier2412 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It could be a genetic predisposition, or the likelihood of happening, but ultimately if your parents were gay that doesn’t mean you’d turn out to be gay you’d just understand what it means to be gay better than someone who may have been raised by heterosexuals

  • @theduke7539
    @theduke7539 2 ปีที่แล้ว +169

    the boyfriend had a tough decision to make. he knows hes going to jail for a long time. when given the options, 1. save his son, garuntee lose his fiance, and his brother goes down with him. 2. Sacrifice his son, for the potential of maybe saving his fiancé's life and letting his brother go free.
    if she survives, she could live a normal life, meet someone else, move on. scared from the trauma, but alive.
    and his brother can do the same,
    but saving his son? a son whos father and uncle are in prison and whos mother is dead, and whos grandfather hates him because this 1 doctor says he is genetically predisposed to being gay. a son who would live a miserable life under his grandfather, or play russian roulette with the foster system.
    2 equally terrible decisions. Thats a tough one.

    • @dryb3301
      @dryb3301 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Or he could grow a spine and raise the son himself if his wife died and let his brother suffer the consequences of his crime.

    • @PokeMageTech
      @PokeMageTech 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      *scarred

    • @beverlyledbetter4906
      @beverlyledbetter4906 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Being gay is not inherited... its a choice for most!🙄

    • @ew6483
      @ew6483 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@beverlyledbetter4906 So when do people choose to be straight? I'm not saying it's inherited, I'm disputing your opinion that people choose to be gay.

    • @jordannewman177
      @jordannewman177 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ew6483They don’t choose to be straight, that’s the biological default setting. You have to choose to be gay as it differs from the default.

  • @testsubjectzz
    @testsubjectzz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    I've learnt that you can say anything but it has to be withdrawn.

    • @starpawsy
      @starpawsy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes. Once you put a thought into the juries' minds, there is no way you can take it out. And if the judge says "ignore that testimony" that will only make it more significant in their minds. It's a well-established technique.

  • @thomasplouffe1363
    @thomasplouffe1363 2 ปีที่แล้ว +268

    That baby is lucky to have survived the blast

    • @GuardianMinerva
      @GuardianMinerva 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yeah but not the shitty father

    • @chefbob09
      @chefbob09 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You do know that this is not real

    • @tiffanye9403
      @tiffanye9403 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      His made of kryptonite

    • @richardfox5164
      @richardfox5164 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@chefbob09 aaasaaaaassssssssssssssssssssasdsed

    • @aplit
      @aplit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But not a hateful family

  • @ayanoaishi8489
    @ayanoaishi8489 ปีที่แล้ว +161

    I can’t believe people would terminate a child just because they could be gay, so wrong

    • @gtw4546
      @gtw4546 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      In China during the one-child policy, aborting a fetus just because it was female was common. The result was a massive imbalance between males to females being born. Now you have 34 million more men than women.

    • @yucol5661
      @yucol5661 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      The argument for egenics has gained popularity over preventing autistic children or children with Down’s syndrome from being born. And think about the old controversy over making your child have blue eyes or be athletic or have designer qualities? Where do you draw the line? Which things are cruel and superfluous or kind and helpful?

    • @shockwave6213
      @shockwave6213 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I support biological engineering for the goal of Genetic enhancement via selective traits. A more athletic human race less prone to defects and diseases would be a good thing.

    • @vickys.love00
      @vickys.love00 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@gtw4546makes no sense, women have the power to create life. I’m not saying throwing any babies away is the answer or that one is more valuable than the other but would think that people would realize that

    • @gtw4546
      @gtw4546 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@vickys.love00 You’d think so! But the one-child policy was in effect for over 35 years and the “power to create life” when the purpose of the policy was for population control may have contributed negatively to the preference for a son.

  • @michaelmorton5698
    @michaelmorton5698 2 ปีที่แล้ว +145

    The homophobic grandfather-to-be is played by Tom Waites. He played the Fox in the 1980 film "The Warriors" with James Remar.

