The interruptions came thick and fast. It will be interesting to see how much more deference the old toad shows to Sunak tomorrow. That interview ought to have gone to O'Brien but Sunak would have backed out.
@@lostintranslation1957he said people who don’t have the ability to write a cheque for whatever services they require like private health.. so automatically you know he is talking about working class people. Did you want specifics on how much you got to earn?
Sir beer starmer isn't explaining what a working person is though he isn't even engaging with Nick just looking away Sir beer starmer is a person who will become prime minister by default by not many people trust him or like him
I'm not a fan of Stamer, but he has great composure when dealing with a fool like Nick n hes bang on about a working person not being able to write a cheque when they get into trouble
High earners are not working people as they can buy their way out of personal issues. They also get their income mainly from assets and pay much lower tax than some who is paid by PAYE.
Nick used Simon Cowell as example. How much of Cowell's money is being made for him by other people? Not saying he doesn't work but as Starmer said, Cowell has no need for public services, and could buy a house in central London on a whim and would barely notice the financial cost
@@glennjanot8128 They already pay enough. The top tax bracket pay 30% of all income tax generated inside of the country. You always say tax billionaires and millionaires, they are nice talking points until you realise all of it is in Untaxable assets or shares. Please stop blaming the wealthy and middle classes who often times have built themselves out of poverty and into a position of home ownership and prosperity for the failings of governmental bureaucracy. The web of Welfare is a taxing system, whether it be the bureaucratic structure of the NHS that burns more money then it uses well or the simple loopholes inside of our welfare system that due to its massive size go unnoticed. Implement more efficient and cheaper systems and cut taxes for everybody.
Even if we assume Simon Cowell is domiciled in the UK for tax purposes (though more likely it'll be in the USA), any "work" he does here would not be salaried. Rather a payment would be made under contract to his limited company. There are a number of tax-efficient ways for him to spend and extract that money. Therefore he's earning a fortune and paying less tax. Its clear to anyone (other than those who like to use semantics to try ro swerve reality) that his situation isn't comparable to a day-to-day salaried worker. Nick is being purposely obtuse to play up to his Tory base.
@@lostintranslation1957 He's literally chaired panel sessions at the last three Tory conferences. He's a dye in the wool Tory (he was even a member for many years). Nick Ferrari and impartiality have never met.
Does Simon Cowell survive on what he makes working? No? Then he's a hobbyist who could retire. Not a working person. Normal people aren't going to struggle to make that distinction, it's only people like Nick who find that complicated to understand.
Put it a different way; Working people hit zero in their bank within 3 months of having no work. So they HAVE to work for a living. Others have the luxury of CHOICE to work, as they could live on passive income.
But that is down to the level of education you have and whether you fooled around in school or you knuckled down and worked hard. I am guessing you didn't?
They have been completely specific about what they mean, because they said theyre not going to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT. People who get most of their money from wages they get from a job pay most of their taxes through these taxes, that's who they mean and they're completely clear on this. The other people are people whose money doesn't come from wages. Capital gains, dividends, rents, options grants, trusts, etc. They have not promised not to raise these taxes.
You're kind of the only person in a dream world thinking they don't work. You can literally look on Google for free and it tells you what they do as part of their jobs.
@@Trendycosmetics-os6ghStarmer is a joke. Rishi is the best the Torys have had for nearly a decade and unfortunately he's too little too late. It appears that the electorate either want to teach the tories a lesson or, have finally cottoned on that it's not best practice to keep electing a party, who's policies benifit less than 5% of the population. Just like whan many chose Johnson because Corbin was unelectable, I suspect Starmer will be chosen because many feel they don't have a choice.
The point he us making is Simon Cowell IS a working person. However, what Labour mean is anyone with savings of £1000 or more, is NOT what they consider a working person. Do your research.
A working person is someone who works more hours than they should to get by, but gets ripped to shreds by the government and tax man.... Public services? Is there any left?
Why can’t Starmer just say a working class grunt who can’t afford to pay for anything because of decades old wage stagnation, labours in a dead end job for an exploitative employer, and who would have been dead years ago if it wasn’t for the NHS?
at what financial de-markation line is the need to work and choose to work drawn, because i haven't wrote a cheque for over 25 years and i'm a pensioner, so the ability to write a cheque has nothing to do with working class.
Keir Starmer should have used George Galloway's definition. A working person is anyone who meeds to work to pay the bills. That includes doctors, some famous celebrities, maybe Nick himself? Most of us!
