Decommissioning TriMet's Type 1 MAX light rail vehicles

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
  • As we say "farewell" to our Type 1 MAX light rail vehicles, we look back at the history of TriMet's first MAX trains, which went into service in 1986.
    This video also shows we're doing to bring our next generation of of MAX trains-the Type 6s-into our fleet. The new vehicles are expected to be in service in 2024.
    Music ID: MB01YY0JUYZPN3X

ความคิดเห็น • 38

  • @tiglu05
    @tiglu05 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    We've ridden your TriMet system on a recent visit to Portland (from Brisbane, Australia). You have a remarkable, peerless public transport system

    • @ThatCleanMT
      @ThatCleanMT 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The druggie bums must have been on a lunch break and you missed them 😂😂

    • @thndr_5468
      @thndr_5468 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the views of downtown must have been a nightmare lol

  • @dorothylewis4185
    @dorothylewis4185 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    TriMet One of the best transportation services i must say. I wish there was a museum where we could see all of the old vehicles that were used. All i can remember how people were able to smoke on the bus times have really changed.

  • @OddsandEnds
    @OddsandEnds 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    RIP type 1s you are my fav railcar old and reliable, yesterday when i was passing elmo yard i saw a line up 0f 5 type 1s with a type 6 hidden in the back, hopefully they will keep a car like the MTA does for retro rides. it brings a tear to my eye seeing my childhood railcar getting scraped

  • @QuintonMurdock
    @QuintonMurdock 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I love type 1’s so much. I’m sad to see them go

    • @BalooUriza
      @BalooUriza 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And to think the type 2 and 3 cars could have been like these if Trimet with a normal, high platform height like most metro systems. But because of this, we ended up stuck with the loud, uncomfortable, suspensionless (you can feel every imperfection of the track) and unreliable Siemens SD660 turds. Didn't think we could do worse than those, and then the Siemens S70 happened. Wish Trimet would go back to Bombardier or get something decent from Alstom or build in-house (since they bought Colorado Railcar).

  • @Shinycelebi
    @Shinycelebi 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Should save more then 1 set. Plenty of rail museums that could handle another set.

  • @rosecitybusman129
    @rosecitybusman129 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Will miss the Type 1s. Those are always going to be my favorite LRVs of the rolling stock. At least we have the Type 6s which are very nice.

  • @jordansean18
    @jordansean18 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you for giving us some followup on the retirement of these classics! I'm glad one of them is going to the electric railway museum!

  • @nancyoffenhiser4916
    @nancyoffenhiser4916 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm in tears..😢😢😢
    I loved those when I lived in Portland in 1989-97.
    I'm sad to see those go but when I visit again there will be new equipment... I'm glad you're saving one!

  • @shejustlikestofight
    @shejustlikestofight 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    so sad to see my besties go but at least one will be at the museum

  • @thundermothstudio5446
    @thundermothstudio5446 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I rode these all the time when my family would visit Portland when I was a child(2007-2014 or thereabouts). Sad to see them go, but at least they're going into the history books and staying in our memories.

  • @superjesse645
    @superjesse645 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's...Trimet won't be the same without these classics.

  • @A_Red_Fox
    @A_Red_Fox 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm just waiting for them to announce when the last run of the type1's happens.

  • @finalanswer19
    @finalanswer19 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Contrary to what a lot of operators would say, they were fun to operate! It took special handling to be able to give a smooth ride. I always enjoyed having a 1 in my consist.

    • @BalooUriza
      @BalooUriza 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And honestly even if the operator wasn't a perfectionist, it's amazing how much the suspension on those cars could soak up. Those could sail through high-traffic intersections and you wouldn't even feel the ruts, meanwhile all the SD660s and S70s will try to knock you on your ass, and that's when you're near the cabs. Like trying to stand in a major earthquake the closer to midcar you get. Terrible, no idea why we bought three fleets of those godawful things.
      There were a lot of features I really appreciated as a passenger, too, like the fact the heat worked way better on those cars than any other and there was more room and more floorspace for more passengers on those than any other cars except the S700 (type 5 and 6) despite having the smallest interior. All the dead space above people's heads was what isn't a thing on the Bombardier cars, and that's space that doesn't have to be heated or cooled, so the less of that, the better. All the other cars had to work around the wheels in various oddball ways that took space away from passengers. And it could have been avoided if Portland went with high platforms for its metro system like a normal city...
      Literally all my complaints about the HVAC on any of the trainsets could entirely be mitigated if operators were more prone to "release" doors and if doors timed out in release mode (like after 15 seconds or so, the door returns to being closed-but-unlocked) so the heat stays out in the summer and in during the winter a little easier, with the added benefit of being a bit dryer on wet days.

