Tarkovsky on Religion

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ค. 2023
  • Excerpt from the 2019 documentary "Andrei Tarkovsky: A Cinema Prayer".
    Andrei Tarkovsky thinks that a true poet can only be a believer and explains why "culture cannot exist without religion".
    #andreitarkovsky #religion #andreirublev
  • ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน

ความคิดเห็น • 36

  • @fraterseamus
    @fraterseamus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

    Tarkovsky was on point here, I think there is a definite connection between spirituality, aesthetics and meaning. People who are anti-religion are usually people who have a very shallow understanding of why it has been an integral part of human civilization for thousands of years. It is easier to dismiss religion outright, than to actually struggle intellectually with what it means and how the world would be without it. Does religion have its flaws? Absolutely, but so do things like democracy ,capitalism and scientific method (all are affected by human bias and corruption); the proper way forward is to recognize those flaws and evolve intellectually and spiritually.

    • @antoinepetrov
      @antoinepetrov  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I absolutely agree! Thank you for the well-written comment. I might also add that this intellectual struggle with what religion means resulted in three of the greatest films of all time - Bergman's 'Silence of God' trilogy.

    • @fraterseamus
      @fraterseamus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@antoinepetrov BTW, I checked out the rest of your channel, you have very good taste in filmmakers, I subscribed for more.

    • @antoinepetrov
      @antoinepetrov  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@fraterseamus Thanks, I appreciate it

    • @bingo4519
      @bingo4519 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Great comment.

    • @Fridtjuv
      @Fridtjuv 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      well said

  • @wallppl
    @wallppl 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Tarkovsky has definitely complicated my relationship with religion, as I think he is quite accurate in his specific point in this excerpt. Even beyond this excerpt his films have really impacted my belief in religion (rather it's impact on society not really belief in a high being). You've got great taste in filmmakers! Thanks for the upload, been meaning to watch this documentary for a while.

  • @SiccazHD
    @SiccazHD 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    AMEN

  • @chapeaumonsieur2007
    @chapeaumonsieur2007 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We met on the metro, I feel dumb I haven’t say anything, hope you read this

  • @J35h13
    @J35h13 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    welcome comment section olympians

  • @khris461
    @khris461 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Replace religion with ideology and I think he has great points. For many civilisations that don't function with religion i.e. China , ideology plays a big role in shaping people's life, culture and a sense of purpose in order to persevere in their lives.

    • @WatersAbove77
      @WatersAbove77 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Not all ideologies are equal. Only one has a perfect mediator between heaven and earth.

    • @beyondz55
      @beyondz55 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No you got it backwards. Ideology IS new age religions that try to usurp judeo Christians

    • @bluewaves1137
      @bluewaves1137 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@WatersAbove77 there is no heaven

    • @bobtim1008
      @bobtim1008 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Ideology is a murderer

  • @philippgoenitzer3976
    @philippgoenitzer3976 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Well, even a genius can be wrong.

    • @Iziah_Smith
      @Iziah_Smith 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      He knows it from experience

    • @philippgoenitzer3976
      @philippgoenitzer3976 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What experiences do you mean?

    • @rangowilder
      @rangowilder 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      what is he wrong about

    • @philippgoenitzer3976
      @philippgoenitzer3976 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@rangowilder He seems to claim that there is an interdependence between religion and culture, as if there could be no cultures without religion. Why, then, do we see a correlation between the religiosity of a country and its anti-social phenomena, e.g. number of violent crimes? Logically, too, the assumption would only make sense if everyone professed the same religion (and the same interpretation of this religion). Otherwise, religion usually causes division (as Jesus said).
      Tarkovsky also thinks that a poet must be a believer. So he has to deny every atheist poet (e.g. Nietzsche) either his poetry or his atheism. As long as he, or anyone else, has not demonstrated this, it is wrong to claim that a poet cannot be an atheist.
      In the end, he does not seem to make any discernible distinction between religion and spirituality, as if they were the same thing.

    • @Iziah_Smith
      @Iziah_Smith 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@philippgoenitzer3976you are evidence of his words, you may not notice but with deep reflection, you may notice. It as well it seems you don't understand who Jesus Christ is.

  • @Freddy-Da-Freeloadah
    @Freddy-Da-Freeloadah 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    TARKOVSKY: I like his films, but this "Religion" stuff? He really was never a Christian, even if he depicted Christ! It's sad
    IMHO

    • @idkkidkk2445
      @idkkidkk2445 4 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      he was orthodox christian and nothing wrong about it? what is sad about it like girl leave him alone

  • @Ottointtl
    @Ottointtl หลายเดือนก่อน

    religion is the wrong word. tarkovsky fails here. the word he seeks is ritual.

  • @glassyjam217
    @glassyjam217 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    That's some crazy translation, at lease at the beginning! At at the beginning, Tarkovsky says if they is a a true poet, they cannot be un unbeliever