Anyone who can’t write a cheque? So, that basically excludes all senior nurses, teachers, police, firefighters, train drivers, military and Christ knows how many others, not to mention plumbers, builders, electricians and skilled tradesmen.🤣🤣🤣
There will be an awful lot more people who won't have the ability to write a cheque when they get into trouble once this humpty and the rest of them get into power! Heaven help us all!
Why is so hard to comprehend? He means working class But he don’t wanna say tha now to make all the rich who are about to get fairly taxed like the rest of us, bail It’s simple! Time to pay your fair share End of
does that include keir starmer or rachel reeves and her husband or angela rayner and her husband. make sure you include EVERYBODY, then think if you were a self made millionaire where would you live and would you employ an accountant for ADVICE, i wonder ?
For someone who is an experienced lawyer he is a really bad public speaker and is terrible at being interviewed. I would never have hired him as my lawyer if I needed one
You are right, he can come across as lacking confidence under interview I think it maybe a characteristic that is lacking in most popularist politicians these days,,,, humility. You want to see him in action at primeministers question time, it's completely diferent. Very confident, it's when the passion comes out. Much more convincing. If you like that sort of thing.
@@keithmiller1467 TH-cam won't let me tell you but it involved baffonery, being punched by Merton and Hislop and not being included control of your telly, let alone a country.🤣
It's pretty obvious that Starmer is talking about people who live more pay check to pay check. The likes of Simon Cowell may still work, but they could choose not to and be very comfortable by most if not all standards of living. Why do elections always get dragged down in to these silly little semantic games instead of truly focussing on issues and how we solve them?
It's not the best definition of working people I've ever heard, but it makes sense and if he helped those people he would be doing the right thing. As far as I'm concerned, he won that.
Our services? You mean the public purse which belongs to the tax payers? You mean the people who work hard and have to be topped up by benefits because you allowed zero contracts? You mean the people who work for companies earning millions/billion having to have their wages topped up by taxes payers whilst those companies announce how many millions they made in the first quarter please shut up tired of this foolish game the system needs revamping and all mps should be put on zero hour contracts then they would understand the stresses that working class people have to put up with its clear to see you all sold your souks for 30 pieces of silver and imagine having a contract where there was no liabilities to the pharmaceutical companies I mean who does that and where was your voice when all this was happening?
Just Nick deliberately being a bell end.
The interruptions came thick and fast. It will be interesting to see how much more deference the old toad shows to Sunak tomorrow. That interview ought to have gone to O'Brien but Sunak would have backed out.
They are both that.
That's what Nick does best. Being a bell end.
Nick being an idiot. Not a fan of starmer but he’s clear on who he means as a working person.
Clear as mud that is
@@harveysaunders2479to people who want it to be.
Clear?
Then he could have just said 90% of the population.
@@lostintranslation1957he said people who don’t have the ability to write a cheque for whatever services they require like private health.. so automatically you know he is talking about working class people. Did you want specifics on how much you got to earn?
Nick deliberately playing the fool thinking it makes him look clever as usual.
He made Starmer look pretty silly here
Nick being a k**b as per usual
Sir beer starmer isn't explaining what a working person is though he isn't even engaging with Nick just looking away
Sir beer starmer is a person who will become prime minister by default by not many people trust him or like him
@@stephenweir9871 who would want to engage with nick
@andrewholdaway813 If you're not going to engage with the interviewer, then why go to the interview to answer his questions
@@stephenweir9871
He did engage with the fool
@@stephenweir9871I trust him more than any Tory you can name in the last 14 years. He answered the question, he explained what a working person is.
LBC lost that round. Starmer was spot on...
You tribalists will never wake up.
not really
Sheep 🐑
Bs stammer the wef pick getting off scott free.
😂😂..paid troll
I'm not a fan of Stamer, but he has great composure when dealing with a fool like Nick n hes bang on about a working person not being able to write a cheque when they get into trouble
Yet another gullible followers. Baah!
@lostintranslation1957 😂😂😂😂 brother can u not read I can't stand the guy
what does that even mean?
@@neonwired4978 it simply means I can't stand the guy
@lostintranslation1957 another victim of our educational standards.
Yes mate, you're middle class and the Tories love you.
(Bless)
Where did he pluck the name simon Cowell from? Well done kier for ignoring his stupidity
I think he secretly fancies him.
