I can't stand black women who try to use black men to do their dirty work, because they can't act civilly. Then they sit back, go shopping and laugh as their men go to jail. This is why they stay single.
The defendant makes no sense. She ain’t help nobody but herself in this case. Don’t trust people who boast about how charitable they are. They the biggest scammers.
The plaintiff was too overbearing to a stranger. She didn’t know that woman from Eve but she wanted her to pick up and drop off her child?? The defendant is also crazy for trying to bring in a stranger into her home and expecting it to work out.
I DON'T BELIEVE THE DEFENDANT WAS GOING TO EVER HAVE HER MOVE IN SHE ROBBED THE PLAINTIFF. SHE SEEN THAT SOMETHING WAS A BIT OFF & SHE WAS IN A TIGHT SPOT DISGUSTING ACTIONS FROM THE DEFENDANT
She's got "soldiers, " but none of those "soldiers " could help her pay her rent or get hair transplants for that balding left side of her head she's trying to disguise with that swoop hairpiece clip-on. I would've told her to send them and would've sent them to the next realm.
How can she move in with no key tho ? And the defendant has very dark energy the whole time” I’ll have my souljahs come to your job” ma’am that’s a threat . Plaintiff should’ve also sued for the threat . And she should’ve got paperwork don’t just give her money and then y’all aren’t even discussing everything via text they both said they would talk on the phone . Sad case
It was a game from day one! She preyed on this lady! I don’t want nobody to know where I live! If she’s renting, it’s where she lives also! Incredible!
Exactly; how did JM expect the plaintiff to move in with no key? The Defendant knew she was not letting her move in. Why would she refuse the Plaintiff's father from helping her move in? JM did not pay attention to the facts of the case
I think the judge got this one wrong , the Land Lord was real nice until she got the money , then she never answered her again . She took the lady money and run .
Nope she never told her she couldn’t move in. She never dined her access to the house. She just didn’t respond back to pick up and drop off of daughter. So the judge got it right lawfully.
It was a game from jump. The Defendant knew she was never going to let the plaintiff move in. Picking up the child was not for free, and JM missed that. The Plaintiff wanted to move in, but the Defendant barred her from doing that, and that's a breach. JM missed the part when the Defendant admitted she did not want "anybody" to know her address. What BS the Plaintiff had her father who could have helped her move in, she had no key. The Defendant just got away with a fraud.
@@lukerinderknecht2982right, “do you know where your child is?” lol ring any bells? These people have not been aware of their children’s safety too. Not just this generation.
Once again JM got this wrong. She can’t register the kid without the proof of address which was needed from the defendant!!! Come on JM are you so high on your throne that you forget that you have to show proof!!! The defendant refused to allow someone else bring her to move in, defendant said no! What happened to getting on the defendant about being in control over that…which prevented the plaintiff from moving in especially when she failed to go get the plaintiff and she admitted that she was IGNORING the calls and text. Horrible ruling!!!!
To provide proof of address, all you need to do is provide a lease, that's it. The thing the defendant signed was literally all the proof she needed to enroll her kid. Plus if you have a relative stranger saying "Hey, pick up my kid after school" after they've already started a bunch of drama, why would you respond to them, especially if they're texting while you're at work driving? She ignored a single text before the plaintiff said she wasn't gonna move on and started to demand her money back. Some of ya'll are proving why you should never be in charge of any legal matters if you ignore all the evidence because it upsets you.
Her ruling is base on the law. She can't just do whatever she want she follows the law. It not the landlord job to register your kid for the school if you move thst on you. She didn't deny her from moving in just to picking her up which is also fair. The problem is the plaintiff gave up all her rights that why your wording is very important she could had won if she didn't agree to everything. When asking for her dad to bring the stuff if she said no I need help and I need the key, than she would had won but since she agree to it at the time than it consider fair.
Wait..I figured judge was going to rule in the case of the defendant BUT by her threatening to send “soldiers” to her…the judge should have at least given the plaintiff half back
Actually she did stop her from moving!! She said she would pick her up and didn't, she gave her no key and she didn't want anyone else bringing her to the house. So was she going to move her in when she wanted to!?!
That wasn't something they agreed on, it was something they discussed. The plantiff had wanted the defendant to pick up her kid "any day I was at work" which the defendant said she wouldn't be able to and to fix her schedule. The plantiff already knew about not bringing people to the house before she signed the agreement. Literally none of these things were the defendant stopping her from moving in, they were things that was known before signing the contract and putting the deposit down. The plaintiff just wanted free childcare and when she couldn't, she backed out. There's a reason even her own family didn't want her around.
She couldn't even have her own dad come to the house to bring her belongings. I think the plaintiff is scammed, and she's probably done this before. I believe Michelle just didn't know any better. She should move somewhere where her daughter can catch a school bus. None of this makes sense.
