This Is Why the U.S. Can’t Use the Oil It Produces

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 2.9K

  • @Dave-ty2qp
    @Dave-ty2qp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1081

    Ever had the feeling that you were being gaslighted?

    • @JohnGrandline
      @JohnGrandline 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thats the only thing a guoveyrnmeynt does hahaha

    • @jerryswope1797
      @jerryswope1797 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      All the time

    • @GoodBoiStuff
      @GoodBoiStuff 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Help me

    • @GoodBoiStuff
      @GoodBoiStuff 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      HELP ME

    • @GoodBoiStuff
      @GoodBoiStuff 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      😭

  • @davidlopez6116
    @davidlopez6116 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +885

    The amount of money we give other countries we can afford to modernize our refineries

    • @justinburcaw1426
      @justinburcaw1426 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      Well absolutely correct, as long as oil production within the US isn't constantly changing because of democratic policy those companies would be willing to make the change. They need a steady steam of production before bothering with. Killing the KeyStone Pipeline was a major key from it never happening.

    • @carlsanders7824
      @carlsanders7824 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      If it made economic sense, then the companies would be doing it.

    • @distilledglass1566
      @distilledglass1566 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      @@carlsanders7824 not necessarily, they do what puts more money in their own pockets not the economy. Trickle down economics does not help the economy.

    • @toomanymarys7355
      @toomanymarys7355 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      EPA makes that cost prohibitive.

    • @John2r1
      @John2r1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@justinburcaw1426 Here's an ideal how about we the people especially those in Democrat states fire the Democrat party. And replace it with anything else that has common sense policies. There are more than two political parties in this country. People are just lazy and don't bother doing research.

  • @joshuagop5909
    @joshuagop5909 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +938

    Yes lets complain about polluting the environment but buy our oil from countries who are less regulated and less safe for the environment instead of just fixing our refineries

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      How young are you, the Us has clean up a lot since 1974

    • @willia3r
      @willia3r 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      @@dknowles60 apparently not enough if concerns about fracking leaking pollutants into the water supply is still a thing.

    • @iamthebroker
      @iamthebroker 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      @@dknowles60makes his point even more valid

    • @phoenixrivenus9270
      @phoenixrivenus9270 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yeah, ok. I guess we should support your agenda.

    • @jtjones4081
      @jtjones4081 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      The Saudis produce crude as cleanly as we do. They’re holding back 1 million barrels per day of production right now to keep the price up.

  • @Mrkeats5487
    @Mrkeats5487 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

    Canada has this very problem as well especially in Alberta and Saskatchewan if we built our own refinery we could look after North America for over 100 years .

    • @Adroit1911
      @Adroit1911 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The maps in this video never showed the known reserves in Alaska either.... North America has plenty of oil.

    • @RyanWeaver-f7m
      @RyanWeaver-f7m หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I have always said that I would way rather buy what we need here in the U.S. from Canada than pretty much everyone else. But, you know, that makes too much sense.

    • @tooterooterville
      @tooterooterville หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, show me an itch and I'll scratch ya one!" - Roger Miller

    • @goinpostal
      @goinpostal 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@RyanWeaver-f7m the leftists are about to be out of office.. then the adults can do some common sense plans

    • @fischerautoprops8931
      @fischerautoprops8931 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      I worked in the oilfields in western Canada for 11 years. We have the cleanest and safest oil retrieval methods in the world.

  • @tedeskam8189
    @tedeskam8189 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    It's all about the money. Find out where the money's going and what group of politicians are profiting from it and you will know why America is suffering with high oil prices.

    • @GearsDatPowerDaTubes
      @GearsDatPowerDaTubes 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      America has extremely affordable oil prices especially relative to Europe. I wouldn't call America's prices "high". Gas prices are actually cheaper where I live then 1 year ago. That commodity has deflated from my perspective. Yes the government is corrupt, but it hasn't affected oil prices.

    • @tooterooterville
      @tooterooterville 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Can you say "Democrat Leadership"?

    • @brucepowell7986
      @brucepowell7986 15 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      the kawmies have made no bones about it they want high fuel prices period

  • @duanenavarre7234
    @duanenavarre7234 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +589

    I live in Oklahoma, had friends and family in the oil business for many decades.
    Most of what they use as excuses are same as the politicians, a bunch of lies.
    Its easier to process the light oil, the heavy oil has more products that can be extracted,
    ie. several profit lines.

    • @coastalhillbilly3419
      @coastalhillbilly3419 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

      Is it true the US has some of the largest, verified, accessible oil and NG in the world?
      If so we could be a very rich country if we did away with w0ke energy, regulations.
      Oil, NG touches every product and endeavor we do.

    • @thomasmcnicholas8656
      @thomasmcnicholas8656 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Well….. it’s true 🤷‍♂️

    • @duanenavarre7234
      @duanenavarre7234 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@coastalhillbilly3419 technically can grow all the oil we want via vertical hydroponics and algae.
      back in the 1960's they just did open ponds for the aquatic species program, with vertical hydroponics
      its much higher production rate. on this platform lookup "33zulu new biofuel".

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@coastalhillbilly3419 YEA

    • @markvalery8632
      @markvalery8632 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      @@coastalhillbilly3419 The country would not be rich, the multi-national oil and gas companies would be rich.

  • @PowerUnicorn
    @PowerUnicorn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +248

    Why didn't this video cover the fact that the US uses over 36 MILLION acres of land AND LOTS of water to produce corn for ethanol? Permian light could easily take its place and the US could use its own production. AND reuse that land to produce food for the US and others.

    • @carlsanders7824
      @carlsanders7824 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Sufficient tax incentives is the only way to get companies to do things they do not presently do because of the economics.

    • @DustinStich-h2i
      @DustinStich-h2i 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      We make too much corn.

    • @goedeck1
      @goedeck1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Permian contaminates a lot of water.

    • @sabin97
      @sabin97 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      i cant speak for the author but i would venture guess it's because this video is about oil and why you dont use your oil as much as you could and instead import a lot of it.

    • @Chris_at_Home
      @Chris_at_Home 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      I saw a study where it takes 1.2 gallons of fossil fuel to make 1 gallon of ethanol. When you take into account everything from fertilizer, farm equipment manufacturing and to keep it running and then the process to make the corn into ethanol I can see where this can be realistic.

  • @3DManShadowland
    @3DManShadowland 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +312

    Totally BS, it is all bureaucracy at it's finest.

    • @tarstarkusz
      @tarstarkusz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The real BS is this guy thinks the US produces 19.4mbd. This is hogwash. Not even close. We produce 12mbd. We use about 20mbd. That's 8 million barrels a day we have to import.

    • @iva4856
      @iva4856 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Is this channel funded by...?

    • @NuncNuncNuncNunc
      @NuncNuncNuncNunc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Spoken like a true internet economist.

    • @tarstarkusz
      @tarstarkusz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@NuncNuncNuncNunc Some of what is in this video is true, but a lot is BS. The US has never produced anywhere near 19.4mb in a single day, ever. It is off by many millions. I have no idea where he is getting these numbers. The EIA and IEA are THE source of oil production. They records going back decades.
      But he is right that a lot of our oil we produce today is entirely unsuitable for our refineries. The US had a very long period of decline in oil production from 1970 to about 2008. IIRC, we got down to about 4mb a day.

    • @buggzo
      @buggzo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@tarstarkusz Alot of those numbers are likely blacked out from the record for emergency war time storage. So OP is likely getting his information straight from the source in that regard ...

