@@user-ci2mn1oy3wI still haven’t gotten my BEAR arms as promised by the constitution, but I do luckily get to BARE arms. Maybe they meant I get to bare my arms to get my own pair of bear arms.
That is not the issue. They are the first ones to go under martial law, so there is a context under which they disappear in the blink of an eye and it is not only legal but considered good. The problem is not thinking those rights are essencial, but under what context they should be suspended or where is the blurry line. We have ignored the Khashoggi situation because of national interest, the same as Snowden or Assange, weapons of mass destruction in Irak, etc. ... and there are clearly 2 camps for each topic and clearly one outcome that violates all what we believe for a particular context that some believe to be more extremal than the others. What he is saying is an oversimplification, because for him there are such contexts as well, he just have not thought of it that way
He makes it clear that what matters most to him are truth and freedom. A religion has nothing to do with either. On the other hand, if you live in a bubble of beliefs and pseudo-revealed truths, you're free to submit to them, as long as you don't impose your point of view on others as the way to go...
It is a stretch to call Neil Tyson a physicist. He did research for only a brief time. He has a total of five 1st author papers, all from the 80s and 90s. Were they exceptional papers? No. Harvard turned him down for post grad. University of Texas dissolved his doctoral committee and showed him the door. For the past two or three decades he has been a pop science celebrity. And much of his material is wrong.
@@Upsideround Several books. A University professor. A very successful podcaster. Now, what is Gad out of his depth about? Or perhaps are you simply on the side of less freedom of speech?
@SarahHuntsman78 the world we live in. You can't change everyone, you only can focus on change within yourself. It's an evil world, be with them or be yourself!
@SarahHuntsman888 I can't think of any career politicians that fit my definition of success. The OP was talking about having to remember your lies though. So if a politician lies yesterday, they have to remember their lie today so that they can defend what they said and continue the deceit. If they don't remember their lie from yesterday then they will be caught in the lie.
@SuperNatural-qu9lz It’s hard for modern westerners to admit that this demoralized individualism is failing and it’s being outcompeted by tribalists. We use science to, in strictly humanist and utilitarian terms, create what we know to be good, create welfare and love as a lifestyle phenomenon that we can measure. That's our meager hoard of truth, a materialist reduction. As an approach, the project has clearly failed, but we are desperately trying to salvage what we can from it and a lot of our political and cultural malaise comes from refusing to accept that we can't use an algorithm or productivity numbers to overcome our self-awareness. That’s the issue with the materialist algorithm idolizers who cling to the idea you will be allowed to remain unaffiliated and meaning will come from more naval gazing while slinking away.
I think people misinterpret Lex Fridman's positive approach. I personally thought it was stupid go a long time but the more that I've watched him the more that I have realize that it is a very calculated approach to really get the people he interviews comfortable to be speaking on their true views
No one is just putting their true views on Lex if they don’t want to, just because of his approach. He had the worst interview with the ceo of Pfizer. Complete fluff piece. Ridiculous and embarrassing as an interviewer. Completely let him off the hook.
Fridman often comes off as naive, gullible and lacking conviction (which itself is something a construction, but not put to any interesting end). His guests get to have their way with him. It’s what makes Rogan a bad interviewer as well. It’s one thing if your show is just about broing down and cracking jokes with your buds, it’s another thing to be sitting down with incredibly rich, powerful and influential people and simply providing them a platform to telegraph an image and a message without trying to break down these constructions and challenge what’s going on behind them. Which is what good journalists do. Fridman and Rogan aren’t interested in this. And so as if by default they end up as crass promoters, industry cheerleaders and PR puppets.
Tom Bilye is a fair and open minded Human being.. wish we had more like HIM. Thank you Tom for your educating the public and letting them figure it out by listening for themselves and hearing all these Guests positions/Views. Bravo! Knowledge is Power... and continuing to listen open mindedly is a positive approach to positive change. Awareness is key.
8:30: Even Neil dT should appreciate this one. He’s describing a modification to the Doppler Effect. It’s the Dopeler Effect: the tendency for stupid ideas to seem smarter the faster they come at you. 😂
Lex is the best of all of them because he does come from a good place and operates in good faith. He LISTENS. He asks good questions. He does fight back when necessary. More importantly, he has a history most people do not have and extensive experience with a darkness. He chose light. Do not fault him for this. There is room for EVERYONE. I typically like Gad Saad but strongly disagree with him here.
@@MiloTimberlake After being raised by Germans, I can confirm this is true. No love or much of any emotion in our house aside from anger and abuse. Hurt people hurt people. Lex just points out the obvious.
@@TheMoneyGPS I watched that entire interview and do not recall tears. He was visibly upset several times by Kanye's comments on jews, but he held his composure.
"My North Star is human flousrishjing. I don't think you can get there without freedom of speech" - As comments are actively disappearing from this very comment section.
It's definitely this platform. It's getting worse by the day and you wouldn't believe how many words and topics are hit by the Ministry Of Wrong Think by now. It's especially brutal once you start commenting about politics, political science, the current cultural issues etc.
The illustrious founding fathers were only thinking about their own class, they were hypocrites and knew it, they held slaves, sure free speech if you're a landowner, white and 21. The constitution needs to be understood in context, it is an obsolete document now.
I loved NDT, but he's absolutely diving into realms he knows absolutely nothing about and just providing a lib answer with zero critical thinking whatsoever
If he stuck with trying to make people excited about science and trying to get more funding for NASA because of all the things the space race produced, I would still think he's awesome. He's lost his damn mind though.
As far as Lex, some of it is anchoring yes, but some of it is also "I am not going to ruffle any bushes and play in the safe zone".... I like listening to his podcast from time to time, but I am also wondering that because he doesn't tackle a lot of blatant controversial subjects, as he plays the neutral card or safe card all the time, he probably has the "least" impact on anything changing at all.
There are plenty people who want to dig deep in adversarial/controversial subjects. Lex comes from the want to dig into the person and motivations show a different side , not the public facing one, not the polished one, but to discuss in how the person understands the world around them, not even what motivates them necessarily, but what informs their opinion. That is a truly rare form of interview at this time.
And that's why he will be one of the few will remain in history. Because I history we have people who change and challenge the past, and the ones who documented the past. This two are very very important to coexist. Otherwise you'll have a distorted about the past as we often have.
Also, in our world is a lack of neutralised discussions. Which usually is boring and is not making any sense. But because we don't have any today, we feel the need of it and lex is very popular by doing it. You literally can't find anywhere else in this world what Lex is offering.
Lex is awesome. Tiny little ego, unlike this fella. It is so refreshing to have Lex on TH-cam, with sooooo many fractured egos here, clamouring for attention.
1. He didn't have a "tiny little ego" when Kanye started talking about jews. 2. What's the appeal of that guy? His boring, robotic, monotone voice? His silly, childish, naive worldview? Or maybe it's his dashing and glowing charisma? Maybe it's his humor?