    • @charlenemontroy3722
      @charlenemontroy3722 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That’s not Tom Waites . Tom Waites is both a actor and a singer with a gravelly voice. The actor hear dose not

    • @downhomesunset
      @downhomesunset ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No Tom Waite played Gibb’s father on NCIS until he died. That’s not him!

    • @michaelmorton5698
      @michaelmorton5698 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@downhomesunset That was Ralph Waite. From "The Waltons".

    • @willhaslem
      @willhaslem 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The actors name is Thomas G. Waites which is different than Tom Waites. Two different people.

  • @elizabethjarram
    @elizabethjarram 2 ปีที่แล้ว +420

    This episode made me so angry, even if it's fictional.
    A scientist's research into "The Gay Gene." is interesting because it would allow you the choice to find out if your child would be gay in their life, at any point, but on the other hand; it's kinda like when the Nazis came to power and decided to wipe out any race that was not "Aryan." which sparked the Holocaust. This research could spark a very serious debate that could lead to a very serious situation.
    Furthermore, what kind of father would allow his daughter's unborn child to die, if it was GAY?! If I had a homosexual son, I would be so proud of him, I really mean it! Also, if someone did not want their child (regardless of whether it has been born yet or not) because it was gay, I would be more than happy to take that child on as my own, I really mean it!

    • @crucisnh
      @crucisnh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      This sort of problem exists today in China. Parents will abort female fetuses. Why? An economic decision. Due to the way that Chinese society is structured, male children are seen as the guarantors of their parents' future when they retire, while female children aren't. The problem is that this sort of thinking leads to an oversupply of male children, meaning that there won't be enough females to go around when it's time to marry, etc.
      Frankly, I think that China's issue is considerably more serious than the one you're outlining. Note that I'm in no way defending it, but as I see it, the nature of Chinese and American societies makes the Chinese problem more severe.

    • @richardkim3652
      @richardkim3652 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@crucisnh People kill unborn babies all the time... it's called abortion. Liberals, SJW, leftists and Democrats approve of it.

    • @fuzzlocker
      @fuzzlocker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@richardkim3652 No that's a fetus not a baby, silly man

    • @richardkim3652
      @richardkim3652 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@fuzzlocker No it's a baby. That's why it's called a "Abortion Baby" not a abortion fetus.

    • @fuzzlocker
      @fuzzlocker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@richardkim3652 No just an abortion silly boy

  • @nuschlerclark895
    @nuschlerclark895 2 ปีที่แล้ว +112

    MD here. Sexual orientation is partially determined between 10-14 weeks gestation--basically the first trimester of pregnancy. Environmental and biological factors are causes. There is NO gay gene. You can’t CHANGE sexual orientation. Gay vs straight is not binary. Most of us exist along a line between the two. No one CHOOSES to be gay OR straight! It’s not a weakness…it is what it is. Not about what religion says. One is not evil based on sexual orientation!
    Keep researching scientific sources.

    • @SphincterOfDoom
      @SphincterOfDoom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      The etiology of sexual orientation is still unknown.

    • @KristiContemplates
      @KristiContemplates 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Reviewing research papers, not researching research papers

    • @lillylovely4973
      @lillylovely4973 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No on chooses 🤔😑

    • @akkiko
      @akkiko ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@lillylovely4973 Sure. Some people choose to be straight. They choose to ignore those urges, get married, have kids and live white picket fence lives.
      And then you get those "My husband divorced me after 40 years because he was gay." stories, which is really just miserable and upsetting for everyone involved.

  • @Linkolnverse
    @Linkolnverse 2 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Nitroglycerin in heart medication, and being used for a bomb? Jesus christ.

    • @TheNatos
      @TheNatos 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      oh please.
      do you consume salt? raw sodium explodes in WATER.
      dont act like its some weird thing for some materials to have both dangerous and safe uses

    • @PerkyHedgewitch
      @PerkyHedgewitch 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@TheNatos salt isn't raw sodium. It's sodium chloride, NaCl.
      The nitroglycerin heart medication, however, is the same as the kind that goes boom (C3H5(NO3)3). The only difference is that in solid form (tablets) it's stable, while in liquid form it's not stable.