  • @Dirtbug473
    @Dirtbug473 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    I'm an Excavating contractor...have a equipment dealer friend. His son works for a huge research lab that builds, invents " air scrubbers" for coal fired power plants. He claims America has the cleanest coal fired plants in the world....as well.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      We Do

    • @wadehathawaymusic
      @wadehathawaymusic 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      ​@dknowles60 That's right, we do. And coal usage is still detrimental to the environment and more expensive than emerging renewable sources.

    • @RobertCampsall
      @RobertCampsall 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You realize that having the "cleanest" coal plants in the world does not mean you have "clean" coal-fired power plants, yes? Even the absolutely cleanest coal fired power plants still means emitting more radioactive particles than ANY nuclear plant, a wide array of toxic sulfur-containing emissions - the kind that leads to acid rain - and a waste sludge that is incredibly toxic to any life form more complicated than a bacteria which we have no means of storing safely (google search for "coal plants waste ponds") in pools of toxic sludge and have previously - many times - had spills that wipe out entire watersheds, and which we have no means of processing to render it harmless.

    • @doranmaxwell1755
      @doranmaxwell1755 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@wadehathawaymusic Not sure what a 'reenable source is'

    • @goat1941
      @goat1941 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@doranmaxwell1755. No such thing. Biggest grift in industrial history to produce energy inefficiently

  • @fairlane19641
    @fairlane19641 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    We better build new oil refineries that can use our oil !

    • @speedbuggy5573
      @speedbuggy5573 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Never Gonna Happen With A Democrat In Office!!

    • @amraceway
      @amraceway หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@speedbuggy5573 Well now Trump is in charge gas will be super cheap.

    • @john-smith.
      @john-smith. หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@amraceway That's what u think....come back in a year when its still not cheaper.

    • @speedbuggy5573
      @speedbuggy5573 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @amraceway And Groceries And Utility Costs Will Be Affordable Again, And The Best Part: No More Illegals, They Will Be Allowed In The Correct Way! Following The Law!!

    • @speedbuggy5573
      @speedbuggy5573 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @john-smith. And why would think it won't be?
      It's President Trump: NOT Joe N Kamala Anymore!

  • @Ryan-ff2db
    @Ryan-ff2db 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +158

    It's manipulation. You don't need to retool every refinery in the US as the US does produce some heavy oils and imports heavy oils from allies, just a few would help a lot. The problem is high prices benefit the oil companies so why would they build a new light sweet refinery, or retool existing refineries, if it doesn't help their bottom line.

    • @jtjones4081
      @jtjones4081 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Bingo!!! You’re one of the few that gets it!

    • @tabuilder
      @tabuilder 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Would you work "overtime" if it didn't benefit you financially?

    • @Ryan-ff2db
      @Ryan-ff2db 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@tabuilder That's not the same thing. I work overtime all the time but it has no impact on national security, the economy, global politics or environmental concerns. Oil checks all those boxes and more.

    • @mrclintc1
      @mrclintc1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The price of oil can either drive up inflation or bring it down.

    • @Ryan-ff2db
      @Ryan-ff2db 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@mrclintc1 Exactly, although the bring it down part doesn't always happen.

  • @SergH.
    @SergH. 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +394

    Let’s be real it comes down to old rich dudes making sure they stay rich. We could use our own oil. We chose not to.

    • @rodica69
      @rodica69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      "We"?

    • @kevinmccoy5099
      @kevinmccoy5099 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      We can use water to drive cars but they want put the cars out they killed the man who came up with it they greedy af

    • @FrederickHopkins-xb6me
      @FrederickHopkins-xb6me 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      The UK had to import Saudi oil even though we were 'oil rich' from the North Sea. North Sea oil was too 'sweet and had to import lower grade oil from Saudi Arabia. Oils come from all over the world to blend them.

    • @jessemills3845
      @jessemills3845 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The FACT IS, THE DEMS ( INCLUDING HARRIS AND BIDEN) HAVE PREVENTED OIL REFINERIES FROM BEING BUILT FOR DECADES!

    • @DK-nx9ri
      @DK-nx9ri 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Omg. Who do you work for?

  • @Avenger886
    @Avenger886 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +252

    Corruption is the reason why..

    • @amzarnacht6710
      @amzarnacht6710 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      1000000000% fact

    • @Musicdudeyoutub
      @Musicdudeyoutub 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Free trade perhaps. Historically, if you're not trading with another country, you're warring with it.

    • @carlsanders7824
      @carlsanders7824 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Give an example.

    • @johndoe-ss9bz
      @johndoe-ss9bz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@carlsanders7824 >>: $$$,$$$,$$$...

    • @blackonblack...9244
      @blackonblack...9244 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yep government regulations is the problem.

  • @craigditzenberger4551
    @craigditzenberger4551 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    When you add the government into a scenario, logic is always thrown out the window!

    • @Leafyjo
      @Leafyjo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The video says building more pipelines, longer distances is massively costly. That's not a government issue. That's a business issue.

    • @jameseverett9037
      @jameseverett9037 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Leafyjo except Biden shut down the pipeline.

    • @RedRiverD007
      @RedRiverD007 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Boy, isn't that the truth!

    • @shadowhound5113
      @shadowhound5113 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Asking the government to care about its citizens is like asking my cat to not eat birds. They can’t do it.

    • @jameseverett9037
      @jameseverett9037 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@shadowhound5113 that's because there is no government to care. There is no one named "Mr" or "Mrs government". It's just selfish people with taxpayer funded jobs, who now get to decide their own salaries and benefits, that are unaccountable to us, unlike anything our founders ever wanted. We allowed it to happen through our niceness and unwillingness to shed blood as it began to be necessary in order to keep them from having and serving their own interests. Also it happened due mostly to good honest people wanting nothing to do with government, and letting corrupt people take those jobs instead.
      In fact, it happen under the very 1st generation after the founders died off. They were stupid enough to support a federal government making war on states, who had every right to leave the Union for any reason or no reason. Yet these nincompoops allowed the government to convince them it was not only right to kill 600,000+ citizens to keep the rest in bondage to our federal government, but somehow necessary. Then they whitewashed the tyrant who pushed all this on us, and now you think he was a great man for freeing slaves, when hardly anything could be further from the truth.
      But that's how it was done - how the government was taken from we, the people. It's ALWAYS going to be done under the flag of some "righteous cause" - ALWAYS. And people will fall for it because they don't bother to understand why the Consitution that should have protected them, is absolute, and MUST not be breeched for ANY reason. But because we let them do it then, and ever since, the Constitution is now just toilet paper that wipes the butts of unelected bureaucrats, and corrupted senators.
      Of course they don't care about us. They don't have to. Why should they? They get their nice paychecks and benefits for doing nothing, and have an army and a bunch of 3 letter agencies full of stupid traitors to us, to make sure they are safe and keep power over us. And we are STILL unwilling to do anything about it, so WHY on Earth would they give up all that power, just to do the right thing, when they don't have to?

  • @seansimone-e6k
    @seansimone-e6k 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    We have a lot more than that away each year. It’s 90% politician policy that’s destroyed the oil industry in the US.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 หลายเดือนก่อน

      YEAH

  • @philipdillard1581
    @philipdillard1581 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    So let that sink in people, light crude is used primarily for fuels, heavy crude for detergents and plastics....the USA has both but mostly light crude. But for some odd reason we aren't building light crude refineries.....