@@Fribee83they discussed how the move-in would go. She was going to pick her and her things up. She didn't want anyone else moving her in. First red flag on the defendant's part. The plaintiff then wanted her to do extra on a drop-off/pickup for her Child's school. Red flag on the plaintiff's side. If the plaintiff never asked her to do the pickup/drop-off for the child I think we would be hearing JM ask her why she wouldn't return get money and calling her a scammer. I don't think she ever intended to let her move in. I've never had a landlord tell me who I can employ to move me and my things in.
@@aprilpinketon2567 Yes, all of that happened before she signed the contract. A landlord can say that you can't move in until the full moon because their psychic said that's a day of good fortune and you have the right to not live there. The plaintiff was just lazy and wanted free childcare and when she didn't get it, something the defendant never agreed to do, then she backs out. Weird how many people are siding with her for being so greedy.
Is this your weird way of flexing to us? Do you think people read your comment and say, "Oh man! That guy must be rich! I wish I was him!" FuqouttaherePunk
@@TopherGrant I'm an artist. I have struggled with finances. Until the local community college hired me to teach art. I know what it's like to be poor.
Unfair verdict. I don’t think the defendant ever intended to allow the plaintiff to move in. She was just giving her the run around. She deserved her money back.
I disagree with the judgment. Where was the address? The start date? The keys? 👀 The control on who can visit the home didn’t seem like a commercial arrangement 👀
😂😂 I thought same thing I use them at night to wrap hair not as a style in streets 😂 maybe she forgot or that piece was holding on for dear life and had no choice but to use it for support
I feel like she did take advantage of the plaintiff because her intelligence, but they both dodged a bullet because the cops was gonna be called a month later after move in 🤣 both of em crazy in their own way , should stayed car buddies .
I'd rather pay my parents rent and abide by their rules than to live with a stranger. If you are an adult, especially with a kid of your own, you should know that it costs to live. Water bill, electric, food....Why should your parents absorb the cost of your adult poor decisions? She basically admitted she wanted to move because her parents are charging.
Oh Lord. Please give out of your parents house. They failed you. Our jobs parents is to prepare our kids for their own life. I have 3 ranging from 24 to 29 they all have their own houses and full time jobs.
When she goes and pick her up. Don’t forget the landlord was suppose to got get her and bring her to the house. She probably wasn’t gonna never do it but the plaintiff didn’t wait and see, if the defendant was going to run off with her money. If she wouldn’t never respond to her request on what time she suppose to be picking her up to move in the plaintiff would’ve won her case. At that point she got scammed but she forfeited the lease when she asked her about her daughter and she didn’t respond back. Then the plaintiff requested her money back. Nope that’s not how it works the plaintiff Jump the g.u.n way too soon even tho I think the lady was scamming her. But legally the defendant has a alibi.
Unfortunately it doesn't matter, the contract was made... perhaps next time she should say, with this hand I give you a deposit and the other hand I take a key. 😊 Haha.
In the law, once she gave her the money the contract was made. That made it a legally binding contract (she COULD have told the deft. "when I pay you the money, I expect to get the key" which she could have put in text message, THEN she would have won, but she didn't do this.
She preyed on that girl. Learned about her life, where she lives and works. Meanwhile she succored 400 bucks for a room they may not even exist. The defendant is hustling with Uber and with people.
You saying “I’m not going to move in and I want my money back.” That’s you backing out. Also why are you making this woman responsible with picking up your kid? Then the defendant attitude was nasty! She didn’t have to respond like that.
Ghosting her after paying her money.... Not picking her up to move her in after saying you would and telling her you wont allow anyone else to move her in is denying her access.
The Lyfe-landlord is likely a psycho. Although she lost money, the plantiff dodged a bullet. It would have been very unpleasant living there. The red flag was when she told her she did not want her father helping her move in because she didnt want men around her house.
Instead of living with family, helping family pay bills, you decide to move out and help someone else’s family pay their bill? Make it make sense. 👩🏿⚖️
I know several people and I have friends and family that work for Uber. Not as drivers but for the actual company. Uber has a policy to never give you the same Uber driver twice for safety. With that being said. I think she was her Uber driver once and the defendant would probably help the plantiff out by giving her discounted rides. That way it was cheaper and the defendant got to keep the majority of her money. She planned on scamming the lady the whole time.
The defendant is very boojee and nasty and scammed tht lady out of her money she was running game had no attention in giving her a key just took her 400 hundred and she thinks she's cute because she's light skin yea she was going through things thts why she scammed her for her 400 the judge should have made her pay her back
Yeah, this one was over with in the 1st 2 minutes. The Plaintiff apparently thinks that everyone works for her, for free. Including her landlord!! 👀🙈🙈🙈
Seriously! So many comments are talking about how the plaintiff was this innocent victim. Nah, she wanted free childcare while she was at work. She was already getting a great deal on a room but she wanted her new landlord to pick up her kid after school? Good riddance.
@@Mongo76 Yea, she'd be at school and then she wanted the defendant to pick he rup from the bus stop any days the plantiff would be at work. I'm sure that's a foreign concept to you but that's called...childcare.