    • @TheNatos
      @TheNatos 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@PerkyHedgewitch i didnt say salt WAS raw sodium? way to miss the point

    • @toomanyaccounts
      @toomanyaccounts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      .5 mg the same amount as in a cap gun cap. there is a reason why pipe and other bombs use either modern gunpowder, black powder, powder from fireworks or actual explosives.

    • @Nevertoleave
      @Nevertoleave 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@TheNatos you implied it

  • @niicole_tv7900
    @niicole_tv7900 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    There’s no gay gene 😭😭😭🤣 LMAO

  • @ashoikiesaunders721
    @ashoikiesaunders721 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Spoil me please . Somebody .....Anybody !!!

  • @aaronburgin1442
    @aaronburgin1442 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    One of two L&O to feature Tom Guiry, aka “Smalls” from “The Sandlot”

    • @jamesfracasse8178
      @jamesfracasse8178 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The short detective?

    • @carterfamily3890
      @carterfamily3890 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@jamesfracasse8178 No, he plays the young husband. The one whose wife is hurt.

    • @RosiePosey5150
      @RosiePosey5150 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I loved smalls. He reminds me of a friend I grew up with.

  • @Mandy87Marie
    @Mandy87Marie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    Seems like they took a lot of liberties with this episode. How was the husband able to have the pregnancy terminated without her consent (she was unconscious). Unless her life was in danger, wouldn’t it go against her body autonomy?

    • @billyw8186
      @billyw8186 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      IIRC it would increase her chances of recovery, but its was a really small increase.

    • @erinblais1630
      @erinblais1630 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      No, if you're in a coma, you'd have a substitute decision maker. If there is no existing living, will, that responsibility usually lies on the spouse. Because the husband hasn't been legally charged with anything, he can still make this decision.

    • @nsahandler
      @nsahandler ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Incapacitated persons have no autonomy; The law has developed a multi-step process for identifying who is responsible in cases of incapacity.
      It's either:
      1) someone explicitly designated as the decision maker,
      2) the nearest family member,
      3) the geographically-closest blood relative, or
      4) the current Healthcare provider.
      #1-3 are allowed to make any decision they see fit regarding the person's treatment options, while #4 is bound by ethics to keep you alive as long as possible with as little suffering as possible until treatment results in a successful recovery or until they have unilaterally determined brain death.

    • @Ouchiness
      @Ouchiness ปีที่แล้ว

      How can u turn medical nitroglycerin into explosives?

    • @nsahandler
      @nsahandler ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Ouchiness science and higher concentrations than you can ever obtain medically

  • @bernayhansondescendantofth9969
    @bernayhansondescendantofth9969 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I noticed one of the sons wanted to keep a newborn child. But for his behavior, the solution I think of is that the infant should be put up for adoption, maybe. And judging by his age, give the infant to a different family. He doesn't deserve to keep the infant.

  • @xXeddie92Xx
    @xXeddie92Xx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    you're killing me Smalls...

  • @thewrongshoes
    @thewrongshoes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Makes you wonder what would happen they really could screen babies for homosexuality

    • @draguta8995
      @draguta8995 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Look at history to find the answer.

    • @julesmasseffectmusic
      @julesmasseffectmusic ปีที่แล้ว

      2 seconds after that discovery, mandatory free screening and mandatory abortions in the USA.
      5 seconds after that mandatory sterilisation of all with the gene, in the USA.
      Weekly school massacres will continue to increase until it's daily like ordinary mass shootings.

  • @Bigrignohio
    @Bigrignohio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    How in the heck are you supposed to make a bomb from the tiny bit of nitro mixed in with a binder in heart pills.