    • @crhu319
      @crhu319 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bad investment with gas mobiles going away.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      You can thank the Fed Gov for that

    • @KyleButler82
      @KyleButler82 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@crhu319 "gas mobiles" aren't going anywhere

    • @Eclipse-ss7ko
      @Eclipse-ss7ko หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think that the oil co are making insane profits by doing both. They sell and buy at hugh profits.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Fed Gov in the Way

  • @axemastersinc3269
    @axemastersinc3269 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

    We must build more processing plants...

    • @erickanter
      @erickanter 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The environmentalists won't let you.

    • @thebookelf2135
      @thebookelf2135 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@erickanterask yourself why

  • @donaldgill86
    @donaldgill86 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +175

    The US can use its own oil, but it would require investment.

    • @darrynruzicka2883
      @darrynruzicka2883 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Investments that should have been taking place 40 years ago till present but do to bought off politicians from lobby money, which is almost all of them, that hasn't happened, etc, etc, etc.....

    • @sabin97
      @sabin97 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      exactly.
      and that investment would be an expense for the rich, and would bring prices down.
      and they want to maximize profits.

    • @jtjones4081
      @jtjones4081 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      It wouldn’t cost all that much relatively speaking to retrofit refineries in the Gulf to refine our light sweet crude. They’ve been making record profits by exporting. It’s not the taxpayers job to pay their expenses.

    • @johnye4433
      @johnye4433 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      As the video said, the US has better technology and makes more money to refine heavy crude, and light crude is better exported because higher prices, so it is like renting out your house in AirBnB, and pay rent to live in your parents basement, everyone is happy

    • @sabin97
      @sabin97 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@johnye4433
      he said light crude is cheaper.
      you refine heavy crude because your refineries were made for that, and the rich dont want to invest in retrofitting for light crude.
      because they want to maximize profits

  • @danasharpe3247
    @danasharpe3247 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    This video is a low-information voter killer! I sold Oil and Gas LP's as a young man with a Series 22. I later received a Series 63 and finally my Series 7. I studied the Industry for years. This is probably the best explanation of the Oil and Gas Industry I have ever seen. Kudos.

    • @middleoftheroad1
      @middleoftheroad1 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I also thought it was very thorough but it appears to have greatly confused many people from all these ridiculous comments posted.

    • @tedlewis309
      @tedlewis309 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I'll bet you got the jab to .😅😂

    • @jameseverett9037
      @jameseverett9037 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tedlewis309 they got all the boosters, AND a free bridge of their own.

  • @PhillipChris-rd1ow
    @PhillipChris-rd1ow 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Just proof our politicians are not in charge .

    • @pepsiflyboy8831
      @pepsiflyboy8831 หลายเดือนก่อน

      money money

    • @RomoRooster
      @RomoRooster หลายเดือนก่อน

      The politicians are in collusion with big oil

  • @KevinsHomeAloneAgain
    @KevinsHomeAloneAgain 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +177

    They have been saying the same excuse for 40 years, it costs to much and yet the oil companies rake in 100 billion in profit per year. The reason we do not switch the refineries is the same reason we are not using other types of fuels to run cars. The oil companies will not allow their monopoly to be challenged.

    • @billythatkidd6926
      @billythatkidd6926 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Yet the money we sent to Ukraine alone could've built enough refineries to keep 🇺🇸 self relient. But Democratic politics 🤨

    • @carlsanders7824
      @carlsanders7824 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That makes no sense. If we processed the oil we used here, then the US oil companies would have an even bigger stranglehold on our energy needs.

    • @toomanymarys7355
      @toomanymarys7355 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No one is stopping anyone from buying an electric car.

    • @johndoe-ss9bz
      @johndoe-ss9bz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@carlsanders7824 : The Oil Companies are Corporations, and the SCOTUS reasoned Corporations are People Too.

    • @williamallen7836
      @williamallen7836 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The EPA has a huge part to play. They refuse to approve refinery upgrades, and building of new refineries. This is even worse in CA ware CARB & the CA EPA get in the way.

  • @michaelmaas5544
    @michaelmaas5544 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +336

    Companies aren’t pulling out of oil refining and production, our government is forcing them out.

    • @track1949
      @track1949 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Yes! Case in point what was the largest refinery on the east in Phila.closed some time ago.

    • @erniestoner8266
      @erniestoner8266 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Our government has done this with the liberals help. BIDEN shut down most of all the new oil finds the second day he was in office. Time we start using our own oil reserves and make it more safe. Upgrade and build new refineries. BUILD THE PIPELINE. 😅

    • @SamSitar
      @SamSitar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@track1949 break the lockout by reopen that refinery.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      YEAH delta use to own a oil refinery . i been told by some people who worked at Delta air lines the fed gov was very mean and nasty to Delta and the rules were changing every week

    • @baneverything5580
      @baneverything5580 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "Green $$$$" energy.

  • @Dr.Know_4U
    @Dr.Know_4U 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +222

    This seems more like obfuscation than an attempt to explain things.

    • @renzo7503
      @renzo7503 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      EXACTLY!!!

    • @sabin97
      @sabin97 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      what did you find obfuscating about it?
      what he was describing is known as corporate greed.
      the capitalists controlling your oil industry dont want to invest in the infrastructure needed to bring prices down for your benefit. because they want to maximize profits.

    • @jtjones4081
      @jtjones4081 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      If Congress would reimplement the 40 year long ban on exporting US produced crude there would be 3-4 million barrels per day of pipelines capacity freed up. That’s the equivalent of 5 Keystone XL pipelines.

    • @WylieWiggins
      @WylieWiggins 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Evading any mention of the corporate mind set of run it as long as it profits without investment of any kind fits suit! Heavy crude carries more byproducts, yet we've recently closed capable refineries, supply and demand set into action! A controlled regulator system is not a regulator. At present production numbers, a few days to a month's profits would pay for modernizing the mentioned refineries, but that would cant the economic flow to the elites pockets and demand more investment they do not like making.

    • @totallycv2388
      @totallycv2388 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Likely deep state got to this channel, like so many others.

  • @rcsontag
    @rcsontag 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Government interference will kill any industry. In this case, look no further than the EPA to wonder why we don't modernize and improve our refineries.

  • @DeanEPolumboJr
    @DeanEPolumboJr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I've never heard so much bull in my entire life. XD 10 out of 10 DO NOT RECOMMEND!

  • @gladyscommons5559
    @gladyscommons5559 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    USA is a huge country with plenty of land to do any process we need.

    • @GntlTch
      @GntlTch หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Takes a lot more than just land. It takes fertile land and water - lots of water - to name just a couple.

    • @speedbuggy5573
      @speedbuggy5573 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@GntlTch And For The Government To Get Out Of The Way With so many asinine counterproductive rules and regulations...

    • @fredrickwheeler6852
      @fredrickwheeler6852 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Such a convenient answer... but everything in the U.S. is a business. They'd have to buy that land, they'd have to build a refinery, they'd have to hire workers, deal with regulations, etc. If it was profitable, someone would be doing it. They aren't because it isn't. Big oil makes more money with the infrastructure they have, than investing in more. And even if someone else had the money to invest, trusted the investment to be stable, and actually made an effort to put it into action, they'd still have to deal with activists, protests and, oh right, the big oil companies that don't want competition.

    • @middleoftheroad1
      @middleoftheroad1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What part of it will cost hundreds of billions of dollars for these private companies to convert the refineries is so hard to understand? They do like to make money......