Its always difficult when ur renting a room or having flatmates that are practically strangers. I mean even when you live with fanily its difficult . I use to rent a room from a guy that was from Brazil. It was horrible he would have loud big huge parties and I'd start work at 7am and had to get up at 5:30 am . And sometimes he would put up to 5 people in one bedroom that had bunks in it. I could be sleeping in my room and in the middle of the night and he would knock on the door and there would be some girl or couple from south America needing a place to stay. It was horrible. Then no one would clean the shower it would get all slimy and yuck i use to clean it on my days off. I was so happy when i moved out .
I dont agree on this one. If defendant was making the move difficult instead of freely allowing the plaintiff to move in then its kinda on the defendant too.
The judge should have made her give it back. She purposely wouldn’t allow her to move on. She should have gotten a key when the scammer took her money.
The plaintiff didn't have a key from the landlord but was expected to move in? Do we even know if there was an actual place to move into? This could've been a bogus residence. How is this legit when no service was ever rendered? This was a complete scam upheld by law.🤦🏽♂
They both avoided future mishaps. One would be asking for more and more help and the other, if mad, would get the other beat up. At her age, threatening a mother with an 8 year old bodily harm with her "soldiers" should seek a professional to dig deeper into her issues. After 16, that crap is plain crazy. 16 and under only think they know better and are not life smart if they gang up. Besides, if you can't fight your own batyles, go sit down. Hahaha.
I feel like it's the landlord fault because she didn't allow the girls dad to move her things in because she didn't want men to know where she lived also she promised her that she will pick her up with her things it didn't happen so the landlord broke the deal not her it was just excuses to keep the woman's 400 dollars I think the landlord made a promise she couldn't keep as far as the child was concerned it would've been a straight no your her mom you have to figure that out
Only in America you can win money by people changing their mind on you... This is so ridiculous, what are the defendant's damages? Did she lose any rent that month? Was she even advertising the room for rent? It's so sad that she got to keep the money as a bonanza because I thought ''courts were not for that''... The plaintiff had no keys, not even a toothbrush in that home, and yet she's the one who lost her money because she changed her mind? Again, only in America...
Ok, if the law says that's a contract, then that's the law about a contract but I think Miss Plaintiff should have gotten the $200 for those threats. Sit your rude behind down "Miss" Defendant.
I missed something on this. How was there a contract when there was not a set move in date? The defendant did didnot give a product in return for $400. The plaintiff was trying to move in, and the defendant declined. The defendant started ghosting the plaintiff, threatening her and being mean. The defendant is also dishonest. The situation became toxic. In order for the plaintiff to register her daughter in school, she will need proof of residency. How can she proceed if she is being ghosted? She may have dodged a haystack of problems if she did move.
What are you talking about? The child wasn't a newborn when this happened. You don't know what her situation was then. People fall on hard times every single day. Whether they have kids or not.
@@Melaninatedbeauty43 And expect strangers to bend at their whim because they have a child…girl, bye. If she was grown enough to have a child, then she should’ve had somewhere stable to the child to live.
@@kamwilliams5541Her parents house was stable. Which is why she was able to back out the deal. She just didn’t want to live there anymore. And there are plenty of childless people without stability. Have you looked at the homeless rates? All these people living in their cars? That can happen to anybody. Even you.
The plaintiff seems a little off. The defendant took advantage, how can you tell someone that’s renting from you who can move their things in, or who they can’t over?
She should have gotten the $200 for threatening to send soldiers to her job. Defendant was a nasty person; once it didn’t work out, she could have given that woman her $400 back, it’s not like she was going to rent it to someone else. Karma will get her.
I think that the plaintiffs should have got in some type of money. Because she was threatened, you know, like. Once you threaten me, you talk about you gonna sing your people, your soldiers, your goons to my job. I have every right to protect myself. I have every right to fill some type of way. I feel scared and cool if I'm not talking to you. And that type of way. Also, you're being mad disrespectful. And at the end of the day, she should have got emotional distress from those sex messages to she's gonna send soldiers to her job. That is a place where she makes some money. That is a threat point blank period
Plaintiff, "can you pick up my kid, oh and she likes snacks and can you get my supper started, hey while you're at it can you take her to school every morning and I'll be going out on the weekends so do you want to just pick her up and let her hang out at your house?''
The defendant is wild, (and she answers questions that haven’t even been asked 😂), but I could tell almost immediately that the plaintiff is one of those people that you may try to do something for, but then, they want you to do *EVERYTHING* for them. The very personification of “Give them an inch, and they’ll take a mile”. Her asking this woman to pick up her child was 100% unreasonable, and she needs to learn that as that child’s mother, she has to do whatever she needs to do to make things work out in her favor.
