Hinduism and Buddhism Explained | What is the difference between Hinduism and Buddhism?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 มิ.ย. 2024
- In this video we compare 5 characteristics between the 3rd and 4th largest religions in the world, Hinduism and Buddhism.
Hinduism is considered one of the oldest religions in the world, with roots dating back over 4,000 years. It is a complex and diverse religious tradition that evolved over time in the Indian subcontinent. Hinduism does not have a single founder but emerged from the religious and cultural practices of ancient India.
Buddhism was founded in the 5th century BCE by Siddhartha Gautama, also known as the Buddha. Siddhartha was a prince who renounced his luxurious life to seek enlightenment. After attaining enlightenment, he taught his insights and principles, forming the foundation of Buddhism.
Learn more by watching the rest of the video!
Sources:
Britannica. "Hinduism." Accessed May 31, 2023. www.britannica.com/topic/Hind...
Britannica. "Buddhism." Accessed May 31, 2023. www.britannica.com/topic/Budd...
#hinduism #buddhism #religion
But we can all agree that the people who follow these religions make the most delicious food
Hahaaaa😂
We used to have an Indian restaurant near me. The lamb was delicious and the owner sometimes went around giving customers free alcohol. Whether he was correcting Karma or working on Dharma I do not know. But when my wife drinks I benefit 😎
Beautiful flowers might looks to different from tree, soil and fertilizer but molecularly same. So debates aren't beneficial everywhere specially organized by social media and narratives..
I am seeing some people writing that Sanatan dharma (Hinduism) has CASTE SYSTEM which is wrong Hinduism has Varna system which based on karma but it became caste system which was based upon birth..............NO HINDU TEXT PROMOTES INEQUALITY AMONG PEOPLE.....ITS PEOPLE'S FAULT
Still its practiced only among Hindus. Which is why buddha was right. Hindusim does not lead to Enlightement. How could it ? By creating inequality among people ?
@@n.sadequi4381 Again it's the people who create inequalities among themselves............There are over 1.1 to 1.2 billion Hindus and 90% don't promote this man made system who are in India,Nepal, Mauritius , Indonesia , newly converts etc........who feel purpose in there life and feel that they are getting closer to enlightenment with different ways...................
@@n.sadequi4381lmao like buddha completely reject caste system.
Read his views on intercaste marriage in angulimala sutta u will know.
@@n.sadequi4381that's not Hinduism fault it's people do islam accounts for each terrorist
Didn't found anything wrong? Maybe you are reading some wrong interpretation.
Original religion of sidhaarth gautama was Hinduism only after enlightenment awakening he was called buddha and followers are called Buddhist following culture and practice is called Buddhism.
Siddhartha was living in a Royal family. They didn't have a religion. Early Brahamanism survived with the help of modified texts like Mahabharat, Valmiki's Ramayan, Bhagawath geetha after the Chandraguptha's invation.
@@smlanka4u😂
💐THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the last age in which God saves man from the destruction of this old world"
(This may be a reminder for most people of God's words from Genesis: "Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness." Suppose God is saying that "let us" make man in "our " picture, then "ours" shows two or more; since He said "ours," then God is not only one. In this way, man begins to think generally of different persons, and from these words came the idea of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. At the time Moses wrote Genesis, it was after the creation of mankind following the creation of the world. In the beginning, when the world, Moses did not exist yet. And it was a long time before Moses wrote the Bible, so how could he possibly know what God said in heaven? He was unaware of how God created the world. What is written in the Old Testament is the work of Jehovah, a phase of the work of God Himself for ushering in the Age of Law. This is the work of God, where as He spoke, it happened, and as He commanded, it remained. When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. When man speaks of separate persons, does it not reflect God? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Doesn't the Spirit of God simply carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives?" Because of this, there is no distinction between persons.)
Almighty God said
This can be a REMINDER for most PEOPLE of GOD'S WORDS from GENESIS: "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." Suppose GOD says "we" will CREATE MAN in "our" IMAGE, then "we" SHOWS TWO or MORE; since He SAID "we," then GOD is NOT one. IN THIS WAY, MAN BEGAN TO THINK GENERALLY OF DIFFERENT PERSONS, AND FROM THESE WORDS HAD THE IDEA OF THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. What then does the Father look like? What does the Son look like? And what does the Holy Spirit look like? ☀️🙏
Could it be that the present man was made in the image of the one who was put together from the three? Then is the image of man like that of the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit? 🙏
WHICH of the persons of GOD is the image of MAN? This idea of MAN is ABSOLUTELY WRONG and NONSENSE! It can only separate one God from several Gods. 🙏
AT THE TIME Moses WROTE GENESIS, it was AFTER MANKIND WAS CREATED AFTER THE CREATION OF THE WORLD. In the BEGINNING, when the WORLD began, Moses did NOT exist. And IT TOOK A LONG TIME FOR MOSES TO WRITE THE BIBLE, so HOW could he possibly KNOW WHAT GOD SAID in HEAVEN?🙏☀️
He is UNCONSCIOUS of HOW GOD CREATED THE WORLD. 🙏
In the OLD TESTAMENT of the Bible, there is NO mention of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, only the TRUE GOD, JEHOVAH, is PERFORMING His WORK in ISRAEL. ☀️
He is CALLED by different NAMES in the CHANGING TIMES, but this DOESN'T PROVE that each NAME REFERES to a different PERSON. Therefore, then wouldn't there be countless persons of God? What is WRITTEN in the OLD TESTAMENT is the WORK of JEHOVAH, A PHASE of the WORK of GOD HIMSELF for the START of the Age of Law. This is GOD'S WORK, where ACCORDING to what He SPOKE, it happened, and ACCORDING to what He commanded, it REMAINS. 🙏💐
AT NO TIME DID JEHOVAH SAY HE WAS THE FATHER WHO WOULD COME TO EFFECT THE WORK, or did He even foretell the coming of the Son to redeem mankind. WHEN IT CAME TO THE TIME OF JESUS, it was only mentioned that GOD became MAN to REDEEM ALL MANKIND, NOT that the SON CAME. ☀️
Because the times are not the same and the work that God Himself carries out is also different, He has to carry out His work within different kingdoms. In this way, the identity He represents is also different. PEOPLE BELIEVE JEHOVAH IS THE FATHER OF JESUS, but JESUS DOESN'T REALLY ACKNOWLEDGE, saying: "We were never identified as Father and Son; I and the Father in heaven are one. The Father is in Me and I am in the Father; when men see the Son, they see the Father in heaven." ☀️😪
When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. By the time man attempts to explain, matters are complicated by the idea of different persons, as well as the relationship between Father, Son, and Spirit. WHEN MAN TALKS ABOUT separate persons, does it not reflect GOD? 🙏🔅
Man even ranks persons as first, second, and third; these are all mere human understandings, unworthy of reference, and utterly unreal! If you ask him: "How many are there in God?" He will say that God is the Trinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit: the one true God. If you ask him: "Who is the Father?" He will say: The Father is the Spirit of God in heaven; He rules over all, and He is the Lord of heaven." "Then is Jehovah the Spirit?" ☀️
He will say: "Yes!" If you ask him afterwards, "Who is the Son?" He will say that Jesus is the Son, anyway: "Then what is the story of Jesus? From whom did He come?" He will say: "Jesus was born of Mary through the shadowing of the Holy Spirit. " ☀️
"Then is not His substance also Spirit? Does His work also represent the Holy Spirit?
Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Now in the last days, it goes without saying that the Spirit still works; how did He become different persons? Doesn't the Spirit of God just carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives? Because of this, there is no difference between personas. 🙏
From "Is There a Trinity?"
Fulfilled in "In the beginning He was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). ... and "When I looked up, someone handed me a book wrapped in a scroll. I opened it and I read on both sides the prayers, lamentations, and curses." (Ezekiel 2:9-10). ... "His garment was stained with blood. He was called the "Word of God" (Rev. 19:13).
The kingdom He brought down and set up in the highest in the sky so that it can occupy His creation in the universe and engrave on it the entirety of His Holy name "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD" 💐 fulfillment of (Mat. 16:18) "And I say as for you, you are Peter, on top of this rock I will build my Church, that even the power of death will not prevail over it.". ... and "The Letter to the Church in Philadelphia" (Rev. 3:7-13). ... And fulfillment of "The New Jerusalem" 💫 "The Spirit enveloped me, and the angel led me to the top of a very high mountain. He showed Me Jerusalem, the Holy City, coming down from heaven from God." (Rev. 3:7-13). ... " For the time has come in the house of God for the beginning of judgment in the house of God." (1 Peter 4:17). ... It is fulfilled that God Himself is our Pastor in (Rev. 7:17) 💐
"For the Lamb in the midst of the throne will be their PASTOR. He will lead them to springs of life-giving water; and God will wipe away the tears from their eyes"
📩 Calling and leading the sheep of God to His glorious Throne "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD"💐 to submit again to His authority so that He will continue to teach, guide and protect even in plague, famine and wild animals will not be moved by it and completely win this final battle with the big red dragon!
