Super insightful! Thanks for getting this kind of speakers 🚀 Curious to see what future YC batches full of Quantum Computing-inspired Startups might look like.
Why the hell TH-cam doesn't suggest me this earlier? It's too late now I am out of college :( I should have done the data structure+Stat Mech+ Advance Quantum courses+Machine Learning and others in college although I have a MS in Chemistry
For an enthusiast this is brilliantly laid out . Not many can do justice to this topic. I hope this will ignite a passion to study this further, Preskill's book is also amazing for beginners. I would like to see more videos about Quantum Complexity .
Thank you for putting that Quantum Complexity interview . Also I am thankful for Y Combinator 's Startup Rigetti, leading us in quantum supremacy. This channel is treasure
"Many a true word is spoken in jest", and puns must be the top of the list for nearly true approximations, so "leaky branes" is a favourite concept from Professor Preskill's observations. Because in an overall analog computation of QM in which the knowledge, the information accumulated in every individual's brain, is constantly changing and accessing that information is contingent on the various methodological approaches by which it's stored and retreived, the "truth" changes in every shift of context, just like a Quantum Computer must. The superposition of QM-Time is emulated by modular templates of experience integrating the dominant probabilities, sum-of-all-history in each sub context.., all in one. And it's "all interference" along different paths of one sort or another. Quantum Computers will be Savant ability Librarians, a less leaky, but also less synthesizing extension of human brains.., that's what is possible, ..so far it's also the probable way to interpret the WWW. Good interview, thanks.
John is one of the best teachers around, thanks for his classic lectures!
as a high schooler (going into 10th grade now) who has been studying quantum for a few years, the stuff john said is really enlightening
This looks great---thanks!
Correction for the blog transcript: It's Peter Shor (not Shore) and Shor's algorithm.
Thanks!
Super insightful! Thanks for getting this kind of speakers 🚀
Curious to see what future YC batches full of Quantum Computing-inspired Startups might look like.
Thanks for watching! -Craig
Have you ever thought of getting a explanation for Quantum Computing?
The S sound ......
Apply to breaking down plastic? Super bacteria? Go quantum!! Go super positioning & entanglement! Get r done! Giallo.
Chitti ko crous gar to
Surma ma ko seglo
Quantum computers are impossible or no praticle. Read IEEE Spectrum.
John: we need quantum repeaters
me, a minecraft redstone pro: did someone say repeaters
Quantum error correction works! The problem is, scaling it is NP hard! Too bad! Lol, it's been a fantastically lucrative scam tho
thank you for posting such a wonderful interview!
Why the hell TH-cam doesn't suggest me this earlier? It's too late now I am out of college :( I should have done the data structure+Stat Mech+ Advance Quantum courses+Machine Learning and others in college although I have a MS in Chemistry
great stuff. thanks
For an enthusiast this is brilliantly laid out . Not many can do justice to this topic. I hope this will ignite a passion to study this further, Preskill's book is also amazing for beginners. I would like to see more videos about Quantum Complexity .
Thank you for putting that Quantum Complexity interview . Also I am thankful for Y Combinator 's Startup Rigetti, leading us in quantum supremacy. This channel is treasure
"Many a true word is spoken in jest", and puns must be the top of the list for nearly true approximations, so "leaky branes" is a favourite concept from Professor Preskill's observations. Because in an overall analog computation of QM in which the knowledge, the information accumulated in every individual's brain, is constantly changing and accessing that information is contingent on the various methodological approaches by which it's stored and retreived, the "truth" changes in every shift of context, just like a Quantum Computer must. The superposition of QM-Time is emulated by modular templates of experience integrating the dominant probabilities, sum-of-all-history in each sub context.., all in one.
And it's "all interference" along different paths of one sort or another.
Quantum Computers will be Savant ability Librarians, a less leaky, but also less synthesizing extension of human brains.., that's what is possible, ..so far it's also the probable way to interpret the WWW.
Good interview, thanks.
best experienced at 1.5 speed (gear icon on the bottom right)
Great job with this.
Can two minds be quantumly entangled?
Yes.
No.