I’m an Independent Latino! Thank you Tom!! Lex Friedman is KING 👑 !!! Why Lex is doing Super well is because he is an articulate and humble human being.
Gad’s most viewed videos are always about Sam Harris. They get more views than any long form interviews of any guests. He has a good reason to keep doing them in perpetuity $$$$
why does him saying that about himself make him arrogant? Can one not speak about themself in a sincere and positive way without being branded as arrogant? Is it possible that Gad's confidence touches on the part of you that wishes to say something similar but won't allow it?
00:00 🌟 Having a North Star principle, like human flourishing, guides actions towards improving the well-being of others. 01:18 💬 Freedom of speech is crucial for human flourishing and must be defended. 03:37 🤔 Authenticity in grappling with complex issues, even if conclusions may be disagreed upon, fosters intellectual growth. 06:14 📚 Variety, including intellectual diversity, is essential for personal growth and happiness. 08:02 🔄 Intellectual humility is vital, welcoming challenges and diverse perspectives for growth. 10:56 🔍 Scrutinizing and debating ideas fosters antifragility, strengthening one's position through examination and critique.
Speak for yourself. If you pay very close attention to your words, you will likely realize just how many generalizations you make. Those generalizations are the enemy of nuance, and nuance is the path to understanding. Perception is everything. Watch media all-day and you may completely fail to grasp any sense of progress being made by humanity and that pessimism will control your behaviors. If morale is low in an individual, that individual will ultimately be making decisions based on fear. If morale is high, that individual will try to make the world a better place.
@@limitisillusion7 this comment was too confrontational. We must speak to them like they are drunk. It technically is an 'us' conversation anyway. We are all one
@@hobgoblinhollow4966 The individuals make up the whole, but diversity is still a good thing. But diversity is not division. Lack of acceptance of diversity is division. If we accept each other's individuality, we effectively prioritize our human identity while celebrating our individuality. It really comes down to that: prioritize your human identity above any other subgroup and we'll have world peace. It will also make us a lot better at solving problems if we choose a human vs environment perspective, as opposed to human vs human. To understand how you actions effect yourself _through_ others is the epitome of wisdom in my mind. The golden rule is a good start, but it falls short when it comes to digging us out of the vicious cycles of low morale that we fall into as a species. Low morale means reckless behavior. If you don't care about yourself, the golden rule doesn't work very well and you can justify anything.
Eh I like Lex, I don’t need him to solve the worlds issues. He’s representing a truth which is easily overlooked and I don’t think he’s being dishonest.
2:30 the problem with Bret Kavenaugh, in fact any candidate for such office as a Supreme Court, is that there is a big difference between a criminal court hearing and a Supreme Court nomination hearing. Just because someone wouldn't be found guilty in a criminal court (high standards) doesn't mean they should automatically be found worthy by Congress to be a Justice or any high official. In other words, losing a nomination vote in the Congress doesn't mean that you are a guilty criminal, it just means that you are not a good enough nominee in eyes of the elected representatives.
Love and truth: that is christianity. You cannot put truth below love and compassion as everything fall appart, but you cannot act without love as everything also crumble. So sometime you have to be harsh to push for truth even when it's unconfortable.
Points for solid principles and yes, authenticity. I actually disagree with just about everything said beyond that, but I can at least get through it enough to begin to understand. The bar for conversation may be on the floor these days, but a win is a win, so thanks for sharing, guys.
One thing intellectual titans such as Gad have a hard time wrapping their head around is the fact that some peoples derision for you as an individual might outweigh their exigency to discuss the weather, let alone a particular topic. They are overwhelmingly driven by their disputatiousness and find no room for interpersonal abstractions.
I don't know. Always be wary of those that pump up their own tyre, whilst deflating others in the same breath. Most of these talking heads lose credibility when they resort to doing this......and then the Orange Himler. What dos that mean?
Lex is a plant. A boring, possibly autistic, uncharismatic nerd with no sense of humor comes out of nowhere and has one of the biggest podcasts in the world, hosting some of the most popular people in the world....? The bubble is bursting and this is just the beginning.
@@Harker777 Orange Himmler was some left/Neocon's talking points about Trump. Comparing him to Himmler in effect. It was like i am for the freedom of speech but not when it came to suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story as that would have benefitted the orange Himmler. Meaning Trump. That is what some people were saying in some conservative but anti Trump spaces. Gaad is saying he rejects that premise and made him think differently about the people/institutions that would proclaim that they were ambassadors for freedom of speech...Except...
I think Gad Saad has a point... Lex does not have Bernie Sanders on his show.. and He leans Conservative, as many wealthy do. I think being open and allowing a *hash out* is a good thing. Congress does it ALL THE TIME. Don't we get upset with Congress???? When we don't have the ability to discuss things with them and their ideologies??? Gad Says.. "don't be afraid to take criticism if you can dish it out.". I agree. I admire Tom Bilye.. because He is honest and forthright enough to let the other person have their say on their opines.. without denying them.. and He's sincerely open about let's talk this through, discuss and analyze. Great Job Tom!
Bernie Sanders has nothing intellectual to offer the audience of Lex Friedman. We don't want to see it and it would probably get low views. Tom is a charlatan. Always following the crowd and what's hot. And way too late.
Love is definitely better than war... And it is definitely the opposite of love, that leads to wars... What a crazy reason to attack a deeply decent and (probably even smarter?) person like Lex Fridman?
If we want to build a nominally free society, do you not agree that we should stop imposing expectations on other people? YOUR freedom to swing your arms ends just at the tip of my nose. In a society that is free _for other people too_ , you do NOT get to treat other people however you want, free from consequences.
I think it can be that Lex is simply more optimistic and this is all about perspective. Personally. I myself am more like Gad and maybe one can view this as a brutal realist who can be seen sometimes as pesimistic, but I sure do enjoy peoples' perspectives who are more like Lex's and believe in this positivity. It's not wrong if it isn't an act.
It is a huge mistake to avoid all suffering. Yes of course you don’t create more suffering in your life, but if you avoid it as a principal, well, there’s huge downside to that. Suffering informs us.
I still don’t get why people go after Lex Fridman🤷🏻♀️. Yes, he is maybe too positive. That’s a reason to hate him?. Lex is good friends with Joe Rogan and Elon Musk. Elon is obviously becoming friends with Gad and Lex obviously don’t mind.
Sam Harris has reached his current stance not through careful thought but through emotion. His arguments have gaps so big you can drive a truck through them. He's also being intellectually dishonest about many things as a means to an end. That is not authentic, that is manipulative and avoiding points he doesn't like.
Most of these so called logical folks are beholden to specific interests most of which stem from primal biases. All you have to do is give them time and they expose themselves. Articulate? yes, but logical? come on men...not even Gad Saad.