"They say with a loud voice, "Salvation comes from the Lamb, and from our God who sits on the Throne!" (Rev. 7:10). ... and it will be fulfilled that will be established above the sky/TH-cam in (Isaiah 2: 2 / 9:6) "On the Last Day, the mountain on which Jehovah's temple stands will stand out above all the mountains. All nations will flock there. " . . . "For a baby boy is born to us. The rule will be given to him; and he shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Almighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace."✉️ 💌
Yeah Siddhartha probably left Hinduism because of the barbaric caste system and untouchability, which is still there and some idiotic hindus still justify it. 🤮
YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND INDIA WITHOUT JAINISM…. BUDDHISM IS AN OFFSHOOT OF JAINISM. Gautam Siddhartha (Buddha) followed the practices of Digambar Jain monks during his 6 years of searching (see MAJJHIMA NIKAYA). He studied under Uddaka Ramaputta who was a teacher of Jainism mentioned also in the Jain scriptures as well. Buddha’s “Middle Way” was basically a protest against Jain monastic practices. Buddha’s uncle Vappa was a Jain according to Buddhist scriptures. Buddha got a lot of his terminology directly from Jainism, such as Nirvana, Samyak, Arhat, Jina, 5 vows, etc. Buddha was born and raised in an area of India where Jainism was strong (foothills of the Himalayas). The list goes on.
It was very nice, I can't wait to learn more about Hinduism!!...
I would take this channel's teachings on "Hinduism" with a "grain of salt."
Buddhism, like all knowledge, is actually a branch of the Vedas, but over time, teachings change due to time, place, circumstance, etc.
Watch the "Eternal Religion" vid n its description by youtuber "Playitalready" which is currently his main vid, then click his sub n bell icons for some EPIC vids in the future that are more detailed, well sourced, interesting, n HD. Comment there because youtube's A I removes comments a lot, but Playitalready tries to UN remove comments directed to me, or him.
Also youtube search "Scientific Verification of Vedic Knowledge--Full Length" by Stephen Knapp.
Let me know if this comment, helped.
Hinduism is totally different from Buddhism. Hinduism has no particular one origin. There are many devas in Hindu. Where as Buddhism emerged only from Gautama Buddha thats why its called Buddhism.
So Buddha learned about other religions first, maybe Hinduism too since it's oldest religion in the world, before he realized they were wrong path (not leading to nirvana, enlightenment, peaceful lasting state), so he went out on his own; and after 6 long years of starving and hunger (almost killed himself), he followed the middle path, middle way which eventually led him to enlightment and of course nirvana after he passed, forever left earth. No one no being is quite like Buddha 😊
Another reactionary religion to Hinduism is Jainism
Buddhism or Hinduism is not a religion both are new words derived centuries after these culture have arrived
Indian culture which you call budhism or Hinduism has dities & Salvation from karma is target of both Hindus & Buddhist also there's no difference only difference is budhism in atheist school is ancient times
YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND INDIA WITHOUT JAINISM…. BUDDHISM IS AN OFFSHOOT OF JAINISM. Gautam Siddhartha (Buddha) followed the practices of Digambar Jain monks during his 6 years of searching (see MAJJHIMA NIKAYA). He studied under Uddaka Ramaputta who was a teacher of Jainism mentioned also in the Jain scriptures as well. Buddha’s “Middle Way” was basically a protest against Jain monastic practices. Buddha’s uncle Vappa was a Jain according to Buddhist scriptures. Buddha got a lot of his terminology directly from Jainism, such as Nirvana, Samyak, Arhat, Jina, 5 vows, etc. Buddha was born and raised in an area of India where Jainism was strong (foothills of the Himalayas). The list goes on.
Did you not see the last part? To break free from Samsara (cycle of rebirth) in Hinduism is called Moksha and the same in Buddhism is called Nirvana. Moksha and Nirvana are one and the same. Buddha was a Hindu prince who wanted a simpler solution to lifes problems so he created Buddhism and the 8 rules. Hinduism is more complex and deals with also the scientific aspect of the universe. There are no real Gods in Hinduism just manifestations of the forces of the universe and of human character example Shiva and Brahma represents the renewal of the universe through destruction and creation. Krishna represents a human of great moral integrity.
@@ashleysilver5594WHY GOD NEED TO BE MANISFESTED?
3:18 "buddhists don't have a caste system" well look into Sri Lanka they did have(Govigamas etc.) and that's considered the "most buddhist" country
While Sri Lanka had a caste system, it is not as hierarchical as the Hindu caste system.
@@Desertfox18you probably havent read buddhist tripitakas then
Buddha considered kshatriyas as the highest caste
@@antiabrahamicreligionhe was kshatriya himself....
Also said "shudrakool" can't become buddhist
Liar... give source (sutta) which says sudrakoola can't be monk or Buddhist...Liar@@jaisinghrajput2995
The four Dharmic religions (Hindu-Buddhist-Jain-Sikhism) native to the land of Bharat share ideas of Karma, Dharma, Samsara, Moksha, and Yoga.
These religions share many similarities in core beliefs, modes of worship, and associated practices with 'Om' being the highest energy source. Ek Omkar.
In Buddhism Dhamma is the Prakrit word for the Sanskrit word Dharma and in Jainism, the word "Dharma" is termed as 'dharmastikaay' and In Sikhism called 'Dharman'.
Respect all the 4 🙏
All these four coexisted.
Actually sanatan is also Buddhist word, es dhammo sanantano. It was later stolen by Brahmins after Buddhism perished away.
@@Manoj-vp5indig into topics deeper or actually visit and talk with the ones who follow it. Buddhism was born by rejecting vedas, saying one doesn't necessarily need knowledge for moksh (which is true) knowledge does help but isn't necessary. Sanskrit is one of the oldest language and still prevails to this day and many languages are derived from it. Sanatan is a Sanskrit word. Whether it is Pali or any other devanagari scripts all are derivatives of Sanskrit. The evidence of Sanskrit dates back to 1500 BCE while for Pali it dates back to 3rd/5th century BCE.
As a once wester Christian I have taking something from both without knowing about them. One God, service to others, meditation, KARMA, reincarnation and so on. I have my own path. I believe to follow any religion is restrictive.
From my study, I've found Christ to be the most reliable person to know about God and the path of Salvation( which is a free gift), through the historical evidence for Jesus' life, death n reserruction. No other religion has such validity as Christianity. And no other religion gives you the assurance of Salvation but Christianity. May Jesus bless and lead you and your loved ones to Him.
@@dutchkittensten1079Resurrection is myth
@@seekjustice-gp2xi Why do you think so?
Very interesting! A conversation starter at the least..
It's a nice vid to talk on. it's "incomplete" n inaccurate.
Buddhism is really a branch of the Vedas (what he incorrectly refers to as "Hinduism" n incorrectly claims teaches a birth based caste system when Vedas never mentioned that system except when it correctly warned that society would fall into it). Thus, other than Buddhism not mentioning a creator n permanence, all Buddhist teachings I ever read, are consistently Vedic.
Buddha did talk about Demigods of the Vedas (AKA Angels), heaven, n hell. However, in 5th Veda it correctly predicted God would incarnate to help animals and, "...appear as Lord Buddha, the son of Añjanā, in the province of Gayā, just for the purpose of deluding those who are envious of the faithful theist."
4,000 years? The Vedas were composed OVER 5,000 years ago, but were taught through word of mouth BEFORE that, for countless millennia (to societies that were more advanced than us). Vedas have a history of 4.3 billion Earth years, which they teach is 1 day on a top planet in the universe. Check out those roughly 10,000 year old cities found miles from India in the Ocean (reported by sources like the BBC).
Over 5,000 years ago there was a great war involving the powerful rulers of Earth, with the victor becoming basically the Emperor of Earth. The Vedas were the source of the people’s spirituality/schools, politics, farming etc. All math, major sciences, the oldest, most accurate history, predictions that have come true (like of God’s great flood) or are coming or will come true etc. were originally stated in the Vedas. People who followed the Vedas were called Arya (sometimes with "n" at the end) which means noble in the sense of following the Vedas. The "Arya Invasion theory" is faulty speculation.
The Vedas warned that the % of people who follow the Vedas, truth, goodness, marriage vows, compassion for animals, etc. decline starting 5,000 years ago, with explanations on why it’d happened (but with a rare golden age that can happen possibly within our lifetime). The Earth's exact measurement as a globe, its 7 continents, Jesus Christ, the most detailed, accurate, advanced models of creation, evolution, etc all were 1st mentioned from Vedas.
Click the sub, bell icons on youtuber "Playitalready" for upcoming vids with more detail, sources, evidence, insight, n fun. For now, watch his old, ok vids.
I'm having a test on this tomorrow morning. Thanks.
Good luck! Hopefully the video helps!
Hey man love your videos, wondering if you could do a video detailing what a U.S. civil war would be like.
Yeah that would be a great video
💐THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the last age in which God saves man from the destruction of this old world"
(This may be a reminder for most people of God's words from Genesis: "Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness." Suppose God is saying that "let us" make man in "our " picture, then "ours" shows two or more; since He said "ours," then God is not only one. In this way, man begins to think generally of different persons, and from these words came the idea of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. At the time Moses wrote Genesis, it was after the creation of mankind following the creation of the world. In the beginning, when the world, Moses did not exist yet. And it was a long time before Moses wrote the Bible, so how could he possibly know what God said in heaven? He was unaware of how God created the world. What is written in the Old Testament is the work of Jehovah, a phase of the work of God Himself for ushering in the Age of Law. This is the work of God, where as He spoke, it happened, and as He commanded, it remained. When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. When man speaks of separate persons, does it not reflect God? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Doesn't the Spirit of God simply carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives?" Because of this, there is no distinction between persons.)