    • @jameseverett9037
      @jameseverett9037 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is a propaganda video. Be carefull...the BS smell from it might leak into the next video.

  • @Glostahdude
    @Glostahdude 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    US oil is of a higher grade. Bottom line? It’s worth more selling it outright, and buying cheaper lower grade oil.

    • @raymondhoffman4371
      @raymondhoffman4371 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Than why is gas so high

    • @agent7118
      @agent7118 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@raymondhoffman4371
      Seriously? 😅 The US government has been taken over by anti American communists that are ripping us all off. You haven't been paying attention have you? There's been a revolution happening for the last 8 years. Wake up! 🇺🇲

    • @agent7118
      @agent7118 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@raymondhoffman4371
      A simple way to explain it. Biden/Harris

    • @JohnnyArtPavlou
      @JohnnyArtPavlou หลายเดือนก่อน

      So all of that oil, of course, is a one time commodity. I never hear anyone talk about the economics of oil leases. Because the oil that is under federal lands is our common inheritance. The rest of the stuff I don’t know… Maybe it should be nationalized😂😂😂

    • @JohnnyArtPavlou
      @JohnnyArtPavlou หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@agent7118 I personally know that Kamala Harris gets a dime in her purse every time you pump gallon of gas. It’s true.

  • @stevegabbert9626
    @stevegabbert9626 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    After reading the comments below, I'm not going to depend on ANY of them as fact. I recommend no one else should either.

  • @larrygooch6233
    @larrygooch6233 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    They are feeding us the light oil and calling it often seed oil,😂

  • @johnwakefield9378
    @johnwakefield9378 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Build a refinery? Imagine trying to get a permit to do that.

  • @RDC_Autosports
    @RDC_Autosports 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    i use to work for chevron pascagoula mississippi. most places were already updated to extract it from anything, it’s not cheaper to import oil for the consumer just the importer that why prices are the way they are, when we pump/extract our own it’s cheaper cause we don’t get the import fees, that gets passed onto us. they just ran the XL pipe line wide open to restock our reserves cause it’s cheaper to do that then stock it with foreign oil

    • @Flash3-22
      @Flash3-22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The shutdown of the pipeline was multifactoral.
      Cost for completion, impact on water sources, and
      history of catastrophic spills.

    • @RDC_Autosports
      @RDC_Autosports 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Flash3-22 guess you didn’t read the whole statement lmao😂 “the pipeline is wide open to restock our reserves “ that’s why fuel is cheap at the moment 🤦‍♂️

    • @tooterooterville
      @tooterooterville 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Flash3-22 Do you know how many miles of underground petroleum pipelines criss-cross this country? Some of which are multiple times more dangerous to human life than the XL, much less than to the water resources.

  • @jeffnpatricia
    @jeffnpatricia 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    If America wanted to dominate this business it would. They chose not to. Bet.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      wrong Fed Gov is in way

    • @jeffnpatricia
      @jeffnpatricia 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@dknowles60 correct. They are who would need to “ want to “.

    • @sabin97
      @sabin97 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      it's called corporate greed.
      why would the rich invest money to charge you less?
      that's not a rhetorical question.

    • @JohnGrandline
      @JohnGrandline 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@sabin97 indeed if america used its own oil a lot more then gasoline etc. prices would fall from heaven to earth therefore not making as much greedy profit

    • @12567NoYouCannot
      @12567NoYouCannot 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @JEFFNPRATICIA: Very Well Said!!!

  • @WickeD72
    @WickeD72 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    I think banning drilling has more to do with saving domestic oils reserve's in favor of depleting foreign reserve's. Its easier to sell this strategy as environmental protection and its a way of getting votes.

    • @anotherguy9402
      @anotherguy9402 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That's always how i saw it

    • @KathrynAthena
      @KathrynAthena 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also the elites plan to push us into 15 minute cities and create huge "buffer zones". Essentially preserving the US oil reserves for their own use while they dribble it to cities at maximum profit and total energy control.

    • @chornii_boumer7324
      @chornii_boumer7324 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very interesting.

    • @dellaw1633
      @dellaw1633 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Biden emptied our oil reserves, and cancelled our pipelines

    • @inquisitvem6723
      @inquisitvem6723 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep. Problem it will take decades for oil to be depleted in foreign countries like Saudi Arabia or even longer. Definitely past your lifetime. Politicians just want your vote

  • @henrymarshall525
    @henrymarshall525 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    All about Money 💵, for the love of it is leading to Destruction !

  • @kellyarnett4062
    @kellyarnett4062 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    If we stopped supporting world economy and worry about economy, America would do better. Cheaper also.

    • @speedbuggy5573
      @speedbuggy5573 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And President Trump Poved That Was Possible: Then Came Joe N Kamala...

    • @OriginalReact
      @OriginalReact 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@speedbuggy5573 Did he? Is that why he increased the National Debt by $7.8 Trillion in 4 years (Thats a lot)

    • @speedbuggy5573
      @speedbuggy5573 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @OriginalReact You wouldn't mind posting proof of that would you...
      The national debt has grown by over $7.29 trillion since Biden took office in 2021.

    • @speedbuggy5573
      @speedbuggy5573 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @OriginalReact That's A Very Close Race IF Put In The Proper Perspective
      All I know is my overall cost of living Is A LOT Higher Today Than In President Trumps First Term...

    • @OriginalReact
      @OriginalReact 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@speedbuggy5573 If he gets in again and starts pushing these tariffs he keeps talking about. It will get even more expensive

  • @mike9119
    @mike9119 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    all boils down to GREED.

    • @redfields5070
      @redfields5070 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, your greed to ride in your car to get to all the things you want to do.

    • @12567NoYouCannot
      @12567NoYouCannot 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@redfields5070 What? You don't have to Get Groceries, Go to Work, or get a medical Check-up If you Can Live like that; Good for You!! Because MILLIONS of AMERICANS HAVE TO GO OUT and GET A LIFE!!!

    • @12567NoYouCannot
      @12567NoYouCannot 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@redfields5070 Then Build with YOUR OWN MONEY a Massive & Efficient TRANSIT SYSTEM that the AMERICAN PEOPLE CAN USE Daily to go to WORK, BUY FOOD, GO to the Doctor and take their Children to SCHOOL. Instead of Criticizing People for Doing what they HAVE TO DO DAILY for LIVING.

    • @redfields5070
      @redfields5070 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@12567NoYouCannot
      I think you misunderstand my comment. I'm saying people have to get from home to their job and back again. Mass transit couldn't possibly replace cars in my city. It is way too far to walk from any mass transit hub to where we work. We do not live in vertical spaces so that all buildings are within walking distance. It's easily 5-10 miles from every termination point.

    • @freewill1114
      @freewill1114 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mostly, people who do not understand free enterprise and capitalism say things like that. They think profits are evil.

  • @jonomasonILoveU
    @jonomasonILoveU 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

    Lies lies and more lies, how dumb do you think we are ??.

    • @jeremynewman1277
      @jeremynewman1277 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree with you all lies and it's Joe Biden's fault trickle down economics one day in office any signs the document shutting the pipeline down that's when the oil companies lost a ton of money and put a lot of people out of work and made everything more expensive

    • @BryanW-bp3le
      @BryanW-bp3le 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      You have anything to refute anything said in this video?

    • @LG-tw5vm
      @LG-tw5vm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​@@BryanW-bp3leWe had ZERO problems using our own oil during the Trump administration.