    • @alexzander7629
      @alexzander7629 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I imagine 1) He's been storing up for a long time and 2) some kind of professional background relating to chemistry

    • @Bigrignohio
      @Bigrignohio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@alexzander7629 If he has that knowledge it is far easier to make it from scratch. The two main compounds are not that difficult to get and a little bit of lab equipment will let you make all you need. Assuming you do not kill yourself, poison yourself, or sear your lungs out (acid is nasty).

    • @Daisy-sj6qx
      @Daisy-sj6qx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Ask MacGyver, I bet he knows the way XD

    • @gameofpwns1165
      @gameofpwns1165 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly haha makes no sense

    • @toomanyaccounts
      @toomanyaccounts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gameofpwns1165 black powder or even firework powder would be better.

  • @daveintucson8541
    @daveintucson8541 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    @6:47 Are they upset now because your work might lead to a screening test?
    I guess opposing counsel was asleep just then? Calls for speculation.

  • @kalebisawesome1396
    @kalebisawesome1396 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    We should include the theme song in one of these clips.

  • @erwanne1305
    @erwanne1305 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I didn't get this one at all. Can some one help me out?

    • @Deborahtunes
      @Deborahtunes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      It was definitely intriguing. After reading some of the other comments, it seems this baby was the brother's, not his...

  • @widowrumstrypze9705
    @widowrumstrypze9705 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Whoa! Is the Grandpa Fox from The Warriors?!

  • @Boppinabe
    @Boppinabe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    OMG the judge is RC3!!!

  • @mummaoutaroad2476
    @mummaoutaroad2476 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Rubs eyes : HUH?

  • @estelaliliana5429
    @estelaliliana5429 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Cómo echaremos de menos a Cutter!!!!

  • @iammarlonwilson
    @iammarlonwilson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    WAIT NOO???? WHY WAS IT SO EASY FOR HIM TO LET GO OF THE SON?!?!?!?????!!

    • @jaimeduncan6167
      @jaimeduncan6167 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Maybe he is just liberal and believes that there is no son to get rid of, just a bunch of cells?

    • @karinaashmon
      @karinaashmon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@jaimeduncan6167 take a science class. And learn how developments work. Though with in laws like that it would be a nightmare

    • @Vieweracc99
      @Vieweracc99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      Because it's isn't *his* son... it's his brother's.

    • @jamswhams
      @jamswhams 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@jaimeduncan6167 cuz it's the brothers -_-

    • @JohnCooper-gm6mn
      @JohnCooper-gm6mn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@jaimeduncan6167 Way to go trying to turn this thread into a political, religious and ethical debate all in one go, rather than just giving the real reason from the episode.

  • @meowbatter4966
    @meowbatter4966 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Could someone tell me the short version of this case about because a “gay gene” baby? I’m no scientist but I don’t know if that means the baby is gay right?

    • @shanajeangedeon9060
      @shanajeangedeon9060 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It means there is a possibility, but it isn't a guarantee.

  • @SusanHukel-rm4lg
    @SusanHukel-rm4lg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Of any reason justifiable to terminate a pregnancy and there are reasons,sexual orientation isn't one of them.that's not for anyone to judge.deal with it.

    • @takumi2023
      @takumi2023 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wheres the religious nuts claiming abortion is a sin.

  • @terrynasonisasupervillain9017
    @terrynasonisasupervillain9017 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Nice video and hi

  • @iankravitz5723
    @iankravitz5723 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    There's only two problems here.
    1. you would need a proverbial 'truckload' of nitro tablets to get enough nitro to make a bomb. One tablet is 0.4 grams, one ounce is 30 grams one ounce of nitro would be as explosive as a small firecracker. You would need at least a quart of nitro to do any damage. To get a quart of nitro you'd need 3,200 tablets. And even large pharmacies can't order that much at once!
    2. There is no gay gene, or combination of genes. Four scientific studies have been done in the last 40 years, and all were inconclusive.

  • @PingooProducts
    @PingooProducts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I can't get over the fact they used a Revolver Cocking sound for a Glock. 4:14

    • @68404
      @68404 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can't hear it. And why would you put it on single action?
      In any case, why would you carry a pistol without having racked the slide?