Almighty God said
This can be a REMINDER for most PEOPLE of GOD'S WORDS from GENESIS: "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." Suppose GOD says "we" will CREATE MAN in "our" IMAGE, then "we" SHOWS TWO or MORE; since He SAID "we," then GOD is NOT one. IN THIS WAY, MAN BEGAN TO THINK GENERALLY OF DIFFERENT PERSONS, AND FROM THESE WORDS HAD THE IDEA OF THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. What then does the Father look like? What does the Son look like? And what does the Holy Spirit look like? ☀️🙏
Could it be that the present man was made in the image of the one who was put together from the three? Then is the image of man like that of the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit? 🙏
WHICH of the persons of GOD is the image of MAN? This idea of MAN is ABSOLUTELY WRONG and NONSENSE! It can only separate one God from several Gods. 🙏
AT THE TIME Moses WROTE GENESIS, it was AFTER MANKIND WAS CREATED AFTER THE CREATION OF THE WORLD. In the BEGINNING, when the WORLD began, Moses did NOT exist. And IT TOOK A LONG TIME FOR MOSES TO WRITE THE BIBLE, so HOW could he possibly KNOW WHAT GOD SAID in HEAVEN?🙏☀️
He is UNCONSCIOUS of HOW GOD CREATED THE WORLD. 🙏
In the OLD TESTAMENT of the Bible, there is NO mention of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, only the TRUE GOD, JEHOVAH, is PERFORMING His WORK in ISRAEL. ☀️
He is CALLED by different NAMES in the CHANGING TIMES, but this DOESN'T PROVE that each NAME REFERES to a different PERSON. Therefore, then wouldn't there be countless persons of God? What is WRITTEN in the OLD TESTAMENT is the WORK of JEHOVAH, A PHASE of the WORK of GOD HIMSELF for the START of the Age of Law. This is GOD'S WORK, where ACCORDING to what He SPOKE, it happened, and ACCORDING to what He commanded, it REMAINS. 🙏💐
AT NO TIME DID JEHOVAH SAY HE WAS THE FATHER WHO WOULD COME TO EFFECT THE WORK, or did He even foretell the coming of the Son to redeem mankind. WHEN IT CAME TO THE TIME OF JESUS, it was only mentioned that GOD became MAN to REDEEM ALL MANKIND, NOT that the SON CAME. ☀️
Because the times are not the same and the work that God Himself carries out is also different, He has to carry out His work within different kingdoms. In this way, the identity He represents is also different. PEOPLE BELIEVE JEHOVAH IS THE FATHER OF JESUS, but JESUS DOESN'T REALLY ACKNOWLEDGE, saying: "We were never identified as Father and Son; I and the Father in heaven are one. The Father is in Me and I am in the Father; when men see the Son, they see the Father in heaven." ☀️😪
When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. By the time man attempts to explain, matters are complicated by the idea of different persons, as well as the relationship between Father, Son, and Spirit. WHEN MAN TALKS ABOUT separate persons, does it not reflect GOD? 🙏🔅
Man even ranks persons as first, second, and third; these are all mere human understandings, unworthy of reference, and utterly unreal! If you ask him: "How many are there in God?" He will say that God is the Trinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit: the one true God. If you ask him: "Who is the Father?" He will say: The Father is the Spirit of God in heaven; He rules over all, and He is the Lord of heaven." "Then is Jehovah the Spirit?" ☀️
He will say: "Yes!" If you ask him afterwards, "Who is the Son?" He will say that Jesus is the Son, anyway: "Then what is the story of Jesus? From whom did He come?" He will say: "Jesus was born of Mary through the shadowing of the Holy Spirit. " ☀️
"Then is not His substance also Spirit? Does His work also represent the Holy Spirit?
Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Now in the last days, it goes without saying that the Spirit still works; how did He become different persons? Doesn't the Spirit of God just carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives? Because of this, there is no difference between personas. 🙏
From "Is There a Trinity?"
Fulfilled in "In the beginning He was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). ... and "When I looked up, someone handed me a book wrapped in a scroll. I opened it and I read on both sides the prayers, lamentations, and curses." (Ezekiel 2:9-10). ... "His garment was stained with blood. He was called the "Word of God" (Rev. 19:13).
The kingdom He brought down and set up in the highest in the sky so that it can occupy His creation in the universe and engrave on it the entirety of His Holy name "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD" 💐 fulfillment of (Mat. 16:18) "And I say as for you, you are Peter, on top of this rock I will build my Church, that even the power of death will not prevail over it.". ... and "The Letter to the Church in Philadelphia" (Rev. 3:7-13). ... And fulfillment of "The New Jerusalem" 💫 "The Spirit enveloped me, and the angel led me to the top of a very high mountain. He showed Me Jerusalem, the Holy City, coming down from heaven from God." (Rev. 3:7-13). ... " For the time has come in the house of God for the beginning of judgment in the house of God." (1 Peter 4:17). ... It is fulfilled that God Himself is our Pastor in (Rev. 7:17) 💐
"For the Lamb in the midst of the throne will be their PASTOR. He will lead them to springs of life-giving water; and God will wipe away the tears from their eyes"
📩 Calling and leading the sheep of God to His glorious Throne "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD"💐 to submit again to His authority so that He will continue to teach, guide and protect even in plague, famine and wild animals will not be moved by it and completely win this final battle with the big red dragon!
"They say with a loud voice, "Salvation comes from the Lamb, and from our God who sits on the Throne!" (Rev. 7:10). ... and it will be fulfilled that will be established above the sky/TH-cam in (Isaiah 2: 2 / 9:6) "On the Last Day, the mountain on which Jehovah's temple stands will stand out above all the mountains. All nations will flock there. " . . . "For a baby boy is born to us. The rule will be given to him; and he shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Almighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace."✉️ 💌
Wonderful
Thank you! Cheers!
Good video, do one on Unitarian Universalist, Baha’i, Zen, Confucianism, Tao, Shinto, Jewish religion, Jainism, Christadelphians, Gnostics
Great ideas! I do have a video on World Religions you might like.
Thanks a lot 👍
You are welcome
Life is impermanent. To think things will stay the same just attachment. Buddhism is more focus on working on that self.
Wow, you are drawing a mosque instead of temple. And Indian map is not a correct one
Pakistan chali jaao
That temple looks like taj mahal, that's how muslim invasions affected us....
Will you making a video on Biblical Christianity?
Lotd buddha is great❤
nice vid
Buddhism is to ascetic for most ppl, thats also why Indian Kings and the masses chose Hinduism with it's devotional path, in favor of Buddhism. Also Hindu concepts and practises are increasing in the West whereas ppl in the West only have icon of Buddha at home but dont really practise the religion.
Buddhism isn't ascetic. Buddhism rejects both asceticism and hedonism, and accepts the middle way.
@@The_Alchemist_007 and still to ascetic for the lay men. Hence Hinduism is broader as it is suitable for everybody.
YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND INDIA WITHOUT JAINISM…. BUDDHISM IS AN OFFSHOOT OF JAINISM. Gautam Siddhartha (Buddha) followed the practices of Digambar Jain monks during his 6 years of searching (see MAJJHIMA NIKAYA). He studied under Uddaka Ramaputta who was a teacher of Jainism mentioned also in the Jain scriptures as well. Buddha’s “Middle Way” was basically a protest against Jain monastic practices. Buddha’s uncle Vappa was a Jain according to Buddhist scriptures. Buddha got a lot of his terminology directly from Jainism, such as Nirvana, Samyak, Arhat, Jina, 5 vows, etc. Buddha was born and raised in an area of India where Jainism was strong (foothills of the Himalayas). The list goes on.
One of the greatest Kings in indian history chose buddhism over hinduism.. even buddhism was the dominant religion in that era without the force.. but Hindus(brahmins) couldn't do anything so they adopted buddha as an avatar of Vishnu.. after extremist mughlas and Hindus buddhism vanished.. One of the main reasons why it was easy to vanish is buddhsim isn't forcefully practiced by people... every people got equal rights while hindusim teaches castes😢.. how some can be a sinner or a lower form of human because of their birth place/caste..? Karma doesn't work that way.. someone's birth caste is not how their whole life should be.. bad karma so bad place to birth.. that's it.. they too can achieve pure goals in life..but brahmins made a concept that someone's birth caste is their whole identity.. till death it is their sin..😢
@@user-ib2dq7ev5n Take a deep breath kid, and let’s analyze actual Buddha and core Buddhist works, (Tipiṭakas) rather than works of irrelevant and biased people. I have taken translations not my own, but from passionate scholars, who have tried their best to translate the verses politically correct. It is not ironical that still, the verses translated do reek of Buddha’s psyche.
“In the past, brahmins coupled only with brahmin women, not with non-brahmin women. But now brahmins couple with both brahmin women and non-brahmin women . Dogs, how ever, still couple only with female dogs, not with other female animals. This is the first ancient brahmin practice that is now seen among dogs but not among brahmins.”
