Such a simple object, yet it has played such a role in all of modern physics. Cygnus X-1 was what the real Star Wars was about. I love the discussions it's great to see. Thx phil!
1) In geometry and topology, a key property of a dimension is whether or not it contains an enclosing boundary or horizon. The 0-dimension is the only one that inherently has such an enclosing boundary (the point itself). 2) This aligns with the observation from number theory that only zero, representing a state of complete "local realism", has a true event horizon separating interior from exterior. 3) The positive integer dimensions 1D, 2D, 3D etc. do not intrinsically contain isolating boundaries. This could provide a geometric argument for why they cannot possess event horizons in the same way. 4) If we extend this logic to considering potential higher dimensions, we can make an insightful case that the first higher dimension beyond 3D space that could host an event horizon would be 10D. This is because 10D contains a 0D subspace that could represent such an enclosing boundary. 5) Black holes, with their event horizons being a key defining feature, would then require elevating their geometric description to be fundamentally 10-dimensional objects to accommodate this boundary. 6) This coheres with Leibniz's proposal that since monads are 0D "subjects" that create/source phenomena, they could represent a dimensionless quantum realm. While black holes as 10D "objects" with horizons could represent cosmological sinks that destroy/eliminate phenomena. 7) Such a perspective helps elevate and provide new physical and geometric underpinnings for Leibniz's monadology separating the realms of metaphysical creators (monads) from the physical world of objects (higher dimensions). Bringing Leibniz's ideas about monads back into dialogue with modern physics and geometry could potentially shed new light on longstanding mysteries like: - The fundamental nature of space, time and dimensions - What defines the boundary between the quantum and classical realms - How to reconcile the non-locality of quantum entanglement with relativistic space-time - Unifying gravity with the other forces in a quantum theory of everything Even if not the full story, revisiting Leibniz's monadology and principle of relationals through the modern lens of higher dimensions, topology, and theories of quantum gravity could provide fertile new avenues of theoretical exploration. The potential connections outlined are highly compelling reasons to re-examine his philosophical mathematics. Can contradictions and paradoxes in non-zero dimensions (1D-4D) be resolvable from a 0D perspective? From a 0D perspective, which we might think of as a dimensionless point or a monad (knower) in Leibnizian terms, we could potentially view higher-dimensional paradoxes as artifacts of our dimensional thinking. The 0D viewpoint might offer a way to see the underlying unity or simplicity behind seemingly contradictory higher-dimensional phenomena. For example, quantum entanglement paradoxes in 3D space might be resolved if we consider that from a dimensionless perspective, there's no separation between entangled particles. The apparent non-locality could be an illusion created by our 3D viewpoint.
In a general sense, I discovered that invisibility is the inverse form of holodecks; background scenery and volumetric holograms (holographic in general, bulk and brane). You turn an invisible object outside-in, you'll have a holodeck. Turn a holodeck inside-out, you'll get an invisible object again, but only in one strict setting. Namely, the one which blends in perfectly with the outward facing holodeck which attempts to be invisible in our reality. This curious asymmetry begs the existence of a multiversal option in which there are an infinite number of realities in which there is perfect symmetry between the two. You can make space disappear. Rolf Landauer's Principle: Wherever information is erased, it must reappear somewhere else. ER=EPR says that spacetime itself is entangled information. If you could make spacetime invisible, you can make it appear somewhere else. The first notion of portals! Yes! You can make spacetime disappear and reappear somewhere else! You don't make an object invisible. You make the entire spacetime that it rests in, disappear. Nature abhors a visual vacuum. The space around a boundary of a volume of spacetime made invisible quickly fills in this void. This is kind of like the thermal dynamics of spacetime in an invisible and holographic multiverse. These are ideas of two sides of the same coin for a complete description of reality: An Invisible/Holographic Principle of the Multiverse!😊
I'm wondering how we know that a given gravity wave signature has maintained its integrity from its source. The waves may have fluctuations over time if there was inference, I assume, and possibly after measuring enough of them we could tell a "clean" signal from a disturbed one. And the energy of blackholes being expressed through gravity waves doesn't break the third law of thermodynamics because it is just an energy transfer not a loss or arrival to zero and entanglement may then break the third law, by the way....
There are no black holes. Einstein wrote in 1939 - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (he was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to dilation. It's the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". This does not mean mass increases, it means mass becomes spread throughout spacetime relative to an outside observer. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated. It occurs wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, this includes the centers of high mass stars and the majority of galaxy centers. This has been accepted for a long time. Dilation is occurring in our own galactic center. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. More precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. It's the "missing mass" needed to explain galaxy rotation curves. It doesn't occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has recently been confirmed in 6 ultra diffuse galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have normal rotation rates, in other words they have no dark matter/dilated mass.
