Work-energy theorem | Work & Energy | Physics | Khan Academy

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 67

  • @darshananath6806
    @darshananath6806 4 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Words can't explain how much I am grateful to this video. GREAT JOB!!!!!

  • @levisaaronlewis3791
    @levisaaronlewis3791 4 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    I can't understand why this video only has 1 500 views on the time of this comment It's so well explained !

  • @nileshrathod3153
    @nileshrathod3153 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Excellent explanation. I totally understood it. Earlier I was really confused about it. Thanks a lot!

  • @vindunknown
    @vindunknown ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I swear to god it's always an Indian guy who does it better . Excellent explanation

  • @rickastleysmicrophone7544
    @rickastleysmicrophone7544 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    12th grader here! You're such a blessing Mr. Mahesh, this video helped me a lot to clear my doubts

  • @ManojGoud-t7u
    @ManojGoud-t7u ปีที่แล้ว

    Since 2k22 I'm following this channel, my total knowledge was gained by the help of this channel i'm very grateful to you . I have changed alot coz of this channel very very big thanks.

  • @anything3068
    @anything3068 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    why dont they teach so good in schools
    ???
    ???

  • @suhaniissar2659
    @suhaniissar2659 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It really healped me .... thankyou sir😀

  • @karunasharma9512
    @karunasharma9512 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir I was looking for exact explanation 😃 video now I have understood after my school n College Life 🤭
    Thanks a lot sir u deserve a lot of thanks 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @bruk1842
    @bruk1842 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    i am confused with the puppy example. you raised the potential energy of the puppy which means you transferred energy to the puppy so how is there no work done blse the definition of work is clearly stated as the amount of energy transferred?

    • @barathbarath8912
      @barathbarath8912 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      i too have the same doubt if you got the ans reply

  • @grahamflowers
    @grahamflowers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There is no kinetic energy in a moving mass there is force Mv squared, kinetic energy is the energy of consistent work from a consistent force regards Graham Flowers

    • @selenalozada1764
      @selenalozada1764 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was wondering the same thing. If work is equal to kinetic energy. Then, did he skip a step when creating connection between kinetic energy and work. When kinetic energy is equal to 1/2 m x v^2. I am very confused...

    • @grahamflowers
      @grahamflowers ปีที่แล้ว

      @@selenalozada1764 Mass is always a constant only velocity changes regards Graham Flowers

  • @noahdangerio9540
    @noahdangerio9540 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The mathematical explanation for work related to kinetic energy was so easy to understand. Thank you!

  • @dakshrajsmindbrainacademyb6606
    @dakshrajsmindbrainacademyb6606 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love you Sir, Best thing this video helped me get 4 marks in my exam 🤩🤩

  • @Hino_55
    @Hino_55 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You cleared my confusion Sir Mahesh, Thankyou!

  • @aamirhooda937
    @aamirhooda937 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Such a clear explanation. Thank you bhai

  • @theophrastusvonhoenheim4022
    @theophrastusvonhoenheim4022 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    how does this only have 200 likes? its an amazing explanation

  • @diegomchenry8676
    @diegomchenry8676 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Im confused about the cupboard. work = force x displacement. In the example, a force was applied and there was displacement so how is there no work?

    • @send_help_to_tas2251
      @send_help_to_tas2251 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There's work done by you thus making you lose energy, which is then gained by the cupboard but just as quickly removed by friction as it does negative work (probably converted into heat and sound) so there is no kinetic energy left in the cupboard

    • @SocialMedia-y7e
      @SocialMedia-y7e 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because friction acts in opp direction , so total work done is zero

  • @MansiDevrukhkar-uz6cx
    @MansiDevrukhkar-uz6cx 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😊Thanks sir,you made this theorem as smooth as butter for me 😊

  • @Decoratewithbestofficia
    @Decoratewithbestofficia 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video is helpful for me 😊
    Thanx you for making this video

  • @priyanshuchauhan3876
    @priyanshuchauhan3876 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A really wonderful explanation thank you sir

  • @fastnoob9327
    @fastnoob9327 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The proof why you solved for every equation makes sense than the thing done in my TBK. I am so happy that I got an explanation something like this

  • @letagomabotha9004
    @letagomabotha9004 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow! So simply explained!

  • @naveedahsan7315
    @naveedahsan7315 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Phenomenal!!!!!!!!!!