You might be confused by this... But everyone's stances are reached through an emotional basis. Every stance you have is reached because you have a desired emotional outcome. You seek to influence other people with your stance to increase the likelihood of that desired emotional outcome. There is no argument you can make without an emotional foundation, because the very reason you're making that argument is emotional. For example, let's take the simplest argument: I would argue that 2+2=4 because if we can't agree on that, we are going to have lots of problems existing and interacting with each other in a society. If I desire to diminish those problems because it makes my life easier, that is an emotional desire. I seek to diminish the stress and that is my desired emotional outcome. That's why I argue that 2+2=4.... If I alone believe that 2+2=5, it wouldn't be much of a threat to you. You could probably ignore me and have no problems. But if I started convincing the masses that 2+2=5, you would get frustrated in short order and seek to change our minds... Now if we were to take more difficult problems, we would discover that the logic is not so simple to prove for us lowly humans.
I think Had doesn't really listen to people. An example of where Neil says I FEEL female, and Gad claim I AM female. There's a distinction in the English language between the 2. A very big distinction. To quote Ben Shapiro: facts don't care about your feelings. Gad seemed to confound the two to get a rise out of people.
Yes! Good observation. He's that lucky sly guest who had a chance to come on Joe's podcast, relentlessly kissed his a**, was never invited again for being a faux, so he copied the guy who made him "famous" in the first place. Shameless weasel move.
Not to defend NdGT but he didn't say his masculinity changes with his outfits if I'm not mistaken; he said rather that he may change his appearance in accordance with his daily mood and how feminine or masculine he "feels". So I don't know if the criticism is on point?
"TH-cam videos to check out... "Konstantin Kisin & Neil deGrasse Tyson CLASH Over Trans Debate" "The Real Reason Neil deGrasse Behaves That Way" "Jeff is Mad at Neil deGrasse Tyson's Transgender Theory !" "Bill Maher DESTROYS Woke NDT!" "Neil Degrasse Tyson Politely DESTROYED On His Woke Gender Ideology By Triggernometry In Live Debate"
He's a "public intellectual." How can that be since the larger public is by no means "intellectual." I get and support free speech as a right. What's often lost in that discussion is that responsibility comes with rights. That's why you can't yell, "Fire!" in a movie theater. However, if you are a public personality, igniting societal conflagrations through abject lies is totally permissible. We're fucked.
If someone yells fire in a movie theater, and people are smart enough to look around, smell the air, and ask the person where he is getting his information and why he believes it, then one very well has the right to yell fire in a movie theater, which will reveal he is an asshole, which is good information for people to know. That's why we allow ALL speech, not just some speech.
Matte is a fraud. He’s purposely keeping his followers “sick” by making them hyper focus on their pain or trauma so they grow dependent on buying his books and lectures and classes. He’s a huckster.
Don’t be so simple minded. Each have their roles. It really doesn’t have to be either or. Personally I prefer the Gabor more understanding the human condition way of viewing the world. But I also get what you are saying. But I see the value (even though I don’t resonate with it) of the Saad I’m a thriver kind of victim and get over yourself kind of thing. Personally I don’t trust the authenticity of Saad. It feels bitter and condescending. Not my flavour.
@@JG-mt3rp you display your ignorance well. 🙄. I’m sure Saad is soooo proud to claim you as part of his team this is sarcasm. I feel like I may need to spell this out for you). Go ahead…colour him more. Supporters like you do him no favours.
We want to control behaviour to some degree. Ideally, we would allow complete freedom of speech and control behaviour to some degree. In practice, speech and behaviour are not divorced. However, ideas should not be completely shut down. So, where and when matters. It is not simple.
You can press Shift and > speed up videos up to 2x. The cool thing is that it makes slow talker sound way more interesting. Normally I kept it on 1.5 or 1.75, but if you click on the cog wheel on the lower right side you can to more fine adjustments. Shift and < slows it down.
I agree about the vital importance of free speech, the necessity of it for maintaining a healthy democracy, and am in favour of even the most vile ideologies having their right to free speech protected, but I find that there's a recent tendency among certain public figures to label criticism as an attacks on their free speech. I'm not saying that's what's happening here, because there have been challenges to freedom of speech from both sides of the aisle. When, for instance, someone make a public anti-semitic remark and they're dog piled by the "woke mob" online, this isn't a threat to free speech, it's others exercising their free speech in response. Oftentimes it's public figures -- politicians, comedian, public intellectuals, etc. -- claiming their free speech is under attack. Think about it: these are people whose free speech has not only been protected, but _fostered_ by broadcasting it to an audience so much larger than the average that they've achieved celebrity status. However, now that social media has allowed the audience to respond en masse, they feel they're under attack because the social consequences of their speech is more accessible and apparent. Social media also enables people to say thing that can negatively affect their careers, though again, an employer's negative response to one's speech is not a violation of the freedom of speech. I also see a lot of people equating social media's terms of service with the suppression of free speech, which is bonkers to me. IF the government placed its thumb on the scales when it came to the enforcement of TOS, _that_ would be a violation of freedom of speech. If a private company enforces its rules that are much stricter than what you're legally allowed to scream from your rooftop, that doesn't violate the First Amendment. These companies function like publishing houses, but instead of books or magazines, they publish tweets, status updates, pictures, etc. It's not a violation of the First Amendment for a publisher to refuse to publish your _Mein Kampf II: The Reich Strikes Back_ and it isn't when Twitter refuses to publish your "Just asking [the Jewish] questions..." Do I think the government should be able to step in and prevent a publisher or social media site that would publish or post that stuff from doing so? Hell no! In Germany, for instance, it's illegal to display Swaztikas and there are a number restrictions related to Nazism that would be considered free speech in other countries. The goal is to prevent the glorification of Nazism and to prevent history from repeating itself. If any country has cause to restrict extremist speech in such a way, it's Germany, yet _I still disagree with it because I believe the harm done by restricting the freedom of speech in such a way does more damage than good._ What about de-platforming conspiracy theorists? While I don't think de-platforming is an affective or appropriate response to the likes of Alex Jones, TH-cam refusing to publish his stuff and the ability of affiliates and sponsors to drop controversial figures are not violations of the First Amendment, nor do I think they threaten the foundational principles behind it. He is well within his rights to release his videos on his own platform on his site, which he does! He still has a loyal fanbase willing to buy his shitty supplements. If you want to see what the suppression of the freedom of speech really looks like, look to Russia. People are being arrested for simply gathering in sufficient number, let alone protest. Aware they can't put down anti-war or ant-Putin slogans on picket signs, they started simply holding blank pieces of paper. Regardless, they were still arrested and given lengthy prison sentences or sent to the frontline. For years, journalists have been arrested, poisoned, those that display even the mildest opposition to Putin risk "jumping" out of hospital windows. Alexei Navalny, the opposition leader, was poisoned (which he survived), arrested on trumped up charges, sentenced to decades worth of prison time, and then murdered earlier this year. THAT is what the suppression of freedom of speech looks like. That doesn't mean I don't think we should be vigilant against the slow creep of government overreach to ensure we never get anywhere near that point, but it's frankly insulting to compare that to rich, butthurt comedians who can't take the negative response to their stale jokes because they went most of their careers without the immediate feedback of social media. If they're so concerned with threats to the First Amendment, maybe look to where the _government_ is actually taking steps to crack down on such things. Florida is literally banning books in classrooms and libraries, not just legislating free speech and expression, but taking the power away from parent and teachers ind termining what their children can and can't read.