Aṅguttaranikāya (tipiṭaka) 3.221, trans. Bikkhu Bodhi.
"And how, Doṇa, is a brahmin similar to a deva? Here, a brahmin is well born of both his maternal and paternal sides, of pure descent, unassailable and impeccable with respect to birth as far back as the seventh paternal generation. He lives the spiritual life of virginal celibacy for forty-eight years, studying the hymns. He then seeks a teacher's fee for his teacher solely in accordance with the Dhamma, not contrary to the Dhamma.
And what, Dona, is the Dhamma in that case? Not by agriculture, not by trade, not by raising cattle, not by archery, not by service to the king, not by a particular craft, but solely by wandering for alms without scorning the alms bowl. Having offered the teacher's fee to his teacher, he seeks a wife solely in accordance with the Dhamma, not contrary to the Dhamma. And what, Dona, is the Dhamma in that case? Not by buying and selling, [he takes] only a brahmin woman given to him by the pouring of water. He couples only with a brahmin woman, not with a khattiya woman, a vessa woman , a sudda woman , or a candala woman, nor with a woman from a family of hunters, bamboo workers, chariot makers, or flower scavengers…”
Aṅguttara, 3.226 trans. Bhikku Bodhi
In the following verses, he calls such fallen Brahmins who don’t observe moral and racial purity as “caṇḍālas of Brahmins”. Aah, so non racist.
Could anyone locate such a verse saying this explicitly from any pre Buddhist scripture in India?
One often quoted (cherry picked) text is Assalāyana sutta where Buddha accuses Brahmins of claiming themselves to be high in caste, and counters a teen reverent Brahmin boy Assalāyana with his always amazing sentences. An anti Brahmanic India of twentieth century and forth saw much of the verses as against Brahmin supremacy. But, what does Buddha believe Brahmins should have did better? His tactics to convert Brahmins is though, always amazing.
(Assalāyana) : Is that son born of the brahmin prince and warrior maiden, according to the father known a `brahmin' or according to the mother known a `warrior? Good Gotama, that son born of the Brahmin prince and the warrior maiden, according to the father should be known a `brahmin' and according to the mother a `warrior.
(Buddha) : Assalàyana, to a mare and donkey a mule is born, according to the mother should it be known a'horse' or according to the father should it be known a `donkey'?
(Assalāyana) : Good Gotama, it's from a thoroughbred that a pony is born. Now I see the difference, in the earlier examples I did not see any difference.
Wow. This logic had deep entry into contemporary societies.
It would be interesting to link why non Brahmanic communities in India took to strict endogamy, while Brahmins were ready to marry any other community, or even accept them into varna system for a social good.
It is so funny to read the Sutta in Majjhima Nikāya. The Buddhists pester a poor teen boy whom they speak of as learned in three Vedas, for a debate with Buddha, of a claim which Buddha himself makes. Even after Assalāyana says several times that Gotama who speaks Dhamma can’t be countered, the Buddhists still force him, and he comes to Buddha with a group of Brahmins and shares a humble and polite talk. Assalāyana says, for the sake of debate that Brahmins say they are pure castes, others aren’t. (Same thing repeated, burdened on the Brahmins by Buddha everywhere) To which Buddha provides his ready made examples to show how Brahmins are impure. His statements start with this (2.149) :
Now, Assalayana, the brahmin women are seen having their periods, becoming pregnant, giving birth, and giving suck. And yet those who are born from the wombs of the brahmin women say thus: 'Brahmins are the highest caste...brahmins alone are the sons of Brahma, the offspring of Brahma, born of his mouth, born of Brahma, created by Brahma, heirs of Brahma.
This one beginning statement is enough to see what kind of purity Buddha had in his mind. Though he becomes more vocal of “social equality” in the forthcoming sentences, to establish that purification ceremonies must be for all, and not just Brahmins. But his this attitude was only when against what he thought himself as the claims of Brahmins. Similar to how contemporary Brahmin scholars themselves “bashed” Samaṇas in their works. Buddha wasn’t any different from them. But surely, Buddha attributes one thing to Brahmins as their claim, them being “fairer”. This stuff is absent in all Brahmanic scriptures. Rather, it also cuts the way to understand Buddha’s psyche of what he thought inside as superior.
At certain times, Buddha would speak more openly of Kshatriyas to be superior to Brahmins. It is not a secret that Buddhism was mouthpiece of Kshatriyan supremacy which wanted to enter not just its stronghold of ruling, but also economy and religion.
In the Ambattha sutta, a young kid doesn’t apparently “venerate Buddha” to the extent what Buddha wanted. On asking, Ambattha is shown to reply that Brahmins usually show such kind of respects only to another Brahmin, but not to lowly people, “dark fellows” (that is a Buddhan fantasy) and so on. To which Buddha replies Ambattha is ill bred. A triggered kid, says that Shakyas are the menial ones who don’t even honour any Brahmin or pay respect to them. Buddha becomes more triggered, as Shakya is his own clan.
A triggered Buddha says :
And what family do you then, Ambattha, belong to?'
'I am a Kanhâyana.'
'Yes, but if one were to follow up your ancient name and lineage, Ambattha, on the father's and the mother's side, it would appear that the Sâkyas were once your masters, and that you are the offspring of one of their slave girls. But the Sâkyas trace their line back to Okkâka the king ….
…
Now Okkâka had a slave girl called Disâ. She gave birth to a black baby. And no sooner was it born than the little black thing said, "Wash me, mother. Bathe me, mother. Set me free, mother, of this dirt. So shall I be of use to you."
'Now just as now, Ambattha, people call devils "devils," so then they (Śākyas) called devils "black fellows" (kanhe). And they said: "This fellow spoke as soon as he was born. 'Tis a black thing (kanha) that is born, a devil has been born!" And that is the origin, Ambattha, of the Kanhayanas. He was the ancestor of the Kanhâyanas. And thus is it, Ambattha, that if one were to follow up your ancient name and lineage, on the father's and on the mother's side, it would appear that the Sâkyas were once your masters, and that you are the offspring of one of their slave girls.'
That was a bold attack by Buddha on this young person. And he was asked to counter this legend. Which he couldn’t. 😅
Now go somewhere else kid to spread youre ignorant propoganda against Hinduism and the Brahmins. 🤣🤣🤣
Some info guys..
SANATAN DHARMA (Hinduism) is a pluralistic religion and a way of life which accepts one god ( formless,cannot be described) with many forms ( shiva , vishnu ,brahma,shakti etc ) and god also decended on earth (ram and krishna) to give us the message and importance of dharma...........Athiest and agnostics can also practice the religion as we have many philosophies what matters and unites every sect of hinduism is *that we should follow our dharma
*Respect every scripture and vedas are most divine scripture of hindus....
Many more things like dualism,non dualism ,nature worship etc.....
Sir, I have a question, is the Japanese religion Shintoism also a part of Hinduism because Shinto Gods are very similar to Hindu Gods?
No, Shintoism have nothing to do with Hinduism but Taiwanese Taoism Gods are believed have some Prototypes from Hinduism
@@hugocheng6243 Sir, you have not heard much about Shinto religion and Hindu religion, I have been studying for a long time and I know that the names of many Shinto Gods and their functions are the same. Like Lord Kangiten Also Known As Binayaka-Ten Is Looks Like Hindu God Lord Ganesha Also Known As Vinayaka,
And Yenma The God Of Death In Shinto Religion Is Looks Like Yama The God Of Death In Hindu Religion
Kind of. Eastern writers usually called hinduism and shintuism and intoism in their writings.
yes this was wow
☸
🙏
😇
I wouldn't say that meditation is central to Buddhism, but just one integrated part of the Eightfold Path. Most Buddhists worldwide don't even have a meditation practice. It's something that became amplified to the point of being synonymous with Buddhism only when Zen, which _is_ heavily focused on meditation, came to the West, and people took Zen to be what _all_ Buddhism looks like.
Its funny how Buddhism has been warped to suit different cultures. For example one of the rules of the 8 fold part is Right Conduct or Action: That means no killing or injuring any creature, no taking what is not given, no sexual misconduct, no material desires. But some Buddhists do eat meat which is wrong.
@@ashleysilver5594 Eating meat is not prohibited in every Buddhist tradition. There's a reason for that in some schools such as Theravada tradition.
Very accurate statement!
Yes, exactly. A kind of liberal, non supernatural based Zen teaching is what became famous in US, but that doesn't represent Buddhism at all. Most Buddhism speaks a lot about demons, hells, ghosts, which Zen largely leaves out.
Even budha is 9th avatara of Vishnu in dhashaavathara
😂😂😂😂
Buddha: Pagal Hai Kya? 🤣🤣
That's different buddha. Not Gautam buddha
nice drawing;)
🖌
Thank you so much 😀
@@vasudevanbalasubramanian8572 that’s not grounds for reporting a video. This is an illustrated video and I do my best to make it accurate but of course it’s not perfect. Go ahead and report it, but it won’t do anything in a petty situation as this. If you continue to harass me and my channel, I will report you however. Your choice.
These religions actually make you think and get your brain going instead of just following a premade plan.