    • @tourdelance3698
      @tourdelance3698 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      There’s no such thing as fossil fuel Fossils have only been found as low as 16,000 feet. We drill for oil between 26,000 and 32,000 feet deep! We need to drop the words “fossil fuel” ⛽️ they keep telling us we have 10,000 new oil drilling leases, but a lease is worthless without a permit. We have ZERO PERMITS from this administration!! 🤷🏼‍♂️ We need to pass the bill HR1 to open up drilling & fracking oil! PERMITS!!! bill

    • @johnchamberlain5435
      @johnchamberlain5435 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      If building refineries is so prohibitively expensive, how did we come to have the ones we already have?

  • @robertsmith6126
    @robertsmith6126 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Very interesting program! Our government and greed shot us in the foot!!

  • @JamesNeubauer-z3v
    @JamesNeubauer-z3v 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    All B.Schitt ! USA hasn't built a refineries for over 50 years. The oil industry makes record profits and needs to start caring about USA and make a little. Less profit from greedy Corporations.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 หลายเดือนก่อน

      nice lie

  • @zz449944
    @zz449944 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I recall a scientific write-up from the 1980's in the Exxon trade magazine "THE LAMP" that showed a visual comparison of the MANY TYPES of CRUDE OIL in the world -- from what I remember, there were roughly 12 or more distinct types. Each type of crude had different properties of chemical (molecular) contents, different levels of hydrocarbons, different contaminants, and different viscosity.
    Being that the United States has not built any new oil refineries since 1979, pretty much all of the existing refineries rely on OLD Technology to do the actual refining and all other processes. It is then easy to realize that not ALL types of crude oil can be efficiently utilized by US refineries -- some types of crude are just not the right types. So there are many situations where it is more profitable to transport and Sell oil from the USA to other places in the world that can use it and then turn around and BUY more appropriate types of crude oil from yet other places around the world. So, yes, we do buy and sell crude oil and other petrol products amongst our allies AND our enemies. It is beneficial to us and to them, even if we hate each other at the same time.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that was 1976

  • @etssmith2107
    @etssmith2107 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +94

    There is no green energy

    • @dublkrossr2059
      @dublkrossr2059 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Except for grass fed meat lol I'm energetic af when I'm BBQ'n a fat steak

    • @sabin97
      @sabin97 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      that depends on what you mean by "green energy".
      the total pollution for the electricity generated by a a solar panel during its lifetime is orders of magnitude lower than the pollution of generating that same amount of electricity with fossil fuels.
      when most people say "green energy" they dont mean "absolutely zero pollution". they mean a significant reduction in pollution. and that's a very good thing.

    • @dublkrossr2059
      @dublkrossr2059 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@sabin97 True but EV, Solar, Wind turbines are all far from the "green" aspect as is being reported to the public. Have you watched "The Great Global Warming Swindle" documentary? Just more good information for the brain to ponder.

    • @sabin97
      @sabin97 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@dublkrossr2059
      if by "green" you mean absolutely zero pollution then of course NOTHING humans do is "green".
      if you mean significantly less pollution then they are green.
      also global warming is real. i've noticed the effects FOR YEARS......buildings that were relatively close to the ocean, are now almost IN the ocean. i have lost a lot of cays, also because of a rising ocean level. some of my crops (hardy, heat-resistant crops) have died because of the more intense heat in the summer. summer temperatures have extended far into october.
      it's not a "swindle" it's reality. i dont need some anglo telling me "listen to me, dont believe your lying eyes".

    • @jtjones4081
      @jtjones4081 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Crude oil is going to become more expensive each year. There’s nothing that can be done about that. We need ALL forms of energy ASAP if you want your grandkids to have a secure energy future. Any Alaskan oil produced would be exported.

  • @MisterHolaMan
    @MisterHolaMan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    In short, it’s all a scam 😒

    • @BVonBuescher
      @BVonBuescher 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just because you don’t understand macroeconomics, doesn’t mean it’s a scam, it means you need to reassess your education and probably voting habits

    • @MisterHolaMan
      @MisterHolaMan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BVonBuescher you dweeb. so they say our infrastructure doesnt have the right technology to process it, and that they'd rather sell it to someone else than pay to upgrade our technology, because we will magically happen to stop using oil sometime later? sounds like a scam to me

    • @MisterHolaMan
      @MisterHolaMan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BVonBuescher for the record I took industrial chem courses in college so Im probably more educated than you on the topic, fool 😡 sit down

    • @MisterHolaMan
      @MisterHolaMan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BVonBuescher I went to college for chemistry, what was that about reassessing my education? 😡

    • @MisterHolaMan
      @MisterHolaMan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BVonBuescher so they'd rather skimp costs by using outdated tech using the feeble and false notion that we will be going oil free soon anyway? and I'm the one who dlesnt understand? lol go away

  • @ssaraccoii
    @ssaraccoii 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Like the great Alaskan pipeline Jimmy Carter touted. Alaskan crude is sour (heavy in sulfur). The only refineries capable of handling it are in Japan, so almost all of it went to Japan. As for US refining, it would be west coast, California, and nobody wants to put up with California’s Khafkaesqe regulatory atmosphere, so why try to process sour or heavy crude there. It can be done, but California makes it financially infeasable.

    • @warrendragon74
      @warrendragon74 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What do you think the Keystone pipeline was for? To move that oil east of the Rockies to refineries that could handle the "heavy oil". Leaving Cali n Japan empty handed putting the money made into OUR HANDS not theirs. Its not just estates and properties that Don knows a LOT about , it takes big business to handle big business. People that has been in politics for decades , left or right just know how to lie and steal.

    • @12567NoYouCannot
      @12567NoYouCannot 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is the Same US Government that is Constantly telling Parents how to Raise their Children that Should be Putting Up Refineries in at least Five Other States. Plus, that will Not just Help the Price of Gas at the Pump, but it will help the Economy by Giving Our American People JOBS.

    • @tajon5394
      @tajon5394 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not true, very little goes to Japan. Washington and California gets the majority of it, even Hawaii. Even Alaska has refineries that use it. H2S is the main cause of oil being sour.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 หลายเดือนก่อน

      nice lie some of that oil use to come to the Us

  • @Someguy055
    @Someguy055 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Incompetant leadership. US was energy independent 4 years ago.

    • @OriginalReact
      @OriginalReact 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No we weren't. Even now we are importing less crude oil than we were during the height of Trumps administration (2018).

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 หลายเดือนก่อน

      YEHA, I guess You Tube for Got about the 1973 Spanking that OPEC gave the Us be for most people on You Tube were born

  • @stevekrag1610
    @stevekrag1610 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Drill baby drill. Refine baby refine.

  • @garybrown9719
    @garybrown9719 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    US alaska oil is the best European countries pay dearly for itfor it 😮

  • @jtjones4081
    @jtjones4081 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    “The US makes more money by exporting our oil and importing replacement oil.” ??? The private companies make more money, crude production isn’t a government enterprise. Duh.

    • @Fishy-i2g
      @Fishy-i2g 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      And the government gets all the import taxes and taxes on the oil sold. So YES, the Government does increase profits by importation of oil.

  • @hick775
    @hick775 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Notice how the gas prices drop during an election year. I'm sure its just a coincidence.

    • @gobbler1957
      @gobbler1957 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's a fact.

  • @ronald4700
    @ronald4700 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They will pump it if the price is right.

