Three-Minute Legal Talks: Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 6

  • @hiddenInsight486
    @hiddenInsight486 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    R I.p Chevron and brand X
    The people can dream

  • @oldones59
    @oldones59 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To construe that NIMS requires private fishers to pay federal observers' salaries is a predatory practice. Would the fisjers also be liable if an observer got injured?

  • @matthennagersguitarlessons
    @matthennagersguitarlessons ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Get rid of it!

  • @daveapex493
    @daveapex493 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think 'Chevron' also has our state's administrative agencies believing they have 'all' of the power to interpret their empowering statutes and try to completely ignore step one. The statute ordered an administrative agency to write a 'required curriculum' for commercial schools and that agency acts like this document is required by law, without ever adopting the document in rule as per the requirements of the APA. Also, there is too much presumption the staff of the administrative agency are experts dealing in that field. Sorry, many agency staff act like - just because they hold a certain position and were given some internal training - they are an expert. I hope 'Chevron' is gone, so agency folks and those dealing with them - will get back to reading the law, instead of relying upon or fearing the policy of the month. Thanks

  • @AlexanderNewman-v1x
    @AlexanderNewman-v1x 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is good for America. Less useless regulation by unelected government bureaucrats.
    If Congress wants to pass a law requiring federal observers on fishing boats, they are free to do so.

  • @zacsimillion
    @zacsimillion 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bye bye bureaucrats