Naw that lady know what she was doing poor girl you lost ya money but I know want know what was going to happen if she enter the house she was about the rent then it would’ve been a whole different story this is very sad case
Reminds me of when I helped a family of 4 to get back on their feet by lending them stay in a room but I didn’t expect anything in return. I helped mom register her kid for school and appointments but she helped out around the house. But sole responsibility is always parent first
JM is out of touch. The defendant never gave her a key and you need a letter from the defendant as a landlord to register kid in school. But JM don't understand, she like to talk not listen, that's why she didn't come a therapist. Because she talks not listen out of touch with the people. In my 1st amendment right opinion. Plaintiff thank God that your daughter and you didn't move with the defendant she has a nasty personality.
Plaintiff may have lost her deposit but she dodged a disgusting filthy nasty threatening bullet.
God knows, defendant is pure trash.
I thought the same !!!!
Yep
I can't stand black women who try to use black men to do their dirty work, because they can't act civilly. Then they sit back, go shopping and laugh as their men go to jail. This is why they stay single.
The defendant makes no sense. She ain’t help nobody but herself in this case. Don’t trust people who boast about how charitable they are. They the biggest scammers.
I agree! People that want to sincerely help others do not feel the need to announce it OR brag about it!!
Or how Christian they are
I agree!
She really gave her a "ride" to hell 😒
Right while they're receiving your money. Lol
she was trying to help her save money by not giving her back her money lol
😂😂
The defendant is lying-that lady was not harassing her@ girl bye!!
She keep moving this invisible hair out her face killing me
Right 😂😂😂😂😂
😂 for real, body language full of lies from the hair to the eyes. Every time she looked up a lie rolled out.
🤣🤣🤣🤣! To quote Alexander O’Neals hit song from back in the day.. “She’s ah Fake”!
This fake hair woman is a user!!!
Let her be great😅😅
She took advantage of that lady. Talking about she doesn't want anyone to know where she lives. And thats right; she never received a key
The plaintiff was too overbearing to a stranger. She didn’t know that woman from Eve but she wanted her to pick up and drop off her child?? The defendant is also crazy for trying to bring in a stranger into her home and expecting it to work out.
Maybe the stranger was manipulative and once she got the money she switched up
Yep. They're both "special" 😬
I DON'T BELIEVE THE DEFENDANT WAS GOING TO EVER HAVE HER MOVE IN SHE ROBBED THE PLAINTIFF. SHE SEEN THAT SOMETHING WAS A BIT OFF & SHE WAS IN A TIGHT SPOT DISGUSTING ACTIONS FROM THE DEFENDANT
It's attitude like that makes people go missing! She is putting her kids in danger
Right there is always another side of the story, no telling why she was in the situation that she was in prior.
The defendant has a dark energy
The plantiff tried to visit her problems on her landlord and then backed out on the deal when she didn't get free childcare.
Glad I'm not the only one that noticed that. Something about her eyes, man.
Yesss 👀 her whole aura
You’re probably an empath.
Yes tell me about it
The Defendant spewing absolute BS while trying to explain why she threatened to send "her soldiers" to the Plaintiff's workplace😂.
She's got "soldiers, " but none of those "soldiers " could help her pay her rent or get hair transplants for that balding left side of her head she's trying to disguise with that swoop hairpiece clip-on. I would've told her to send them and would've sent them to the next realm.
A real scum bag.
How can she move in with no key tho ? And the defendant has very dark energy the whole time” I’ll have my souljahs come to your job” ma’am that’s a threat . Plaintiff should’ve also sued for the threat . And she should’ve got paperwork don’t just give her money and then y’all aren’t even discussing everything via text they both said they would talk on the phone . Sad case
And who the hell is John? This was sounded less and less like an Uber driver and more like an organized business driver
@@mary5305j right !! Like a private drive for something whole thing is strange .
The problem is they didn't have a set date to hand over the key and the threat won't hold up in court.
@@mary5305jProbly an Uber driver who asked people to pay her on the side.
It was a game from day one! She preyed on this lady! I don’t want nobody to know where I live! If she’s renting, it’s where she lives also! Incredible!
Exactly; how did JM expect the plaintiff to move in with no key? The Defendant knew she was not letting her move in. Why would she refuse the Plaintiff's father from helping her move in? JM did not pay attention to the facts of the case
@@idiaakanbi3713 she is always switching up how she judges each case. Use to love her 😢
The plaintiff was really sweet and the defendant is nasty and has bad ju ju
that lady gave evil vibes the minute she walked in
Let the poor breathe, i feel for the plaintiff 💔
Right? She seems calm, like not an angry type of person, maybe too trusting bc she needs help, but still, that’s dangerous bc she has her child.
I think the judge got this one wrong , the Land Lord was real nice until she got the money , then she never answered her again . She took the lady money and run .
Nope she never told her she couldn’t move in. She never dined her access to the house. She just didn’t respond back to pick up and drop off of daughter. So the judge got it right lawfully.
Me too!
She didn't run. They didn't have a set date and didn't deny her from entering.