Buddhism came from Hinduism as Gautama was a Brahman. He reached enlightenment through Hindu meditation etc. and taught what worked for him to reach moksha. He never set out to create a new religion. Also this video acts like liberation and moksha are separate things which is obviously not correct. If Buddha came up in the Catholic Church he would be a Saint, but still a Christian. Instead he was a Hindu who became a saint but a whole religion was made. Buddhahood is Shivahood and vice versa there is no difference. The real buddist were the Mahasiddhas and Tantrics who share the same Tantric philosophy as their Hindu Tantric counterparts. Om ah hum vajra guru padma siddhe hum, Om Shiva Gorak Aadesh🙏🏼🔱
Buddha: Abe pagal Hai Kya?? Kabhi tipitaka padhe Hai?? 🤣🤣
A deity is a god or goddess
Can you do feudalism vs capitalism
Feudalism is a great idea!
@@IllustratetoEducatedepends on how you say that...
We hindus not only proud our religion hindu means india.. And we proud buddisum strted in india🇮🇳👌
BUDDHISM IS AN OFFSHOOT OF JAINISM
Prince Siddhartha known as Buddha was an Emperor's Son and was well versed in Vedas.
He was A Hindu Yogi and difference was he broke Social Laws of Hinduism where Life is divided in 4 Varnas and 4 Ashrams
4 Varnas are Classes not Castes
(Caste is a Portuguese word Casta)
1.Brahmins = Intellectual class
2.Kshatriya=Administrative class
3.Vaishya =Entrepreneur class
4.Sudras=Working service class
5.Dal (out class) =Underworld and Mafia. Mainly under target by Gvt.
4 Ashrams in Hinduism
1.Brahmacharya=Student life
2.Grihasta=Married life
3.Vanprasta =Retired life
4.Sanyas=Retire from all social obligations and work to seek God.
The Whole Globe follows this above system whether in America or Pakistan or China, above 4 Varnas and 4 Ashrams are followed world wide.
Buddha introduced Young unmarried boys of as low as 15 years and 25 Years into Sanyas Ashram.
This destroyed social fabric and caused a Silent, Peaceful Genocide of a entire Race of Educated and Administrative elite leaving reproduction to lowest classes like tribals in forests and the Underworld gangsters or Spoilt brats from elite classes.
The Masses of Class people just disappeared as All became monks.
In Hinduism this Monk business is allowed only after you have passed the Responsibility of life including procreation of next generation and getting your children married.
All So Called Buddhist actually follow Hindu social order only as strict adherence to Buddha means, No babies and only Run after Nirvana.
Life is not misery but a training.
Example :- In Hinduism Pain in Gym =Tapasya to gain HE Body
In Buddhism, They want to escape the pain yet want the HE body.
Hence in Practice, Hinduism gained.
Buddha in Hinduism is a Divine soul and his philosophy inspires us, but ultimately it's the Gita that drives our lives.
Escape from pain into Nirvana is basis of Buddhism
Pain in life is a part of soul purification and is necessary, as Gold Rod is heated and melted to become ornaments.
Escape Pain =Buddhism
Experience Pain on path to perfection =Hinduism
The Das
One has Gods, a number of them. The other renounces anything as being of godly in nature.
Actually, Gautam Buddha was not the first Buddha born. There were 27 buddhas before him, in different time periods. There names and time periods can be found in the buddhist religious texts. So Buddhism is lot more ancient than many people realize. The next Buddha is Maitreya buddha.
No religion is perfect in its understanding of the divine. There are flaws in all of them. That's why a spiritual journey should be taken alone. Find your own truth, not the truth of someone else.
I hope they become the 1st largest religions in the world.
well i heard buddhism is copied form jainism
So they’re like complete opposites of each other.
There is also concept of Hell (Nark) and Heaven (Swarg) in Hinduism...
Nope , swarg just simply means where gods live and narak means where the devil lives , normal people don't go there , the soul is reincarnated untill it gets moksha and then stops existing in these merely human forms and become one with this infinite universe
@@futureminds9742until the reincarnation happens souls parks at 7 astral layers according to Karmas
@@futureminds9742not devil's sinners undergoing punishment.
@@futureminds9742 bro according to vaishnava sect there are 14 worlds, 7heaven and 7 hells and svarga log is one of the heaven.
In puranas not upanisads
Hell is considered as a state of mind.@@bharatyaswaraj5641
It's not 4000old, it is way older ..
The peaceful lasting end is idea of true death from the cycle. Which basically means you’re done living completely, no more next life. You can achieve it in any life. But life is beautiful, why would you want to leave? That is the theory, but what if you can’t truly die and you just come back in another life? Or what if you’re cast out in to a dark abyss and still aware? And now you’re alone in darkness? Well I guess you get so bored that you create a whole new universe. The end isn’t the end. Life is a vicious never ending cycle. Best to create paradise here on earth where all life can thrive and live in peace and harmony. No amount of technology can escape this reality. Can we even prove if Buddha actually left? What if I’m him?
How can Hinduism be polytheistic and monotheistic?
Hinduism believes in one god (monotheism) and the other deities are manifestation of the one god (polytheism)
There is no "versus". Buddhism is just another sect of Sanatan Dharma which the west calls "Hindusism" (Hindu is a geographic label meaning of the Indus area). Other sects are Vaishnavism, Shaivism, Shaktism, Sikhism, Jainism etc much like Lutheran, Baptist, Calvinist, Orthodox Greek, Orthodox Russian are called "Christianity". The faiths evolving in the Indian Subcontinent are all based on Karma, Dharma and Moksha along with yoga and meditation which no other faith in the world shares. Sanatan Dharma means Eternal Law.
Buddhism is vast as hinduism. There are lots of schools in buddhism like in christianity.
YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND INDIA WITHOUT JAINISM…. BUDDHISM IS AN OFFSHOOT OF JAINISM. Gautam Siddhartha (Buddha) followed the practices of Digambar Jain monks during his 6 years of searching (see MAJJHIMA NIKAYA). He studied under Uddaka Ramaputta who was a teacher of Jainism mentioned also in the Jain scriptures as well. Buddha’s “Middle Way” was basically a protest against Jain monastic practices. Buddha’s uncle Vappa was a Jain according to Buddhist scriptures. Buddha got a lot of his terminology directly from Jainism, such as Nirvana, Samyak, Arhat, Jina, 5 vows, etc. Buddha was born and raised in an area of India where Jainism was strong (foothills of the Himalayas). The list goes on.
In Dhammapada verse 279, the Buddha clearly said "sabbe dhamma anatta" which means all dhamma lacks an unchanging self atta/atman". You still wanna claim Buddha is a branch of vedic religions? The Buddha himself had a lot of arguments and debates with Brahmanists because his teachings were opposite to the Vedas.
@@minthura9053obviously gautham wanted to make a new religion how can he keep everything same as Hinduism?? So thats one of the differentiating point between both religions!! He took points form Hinduism and modified it according to his own thoughts and created Buddhism!! Even Sikhism is similar to Hinduism but they also added thier own 1:08 twist like Buddhism, if Buddhism is exactly same a Hinduism why did it get new name ?? Common sense there should be some differentiating factors to make it mew religion!
The parable of those who reject Faith* is as if one were to shout like a goat- herd, to things that listen to nothing but calls and cries: deaf, dumb, and blind, they are void of wisdom.
Holy Quran, chapter 2, Al Baqarah (The Heifer) verse 171.
* Islam
Allah Subhana Wata'ala; Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
So is Hinduisms version of karma the reason why the caste system is so ingrained in Indian culture? They think that if someone was born an "untouchable", it's because they deserve it?
The caste system was created to divide the roles into society just like in Japanese culture where shogun decides everything. But later when normal people started becoming rules the empire fell apart and mostly the children of previous rules faced a problem now to change this caste system was totally changed by pandits who sit in rulers court so that normal people won't be able to do Or rise against higher society people. bhagvate gita holy book for hindus foremost doesn't even has a single word name caste or anything related to that .
India map is wrong 👽
Buddhism is not at all part of hinduism the later is very recent. Those who really wants to know about buddhism should read ambedkar writings and western scholars like bryan levman book pali and buddhism.
And asc e tic fi g ures be for e and ea rly bu d i sm by de guyter
So they both believe we technically live in a matrix....
Buddhism, like all knowledge, is actually a branch of the Vedas (what u incorrectly call "Hinduism" n incorrectly claim teaches a birth based caste system when it never mentioned that system except when it correctly predicted society would fall into it). Thus, other than Buddhism not mentioning a creator or permanence, all Buddhist teachings I ever read, are the same as the Vedic.
Buddha did talk about Demigods of the Vedas (AKA Angels), heaven, n hell. However, in 5th Veda it correctly predicted God would incarnate to help animals and, "...appear as Lord Buddha, the son of Añjanā, in the province of Gayā, just for the purpose of deluding those who are envious of the faithful theist."
4,000 years? The Vedas were composed OVER 5,000 years ago, but were taught through word of mouth BEFORE that, for countless millennia (to societies that were more advanced than us). Vedas have a history of 4.3 billion Earth years, which they teach is 1 day on a top planet in the universe. Check out those roughly 10,000 year old cities found miles from India in the Ocean (reported by sources like the BBC).
