Sarvarkar and Hindutva: Irfan Habib, Nilanjan Mukhopadyay Speaks To Rahul Kanwal |

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 924

  • @raghavtrehan4590
    @raghavtrehan4590 5 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Vikram Sampath should have been here

    • @Kuldeepsingh-vm7lo
      @Kuldeepsingh-vm7lo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Now again discussion requires with vikram sampath these left liberal will say there are various figures in Indian freedom

    • @sangramkale3375
      @sangramkale3375 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then his second edition of book had not came. He became famous after the 2nd boom

    • @sureshshinde2013
      @sureshshinde2013 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sir,, Vikram Sampat is Very Honest writer. Born after the General Election 2014. His Pen n Spectical is from Delhi Shop.. Some more Vikram Sampat are in Q to take Birth.

    • @deeppant05
      @deeppant05 ปีที่แล้ว

      totally. Desh Ratan Nigam is a weak and non-assertive debator and clearly failed to articualate the facts and was outshouted by both the left libral panel including the biased anchor

  • @mandarpeshwe1994
    @mandarpeshwe1994 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Bhagat Singh called Savarkar a 'veer' in his writings. Gandhi called Savarkar as Brother. Honesty is the best policy.

    • @sanchardarshan
      @sanchardarshan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      झूठ है

    • @hamdardboy
      @hamdardboy ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Moreover my conversion to the constitutional line would bring back all those misled young men in India and abroad who were once looking up to me as their guide. I am ready to serve the Government in any capacity they like, for as my conversion is conscientious so I hope my future conduct would be. By keeping me in jail nothing can be got in comparison to what would be otherwise.
      The Mighty alone can afford to be merciful and therefore where else can the prodigal son return but to the parental doors of the Government?
      Hoping your Honour will kindly take into notion these points.
      VD savarkar letter to british

    • @ShivamSharma-dd1wf
      @ShivamSharma-dd1wf ปีที่แล้ว

      Please share the source of this. Thank you in advance.

  • @venugopalraochichula7534
    @venugopalraochichula7534 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Time and again I feel startling why Mr Ashutosh has been involved in intellectual debates. In each and every debate he speaks illogical and non-sense. It’s evident, from his perspectives of debates, he’s a stooge of Nehruvian Congress and Nehru family. The other panelists are trying to push their agenda there’s no wrong in it. But, Ashutosh is known as an absurd and idiotic. I know many of people who mute the video whenever Ashutosh starts speaking.

    • @gautamgangulyguwahati9717
      @gautamgangulyguwahati9717 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's a historical truth that Savarkar was a changed man after he came out of Andaman jail. Savarkar did not participate in Indian freedom struggle. In fact, he befriended British. He helped British to recruit youths against freedom struggle.
      These are historical facts .

  • @alokvarde6979
    @alokvarde6979 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Aushtosh is very important ingredient of any debate and is invited as comedian.

    • @syedzahid313
      @syedzahid313 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mercy petitions as strategy to get out of jail ...ha ha ha. Fooling the Nation, especially the andh bhakts.

    • @akb0014
      @akb0014 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No.. Its nigam the comedian

    • @chinmaya021
      @chinmaya021 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@syedzahid313 From where You get this, Mercy petition really?? It is a simple petition just like you apply for bail. Still He did not get freedom from Kalapani. Have you visited Kala Pani?? Have you seen the cells? It's not like Gandhiji's sentence to Yervada Jail? Who went to Kalapani, Do you have any list? no-one from Congress except One? I think you also don't have his name. His name was Yogendra Shukla.

    • @RaviRanjan-pp4gt
      @RaviRanjan-pp4gt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@syedzahid313 istrah to Gandhi Nehru yesab to British Ka dalal hua..qki unhe normal jail bheja Gaya..aur savarkar ko Kala paani...Whataboutery savi ko krna aata hai..

  • @anukreddi
    @anukreddi 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    @42:22 While, Savarkar may have praised the Nazi's, and compared Indian Muslims to the Jews who wouldn't integrate into German society. The fact is that Muslims of India proved him right by breaking away from India and forming Pakistan. The Muslims of India, at that time, broadly aren't the Muslims of India today. So, what he said would be factually correct, and while we judge the actions of the Nazi's for the atrocities of the Holocaust, Sarvarkar could not have expected that.

  • @svsnmurthy2227
    @svsnmurthy2227 5 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    Left leaning people are impatient and left leaning media organisation is giving more time to them

    • @SKsupesdmr
      @SKsupesdmr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Subhash Chandra Bose, bhagat Singh ,periyar ,Azad and many more were leftist ...first learn about this then talk ...

    • @smtkumar007
      @smtkumar007 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      if someone has a problem and made up their mind then better shit to republic tv for such debate

    • @trick_er
      @trick_er 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is left and right?

  • @JK-lc1ve
    @JK-lc1ve 5 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Do a similar program on Gandhiji’s mistakes if you have daring India Today 🤷🏻‍♀️
    Disgusting someone is talking about Sawarkar in that way...

    • @brazilbiba6671
      @brazilbiba6671 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did Gandhi make any mistakes? He was a good soul surely.

    • @PseudoProphet
      @PseudoProphet 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@brazilbiba6671 gandi used to call black African people as subhumans, he also served in the British army.

    • @brazilbiba6671
      @brazilbiba6671 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      That is surprising, almost seems out of character.

    • @PseudoProphet
      @PseudoProphet 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brazilbiba6671 exactly.

    • @johngates2602
      @johngates2602 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What wrong with this people who compare Savarkar to Gandhi ji.
      Really shame.