What really amazes me is that "black holes" today have no relation to what the concept originally was. Why insist they are "black holes" at all? Black holes don't exist, so whatever you are witnessing out there... let the data tell you what it is.
One would look into the emitting phase waves of particles via CERN ??? due to every element(and part there of) is a reaction system within its self and against its environment ( the energies around it) due to the emittance of phase waves, know there strengths (for all types are different) and know how to manipulate the latter mentioned= new types of instruments to measure said phase waves = your future in a space environment via mk11 to mk v craft and blackhole farming.
Quantum Cyclic Cosmology Time is a compact dimension one single Planck second in size. This creates limits and a phase space of action. From minima Lambda, to maxima, event horizon. Related to motion from zero to c. The gradient between these limits, Lambda and event horizon, we call gravity. And the limits connect. In at event horizon Out in deep void
Thank you so much for this amazing video! I need some advice: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How can I transfer them to Binance?
Things happen faster away from galaxies and things happen slower near a gravitational well. There’s no gravity without massive amounts of matter. There’s also no measurable distance without massive amounts of matter and there is no measurable amount of time without massive amounts matter. (No gravity no distance and no time without the existence of the formation of massive amounts of matter.) Time is accelerated and distance is stretched between all of the supermassive black holes in the universe. Stretched means there is *less* measured distance and *faster* clocks, *both of which* contribute to a faster rate of causation and a faster speed of light compared to where there is more gravity where distance is not as stretched and time runs slower where we are. If you can understand this, you can understand general relativity and you can see why there is no need for dark matter because causation is faster the farther away from the center of the galaxy it is. Dark energy is not needed either because the vacuum of space is from black holes that are growing by absorbing spacetime regardless of the amount of matter is being absorbed. This is the opposite of inflation. So the redshift is known to be from light leaving a galaxy and in a sense the farther away the source of the light is, the more the accumulation gravity it is leaving behind so the more redshifted the light is so that when the light enters the much smaller mass of our galaxy, the light is only slightly blueshifted back to its original spectrum. It’s really not even hard to understand or explain.
No wonder my orange, rosemary glazed ham was a freaking hit: I approach cooking scientifically, as to getting it the right amount of tender, a good flavor distribution... there's real chemistry at works, and chemistry would be nothing without physics! IOW: My ham was in all general and special relativity, relative to a great evening!😋
Two mysteries; the tangible and the non-tangible to become known as what they are exactly. Of course physics does not deal with the non-tangible. That is why consciousness is ‘the hard problem’ for philosophy and philosophers as it appears to be non-tangible and owes no debt to matter.
This is new physics, it shows hidden variables to study gravity, with a rational demonstration of the non-existence of dark matter. th-cam.com/video/b5TU-YJrMVE/w-d-xo.html
Most of them are so into their quantum mechanical regime, that they have no problem saying that quantum mechanic violating GR is no problem, but GR violating quantum mechanic means that something is wrong with GR and has to be fixed by quantum effects. I think GR is a much more fundamental theory, since it describes the very arena where quantum mechanics takes place, so if "information" is lost, then maybe that is the case.They need to adapt quantum mechanics so that it does not violate GR.
You make progress in physics by not violating any laws and finding what must be true to keep them from being violated in places where they are in confiict, not by deciding arbitrarily which ones you can violate. Firewalls mean that either the information gets out through something besides Hawking radiation or our understanding of local quantum field theory is wrong and we need something like the islands program. Unitarity being violated is not an acceptable solution. It would have been like deciding either motion isn’t relative or light’s speed isn’t constant back in the days before special relativity.
⊂(^(工)^)⊃ A black hole is an anarchy computer intelligently designed for the police that TH-cam song blue on black. They won't have anarchy blindness and will benefit from anarchy. The imagination of the universe is anarchy poems. I went completely through a black hole with an anarchy poem and they made a rendering with video game technology that was better than a picture.
Absolutely beatifull!! Thanks for the video 👏👏
your welcome and thanks for your comment
Amazing!! Love physics news ❤
@Metalogic-i6p thanks glad you liked it
Wonderful video! So exciting!
@@andystewart9701 thanks
Absolute interesting subject, thank you!!!
youre welcome thanks so much
Such a simple object, yet it has played such a role in all of modern physics. Cygnus X-1 was what the real Star Wars was about. I love the discussions it's great to see. Thx phil!
cheers, you are welcome
1) In geometry and topology, a key property of a dimension is whether or not it contains an enclosing boundary or horizon. The 0-dimension is the only one that inherently has such an enclosing boundary (the point itself).
2) This aligns with the observation from number theory that only zero, representing a state of complete "local realism", has a true event horizon separating interior from exterior.