High earners are not working people as they can buy their way out of personal issues. They also get their income mainly from assets and pay much lower tax than some who is paid by PAYE.
You think £4/3/2 even 100k, a year cant buy their way out of personal issues?
😂 What are you smoking
Nick used Simon Cowell as example. How much of Cowell's money is being made for him by other people?
Not saying he doesn't work but as Starmer said, Cowell has no need for public services, and could buy a house in central London on a whim and would barely notice the financial cost
Soo your saying that high earners, work for there wealth and use that wealth to buy assets.
I don’t see what makes them not a working person
@@ADrexlerx It makes them working people who don't need tax cuts and who also can afford to pay a little more in taxes.
It's that simple.
@@glennjanot8128 They already pay enough. The top tax bracket pay 30% of all income tax generated inside of the country. You always say tax billionaires and millionaires, they are nice talking points until you realise all of it is in Untaxable assets or shares.
Please stop blaming the wealthy and middle classes who often times have built themselves out of poverty and into a position of home ownership and prosperity for the failings of governmental bureaucracy.
The web of Welfare is a taxing system, whether it be the bureaucratic structure of the NHS that burns more money then it uses well or the simple loopholes inside of our welfare system that due to its massive size go unnoticed.
Implement more efficient and cheaper systems and cut taxes for everybody.
Starmer comes across with honesty and empathy. 👍🏻
Really ?
Have a word with yourself mate
Agreed. Add a bit of humility too. Unfortunately this can come across as week, up against the arrogant grifters the electorate has got used to.
@@gregsmith7821"Arrogant". You are talking about Starmer, you have described him. How easily manipulated are you usually? Did you get loads of Jabs?
@@lostintranslation1957 Thanks for the spell check, have edited accordingly.👍
I don't think you're Simon Cowell's type Nick. You're probably a bit too rotund for him 🤔
😂😂
Even if we assume Simon Cowell is domiciled in the UK for tax purposes (though more likely it'll be in the USA), any "work" he does here would not be salaried. Rather a payment would be made under contract to his limited company. There are a number of tax-efficient ways for him to spend and extract that money. Therefore he's earning a fortune and paying less tax. Its clear to anyone (other than those who like to use semantics to try ro swerve reality) that his situation isn't comparable to a day-to-day salaried worker. Nick is being purposely obtuse to play up to his Tory base.
Nick who for many years a Tory fan boy, trying his best to get one over Starmer!
When was he Tory fan boy? Was he conservative or socialist Tory?
@@lostintranslation1957 where have you been in the past 20 years! He was always on shows attacking anything labour proposed! He's a true blue.
it's not difficult... he couldn't even describe his electorate
@@lostintranslation1957 He's literally chaired panel sessions at the last three Tory conferences. He's a dye in the wool Tory (he was even a member for many years). Nick Ferrari and impartiality have never met.
Dont worry pet. You wef master starmer has got plenty of blind support from the rest of the media
If only Nick had shown the same zeal when he had Johnson in, time and time again.
Come on, this is very simple. If you get most of your money from wages, you're a working person.
Does Simon Cowell survive on what he makes working? No? Then he's a hobbyist who could retire. Not a working person. Normal people aren't going to struggle to make that distinction, it's only people like Nick who find that complicated to understand.
Put it a different way;
Working people hit zero in their bank within 3 months of having no work. So they HAVE to work for a living.
Others have the luxury of CHOICE to work, as they could live on passive income.
Nick IDFerrari, what is a fat person?
"What is a working person?"
"Not you, Nick."
Nick Ferrari so out of touch and probably thinks the King is a working man.
Well done Starmer, ignored Ferrari’s interruptions and answered well. Ferrari must have been mad.
People who pay taxes via PAYE. Simple.
So self-employed aren’t workers?
Not the self employed then?
Well done Starmer, put Nick in his place. This is the voice of the normal people who can't write a cheque when they get into trouble. At last! ❤
Silly question, I guess Nick has no idea himself. What a waste of an opportunity to ask proper questions.
Sounds like a reasonable definition
Is that supposed to be a gotcha? That was weak.
What Nick is doing here is exposing that Starmer DOES NOT CARE FOR WORKING PEOPLE!!
A working person works all his life pays taxes on every thing and ends up broke after 45 years of craft/ jobs dont work its a con
But that is down to the level of education you have and whether you fooled around in school or you knuckled down and worked hard.
