These interviews are so fascinating, and incredibly important in my opinion. I have watched every single one of them at least 3 times, and I assure you, I'll be watching them again, and again... Thank you for this!! It is so important, especially for the youngsters, to here this history, from the people who were there, and there is absolutely no other way to absorb this priceless information. Hope to see it all in person this fall, during my very first visit to Dallas, and The Sixth Floor Museum.
I appreciate so much these Living History interviews. So great to watch Marvin Scott tell his personal stories about Abraham Zapruder and Martin Luther King. Stephen Fagin always conducts a compelling interview.
48:00: He acts like microchips, heart monitors, cell phones (LOL!) and GPS would not have been developed if the space program wasn't around. He forgets the ludicrous amounts of military spending that led (or would have led) to the same technologies. I am all for the space program, but let's not embellish the record.
48:22: *And NO, the silicon-based microchip was NOT invented in Texas by Jack Kilby of TI.* It was invented by Robert Noyce of Fairchild (and later of Intel). Kilby's far less meaningful patent was for the miniaturization of electronic circuits onto germanium, but not onto silicon. Sorry, Texas.
"While Robert Noyce at Fairchild Semiconductor also independently invented the integrated circuit shortly after Kilby, Kilby's design got there first. The integrated circuit would later become universally known as the microchip. This game-changing invention enabled the miniaturization and affordability of electronics like calculators, computers, and more. For their breakthrough contribution, Kilby and Noyce went on to share the 2000 Nobel Prize in Physics." www.historytools.org/people/jack-kilby-complete-biography
Oswald owned the rifle. Oswald smuggled the rifle. Oswald's latent print was on the rifle. Oswald lied to police about his whereabouts during the shooting. Oswald had every bullet and fragment ever found matched to his rifle. Oswald was a perfectly plausible match to the shooter seen in the window. No unidentified persons were ever seen in the building. Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there. Zapruder's secretary was only yards away from the fence and saw and heard nobody there. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a trajectory and track straight back to the window. Kennedy is very clearly seen to suffer a massive exit wound exploding at the right temple consistent with a shot from behind. Connally's said the shots all came from behind. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos. Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee the crime scene and never return. Oswald took evasive action to sneak back to his rooming house. Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as shooting Officer Tippit and fleeing. Oswald owned and was in possession of the weapon the shells were matched to. Oswald discarded his jacket between the crime scene and the theater, complete with fibres from his shirt. Oswald was plainly seen trying to hide in a storefront from passing police Oswald was plainly seen ducking into a theater to dodge more passing police. Oswald was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop. Oswald fought so violently 3 officers were injured just disarming him. Oswald observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing. Oswald refused to cooperate with any investigator. Oswald never attempted to blow any conspiracy to anybody. Oswald turned down help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association. Oswald was only interested in a lawyer he'd never met living in another state who specialized in left-wing causes. Oswald acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty. Oswald just shrugged a hollow, rambling, unsurprised reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@@jimbo16720 No, I just see value in alerting people when they are being misled by paranoid crackpots like yourself who summarily dismiss all evidence without comment or alternate explanations. No doubt you will of course now explain how somebody safely approached scores and scores of witnesses, bystanders, Oswald family members, police, sheriffs, detectives, patrolmen, FBI, Secret Service, military personnel, doctors, pathologists, ballistics experts, x-ray technicians, photographers, film experts, whole commissions, lawyers, counsels, senators, congressmen, journalists, shoe store clerks, etc., and persuaded them all to obey illegal orders to commit grave crimes, assist a bloody coup, help ensure the successful escape from justice of the "real killers" of a brother police officer with a wife and 3 children, and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason, yes?
The Sixth floor group is doing such a wonderful job with this. I appreciate the work you guys do. Thank You
Glad you enjoy it!
These interviews are so fascinating, and incredibly important in my opinion. I have watched every single one of them at least 3 times, and I assure you, I'll be watching them again, and again...
Thank you for this!! It is so important, especially for the youngsters, to here this history, from the people who were there, and there is absolutely no other way to absorb this priceless information.
Hope to see it all in person this fall, during my very first visit to Dallas, and The Sixth Floor Museum.