It was a game from jump. The Defendant knew she was never going to let the plaintiff move in. Picking up the child was not for free, and JM missed that. The Plaintiff wanted to move in, but the Defendant barred her from doing that, and that's a breach. JM missed the part when the Defendant admitted she did not want "anybody" to know her address. What BS the Plaintiff had her father who could have helped her move in, she had no key. The Defendant just got away with a fraud.
@idiaakanbi3713 Exactly 💯
I have never seen so many women just leaving their kids with any ol’ body in my life. I feel so bad for the kids these days.
Well, parents used to let their kids roam where they wanted to from sunrise to sundown.
That is literally not new at all.
@@lukerinderknecht2982right, “do you know where your child is?” lol ring any bells? These people have not been aware of their children’s safety too. Not just this generation.
@@tahdomm of course it’s not new but it was rare. Being a deadbeat mom is beginning to be a common trend today.
Once again JM got this wrong. She can’t register the kid without the proof of address which was needed from the defendant!!! Come on JM are you so high on your throne that you forget that you have to show proof!!! The defendant refused to allow someone else bring her to move in, defendant said no! What happened to getting on the defendant about being in control over that…which prevented the plaintiff from moving in especially when she failed to go get the plaintiff and she admitted that she was IGNORING the calls and text. Horrible ruling!!!!
Her rulings are often off.
To provide proof of address, all you need to do is provide a lease, that's it. The thing the defendant signed was literally all the proof she needed to enroll her kid. Plus if you have a relative stranger saying "Hey, pick up my kid after school" after they've already started a bunch of drama, why would you respond to them, especially if they're texting while you're at work driving? She ignored a single text before the plaintiff said she wasn't gonna move on and started to demand her money back. Some of ya'll are proving why you should never be in charge of any legal matters if you ignore all the evidence because it upsets you.
Her ruling is base on the law. She can't just do whatever she want she follows the law. It not the landlord job to register your kid for the school if you move thst on you. She didn't deny her from moving in just to picking her up which is also fair.
The problem is the plaintiff gave up all her rights that why your wording is very important she could had won if she didn't agree to everything. When asking for her dad to bring the stuff if she said no I need help and I need the key, than she would had won but since she agree to it at the time than it consider fair.
Wait..I figured judge was going to rule in the case of the defendant BUT by her threatening to send “soldiers” to her…the judge should have at least given the plaintiff half back
You’ve lost your mind. The woman SHOULD have given her money back, but she doesn’t have to by law. Plaintiff broke the contract.
Actually she did stop her from moving!! She said she would pick her up and didn't, she gave her no key and she didn't want anyone else bringing her to the house. So was she going to move her in when she wanted to!?!
That wasn't something they agreed on, it was something they discussed. The plantiff had wanted the defendant to pick up her kid "any day I was at work" which the defendant said she wouldn't be able to and to fix her schedule. The plantiff already knew about not bringing people to the house before she signed the agreement. Literally none of these things were the defendant stopping her from moving in, they were things that was known before signing the contract and putting the deposit down. The plaintiff just wanted free childcare and when she couldn't, she backed out. There's a reason even her own family didn't want her around.
Again, answer the question, how can you move in with no key?
She couldn't even have her own dad come to the house to bring her belongings. I think the plaintiff is scammed, and she's probably done this before. I believe Michelle just didn't know any better. She should move somewhere where her daughter can catch a school bus. None of this makes sense.
@@Fribee83they discussed how the move-in would go. She was going to pick her and her things up. She didn't want anyone else moving her in. First red flag on the defendant's part. The plaintiff then wanted her to do extra on a drop-off/pickup for her Child's school. Red flag on the plaintiff's side. If the plaintiff never asked her to do the pickup/drop-off for the child I think we would be hearing JM ask her why she wouldn't return get money and calling her a scammer. I don't think she ever intended to let her move in. I've never had a landlord tell me who I can employ to move me and my things in.
@@aprilpinketon2567 Yes, all of that happened before she signed the contract. A landlord can say that you can't move in until the full moon because their psychic said that's a day of good fortune and you have the right to not live there. The plaintiff was just lazy and wanted free childcare and when she didn't get it, something the defendant never agreed to do, then she backs out. Weird how many people are siding with her for being so greedy.
Defendant took that woman money knowing full well she wasn't about to "help" her. Scam
$400. is important to some people
Is this your weird way of flexing to us? Do you think people read your comment and say, "Oh man! That guy must be rich! I wish I was him!"
FuqouttaherePunk
Yess, most people are sadly one paycheck away from losing everything..its sad. Very difficult nowadays with prices of everything 💔💔
@@TopherGrant I'm an artist. I have struggled with finances.
Until the local community college hired me to teach art.
I know what it's like to be poor.
True.
Unfair verdict. I don’t think the defendant ever intended to allow the plaintiff to move in. She was just giving her the run around. She deserved her money back.
I disagree with the judgment. Where was the address? The start date? The keys? 👀 The control on who can visit the home didn’t seem like a commercial arrangement 👀
She should have never givin her money away to agree to things she didn’t know
She dodged a major bullet. The defensnt is pure evil.