  • @jimhahn2728
    @jimhahn2728 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In the Gulf Of Mexico, they are drilling and sending oil directly to the refineries in Texas and Louisiana. Shale oil form Fracking isd almost useless. Gulf oil, while not as high a quality as Saudi Arabia but it is good oil and is used. We don't import oil since 2008. This article is BS.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 หลายเดือนก่อน

      YEAh

  • @terryriedel1534
    @terryriedel1534 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    So your saying spending blood in wars is cheaper I call BS

    • @mattk8810
      @mattk8810 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It is. They buy cheap and sell high

  • @zappothesaneOne
    @zappothesaneOne 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    This video should be required viewing for anyone who actually believes that the president can control/influence gasoline prices in any meaningful way.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      then why is the Price of gasoline coming Down, Hint Harris needs help

    • @1pcfred
      @1pcfred 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The 6th executive order Joe Biden issued was cancelling the Keystone pipeline. It was done in the first hours he took office. He also froze oil leases too. Now what were you saying about American presidents and their influence on gasoline prices?

    • @donnastokes-manning6175
      @donnastokes-manning6175 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Oh, you mean you are falling for this? 😂🤣😅😂

    • @Flash3-22
      @Flash3-22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@dknowles60 Supply and demand. Summer is over.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Flash3-22 wrong again

  • @frequentlycynical642
    @frequentlycynical642 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I've often wondered about all this. Left unexamined is how the nations that buy our oil use it. Their light oil refineries, etc.

    • @ВиталийМаксимов-д1ъ
      @ВиталийМаксимов-д1ъ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Light oil = more gasolin. They mix it with ther oil. And have a lot of gasolin on top of necessary petroleun refinery product which are presented only in heavy oil. This is why green energy total scam, we can replace gasolin, but oil gives to humanity much more.

  • @DS-nk7jr
    @DS-nk7jr 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    just like the diamonds, its about supply and demand profits. They keep saying it's about the refinery nothing to do with refining it everything to do with keeping the price where the big corporations wanted and keeping people dependent on it.

  • @pokerdev218
    @pokerdev218 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Should specific humans be allowed to 'own' and 'profit from' natural resources solely?

  • @r.j.martin1818
    @r.j.martin1818 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    From a strategic point of view, it is smarter to use everyone else's oil and gas and let them run out of it before using ours at a greatly inflated price. That thinking works if we never fully utilize atomic energy.

    • @sendthis9480
      @sendthis9480 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Have you seen one of those skits where two people, right next to each other, are selling the same exact thing.
      They each keep lowering their prices, causing the other one to lower his price as well.
      Finally…the prices have been driven down so low that one guy buys out all of the other guy’s products.
      Then he can sell the product for whatever price he wants with no competition.
      It seems like the same thing here.

    • @inquisitvem6723
      @inquisitvem6723 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If we had listened to Al Gore back in 2000, we would have a bunch of nuclear plants like Europe specifically Germany…clean asf

    • @capnbilll2913
      @capnbilll2913 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      By the time the world runs out of oil, the Middle East will own every single square foot of the USA. There are several hundred years of current known reserves. Probably closer to 1,000 years if we develop every known deposit.

  • @GrimGames1978
    @GrimGames1978 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    our country can refine and use our own oil. but our government is way too busy being corrupt and trying to cover up their own lies. if we kept our own oil and stopped buying others , we would be energy independent , and several other countries would collapse due to us not buying theirs.

    • @dlengelkes
      @dlengelkes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If that is true @grimgames1978 then why did Trump not reinstated the oil export ban that was placed by Ford which was repealed by the Obama administration?

    • @jtjones4081
      @jtjones4081 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not true, but it would help. We’d still have to import crude even if we kept the 3-4 million barrels of crude we export each day but we’d need to import less and have lower prices at the pump. You can thank the GOP for voting to lift the 40 year long ban on exporting our crude oil in 2015 at the behest of frackers.

    • @ricosauve5
      @ricosauve5 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We couldn't just use our own oil without prices skyrocketing. Because we in the US dont control the price of oil per barrel. That's another thing our government signed over to the overseas oil producers. So without undoing that, which the politicians wont Because they're in big oil pockets, it would lead to huge price increases for not selling our oil overseas

    • @rgarito
      @rgarito 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Our government isn't buying (most of) the oil. Oil companies are. You do not fill your gas tank up with US Government brand Gasoline.

    • @inquisitvem6723
      @inquisitvem6723 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Too costly to use our own oil. Didn’t you watch the entire vid?

  • @twosencefromcleveland6084
    @twosencefromcleveland6084 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    That's some real good sounding B'S.
    There's enough oil on a tank ship to last the country about 15 minutes. You forgot to say how much a tanker costs; and yes, they get replaced eventually. So, 2 - 3 tankers builds 1 refinery, but all the needed refineries exist...there are idle right now - oh, you forgot to mention this too?
    You said all this without saying, the oil companies make more profit from importing foreign oil, and exporting OURS! GREED is the reason...the only reason. That would have shortened your video, and not wasted my time though.

    • @spencerharward4884
      @spencerharward4884 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      NO. Greed is not the reason. THE GOVERNMENT IS THE REASON PRICES ARE TOO HIGH.

    • @SirCraig-yp6ds
      @SirCraig-yp6ds 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's a global market?

    • @fredrickwheeler6852
      @fredrickwheeler6852 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're missing how economics works. Firstly, the oil companies don't own the tankers, or if they do they own them in the form of a subsidiary or contractor that owns the tankers. Secondly the tankers pay for themselves by performing their job: transporting the oil. The refineries are not paid for by the tankers, they're paid for by the oil that they refine. Even if they built a refinery they'd have to buy the oil from whoever unearthed it, or they'd have to unearth it and transport it themselves. If they're already unearthing it, then they're already selling it, which is already making them profits. They'd either have to lose customers and thus revenue by diverting product, or they'd have to invest in more drilling to obtain more oil just to supply the refineries that they built. Even if all of this was actually profitable, they'd want to increase their prices in order to offset the costs of the refineries, labor, transportation infrastructure etc. Which means either prices go up for the consumer, or they're too expensive to sell product. Which makes the whole venture a waste of time.
      The rich want easy profits, not risky ventures. Risky ventures are done by ambitious upstarts who aren't rich yet. And those people can't afford to fund a project like this. So unless you want the government to own and run the refineries, it's not likely to happen.

    • @fredrickwheeler6852
      @fredrickwheeler6852 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@spencerharward4884 a convenient answer for anyone who wants someone to blame without caring to understand how the world works. Very convenient.

  • @wandawalkertruth
    @wandawalkertruth 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Thank you so much. I wanted to understand this and know why gas prices are so high

  • @bvw3153
    @bvw3153 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Also, unlike many other countries, we don't have a nationalized oil and gas industry. So what is produced here doesn't belong to us; it belongs to the oil and gas companies.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Like the Fed Gov would do the Job any better, Just go back to 1`918 when the Fed Gov ran the Rail roads, it was a big failure

  • @christophermonley8809
    @christophermonley8809 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Makes perfect sense.
    The transition to clean energy is the way to go.
    If only windmill noise didn't cause cancer. And wind turbines weren't a graveyard for birds the numbers of which nobody has ever seen before in the history of our nation, maybe in the history of the world. And wind energy worked on calm days since we can't watch TV until the wind kicks up. And magnets worked when they get wet. And solar energy wasn't useless on cloudy days. ("Bust out the candles, Mable, it's raining.")

