thank you sir....I'm from India your lectured helped a lot in my subject of international business.....hope world accept and built free trade agreement ....less war .....#piece
Thank you sir! much appreciated! It would be really great if you could make more videos explaining the marxists theories regarding free trade and international relations in general :)
Thanks a lot .Your expression is very understandable. It would be really useful if you could make more videos about other area of " political science" and especially theoretical issues.
Hi sir, hope you are doing well. Your videos are helping me a lot as I am preparing for my exams. Can you some how manage to upload more videos on IR related topics. Thanks
Wouldn't it make more sense for countries to focus on building a well-rounded highly skilled population that can specialise in multiple fields so they don't have to depend on other countries for products and services?
Yah, I am 100% in favor of a completely free market capitalist economy and completely free trade. My only issue with free trade deals, however, is that they (by definition) have government involvement. I don't want free trade deals. I want our country to simply remove all of our barriers to free trade with every other country. My view is simple: "Government, stay out of our economy." Remove all tarrifs and remove all regulations. Let the people interact economically with one another as they see fit, without government interference in our lives.
educational. thanks. i like things explained simply. i don't feel the need to know all the intricacies of the economic system. i don't believe it will ever balance itself out because it is based on the old system of rulers and the ruled. this trade and reciprocity you talk about isn't for the everyday person. it is for the rich to gain and the workers to buy. there is no way that every person in the world will create a business to enjoy this free trade. most people will work to create these products and buy them. this economic system will never work. this free trade is simply removing obstacles for the rich to get richer. a world economy will never work either. but if we simply want to destroy the world then lets do it. WOOOOHOOOO.
No, free trade is basically having the right to do whatever you want when it comes to trade. Making more wealth can be a by product since nothing is stopping you from for instance to gain 1 trillions dollars through slavery if you want to. "Free trade" can limit someone's wealth due to competition, having the freedom to shyster people out of their wealth which is also a high demand besides slavery, and a conflict of interests. "a world economy will never work either." Yes it can and saying otherwise is one factor helping certain rich people to get richer and control the market.
Free trade means that a worker will be able to buy things cheaper than before. It would mean that on a global level resources are used to maximize production. No need to have under-producing farms to feed the people in one part of the world when you can import food and allocate resources in producing what is best produced in that part of the world.
i11011011001 No, that's the market based on demand and the demand is cheaper stuff. Free trade itself doesn't always entail cheaper services, it's just not segregated trade.
Why else would you import stuff, if you can make them in your country, if not for the imported being cheaper? If you can not make them in your country there is no reason for import taxes (other than bureaucracy)
Good stuff but it would be a bit better if it differentiated between so-called "free trade" and what practically all FT agreements are "managed-trade" agreements. Perhaps better articulation that true free trade is a perfectly natural state of affairs. However, because prevailing mercantilist mindsets typically have interrupted that natural state for so long, removing the barriers may have become thought of as "building".
A bit of your logic is flawed. You state free trade isn't natural because people had to work to remove obstacles in order to achieve free trade. These obstacles, however, are artificially created upon false premises and paranoia. If we exam smaller systems, even on the community level, trade exists, naturally too. So the fact that imaginary lines on map and the masters thereof hinder trade does not mean it isn't natural. Therefore they are unnatural, not free trade.
+Kunschner Great point. This was Orwell's lesson, not to term words in Simple English to mean something so far removed from the original meaning that it would mean the opposite. Free trade has become a node for discussion, and what they focus on then is "Free Trade Zones", which are basically a way for Western nations to exploit workers and get their goods into the country cheaper, and sometimes without running them through customs, because they are used in manufacturing at the same spot, which then are put through customs. On your point, national borders today are the result of a long time, a lot of conflict, a lot of migration back and fro, and there's also a lot of natural borders. not to say things don't change, of course. They change all the time too.
You have that backwards. Free trade is the natural state and tariffs and other barriers are what was erected. A move to freer trade is tearing down those barriers not building something.
Isn't there a natural connection between the degree to which true free trade can be practised and the convertibility of the currencies used by the countries engaging in the trade. In particular doesn't a country which uses a fiat currency like the US dollar have a perpetual advantage over another country which does not with which is trading ? The country with fiat currency can simply print as much of it as found necessary to maintain it's advantage in absolute terms and the fictionalised concept of a national debt for that currency has no theoretical limits.
![[Official Music Video] ฝังใจ - BOW Maylada [Prod. By Tan LIPTA]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rSjk1jKWRN4/mqdefault.jpg)
Please make another video series. I learned a lot from you Sir. Hope this so much. Thankyou.
thank you sir....I'm from India your lectured helped a lot in my subject of international business.....hope world accept and built free trade agreement ....less war .....#piece
Well, this one was very helpfull, it is an innovative way to "teach" and have a straight impact on student's mind. Keep up the good work!
Thank you sir! much appreciated! It would be really great if you could make more videos explaining the marxists theories regarding free trade and international relations in general :)
Thanks a lot .Your expression is very understandable. It would be really useful if you could make more videos about other area of " political science" and especially theoretical issues.
This will definitely be useful for my exam in 10 days, much appreciated.
Thank you very much Allen Sens. Your explanation is very clear and im thankful for that. All the best!
Thank you for valuable information. Real benefit
thank u so much i love you teacher you have done all could to make us get done on this thank u God bless youuuuuuuiuu bye
"In time of war, we blockade enemies. In time of peace, we do to ourselves with tariffs, what enemies do to us in time of war"
Henry George
Thank you sir. I would love to have you as my lecture in my uni. You look kind and so informative. Again, thank you!
Expensive explanation sir
Great video
Does your free trade include free movement of both capital and labour??? 🤔
I finally understand free trade! Thanks!