Plaintiff apparently DIDN’T have a clue EITHER BEFORE OR AFTER COURT!!
The Defendant has those silver clips that you use for hair rollers at the top of her hair. WHY???😂
I wouldn't have noticed, great catch 😂 I swear they must not have mirrors backstage
Hood buggar
To hold the weave on her head😂
😂😂 I thought same thing I use them at night to wrap hair not as a style in streets 😂 maybe she forgot or that piece was holding on for dear life and had no choice but to use it for support
@@Black0bsidianThose are clips for when you are getting your hair done.
I feel like she did take advantage of the plaintiff because her intelligence, but they both dodged a bullet because the cops was gonna be called a month later after move in 🤣 both of em crazy in their own way , should stayed car buddies .
How can the judge say she was renting the place when she didn't even have a key??
I'd rather pay my parents rent and abide by their rules than to live with a stranger. If you are an adult, especially with a kid of your own, you should know that it costs to live. Water bill, electric, food....Why should your parents absorb the cost of your adult poor decisions? She basically admitted she wanted to move because her parents are charging.
She has low vibrational energy
Oh Lord. Please give out of your parents house. They failed you. Our jobs parents is to prepare our kids for their own life. I have 3 ranging from 24 to 29 they all have their own houses and full time jobs.
Agreed !!!
@@mitulu74 I'm sure your momma is proud of how independent you are !
@TopherGrant The point was all of this happened just because she didn't want to pay her parents and it backfired. My comment was hypothetical.
This judge needs to listen sometimes she DIDNT GIVE HER A KEY! Meaning how is she suppose to move in?! Smh
When she goes and pick her up. Don’t forget the landlord was suppose to got get her and bring her to the house. She probably wasn’t gonna never do it but the plaintiff didn’t wait and see, if the defendant was going to run off with her money. If she wouldn’t never respond to her request on what time she suppose to be picking her up to move in the plaintiff would’ve won her case. At that point she got scammed but she forfeited the lease when she asked her about her daughter and she didn’t respond back. Then the plaintiff requested her money back. Nope that’s not how it works the plaintiff Jump the g.u.n way too soon even tho I think the lady was scamming her. But legally the defendant has a alibi.
Unfortunately it doesn't matter, the contract was made... perhaps next time she should say, with this hand I give you a deposit and the other hand I take a key. 😊 Haha.
I agree .. did the judge miss the fact she never gave her a key?? And why wasn’t the plaintiff making that fact clearer?
In the law, once she gave her the money the contract was made. That made it a legally binding contract (she COULD have told the deft. "when I pay you the money, I expect to get the key" which she could have put in text message, THEN she would have won, but she didn't do this.
It’s a deposit! Not first months rent. The fact that she didn’t have a key is irrelevant.
Defendant preyed on a helpless needy soul.
The defendant is a scammer.
Sums everything up. JM don't know a scam when it's sitting right there in her face.
The defendant clearly knew the plaintiff was easily manipulated and after the 1st if she wasnt in there the money should have gone back
She preyed on that girl. Learned about her life, where she lives and works. Meanwhile she succored 400 bucks for a room they may not even exist. The defendant is hustling with Uber and with people.
You saying “I’m not going to move in and I want my money back.” That’s you backing out.
Also why are you making this woman responsible with picking up your kid?
Then the defendant attitude was nasty! She didn’t have to respond like that.
Ghosting her after paying her money.... Not picking her up to move her in after saying you would and telling her you wont allow anyone else to move her in is denying her access.
The defendant left her bob clip on her hair😂
The defendant was the “b” not the plaintiff …what an pos
The Lyfe-landlord is likely a psycho. Although she lost money, the plantiff dodged a bullet. It would have been very unpleasant living there. The red flag was when she told her she did not want her father helping her move in because she didnt want men around her house.
Girl what should we wear for the people's court??!? In unison FLANNEL 😂
😂😂😂😂
Iv seen worse on this show atleast all her parts were covered!
Can't go wrong with flannel
Nothing wrong with flannel they looked nice
Evil wins again.
Only temporary victory vengeance is mine I'll repay says the Lord"
She keep swooping that clip on bang it's killing me lol
Is that the big silver clip on top of her pointy head?
@@TopherGrantlmfaooo “pointy head”!!
I hope she reads these comments 😂
She brushed back her imagination and topped her creation with a fake bang. 😂
Instead of living with family, helping family pay bills, you decide to move out and help someone else’s family pay their bill? Make it make sense. 👩🏿⚖️
she said what she would be paying the defendant would be less than she was paying and she could save
Hell sometimes _"family"_ will do you worse than strangers
Honey! Sometimes you moved away from *”Family“* so someone doesn’t end up in jail and/or in the morgue.
The defendant was kind of nasty.