I am guessing you didn't?
One of my most hated phrases this whole election. Its so empty, it means nothing
They have been completely specific about what they mean, because they said theyre not going to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT. People who get most of their money from wages they get from a job pay most of their taxes through these taxes, that's who they mean and they're completely clear on this.
The other people are people whose money doesn't come from wages. Capital gains, dividends, rents, options grants, trusts, etc. They have not promised not to raise these taxes.
@@fang_xianfu Its freighting that you can articulate that… but not the leader of the labour Party
Starmer just described what it means to
@@RoyaleBxngYou don’t listen to what he said
Ferrari will believe there are working royals
Utter 🤡 👞
You're kind of the only person in a dream world thinking they don't work. You can literally look on Google for free and it tells you what they do as part of their jobs.
Nick Ferrari with his usual pointless questions...
Just Nick Ferrari not letting people speak again, this isn't exactly news
Starmer is the biggest tool his dad made..!
Clueless leader of the free world
Nick needs to learn that when you don’t have anything sensible to say you should keep your mouth shut
Who writes a cheque in 2024?
Even King Charles deals in suitcases, back packs and supermarket plastic bags filled with cash.
Simon Cowell??? How old is this boomer’s pop culture references??
He doesn't know what a woman is either😂😂😂
Fine tuning will come after 4th July win
You know what on the 5th of July it will be Frank Sunak standing at number 10 not evasive Starmer. Starmer is a joke.
@@Trendycosmetics-os6ghStarmer is a joke. Rishi is the best the Torys have had for nearly a decade and unfortunately he's too little too late. It appears that the electorate either want to teach the tories a lesson or, have finally cottoned on that it's not best practice to keep electing a party, who's policies benifit less than 5% of the population.
Just like whan many chose Johnson because Corbin was unelectable, I suspect Starmer will be chosen because many feel they don't have a choice.
The point he us making is Simon Cowell IS a working person. However, what Labour mean is anyone with savings of £1000 or more, is NOT what they consider a working person. Do your research.
Simon Cowell is not working class.
This is what happens when you abuse the phrase "working person" to gain votes.
You end up looking like a jabbering fool.
what starmer means is he's going to tax anybody that has more than a grand in savings
Maybe Nick has never actually met a working person and truly thinks Simon Cowell fits the bill.
A working person is someone who works more hours than they should to get by, but gets ripped to shreds by the government and tax man.... Public services? Is there any left?
Why can’t Starmer just say a working class grunt who can’t afford to pay for anything because of decades old wage stagnation, labours in a dead end job for an exploitative employer, and who would have been dead years ago if it wasn’t for the NHS?
I'm voting Labour 🛑
What a weird, pointless question.
Marx said the working class were anyone who, if they stopped working, would wither away and die.
What a bizarre answer by Starmer. I worked down the pit for the first part of my working life. By Starmer's definition miners aren't working people
The problem with scoop journalism is everyone is trying to find that golden viral moment..
How is this interviewer who is mediocre at best and downright hopeless at worst even still at LBC?
Ditch him, get someone lively in, geez Louise
Won’t increase taxes on “working people”. Redefines working people to mean flat bloke. If you earn 30k+ your taxes will be going up.
Starmer is a joke 😂
Come election night this Ferrari will blow a head gasket.
A working person is someone who works for a living because they NEED to, not because they choose to. Simple.
at what financial de-markation line is the need to work and choose to work drawn, because i haven't wrote a cheque for over 25 years and i'm a pensioner, so the ability to write a cheque has nothing to do with working class.
he is a liar He wont Tax the rich or tax energy firm making record profits
Anyone who earns under 30k a year would have been the easy answer lol
A working person is what pays his wages.
So it’s safe to say that Starmer isn’t actually working person then because he can generally just write a check to fix anything
Working people are people who rely on their income from their day job. Simon Cowell may work but he doesn't need to.
So me as a factory worker who works 60 hours a week doesn’t use public services and can write a check isn’t a working person
Bet both their dad's were toolmakers 🤬🤬
One is certainly a tool
It's pretty straightforward. Someone who derives the majority of their income via exchange of their labour, rather than via utilisation of capital.
Has Simon Cowell ever worked? Has he calluses on his hands? Does he think hard
Wow. A grown man who is highly paid actually knows what a working person is. Give him a Peanut
An employee, below middle management level. Working class.
