Which approach is the most reliable in terms of results accuracy? Thanks in advance Also, thank you for the most clear and concise videos on Creo SImulate, I gretely appreciate your effort to help the community, it's nobble.
Hi, Solid mesh is the most accurate method if done with appropriate mesh refinement. Unfortunately, it’s not preferred for large models dealing with sheet metal due to its diminishing returns on result accuracy. Industries have adapted mid surfaces mesh as their option to deal with thin solids due to balance between reasonable accuracy and computational time. One can choose to go with solid mesh in the area of interest and keep rest of the areas shell as your geometry allows. Unfortunately, there is no one line answer .
Which approach is the most reliable in terms of results accuracy?
Thanks in advance
Also, thank you for the most clear and concise videos on Creo SImulate, I gretely appreciate your effort to help the community, it's nobble.
Hi, Solid mesh is the most accurate method if done with appropriate mesh refinement. Unfortunately, it’s not preferred for large models dealing with sheet metal due to its diminishing returns on result accuracy. Industries have adapted mid surfaces mesh as their option to deal with thin solids due to balance between reasonable accuracy and computational time. One can choose to go with solid mesh in the area of interest and keep rest of the areas shell as your geometry allows. Unfortunately, there is no one line answer .
@nothingbutengineering thank you, I think you explained it quite well. I have a clearer picture now. I wish you the best!
Hi..how to diagnose poor meshing during auto meshing in fea run in creo?
What error are you getting?
hi, how can you make a tidier mesh (like sweepable)?
You can try mapped mesh option in “AutoGEM” controls.
if you dont mind may i know what's your desiignation.i guess you are cae engineer.
Design Engineer cum Analyst
Thanks sir very helpful video