Why Platonic Solids Are the Most Mind-Blowing Secrets of the Universe!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 73

  • @annedavis6090
    @annedavis6090 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    i recently received my set of pyrite platonic solids. They are the size of marbles, very effective meditation tools and are really enjoyable to just look at.

  • @mikemaurer3320
    @mikemaurer3320 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Do these Platonic solids come from the flower of life?

    • @eldonfabi2674
      @eldonfabi2674 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes, it's all connected!

  • @BangladeshTheBest
    @BangladeshTheBest 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Icosahedron was actually connected to the "aether" not the "universe"

  • @krissantos5170
    @krissantos5170 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4:30 Isosahedron

  • @hindsight2022
    @hindsight2022 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The octahedron does not count. It is just two tetrahedrons linked . At the base

    • @hindsight2022
      @hindsight2022 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Perhaps it is there as a trap to protect the true hidden knowledge .

    • @notryansnyder
      @notryansnyder 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Not true. Tetrahedron has a triangular base. Octahedron is two pyramids linked at a square base.

  • @tamarahall1623
    @tamarahall1623 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    444 views

  • @alpetterson9452
    @alpetterson9452 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I would LOVE to see an ACTUAL Platonic Solid. To hold one in my hands and marvel at its precision. Unfortunately they CANNOT exist. Zoom into ANY of these solids and you will find that they are imperfect. They only exist as fantasies.

    • @chriscook2479
      @chriscook2479 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe

    • @YourJamaicanbabyTM
      @YourJamaicanbabyTM 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Imagine we live in an amalgation of the Platonic solids.
      We just can’t see it, nor prove it.
      Unless we step outside it.
      Fractals of the perfection exist in nature. I assure you.

    • @nielspeterborgennielsen1386
      @nielspeterborgennielsen1386 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      You can see several videoes how people make Platonic Solids in various ways and with great precision.
      I have made some myself once in the 80's from glass so I could fill them with water like huge prisms.
      Now also in wood and iron. 😊

    • @alpetterson9452
      @alpetterson9452 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I wasn't talking about 'great' precision, I was talking about EXACTNESS. Perfection. If a platonic solid isn't perfect its not a platonic solid. @@nielspeterborgennielsen1386

    • @CthtoNicfly5
      @CthtoNicfly5 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Your hand is the Phiratio and is made of all five.

  • @DD-gi6kx
    @DD-gi6kx หลายเดือนก่อน

    what a bunch of nonsense, the only association to the elements is someone saying there is

    • @SymbolSage
      @SymbolSage  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I get where you're coming from-different perspectives can definitely lead to different interpretations!

  • @Steverogers220
    @Steverogers220 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I think these so called platonic solids are useless

    • @eldonfabi2674
      @eldonfabi2674 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There are not

    • @huntercampbell3743
      @huntercampbell3743 12 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Only to useless people are they useless

  • @Steverogers220
    @Steverogers220 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fake as hell

  • @ben.paul.shep111
    @ben.paul.shep111 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Love your channel brother but at @34 seconds, three of the elemental associations you show aren't right.
    Fire with the Tetra & Earth with the Hexa are correct, but its meant to be Octa w Air, Icosa w Water, & Dodeca w Ether.

    • @elron117
      @elron117 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also the sacral chakra's whereabouts are wrong.

    • @BuShips
      @BuShips 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      At 6:30 you showed the cuboctahedron which is an Archimedean solid. It is the cube and octahedron combined. At 7:00 you showed the rhombic dodecahedron which is the dual of the cuboctahedron. I found a video saying that the rhombic dodecahedron is the sixth Platonic solid but only in the fourth dimension. I would like to know WHEN this was discovered. Do you know?

    • @asb9521
      @asb9521 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ok Dodeca with Ether makes more sense I thoght it looked off

    • @gnosis8142
      @gnosis8142 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BuShips - there is a sixth. In a video called "Perfect Shapes in Higher Dimensions - Numberphile".

    • @BuShips
      @BuShips 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gnosis8142 Ok, I remember that from a number of years ago. The one I really like is called There Are Six Platonic Solids by Stand-Up Math. It was a year older (8) than the one you mentioned. A few months ago I purchased four puzzle-toys that can shape shift. I was able to make a pair of Rhombic Dodecahedrons by using two of the toys to make into cubes which I placed inside of them.

  • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
    @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    All we would need is spherical geometry to arise naturally in the Universe and it could form a process of spherical symmetry forming and breaking forming the potential for the Plato’s idea of a realm of forms. As a continuous, on-going, process this geometry could form entropy, disorganization, with the potential for evermore complexity. Forming not just physical complexity, Platonic Solids and cell life, but also the potential for evermore-abstract mathematics.