Nick Ferrari is a tool. Let your guests answer your questions. Back rub for Sunak next time though is it Mr Ferrari?
He doesn't need to define people with rainy-day savings out of the term "working people" - there is such a thing as the "working poor".
I cannot stand Kier Starmer, but come on - that is such a non-question from Nick! How does he have a career in this industry?
Shame he doesn’t have the courage to pressure any tories like this really.
Keir Starmer should have used George Galloway's definition. A working person is anyone who meeds to work to pay the bills. That includes doctors, some famous celebrities, maybe Nick himself? Most of us!
Anyone who can’t write a cheque?
So, that basically excludes all senior nurses, teachers, police, firefighters, train drivers, military and Christ knows how many others, not to mention plumbers, builders, electricians and skilled tradesmen.🤣🤣🤣
Simon Cowell is a Fantastic Wildlife presenter and rescuer of sick animals.
He should be Knighted. Great human being.🌹
There will be an awful lot more people who won't have the ability to write a cheque when they get into trouble once this humpty and the rest of them get into power! Heaven help us all!
The state of the Tories, this campaign should be an open goal for Labour, but Keir is doing a great job of hitting the goalposts
‘Pretty much every day’ So, some days he doesn’t meet people who work?
Well Nick " the blob " ferrari definitely doesn't count
Why is so hard to comprehend?
He means working class
But he don’t wanna say tha now to make all the rich who are about to get fairly taxed like the rest of us, bail
It’s simple!
Time to pay your fair share
End of
does that include keir starmer or rachel reeves and her husband or angela rayner and her husband. make sure you include EVERYBODY, then think if you were a self made millionaire where would you live and would you employ an accountant for ADVICE, i wonder ?
Let’s just represent those who are barely able to get a job. Great policy.
He means the people on benefits that cant be arsed to get out of bed and spend all day working the remote control.
LBC has an awful lot of bellends eh
For someone who is an experienced lawyer he is a really bad public speaker and is terrible at being interviewed. I would never have hired him as my lawyer if I needed one
shut up!
You are right, he can come across as lacking confidence under interview I think it maybe a characteristic that is lacking in most popularist politicians these days,,,, humility. You want to see him in action at primeministers question time, it's completely diferent. Very confident, it's when the passion comes out. Much more convincing. If you like that sort of thing.
So how would you disribe boris
@@keithmiller1467 TH-cam won't let me tell you but it involved baffonery, being punched by Merton and Hislop and not being included control of your telly, let alone a country.🤣
What is a woman?
What is a working person?
What planet does Starmer live on? I haven't written a cheque for 3 years! Shrugged off Simon Cowell what about Katie Price?
1-0 for Starmer
Keir: No tax rises!!!......well actually, just those who can't pay their bills.
A working person..... not keir starmer then!
He should have just said people who earn money using their hands and minds, not people who make money using money
It's pretty obvious that Starmer is talking about people who live more pay check to pay check. The likes of Simon Cowell may still work, but they could choose not to and be very comfortable by most if not all standards of living.
Why do elections always get dragged down in to these silly little semantic games instead of truly focussing on issues and how we solve them?
Because the Tories/Reform, and particularly their supporters, have no answers to the issues at hand, and most of them know it.
What the living fck is this? Simon Cowell? Working person?
It's not the best definition of working people I've ever heard, but it makes sense and if he helped those people he would be doing the right thing. As far as I'm concerned, he won that.
the sort of people labour and the tories hate
Simon Cowell, a multi Millionaire! Who actualy has a cheque book now?
Vote reform not this robot
"Thanks Nick" ..but still, no harm in asking him to elaborate
A working person is someone who works 😅
People who aren’t rich & have to work for a living.
Our services? You mean the public purse which belongs to the tax payers? You mean the people who work hard and have to be topped up by benefits because you allowed zero contracts? You mean the people who work for companies earning millions/billion having to have their wages topped up by taxes payers whilst those companies announce how many millions they made in the first quarter please shut up tired of this foolish game the system needs revamping and all mps should be put on zero hour contracts then they would understand the stresses that working class people have to put up with its clear to see you all sold your souks for 30 pieces of silver and imagine having a contract where there was no liabilities to the pharmaceutical companies I mean who does that and where was your voice when all this was happening?
Well said Kier. Someone who if something goes wrong with their car, cant just pay it.
Why does Nick keep butting in, it’s very rude.