3) The positive integer dimensions 1D, 2D, 3D etc. do not intrinsically contain isolating boundaries. This could provide a geometric argument for why they cannot possess event horizons in the same way.
4) If we extend this logic to considering potential higher dimensions, we can make an insightful case that the first higher dimension beyond 3D space that could host an event horizon would be 10D. This is because 10D contains a 0D subspace that could represent such an enclosing boundary.
5) Black holes, with their event horizons being a key defining feature, would then require elevating their geometric description to be fundamentally 10-dimensional objects to accommodate this boundary.
6) This coheres with Leibniz's proposal that since monads are 0D "subjects" that create/source phenomena, they could represent a dimensionless quantum realm. While black holes as 10D "objects" with horizons could represent cosmological sinks that destroy/eliminate phenomena.
7) Such a perspective helps elevate and provide new physical and geometric underpinnings for Leibniz's monadology separating the realms of metaphysical creators (monads) from the physical world of objects (higher dimensions).
Bringing Leibniz's ideas about monads back into dialogue with modern physics and geometry could potentially shed new light on longstanding mysteries like:
- The fundamental nature of space, time and dimensions
- What defines the boundary between the quantum and classical realms
- How to reconcile the non-locality of quantum entanglement with relativistic space-time
- Unifying gravity with the other forces in a quantum theory of everything
Even if not the full story, revisiting Leibniz's monadology and principle of relationals through the modern lens of higher dimensions, topology, and theories of quantum gravity could provide fertile new avenues of theoretical exploration. The potential connections outlined are highly compelling reasons to re-examine his philosophical mathematics.
Can contradictions and paradoxes in non-zero dimensions (1D-4D) be resolvable from a 0D perspective?
From a 0D perspective, which we might think of as a dimensionless point or a monad (knower) in Leibnizian terms, we could potentially view higher-dimensional paradoxes as artifacts of our dimensional thinking. The 0D viewpoint might offer a way to see the underlying unity or simplicity behind seemingly contradictory higher-dimensional phenomena.
For example, quantum entanglement paradoxes in 3D space might be resolved if we consider that from a dimensionless perspective, there's no separation between entangled particles. The apparent non-locality could be an illusion created by our 3D viewpoint.
In a general sense, I discovered that invisibility is the inverse form of holodecks; background scenery and volumetric holograms (holographic in general, bulk and brane). You turn an invisible object outside-in, you'll have a holodeck. Turn a holodeck inside-out, you'll get an invisible object again, but only in one strict setting. Namely, the one which blends in perfectly with the outward facing holodeck which attempts to be invisible in our reality. This curious asymmetry begs the existence of a multiversal option in which there are an infinite number of realities in which there is perfect symmetry between the two.
You can make space disappear. Rolf Landauer's Principle: Wherever information is erased, it must reappear somewhere else. ER=EPR says that spacetime itself is entangled information. If you could make spacetime invisible, you can make it appear somewhere else. The first notion of portals! Yes! You can make spacetime disappear and reappear somewhere else! You don't make an object invisible. You make the entire spacetime that it rests in, disappear. Nature abhors a visual vacuum. The space around a boundary of a volume of spacetime made invisible quickly fills in this void. This is kind of like the thermal dynamics of spacetime in an invisible and holographic multiverse. These are ideas of two sides of the same coin for a complete description of reality: An Invisible/Holographic Principle of the Multiverse!😊
I'm wondering how we know that a given gravity wave signature has maintained its integrity from its source. The waves may have fluctuations over time if there was inference, I assume, and possibly after measuring enough of them we could tell a "clean" signal from a disturbed one. And the energy of blackholes being expressed through gravity waves doesn't break the third law of thermodynamics because it is just an energy transfer not a loss or arrival to zero and entanglement may then break the third law, by the way....
Hi Phil. Greetings from Modern Atheism!
greetings
Great that netta has been included in it wonderful. Please also add Ahmed almheiri Don marlof also agree on me when I said it also suvrat raju
thanks will look into his work
Agree on Ahmed almehiri its a very Smart guy
Light can travel faster than c in one direction but causality of the round trip must be preserved.
There are no black holes. Einstein wrote in 1939 -
"The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (he was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
He was referring to dilation. It's the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". This does not mean mass increases, it means mass becomes spread throughout spacetime relative to an outside observer. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated.
It occurs wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, this includes the centers of high mass stars and the majority of galaxy centers. This has been accepted for a long time.
Dilation is occurring in our own galactic center. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. More precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. It's the "missing mass" needed to explain galaxy rotation curves.
It doesn't occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has recently been confirmed in 6 ultra diffuse galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have normal rotation rates, in other words they have no dark matter/dilated mass.
What really amazes me is that "black holes" today have no relation to what the concept originally was. Why insist they are "black holes" at all? Black holes don't exist, so whatever you are witnessing out there... let the data tell you what it is.
