FRC Coaches Webinar 16 12 24

00:08 Welcome and Outcomes of the Webinar (JC)
01:55 The 7 Core Enhancements Graphic and Dissent
02:21 Section 1: Dissent (JH)
03:35 Tactical Fouls, Aggressive Fouls, Dissent
04:46 The 50m advancement for Tactical Fouling
06:35 Penalty for delaying or interfering with an opponent taking a free kick or sideline kick
07:30 Returning the ball on the full
08:32 The Square Ball from free kick rules
09:09 Cynical behaviour for deliberately holding up a player
09:50 To Contribute to a Melee
10:56 Head on Head, Should on Head or elbow on head contact
11:36 To show dissent with the referee’s decision to award a free kick to the opposing team
13:40 Abusive misconduct at games by team officials
15:08 To show dissent by a player at U17 or younger grades
17:17 Video examples Dissent Section
23:51 FAQ Infractions animations
26:06 Section 2: 1 v 1 Throw in Section (CN)
27:30 Video examples 1 v 1 Throw in Section
29:25 Question-How teams decide what position non jumping player takes at start of game? (JC)
30:20 Section 3: Players may be inside 20m before Kickout (EF)
32:17 Pitch Graphic Dimensions
32:58 Video examples Kickouts Section
35:05 Question- Does a goalie have to place the ball on 20m or can they place behind the 20m line?
What happens if players aren’t 13m from the ball?
35:53 FAQ Kickouts animations
36:37 Section 4: No backpass to goalkeeper must be passed ½ line (CC)
39:10 Video examples Goalkeeper Section
40:56 Question-The only time a keeper can receive a ball other than outside the large rectangle is in own half as part of 12 players attacking?
Can the goalkeeper still tackle in own half?
Are the new rules applicable to all age groups?
41:55 FAQ Goalkeeper animations
43:20 Section 5: 40m Scoring arc and scoring system (JH)
43:58 2pt Scoring Area
45:22 Scoring system
46:32 Video examples Scoring Section
48:31 FAQ Scoring animations
48:46 Question-Is a 45m worth? What if a defender touches the ball after being kicked outside the 40m arc?
49:26 Section 6: 3 v 3 structure (EF)
51:30 Video examples 3 v 3 structure section
56:03 FAQ 3v3 Structure animations
56:17 Question-Can the goalie be one of the 3 players in our half?
On the 3 v 3 foul-can that be brought outside the arc for 2pt attempt?
57:00 Section 7: Solo and Go (CN)
58:06 Video examples Solo and Go section
01:00:28 FAQ Solo and Go animations
01:00:30 Can I take a Solo and Go anywhere on the pitch?
Does the solo and go have to be standing still or moving forward? How far does defender have to retreat?
01:04:16 Section 8: Advanced Mark inside 20m (CC)
01:05:50 Video examples Advanced Mark section
01:07:26 FAQ Advanced Mark Section
01:08:30 Section 9: Games Administration (EF)
01:08:45 Stop Clock
01:10:17 Vanishing White Foam
01:10:30 Video examples Foam Section
01:11:08 Advantage Rule
01:11:59 Empowering Line Umpires
01:14:37 Section 10: Resources, Wrap Up and Thanks (JC)

[@dgb916]

a 50m penalty for not handing the ball back and not retreating properly is a load of pure bollocks

[@johnenright]

Thats the rule - has been in the AFL for 100 years and they do just fine.

[@dannymahon6929]

Agree. The reasoning is good. But it's too harsh.
Would simply leaving the ball down & retreating not suffice?

[@dgb916]

​@@johnenright a totally different sport and a totally different application of the rule.
They use it because they have a rule where a tackler wins a free kick for grappling the player in possession to the ground. Common sense tells you that the natural thing to do when grappled to the ground would be to lie on the ball and delay the thing, so they brought in the hand it back rule.
We don't have that rule and don't have anything similar to it. There are very few instances where simply releasing the ball isn't sufficient, they could even have included "release the ball and don't cause a delay" to cover throwing the ball away or general messing. The extra step of finding your nearest opponent, running over to hand it directly to them is so unnatural for our sport and ridiculous in how it looks in practice, that it seems crazy that anyone thought this could be a good idea. I hope this load of shite gets binned at the first opportunity and it was deeply disappointing that congress hasn't already intervened.
Two more points
1. The AFL rarely has confusion over who won a free kick when the referees whistle is blown. The GAA regularly has confusion, even at intercounty where standards are higher. In the railway cup games, every time a player held the ball for a few seconds to check what the ref has blown for, if was against the man holding the ball it was moved forward. A complete load of utter nonsense.
That is at a high standard too with intercounty players and refs. Imagine how this will go at club level with inconsistent application everywhere, it will cause mayhem - worsened by the rule that the brought forward free kick can be moved to the edge of the arc for a handy 2 pointer.
2. AFL players barely stay in possession for more than a few seconds, they have very few technical rules where the player in possession can cause a foul on their own. They don't have the overcarry rule for example. Forcing players to run around the pitch to find the nearest opponent, who could be 15 metres away and in no hurry to take the free if they're winning, while already frustrated at giving the foul away, is just plainly ridiculous. There would be no difference in the speed of the game if the player dropped the ball where the foul happened. Instead, this daft pile of shite has player running around the place like a bunch of tubes.

[@dgb916]

@@johnenright ​ a totally different sport and a totally different application of the rule.
They use it because they have a rule where a tackler wins a free kick for grappling the player in possession to the ground. Common sense tells you that the natural thing to do when grappled to the ground would be to lie on the ball and delay the thing, so they brought in the hand it back rule.
We don't have that rule and don't have anything similar to it. There are very few instances where simply releasing the ball isn't sufficient, they could even have included "release the ball and don't cause a delay" to cover throwing the ball away or general messing. The extra step of finding your nearest opponent, running over to hand it directly to them is so unnatural for our sport and ridiculous in how it looks in practice, that it seems crazy that anyone thought this could be a good idea. I hope this gets binned at the first opportunity and it was deeply disappointing that congress didn't change it before they voted.
Two more points
1. The AFL rarely has confusion over who won a free kick when the referees whistle is blown. The GAA regularly has confusion, even at intercounty where standards are higher. In the railway cup games, every time a player held the ball for a few seconds to check what the ref has blown for, if was against the man holding the ball it was moved forward. A complete load of utter nonsense.
That is at a high standard too with intercounty players and refs. Imagine how this will go at club level with inconsistent application everywhere, it will cause mayhem - worsened by the rule that the brought forward free kick can be moved to the edge of the arc for a handy 2 pointer.
2. AFL players barely stay in possession for more than a few seconds, they have very few technical rules where the player in possession can cause a foul on their own. They don't have the overcarry rule for example. Forcing players to run around the pitch to find the nearest opponent, who could be 15 metres away and in no hurry to take the free if they're winning, while already frustrated at giving the foul away, is just plainly ridiculous. There would be no difference in the speed of the game if the player dropped the ball where the foul happened and was allowed to get back and help his team. Instead, this daft rule has players running around the place like a bunch of tubes.

[@alandoolan1892]

18.24...I think this is harsh,re handing the ball back in the full ...