  • @viveksnambiar
    @viveksnambiar 5 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    While Rahul calls himself the moderator, invited 3 members against the idea of Savarkar....also gives more time for those people but stopping the person who speaks for savarkar.....is it fair ..is it the way true moderator behaves?? Infact all he speaks is against savarkar.....Then why this debate...he should have wrote his views in India today editorial section....rather than this cheap show...

    • @gagan_sikhi
      @gagan_sikhi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bhai right wing k log padhe likhe bohot km mile hain.. 90% to whatsApp university wale chacha rehty hain
      No offense

    • @sachithrao6353
      @sachithrao6353 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@gagan_sikhi bhai most left wing are communists and Gandhi(bc) lovers

    • @navintiwari112
      @navintiwari112 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gagan_sikhi beta tum bhut padhe likhe ho... wiki page sei aage gaadi nahin badhi hogi tumhari... tum jaison sei bhut debate hui hai...aadhe ghante mein bhagte nazar aate ho

  • @AnkitGupta-re4tp
    @AnkitGupta-re4tp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    when bose told gandhi about his plan of armed movement by creating INA,it was a brilliant idea as british would be busy in fighting world war and would not be able to sustain a fight against INA if indian men would have not joined British forces, still gandhi rejected it infact gandhi and congress went against bose and INA. but nobody doubts gandhi's intensions, why?

  • @AryaNirman
    @AryaNirman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Ambedkar was also not fighting for freedom he was also doing social service

    • @aryanpandey8262
      @aryanpandey8262 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      British stooge 🎉

  • @harrybv
    @harrybv 5 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    Why does a proven liar like Habib get invited to talk. Sad.

    • @sandeepsingh-by4db
      @sandeepsingh-by4db 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      answer is simple because he is liar.

    • @cooldudeimr
      @cooldudeimr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      just like desh ratan nigam and all rss liars do 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @sandeepsingh-by4db
      @sandeepsingh-by4db 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cooldudeimr what a jhandu person u are.

    • @cooldudeimr
      @cooldudeimr 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sandeepsingh-by4db hahahaha..... kyu Yeh rss deshdrohiyo ka saath dete ho

    • @sandeepsingh-by4db
      @sandeepsingh-by4db 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@cooldudeimr if u have any proof jut go to the court. otherwise no need to bark doggy boy.

  • @suchetharao1060
    @suchetharao1060 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Savarkar was targeted by the British because he was a bright intellectual! Irfan habib calls himself a historian and he doesn’t know the biography of Veer Savarkar, and doesn’t want to know it now either!!!

  • @saali8221
    @saali8221 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Arguments by Mr Nigam to defend Savarkar are his pure imagination like his arguments about Delhi's Jama Masjid not being a Masjid built by Mughals which I heard in a TV debate.

  • @rks2366
    @rks2366 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Jawaharlal Nehru was so great freedom fighter that he never went to Kalapani .

    • @pkk5612
      @pkk5612 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Same for Gandhi as well.

    • @donupadhyay1555
      @donupadhyay1555 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pkk5612 Ambedkar as well he never sent to Jail by British

    • @nitikakolnad8465
      @nitikakolnad8465 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In 2 weeks Motilal ji wrote a mercy petition for Nehru ji's release from Nabha jail 😂😂😂

  • @tejasghangrekar1423
    @tejasghangrekar1423 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Savarkar talked about hindus and muslims ...bcz he nd only he had a vision of what the picture of india would look like after 40 to 50 yrs .......nd let the leftist think tanks say anything savarkar will always remain a hero for india
    ..nd one and only one of his kind ...no one can be compared to his stature ...simply uncomparable

    • @AnarchistDoc
      @AnarchistDoc ปีที่แล้ว

      Savarkar will never be a hero..

  • @aniketaggarwal1224
    @aniketaggarwal1224 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    44:00 Unlike Bose , Savarkar was a prolific writer too . Therefore writing was also one of his weapon and he praised Nazi Germany for that purpose only .

  • @SparshAgarwalBCL
    @SparshAgarwalBCL 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    How dare you use a word like coward in introducing the biggest Braveheart of Bharat VEER Savarkar.

    • @monikabansal2312
      @monikabansal2312 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He was biggest coward and hypocrite just like nehru indra and rajeev...

    • @kgdkgd4170
      @kgdkgd4170 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      वीर वो होता है जो लढते लढते मरे या जो लढाई जितें
      सावरकर तो 1924 मे ही लढाई छोडी तो कैसे वीर?

    • @TheKukun123
      @TheKukun123 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oyee, VIT ka hai kya beyM

    • @sudhanshusrivastava1969
      @sudhanshusrivastava1969 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@monikabansal2312 just read his history correctly

  • @bknmd7
    @bknmd7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    He was restricted only upto Ratnagiri iff he escapes he would resent to kala pani,because his improsknment is for 50 years..
    Then he could not serve the nation anyhow therefore 2nd phase was that he did

  • @shikhamurali9876
    @shikhamurali9876 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    It’s clear Tak channel wants to prove Vir Savarkar doesn’t deserve Bharat Ratna. Big or small his contribution in freedom fight is undeniable. He will get BR whether Rahuls like it or not 😁

    • @Tatpunjiya
      @Tatpunjiya ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He was jailed for 20 years, spent less than half the term apologised 5 times in row, begged and pleaded and came out. He’s Bharat Ratna?