I don't agree with Gad about Lex. Lex has conversations, not debates, and I don't think Gad understands how this fundamentally changes the framing. It might not be what Gad wants him to do but it makes sense that Lex does things the way he does. To my mind it's a non-issue and doesn't deserve derision.
Struck me as a bit pathetic how he somehow wanted lex to host him on his show as a response to his mockery of him, and somehow framing it as the proper way to do things. All while simultaneously stroking his own ego by boasting about sacrificing the opportunity to promote his book on Lex's podcast because he decided to keep it real (keeping in mind lex didn't invite him the first place).
Remember Lex is much younger and he has done very well for someone a generation younger than Gad or Tyson. Lex may have some growing up to do but that's to be expected.
That is a real issue with criticism. I whole-heartedly believe in the power of art, namely comedy and music, to come with a sort of punch behind critisizing language that makes the net effect of the criticism more effective. But when you have a marketing professor like Gad Saad perhaps greatly over estimating their ability to use the power of satire to improve a point, they may end up doing more harm than good. I'm a free speech absolutist, but it takes wisdom to realize that ad hominems and condescending language are not necessarily valuable just because they fall under the category of free speech. You may do more harm than good if you fail to read the room. The greatest comics and lyricists always fall back on empathy and humility, and that is a very important aspect to understand. Critisizing another person or a group of people in a manner that's actually productive is an art in itself.
Fridman: by far best podcast of all - noone else on that level... Mearsheimer, Rubin, Musk, Isaacson, Voss, Huberman, Altman - every single one outstanding. And if in doubt: better to be romatic than cynical!
Gad is tragically led by his massive ego… Kudos to him, though, to find a way to perceive his narcissism and logical fallacy laden arguments as happiness.
NDGT and Kisin talked past each other. Kisin said (biological) sex, and Tyson started in with 'gender', meaning gender identity or expression, and Kisin didn't catch it or stop him. You have to have the definitions clear. Gender USED TO mean biological sex until the social studies folks started studying sex roles.
![[Full Episode] MasterChef Junior Thailand มาสเตอร์เชฟ จูเนียร์ ประเทศไทย Season 3 Episode 1](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Qs5zdBqLn_8/mqdefault.jpg)
Freedom of religion, assembly, press, petition, speech. These rights are SO important they listed them FIRST.
u guys rock! @LackLusterMedia Thank you!
and freedom to BEAR arms, so that the other freedoms are protected.
@@user-ci2mn1oy3wI still haven’t gotten my BEAR arms as promised by the constitution, but I do luckily get to BARE arms. Maybe they meant I get to bare my arms to get my own pair of bear arms.
That is not the issue. They are the first ones to go under martial law, so there is a context under which they disappear in the blink of an eye and it is not only legal but considered good.
The problem is not thinking those rights are essencial, but under what context they should be suspended or where is the blurry line.
We have ignored the Khashoggi situation because of national interest, the same as Snowden or Assange, weapons of mass destruction in Irak, etc. ...
and there are clearly 2 camps for each topic and clearly one outcome
that violates all what we believe for a particular context that some believe to be more extremal than the others.
What he is saying is an oversimplification, because for him there are such contexts as well, he just have not thought of it that way
He makes it clear that what matters most to him are truth and freedom. A religion has nothing to do with either. On the other hand, if you live in a bubble of beliefs and pseudo-revealed truths, you're free to submit to them, as long as you don't impose your point of view on others as the way to go...
It is a stretch to call Neil Tyson a physicist.
He did research for only a brief time. He has a total of five 1st author papers, all from the 80s and 90s.
Were they exceptional papers? No. Harvard turned him down for post grad. University of Texas dissolved his doctoral committee and showed him the door.
For the past two or three decades he has been a pop science celebrity. And much of his material is wrong.
This.
😂😂😂😂 sounds a lot like Gad. Same clown utterly out of his depth.
He has basically been one step up from Bill Nye that child molester guy.
@@Upsideround Several books. A University professor. A very successful podcaster. Now, what is Gad out of his depth about? Or perhaps are you simply on the side of less freedom of speech?
Who cares, Neil's like Steve Irwin, passionate and entertaining! He's perfect for getting kids inspired by science.
If it is not true, don't say it. if it is not right, don't do it.. If you always tell the truth you will have nothing to remember
@SarahHuntsman78 the world we live in. You can't change everyone, you only can focus on change within yourself. It's an evil world, be with them or be yourself!
@SarahHuntsman888 I can't think of any career politicians that fit my definition of success.
The OP was talking about having to remember your lies though.
So if a politician lies yesterday, they have to remember their lie today so that they can defend what they said and continue the deceit. If they don't remember their lie from yesterday then they will be caught in the lie.
@SuperNatural-qu9lz It’s hard for modern westerners to admit that this demoralized individualism is failing and it’s being outcompeted by tribalists.
We use science to, in strictly humanist and utilitarian terms, create what we know to be good, create welfare and love as a lifestyle phenomenon that we can measure. That's our meager hoard of truth, a materialist reduction. As an approach, the project has clearly failed, but we are desperately trying to salvage what we can from it and a lot of our political and cultural malaise comes from refusing to accept that we can't use an algorithm or productivity numbers to overcome our self-awareness.
That’s the issue with the materialist algorithm idolizers who cling to the idea you will be allowed to remain unaffiliated and meaning will come from more naval gazing while slinking away.
Lol
@SarahHuntsman888That person didn't say politicians are unsuccessful. What are you talking about?
I thought I was the only one who felt the same about Lex, I completely agree with Gad, and I love Lex.
I agree. Lex is a fraud. Complete grifter who's never had a real job in his life.
I think people misinterpret Lex Fridman's positive approach. I personally thought it was stupid go a long time but the more that I've watched him the more that I have realize that it is a very calculated approach to really get the people he interviews comfortable to be speaking on their true views
🎯
Exactly
*Lex activates charm mode
No one is just putting their true views on Lex if they don’t want to, just because of his approach. He had the worst interview with the ceo of Pfizer. Complete fluff piece. Ridiculous and embarrassing as an interviewer. Completely let him off the hook.
Fridman often comes off as naive, gullible and lacking conviction (which itself is something a construction, but not put to any interesting end). His guests get to have their way with him. It’s what makes Rogan a bad interviewer as well. It’s one thing if your show is just about broing down and cracking jokes with your buds, it’s another thing to be sitting down with incredibly rich, powerful and influential people and simply providing them a platform to telegraph an image and a message without trying to break down these constructions and challenge what’s going on behind them. Which is what good journalists do. Fridman and Rogan aren’t interested in this. And so as if by default they end up as crass promoters, industry cheerleaders and PR puppets.