I love your interviews!!🎉🎉
I appreciate so much these Living History interviews. So great to watch Marvin Scott tell his personal stories about Abraham Zapruder and Martin Luther King. Stephen Fagin always conducts a compelling interview.
Stephen, I always enjoy your interviews. You do a great job letting your subject just tell their story.
What a spectacular guest! Fascinating
Stephen fagin is a great iterviewer, not easy to get people to open up and he is really good
Great Interview, Thank You.
fascinating interview!
Marvin Scott was 21 in 1963.
Be careful, he looks so youthful, Marvin Scott might be a vampire!
48:00: He acts like microchips, heart monitors, cell phones (LOL!) and GPS would not have been developed if the space program wasn't around. He forgets the ludicrous amounts of military spending that led (or would have led) to the same technologies. I am all for the space program, but let's not embellish the record.
48:22: *And NO, the silicon-based microchip was NOT invented in Texas by Jack Kilby of TI.* It was invented by Robert Noyce of Fairchild (and later of Intel). Kilby's far less meaningful patent was for the miniaturization of electronic circuits onto germanium, but not onto silicon. Sorry, Texas.
"While Robert Noyce at Fairchild Semiconductor also independently invented the integrated circuit shortly after Kilby, Kilby's design got there first. The integrated circuit would later become universally known as the microchip.
This game-changing invention enabled the miniaturization and affordability of electronics like calculators, computers, and more. For their breakthrough contribution, Kilby and Noyce went on to share the 2000 Nobel Prize in Physics." www.historytools.org/people/jack-kilby-complete-biography
Seems the 6th floor museum believes is was nobody but Oswald. To many things not right about the case in my mind to believe that.
Oswald owned the rifle.
Oswald smuggled the rifle.
Oswald's latent print was on the rifle.
Oswald lied to police about his whereabouts during the shooting.
Oswald had every bullet and fragment ever found matched to his rifle.
Oswald was a perfectly plausible match to the shooter seen in the window.
No unidentified persons were ever seen in the building.
Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there.
Zapruder's secretary was only yards away from the fence and saw and heard nobody there.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind.
Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a trajectory and track straight back to the window.
Kennedy is very clearly seen to suffer a massive exit wound exploding at the right temple consistent with a shot from behind.
Connally's said the shots all came from behind.
Autopsy shows the shots came from behind.
Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos.
Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee the crime scene and never return.
Oswald took evasive action to sneak back to his rooming house.
Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as shooting Officer Tippit and fleeing.
Oswald owned and was in possession of the weapon the shells were matched to.
Oswald discarded his jacket between the crime scene and the theater, complete with fibres from his shirt.
Oswald was plainly seen trying to hide in a storefront from passing police
Oswald was plainly seen ducking into a theater to dodge more passing police.
Oswald was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop.
Oswald fought so violently 3 officers were injured just disarming him.
Oswald observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing.
Oswald refused to cooperate with any investigator.
Oswald never attempted to blow any conspiracy to anybody.
Oswald turned down help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association.
Oswald was only interested in a lawyer he'd never met living in another state who specialized in left-wing causes.
Oswald acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty.
Oswald just shrugged a hollow, rambling, unsurprised reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@@aaronz7056 You believe what the government tells you....democrat aren't you?
@@jimbo16720 No, I just see value in alerting people when they are being misled by paranoid crackpots like yourself who summarily dismiss all evidence without comment or alternate explanations. No doubt you will of course now explain how somebody safely approached scores and scores of witnesses, bystanders, Oswald family members, police, sheriffs, detectives, patrolmen, FBI, Secret Service, military personnel, doctors, pathologists, ballistics experts, x-ray technicians, photographers, film experts, whole commissions, lawyers, counsels, senators, congressmen, journalists, shoe store clerks, etc., and persuaded them all to obey illegal orders to commit grave crimes, assist a bloody coup, help ensure the successful escape from justice of the "real killers" of a brother police officer with a wife and 3 children, and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason, yes?
@@jimbo16720 Conspiracy authors profiteering off an infamous event, would never lie to you, right?
The evidence itself(not the 6th Floor Museum) tells us it was Oswald and no other person.