    • @cloudless_night
      @cloudless_night ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@Tatpunjiya snap out of your ignorance.
      Don't just pour the leftist propaganda here in comments.
      Read the explanation given on apologies by Vikram Sampath and make your mind by reading both sides.

  • @prabhaskumarmohanty5910
    @prabhaskumarmohanty5910 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Ajeeb baat h! Even most people don't know who these people are but criticizing savarkar who went to kalapaani

    • @faiqagaur5077
      @faiqagaur5077 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Mafi kyon maang li
      Pension BHI liya angrezo Ka veer Nahi kayar tha wo kutta nalayak tha

    • @prabhaskumarmohanty5910
      @prabhaskumarmohanty5910 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@faiqagaur5077 maharastra me savarkar hero h..bhai hinduo ko gaali dena h toh do..but ye savarkar ko beech me lane ki jaroorat nhi.

    • @faiqagaur5077
      @faiqagaur5077 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@prabhaskumarmohanty5910
      Bhayi Mai Kisi ko Gali Nahi deta Hindu Mera bada bhayi hai
      I love hindu but hate RSS BJP bajrangdal ABVP vhp

    • @prabhaskumarmohanty5910
      @prabhaskumarmohanty5910 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@faiqagaur5077 bhai..dekho yaar...thoda history padhoge toh pata lagega ye saare political parties cong bjp including owasi aur waqf board saare apne faida ke liye kaam kar rahe h. Lekin yaar Muslim h toh Bharat h nhi toh bina musalman ke Bharat ka koi matlab nhi.

    • @faiqagaur5077
      @faiqagaur5077 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@prabhaskumarmohanty5910
      Kaise

  • @hakkabukka5900
    @hakkabukka5900 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    1:05:25 good answer by Nigam. Foolish question by Rahul.

  • @deveshsawant3066
    @deveshsawant3066 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    What was the contribution of left on freedom struggle?

    • @svsnmurthy2227
      @svsnmurthy2227 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes sir you raised an imp question

    • @satishchauhan4191
      @satishchauhan4191 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Zero

    • @SaddamHussain-bu5cl
      @SaddamHussain-bu5cl 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Heard of bhagat singh and netaji sunash chandra bose ???????
      Read about HSRA and AIFB

    • @sujitmitrakrittikamitra9421
      @sujitmitrakrittikamitra9421 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      1946 naval mutiny they raised red flag. Chattogram armoury case most of them belong to left ideology. Hear about meerut conspiracy case. Perhaps you hear the name of laxmi sehegwal. Read about our freedom struggle.

    • @mohammadsaquibalam1076
      @mohammadsaquibalam1076 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Comrade Bhagat Singh founded the HSRA , read his writing "Why I am an Athiest?"

  • @rajanm3572
    @rajanm3572 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    How Veer Sawarkar, who gave him Veer ? only Sawarkar always sawarkar.....

    • @gsmukherjee7437
      @gsmukherjee7437 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You know there is no Hati in Hatibagan of Kolkata. Also there is no Bag in Bagbazar of Kolkata; there is no Tiger in Tiger gate of Bombay !!

    • @harir6316
      @harir6316 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      At least he did not sell himself for a rice bag.

    • @dilipthombre4806
      @dilipthombre4806 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Rajan Mathew
      how many fromyour
      fore fathers
      had fought against
      british and jailed in Andaman ???
      just give single name from your family
      if not then dont
      speak about sawarkar
      if you can not respect
      his devotion
      donot dare to
      insult

    • @petersunny4481
      @petersunny4481 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dilipthombre4806 that jail had other people also right or whether it was made only for sawarkar?
      If there were other people also whether they were treated like kings over there and only sawarkar was treated badly. Where is you logic sir.. It is you who is insulting all those freedom fighters who where sent to same jail and those people died over there never surrender to British.
      ..
      Freedom fight is completely different from Hindutva concept. Do not mix those two.

    • @dilipthombre4806
      @dilipthombre4806 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@petersunny4481
      how many from your family
      were fighting against
      british
      when swa sawarkar was in jail??
      and whom given you right to ask question about swa sawarkar?
      how he should fight?what should be his diplomacy in revolutionary fight?
      how many freedom fightets were convicted for 50 yrs jail?
      ask this question to your forefathers where were they?
      sawarkar is opposed & insulted because
      his ideaology
      but it was bitter truth proven during partition
      and in 1990
      he was not only
      revolutionary freedomfighter but
      leader and thinker also!!
      i respect M K Gandhi
      & swa.sawarkar
      equally
      although their way of struggle was different
      and idealogy too.
      but
      harsh truth about
      KHILAPAT MOVEMENT & MOPALLA RIOTS
      wriiten by sawarkar
      is cause of hate.
      we had not learned till today.
      you can hate him
      for his ideaology
      good luck
      because you dont know your blood relationship with most of hindus
      after conversion by portugeej long ago....
      go through historical perspective.
      you have not read lierature of sawarkar

  • @pragasamramaswamy1592
    @pragasamramaswamy1592 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    AGREED Mr NIGAM WITH ONE CLARIFICATION. SAVARKAR DID THE TACTICS OF APOLOGY. NOT TO INTENSIFY THE FREEDOM STRUGGLE. BUT ONLY TO ESCAPE FROM THE PAIN OF CONFINEMENT IN THE JAIL. RIGHT?