Tom Bilye is a fair and open minded Human being.. wish we had more like HIM. Thank you Tom for your educating the public and letting them figure it out by listening for themselves and hearing all these Guests positions/Views. Bravo! Knowledge is Power... and continuing to listen open mindedly is a positive approach to positive change. Awareness is key.
What does he taste like?
8:30: Even Neil dT should appreciate this one. He’s describing a modification to the Doppler Effect. It’s the Dopeler Effect: the tendency for stupid ideas to seem smarter the faster they come at you. 😂
Why would anyone have a problem with Lex
?- I like that Lex doesn't speak like some multi-level marketing recruiter. Tom knows all the cliches
The issue with Lex is that he will offer solutions to real world problems that are often quite naive and unhelpful.
In fact Tom is better at talking and debating, independently of being a business man.
Beta
One thing I love about Gad Saad is he's so practical but he also listens very well. What an amazing interview/Interviewer he is
You had me at "yes you have freedom of speech but..." I'm ready to listen to this one Tom!! Ty
It’s from an old podcast, you don’t have to wait.
Lex is the best of all of them because he does come from a good place and operates in good faith. He LISTENS. He asks good questions. He does fight back when necessary. More importantly, he has a history most people do not have and extensive experience with a darkness. He chose light. Do not fault him for this. There is room for EVERYONE.
I typically like Gad Saad but strongly disagree with him here.
I agree. He makes fun of the idea that if the Naz1$ had love, they wouldn't have done what they did. Yet, that's precisely correct.
@@MiloTimberlake After being raised by Germans, I can confirm this is true. No love or much of any emotion in our house aside from anger and abuse. Hurt people hurt people. Lex just points out the obvious.
lex cried when interviewing kanye because he couldnt get him to say what he wanted.
@@TheMoneyGPS I watched that entire interview and do not recall tears. He was visibly upset several times by Kanye's comments on jews, but he held his composure.
He was holding back his tears. He tried to use the interview as a way to discipline Kanye and it failed miserably.@@briarrose7016
"My North Star is human flousrishjing. I don't think you can get there without freedom of speech" - As comments are actively disappearing from this very comment section.
Wouldn’t yours be one of those if you were right?
TH-cam shenanigans, he doesn't have time or care to manually delete comments.
It's definitely this platform. It's getting worse by the day and you wouldn't believe how many words and topics are hit by the Ministry Of Wrong Think by now. It's especially brutal once you start commenting about politics, political science, the current cultural issues etc.
You need to realize that youtube does this.
The illustrious founding fathers were only thinking about their own class, they were hypocrites and knew it, they held slaves, sure free speech if you're a landowner, white and 21. The constitution needs to be understood in context, it is an obsolete document now.
I have never heard of Gad Saad before, but I absolutely love what he says in the last two minutes of this video.
He is amazing. He is the one who came out with this quote: " I have an obligation to objective truth ".
@@villaespesa1I already ordered his most recent book. I like reading what smart people have to say. :)
@TomTreutlein The parasitic brain? I think that was his last. Not sure.
The title of his book appears off. I would imagine it to be "The Parasitised Mind."
@@ianmiles2505 I think you're right 🤔
Neil DeGrasse Tyson has become a complete clown.
Too much talking from Tom. Wanted to hear more from Gad.
I loved NDT, but he's absolutely diving into realms he knows absolutely nothing about and just providing a lib answer with zero critical thinking whatsoever
If he stuck with trying to make people excited about science and trying to get more funding for NASA because of all the things the space race produced, I would still think he's awesome. He's lost his damn mind though.
why he is a big blow hard he got there being aa
I agree with most of this BUT
Neal Tyson is far more full of shi* than Lex, By orders of magnitude.
this
Agreed.
As far as Lex, some of it is anchoring yes, but some of it is also "I am not going to ruffle any bushes and play in the safe zone".... I like listening to his podcast from time to time, but I am also wondering that because he doesn't tackle a lot of blatant controversial subjects, as he plays the neutral card or safe card all the time, he probably has the "least" impact on anything changing at all.
that's the thing about people from academia very cold diplomatic attitude
There are plenty people who want to dig deep in adversarial/controversial subjects. Lex comes from the want to dig into the person and motivations show a different side , not the public facing one, not the polished one, but to discuss in how the person understands the world around them, not even what motivates them necessarily, but what informs their opinion. That is a truly rare form of interview at this time.
It amazes me how such smart people look at something clearly trying to be different and then forcibly compare it to what it never wanted to be.
And that's why he will be one of the few will remain in history. Because I history we have people who change and challenge the past, and the ones who documented the past. This two are very very important to coexist. Otherwise you'll have a distorted about the past as we often have.
Also, in our world is a lack of neutralised discussions. Which usually is boring and is not making any sense. But because we don't have any today, we feel the need of it and lex is very popular by doing it. You literally can't find anywhere else in this world what Lex is offering.
Lex is awesome. Tiny little ego, unlike this fella.
It is so refreshing to have Lex on TH-cam, with sooooo many fractured egos here, clamouring for attention.
Yes. Lex has an amazing intellect and is a great listener.
"tiny little ego" is an illusion believed by naive people
Yeah buddy boys…so true
1. He didn't have a "tiny little ego" when Kanye started talking about jews.
2. What's the appeal of that guy? His boring, robotic, monotone voice? His silly, childish, naive worldview? Or maybe it's his dashing and glowing charisma? Maybe it's his humor?
@@MisterCovek He's a sexy Russian. Back off, he's mine. 🤣
"... no more depth, no more nuance..."
Exactly, excellent. Subscribed! Depth of thought is being eliminated systemically, and we need to correct that.
I swear this channel has more ads than any other.
I didn't see a single ad.
TH-cam Premium
It's annoying when they have sponsors that they mention, and still enable ads, even though this guy is already filthy rich. 🙄
YT premium = no ads
Only Aud$16/month here
Have just come across this channel in recommended videos. Does the host always speak in such a choppy manner?
Great interview and guest! Love these kinds of foundational conversations. Your personal coherency of thought and approach ….does promote happiness!
I’m an Independent Latino! Thank you Tom!! Lex Friedman is KING 👑 !!! Why Lex is doing Super well is because he is an articulate and humble human being.
Don’t know if he’s King. That’s Jesus
King simp but he can play some pink floyd
@@HankSemoreButzNope he isn't ,he's just Jesus.
I'm a independent Latino too lol.
@@gregvaldez1269 agreed. Otherwise known as The Messiah 😉
This would be a better show if the host let the guest talk. I used FF a lot to get through this.
Gad’s most viewed videos are always about Sam Harris. They get more views than any long form interviews of any guests. He has a good reason to keep doing them in perpetuity $$$$
They happen to be friends. Show me your evidence.
You realize millions of views are worth a few hundred bucks 😂 you don’t know the rate they get paid, this is obviously wrong
Dude is doing you tube as a hobby. He has an actual life and career you know
"I have a non fractured personhood " and a MASSIVELY ARROGANT EGO.