Ya think?😟
I know several people and I have friends and family that work for Uber. Not as drivers but for the actual company. Uber has a policy to never give you the same Uber driver twice for safety. With that being said. I think she was her Uber driver once and the defendant would probably help the plantiff out by giving her discounted rides. That way it was cheaper and the defendant got to keep the majority of her money. She planned on scamming the lady the whole time.
The defendant is very boojee and nasty and scammed tht lady out of her money she was running game had no attention in giving her a key just took her 400 hundred and she thinks she's cute because she's light skin yea she was going through things thts why she scammed her for her 400 the judge should have made her pay her back
Yeah, this one was over with in the 1st 2 minutes.
The Plaintiff apparently thinks that everyone works for her, for free. Including her landlord!! 👀🙈🙈🙈
Seriously! So many comments are talking about how the plaintiff was this innocent victim. Nah, she wanted free childcare while she was at work. She was already getting a great deal on a room but she wanted her new landlord to pick up her kid after school? Good riddance.
@@Fribee83 Free Childcare? HOW ? The child would be in school.
@@Mongo76 Yea, she'd be at school and then she wanted the defendant to pick he rup from the bus stop any days the plantiff would be at work. I'm sure that's a foreign concept to you but that's called...childcare.
@@Fribee83 OK
She took that woman's money with no intention of letting her move in.
That's asking a hell of a lot from somebody you're just renting a room from. 🤦
Its always difficult when ur renting a room or having flatmates that are practically strangers. I mean even when you live with fanily its difficult . I use to rent a room from a guy that was from Brazil. It was horrible he would have loud big huge parties and I'd start work at 7am and had to get up at 5:30 am . And sometimes he would put up to 5 people in one bedroom that had bunks in it. I could be sleeping in my room and in the middle of the night and he would knock on the door and there would be some girl or couple from south America needing a place to stay. It was horrible. Then no one would clean the shower it would get all slimy and yuck i use to clean it on my days off. I was so happy when i moved out .
I dont agree on this one. If defendant was making the move difficult instead of freely allowing the plaintiff to move in then its kinda on the defendant too.
Yep and it was already past the first of the month. She should have had access to the place or at least a key. Smh
The hair clips!🥴💀😅😂
😂😂 holding up them hair pieces
The judge should have made her give it back. She purposely wouldn’t allow her to move on. She should have gotten a key when the scammer took her money.
Exactly
The plaintiff didn't have a key from the landlord but was expected to move in? Do we even know if there was an actual place to move into? This could've been a bogus residence. How is this legit when no service was ever rendered? This was a complete scam upheld by law.🤦🏽♂
They both avoided future mishaps. One would be asking for more and more help and the other, if mad, would get the other beat up. At her age, threatening a mother with an 8 year old bodily harm with her "soldiers" should seek a professional to dig deeper into her issues. After 16, that crap is plain crazy. 16 and under only think they know better and are not life smart if they gang up. Besides, if you can't fight your own batyles, go sit down. Hahaha.
I feel like it's the landlord fault because she didn't allow the girls dad to move her things in because she didn't want men to know where she lived also she promised her that she will pick her up with her things it didn't happen so the landlord broke the deal not her it was just excuses to keep the woman's 400 dollars I think the landlord made a promise she couldn't keep as far as the child was concerned it would've been a straight no your her mom you have to figure that out
Sounded like the defendant was a pimp or working for a pimp. Would like to know more about this “John” and their “soldiers”
People gotta grow up…
Let her keep it, you dodged a bullet.
I’m with the plaintiff. That defendant was the one who changed her mind. She’s a phoney.
I bet you're related to her 😂
Only in America you can win money by people changing their mind on you... This is so ridiculous, what are the defendant's damages? Did she lose any rent that month? Was she even advertising the room for rent? It's so sad that she got to keep the money as a bonanza because I thought ''courts were not for that''... The plaintiff had no keys, not even a toothbrush in that home, and yet she's the one who lost her money because she changed her mind? Again, only in America...
You sound Jealous
Ok, if the law says that's a contract, then that's the law about a contract but I think Miss Plaintiff should have gotten the $200 for those threats. Sit your rude behind down "Miss" Defendant.
Dont mess with the defendant, she got soldiers. A real woman takes care of her own problems.
This is why you should never take on the problems of other people. Theirs become yours...
her father couldn’t drop her off… The defendant is nuts. She planned on scamming not thinking she’d sue.
The defendant is wrong for with holding the plaintiff's deposit. Who cares if she made charitable donations.🙄
I missed something on this. How was there a contract when there was not a set move in date? The defendant did didnot give a product in return for $400. The plaintiff was trying to move in, and the defendant declined. The defendant started ghosting the plaintiff, threatening her and being mean. The defendant is also dishonest. The situation became toxic. In order for the plaintiff to register her daughter in school, she will need proof of residency. How can she proceed if she is being ghosted? She may have dodged a haystack of problems if she did move.
The dependent reminds me of this woman that lives in my building. She gives off a negative and mean vibe.