    • @reggieinindia
      @reggieinindia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This Anchor is out of place. He is behaving like a High School Debate Moderator

  • @praveenkushwaha9723
    @praveenkushwaha9723 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Why Rahul always interrupt right sided person

    • @mahak666
      @mahak666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      मैं तो यही कहूंगा कि... राहुल... Bas... rd है।

    • @suryashaw3906
      @suryashaw3906 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bcz you right hand is used to do auspicious work and left for saach

  • @貴方の愛
    @貴方の愛 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    @13:50 "...So many heroes of the India's freedom movement wee written out of India's history books deliberately so..."
    So, the Sangh started to rewrite the Indian history that few cowards & anti-nationals could be included as freedom fighters while their record is exactly opposite.

    • @akshatlahane6962
      @akshatlahane6962 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cowards like Sayyad Ahmad Khan , Maulana Azad , Four Lakh students of AMU who campaigned for Pakistan ??

  • @maheshkumarrao5812
    @maheshkumarrao5812 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Absolutely right, the Left Group never add in our school history, any freedom fighter who where against their ideologies.
    Even Left dorsnot like Subhash Chandra Bose , Savarkar n Lokmanya Tilak.
    That is we have rewrite our history , Left more interested in adding China n Russia Communist , rather India freedom fighter who ideologies deferent that Left Communist.
    One big example is Indo China war , Left Communist supported China.
    They never think that India is their nation, the nationalism is zero to them.

    • @RiyaSharma-ox5ev
      @RiyaSharma-ox5ev 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That is because it is controversial to write about people who were supporters of Facist intentions to wipe out a whole race of Jews.
      In this day and age, frankly, supporting people like that can't be justified. Now you may come to me with the argument that this is presentist, but even judging by the ethical and moral standards of the time (1930s and 1940s) , mass murder of any race was not justified.
      So, personally, I believe knowledge about radicals such as Bose, Savarkar and Tilak are important, but textbooks DEFINITELY SHOULD NOT endorse their perspectives.

  • @mangomits
    @mangomits 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Can't believe folks talking disrespectfully about someone who spent 1/3 of his life in British Jail..

    • @chickwit2575
      @chickwit2575 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He also spent the rest of his life being silent against the British, he wrote many apology letters, lived off of their pension and money.

    • @786humaira1
      @786humaira1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      After jail at Andaman he became a Hindu agent of British sarvarkar. He attacked Mahatma Gandhi and the Muslims. British were afraid of Mahatmas movement and the Muslims.The typical way of British arrest a man with long term jail punishment then show liniency if you do our dirty work.
      And Savarkar was very dutifully loyal to British and helped to snuff off the worlds greatest man of his time Mahatma Gandhi. The son of India, the greatest man the world has seen.
      It is so foolish not to be able to know how poisonous Savarkar was and his ideology was.

    • @786humaira1
      @786humaira1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Savalkar also received Rs.60 / month to do the dirty job of the British.and he did it well.

    • @mangomits
      @mangomits 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All seem to be expert about 100+ old history.. No iota of common sense about their circumstances, vision, ground reality etc.. Indian media has brain washed two groups against each other so much so that those groups have become fanatics about everything & anything except how to improve it's own transport infrastructure, medical facilities, education systems, gender equality, social hygiene etc.. These the media n these groups will never discuss but yes will talk about 1000 years old incidents about their sky gods n which one was better than the other is all the discussions are about. Typical to keep the 3rd world folks stuck in their deep holes.

    • @harir6316
      @harir6316 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@786humaira1 Muslims are never patriots they created their own country. Tell me the names of Muslims who fought for Indian independence.

  • @chandasingh6663
    @chandasingh6663 5 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    BJP it cell wale apni naukri kar rahe hai....please don't comment

    • @kailashpati496
      @kailashpati496 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Tu kis party ki IT cell member ha???

    • @umardaraz2736
      @umardaraz2736 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @vimalshahi9299
      @vimalshahi9299 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kailashpati496 🤡🤡🤡

    • @balbhattfromthirdofsevenof7496
      @balbhattfromthirdofsevenof7496 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hyperventilating Ashutosh needs to fact check first. Dhimmi should know that even great leader like madan mohan malviya left congress to start Hindu Mahasabha to unify society and consolidation can later work towards greater good. Was he then quitter ? Idiot sitting and clapping do not know they are same kind of idiots those who were celebrating british role!!!

    • @trick_er
      @trick_er 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kailashpati496 india naam ki party ka hai

  • @mohtashimansari8256
    @mohtashimansari8256 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Well said Ashutosh sir

  • @貴方の愛
    @貴方の愛 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    @17:33, "...Twice he (Hedgewar) went to the jail, not written in the history..."
    There were thousands of other protesters whose names not written in the history, so what? There are thousands of loyals who've sacrificed their lives and their children's lives for the Nation, but their names can't be found in history. This jahil Nigam must understand this fact before claiming something.

    • @akb0014
      @akb0014 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yupp bro..

    • @sohandesai818
      @sohandesai818 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      So you admit there's a chance that RSS contribution in freedom struggle may not be documented.

    • @rash6821
      @rash6821 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sohandesai818 not more than left

    • @sohandesai818
      @sohandesai818 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rash6821 do you mean INC?

  • @shivaprakash4033
    @shivaprakash4033 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Sir, after coming out from jail with stratergy , what did savarkarji do???

    • @dilipthombre4806
      @dilipthombre4806 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @shiva prakash
      plz read his work for untouchability and against castism
      then you will know
      without reading dont make opinion...

    • @madhusudhanh76
      @madhusudhanh76 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dilipthombre4806 sir... The whole point is he did not fight for India freedom struggle... He was a social reformer that's it..