    • @bonniechase5599
      @bonniechase5599 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And if solar panels didn't break in hailstorms.

    • @eq1373
      @eq1373 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There's no such thing as "clean energy." If there was, it would have caught on decades ago.

  • @Bob-cd5pp
    @Bob-cd5pp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    Let's just face our system is Broken

    • @carlsanders7824
      @carlsanders7824 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The system works fine. The incentives are what drive actions.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      no Fed Gov in the Way

    • @joe-d9c
      @joe-d9c 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@carlsanders7824 No it's rigged dummy!

    • @Flash3-22
      @Flash3-22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only because a certain candidate is telling you that story.

  • @SenorBigmac
    @SenorBigmac 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The first video I have. Hard time believing.someone please explain why the prices were so low back then.... compared to now?

    • @Musicdudeyoutub
      @Musicdudeyoutub 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Lots of reasons.. war and the threat of war, global inflation, geopolitical tensions, greed

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Harris is trying to win the POUTS

    • @omirlino
      @omirlino 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The oil market is worldwide, not just in the US. So if we produce more that has the effect of putting downward pressure on the overall oil prices causing prices to be lower. Over simplified, yes but it is a supply/demand mandate thing. More supply=lower prices, long as one or a small groups of companies isn’t able to monopolize a market it like Debeers has done with diamonds. Plus you can add groups trying everything they could to prevent any new refineries and can drastically increase the cost of building new refineries

    • @jtjones4081
      @jtjones4081 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @Senor, the Saudis were waging a price war against Russia and US frackers, fearing loss of market share. They produce a barrel of crude for less than either. It worked in part as 600 oil and gas companies went bankrupt between 2015-2021 walking away from $321 billion in debt. Source; Haynes Boone Bankruptcy Monitor. You can easily find that. Bankruptcies continued all through the Trump admin.
      Now that they’ve washed that $321 billion in sunk costs, the Big 4 stepped in and bought up those assets for cheap. The Big 4 are now netting record profits each quarter.

    • @rgarito
      @rgarito 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      OPEC. Oil prices are decided on a market very similar to the stock market. OPEC reduces production to reduce supply. This drives up the price for everyone. High oil prices=good for OPEC. Low oil prices=bad for OPEC. Like most things "economy" what is good for the rich is usually bad for the middle class consumer.

  • @Red-sm1cl
    @Red-sm1cl หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your missing a key point. The reason it takes so long and is so expensive to setup rigs and modernize refineries is because of government red tape. It deosn't take long to drill and build a pump (month or two) but our government has made the process so burdensome that it takes two years. The cost is also overinflated for the same reason. Another example of this is the public restroom debaucle in San Fran (look it up for a laugh). Or his the post office runs so much worse than private shipping companies.
    Beaurocrats need money too ;)

  • @realtundratrash
    @realtundratrash 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I live in north dakota and work in the oil field. He's exactly right about our refineries being too expensive to overhaul for light crude.
    In the 20s the wild swinging grain prices were horrible for ND farmers, so we built a state flour mill to help stabilize prices. I worked there for 3 years. It's the largest flour mill in the western hemisphere, and even though it's government run, it's very profitable.
    I've been proposing for years that ND should do the same thing for oil. Use the enormous surplus in the oil legacy fund, and build a state refinery. It will stabilize oil prices, provide great jobs, and help America reduce oil imports

  • @hiddentruth1982
    @hiddentruth1982 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    It boils down to the epa regulations and state regulations make it impossible to build new refineries because of all the cost in fees. The refineries will never make their money back from new refineries.

    • @Nyet-Zdyes
      @Nyet-Zdyes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Imagine getting permits to build a refinery... so you invest billions of dollars to build one, and start construction.
      A couple of years later, some politician REVOKES your permit.

    • @carlsanders7824
      @carlsanders7824 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agreed. The video left out that important part of the equation.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Nyet-Zdyes YEA

    • @markvalery8632
      @markvalery8632 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why did the same era and states allow all these new LNG facilities to be built?

    • @hiddentruth1982
      @hiddentruth1982 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@markvalery8632 They were built before all the regulations were put in place by the epa. That's why they keep upgrading and repairing them. It's actually cheaper to over haul a whole factory than it is to try to build a new more efficient one. As for the states. They bring on revenue and tax money. Not to mention they are located in places that it's easier to ship from via water ways.

  • @michaelbarnes7351
    @michaelbarnes7351 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    No one is going to spend that kind of money, Ukraine would like to make a statement.

    • @charlesanderson9277
      @charlesanderson9277 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      UKRAINE : HOLD MY VODKA , WATCH THIS !

    • @rodica69
      @rodica69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The whole world knows that Ukraine war as it is: UK and USA against Russia. Germany and EU in the middle as the public scapegoats. That's the way it is since the 2nd WW.

  • @GregariousAntithesis
    @GregariousAntithesis 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    "Nothing good" for for refining our own and using our own oil except no more wars for oil.

    • @Flash3-22
      @Flash3-22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We are refining most of our own oil.

    • @GregariousAntithesis
      @GregariousAntithesis 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Flash3-22 false our refineries are designed for heavy crude and we have light crude. So we import heavy crude to refine and sell our light crude to be refined over seas

  • @danielworden4695
    @danielworden4695 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sound like they need to get an act of Congress done so I could go down to my local gas station .

  • @1pcmedic
    @1pcmedic 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    No matter what, we must become oil independent.

  • @KrisPcracker
    @KrisPcracker 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Next video is going to start off saying in 2023 we had the lowest border crossing in history 🤦‍♀️

  • @IricAlexis
    @IricAlexis 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    TLDR they export the oil for some people to take profit of it, and then they import oil for people to pay for it

  • @robertadams2857
    @robertadams2857 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Ive always thought: Use others oil first saving ours for later..... infrastructure considered.

    • @carlsanders7824
      @carlsanders7824 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It is all sold. Nothing is saved. You do not make money storing oil in the long run.

    • @robertadams2857
      @robertadams2857 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@carlsanders7824 true.

    • @warrendragon74
      @warrendragon74 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      "Use others oil first saving ours for later." What are you .... selfish , greedy or all of the above. "Infrastructure considered" sounds like a sugar coated bullshit excuse to cover such selfish ignorance.

    • @robertadams2857
      @robertadams2857 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@warrendragon74 lol. Lighten up Francis

    • @warrendragon74
      @warrendragon74 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robertadams2857 Whats wrong , Karen. Dont like to be called out. Boohoo lol.

  • @danrowlands3705
    @danrowlands3705 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    $200b to be self sufficient...
    They've sent more money to Ukraine

    • @nem447
      @nem447 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Duh! The majority of that money never leaves the USA economy...

  • @jrtstrategicapital560
    @jrtstrategicapital560 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Southern California was founded on oil....you can see pumps and wells everywhere . The GOVT however shut down the fields decades ago as Strategic Reserves..

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 หลายเดือนก่อน

      nice lie they were Sold to Al gore

  • @artboymoy
    @artboymoy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This is a very good video explaining the reasons why the oil situation is the way it is.

  • @goingtoparis9404
    @goingtoparis9404 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Very well done. Should be required viewing for every American.

    • @rgarito
      @rgarito 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sadly, if you read the comments here, you will find that even if they are required to view it, many STILL will downright refuse to understand.

  • @markclark4154
    @markclark4154 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    American oil is not suitable for Diesel production. The hydrocarbon chains are too short.

    • @dlengelkes
      @dlengelkes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How about Gasoline?

