in your 12th video exante and ex post at 2:43 you said (slide is also there) that S=I are always equal in keynes, but in this video , at 21:13 you said S and I are not equal in keynes. and why you did not compared S and I of classicals and keynessian in terms of expost and exante.
@@samarthsidhi classicals believed that savings will always be equal to investment(S=I) at equilibrium bcz of flexibility in interest rates ie there could be imbalance between them but eventually they will be balanced bcz of flexibility in interest rate. But Keynes believed that there's no compulsion that S=I and that too only bcz of flexibility in interest rates but he argued that S also depends upon income of an individual, and I depends upon roi and MEC(marginal efficiency of capital), therefore S could be higher or lower than I at any given pt. of time.
Sir, i have a random doubt from macroeconomics. What are the post-keynesian theories of determination of income and output ? Can you name the theories that what we have to study exactly ?
Sir thank u soo much. But I have a doubt in savings and investment where u said in one of ur videos that in case of keynes SAVINGS WILL ALWAYS BE EQUAL TO INVESTMENT and this concept was explained with Ex post saving and Investment in case of kynes and in case of classicals they said saving and investment will be equal at equilibrium only and this concept is explained with the help of ex ante saving and investment. But here in this video u are saying that classical said Savings =Investment always. How? Plz explain
In one of your videos you said that according to keynes, "Savings is always equal to Investment" and you explained this with ex-Ante things and all, but in this video you are saying that according to keynes Savings cannot be equal to Investment. Please explain this dilemma. Moreover, according to me Savings is not only a function of Disposable income, it is also a function of interest rate as well, as, if Interest rate increases, then people will stop investing and save more. Elaborate on these points as well.
Bhaiya bahut dhundhne pr is topic pr video mila jo achhe se explain kiye hai .Thank you bhaiya😌😊
awesome style of teaching
Thank you so much sir 🙏🙏.
Bahut hi shandar
Sir please make video on Pareto efficiency
in your 12th video exante and ex post at 2:43 you said (slide is also there) that S=I are always equal in keynes, but in this video , at 21:13 you said S and I are not equal in keynes.
and why you did not compared S and I of classicals and keynessian in terms of expost and exante.
Exactly
Exactly,sir please explain it ....
@@samarthsidhi classicals believed that savings will always be equal to investment(S=I) at equilibrium bcz of flexibility in interest rates ie there could be imbalance between them but eventually they will be balanced bcz of flexibility in interest rate.
But
Keynes believed that there's no compulsion that S=I and that too only bcz of flexibility in interest rates but he argued that S also depends upon income of an individual, and I depends upon roi and MEC(marginal efficiency of capital), therefore S could be higher or lower than I at any given pt. of time.
Excellent work
Classical vs new cassical pa b bna dain
You are a good teacher , thankyou ❤
Excellent sir
Very helpfull video
Excellent sir 💯👍
Great work
Sir Keynesian and monterist and also new classical ,new Keynesian discuss please sir big request 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Sir make videos monetarism vs Keynesian
Thank You Sir 😊
Thankyou sir for this video 🙏
Sir, i have a random doubt from macroeconomics.
What are the post-keynesian theories of determination of income and output ? Can you name the theories that what we have to study exactly ?
Awesome
IS curve LM curve also discussed sir pleased 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Very soon🙏.. Do share🎥
Neo classical or new classical is same or different?
No.. they both are different.
@@LearntoCompete can you please explain me the basic difference of this?
Sir thank u soo much. But I have a doubt in savings and investment where u said in one of ur videos that in case of keynes SAVINGS WILL ALWAYS BE EQUAL TO INVESTMENT and this concept was explained with Ex post saving and Investment in case of kynes and in case of classicals they said saving and investment will be equal at equilibrium only and this concept is explained with the help of ex ante saving and investment. But here in this video u are saying that classical said Savings =Investment always. How? Plz explain
Saving = Investment at equilibrium level in kynes theory but in classical saving and investment always be equal.
Bhaiyon, bheno, ye konse ke syllabus me hai?.. Hmare 12 th boards me de diye hain isko
Cgbse boards me
In one of your videos you said that according to keynes, "Savings is always equal to Investment" and you explained this with ex-Ante things and all, but in this video you are saying that according to keynes Savings cannot be equal to Investment. Please explain this dilemma. Moreover, according to me Savings is not only a function of Disposable income, it is also a function of interest rate as well, as, if Interest rate increases, then people will stop investing and save more. Elaborate on these points as well.
Yes I am also confused in this point
Sit post Keynesian kovi
Like no 11
thora speed dhere padha liya kro,tej padhte bhi ho or lam bi video bhi rakhte ho.time barbad krwa rhe bas