He may benefit from having a conversation with Prof Sam Vaknin, author of Malignant Self-Love, Narcissism Revisited.
why does him saying that about himself make him arrogant? Can one not speak about themself in a sincere and positive way without being branded as arrogant? Is it possible that Gad's confidence touches on the part of you that wishes to say something similar but won't allow it?
It's a nice way to put it. You can have a non fractured personhood if you follow the truth. But with the genuine humble you never have it or know it.
🎯
@@johnnytass2111 That's complete nonsense. He's obviously not an exemplar of narcissism.
Disagree. Stop trying to make Lex into someone else.
We know what we are consuming when we click Lex.
freedom is conditioned by truth and justice
>> freedom is conditioned by truth and justice
In addition to being an exceptional thinker, Gad Saad is also an exceptional human being.
I appreciate this clip very much! Thank you both. Much Love.
00:00 🌟 Having a North Star principle, like human flourishing, guides actions towards improving the well-being of others.
01:18 💬 Freedom of speech is crucial for human flourishing and must be defended.
03:37 🤔 Authenticity in grappling with complex issues, even if conclusions may be disagreed upon, fosters intellectual growth.
06:14 📚 Variety, including intellectual diversity, is essential for personal growth and happiness.
08:02 🔄 Intellectual humility is vital, welcoming challenges and diverse perspectives for growth.
10:56 🔍 Scrutinizing and debating ideas fosters antifragility, strengthening one's position through examination and critique.
i agree we are well past the "think positive" phase. thats like grade school of the new collective consciousness. kindergarten
But we are still labeling? Our egos are grasping for levels of achievement while claiming liberation?
Speak for yourself. If you pay very close attention to your words, you will likely realize just how many generalizations you make. Those generalizations are the enemy of nuance, and nuance is the path to understanding. Perception is everything. Watch media all-day and you may completely fail to grasp any sense of progress being made by humanity and that pessimism will control your behaviors. If morale is low in an individual, that individual will ultimately be making decisions based on fear. If morale is high, that individual will try to make the world a better place.
@@limitisillusion7 this comment was too confrontational. We must speak to them like they are drunk. It technically is an 'us' conversation anyway. We are all one
@@hobgoblinhollow4966 The individuals make up the whole, but diversity is still a good thing. But diversity is not division. Lack of acceptance of diversity is division. If we accept each other's individuality, we effectively prioritize our human identity while celebrating our individuality. It really comes down to that: prioritize your human identity above any other subgroup and we'll have world peace. It will also make us a lot better at solving problems if we choose a human vs environment perspective, as opposed to human vs human.
To understand how you actions effect yourself _through_ others is the epitome of wisdom in my mind. The golden rule is a good start, but it falls short when it comes to digging us out of the vicious cycles of low morale that we fall into as a species. Low morale means reckless behavior. If you don't care about yourself, the golden rule doesn't work very well and you can justify anything.
This was so good and spot on. More people need to hear this thought process…or really any thought process.
I used to love this channel, now it’s totally gone downhill
Everything starts moderate and works to the extreme to maintain relevancy
How is this extreme?
Eh I like Lex, I don’t need him to solve the worlds issues. He’s representing a truth which is easily overlooked and I don’t think he’s being dishonest.
Tom just because you have someone on your show doesn’t mean you KNOW THEM. You have spent time associating with them is all.
2:30 the problem with Bret Kavenaugh, in fact any candidate for such office as a Supreme Court, is that there is a big difference between a criminal court hearing and a Supreme Court nomination hearing. Just because someone wouldn't be found guilty in a criminal court (high standards) doesn't mean they should automatically be found worthy by Congress to be a Justice or any high official. In other words, losing a nomination vote in the Congress doesn't mean that you are a guilty criminal, it just means that you are not a good enough nominee in eyes of the elected representatives.
Every charge against Kavenaugh was proven to be a lie. Try again soy boy.
Oh this should be good. Get your popcorn ready. 🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿
Love and truth: that is christianity. You cannot put truth below love and compassion as everything fall appart, but you cannot act without love as everything also crumble.
So sometime you have to be harsh to push for truth even when it's unconfortable.
My second time watching your podcast. Your dialog is very interesting. You ask very good questions. Subscribed and shared. Thx!
Is it all the neurotypicals judging Lex here 😂
This is the stuff!
Points for solid principles and yes, authenticity. I actually disagree with just about everything said beyond that, but I can at least get through it enough to begin to understand.
The bar for conversation may be on the floor these days, but a win is a win, so thanks for sharing, guys.
One thing intellectual titans such as Gad have a hard time wrapping their head around is the fact that some peoples derision for you as an individual might outweigh their exigency to discuss the weather, let alone a particular topic. They are overwhelmingly driven by their disputatiousness and find no room for interpersonal abstractions.
Me.
LOVE the Gadfather and he's 100% right on Lex and Tyson.
Why? Stop worshiping charlatans.
I don't know. Always be wary of those that pump up their own tyre, whilst deflating others in the same breath.
Most of these talking heads lose credibility when they resort to doing this......and then the Orange Himler. What dos that mean?
Lex is a plant. A boring, possibly autistic, uncharismatic nerd with no sense of humor comes out of nowhere and has one of the biggest podcasts in the world, hosting some of the most popular people in the world....?
The bubble is bursting and this is just the beginning.
@@Harker777 Orange Himmler was some left/Neocon's talking points about Trump. Comparing him to Himmler in effect. It was like i am for the freedom of speech but not when it came to suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story as that would have benefitted the orange Himmler. Meaning Trump. That is what some people were saying in some conservative but anti Trump spaces. Gaad is saying he rejects that premise and made him think differently about the people/institutions that would proclaim that they were ambassadors for freedom of speech...Except...
Vow 🤗🤗🤗i am listening to your video first time, because i don't get time to watch 😅i always check the time first 😎👍
I think Gad Saad has a point... Lex does not have Bernie Sanders on his show.. and He leans Conservative, as many wealthy do. I think being open and allowing a *hash out* is a good thing. Congress does it ALL THE TIME. Don't we get upset with Congress???? When we don't have the ability to discuss things with them and their ideologies??? Gad Says.. "don't be afraid to take criticism if you can dish it out.". I agree. I admire Tom Bilye.. because He is honest and forthright enough to let the other person have their say on their opines.. without denying them.. and He's sincerely open about let's talk this through, discuss and analyze. Great Job Tom!
Bernie Sanders has nothing intellectual to offer the audience of Lex Friedman. We don't want to see it and it would probably get low views.
Tom is a charlatan. Always following the crowd and what's hot. And way too late.
There are no problematic people, only old ideas that play their role in solutions.
Love is definitely better than war... And it is definitely the opposite of love, that leads to wars... What a crazy reason to attack a deeply decent and (probably even smarter?) person like Lex Fridman?
I appreciate Tom's humility in this
Neil deGrasse is not an intellectual. I wish people would stop saying that.
I often wonder why Tom Biley does not interview Tom Bilueu, would love to hear his opinion.
Great clip!!