    • @JOMfan
      @JOMfan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@madhusudhanh76 And that is why he was in the Andaman prison? Because he was a social reformer?

    • @dilipthombre4806
      @dilipthombre4806 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@madhusudhanh76
      there are many freedomfighter
      like ARVINDO GHOSH
      after release from Andman jail
      did not fight....
      swa.sawarkar was sent for 50yrs jail...
      how many freedom fighers from
      anyother group
      had convicted for 50yrs jail?
      was it for just being a socialreformer??1910-1923
      was not sufficient to be in andaman jail??
      just compare it
      jail for peacful cong workers
      against
      Andaman jail for sawarkar.
      what ever he had done after release
      only for this nation
      not in self interest.
      his revolutionary orgainsation was finished within span twenty yrs after he was jailed.
      his family members were living very miserable life.
      his property was sealed by british govt.
      now i ask one question how many members of your forefathers participated in freedom fight with
      Gun or sword?? if not
      then ask them.....
      you are enjoying freedom not by mercy of your forefathers

    • @Raut-warrior
      @Raut-warrior 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      he fought against caste discrimination, he united the hindus fought for their rights from islamists

  • @girishshanker3779
    @girishshanker3779 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    If Savarakar did social service, we can not call it traitor. Gandhi did the same (social welfare) at different times.

  • @AjitJoshi686
    @AjitJoshi686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mani Shankar Aiyar should be given Bharat Ratna for insulting Modi as Chaiwala and kicking plaque of Savarkar at Cellular Jail.

  • @prashantkumarsinghx1470
    @prashantkumarsinghx1470 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Sachindranath sanyal was a co prisoner of Savarkar ,who also filed a mercy petition and got free .

    • @sagarbansal1412
      @sagarbansal1412 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Liberals cry over Veer Savarkar just because he was hindu nationalist . There is no other reason .

    • @lookintoit4537
      @lookintoit4537 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anecdote: He was the grand uncle of our present economic advisor.

  • @shubhamrathod6859
    @shubhamrathod6859 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    वीर सावरकर महान देशभक्त थे🙏

  • @anoopkumarbarthwal1115
    @anoopkumarbarthwal1115 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Balanced discussion although Ashutosh behaved unprofessionaly. But it is amazing that Muslims were always given priority at the cost of Hindus in forties too. Nobody on the Dias justified Veer Savarkar in the context of Muslims desire for a separate land which they got.

    • @naveenghgh
      @naveenghgh 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anoop Kumar Barthwal ; sir i felt same. In fact these secular debators should b interrogated on the same line of questions. Why shouldn't they go to Pakistan and convince them to be united again with secular India? How many have spent a day even asking Pakistani leaders about partition? They only ask what savarkar did post this post that.... all rubbish .... what are they doing?

    • @RiyaSharma-ox5ev
      @RiyaSharma-ox5ev 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just to be clear, Congress, which WAS A HINDU MAJORITY PARTY, WON the 1946 elections. On what idiotic basis do you then say that Muslims were given priority at the cost of Hindus.
      Its just that RADICAL parties like the Hindu Mahasabha and the RSS did not have many supporters because of their violent ideals and anti-secular principles.

  • @bknmd7
    @bknmd7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    RSS is great in Freedom Movement
    Great RSS ,My Salute..

  • @gajendrachandra1022
    @gajendrachandra1022 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    You must must & must have someone like BOSE, BHAGAT SINGH for defending SAVARKAR's work, this man can't be defended by his own work.
    Either you can praise him or criticize him but he is an QUESTIONABLE character.

    • @navintiwari112
      @navintiwari112 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Let me put things in a better perspective for you...
      Netaji's contributions in freedom struggle > Veer Savarkar's > > Bhagat Singh's > Nehru's

    • @Fan4club
      @Fan4club 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Depends on Who is calling him “ questionable “. I fully agree with you ,only Bose or B.Sing would do the job properly.

  • @Timakiwala
    @Timakiwala 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mr Irfan is from Congress, Mr Rahul from left, Mr Ashutosh now no where...All are againt Hindustan...This debet is for SwaVeer Vinayak Damodar Savarkar not for RSS....
    Rahul Kawal is only to increase TRP

  • @abhijeetthombre4213
    @abhijeetthombre4213 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Calling Ashutosh! I thought this was a serious debate

  • @pbkvijaykulkarni6404
    @pbkvijaykulkarni6404 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Habib - RSS played active role in 1942, which communists boycotted

    • @GHexplore
      @GHexplore 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      RSS did nothing. There leader Shyamaprasad Mukherjee was trying to make the Quit India movement weak.

    • @ramamoorthiadhiseshan9571
      @ramamoorthiadhiseshan9571 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Veer savarkar is more relevant in today's scenario our country surrounded by m slim fanatic countries the country needs rss for the protection of hindus

  • @boomboom9768
    @boomboom9768 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Left ka kya contribution h....plzzz expalain..

    • @smtkumar007
      @smtkumar007 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      INC mai john bade bade freedom fighter the , voh rss se nahi aye the bro

    • @GHexplore
      @GHexplore 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @Saurav Singh Left ka contribution yeh hai k woh Subhas Chandra Bose, Bhagat Singh, Rasbehari Bose, Chandra Sekhar Azad jaisa revolutionaries paida kya. Tumhra right kisko paida kya?

    • @cristianosilva4301
      @cristianosilva4301 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GHexplore woh log left nahi true freedom fighters the .jo sahi samay pe sahi kam karne ki takat tatha samaj rakhte the

  • @sapnabaldua828
    @sapnabaldua828 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sawarkar has always been a revered patriot for simple indian public like me and so many- the polititions and so on May choose to play and stoop low and show the truth of their stained mentality!