Over 5,000 years ago there was a great war involving the powerful rulers of Earth, with the victor becoming basically the Emperor of Earth. The Vedas were the source of the people’s spirituality/schools, politics, farming etc. All math, major sciences, the oldest, most accurate history, predictions that have come true (like of God’s great flood) or are coming or will come true etc. were originally stated in the Vedas. People who followed the Vedas were called Arya (sometimes with "n" at the end) which means noble in the sense of following the Vedas. The "Arya Invasion theory" is faulty speculation.
The Vedas warned that the % of people who follow the Vedas, truth, goodness, marriage vows, compassion for animals, etc. decline starting 5,000 years ago, with explanations on why it’d happened (but with a rare golden age that can happen possibly within our lifetime). The Earth's exact measurement as a globe, its 7 continents, Jesus Christ etc. were 1st mentioned in Vedas (e.g. 5th Veda: specifically, the Puranas). Distant planets, Relativity, & the most detailed, accurate, advanced models of creation, evolution, all originated from Vedas.
Click the sub, bell icons on youtuber "Playitalready" for upcoming vids with more detail, sources, evidence, insight, n fun. For now, watch his old, ok vids.
Good knowledge. I agree with most of it and definitely appreciate your effort to write it and also thanks.
@@Quasarrr I appreciate your thanks. I'll try to be open minded to any disagreements u post here or on Playitalready's upcoming, insightful vids. the Buddha did say follow things based on reason n i gotta agree with that.🙏
Modern Hinduism is a later development. Mahabarat, Bhagawath Githa, Valmiki's Ramayana are not older than Buddhissm. Brahamanism developed modern Hinduism to challenge Buddhism and survive. Brahamin Chanakaya's captured Magadha kindom, and Killed Buddhist kings, and they tried to change the history.
@@smlanka4u I'm confused why u ignored everything i said, including facts i touched upon, like how i cited a city mentioned in the Vedas that even the BBC said was recently found n dated as over 10,000 years old, n how i quoted 5th Veda (which Gita n Mahabharata are part of) that correctly predicted Buddha, n how i offer more evidence, etc. n instead,
u just make up stuff which, even if some of it is true, u offer 0 proof for?
did u read my 1st comment? what if everything in it is true?
@@smlanka4u hehe so you say the Vedas were written by magadha kings and all the polytheistic culture n puraanas of different dieties were written by magadha kings. Even the temples were constructed by magadha kings? Looks someone read alot of Ambedkar twisted history. 🤣🤣🤣
Buddhism is older than "Hinduism" which was a creation of the British. Buddha was also from Nepal, native Nepalese looked "Mongoloid" not Indian. One of the reasons why Buddhism prospered in East and Southeast Asia is due to the similarity of phenotypes between the original Nepalese and other Asiatic peoples.
The oldest archaeological evidence through carbon dating proves Indus valley as the oldest evidence for a civilization which is much more older than when Gautam Buddha was born. There is minimum gap of 1000+ years with Buddhism being newer. Buddhism itself states that it rejects vedas. Which means vedas are older. That is enough proof to suggest that Hinduism which follows vedas is older than Buddhism.
Bro buddhism is older than hinduism read pali and buddhism by bryan levman and he was shudra and at the border of aryan and non aryan culture.
@@OSY_PB_ATHEIST Siddharth Gautama, the founder of Buddhism was born after the vedas were already into existence. Buddhism rejects vedas that one doesn't need to perform rituals to attain Moksh. Read in more details about why Buddhism came into existence and when vedas came into existence.
@@mohitpatel9974
Do not argue with me argue with the author that I mentioned. And about vedas there were no archaelogical evidence of it such as manuscripts etc prior to common era. And since buddhism rejected ritualism obviously it rejetcted and will reject all the rituals whether in the past or the future.
@@OSY_PB_ATHEIST thank you for proving the point that that Buddhism rejected ritualism. Which is the exact point you need to understand. The ritual that are followed in Hinduism which is actually based on Sanatana Dharma is older than Buddhism. What archeological evidence do you want when you have already accepted that Buddhism rejects ritualism and the Hindus follow the same ritualism, which were being performed before Buddhism was born
Oh yeah... India map is wrong.
so are all the other countries’ maps if you wanna get technical. no one cares about minute details and small island territories
@@EpicGamer-zv3ck I don't need to care of other countries when the video is over India. That's called context.
Nice but Hinduism has not caste system
Hinduism is hardly 200 years , when britishers came india there was no hinduism here. Now they claim 10000years old which is a fake.
bro graduated from tiktok
1949
bro high on sewer water
In Hinduism they worship statue and they believe taking bath in River clear there sins in Buddhism we don’t worship statue or we wash our sins by river .
The core of Hinduism says - no sins can be washed away. The effects can be diluted but for that one has to perform penance by performing good karmas. Those who think that their sins are washed away are just fooling themselves. One can only wash their sins by penance (accepting punishment) or asking for forgiveness from the one they have wronged.
+ The point of statue is not to worship but to provide an image when one performs mantras or meditation. A mind without a focal point has a very high chance of getting distracted, these idols exist to provide an image for not having that distraction. Most rishis/sages of the Vedic era didn't sit in front of any idol but in front of fire. So this is false info.
Thank god im not an idol worshipper.
Only way is Jesus, no multiple paths or mythologies, no enlightenment because knowledge is not enough.
lul buddha has more archealogical evidence han your jesus lol
👍 cool
Wrong information😅
How?
Good information, but watching the writing on screen is very distracting and annoying! I will never watch your channel again!
Appreciate the feedback but has anyone ever told you that if you don’t have anything nice (or constructive) to say don’t say anything at all? My channel is not for everyone, I get that.
Hindism is part of mahayani buddhist
All hindu god also mahayani buddhist god
But many indian brahamis people claim
Hindusm is older then buddhism
But this is totally wrong
You cannot fond any evidence of hindism
before buddha
even before samrath asok
I want to challenge all people
Give me proof
before buddha any archeaology evidence of hindusm. .
Buddha himself is the biggest proof go ahead
There was no Hindu in India during Buddha time.
Evidence: not a single mention of Hindu word in Asoka inscriptions all over India.
Put Buddha was a khattiya (not Kshatriya) why? Because according to digha nikaya khattiya means lord of the fields (Jo kheto ka Malik ho) and not some Varna identity shit of kshtriya in Brahmanism (Hinduism).
During Buddha time no Varna system existed.
@@Manoj-vp5in then how buddha get opportunity to reject Vedas and theist ideas ? Lol
Hinduism is older than buddhism. Use Google
Rigveda Samhita was itself 1500 and 1200 BC older. Even more than buddhism. If it is so then how buddha get opportunity to reject Vedas????
Suppose Vedas is essential material of Hinduism ...
Hinduism name is new.. but considering buddhism is older than hinduism then it's totally invalid...
Buddha born into kshatriya family in shakya clan....
He dad was prince itself. Many gurus come and meet him so how you can say hinduism didn't existed before buddha....
And yeah. Buddhism reformed as a non-theistic way to attain nirvana by meditation....
If hinduism really didn't existed on that time so how he learn this concept???
@@Manoj-vp5in caste system is approach by the later Vedic period corrupt Brahmins 🤦 get knowledge first... You must be Neo-buddhist or with no knowledge
Modern Hinduism is not older than Buddhism, and it was developed later to help survive Brahamanism and challenge Buddhism.
True! This video unreliable
bro graduated from taco bell toilet
You are a fool. Buddhism came from Hinduism! Siddartha who you call Buddha was a Hindu, all his teachings are from the teachings of Hinduism, the word Buddha itself is a SANSKRIT word which is the ancient language of India, so how can you ever say Buddhism came before Hinduism, you are evil! Stop spreading propaganda!
In your nightmares
Buddhism mirrored Sanatan Dharma
Personally, I side with the Hindus, primarily over the lack of recognition of an ultimate "God/Source/Oneness" by the Buddhist. Nor do I believe the journey of the soul is based on repetitious suffering that repeats with each incarnation and can never be stopped. Once you are enlightened enough to rise above suffering, why does the Soul need to come back to relearn the same lesson over and over?
Of course this video oversimplifies hinduism and Buddhism to stay short and so it doesn't explain everything in detail and leads to some misunderstanding
But what Buddhism is teaching is that everything is impermanent and everything exists in interdependence with the rest (a tree for example doesn't exist by itself, it needs soil, sun, water etc... Same logic applies to us and our "self") so there is a sense of Oneness in Buddhism, we just say this oneness is empty of definitive or unchanging nature. that's why we don't believe in a soul as a form of permanent self going from life to another, we talk about an impermanent phenomenon going through death and rebirth over and over because of karma (actions that produce causality), and this Samsara is filled with suffering, not by essence but because of our own approach of it, because we keep trying to possess, reject, or ignore things that are impermanent and inevitably get out of our reach, the suffering comes from this clinging to impermanent phenomenon.
So Buddhism doesn't say that a soul comes back to relearn over and over the same lesson, I don't understand how you reach that conclusion.
Lord Buddha taught about the cycle of suffering but more importantly he taught about how to break free from it, this is the four Noble Truths: the suffering, the origin of suffering, the cessation of suffering, and the path towards that cessation
@@epoflacko108 I got that from the video, but to be honest, I really don't care enough to watch it again to tell you where in the video. But I certainly wouldn't have come up with it on my own. Best wishes!