    • @dylanram4653
      @dylanram4653 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@68404 1. turn volume up higher for the why would u put it on single action pistols dont have single or double action as they dont have the hammer of a revolver and 3 so u dont shoot yourself in the leg, could be using it as a safety without using the safety?

  • @lauriegrensky3617
    @lauriegrensky3617 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    What is Joe West doing here?

  • @elliephantom
    @elliephantom ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Well this episode aged like milk, given the way America is acting today.

    • @Fyrdman
      @Fyrdman ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao you're delusional. All institutions are on your side and you still act like you're victims.

    • @yucol5661
      @yucol5661 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Why? America acts more liberal now on matters of homosexuality. Why would people like it less now? Also cheese is pretty good

    • @criminalitycollective
      @criminalitycollective 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yucol5661agreed. Or do you mean around topic of abortion in this episode?

  • @DoggieFosters
    @DoggieFosters 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Um, why did they choose to dress/display a coma patient in such a way?

    • @Avatar-Destiny
      @Avatar-Destiny 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because she just got out of surgery?

    • @DoggieFosters
      @DoggieFosters 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Avatar-Destiny I'm not talking about the first 2 minutes.
      5:10

    • @downhomesunset
      @downhomesunset ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@DoggieFosters yeah I thought that too. It looks like they put a busty dress on her!

    • @calvinallen3424
      @calvinallen3424 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@downhomesunset lol it was just a dress

    • @lindahamilton800
      @lindahamilton800 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just the thing for a bed bath!

  • @beverlyledbetter4906
    @beverlyledbetter4906 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Another looker: Jeremy Sisto!🤘

  • @Who.is.King.
    @Who.is.King. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Is it Ryan's son??

  • @silencia08
    @silencia08 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What's the spoiler of this episode?

  • @SeanMcGuire92
    @SeanMcGuire92 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    What ended up happening?

    • @Fade2BlackMCfade
      @Fade2BlackMCfade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If I had to guess either a the kid is the brother's or b the dad is homophobic just like the grandpa

  • @tessa3851
    @tessa3851 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Don't like being this early. There's no funny comments or spoilers yet :(

  • @TheBeingReal
    @TheBeingReal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Girlfriend in a coma, I know it’s serious.

  • @yennisopheialestaris.h335
    @yennisopheialestaris.h335 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Kenapa harus menghubungi polisi, ya?

  • @calvinallen3424
    @calvinallen3424 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So who blew her up and why?

    • @JennyZinaTavares
      @JennyZinaTavares 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dean did it. Unfortunately, Fandom doesn't say much about this episode. See TV Tropes for this episode. It explains the why.

    • @calvinallen3424
      @calvinallen3424 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@JennyZinaTavares Thanks

  • @KristiContemplates
    @KristiContemplates 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Review the available peer reviewed scientific research papers published

  • @DatVideoDoe
    @DatVideoDoe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    That’s the thing though about scientists, they can’t be going around just discovering things for the sake of science. We live in a society. You have to think about the potential ramifications and consequences of your scientific discoveries. Sometimes, it’s best to not discover something.

    • @Fairfieldfencer
      @Fairfieldfencer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      First of all, I hate the line "We live in a society." Joker was just a horror movie for rich people.
      Secondly, discoveries have their good and bad. Man discovered fire and with it came warmth and burns. This discovery ended up not being concrete, and yes it could have been used to target gay children if it was true, but only if society allowed it. The discovery was not the problem, it was how people used that discovery. The stance that society needs to stay ignorant lest they hurt themselves with their own discoveries is what led to scientists and chemists being called warlocks and witches.

    • @Biorythym
      @Biorythym 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@Fairfieldfencer Dang you beat me to fire analogy. Bottom line, knowledge isn't bad, only what you do with that knowledge

    • @TheGroundedAviator
      @TheGroundedAviator 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Biorythym Look at nuclear technology, cancer treatment, power... big bombs.

