Munambam People, in India there are many different people. Language, religion .caste, colour are the factors differentiating people. The Munambam people and their leaders , simple and true speaking people about their rights. No revolution say as that of V S Achu. For V S Achu revolution say one side , and "Than kariam" or "selfishness " on the other side. The following are the qualities of Munambam protest. 1. Their residential right have more that 7 to 8 generation history. Both the then time "Kochi Raja " and "Travancore Raja" knew the history of this people. 2. Both Rajas never favored the slaughter of babies in Munambam and both the Raja's also not done anything to evocate the children below the age of 7 years from Munambam. " Bharatheeyam" bothe the Rajas put into practice at Munambam. 3. Now one youtuber disclosed that in 1948 period the land's real ownership was in Favour of a child who's name was "Ameena" and Sidique Saith was only a Gurdian to her. That Gurdian did some wrong on the property right of Child "Ameena ". The finding of this research may be true. But get validity only if Ameena still alive and makes complaint. Otherwise remain as truth or reality. But to Munambam people the findings also favour for their natural rights against artificial Wakaf claims. 4. In before Munambam people Justice Nijar and a few Wakaf's people's conspiracy to label the Munambam land as Wakaf land , remain as Cobra to natural law and the holistic aspects of "Bharatheeyam ". 5. The Wakaf's aim is to evicte the people from Munambam. But Justice Ramachandran's aim to establish " Baratheeeyam " and give respect to "Non Violence" and "Ahimsa". The whole India is waiting for his work based with "Bharatheeyam ". Because the judge Mr Ramachandran Nair know that throughout Inda "Vedas' and "Ramayana" give moral force to " Bharatheeyam" .
Munambam People, in India there are many different people. Language, religion .caste, colour are the factors differentiating people. The Munambam people and their leaders , simple and true speaking people about their rights. No revolution say as that of V S Achu. For V S Achu revolution say one side , and "Than kariam" or "selfishness " on the other side.
The following are the qualities of Munambam protest.
1. Their residential right have more that 7 to 8 generation history. Both the then time "Kochi Raja " and "Travancore Raja" knew the history of this people.
2. Both Rajas never favored the slaughter of babies in Munambam and both the Raja's also not done anything to evocate the children below the age of 7 years from Munambam. " Bharatheeyam" bothe the Rajas put into practice at Munambam.
3. Now one youtuber disclosed that in 1948 period the land's real ownership was in Favour of a child who's name was "Ameena" and Sidique Saith was only a Gurdian to her. That Gurdian did some wrong on the property right of Child "Ameena ". The finding of this research may be true. But get validity only if Ameena still alive and makes complaint. Otherwise remain as truth or reality. But to Munambam people the findings also favour for their natural rights against artificial Wakaf claims.
4. In before Munambam people Justice Nijar and a few Wakaf's people's conspiracy to label the Munambam land as Wakaf land , remain as Cobra to natural law and the holistic aspects of "Bharatheeyam ".
5. The Wakaf's aim is to evicte the people from Munambam. But Justice Ramachandran's aim to establish " Baratheeeyam " and give respect to "Non Violence" and "Ahimsa". The whole India is waiting for his work based with "Bharatheeyam ". Because the judge Mr Ramachandran Nair know that throughout Inda "Vedas' and "Ramayana" give moral force to " Bharatheeyam" .
Pigemol varum rahul kutan varum