SpaceX Starship IFT-1 Launch - NASA WB-57 Cam 4

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ค. 2023
  • SpaceX Starship IFT-1 Launch - NASA WB-57 Cam 4
    #SpaceX #Starship #NASA
    Other Camera Angle (Cam 0): • SpaceX Starship IFT-1 ...
    TLP Network via a NASA FOIA has acquired 2 of 5 videos recored by NASA WB-57 during the Starship IFT-1 flight. The other 3 cameras from NASA WB-57 have been classified.
    Thank you to NASA HQ for their support in releasing this footage to TLP Network.
    -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
    Want to support what I do?
    Consider becoming a TLP Member on Patreon or TH-cam!
    / thelaunchpad
    / thelaunchpad
    -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
    CONNECT WITH US:
    Discord - / discord
    Twitter - / tlpn_official
    Shop - www.thelaunchpad.store
    -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
    VIDEO SOURCES:
    NASA via FOIA Request
    -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
    GIVEAWAY RULES:
    No Purchase Necessary. Purchase/donation does not enhance chance of winning. Void where prohibited or restricted by law. Valid only during the live broadcast.
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 83

  • @TCV12
    @TCV12 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Play at 2x for real time

  • @yes_head
    @yes_head 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Longest death throes of a rocket ever.

  • @tsr207
    @tsr207 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Exceptional footage- The Launch Pad always delivers for its viewers - good to see the WB-57 (the Canberra in RAF service) still working hard !

  • @ThompPL1
    @ThompPL1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for getting the whole thing raw onto YT unedited and unspoiled ! 👍

  • @MachoShacho
    @MachoShacho 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    These views really show how crazy Starship was spinning and how it held up during all of it!

    • @Shattered65
      @Shattered65 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      And how the FTS failed to terminate the flight.

    • @clevergirl4457
      @clevergirl4457 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Shattered65 i mean it eventually did, but, yeah biggest failure was it not being instantaneous.

    • @NealeUpstone
      @NealeUpstone 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Watching the footage, it struck me how much of what was intended to be tested actually got tested. Admittedly the re-entry burn will be fewer engines and potentially in thicker air, but it certainly flew somewhat tail first a fair bit. And the transverse loads and bending that the ship and booster will have had was pretty good too.

    • @brianv1988
      @brianv1988 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They waited 2 the very last minute to gather as much information and data that has been reported by Elan on why they took longer

    • @clevergirl4457
      @clevergirl4457 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@brianv1988 that's pretty sus tho, the point of an FTS is to instantly destroy an out-of-controlled spacecraft. Besides SpaceX has already changed the FTS for starship and have doen ground tests of a more powerful system for detonation.

  • @echovictorsix
    @echovictorsix 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Congrats on the exclusive Zack! TLP for the win! Amazing videos!

    • @TheLaunchPad
      @TheLaunchPad  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Appreciate it! Been team effort working with NASA since day of launch.

  • @mattcolver1
    @mattcolver1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    It's amazing how many holes they blew into it and it held together just venting out.

    • @doresearchstopwhining
      @doresearchstopwhining 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Holes where? I thought the debris from the pad only impacted the engines? Not holes in the tanks or anything right?

    • @aneurinhullah8687
      @aneurinhullah8687 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ⁠@@doresearchstopwhiningThe FTS is supposed to blow holes in the tank, so the vehicle will be fully destroyed. Liquid fuel rockets will usually “unzip” the tank with explosives, depending on the type of fuel. SpaceX didn’t have an FTS that could destroy the vehicle quickly, leading to the tumbling rocket leaking fuel, and remaining intact for a concerning amount of time.

    • @mattcolver1
      @mattcolver1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@doresearchstopwhining Range safety blew holes in the tanks to end the mission and destroy the vehicle. Those holes just spewed fuel and oxidizer for a long time before it blew.

    • @brianv1988
      @brianv1988 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It was reported that they waited longer to gather more data before range safety gave the order to blow it

    • @doresearchstopwhining
      @doresearchstopwhining 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mattcolver1 Ahh interesting thanks. So self destruct sequence took a while as they attempted to drain the tanks I guess right? Do you know how long?

  • @Deathon2legs2002
    @Deathon2legs2002 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That was one heck of a ride. Good first try for Starship!!!

  • @derelictCHEESEBURGER
    @derelictCHEESEBURGER 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow!!! Easily the best footage, the way it spins is crazy!!

  • @brianv1988
    @brianv1988 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Amazing footage Great Piece Of History in this video and I am glad to be alive for it

    • @TheLaunchPad
      @TheLaunchPad  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Same here!

  • @dagger4146
    @dagger4146 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Metallic confetti !

  • @allanrose3661
    @allanrose3661 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Was hoping for more in focus.

  • @NominalOrbit
    @NominalOrbit 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You able to PM the file? I’d like to put my editing skills to work and get a grasp of the perspective of where exactly in the air this was shot from.

  • @armandomercado2248
    @armandomercado2248 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rocket under performed during ascent, lost directional control, flight termination system was inadequate, multiple engine explosions and fires eventually caused enough damage to break up the rocket. Good test. A lot was learned and the launch pad destruction was icing on the cake.

  • @NotTomB
    @NotTomB 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    B9 S25 up next!

  • @terrysansom7071
    @terrysansom7071 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm kinda surprised that they try stabilize it with the booster glide paddle like they do on recovery of falcon booster??

  • @cooperfoster2613
    @cooperfoster2613 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Jeez

  • @doresearchstopwhining
    @doresearchstopwhining 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So wild how long it went sideways at thousands of miles per hour.... This footage is insane.

  • @kennethfoster1054
    @kennethfoster1054 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Spectacular another spectacular space X starship extravaganza!🚀💥

  • @casualology.
    @casualology. 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    stunning.

