@@laserbeak3551 true that, Tyson has speed and power those would be the key elements tyson would need to defeat foreman, might not be a knockout but a split decision, Foreman would have to rely on his punching power to slow tyson down, but tyson would be too quick for Foreman.
@@laserbeak3551 Prime Foreman indeed, but Mike Tyson 1986 against George Foreman 1987 comeback, I think tyson would out box foreman. I'll admit Foreman had great punching power, Tyson threw fast combinations with lots of velocity and from better angles. Foreman didnt even need to be very accurate, just land something and they are hurt. Tyson and Foreman had different kinds of power Tyson had explosive power, Foreman had thudding power.
This fight didnt happen for one reason and one reason only-Tyson was scared to death of Foreman. Didn't want to get anywhere near him, even as an old man. When he wayoung he watched the Frazier/Foreman fight over and over and watched those two destroy each other and saw how Foreman handled Frazier, who size-eise and power-wise would be close to Tyson. And he saw Foreman just absorb punishment. He wanted nothing to do with the monster that was George Foreman.
Old George had a cast-iron head and was better at defense. I think it would have gone the full 12 win by decision for Tyson. However, both were good ko artists. I think Foreman had more power. Look his ko to regain the title. It was a short punch.
The most unbelievably UNREALISTIC aspect of the video is Foreman taking steps back. Literally never took a single step back in any fight footage that exists of him (he said Liston was the only man to back him up consistently when George served as his sparring partner)
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed george height is advantage pushes means he dominates his power was to much uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast swammers lose fast dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds george said for dwight he said he had trouble hittin him even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes you say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George but when yall say the odd blind quote of mike was like joe even though they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George u didnt have nothin for the debunk of my breakdown cause it is none so u went back to the same idiotic quotes u lost George would lose and it's no way to say he wouldnt the so called advantages was exposed by dwight and Tom like I proved dumb follower another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick dwight style like joe but better defense ali and jim fast punchers and defense frank real slow and almost as George smith slow and strong So no that quote of bad for mike doesn't make sense or has it ever the bad match is for Geroge cus never said u follower just cause u read doesnt make it true that quote been exposed years ago so why your using it makes no sense so why did you even if he did a person saying something cant make a person win or lose a match so its stupid to say what a person said so yea im right cause this is all from video so watch the matches like i said
@richym3899 the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed george height is advantage pushes means he dominates his power was to much uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast swammers lose fast dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds george said for dwight he said he had trouble hittin him even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes you say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George but when yall say the odd blind quote of mike was like joe even though they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George u didnt have nothin for the debunk of my breakdown cause it is none so u went back to the same idiotic quotes u lost George would lose and it's no way to say he wouldnt the so called advantages was exposed by dwight and Tom like I proved dumb follower another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick dwight style like joe but better defense ali and jim fast punchers and defense frank real slow and almost as George smith slow and strong So no that quote of bad for mike doesn't make sense or has it ever the bad match is for Geroge cus never said u follower just cause u read doesnt make it true that quote been exposed years ago so why your using it makes no sense so why did you even if he did a person saying something cant make a person win or lose a match so its stupid to say what a person said so yea im right cause this is all from video so watch the matches like i said
That's a nice fantasy Mike Tyson couldn't handle George Foreman in his prime
George Foreman wouldn't be able to take Prime Mike Tyson's punches.
Tyson the better boxer, Foreman the tougher man
@@laserbeak3551 true that, Tyson has speed and power those would be the key elements tyson would need to defeat foreman, might not be a knockout but a split decision, Foreman would have to rely on his punching power to slow tyson down, but tyson would be too quick for Foreman.
@@Rockabillyman26 i go for the tougher man. Only Ali could stop Foreman being clever but took a tremendous beating, dont think Tyson could handle that
@@laserbeak3551 Prime Foreman indeed, but Mike Tyson 1986 against George Foreman 1987 comeback, I think tyson would out box foreman. I'll admit Foreman had great punching power, Tyson threw fast combinations with lots of velocity and from better angles. Foreman didnt even need to be very accurate, just land something and they are hurt. Tyson and Foreman had different kinds of power Tyson had explosive power, Foreman had thudding power.
And to think that this almost became a reality back in 1994 or 1995.
I knew this wouldn't go the distance
This fight didnt happen for one reason and one reason only-Tyson was scared to death of Foreman. Didn't want to get anywhere near him, even as an old man. When he wayoung he watched the Frazier/Foreman fight over and over and watched those two destroy each other and saw how Foreman handled Frazier, who size-eise and power-wise would be close to Tyson. And he saw Foreman just absorb punishment. He wanted nothing to do with the monster that was George Foreman.
Old George had a cast-iron head and was better at defense. I think it would have gone the full 12 win by decision for Tyson. However, both were good ko artists. I think Foreman had more power. Look his ko to regain the title. It was a short punch.
It's unreal, Foreman will kill Tyson
The most unbelievably UNREALISTIC aspect of the video is Foreman taking steps back. Literally never took a single step back in any fight footage that exists of him (he said Liston was the only man to back him up consistently when George served as his sparring partner)
@@richym3899 looney
@@richym3899 no video proof of that follower so stop
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes you say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the odd blind quote of mike was like joe even though they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
u didnt have nothin for the debunk of my breakdown cause it is none so u went back to the same idiotic quotes u lost George would lose and it's no way to say he wouldnt the so called advantages was exposed by dwight and Tom like I proved dumb follower
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
So no that quote of bad for mike doesn't make sense or has it ever the bad match is for Geroge
cus never said u follower just cause u read doesnt make it true that quote been exposed years ago so why your using it makes no sense so why did you even if he did a person saying something cant make a person win or lose a match so its stupid to say what a person said
so yea im right cause this is all from video so watch the matches like i said
@richym3899 the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes you say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the odd blind quote of mike was like joe even though they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
u didnt have nothin for the debunk of my breakdown cause it is none so u went back to the same idiotic quotes u lost George would lose and it's no way to say he wouldnt the so called advantages was exposed by dwight and Tom like I proved dumb follower
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
So no that quote of bad for mike doesn't make sense or has it ever the bad match is for Geroge
cus never said u follower just cause u read doesnt make it true that quote been exposed years ago so why your using it makes no sense so why did you even if he did a person saying something cant make a person win or lose a match so its stupid to say what a person said
so yea im right cause this is all from video so watch the matches like i said
Nice video I recently started a walkthrough on this game mode on my channel would you check it out