    • @Biorythym
      @Biorythym 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheGroundedAviator Can't tell if your agreeing or disagreeing with me

    • @TheGroundedAviator
      @TheGroundedAviator 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Neither, all about context with me.

  • @ursaltydog
    @ursaltydog 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is the mental gymnastics conservative evangelicals put their brains through...

  • @hollythecatgirl492
    @hollythecatgirl492 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please tell me the baby wasn't terminated!

  • @mikesilva3868
    @mikesilva3868 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great 😊

  • @luvlylady55
    @luvlylady55 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    omg.. now a baby will never know life just because some scientist thinks that the baby has the so called "gay gene"? this is so stupid.. who cares if the baby is gay or not..they are wrong in deciding its fate...if my child turned out to be gay..it wouldnt matter..because I have complete love for my child..and would never judge him or her...its not right what they did to the baby..

  • @tamekkaknuth9612
    @tamekkaknuth9612 ปีที่แล้ว

    1/2 law 1/2 medical = Christmas = 100 percent

  • @Quintus468
    @Quintus468 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    okay but...the kid is actually the brother's, right? That's the real issue, yes? this clip show is kind of incoherent but I think that's what's up.

    • @emilyk6510
      @emilyk6510 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      No I think the brother was gay

  • @HorrorLover98
    @HorrorLover98 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I thought nitroglycerin in medicine isn't explosive, its diluted to the point that it loses its explosive properties or something?

  • @pavithram4084
    @pavithram4084 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Any spoilers?

  • @teodorusdikypermadi
    @teodorusdikypermadi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The cases something about gene DNA

  • @tamekkaknuth9612
    @tamekkaknuth9612 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for hating my heart!!

  • @winsomefoster
    @winsomefoster 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The baby is for Dean

  • @sexychelseacharms1861
    @sexychelseacharms1861 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    COURTNEY COX

  • @princessofbratz
    @princessofbratz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this episode makes vv little sense. socially ppl don’t act this dense and ask poorly contextualized questions.

  • @ossies.2002
    @ossies.2002 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Spoiler please ❤

  • @MountainMan-bz9lk
    @MountainMan-bz9lk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He’s making money for his baby and they’re calling him not serious 1:48

  • @gendoll5006
    @gendoll5006 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there a genetic code for me liking the color purple?

  • @majcorbin
    @majcorbin ปีที่แล้ว +1

    IOWA DAD JOKE of the day
    [Q] at what time,do DUCKS wake up?
    [A] why,at the QUACK of dawn,of course
    make 1984 fiction again

  • @jessicapearson9479
    @jessicapearson9479 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also, if such away to tell if your fetus is messed up or not was possible I would make sure to have that done and abort it!!

  • @nicholasmaude6906
    @nicholasmaude6906 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This clip reminded me what a hottie Connie Rubiosa was.

  • @kamnapavon4638
    @kamnapavon4638 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "Gay Gene"?
    Is that like a Beta Blocker?
    I do not know if some of their Science is anything more than Pseudo Science?
    There goes the Wrestling Team!

  • @robertfergusson5367
    @robertfergusson5367 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Junk science is the folly and downfall of fools.

  • @SomebodyelseBiteme
    @SomebodyelseBiteme 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jeremy Sisto……..❤️❤️❤️🥰🥰🥰🥰

  • @kirsyrosa2595
    @kirsyrosa2595 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Take your church with you...#Mon1936

  • @JustCallMeKen
    @JustCallMeKen ปีที่แล้ว +18

    1:08 "The fetus should be okay as long as Ms. Emerson is on life support." Wow. It's like the doctor is talking about two different human beings there. That's because she is.

    • @QapNPoo
      @QapNPoo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1 human and 1 fetus actually.

  • @tamekkaknuth9612
    @tamekkaknuth9612 ปีที่แล้ว

    1.5 15 51

  • @Vampybattie
    @Vampybattie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would definitely about if I knew my baby was gay lol

    • @TheLadyKatt
      @TheLadyKatt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You need therapy.