    • @TheLaunchPad
      @TheLaunchPad  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It really is!

  • @invertedjoy9731
    @invertedjoy9731 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    yeah this thing is like the heavy tank of rockets. Insane. I suppose that's what they will need for minimal refurbishment between flights.

  • @Billybobble1
    @Billybobble1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's actually quite ridiculous just how long it takes to blow up considering how easily rockets can blow up. Needs more Philip Glass I feel though.

  • @vatovega
    @vatovega 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Do you guys feel SpaceX should have improved the launch pad system before first launch?

    • @UnshavenStatue
      @UnshavenStatue 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      nah, they already knew before the first launch they would need to upgrade it, and altho it was worse than expected it still had little long term impact, since the upgrade was already in the works. if anything, the first orbital launch only saved them some digging for the upgrade lol

  • @quantumcat7673
    @quantumcat7673 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So there was a slight anomaly!

  • @Quarkburger
    @Quarkburger 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dang, why so blurry?

  • @a3bilbaneo842
    @a3bilbaneo842 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What would be a reason to have the other 3 camera views classified? (As stated in the description)

    • @UnshavenStatue
      @UnshavenStatue 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      most likely because those views are considereed proprietary business secrets of spacex. probably not classified in the govt/mil sense, but in the commercial sense (which is standard). but im just guessing

    • @cod6guy12
      @cod6guy12 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Perhaps they are high resolution thermal cameras or something and the government doesn't want to show how good they are, similar to spy satellite images.

    • @brianv1988
      @brianv1988 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well considering China is trying to build their own similar Starship I wouldn't want all my secrets out on the cloud😅

  • @Marvinfj32
    @Marvinfj32 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Go big or go home!!

  • @jfeeney100
    @jfeeney100 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe not quite so strong. I did see a lot of flames coming off the side of the rocket after the tumbling started. Yes the rocket heald together, but some cracks did open letting fuel and oxidizer out to explode on the outside of the rocket. But the fact it held together even when falling sideway, and being on fire is impressive. Usually when rockets get sideways, the air pressures will tear the rocket apart. Not in this case.

    • @Wee_L_LR
      @Wee_L_LR 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That’s because the FTS blew holes in the tanks however this did not terminate the vehicle as expected. That’s why it took time for it to break up

  • @johnrday2023
    @johnrday2023 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Congrats to the entire Spacex team on another successfull launch!

  • @alexsandrshatilov7143
    @alexsandrshatilov7143 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ой жалко ракетку, так шустро летела и как старалась!!! Шикарная машина, учитывая её размеры и стоимость! А сколько труда???
    Руководители полёта, до последнего момента тянули с уничтожением аппарата, получали информацию об нём! Взорвать всегда успеют, тем более что ракета летела уже над океаном!

  • @Jasmine_breeze
    @Jasmine_breeze 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I my country one politician claims that those are"chemical trails of secret government" 🤦

  • @johnmoruzzi7236
    @johnmoruzzi7236 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Completely different perspective... you can see how the streams of leaking methane get bigger and wider, and cause the bizzare fireball that trails the rocket as it spins and flips, even after the FTS punched more holes in it.

  • @georgeharrison2795
    @georgeharrison2795 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sad event

  • @stevebeal5098
    @stevebeal5098 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    “Obviously a major malfunction.”

    • @ThompPL1
      @ThompPL1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But certainly NOT a Challenger Space Shuttle level of human disaster though ! 🙄

  • @user-md2ib2cm3y
    @user-md2ib2cm3y 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Denis Lehman
    Karen Lehman
    Artificial intelligence androids deployed

  • @DougVanDorn
    @DougVanDorn 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Well -- nice idea, too bad it's all so badly out of focus that its usefulness as a tool to analyze the flight was virtually nil. At the range between the WB-57 and the rocket, you simply set focus to infinity, it's impossible to focus *behind* the rocket. (I have a photography degree, I'm positive of that.) What we are seeing here looks like total incompetence on the part of the camera operators. Very sad.

    • @dagger4146
      @dagger4146 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Wow, you have a Photography Degree ! My grandson has a Business Degree ! He hands out tools at a job site, do you do that too ???

    • @gregsonwoods
      @gregsonwoods 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@dagger4146 Was it in focus for you then? Wow.

    • @seaharrierfrs1
      @seaharrierfrs1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If this works like a fighters targeting pod you cannot manually change the focus.

    • @dagger4146
      @dagger4146 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@gregsonwoods Looked pretty good for being 47 kilometers away, which is nearly 30 miles. Plus flying at around 30,000 feet and travelling around 300 miles per hour. As for analytics, plenty can be gleaned from that footage. Like the FTS not working as it should have, failure to shut down engines that were still running, plus a better view and understanding of the flight path. The total loss of control of the booster very early in the flight is also very prominent in this video.

    • @gregsonwoods
      @gregsonwoods 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@dagger4146 Sometimes it's in focus and often it's not.. it shouldn't be left to the camera to search for a focus.. it's effectively at infinity,, as DougVanDorn said.

  • @chefchase33
    @chefchase33 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    starship is never going to work

    • @aqeelraja4750
      @aqeelraja4750 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Why not?

    • @motokid6008
      @motokid6008 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They said the same with Falcon 9 and the entirety of SpaceX. Why people still bet against them is beyond me.

    • @brianv1988
      @brianv1988 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's what they said about a lot of things in here we are today with two space stations floating around Earth and thousands of satellites

    • @armandomercado2248
      @armandomercado2248 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@motokid6008Ok, Tim Dobb.

    • @motokid6008
      @motokid6008 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@armandomercado2248 - I don't know what that means.