Michelle was my friend we grew up on the same street...she passed away from a car accident may she rest in peace 🙏🏽
Ouch 😖 the defendant won. Give her the dough back. It's a red flag once a parent mentions their kid being picked up. Take yo money back and scram 👉🏽🚪
The defendant has a dark soul. Glad the plaintiff dodged her for $400
The plaintiff has a very low vibrations, they apparently bonded over that struggle life unfortunately the plaintiff has to learn the hard way. 👩🏿⚖️
The plaintiff is slow slow
Good she wasn't on judge Mathis he would call her a crackhead she do look a little high
If a young woman doesn’t have anything else to her name, she’s going to have a child. The only one I feel sorry for is the child. 😒
What are you talking about? The child wasn't a newborn when this happened.
You don't know what her situation was then. People fall on hard times every single day. Whether they have kids or not.
@@Melaninatedbeauty43 And expect strangers to bend at their whim because they have a child…girl, bye. If she was grown enough to have a child, then she should’ve had somewhere stable to the child to live.
@@kamwilliams5541Her parents house was stable. Which is why she was able to back out the deal. She just didn’t want to live there anymore. And there are plenty of childless people without stability. Have you looked at the homeless rates? All these people living in their cars? That can happen to anybody. Even you.
That defendant knew what she was doing she's a scammer
She said it exactly right “ I was trying to keep them from saving money “ the devil is evil people !!! Not its own entity
The plaintiff seems a little off. The defendant took advantage, how can you tell someone that’s renting from you who can move their things in, or who they can’t over?
Judge Milan needs to shut up and listen some times, she robbed this lady for her money and Judge Milan really dropped the ball on this one.!
She should have gotten the $200 for threatening to send soldiers to her job. Defendant was a nasty person; once it didn’t work out, she could have given that woman her $400 back, it’s not like she was going to rent it to someone else. Karma will get her.
Definitely, she'll lose more than that real soon!!! 🙏🏾
The Judge passed judgement too early which clouded her judgement. She got this case wrong.
She should have given the money back. Just wrong.
The defendant is evil….no reason to be nasty like that.
I don’t think that lady ever intended to help her…
I think that the plaintiffs should have got in some type of money. Because she was threatened, you know, like. Once you threaten me, you talk about you gonna sing your people, your soldiers, your goons to my job. I have every right to protect myself. I have every right to fill some type of way. I feel scared and cool if I'm not talking to you. And that type of way. Also, you're being mad disrespectful. And at the end of the day, she should have got emotional distress from those sex messages to she's gonna send soldiers to her job. That is a place where she makes some money. That is a threat point blank period
If im paying rent, im bringing friends and family to visit.
Plaintiff, "can you pick up my kid, oh and she likes snacks and can you get my supper started, hey while you're at it can you take her to school every morning and I'll be going out on the weekends so do you want to just pick her up and let her hang out at your house?''
Looks like defendant is auditioning for a show.
Whoa!! those text messages....NASTY WORK!!! It's clear she thought she was better than the plaintiff!!
The defendant is wild, (and she answers questions that haven’t even been asked 😂), but I could tell almost immediately that the plaintiff is one of those people that you may try to do something for, but then, they want you to do *EVERYTHING* for them. The very personification of “Give them an inch, and they’ll take a mile”. Her asking this woman to pick up her child was 100% unreasonable, and she needs to learn that as that child’s mother, she has to do whatever she needs to do to make things work out in her favor.
How DOES one move in without a key ? 🤦🏽♀️ they deserve to know how that feels if they think this is okay
The defendant pulled a Nicki Minaj on the plaintiff. Don't make me send my goons 😂😂😂
The defendant 😍😍 those devil eyes😁
And devil mannerisms.
💯 dark energy felt through the screen
Upload the 2001 episodes when judge Milian first started
exactly how did she get the same Uber driver twice ? That lady is a stalker and I’m glad she didn’t move in that room .
You don’t give her no money if she’s not giving you a key
This Uber driver is threatening, aggressive and horrible. The Plantiff is looking for a childminder
August 28th was also my nieces birthday and she was also bitten in the face by a dog. Weird.
Naw that lady know what she was doing poor girl you lost ya money but I know want know what was going to happen if she enter the house she was about the rent then it would’ve been a whole different story this is very sad case
Accountability is the word of the day folks!
Reminds me of when I helped a family of 4 to get back on their feet by lending them stay in a room but I didn’t expect anything in return. I helped mom register her kid for school and appointments but she helped out around the house. But sole responsibility is always parent first
She really doesn't know her to be trusting her child with her
Too fine to have that nasty attitude.
JM is out of touch. The defendant never gave her a key and you need a letter from the defendant as a landlord to register kid in school. But JM don't understand, she like to talk not listen, that's why she didn't come a therapist. Because she talks not listen out of touch with the people. In my 1st amendment right opinion. Plaintiff thank God that your daughter and you didn't move with the defendant she has a nasty personality.