    • @danomyte67
      @danomyte67 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pathetic

    • @ew6483
      @ew6483 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Have you changed your homophobic views after a year?

  • @katherynemero4118
    @katherynemero4118 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    It's funny to me that people love science so much when scientific research comes up with a theory like this one. What could be the reasoning behind researching something like that? So, at best, science is easily manipulatable, which proves that it's basically the same as religion. In my estimation anyway. Science can too easily be bad.

    • @usernameisuckatusernames7130
      @usernameisuckatusernames7130 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      science is self-correcting and constantly changing with new information to better explain something. religion is static because you have to see it on its terms and no one else's while science is flexible because anyone can prove or disprove regardless of viewpoint. can it be manipulated? yes, by external nonsense not because it's always wrong in it of itself, because as stated and implied: anyone can question it, anyone can challenge it, anyone can test it, and if many others come to the same conclusion as many more, then it is science. Otherwise, then it's wrong.
      sorry, just really hate it when people completely forget how science actually works.

    • @brmbkl
      @brmbkl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      " people love science so much when scientific research comes up with a theory like this one. "
      true.
      truth is only interesting, when it proves what some people already think, or when it's convenient as a means to support some other agenda. it's not what you find, but what you research, that determines what the truth is. the theory dictates what the findings will be. even then; that there's a gay gene could teach ppl that being gay is natural, ofcourse some ppl call it a natural defect. so the truth doesn't even matter. only what people do with that truth. science doesn't care, indeed. scientists don't care about morality, or how their inventions can be misused. it's not their job to apply morality, so the responsability is someone else's. when the 'researcher' said "science only cares about truth" he means he doesn't care, as long as it makes him famous/succesful.

    • @adamlouis3725
      @adamlouis3725 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      religion is dogmatic, the opposite of science. if you cant tell the difference its a personal issue

    • @katherynemero4118
      @katherynemero4118 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adamlouis3725 Actually, I think you DON'T understand what I'm saying. There's no point in talking to you. But, so you know, I don't have a problem with this.

    • @julesmasseffectmusic
      @julesmasseffectmusic ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah the physicist crusades where bad.

  • @NA86737
    @NA86737 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Gay gene screening would finally cause the LGBTQ community to be against abortion and would truly force so-called right to life conservatives to stick to their word and follow through on their actions that life is sacred.

    • @katiesnudden829
      @katiesnudden829 2 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      How does that even make sense?

    • @pastelpurpledeathbed
      @pastelpurpledeathbed 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@katiesnudden829 it makes a lot of sense

    • @LightningFox7
      @LightningFox7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Alright there is no gay gene at all.

    • @Alix27516
      @Alix27516 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      The first part makes no sense, the second kind of does.

    • @manuelb5466
      @manuelb5466 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Why would the LGBTQ+ be against abortion all of a sudden? And why would it force conservatives to be pro-life?

  • @nerdygeekgamer5528
    @nerdygeekgamer5528 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I remember watching this episode and I'm still confused sense when is falling in love with your own gender genetic cause I don't believe that part one bit

  • @MountainMan-bz9lk
    @MountainMan-bz9lk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I fucking hate this show

  • @JimManeri
    @JimManeri 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Such a horrible edit I have no idea what this is about. The whole thing at the end I have no idea and I am a very educated an accomplished person. Very poor editing, should’ve just left the episode the way it was

    • @68404
      @68404 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      "..and I am a very educated an accomplished person"
      And a belter it seems.

  • @youtubestaffareairheads631
    @youtubestaffareairheads631 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    FURBABY🤗❤😍💙🥰🧡!!!! #happy2022🍺✨🧨🥂🎆🎊⭐🎇🥳🎉🎑!!!!

  • @enjoyer9525
    @enjoyer9525 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    2 views

    • @enjoyer9525
      @enjoyer9525 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      and 6 likes... youtube is on meth.