  • @MarcoAurelio-sv2tk
    @MarcoAurelio-sv2tk 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Maybe this isn't sacred at all. The Metatron's cube may be the blueprint of the prison of the mind. The matrix's blueprint. Just saying...

    • @midnightsplusnoonsis730LEO
      @midnightsplusnoonsis730LEO 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂

    • @SpiritAwake
      @SpiritAwake 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True, when my third eye opened I got catapulted in a tunnel at the other end were the Platonic solids. I escaped the matrix for a few minutes

  • @Dougall-y1y
    @Dougall-y1y 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    L578 L571 XA3XN-6
    Egyptian God of the Akashic Libary thecreal one.
    Books of Moses

  • @Caytronyx
    @Caytronyx 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    great video! thank you, brother!

    • @SymbolSage
      @SymbolSage  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My pleasure!

  • @RaymondBCrisp
    @RaymondBCrisp 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Isn't it ironic (don't ya think?) that they associated the tetrahedron with fire, not knowing that the methane molecule is exactly that shape?

  • @Iskenderus
    @Iskenderus 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    simple but huge mistakes from the beginning that I stopped watching you need to reupload the video

    • @SymbolSage
      @SymbolSage  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Hey sorry you were disappointed. Which mistakes - care to point them out?

  • @8wa713
    @8wa713 หลายเดือนก่อน

    junk video, the tone seems professional but the content is actually empty, just introductory, even misleading, without any in-depth proof.

    • @SymbolSage
      @SymbolSage  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We're sorry to hear that the video didn’t meet your expectations. Our goal was to introduce the concept of Platonic solids in an engaging way, but I understand that you were looking for more in-depth analysis. We will definitely keep that in mind for future content. If you have any specific areas or questions you’d like us to explore in more detail, I’d love to hear them.

  • @truegamer2819
    @truegamer2819 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    if i learn more about these unique and powerful and discover its special secrets as being the platonic plates, i would be hunted by every government organization, and i dont want that

    • @SymbolSage
      @SymbolSage  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Knowledge is power!

    • @truegamer2819
      @truegamer2819 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SymbolSage yes it is

  • @Tikiii
    @Tikiii 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great vid 👏

    • @SymbolSage
      @SymbolSage  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you enjoyed it

  • @davidfell4569
    @davidfell4569 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They are mind blowing but after after 2000 years all that is essentially known about them can be written on one sheet of paper.

  • @CHRISDELEEUW
    @CHRISDELEEUW 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    555 .....

  • @dovahkiin3717
    @dovahkiin3717 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What music did you use for this video?

  • @mpendulombhele5036
    @mpendulombhele5036 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😮

  • @jonathanabner5972
    @jonathanabner5972 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How can I present something

    • @SymbolSage
      @SymbolSage  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Present what?

  • @virus-hoax
    @virus-hoax หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I would like to see the chestahedron added to this set of solids. The chestahedron has 7 faces of equal area and also fits inside a sphere. But not all faces are identical. There are 4 identical triangles and 3 identical "kite" shapes.

  • @Dougall-y1y
    @Dougall-y1y 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    XA3XN-6

  • @JoJoRodriguez-WRX
    @JoJoRodriguez-WRX 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hate to burst your guys's bubbles but God created the universe the Almighty Yahweh I understand that these shapes are intriguing and there is mathematical SOME truth to these shapes but these shapes did not create anything they've been around since the beginning of time since God created these platonic solids GOD CREATED EVERYTHING

    • @SymbolSage
      @SymbolSage  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hey thanks for sharing!

    • @erniebermudez8410
      @erniebermudez8410 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yahweh is a lier and a murder. He is not the true God we try to think of. Telling his servants to go kill men, animals and children. Is that what the almighty God of the Universe would do.

    • @ElinaCmd
      @ElinaCmd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The monotheistic guy huh

    • @JellieThePink
      @JellieThePink หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your God called himself he. As in the duality of the feminine and masculine. As in this God is not non-dual, but fundamentally Yang in his nature. This lack of nonduality is evidence enough that this God is tainted by the duality of our world, and not the most high. If there is a God, it is an impersonal empty force of infinite potential, not a personal force. Your parasocial relationship with Yahweh is merely an idol. Just another golden bull.

    • @JoJoRodriguez-WRX
      @JoJoRodriguez-WRX หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JellieThePink You are entitled to your opinion