Best teacher!
Thank you for this video Sir! Very clear explanation of the concept indeed. All the best
nice creations by professor..
very good lesson and it's very useful... please I would like if you get time .. state responsibility of interntional affairs.. thanks
Thanks for your video and it helps me a lot.
Hi sir, hope you are doing well. Your videos are helping me a lot as I am preparing for my exams. Can you some how manage to upload more videos on IR related topics. Thanks
Wouldn't it make more sense for countries to focus on building a well-rounded highly skilled population that can specialise in multiple fields so they don't have to depend on other countries for products and services?
Easier said than done... When you get to helm of affairs, this view of yours will definitely change.
very comprehensive lecture...a bundle of thanks
The Bob Ross of economics
It is Good and Understandable
awesome way of teaching in a easy way..keep up the good work..:)
Yah, I am 100% in favor of a completely free market capitalist economy and completely free trade. My only issue with free trade deals, however, is that they (by definition) have government involvement. I don't want free trade deals. I want our country to simply remove all of our barriers to free trade with every other country. My view is simple: "Government, stay out of our economy." Remove all tarrifs and remove all regulations. Let the people interact economically with one another as they see fit, without government interference in our lives.
Very helpful way of teaching. Thank you for uploading.
this was awesome! This completely helped me in my studies THANK YOU!
educational. thanks. i like things explained simply. i don't feel the need to know all the intricacies of the economic system. i don't believe it will ever balance itself out because it is based on the old system of rulers and the ruled. this trade and reciprocity you talk about isn't for the everyday person. it is for the rich to gain and the workers to buy. there is no way that every person in the world will create a business to enjoy this free trade. most people will work to create these products and buy them. this economic system will never work. this free trade is simply removing obstacles for the rich to get richer. a world economy will never work either. but if we simply want to destroy the world then lets do it. WOOOOHOOOO.
No, free trade is basically having the right to do whatever you want when it comes to trade. Making more wealth can be a by product since nothing is stopping you from for instance to gain 1 trillions dollars through slavery if you want to. "Free trade" can limit someone's wealth due to competition, having the freedom to shyster people out of their wealth which is also a high demand besides slavery, and a conflict of interests.
"a world economy will never work either."
Yes it can and saying otherwise is one factor helping certain rich people to get richer and control the market.
Free trade means that a worker will be able to buy things cheaper than before.
It would mean that on a global level resources are used to maximize production. No need to have under-producing farms to feed the people in one part of the world when you can import food and allocate resources in producing what is best produced in that part of the world.
i11011011001 No, that's the market based on demand and the demand is cheaper stuff. Free trade itself doesn't always entail cheaper services, it's just not segregated trade.
Why else would you import stuff, if you can make them in your country, if not for the imported being cheaper?
If you can not make them in your country there is no reason for import taxes (other than bureaucracy)
thank you so much, the most understandable one than other videos
Thanks really useful thanks
En un libre mercado, ¿como se beneficiaría un pais como Haiti de intentar comerciar algo con Estados Unidos?,
Good stuff but it would be a bit better if it differentiated between so-called "free trade" and what practically all FT agreements are "managed-trade" agreements. Perhaps better articulation that true free trade is a perfectly natural state of affairs. However, because prevailing mercantilist mindsets typically have interrupted that natural state for so long, removing the barriers may have become thought of as "building".
thank you for this video. really helpful
.
Please do a video on "Free Ports" or "Free Trade Ports"
very easy to undrstnd.. thanks!
If you are still there I would love to request for some videos on Int Law
A bit of your logic is flawed. You state free trade isn't natural because people had to work to remove obstacles in order to achieve free trade. These obstacles, however, are artificially created upon false premises and paranoia. If we exam smaller systems, even on the community level, trade exists, naturally too. So the fact that imaginary lines on map and the masters thereof hinder trade does not mean it isn't natural. Therefore they are unnatural, not free trade.
+Kunschner Great point. This was Orwell's lesson, not to term words in Simple English to mean something so far removed from the original meaning that it would mean the opposite. Free trade has become a node for discussion, and what they focus on then is "Free Trade Zones", which are basically a way for Western nations to exploit workers and get their goods into the country cheaper, and sometimes without running them through customs, because they are used in manufacturing at the same spot, which then are put through customs.
On your point, national borders today are the result of a long time, a lot of conflict, a lot of migration back and fro, and there's also a lot of natural borders. not to say things don't change, of course. They change all the time too.
Nice video thanks
Got it, thank you
Thank you so much for the upload.
You have that backwards. Free trade is the natural state and tariffs and other barriers are what was erected. A move to freer trade is tearing down those barriers not building something.
Great videos ... keep them coming
thanks great video!!!
I never knew they gave Phd's in economics to people's hands...I guess since it is able to talk it makes sense.
Very very helpful. Thank you for this video.
Isn't there a natural connection between the degree to which true free trade can be practised and the convertibility of the currencies used by the countries engaging in the trade. In particular doesn't a country which uses a fiat currency like the US dollar have a perpetual advantage over another country which does not with which is trading ? The country with fiat currency can simply print as much of it as found necessary to maintain it's advantage in absolute terms and the fictionalised concept of a national debt for that currency has no theoretical limits.
I think that if a currency is abused then eventually it will fall to it's true value (zero)
Correct, you can't endless print money without affecting the value of you currency.
subtitle please many thanks
More freetrade, more peace!? Not more as a theory!
Sounds like a fairytale
gnaharam
العلم ماله عمر
This guy was hired by the oligarchy.
Pathetic accusation.
Reminds me of communism
All of these socialists complaining...I'll take my imperfect real world economy any day over socialist human farming.
THIS WAS TERRIBLE
This sucks
free trade is dumb