We need bigger detectors, deeper theories, sharper brains. And ideally they should all be balanced to work out succcessfully
One would look into the emitting phase waves of particles via CERN ??? due to every element(and part there of) is a reaction system within its self and against its environment ( the energies around it) due to the emittance of phase waves, know there strengths (for all types are different) and know how to manipulate the latter mentioned= new types of instruments to measure said phase waves = your future in a space environment via mk11 to mk v craft and blackhole farming.
Quantum Cyclic Cosmology
Time is a compact dimension one single Planck second in size. This creates limits and a phase space of action. From minima Lambda, to maxima, event horizon. Related to motion from zero to c.
The gradient between these limits, Lambda and event horizon, we call gravity.
And the limits connect.
In at event horizon
Out in deep void
Thank you so much for this amazing video! I need some advice: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How can I transfer them to Binance?
Things happen faster away from galaxies and things happen slower near a gravitational well. There’s no gravity without massive amounts of matter. There’s also no measurable distance without massive amounts of matter and there is no measurable amount of time without massive amounts matter. (No gravity no distance and no time without the existence of the formation of massive amounts of matter.)
Time is accelerated and distance is stretched between all of the supermassive black holes in the universe. Stretched means there is *less* measured distance and *faster* clocks, *both of which* contribute to a faster rate of causation and a faster speed of light compared to where there is more gravity where distance is not as stretched and time runs slower where we are.
If you can understand this, you can understand general relativity and you can see why there is no need for dark matter because causation is faster the farther away from the center of the galaxy it is.
Dark energy is not needed either because the vacuum of space is from black holes that are growing by absorbing spacetime regardless of the amount of matter is being absorbed. This is the opposite of inflation. So the redshift is known to be from light leaving a galaxy and in a sense the farther away the source of the light is, the more the accumulation gravity it is leaving behind so the more redshifted the light is so that when the light enters the much smaller mass of our galaxy, the light is only slightly blueshifted back to its original spectrum.
It’s really not even hard to understand or explain.
No wonder my orange, rosemary glazed ham was a freaking hit: I approach cooking scientifically, as to getting it the right amount of tender, a good flavor distribution... there's real chemistry at works, and chemistry would be nothing without physics! IOW: My ham was in all general and special relativity, relative to a great evening!😋
What is a black hole atheist?
Two mysteries; the tangible and the non-tangible to become known as what they are exactly. Of course physics does not deal with the non-tangible. That is why consciousness is ‘the hard problem’ for philosophy and philosophers as it appears to be non-tangible and owes no debt to matter.
This is new physics, it shows hidden variables to study gravity, with a rational demonstration of the non-existence of dark matter. th-cam.com/video/b5TU-YJrMVE/w-d-xo.html
TH-cam graphics are not reality
my guess - lots of null results
we learn from those too
Future of black hol “physics” or “maths”
Most of them are so into their quantum mechanical regime, that they have no problem saying that quantum mechanic violating GR is no problem, but GR violating quantum mechanic means that something is wrong with GR and has to be fixed by quantum effects. I think GR is a much more fundamental theory, since it describes the very arena where quantum mechanics takes place, so if "information" is lost, then maybe that is the case.They need to adapt quantum mechanics so that it does not violate GR.
You make progress in physics by not violating any laws and finding what must be true to keep them from being violated in places where they are in confiict, not by deciding arbitrarily which ones you can violate. Firewalls mean that either the information gets out through something besides Hawking radiation or our understanding of local quantum field theory is wrong and we need something like the islands program. Unitarity being violated is not an acceptable solution. It would have been like deciding either motion isn’t relative or light’s speed isn’t constant back in the days before special relativity.
⊂(^(工)^)⊃ A black hole is an anarchy computer intelligently designed for the police that TH-cam song blue on black. They won't have anarchy blindness and will benefit from anarchy. The imagination of the universe is anarchy poems. I went completely through a black hole with an anarchy poem and they made a rendering with video game technology that was better than a picture.
Hopefully people stop wasting their time on mathematical fantasies. Imagine what could be accomplished if they put their minds to physical reality?
Future of black hole physics: more useless speculations.
How do you make progress with speculation?
Did you not watch the video or is it that you do not understand physics?
I moved on when the long haired “scientist”described himself as a rockstar. Thanks for saving me time.
First like, first comment.
thanks
It's an absolutely stunning achievement in TH-cam history. We're all simply in awe of you.
@@alistair_maldacena thanks very much
@@PhilHalper1 Haha I was replying sarcastically to the first guy, but your work is genuinely amazing, Phil. Cheers!
@@alistair_maldacena lol
Tanko scienceman tong aknolege partical fisiks rong and exhaustored.