  • @shyamsingh346
    @shyamsingh346 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    At least he was not a 'veer'. He was an imaginary of the today's devisive thought of the fragmented nation devided on the line of caste, creed and religion.They are bitter against the scheduled castes and the enlightened people of this nation.
    I pray daily if my country will save itself from these venomous snakes.

    • @archanawarrier6277
      @archanawarrier6277 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Veer savarkar was an athiest, he never believed in any single religion. And he was against britishers separating Hindus with caste. He wanted to come out of jail and unite people against British. Indira Gandhi herself called him son of India. Even though nehru rejected him.

    • @Mutinous_
      @Mutinous_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Was Nehru a PANDIT in real sense?

  • @ajaykumarnayak8560
    @ajaykumarnayak8560 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This how a debate should be made....

  • @Isabhaisuratwala
    @Isabhaisuratwala 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Jagdish tytler,sajjan kumar,dharam das shastri,lalit makan,H K L Bhagat,Kishori lal can be the next BHARAT RATTNA........for there duties for the country......

  • @bknmd7
    @bknmd7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Veer Savarkar promoted youth to join Army and suggested Neta G to use them against Britishers...

  • @SumitSharma-mb7dx
    @SumitSharma-mb7dx 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Savarkar is great

    • @GHexplore
      @GHexplore 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes great in writing mercy petition. 😂

  • @rays2802
    @rays2802 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    savarrkar was way ahead of his time..

  • @aks0890
    @aks0890 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Habib exactly pin pointed the pain of RSS.🤪😜

  • @pkk5612
    @pkk5612 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    People like Ashutosh does not qualify to talk on a huge personality like Savarkar.

  • @harshalsharma373
    @harshalsharma373 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bring Vikram sampath and you will see all the sitting left to the podium running like a cat.. 😂😂

  • @SunilGupta-cs6oj
    @SunilGupta-cs6oj 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    but what was the strategy ?

  • @ayazsiddiquiamu
    @ayazsiddiquiamu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Very informative, and moderated in a very neutral way

  • @PradeepmysurNagaraj
    @PradeepmysurNagaraj 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What is Hindutva?
    India as a Nation was not born on August 15 1947, India is a continuing civilization with a Milleniea old Continuity more than a few thousand years lived civilizational experience.
    The primary philosophical thought of India was all inclusive, all accepting, it was never exclusivist and most importantly it never negated the existence of any other philosophical, Spiritual or Religious thought.
    However when the philosophies of this land came in contact with Semitic Religions, which inherently are exclusivist,
    Which inherently exclusivist are conflicting, predatory and proselytising there needed to be a response by a non exclusive, inclusive faith which can be called Common wealth of Hindu Spiritual traditions, to therefore respond to the agression, predation and proselytising attempts made by Abrahamic faiths which came to Indian soil, A response was made by Hindus at that time, and that in later context was called Hindutva.
    *If Hinduism is the potential inclusivity of the common wealth of indigenous thought,
    Then Hindutva can be a kinetic effect, which primarily is to defend the Hindu philosophy, culture against Abrahmic-Semitic faiths which is not primarily inclusive, predatory and proselytising*
    Hindutva by nature cannot be aggressive.Because the very response of Hindutva emanated to be defensive.
    Hindutva is a intellectual, political, socio response of the Hindus to prevent itself and themselves against aggression. Therefore Hindutva cannot be dominating, because Hinduism is a victim of Aggression.
    Hindutva by its very nature cannot be agressive, because the very response to Hindutva emanated to be defensive.
    Unless we examine and scrutinize the Abrahmic semitic faiths which by their very nature are proselytising & predatory & which by their very nature go the extent of negating other faiths as false faiths, then we must ask questions, should Hindus, should not come up with Intellectual, Political - Socio response to preserve and perpetuate the long lasting way of life.
    We can't accept
    the false equivalences drawn between two entities.
    1. "La ilah illa Allah"
    "There is no God but Allah "
    2. "Jai Shree Raam"
    "Victory to Raam"
    "La ilah illa Allah" is a negation of the existence of my God, However we won't negate other belief systems.
    Sir Sayyed Ahmed Khan in 1926, Hindus and Muslims are different Nations.
    "It is a Shame to both the Hindus & Muslamaans that the Hindus should have to run away from their homes as they have done, it is the shame for the Muslims because it is out of the fear of the Muslims that the Hindus have to run away from their homes, why Should a Human being inspire fear on other Human, My own experience but confirms the opinion that the Musalmaan as a rule is a bully and the Hindu as a rule is a coward" Mahatma Gandhi after Noakhali Massacre.
    Writing Thoughts on Pakistan - Dr. B.R.Ambedkar.
    The Hindus and the Hindutva leaders whose primary ideology is defensive reaction towards aggression have been put in witness box as perpetrators of aggression. That has to change for always and for good times to come, we must be asking questions to those followers and leaders of Abrahamic faiths and we must put them to the same kind of scrutiny as put to the Hindu leaders. Does not your Religion at the very fundamental belief believe in dividing the World between believers and non believers? Is that not exclusivist? Unless we have intellectual strength to ask these fundamental questions we will be continuing to draw false equivalences and we will be treating the symptoms and not the disease itself.
    PS : As long as proselytising Religions continue their existence as as Proselytising Religions Hindutva should be there to protect itself and not just protect itself but also protect the values that the Hindu society has perpetually held as sacred & sacrosanct & those values are in consonance to the modern secular values that Indian constitution so dearly upholds....

