Please have more discussions about Delueze, especially where you really dive in to him and not rush. Your commentaries are so valuable and so interesting. Heck do as many as possible!!
This was amazing. I've watched all your vids on deleuze and the talks with Buchanan and stivale but I found this one the most accessible. I've been watching videos and lectures on Deleuze for months now and only through this talk and the A-Z interviews have the concepts started to make sense due to your elaborated examples. The rapport between you makes it really flow, especially between 20-52 minutes you accelerate into sync, bouncing off each other's descriptions so well that you, with brevity, bring in and assemble together multiple Deleuzian concepts by relating them through his other concepts and concrete analogies that really connect for me. This is an indispensable resource for myself and would appreciate many more conversations between you guys, possibly on the meaning of molar and molecular, expanding on examples of a body without organs and how that relates to: lines of flight, decoding etc. Also the fold concept. Thanks
thank you very much, please do continue talking about deleuze, if you run out of ideas an analysis on his interactions with hegel would be greatly appreciated
excellent discussion, i'm listing to the section on rhizomes and moving onto the nomad and i am struck by the idea of free flowing and random. Could you say that the early instances of the 'Arab Spring' where rhizomatic, in it being organic and partly organised through social media/ the internet. I am also reminded of the London riots of 2011 where the blackberry messaging system was cited as the main tool of organisation. The problem then becomes what happens next in these situations of resistance with no head or sense of direction? does Deleuze or 'D & G' go into this?
came back here after watching Todd May's Deleuze lectures. everything is making more sense. the problem I'm having right now is what happens AFTER deconstructing identities, hierarchies, and state processes? (psychology example) yeah, anger isn't 'just there' it is A solution to the problem field based upon the different relational intensities. but what happens when we overcome the dogma of thought imposed by Freud? I know the answer is creation through experimentation but I'm having trouble with what's leftover and how to move forward.
I never missed a Daniel W. Smith lecture in my five years as a graduate student... though I only audited those courses... Anyway, Dan's essays are excellent!... and so is this channel!
There is a youtube channel called Every Frame a Painting that makes video essays on films. They made one on Chuck Jones, the directer of Looney Tunes, and me listening to you guys explaining Deleuze really reminded me of how Chuck creates his work by studying things outside of film, then bringing that back into his work
Hi loved this so much but I'm having trouble with differentiating between assemblages, multiplicities, body without organs and rhizomes as they seem to be referred to interchangeably. Also the same with line of flight and desiring production. Are any of these in line with difference repetition and the dark precursor? Thanks for this such a great accessible way into theory.
Hah! Messiaen was more like trying to escape the concentration camp and also 12 tone atonal music which is already infinite deterritorialized, i believe! But great example too... I love his opera and of course quartet for the end of time written in the camp. I could be wrong too look it ☝
I don't think I'd get on well with Deleuze. As far as I'm concerned the "original" exists/is referred to, through the communicability, or interpretation, of what has gone before. The "original" only comes into existence with the copy. This trace, this interpretation is a scholarly act, but also a creative one. It figures that creativity should be at the top of the tree. Regarding science, I would regard it as secondary: first things are close-at-hand, and we interpret in the life-world, then - secondarily - we attend to categories and establishing an objectivity for those categories. I'm not familiar with Deleuze, but the point about resistence as a form of creativity reminds me of Benjamin's Thesis; after all, the rune which is resurrected/indiced with the present moment, to challenge the power of smooth progress is a form of creativity: you labour to now-time, to the interruption
After listening to your videos on French Modernist and Postmodernists I had a pretty shocking insight. If Schizoid thought is the way, perhaps we need to rethink the left stand on Religion.
Please have more discussions about Delueze, especially where you really dive in to him and not rush. Your commentaries are so valuable and so interesting. Heck do as many as possible!!
Yes. More Deleuze, please. I would like to hear what Chris had to say about "Univosity" and the metaphysics of Deleuze's philosophy.
definetly! I hope they pick up this thread again!
40:20 on looses the arrow.
