Dr Chidi Odinkalu Condemns Court Ruling Declaring Section 84(12) of Electoral Act Unconstitutional
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ส.ค. 2024
- Dr Chidi Odinkalu joins ARISE News in #ThisDayLive to share his views on the recent court ruling declaring Section 84(12) of the Electoral Act as unconstitutional.
Subscribe to our Channel for high profile interviews. Follow us on Twitter at / arisetv |
and Instagram: / arisenewsofficial |
and Facebook: / arisetvnews |
Check out our website www.arise.tv
Professor Chidi Odin kalu is an intellectual warrior. You spoke on behalf of the soul of the country Nigeria.
How refreshing it is to listen to Prof Chidi Odinkalu, he x-rayed the danger that lies ahead of us with respect to the crooked judgement from Umahia.
What a man. It is quite hopeful, to find out, that Nigeria still has intelligent bright minds like this Professor Chidi Odinkalu..
It's a privilege listening to Dr. Odinkalu always. The perspectives are fresh and elucidating.
So refreshing listening to Prof. Chidi Odinkalu’s analysis of the case. The Nigerian Courts don’t work with such speed and execution, and as a trained attorney myself, I strongly believe the integrity of the decision is suspect.
Many of us were blindsided by who this judgement favored, not knowing the danger this judgement could mean when you are seeking for elective position and you do not have state resources to protect it. There is two sides to a coin. Always good to look at both sides.
Checkmate most of those judges coz most of them may not be a secondary school certificate holders,why is it that almost everybody in that so called Nigeria is going blind?
smart mind
You people should talk about the crippled woman who jeremiah omoto stolen and still arrested
Abati, why does Odikalu have the right to condemn the judgement of this court while Umahi doesn't have the right to condemn Ekwo? Arise TV! "Manifestly crooked" Abati didn't say Odikalu should be charged for contempt. Hmmmmm
He did ask the prof. He asked if his his comments weren't contemptuous…
Mind his choice of words, that's the difference!
Shut up ewu. Go and listen to umahi , and come back and listen to odinkalu. If your head doesnt see the difference then we can't help you
Am very disappointed with Prof Chidi Odinkalu on dis...u can't b dis learned and criticize a judge dis way on national TV...how speedy a judgement is does not in anyway affect d integrity of a judgement. Dat judgement was need as quick as possible so rights of pple are not affected as regard d new electorial act so u can blame d court for acting swiftly; if d judgment had gone d way he wanted he won't have questioned d speed of d judgement. In fact we are looking for speedy judgement in dis country so why criticize a speedily dispensed judgement?
The next 2023 PRESIDENT of Nigeria is Honorable MINISTER for transportation Rotimi AMAECHI.
You and Amaechi na mugu una be
Na who poison your breakfast?
@Isreal obiagwu how much are this pple paying you or are you fake person hiding under a name to seek pples attention 😂😂😂😂😂
The political appointees have always resigned from office before contesting election. How come Prof. Chidi Odinkalu and his likes never tell them not to resign because they are not public servants? Meanwhile, it's only the office of the attorney general that have the local standi to appeal the judgment because the document has become document of the federal government of Nigeria. The plaintiff didn't sue the national assembly but the federal government of Nigeria.
Political appointees are not public officials. One of the cardinal rules in public office is non-partisanship. Everyone knows that political appointees are very partisan, especially in our climes. But back to the matter, let me ask a very simple question. How fair is it, if you and I are to run a race, and you are in charge of choosing the race umpires, the race venue, and are even the keeper of the prize? What happens, like we have seen severally in Nigeria, when against all odds I beat you and then your refuse to hand over the prize? Why should a political appointee use the machinery of the state and her resources to pursue a personal ambition? Now, if these appointees in question are as popular and "good" as they feel they are, let them resign and contest on neutral terms like everybody else. Or what are they afraid of?