Once you are enlightened enough to rise above suffering, why does the Soul need to come back to relearn the same lesson over and over? Because there is a ladder created by karma you can get to the top tier thanks by karma but the karma will be burned and you will fall to the lower tiers again. In buddhism top tier is occupied by gods and titans but they must abide karma and they will burn out the karma and go back to the lower realms look for term Bhavacakra on wiki. Everything has explanation in the karma wheel breaking system.
@@jozefbania I really appreciate the response!!! I read threw it quickly.but I'm walking out the door. When I get back later I'll read it again more carefully. But before I left, I just wanted to thank you for responding!!
br ambedkar was also first so called low cast hindu
The oldest religion is islam Christian and Judisuim i respect all religion❤
Hinduism is based on caste system, whereas, Buddhism oppose caste system and therefore even Dr Br AMBEDKAR who is father of Indian Constitution and one of the greatest social reformer which India has produced left hinduism and embraced Buddhism.
Infact hindus r responsible to end buddhism in India. Pushmitra sung in 185 bce killed last buddhist emperor.
Shashanka burned baudhi tree at Baudh gaya. He even destroyed buddhas footprints which were located at varanasi. Read Vincent Smiths book "Early history of India".
Hinduism doesn't have a caste system it's verna which was created by corrupt pandits who wanted wealth from rulers in order to keep the rulers bloodline ongoing and ruling nation. Bhagvate gita holiest hindu book find a word which says caste or anything related to caste I am ready to convert to Buddhism.
2 . Dr br ambedkar never converted to Buddhism in his own words he said both Buddhism and hindus are part of the same tree. 3. after the death of gautam buddam india started becoming Buddhism and then Acharya ramanuja who went all over india having debate about it and always proved it hinduism is greater in every single way. There was no killing of Buddhism in India It like killing their own people
The last Buddhist emperor was against vedas and was the weakest king in the Asoka dynasty who was against protection of dharma ☸️. He was killed by his army commander who was a Kshatriya.
Let me ask you something about how Buddhism ended in the majority nation of afghanistan, Bangladesh, indonesia , Philippines and malaysia surprisingly these all nations are islamic now why? Buddhism in Afghanistan was 100% population once upon a time and today afghanistan is not even 0.001 percentage Buddhism how and why
Voilent Caste system,racism,superstitions,sati system,dowey system,hate against women are the components of Hinduism
Soooo, just basic humanity then?
@@GD-tn3ezHinduism has female goddesses who are revered so there is respect for woman. Sati is not mentioned in scriptures. If you saw oct 7th of what Hamas did, that is what happened in Mughal invasion and thus sati as a practice was born before that it didn't exist. Sati is another name of Shiva's wife the trinity of Hinduism. So sati is a name of goddess, before invasion it was a name only and not a practice. Caste system doesn't exist, Varna system is totally different. Varna वर्ण means character/sound equivalent is what you call alphabet.
Varnamaala वर्णमाला - character chain
Varnaviched वर्णविच्छेद - character spelling (like breaking a word and spelling each individual letter)
Varnasamyog वर्णसंयोग - character combination
Varna is a root word thus it retains its meaning in other words without its meaning being changed so caste is a false translation.
It is laughable to think that racism is components of Hinduism when most of Hindus are brown, and also some of the goddesses are dark coloured like Maa Kaali (adishakti avatar)
Components of Hinduism are 4 Purusarthas, 7 Main chakras, 3 Gunas, 4 yogas (paths to salvation) don't spread your thoughts based on half knowledge.
One started in Indian Subcontinent
Another in Nepal
It did not mean anything then.
@@ensys1000
Well it does Now
@@daredevil6145 To whom?
One started in the Indian subcontinent and another is unknown. If you wonder which is what, it's budhdhism that's started in Indian subcontinent and the other one is Sanathana Dharma.
@@Quasarrr you're right too but -
When Hinduism started, it was a Whole Subcontinent
Buddha was born in Lumbini Kingdom... now in Nepal. Thats just it
Not Hinduism and barhamism
I'm also Indian but i believes hindu god not exist.the real god is Buddhist. N hindu copd the Buddhism
😂ok ppl can believe wrongly
Actually you are right, we are being taught wrongly in history. History books are based on brahmanism and colonialism, we need to check historial evidence.
So sigma Indian bro
Wrong
Right
@@Tringapore-Singapore 😂
Advaita Vedânta is panenthéist.
Allah Hu Akbar
Ok
Hi
En büyük Allah ❤❤❤❤
💐THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the last age in which God saves man from the destruction of this old world"
(This may be a reminder for most people of God's words from Genesis: "Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness." Suppose God is saying that "let us" make man in "our " picture, then "ours" shows two or more; since He said "ours," then God is not only one. In this way, man begins to think generally of different persons, and from these words came the idea of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. At the time Moses wrote Genesis, it was after the creation of mankind following the creation of the world. In the beginning, when the world, Moses did not exist yet. And it was a long time before Moses wrote the Bible, so how could he possibly know what God said in heaven? He was unaware of how God created the world. What is written in the Old Testament is the work of Jehovah, a phase of the work of God Himself for ushering in the Age of Law. This is the work of God, where as He spoke, it happened, and as He commanded, it remained. When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. When man speaks of separate persons, does it not reflect God? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Doesn't the Spirit of God simply carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives?" Because of this, there is no distinction between persons.)
Almighty God said
This can be a REMINDER for most PEOPLE of GOD'S WORDS from GENESIS: "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." Suppose GOD says "we" will CREATE MAN in "our" IMAGE, then "we" SHOWS TWO or MORE; since He SAID "we," then GOD is NOT one. IN THIS WAY, MAN BEGAN TO THINK GENERALLY OF DIFFERENT PERSONS, AND FROM THESE WORDS HAD THE IDEA OF THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. What then does the Father look like? What does the Son look like? And what does the Holy Spirit look like? ☀️🙏
Could it be that the present man was made in the image of the one who was put together from the three? Then is the image of man like that of the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit? 🙏
WHICH of the persons of GOD is the image of MAN? This idea of MAN is ABSOLUTELY WRONG and NONSENSE! It can only separate one God from several Gods. 🙏
AT THE TIME Moses WROTE GENESIS, it was AFTER MANKIND WAS CREATED AFTER THE CREATION OF THE WORLD. In the BEGINNING, when the WORLD began, Moses did NOT exist. And IT TOOK A LONG TIME FOR MOSES TO WRITE THE BIBLE, so HOW could he possibly KNOW WHAT GOD SAID in HEAVEN?🙏☀️
He is UNCONSCIOUS of HOW GOD CREATED THE WORLD. 🙏
In the OLD TESTAMENT of the Bible, there is NO mention of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, only the TRUE GOD, JEHOVAH, is PERFORMING His WORK in ISRAEL. ☀️
He is CALLED by different NAMES in the CHANGING TIMES, but this DOESN'T PROVE that each NAME REFERES to a different PERSON. Therefore, then wouldn't there be countless persons of God? What is WRITTEN in the OLD TESTAMENT is the WORK of JEHOVAH, A PHASE of the WORK of GOD HIMSELF for the START of the Age of Law. This is GOD'S WORK, where ACCORDING to what He SPOKE, it happened, and ACCORDING to what He commanded, it REMAINS. 🙏💐
AT NO TIME DID JEHOVAH SAY HE WAS THE FATHER WHO WOULD COME TO EFFECT THE WORK, or did He even foretell the coming of the Son to redeem mankind. WHEN IT CAME TO THE TIME OF JESUS, it was only mentioned that GOD became MAN to REDEEM ALL MANKIND, NOT that the SON CAME. ☀️
Because the times are not the same and the work that God Himself carries out is also different, He has to carry out His work within different kingdoms. In this way, the identity He represents is also different. PEOPLE BELIEVE JEHOVAH IS THE FATHER OF JESUS, but JESUS DOESN'T REALLY ACKNOWLEDGE, saying: "We were never identified as Father and Son; I and the Father in heaven are one. The Father is in Me and I am in the Father; when men see the Son, they see the Father in heaven." ☀️😪
When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. By the time man attempts to explain, matters are complicated by the idea of different persons, as well as the relationship between Father, Son, and Spirit. WHEN MAN TALKS ABOUT separate persons, does it not reflect GOD? 🙏🔅
Man even ranks persons as first, second, and third; these are all mere human understandings, unworthy of reference, and utterly unreal! If you ask him: "How many are there in God?" He will say that God is the Trinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit: the one true God. If you ask him: "Who is the Father?" He will say: The Father is the Spirit of God in heaven; He rules over all, and He is the Lord of heaven." "Then is Jehovah the Spirit?" ☀️
He will say: "Yes!" If you ask him afterwards, "Who is the Son?" He will say that Jesus is the Son, anyway: "Then what is the story of Jesus? From whom did He come?" He will say: "Jesus was born of Mary through the shadowing of the Holy Spirit. " ☀️
"Then is not His substance also Spirit? Does His work also represent the Holy Spirit?
Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Now in the last days, it goes without saying that the Spirit still works; how did He become different persons? Doesn't the Spirit of God just carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives? Because of this, there is no difference between personas. 🙏
From "Is There a Trinity?"