This was amazing. I've watched all your vids on deleuze and the talks with Buchanan and stivale but I found this one the most accessible. I've been watching videos and lectures on Deleuze for months now and only through this talk and the A-Z interviews have the concepts started to make sense due to your elaborated examples. The rapport between you makes it really flow, especially between 20-52 minutes you accelerate into sync, bouncing off each other's descriptions so well that you, with brevity, bring in and assemble together multiple Deleuzian concepts by relating them through his other concepts and concrete analogies that really connect for me. This is an indispensable resource for myself and would appreciate many more conversations between you guys, possibly on the meaning of molar and molecular, expanding on examples of a body without organs and how that relates to: lines of flight, decoding etc. Also the fold concept. Thanks
Clear, concise, and with accessible explanation of all the lingo. Excellent work!
Yep, more of this please.
Pills was symbolically Castrated at the end. In the pure Zizekian sense of the expression. Great Pod!
More Deleuze please. You guys are great. Thank you for putting the video and podcasts together.
Thanks for sharing this podcast introducing Deleuze's ideas to the people, who haven't had the opportunity to learn about them yet. Solidarity.
This was fantastic!!!!
17:45 hierarchy of state and family. Confucius.
"let's use a little bit jargon here".... This is too good. A true deluezian speaks in this way . A great introductory talk .
You should've let him talk more because he's the scholar! Otherwise it's excellent.
Would love to hear more! So good🎉
thank you very much, please do continue talking about deleuze, if you run out of ideas an analysis on his interactions with hegel would be greatly appreciated
excellent discussion, i'm listing to the section on rhizomes and moving onto the nomad and i am struck by the idea of free flowing and random. Could you say that the early instances of the 'Arab Spring' where rhizomatic, in it being organic and partly organised through social media/ the internet. I am also reminded of the London riots of 2011 where the blackberry messaging system was cited as the main tool of organisation. The problem then becomes what happens next in these situations of resistance with no head or sense of direction? does Deleuze or 'D & G' go into this?
came back here after watching Todd May's Deleuze lectures. everything is making more sense. the problem I'm having right now is what happens AFTER deconstructing identities, hierarchies, and state processes? (psychology example) yeah, anger isn't 'just there' it is A solution to the problem field based upon the different relational intensities. but what happens when we overcome the dogma of thought imposed by Freud? I know the answer is creation through experimentation but I'm having trouble with what's leftover and how to move forward.
More intros like this. Loved it.
More please and thank you
This is great, thanks
Really good. I love the podcast. What Deleuze's book do you recommend?
Keep up the good work, could you do more videos on Deluze?
Thanks a lot as I am planning on reading him
I never missed a Daniel W. Smith lecture in my five years as a graduate student... though I only audited those courses... Anyway, Dan's essays are excellent!... and so is this channel!
i guess i plan on reading, Deleuze and Guattari’s “Anti-Oedipus”,
How did it go?
More of this
There is a youtube channel called Every Frame a Painting that makes video essays on films. They made one on Chuck Jones, the directer of Looney Tunes, and me listening to you guys explaining Deleuze really reminded me of how Chuck creates his work by studying things outside of film, then bringing that back into his work
decoding can also be called or is part of the development of "culture jamming"
Hi loved this so much but I'm having trouble with differentiating between assemblages, multiplicities, body without organs and rhizomes as they seem to be referred to interchangeably. Also the same with line of flight and desiring production. Are any of these in line with difference repetition and the dark precursor? Thanks for this such a great accessible way into theory.
What's the name of the pianista?
Much appreciated
This is great :)
Hah! Messiaen was more like trying to escape the concentration camp and also 12 tone atonal music which is already infinite deterritorialized, i believe! But great example too... I love his opera and of course quartet for the end of time written in the camp. I could be wrong too look it ☝
More
"Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds."
I don't think I'd get on well with Deleuze. As far as I'm concerned the "original" exists/is referred to, through the communicability, or interpretation, of what has gone before. The "original" only comes into existence with the copy. This trace, this interpretation is a scholarly act, but also a creative one. It figures that creativity should be at the top of the tree. Regarding science, I would regard it as secondary: first things are close-at-hand, and we interpret in the life-world, then - secondarily - we attend to categories and establishing an objectivity for those categories.
I'm not familiar with Deleuze, but the point about resistence as a form of creativity reminds me of Benjamin's Thesis; after all, the rune which is resurrected/indiced with the present moment, to challenge the power of smooth progress is a form of creativity: you labour to now-time, to the interruption
Yea boiz
After listening to your videos on French Modernist and Postmodernists I had a pretty shocking insight. If Schizoid thought is the way, perhaps we need to rethink the left stand on Religion.
More Delueze
based second comment
Don't call him pill 😂 man !