Analysis and Design of a Flyback; Transformer Design A, Part 18

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 48

  • @backpacknrideoff3211
    @backpacknrideoff3211 ปีที่แล้ว

    absolutely amazinnglecture, I am very confident now with transformer design,thank you so much

  • @anandparalkar
    @anandparalkar 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Robert, thanks so much for taking the time to put this video together. It really helps newbie designers like myself to get started quickly.

    • @RobertBolanos
      @RobertBolanos  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Anand, I hope you and the family are doing well. Give my regards to you mother, father, and brother for me. I remember them from our trip to Austin. Best regards, Robert

    • @anandparalkar
      @anandparalkar 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      ....sure.....need to catch-up on the latest two videos...

  • @anandparalkar
    @anandparalkar 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's a really neat Excel. Will take away a lot of sweat work when going through a design.

  • @Ramkumar-le4me
    @Ramkumar-le4me 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    please send the all the datasheet and excel sheet which you have refeered in this video

  • @-dazz-
    @-dazz- 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Señor Bolanos, si las visitas a su canal se disparan en los próximos días, soy yo viendo sus videos una y otra vez, porque son buenísimos pero yo soy un poco lento. XD.
    Muchísimas gracias por compartir sus conocimientos de manera tan clara y exhaustiva

    • @RobertBolanos
      @RobertBolanos  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      dazz , muchas gracias por tu mensaje. Con todo respecto, Roberto Bolanos

    • @RobertBolanos
      @RobertBolanos  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      dazz mandane mensaje a rbola35618@aol.com y yo te mando mid notas y files para similar.

    • @-dazz-
      @-dazz- 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RobertBolanos Muchas gracias de nuevo. Sus notas seguro me servirían de referencia, y para simulación yo uso LTSpice pero supongo que podré adaptar los circuitos. Le escribo ese mail en breve. Canales como el suyo deberían tener mucha más divulgación, pero lamentablemente el algoritmo de Google parece promocionar el clickbait y la basura sensacionalista por encima de la calidad del contenido.
      En fin, feliz año nuevo a usted y los suyos!

  • @RobertBolanos
    @RobertBolanos  8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Satyavijay, good catch, it should be duty^2. I will make a annotation on the video in the next day or so. Thank you.

  • @grahamsopp
    @grahamsopp 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    enjoying your tutorial - but at 22.57 I calculate 16.9uH, not 17.8

  • @friendman2001
    @friendman2001 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am going through your lessons and enjoying them. Are the lessons and the switching power supplies A to Z book to be used as a reference good enough for power supply design?

    • @RobertBolanos
      @RobertBolanos  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, that is a very good book. I have that book!

  • @satd2024
    @satd2024 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for another great video. The formula for primary inductance at starting shows only Duty but in the example (at 23.20 min) it shows Duty square (Duty ^2) in the formula. Somewhat confused about formula please clarify.

  • @peeyushchauhan2189
    @peeyushchauhan2189 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir at instant 25:00 u have solved the Ap formula but the result should be 419.322 cm4 where he term .0.042cm4 has come..can you explain . might be i am missing some thing.

  • @titeman9374
    @titeman9374 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Alright I appreciate your reply why I talk about arranging all your videos together for easy access because right now I can not see your video on tutorial 10,13,15,16,21, and some others .Thanks

    • @RobertBolanos
      @RobertBolanos  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Let me see if I can fix that. It is very good feedback. If you are having trouble, then other people are having trouble as well. Robert

    • @RobertBolanos
      @RobertBolanos  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Tite Man, I think I fixed it. Please check it out. Thank you so much for the feedback. I think this is much better. You should be able to play them in the correct sequence. Robert Bolanos

  • @quangcuon6683
    @quangcuon6683 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi sir, at 19:50 I think the current input Iin RMS = Ipeak*squareroot(Duty/3). Correct me pls! 🙂

    • @RobertBolanos
      @RobertBolanos  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Cuon, nice catch! You are correct!