    • @Miner-49
      @Miner-49 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Diesel moves the world and economies, gas just moves ass.

    • @dlengelkes
      @dlengelkes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Miner-49 gasoline is what fuels our cars. So can American Oil be uses to be gasoline.

    • @nocapproductions5471
      @nocapproductions5471 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@dlengelkesAmerican oil is lighter and is perfect for gasoline. As for why they dont want to refine it? Well the private companies dont want to invest Billions in it. Solution is US Gov should put a mandate that they Have to refine it. Because US would earn more if they did refine it instead of just shipped it crude

    • @rgarito
      @rgarito 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@nocapproductions5471 ... and your gas prices would go up. Did you miss the part about how much it would cost to convert our refineries to process US light oil? Who do you think pays for it?

  • @mikesamolsky4719
    @mikesamolsky4719 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    who drew the map showing the wells. Missed a lot in texas

  • @Ronbflorida
    @Ronbflorida หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love reading all the comments from people who don't have the mental capacity to comprehend the facts here. This explains why the election went the way it did.

    • @Fishy-i2g
      @Fishy-i2g 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      No, it went the way it did because the other option was a cackling hyena that was in charge of the borders allowing millions of criminals into the country unchecked.

  • @imlostagainWTF
    @imlostagainWTF 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The question starts to be answered at 6:51

  • @JoshL1976
    @JoshL1976 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Jones Act needs to go in the trash

  • @harescuts2931
    @harescuts2931 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    No! Your 100% wrong . The oil Infrastructure would benefit all Americans on every front. From taking it out of the ground to refining, and distribution. All the money spent in the country would stay in the country because AMERICAN CITIZENS WILL BE WORKING IN ALL OF THESE AREAS OF PRODUCTION, KEEPING PROSPERITY IN THE US ECONOMY. WHAT EVER IS LEFT OVER WOULD BE SOLD FOR EXPORT PROFIT.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 หลายเดือนก่อน

      tell that to the Dems and your fed gov

    • @dylankrepps2169
      @dylankrepps2169 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dknowles60 You mean democratic inserted fed gov.

  • @nickernator4788
    @nickernator4788 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Cost" doesn't include moral or environmental effects outside the US apparently.
    Sounds like we should've invested in oil infrastructure, specifically pipelines, instead of Ukraine and all the others.

  • @josephrys6536
    @josephrys6536 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very informative, helps with understanding the situation.

  • @FarmTastic97
    @FarmTastic97 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The US produces oil but cannot utilize it effectively, which is a complicated problem. Despite abundant resources, factors such as infrastructure, demand and law make it difficult for US crude oil to serve domestically. So what will the future be like?

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      how young are you , Last big brand new oil Refinery built came on line in 1977, fed gov EPA in the Way

    • @Kitajima2
      @Kitajima2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nuclear energy

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Kitajima2 very costly

    • @Kitajima2
      @Kitajima2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dknowles60 It's the cheapest form of energy after the initial investment. And the initial investment would be a fraction of the trillions we waste on the military industrial complex

    • @FarmTastic97
      @FarmTastic97 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Kitajima2 Nuclear energy is gradually replaced

  • @carnerageno
    @carnerageno 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Venezuela imports their own oil, has their own refineries and gas stations in America, Saudi Arabia does the same thing. American media doesn't talk about this.

  • @tonywright4361
    @tonywright4361 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    regulators put in unreasonable regulations on refining and will not allow any new refineries to utilize the oil. It can be refined and manipulated like crazy adn NO oil products is wasted. This ius the fault of environmentalist's with BUllcrap reasons - the tech is available to do wonders with this products

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      YEA

    • @markvalery8632
      @markvalery8632 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "will not allow any new refineries to utilize the oil": Can you give me an exact example to back up what you say?

    • @OriginalReact
      @OriginalReact 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@markvalery8632 Our savior Lord Trump said so. What more proof do you need?

  • @danaeverhart6487
    @danaeverhart6487 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Elon’s new no waste in government spending committee will get to the bottom of this matter!!! It can’t happen soon enough!!!

  • @erickanter
    @erickanter 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    American oil is light sweet crude. Refineries are set to refine heavy crude.

  • @Michael-e4n8v
    @Michael-e4n8v 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Follow the money

  • @hiddentruth1982
    @hiddentruth1982 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    yet we are importing oil each day. While in 2019 we were exporting oil and not importing it.

    • @carlsanders7824
      @carlsanders7824 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      No. We have never stopped importing oil.

    • @chuckmiller5763
      @chuckmiller5763 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Correct, and barrels of oil were almost free for a little while. DRILL BABY DRILL.

    • @gpsfinancial6988
      @gpsfinancial6988 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chuckmiller5763 USA is drilling more oil than it ever has. There are many more rigs now than there were under Trump - no surprise, the economy was so bad under Trump that oil futures dropped below zero for the first time in history.

    • @strawdemindset
      @strawdemindset 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wrong the us has never stopped importing oil. We import and export constantly, as a matter of fact were exporting more than were importing NOW

    • @DougZeller-l7d
      @DougZeller-l7d 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      WRONG, all you have to do is ask Google how much oil we import by the year from Saudi Arabia. I'm MAGA all the way but this post is embarrassing.

  • @kellyarnett4062
    @kellyarnett4062 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    America was energy independent under Trump. Let's do it again.

    • @richiereverb
      @richiereverb หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolute lie , like everything Chump says !

    • @jefferysill5539
      @jefferysill5539 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Production is higher now than under 45

  • @jack_dparrow
    @jack_dparrow หลายเดือนก่อน

    Trump is going full “ drill baby drill” 😂

  • @ekankle
    @ekankle หลายเดือนก่อน

    Also, oil is a commodity. The price is set by the market regardless of where it comes from. So it doesn't mean the price will change even if we used only domestic oil.

  • @thomasmcnicholas8656
    @thomasmcnicholas8656 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    In simple terms it’s not the grade oil our refineries can refine

  • @SudukoGaming
    @SudukoGaming 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    The protesters using/wearing crude oil-based clothing and products is always a massive irony to me.

    • @redfields5070
      @redfields5070 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They used their gas guzzling cars to get to the protest.

    • @6YJI9
      @6YJI9 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You ever see that meme for protestors surrounding an oil tanker ship on the water for being any eco-friendly, as the protestors where in kayaks made out of petroleum based products.

  • @DarronJames
    @DarronJames 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Oil makes us *Rich* 🛢️💰😎

    • @SeekTheTruthJesus
      @SeekTheTruthJesus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Makes the politicians rich not the citizens

    • @DarronJames
      @DarronJames 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@SeekTheTruthJesus I know

    • @amzarnacht6710
      @amzarnacht6710 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No, it makes a very small number of people very, very, VERY rich.
      But everyone else it makes poorer.

    • @DarronJames
      @DarronJames 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@amzarnacht6710 I know

    • @joehutmacher3323
      @joehutmacher3323 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Get your butt down to the gulf. Get a job offshore and you could be well off too.

  • @vickilindberg6336
    @vickilindberg6336 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We have enough oil to take care of ourselves. We just need the government to get out of the way!

  • @speedbuggy5573
    @speedbuggy5573 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm in California have lived here all my 60 plus years.
    Our biggest problems with oil, and just about everything else is and has been that we are and with few exceptions have been predominantly governed by The Far Left: That Doesn't Nessisarily Follow Their Own Rules When It Comes To "Upper Management" Need I Say More....