    • @finalanswer19
      @finalanswer19 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BalooUriza funny you say that about the doors on release. At the end of the line stations, it’s actually SOP to close the doors and put them on release, however, a good 95% of operators leave the doors open on purpose. All have their excuses and reasonings but it screws up the HVACs. Then wonder why they never work.

    • @BalooUriza
      @BalooUriza 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@finalanswer19 I'm old enough to remember it being SOP to release doors only at any stop in jacket weather (even if passengers ended up opening all 8 doors anyway at transfer island stations) and stop request cables since stops were by request east of Lloyd Center.

    • @finalanswer19
      @finalanswer19 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BalooUriza there was talk (2+ish years ago?) about reinstating that as a policy to lower doors-off-platform rule violations. It was studied and even a few trips done with that as “practice runs”. The train lost no time because of it. So what did management do? They threw that out because it “would be too confusing” and went with a stricter, morale-destroying rule instead. Ironically, after the new rule went into affect, doors-off-platform violations went down for new operators but went up for veteran operators. One particular manager at TriMet blames ODOT for requiring that specific thing when in reality all ODOT said was to find a way to reduce violations and that guy with a big head did his own thing anyway and shoved it down everybody’s throats. Anyway, I’m ranting now. 🤪 but yes, I agree, doors on release as a standard practice is a good idea.

    • @BalooUriza
      @BalooUriza 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@finalanswer19 Another thing that would avoid the problem is getting rid of the S700 cars (the type 4s) instead of the type 1s

  • @MatNichols-iz9dy
    @MatNichols-iz9dy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'll miss these sets. Although they did smell like piss half the time they are so pretty and have run my childhood

  • @jonw999999
    @jonw999999 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hope OERM takes good care of it. Some of their cars are really rotting away and seems like nothing gets restored.

  • @Stevenps09
    @Stevenps09 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When’s the type 6 MAX going to be put in service?

  • @josepho.8039
    @josepho.8039 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Im not crying your crying!!!

  • @TheBurlingtonTransitFan
    @TheBurlingtonTransitFan 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Will any of the Type 1s be preserved, like your 28xx series New Flyer buses?

  • @VexBeatOfficial
    @VexBeatOfficial 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Please, at least leave ONE intact

    • @jtheninja0
      @jtheninja0 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      One of them is going to the Oregon Electric Railway Museum!

    • @rosecitybusman129
      @rosecitybusman129 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I heard that it would be Car 103. A Type 1 that hasn't gotten overhauled.

  • @noahleroylecompte8658
    @noahleroylecompte8658 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are the type ones still in service right now?

    • @oregonpaul3752
      @oregonpaul3752 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, most of them are

  • @Radithor
    @Radithor 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Give me the trains

  • @centredoorplugsthornton4112
    @centredoorplugsthornton4112 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So none to any other transit system. Like some of San Diego's LRVs went to Mendoza Argentina for its light rail. Eighteen for a light rail line in Knoxville til Tennessee outlawed and criminalized light rail development.

    • @edwardmiessner6502
      @edwardmiessner6502 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tennessee outlawed it? Why are Republican states so d@mn foolish?

    • @rosecitybusman129
      @rosecitybusman129 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I would love to see another Transit Agency that would get the Type 1s. Also Tennessee is very stupid for outlawing Light Rail. We should be building more

    • @centredoorplugsthornton4112
      @centredoorplugsthornton4112 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rosecitybusman129 it's not really outlawed, but the governor, legislature and TDOT all have to approve any development. And since Tennessee is super gerrymandered GOP, it may as well be illegal.

  • @coopercannella-joyner770
    @coopercannella-joyner770 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Took them long enough, but they will spend money on there trains instead of there homeless problem. Great job Portland I’m so glad I left.

  • @grujber7342
    @grujber7342 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Can't stand these cars