Oh Lord that bloody baseball cap 😂
In combination with smart glasses is so cringe…. Followed by “Anchor my life” phrase….
What? They are intelligent and rational people? Is that the problem? Yeah..
If we want to build a nominally free society, do you not agree that we should stop imposing expectations on other people? YOUR freedom to swing your arms ends just at the tip of my nose. In a society that is free _for other people too_ , you do NOT get to treat other people however you want, free from consequences.
I think it can be that Lex is simply more optimistic and this is all about perspective. Personally. I myself am more like Gad and maybe one can view this as a brutal realist who can be seen sometimes as pesimistic, but I sure do enjoy peoples' perspectives who are more like Lex's and believe in this positivity. It's not wrong if it isn't an act.
It is a huge mistake to avoid all suffering. Yes of course you don’t create more suffering in your life, but if you avoid it as a principal, well, there’s huge downside to that. Suffering informs us.
Wow! A man with integrity left in America!😊
Remember the USS Liberty an all the brave men who died that day.
Bitcoin is sound money for sovereign individuals
If you are attacking the position, not the person, why target the person ? Brilliant.
A person who holds up a banner for a position is going to be critiqued.
Do you lack a backbone and common sense?
Reasons to censor:
- You're afraid of truth.
- You want to lie.
I still don’t get why people go after Lex Fridman🤷🏻♀️. Yes, he is maybe too positive. That’s a reason to hate him?. Lex is good friends with Joe Rogan and Elon Musk. Elon is obviously becoming friends with Gad and Lex obviously don’t mind.
Wait. Are they saying Lex Friedman is Against free speech?
Sam Harris has reached his current stance not through careful thought but through emotion. His arguments have gaps so big you can drive a truck through them. He's also being intellectually dishonest about many things as a means to an end. That is not authentic, that is manipulative and avoiding points he doesn't like.
The only explanation I can think of is that he is beholden to interests that require him to take those positions. He's too intelligent to be so blind
What's his current stance?
Most of these so called logical folks are beholden to specific interests most of which stem from primal biases. All you have to do is give them time and they expose themselves. Articulate? yes, but logical? come on men...not even Gad Saad.
You must be a damn fool if that is your conclusion
You might be confused by this... But everyone's stances are reached through an emotional basis. Every stance you have is reached because you have a desired emotional outcome. You seek to influence other people with your stance to increase the likelihood of that desired emotional outcome. There is no argument you can make without an emotional foundation, because the very reason you're making that argument is emotional.
For example, let's take the simplest argument: I would argue that 2+2=4 because if we can't agree on that, we are going to have lots of problems existing and interacting with each other in a society. If I desire to diminish those problems because it makes my life easier, that is an emotional desire. I seek to diminish the stress and that is my desired emotional outcome. That's why I argue that 2+2=4.... If I alone believe that 2+2=5, it wouldn't be much of a threat to you. You could probably ignore me and have no problems. But if I started convincing the masses that 2+2=5, you would get frustrated in short order and seek to change our minds... Now if we were to take more difficult problems, we would discover that the logic is not so simple to prove for us lowly humans.
I think it's great that these TH-cam guys r critical of each other as long as they respond well 2 tha criticism,makes them sharper
We need more insightful social analysis like Gad Saad !
I think Had doesn't really listen to people. An example of where Neil says I FEEL female, and Gad claim I AM female. There's a distinction in the English language between the 2. A very big distinction. To quote Ben Shapiro: facts don't care about your feelings.
Gad seemed to confound the two to get a rise out of people.
Awesome
The utterly nightmarish possibility that he’ll be choking you out while asking “what *is* love?”
I see Neil Tyson next week, can’t wait to see what he says
The fact that I cannot name "Lex Fridman" directly says alot.
Lex, being Lex, is now likely going to invite him on his show.
Did this guy take over all of Joe Rogan's interesting guests?
Yes! Good observation. He's that lucky sly guest who had a chance to come on Joe's podcast, relentlessly kissed his a**, was never invited again for being a faux, so he copied the guy who made him "famous" in the first place. Shameless weasel move.
It becomes clear just how many charlatans there are. Tom is no exception
Not to defend NdGT but he didn't say his masculinity changes with his outfits if I'm not mistaken; he said rather that he may change his appearance in accordance with his daily mood and how feminine or masculine he "feels". So I don't know if the criticism is on point?
"TH-cam videos to check out...
"Konstantin Kisin & Neil deGrasse Tyson CLASH Over Trans Debate"
"The Real Reason Neil deGrasse Behaves That Way"
"Jeff is Mad at Neil deGrasse Tyson's Transgender Theory !"
"Bill Maher DESTROYS Woke NDT!"
"Neil Degrasse Tyson Politely DESTROYED On His Woke Gender Ideology By Triggernometry In Live Debate"
He's right about Lex. He is vacuous.
Good stuff 🎉
He's a "public intellectual." How can that be since the larger public is by no means "intellectual." I get and support free speech as a right. What's often lost in that discussion is that responsibility comes with rights. That's why you can't yell, "Fire!" in a movie theater. However, if you are a public personality, igniting societal conflagrations through abject lies is totally permissible. We're fucked.
If someone yells fire in a movie theater, and people are smart enough to look around, smell the air, and ask the person where he is getting his information and why he believes it, then one very well has the right to yell fire in a movie theater, which will reveal he is an asshole, which is good information for people to know. That's why we allow ALL speech, not just some speech.
Saad is awesome. He's the antidote to that foul kapo Gabor Mate
Matte is a fraud. He’s purposely keeping his followers “sick” by making them hyper focus on their pain or trauma so they grow dependent on buying his books and lectures and classes. He’s a huckster.
Don’t be so simple minded. Each have their roles. It really doesn’t have to be either or. Personally I prefer the Gabor more understanding the human condition way of viewing the world. But I also get what you are saying. But I see the value (even though I don’t resonate with it) of the Saad I’m a thriver kind of victim and get over yourself kind of thing. Personally I don’t trust the authenticity of Saad. It feels bitter and condescending. Not my flavour.
@@cryptosunflower840 ^ The Genz trash has entered the chat 😅
@@JG-mt3rp you display your ignorance well. 🙄. I’m sure Saad is soooo proud to claim you as part of his team this is sarcasm. I feel like I may need to spell this out for you). Go ahead…colour him more. Supporters like you do him no favours.
@@cryptosunflower840A phenomenon which is perhaps tricky for some to pick up on
Wow! He got fit! Good for him!!!
Hey, Gad-Father looks great, what are you doing Mr (Not-so) Saad?
Gad is simply a hater. Lex is a beautiful human.
We want to control behaviour to some degree. Ideally, we would allow complete freedom of speech and control behaviour to some degree. In practice, speech and behaviour are not divorced. However, ideas should not be completely shut down. So, where and when matters. It is not simple.
need more clips. 3 hour videos scare me
You can press Shift and > speed up videos up to 2x. The cool thing is that it makes slow talker sound way more interesting. Normally I kept it on 1.5 or 1.75, but if you click on the cog wheel on the lower right side you can to more fine adjustments. Shift and < slows it down.
