Things in Rings Review: Red Ring, Yellow Ring. Blue Ring, Onion Ring

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @steelbeard151
    @steelbeard151 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I think I would use a variant where if you put your card down correctly, your reward is just that you do not draw a new one. But you don't get to go again. You can only get rid of one card per turn.

    • @argyem6688
      @argyem6688 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I was thinking the same thing. Or maybe you get one additional turn, but no more than two, so that others have a chance to use one player's success to inform their own turns, instead of being one-shot.

  • @ImaginEric
    @ImaginEric 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Played this at Origins with a buddy and two strangers and had a blast. I’ve pre-ordered it once getting home.
    Don’t worry too much about winning or “solving” everything, just have fun. It’s a party game. Parties should be about fun.

  • @chuckm1961
    @chuckm1961 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Every table I saw or participated in at Origins was a blast, and I cannot wait to get my hands on this one.

  • @JorWat25
    @JorWat25 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    As a lover of Zendo, I really want to give this one a go. I think would be interesting to play this by making up your own rules (though still in the three categories). Gives the Knower a bit more to do.

  • @cosmicbeet
    @cosmicbeet 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Oh wow that box is wayyyyy tinier than I expected!

  • @JorWat25
    @JorWat25 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    1:43, the red ring was 'man made', I think you meant to put 'ocean' in yellow and blue.

  • @RynoKenny
    @RynoKenny 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Three yellow rings doesn’t require three copies. Just use three yellow cards for the three rings.

  • @TheAmazingYeti
    @TheAmazingYeti 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Just watching the rules teach, I immediately knew it wasn't for me. Just sounds frustrating.

  • @olanmills64
    @olanmills64 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Camilla's eye roll after "It caaaan be!" cracked me up 😆

  • @CardboardEast
    @CardboardEast 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love this game! I got to play this at Tantrum Con earlier this year & instantly loved it!

  • @jmlitwiller
    @jmlitwiller 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This also gave me vibes of Cryptid, which is one of my favorite games of all time

  • @TheErnieforss
    @TheErnieforss 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow this is basically game changer the game

  • @BoardGameBill
    @BoardGameBill 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As you showed, there are a number of "word" cards, which is good, but I would be worried about the number of rule cards. After a few plays, the players are going to remember the rule cards they have already seen. This seems problematic for the replayability of the game.

    • @thedicetower
      @thedicetower  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      We've played a decent amount of times and mostly stayed on level 1 rule cards. Haven't seen too many repeats, but once you get those down, you can move on to level 2 or 3 cards. You can even make up your own rules.

  • @Singulitarian
    @Singulitarian 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I don't have time to fine tune a game so that it's fun.

    • @thedicetower
      @thedicetower  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not quite the point I was making. The game is fun, but you have multiple ways of adjusting the difficulty to find the challenge level you like to play at. -Chris

    • @Singulitarian
      @Singulitarian 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@thedicetower Appreciate the response and knew what you were saying. I'm just saying that with limited time to play games, I'll buy one that you guys think is good to go out of the box, rather than one that requires an optimization process involving multiple variables from competitive/cooperative, x players, y rings, z card difficulty, k number of cards, etc.

  • @manuelmejorada4967
    @manuelmejorada4967 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😁