  • @varun2247
    @varun2247 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Loved it mahesh sir you are so awesome physics guru

  • @dorapalaparti1977
    @dorapalaparti1977 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful explanation sir😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊.

  • @Confusedpsyco
    @Confusedpsyco ปีที่แล้ว

    Learn alot from this video thank you keep it up❤

  • @ashnakamura2411
    @ashnakamura2411 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    your explanations are great, please make more videos :) Love from England

  • @littleinvention2041
    @littleinvention2041 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir thank u soooooooo much i can't explain how helpful is this video ❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @puttetiki
    @puttetiki ปีที่แล้ว

    Very clear and to the point! Much appreciated! By the way, as a side note, gravity can't push, only pull.

  • @onyourmarksx
    @onyourmarksx ปีที่แล้ว

    That was so helpful thankss!!

  • @ashfauzzamanaronno6606
    @ashfauzzamanaronno6606 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think explaining the first situations as adding/removing kinetic energy is not appropriate since you can't just add or remove energy. there's actually conversion of energy working behind it.

    • @KhanAcademyIndiaEnglish
      @KhanAcademyIndiaEnglish  3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thanks, I think I should have worded that better!
      You can always add/remove energy from any object. It's just that that energy has to come from/go somewhere. In the case of the video, that energy is coming from/going to my body!

  • @pragyanjitozahphukon7201
    @pragyanjitozahphukon7201 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think this video needs more views and likes🥀

  • @gmnahin
    @gmnahin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very underrated......

  • @asmaabashasha2468
    @asmaabashasha2468 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you soooooo much!!! i have an exam three days from now and this has helped me immensely :)

    • @amber5208
      @amber5208 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hve one tommorow 😢😢

  • @johnkilai1447
    @johnkilai1447 ปีที่แล้ว

    thaaaaanks well explained be blessed

  • @shortsprings
    @shortsprings 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The math equation explanation is correct. However, the push cupboard and raise puppy examples need to be broken into two parts: acceleration from rest, and deceleration back to rest. That would be a better explanation.

  • @godwinmakinyiwulimaja
    @godwinmakinyiwulimaja ปีที่แล้ว

    This man is so good 😊

  • @bhawanakanwarshekhawat921
    @bhawanakanwarshekhawat921 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Superb

  • @kareemteniola3634
    @kareemteniola3634 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much well explained

  • @petergoh5628
    @petergoh5628 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For the case of the puppy, isn’t ur work done the gain in gravitational potential energy, mgh? How can it be 0?

    • @drofeng
      @drofeng ปีที่แล้ว

      The work done by the gravitational force is the negative of the change in potential energy. Hence, the work done by an external agent (you) to move the puppy up against the gravitational field is mgh (the total gained potential energy).
      By moving the puppy up slowly (quasi-static, constant velocity, dynamic equilibrium, neglecting inertial effects) i.e. Fnet=F-mg=0 at all times
      If we are talking about the net work done, the net force (Fnet) on the puppy is always zero, and therefore the net work done (by the external agent + the gravitational force) on the puppy is zero

  • @sydneysands4950
    @sydneysands4950 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    SO GOOD THANK YOUUUUUUUUU

  • @NatnaelDaw-cv9bt
    @NatnaelDaw-cv9bt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tank you.

  • @Watch.23
    @Watch.23 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!!!!

  • @abbasiareeb
    @abbasiareeb ปีที่แล้ว

    Great sir

  • @andy_182
    @andy_182 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    KYNETIC energee

  • @Acousticguitar-s8j
    @Acousticguitar-s8j หลายเดือนก่อน

    He sounds exactly like the guy from Floathead physics

  • @AnkitDebnath-fb1jc
    @AnkitDebnath-fb1jc 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can recall Mahesh voice

  • @fusion69
    @fusion69 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice video

  • @vansharora3402
    @vansharora3402 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In the mathematical equation where did the 2 go
    ??

    • @heyyo96
      @heyyo96 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It will be mv^2/2-mu^2/2
      Which will be further 1/2×mv^2 - 1/2×mu^2
      Now, W=K.E final -K.E initial

  • @md.shamimreza5535
    @md.shamimreza5535 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good explanation but there are some misconceptions too!!!

  • @ryancantu9437
    @ryancantu9437 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    how do i get songs out of my head

    • @amber5208
      @amber5208 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Seriously😂😂😭like howwww