@@Noise-Conductor but that's still 1.5-2 hours. I normal watch everything at 2x
Lex should invite Saad on to discuss this like an adult
I agree about the vital importance of free speech, the necessity of it for maintaining a healthy democracy, and am in favour of even the most vile ideologies having their right to free speech protected, but I find that there's a recent tendency among certain public figures to label criticism as an attacks on their free speech. I'm not saying that's what's happening here, because there have been challenges to freedom of speech from both sides of the aisle. When, for instance, someone make a public anti-semitic remark and they're dog piled by the "woke mob" online, this isn't a threat to free speech, it's others exercising their free speech in response. Oftentimes it's public figures -- politicians, comedian, public intellectuals, etc. -- claiming their free speech is under attack. Think about it: these are people whose free speech has not only been protected, but _fostered_ by broadcasting it to an audience so much larger than the average that they've achieved celebrity status. However, now that social media has allowed the audience to respond en masse, they feel they're under attack because the social consequences of their speech is more accessible and apparent. Social media also enables people to say thing that can negatively affect their careers, though again, an employer's negative response to one's speech is not a violation of the freedom of speech.
I also see a lot of people equating social media's terms of service with the suppression of free speech, which is bonkers to me. IF the government placed its thumb on the scales when it came to the enforcement of TOS, _that_ would be a violation of freedom of speech. If a private company enforces its rules that are much stricter than what you're legally allowed to scream from your rooftop, that doesn't violate the First Amendment. These companies function like publishing houses, but instead of books or magazines, they publish tweets, status updates, pictures, etc. It's not a violation of the First Amendment for a publisher to refuse to publish your _Mein Kampf II: The Reich Strikes Back_ and it isn't when Twitter refuses to publish your "Just asking [the Jewish] questions..." Do I think the government should be able to step in and prevent a publisher or social media site that would publish or post that stuff from doing so? Hell no! In Germany, for instance, it's illegal to display Swaztikas and there are a number restrictions related to Nazism that would be considered free speech in other countries. The goal is to prevent the glorification of Nazism and to prevent history from repeating itself. If any country has cause to restrict extremist speech in such a way, it's Germany, yet _I still disagree with it because I believe the harm done by restricting the freedom of speech in such a way does more damage than good._ What about de-platforming conspiracy theorists? While I don't think de-platforming is an affective or appropriate response to the likes of Alex Jones, TH-cam refusing to publish his stuff and the ability of affiliates and sponsors to drop controversial figures are not violations of the First Amendment, nor do I think they threaten the foundational principles behind it. He is well within his rights to release his videos on his own platform on his site, which he does! He still has a loyal fanbase willing to buy his shitty supplements.
If you want to see what the suppression of the freedom of speech really looks like, look to Russia. People are being arrested for simply gathering in sufficient number, let alone protest. Aware they can't put down anti-war or ant-Putin slogans on picket signs, they started simply holding blank pieces of paper. Regardless, they were still arrested and given lengthy prison sentences or sent to the frontline. For years, journalists have been arrested, poisoned, those that display even the mildest opposition to Putin risk "jumping" out of hospital windows. Alexei Navalny, the opposition leader, was poisoned (which he survived), arrested on trumped up charges, sentenced to decades worth of prison time, and then murdered earlier this year. THAT is what the suppression of freedom of speech looks like. That doesn't mean I don't think we should be vigilant against the slow creep of government overreach to ensure we never get anywhere near that point, but it's frankly insulting to compare that to rich, butthurt comedians who can't take the negative response to their stale jokes because they went most of their careers without the immediate feedback of social media. If they're so concerned with threats to the First Amendment, maybe look to where the _government_ is actually taking steps to crack down on such things. Florida is literally banning books in classrooms and libraries, not just legislating free speech and expression, but taking the power away from parent and teachers ind termining what their children can and can't read.
I don't agree with Gad about Lex. Lex has conversations, not debates, and I don't think Gad understands how this fundamentally changes the framing. It might not be what Gad wants him to do but it makes sense that Lex does things the way he does. To my mind it's a non-issue and doesn't deserve derision.
To my mind LF is a fence-sitting snooze fest
@@modern.performer Well yeah, that's kind of the point and the reason he gets some of his guests.
They don't want you on their shows not because they disagree with you. They don't want you on their shows because they have standards to uphold.
Struck me as a bit pathetic how he somehow wanted lex to host him on his show as a response to his mockery of him, and somehow framing it as the proper way to do things. All while simultaneously stroking his own ego by boasting about sacrificing the opportunity to promote his book on Lex's podcast because he decided to keep it real (keeping in mind lex didn't invite him the first place).
This dude has the hivemind virus
He's everything that's wrong with society. Good some of us can notice.
Who? I hope you don't mean Gad. He literally wrote the book on the woke mind virus.
@resolution1 who is?
Remember Lex is much younger and he has done very well for someone a generation younger than Gad or Tyson. Lex may have some growing up to do but that's to be expected.
Gad Saad is no Dave Chappelle. Saad should drop the satiric vitriol among his peers.
The problem with satire online is it often doesn’t come across as satire, like it would in person.
The bigot thinks he's a funny intellectual. Cringe.
That is a real issue with criticism. I whole-heartedly believe in the power of art, namely comedy and music, to come with a sort of punch behind critisizing language that makes the net effect of the criticism more effective. But when you have a marketing professor like Gad Saad perhaps greatly over estimating their ability to use the power of satire to improve a point, they may end up doing more harm than good.
I'm a free speech absolutist, but it takes wisdom to realize that ad hominems and condescending language are not necessarily valuable just because they fall under the category of free speech. You may do more harm than good if you fail to read the room. The greatest comics and lyricists always fall back on empathy and humility, and that is a very important aspect to understand. Critisizing another person or a group of people in a manner that's actually productive is an art in itself.
Why are people time-stamping a 12 minute video???
The blue light on Gad really brings out his testicular fortitude 💙
This guy is an intellectual lightweight.
Just because it's your show it doesn't mean you get to speak more than the guest.
Fridman: by far best podcast of all - noone else on that level... Mearsheimer, Rubin, Musk, Isaacson, Voss, Huberman, Altman - every single one outstanding. And if in doubt: better to be romatic than cynical!
Or a lot of low brow people love him.
Gad is tragically led by his massive ego… Kudos to him, though, to find a way to perceive his narcissism and logical fallacy laden arguments as happiness.
🎯
Nonsense.
Oh nooo... Did he huwt your wittle wex fweedman? Did he make a boo boo?
Having conviction doesn't mean having an ego. Learn the difference.
Why doesn’t the down vote button work?
NDGT and Kisin talked past each other. Kisin said (biological) sex, and Tyson started in with 'gender', meaning gender identity or expression, and Kisin didn't catch it or stop him. You have to have the definitions clear. Gender USED TO mean biological sex until the social studies folks started studying sex roles.