  • @royp6986
    @royp6986 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Irfan habib sir please refer to this quote from Ambedkar sir in his books thoughts on Pakistan”The Indian Army today is pre-dominantly Muslim in its composition. The Muslims who predominate are from Punjab and North West Frontier Province (see table below). It means that such Muslims are made the sole defenders of India from foreign invasion. The Hindus will have to pay for the Army but will not be able to use them because the realist must note that of all the Muslims, those of the North-West is the most disaffected Muslim, in his relation with the Hindus”. [Thoughts on Pakistan, p. 89]

  • @boomboom9768
    @boomboom9768 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    3 vs 2....
    And winner is 2 ...
    Great...

    • @GHexplore
      @GHexplore 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In your dreams those 2 won..😂

    • @knots1975
      @knots1975 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@GHexplore of course they did.jai sawarkar

  • @p-yadav
    @p-yadav 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nilanjan is an opportunist

  • @ABHISHEKSINGH-qm8qo
    @ABHISHEKSINGH-qm8qo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Veer savarkar is great man.

  • @मनिष_चौधरी
    @मनिष_चौधरी 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nor gandhiji was 100% Perfect And Nor Savarkar But Both Were Thinking Best in there intellect for India I think this topic was Baseless Moderater should Avoid such topic form which there is NO Gaine for Nation.

  • @edisonbrain
    @edisonbrain 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Savarkar is not an attractive figure to my eyes but I feel like they should have let Mr. Nigam speak.

    • @nitikakolnad8465
      @nitikakolnad8465 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      So you dint hear Vikram Sampath, salute to him

  • @indian7098
    @indian7098 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Only crime of Savarkar was mixing Independent struggle of India with Hinduism.

  • @rahulozarde9892
    @rahulozarde9892 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Totally low quality, unbalanced and one directional discussion.... The fuming of Ashutosh, sarcasm of Habib , counters by Nilanjan and least time given to the other side speakers and dodging and directional questions by Rahul......deeply disappointed

  • @ramakantanayak1539
    @ramakantanayak1539 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is good to know about Veer Svarkar

  • @knowledgefull2452
    @knowledgefull2452 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yes court acquitted Vir Savarkar.

    • @bobinpune
      @bobinpune 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Court said there was no "direct evidence". But he wasn't honorably discharged. And Patel banned RSS because of these shenanigans!

  • @anonsurf23
    @anonsurf23 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bring J Sai Deepak and all of these leftist propagandist will remain silent 😂

  • @sudhanshushekhar9461
    @sudhanshushekhar9461 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    There is a lynching debate 3 verses 2. But , award gang not come to return their award.

    • @theseeker7194
      @theseeker7194 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Rahul Kanwal is also a centre-left, see how poorly he moderates the debate and repeatedly interrupts the right wing author but doesn't do that for Irfan or Ashutosh when they intervene when their counterparts try to put forth their opinions. So it's 2 vs 4, a heavily biased debate.

  • @khajamaslauddin2039
    @khajamaslauddin2039 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Superb Ashutosh, perfect way of placing the reality

  • @RichiAnand95
    @RichiAnand95 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Why Any Country Get Freedom ???
    For Job ?
    Good economic Condition of Life ??
    Or Restore Own Culture ??
    Restore Our 5000 Years Culture Only Every Thing Is Next Step By Product ..

    • @chickwit2575
      @chickwit2575 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      5000 years culture includes caste system, inhumane treatment of women, etc.

  • @zisankhan2821
    @zisankhan2821 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Desh Ratan Nigam is the same person who told that Red fort was built by the tomara and Tajmahal was a hindu temple .

  • @kamleshmehta502
    @kamleshmehta502 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Mr Nigam is inventing strategy for everything what Savarkar did which even Savarkar did not had.

  • @johnlivingston1631
    @johnlivingston1631 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Let there be a discussion on agriculture, irrigation, milk production, social problems, future of industries, etc.,

  • @anandpandey9988
    @anandpandey9988 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Ye vo irfan habib nahi hain, ye hain irfan habib junior wale

  • @mathematicallyyours6566
    @mathematicallyyours6566 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good debate....

  • @Bharat_ek_khooj
    @Bharat_ek_khooj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Rss walo ka defence is "strategy"😎😂😂😂

    • @sachithrao6353
      @sachithrao6353 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nehru father had to beg for pardon...
      Aww had to talk to daddy

  • @rajivsrivastav7218
    @rajivsrivastav7218 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ashutosh is rightly said.

  • @ajaymuj
    @ajaymuj 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bhai. You cannot compare bhagat singh and savarkar mercy petitions. Savarkar was given a life time prison vs bhagat singh was given death sentence. There is so huge difference between the two. Death sentence mark the end of life, so the thoughts that comes to one against death sentence vs one who was kept in solitary confinement for life. He came out with mercy petitions and carried out his work.

    • @arihankrishna
      @arihankrishna 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't think Bhagat Singh anywhere called himself a 'humble servant' of the British Raj. No comparison

    • @ajaymuj
      @ajaymuj 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@arihankrishna I see. He must had mentioned 'against british raj at any cost' and should had been in solitary confinement till death. Good logic bro..

  • @sanchardarshan
    @sanchardarshan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Most important question is that how many freedom fighters apologized to Britishers and promised them loyalty ????

