Elizabeth Warren: Rebuilding the Middle Class
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024
- (Visit: www.uctv.tv) Harvard professor Elizabeth Warren, newly appointed by President Obama to set up the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, outlines what is wrong with today’s financial markets and how to help the middle class rebound from the recession in this 2010 address at UC Berkeley. [11/2010] [Public Affairs] [Business] [Show ID: 20014]
![ผัวเถื่อน - ยูริ โตเกียวมิวสิค [ OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P08ORRVDGl8/mqdefault.jpg)
You are mixing apples and oranges. She's not talking about Keynes at all, nor does her organization have anything to do with fiscal policy. This institution is about the gains from trade between families and the financial industry accruing more to families and less to the financial industry. By eliminating information asymmetry, it will make markets FREER; it will make them function MORE efficiently.
Watch 6:51. Amazing, what a service she provided for consumers to help them understand the fine print of contracts.
It's a cryin' shame what's happened to us.Throwing more money at the people who caused this isn't going to fix the problem. We need our government to stand up for us, not for whoever's financing their campaigns and sending lobbyists to work in their favor. If they're working together for the good of everyone, that's okay, but they're in bed with each other for their own greed and screwing us. That's unsustainable and we have to demand change!
YES! We’ve got to stop voting for Republicans. They are the Party of the Obscenely Wealthy!
How could you not want to vote for this woman as U.S. Senator from Massachusetts?
I'm with you all the way. You give me hope, Elizabeth Warren.
Yeah, can you still say that now that you know has become corrupted and part of the democratic establishment and betrayed her best friend Bernie Sanders????
I like Elizabeth. She is smart, sincere, and kind. I hope that her agency achieves all that she hopes for.
Oh, please. The NFIB is a Republican interest group. They are as connected to the needs of small businesses as McDonald's is to the rights of cows.
Regarding the intro, the reason there were no restrictions on the Tarp monies was due to the connections of that administration to Citi bank and probably the idea of the Washington Consensus that sees government job as to support business for wherever and for whatever.
You cannot make an omelette with smashed eggs. I got this 12 years later.
This comes as no shock, but is insightful nonetheless. :)
I wish this got more coverage.
Her talk on the Middle Class Collapse is amazing.
Two take-homes:
- The 1% can help by not *building* expensive houses that eventually trickle down to raise housing costs (through resale) faster than the growth rate.
- we can all help by funding those seeking low-cost solutions to aging-related disease.
Small business build the homes
these people do not understand completely the basis of the monetary system, they dont see the big picture. its effect has expired quite some time ago.
Yes, Nathan Tacchini, just cite some business lobbying group's groundless and biased claims that she supports unspecified "measures" that would cost jobs. Oh, yes she is really the enemy of employment.
She's anti - business typical democrat
@@coopsnz1
No, she’s not. She’s anti-Too-Big-To-Fail businesses. The ones like GE and Facebook that buy out their competition.
@@DeborahDyer she anti any business
@@coopsnz1
Nope! She’s anti-corruption and there’s a big difference!
@biozamadotcom yes...and what rather would you see?
Since many people already believe there are too many federal agencies, I can only wonder why anyone would want to create yet another. Would it perform the function it is designed?
It DID! Until Donald Trump anyway. It’s the Consumer Protection Bureau and quite easy to look up.
I must be stupid...
I dont know who to believe anymore.
The redemption is in your being able to question/doubt.
One reason to not vote for her is a supposition that is not backed by facts. The other is because of something you heard that she did not say.
You probably made your decision and are searching around for a justification for that decision. It's something we all do. Some of us recognize this human foible and try to guard against it when we notice our doing it ourselves.
NOT... This is probably one of the most inaccurate posts I've ever seen on youtube.
Warren also supports measures bills that will cost over 700,000 jobs, according to am official report by the National Federation of independent business
bullshit
Absolute bullshit.
As I was doing some research, I discovered that Elizabeth Warren did actually spend a brief period of time practicing law. In one of her few real trials, she defended Traveler's Insurance against victims of Asbestos who lost family members or developed cancer due to Asbestos exposure. She helped to gain the company PERMANENT IMMUNITY FOR ASBESTOS RELATED VICTIMS. Her compensation: $212,000. Some champion of the middle class...
She's a Legend in her own mind
If you despise freedom and you hate America, then vote for Elizabeth Warren in 2012!
I did and will again! I send money to her campaign also! She’s amazing and I LOVE her!
Finally, a real force appeared that could change this, the very material basis that was lacking. These are stocks, exchanges and robots. The essence of the example is clear, and is not limited to this particular activity. Meanwhile two years ago in China: ABB Robots work at BAIC, China watch?v=ymBQGoeGqG0
Cld u send the link again