i love the real-world POV explanation about liking games, and how randomizing is definitely necessary in certain situations. But u really connect w/ your audience when u use self-examples as such.
I heard that when playing games with cats, you can make use of the…purrr-ification theorem 😎 But seriously, these videos are amazing. Thank you so much for all of them!
thanks for the great lecture ! i have something to clarify at 14:30 - the last equation for p, is there a typo? because (10 + 2 - E^2) does not converge to 10 when E -> 0 Shouldnt it be (10 + E - E^2) instead?
Thanks for the lecture. One question, does it matter how do you perturb the game? I mean, you left the bottom right payoff unchanged, is there a reason for it?
It's totally connected. It provides an alternative interpretation for those who might be unwilling to accept the premise of a mixed strategy. The more you get into mathematics, the more you will see this kind of theorem, and the beauty of them is that they connect concepts that might on the surface not appear to be related.
i love the real-world POV explanation about liking games, and how randomizing is definitely necessary in certain situations.
But u really connect w/ your audience when u use self-examples as such.
I heard that when playing games with cats, you can make use of the…purrr-ification theorem 😎
But seriously, these videos are amazing. Thank you so much for all of them!
thanks for the great lecture ! i have something to clarify
at 14:30 - the last equation for p, is there a typo?
because (10 + 2 - E^2) does not converge to 10 when E -> 0
Shouldnt it be (10 + E - E^2) instead?
Good catch. It looks like it should be 10 + e - e^2.
i got 10 +e - e^2, maybe i made a careless error? hmm...
Typo at 9:18? The bottom red Theta should have subscript 2 not 1? Love yr vids btw
You are correct. I really need to re-do this one...
Thank you. I enjoy your videos!
Thanks for the lecture. One question, does it matter how do you perturb the game? I mean, you left the bottom right payoff unchanged, is there a reason for it?
You could do it with that payoff as well.
More game theory :)
Hey mate is the Purification Theorem in your book?
Nope, the book stops at around video number 40 or so.
@@Gametheory101 thanks. Just bought it a couple of weeks ago and am studying purification theorem. Time for book 2?
I get your idea but think that this is a stupid idea. Understanding something easy from something difficult and not that connected.
It's totally connected. It provides an alternative interpretation for those who might be unwilling to accept the premise of a mixed strategy. The more you get into mathematics, the more you will see this kind of theorem, and the beauty of them is that they connect concepts that might on the surface not appear to be related.
It’s necessary to understand these theorem if you want to go deep in the research field