  • @kishu9108
    @kishu9108 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Let bring Vikram Sampat

  • @swarachitmathsclassesbyvij838
    @swarachitmathsclassesbyvij838 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    From 2 seats to 304 seats is a proof that Indians have started denying the history written by these tukade tukade gang . So these arguments given by the likes of irfan habib and his ills are now a big hollow talks which no body is going to bye that. You people have done enough damage which we Indians have understood very well

  • @Ranjankumar-bo2hq
    @Ranjankumar-bo2hq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Veer Savarkar zindabad 🙏
    Nathuram Godse Zindabad 🙏

  • @msc3329
    @msc3329 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not giving chance to the aithor himself shows the intent of rahul

  • @jagdishbaghel8169
    @jagdishbaghel8169 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Ha....rajiv gandhi ne to freedom struggle mai bada yogdan diya tha .....thtswhy he was given bharat ratna

    • @bobinpune
      @bobinpune 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He brought the Information Technology revolution to India. Anyhow. Sawarkar was brave and patriotic, but Kala Paani broke his spirit. Then he colluded with British and plotted to kill Mahatma.
      Osama Bin Laden may have been good in his younger years, but he'll be remembered as terrorist, not some sort of "Veer"!

  • @smpbhat5470
    @smpbhat5470 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic session 👌

  • @thetruthind
    @thetruthind 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ashutosh is completely wrong..saying that Late Bajpayee ji never propagated Ayodhya issue. In his last speech in parliament, he said that it is only we are not in majority..the day we would come in majority, we would sort out Ayodhya and Article 370. I have no doubt Mr Ashutosh has bad agenda and equally a fool.

  • @Ranjankumar-bo2hq
    @Ranjankumar-bo2hq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Enough discussion on Savarkar and RSS. It's time we discuss Nehru and Gandhi.

  • @sushant3201
    @sushant3201 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why a hooligan like Irfan and an irrational former AAP Ashutosh included in panel discussion. To recall the disgraceful conduct of Irfan when he lunged fwd menacingly at Shri Arif Mohammed Khan, Governor Kerala. India Today group are compulsive critic of Modi

    • @Kafkaesque1965
      @Kafkaesque1965 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He is syed irrfan habib
      The man who manhandled arif is irfan habib

  • @curiousreporter4292
    @curiousreporter4292 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Strategy
    Strategy 😁😁😁

    • @shraddha8777
      @shraddha8777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      uske ke liye dimag lagta hai... if u read and know abt Savarkar.. u'll knw he was smart enough to use such tactics... u'll probably take ages to reach that level of intelligence...

    • @sohandesai818
      @sohandesai818 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Read Shawshank Redemption. Savarkar's case is very similar.

    • @royp6986
      @royp6986 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Read of thoughts on pakistan written by ambedkar you will understand the confusion

  • @suvaskadam9206
    @suvaskadam9206 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good. Job . Purandare and nigam

  • @lalitpatil925
    @lalitpatil925 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    After 70 years of freedom intellectual people like Rahul and Ashutosh talking on contributions of Veer Savarkar? The person who’s entire family fought for freedom of India. Only person who sentenced Kala Pani twice in life. The person who gave so many words and writing so that’s people can join freedom moment. He is the visionary who Elaborate what is freedom and after freedom for India.
    This is next to unfortunate to hear words from Ashutosh and Habib who’s contribution to India so far nothing but to spread lies?

    • @rajbrar1394
      @rajbrar1394 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lalit Patil ..., were you born stupid or raised to be one ?

    • @rudrankpatel379
      @rudrankpatel379 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Where a prodigal son can return but to the doors of his father🤣🤣🤣

  • @vishal8271
    @vishal8271 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gandhi supported Britishers in WW1 and recuited men to fight for British.. he was enabler of moplah riots

  • @ashishshah5667
    @ashishshah5667 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    When I listened Ashutosh it reminds me famous gujarati proverb " અધૂરો ઘડો છલકાય ઘણો"

  • @spsharma8108
    @spsharma8108 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Send Ashutosh to Cellular Jail for one day, keep like Savarkar, then see what happens.

  • @svimagic
    @svimagic 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rahul Kanwal is also a leftist and he was biased in the conversation

  • @shivaprakash4033
    @shivaprakash4033 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What is the contribution in freedom struggle from RSS,,

    • @rubiyaparvin
      @rubiyaparvin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      None

    • @truth7653
      @truth7653 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Shiva Prakash, nil

    • @SiddharthPandey2452
      @SiddharthPandey2452 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      A Big 0...
      But yeah their army includes many Britishers🙂

  • @nandinisarangal9796
    @nandinisarangal9796 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Enlightening debate conducted in a highly professional way....Rahul 👍🏻

  • @curdrice9739
    @curdrice9739 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This hypocrite rahul kanwal dont let right to talk but he himself talks more and cuts. This fool ashutosh who has no clue about history. Like a paapi mixes nonsense

    • @GHexplore
      @GHexplore 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anyway right doesn't have any past glory, it would be a waste of time to give them more opportunities to speak. They will be either criticizing Gandhi or Nehru. They are actually good for nothing

  • @NjRobey
    @NjRobey 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rahul Kanwal a poor bias moderator... didn't give enough time to Nigam & Vaibhav

    • @GHexplore
      @GHexplore 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anyway they didn't have enough historical facts to defend. Good Rahul didn't listen to their nonsense.

  • @vivekmahajan3723
    @vivekmahajan3723 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Ek banda RSS ke support me hai. Aur baki 4 oppose me.

    • @GHexplore
      @GHexplore 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's how it should be. They are good for nothing