    • @quangcuon6683
      @quangcuon6683 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RobertBolanos Love that you confirmed 😍

  • @karastom2304
    @karastom2304 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks so much you are very smart engineer

  • @srinivasssd7545
    @srinivasssd7545 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Robert , I have a doubt regarding topology constant value ??? What is the exact value we should use ???.I have found some other value Kt= 0.00033 for flyback which one I should follow please suggest sir..

  • @satd2024
    @satd2024 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, Many books / articles uses different-different formula for calculating number of primary turns. If we plug-in our data in those different formulas answers will be different for every formula. Some are including waveform coefficient as well as duty ratio others omit one of it or both. How to decide which formula should we use?

  • @Ramkumar-le4me
    @Ramkumar-le4me 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You have selected EFD 20 core you have selected in design example. but in the datasheet max wattage is less than 24 how you select EFD20.Please calrify

  • @eternalskychuang4469
    @eternalskychuang4469 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for Robert share
    It help me so mush

  • @harin188
    @harin188 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks a lot sir ur video is very usefull

  • @vickys3555
    @vickys3555 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir in some books it is mentioned that air gap is necessary in case of flyback transformer design and for that AL value is also important, but you have designed transformer by different method and didn't mentioned air gap. So please clear my doubt. Thank you

    • @RobertBolanos
      @RobertBolanos  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Vicky, That is so true. We need an airgap. So you use a core that has higher AL that will exceed the designed inductance. For example, if you watch video 6, I wound the transformer ungapped and then grinded the center core to get the designed design inductance. There is a formula to calculate the gap. However, some people use sheet of paper inserted into the gap to simulate a gap. I prefer to start grinding and measure the inductance until I get the desired inductance. That was a great question. RB

    • @harikrishna1256
      @harikrishna1256 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Even I have this doubt
      Do you have any document where I can design a Flyback trafo?

  • @TheGovindtrm
    @TheGovindtrm 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, is it really required to calculate inductance.. Seems, no where we are using it. Can you please explain..

    • @RobertBolanos
      @RobertBolanos  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, it is necessary to calculate the primary inductance. The amount of inductance determines what mode of current conduction you are operating. This video discussion is for a simple design using discontinuous conduction mode (DCM) and using a current mode PWM. Using these two properties allows you to design a simple compensation where you don't have to worry about the RHPZ and the subharmonic oscillation and thus you don't need to use slope conpensation. Hope this make sense.

  • @chintukota757
    @chintukota757 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    how primary inductance equation came sir?

  • @nurulamin5056
    @nurulamin5056 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    give the list of core size selection

  • @chintukota757
    @chintukota757 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    in Lm duty*duty or only duty cycle

  • @RobertBolanos
    @RobertBolanos  6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Chintu, it should be Lm*Duty*Duty. Robert

  • @titeman9374
    @titeman9374 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please can you send me your core chart

  • @karastom2304
    @karastom2304 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Robert is .16T for any level of power?

    • @RobertBolanos
      @RobertBolanos  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      When calculating the AP of the core, use 0.16T. But when you are calculating the Nturn, then use B from 0.16T to 80% of the materials Bsaturation. In my example, my Bsaturation is 0.370T. So my my example, I can use a B from 0.16T to 0.293T. However, as B goes up, Nturns goes down, and Pcore_losss go up. So there are many compromisise. I will be doing another video tonight review this information and then cover the subject of skin effects and proximity losses.

    • @karastom2304
      @karastom2304 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks so much

  • @titeman9374
    @titeman9374 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please send me your excel calculator

    • @RobertBolanos
      @RobertBolanos  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Send me your email address.

    • @rakeshrohira4605
      @rakeshrohira4605 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you send me the excel calculator also at my Email Rohira@gmail.com. Thanks

  • @RobertBolanos
    @RobertBolanos  8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Satyavijay, good catch, it should be duty^2. I will make a annotation on the video in the next day or so. Thank you