Fulfilled in "In the beginning He was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). ... and "When I looked up, someone handed me a book wrapped in a scroll. I opened it and I read on both sides the prayers, lamentations, and curses." (Ezekiel 2:9-10). ... "His garment was stained with blood. He was called the "Word of God" (Rev. 19:13).
The kingdom He brought down and set up in the highest in the sky so that it can occupy His creation in the universe and engrave on it the entirety of His Holy name "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD" 💐 fulfillment of (Mat. 16:18) "And I say as for you, you are Peter, on top of this rock I will build my Church, that even the power of death will not prevail over it.". ... and "The Letter to the Church in Philadelphia" (Rev. 3:7-13). ... And fulfillment of "The New Jerusalem" 💫 "The Spirit enveloped me, and the angel led me to the top of a very high mountain. He showed Me Jerusalem, the Holy City, coming down from heaven from God." (Rev. 3:7-13). ... " For the time has come in the house of God for the beginning of judgment in the house of God." (1 Peter 4:17). ... It is fulfilled that God Himself is our Pastor in (Rev. 7:17) 💐
"For the Lamb in the midst of the throne will be their PASTOR. He will lead them to springs of life-giving water; and God will wipe away the tears from their eyes"
📩 Calling and leading the sheep of God to His glorious Throne "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD"💐 to submit again to His authority so that He will continue to teach, guide and protect even in plague, famine and wild animals will not be moved by it and completely win this final battle with the big red dragon!
"They say with a loud voice, "Salvation comes from the Lamb, and from our God who sits on the Throne!" (Rev. 7:10). ... and it will be fulfilled that will be established above the sky/TH-cam in (Isaiah 2: 2 / 9:6) "On the Last Day, the mountain on which Jehovah's temple stands will stand out above all the mountains. All nations will flock there. " . . . "For a baby boy is born to us. The rule will be given to him; and he shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Almighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace."✉️ 💌
Brother Buddhism and Hinduism are two sides of the same coin. If you have a coin in your pocket, just look at how its two sides are a bit different but exist on the same coin. If your understanding is deep, you will know that there are very minute differences between the two as one evolved out of the other-the same is the case with Jainism and what you call Hinduism. Buddhism, Jainism and Hinduism are parts of a greater fold of DHARMAS and come under the umbrella of Sanaatan Dharma - meaning the eternal and spiritual way of being or living.
Jay bhim namo buddhay ☸👑💫💙💙💙💙🙏🙏🙏🙏☸☸☸👑💫
?? TIME HAS RUN OUT !! John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Don't ignore this message... REPENT NOW !! TRUST that God raised Him from the dead !! By FAITH accept JESUS's blood alone as payment for your sins unto Salvation, to escape what's about to happen !!
💐THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the last age in which God saves man from the destruction of this old world"
(This may be a reminder for most people of God's words from Genesis: "Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness." Suppose God is saying that "let us" make man in "our " picture, then "ours" shows two or more; since He said "ours," then God is not only one. In this way, man begins to think generally of different persons, and from these words came the idea of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. At the time Moses wrote Genesis, it was after the creation of mankind following the creation of the world. In the beginning, when the world, Moses did not exist yet. And it was a long time before Moses wrote the Bible, so how could he possibly know what God said in heaven? He was unaware of how God created the world. What is written in the Old Testament is the work of Jehovah, a phase of the work of God Himself for ushering in the Age of Law. This is the work of God, where as He spoke, it happened, and as He commanded, it remained. When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. When man speaks of separate persons, does it not reflect God? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Doesn't the Spirit of God simply carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives?" Because of this, there is no distinction between persons.)
Almighty God said
This can be a REMINDER for most PEOPLE of GOD'S WORDS from GENESIS: "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." Suppose GOD says "we" will CREATE MAN in "our" IMAGE, then "we" SHOWS TWO or MORE; since He SAID "we," then GOD is NOT one. IN THIS WAY, MAN BEGAN TO THINK GENERALLY OF DIFFERENT PERSONS, AND FROM THESE WORDS HAD THE IDEA OF THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. What then does the Father look like? What does the Son look like? And what does the Holy Spirit look like? ☀️🙏
Could it be that the present man was made in the image of the one who was put together from the three? Then is the image of man like that of the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit? 🙏
WHICH of the persons of GOD is the image of MAN? This idea of MAN is ABSOLUTELY WRONG and NONSENSE! It can only separate one God from several Gods. 🙏
AT THE TIME Moses WROTE GENESIS, it was AFTER MANKIND WAS CREATED AFTER THE CREATION OF THE WORLD. In the BEGINNING, when the WORLD began, Moses did NOT exist. And IT TOOK A LONG TIME FOR MOSES TO WRITE THE BIBLE, so HOW could he possibly KNOW WHAT GOD SAID in HEAVEN?🙏☀️
He is UNCONSCIOUS of HOW GOD CREATED THE WORLD. 🙏
In the OLD TESTAMENT of the Bible, there is NO mention of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, only the TRUE GOD, JEHOVAH, is PERFORMING His WORK in ISRAEL. ☀️
He is CALLED by different NAMES in the CHANGING TIMES, but this DOESN'T PROVE that each NAME REFERES to a different PERSON. Therefore, then wouldn't there be countless persons of God? What is WRITTEN in the OLD TESTAMENT is the WORK of JEHOVAH, A PHASE of the WORK of GOD HIMSELF for the START of the Age of Law. This is GOD'S WORK, where ACCORDING to what He SPOKE, it happened, and ACCORDING to what He commanded, it REMAINS. 🙏💐
AT NO TIME DID JEHOVAH SAY HE WAS THE FATHER WHO WOULD COME TO EFFECT THE WORK, or did He even foretell the coming of the Son to redeem mankind. WHEN IT CAME TO THE TIME OF JESUS, it was only mentioned that GOD became MAN to REDEEM ALL MANKIND, NOT that the SON CAME. ☀️
Because the times are not the same and the work that God Himself carries out is also different, He has to carry out His work within different kingdoms. In this way, the identity He represents is also different. PEOPLE BELIEVE JEHOVAH IS THE FATHER OF JESUS, but JESUS DOESN'T REALLY ACKNOWLEDGE, saying: "We were never identified as Father and Son; I and the Father in heaven are one. The Father is in Me and I am in the Father; when men see the Son, they see the Father in heaven." ☀️😪
When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. By the time man attempts to explain, matters are complicated by the idea of different persons, as well as the relationship between Father, Son, and Spirit. WHEN MAN TALKS ABOUT separate persons, does it not reflect GOD? 🙏🔅
Man even ranks persons as first, second, and third; these are all mere human understandings, unworthy of reference, and utterly unreal! If you ask him: "How many are there in God?" He will say that God is the Trinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit: the one true God. If you ask him: "Who is the Father?" He will say: The Father is the Spirit of God in heaven; He rules over all, and He is the Lord of heaven." "Then is Jehovah the Spirit?" ☀️
He will say: "Yes!" If you ask him afterwards, "Who is the Son?" He will say that Jesus is the Son, anyway: "Then what is the story of Jesus? From whom did He come?" He will say: "Jesus was born of Mary through the shadowing of the Holy Spirit. " ☀️
"Then is not His substance also Spirit? Does His work also represent the Holy Spirit?
Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Now in the last days, it goes without saying that the Spirit still works; how did He become different persons? Doesn't the Spirit of God just carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives? Because of this, there is no difference between personas. 🙏
From "Is There a Trinity?"
Fulfilled in "In the beginning He was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). ... and "When I looked up, someone handed me a book wrapped in a scroll. I opened it and I read on both sides the prayers, lamentations, and curses." (Ezekiel 2:9-10). ... "His garment was stained with blood. He was called the "Word of God" (Rev. 19:13).
The kingdom He brought down and set up in the highest in the sky so that it can occupy His creation in the universe and engrave on it the entirety of His Holy name "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD" 💐 fulfillment of (Mat. 16:18) "And I say as for you, you are Peter, on top of this rock I will build my Church, that even the power of death will not prevail over it.". ... and "The Letter to the Church in Philadelphia" (Rev. 3:7-13). ... And fulfillment of "The New Jerusalem" 💫 "The Spirit enveloped me, and the angel led me to the top of a very high mountain. He showed Me Jerusalem, the Holy City, coming down from heaven from God." (Rev. 3:7-13). ... " For the time has come in the house of God for the beginning of judgment in the house of God." (1 Peter 4:17). ... It is fulfilled that God Himself is our Pastor in (Rev. 7:17) 💐
"For the Lamb in the midst of the throne will be their PASTOR. He will lead them to springs of life-giving water; and God will wipe away the tears from their eyes"
📩 Calling and leading the sheep of God to His glorious Throne "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD"💐 to submit again to His authority so that He will continue to teach, guide and protect even in plague, famine and wild animals will not be moved by it and completely win this final battle with the big red dragon!
"They say with a loud voice, "Salvation comes from the Lamb, and from our God who sits on the Throne!" (Rev. 7:10). ... and it will be fulfilled that will be established above the sky/TH-cam in (Isaiah 2: 2 / 9:6) "On the Last Day, the mountain on which Jehovah's temple stands will stand out above all the mountains. All nations will flock there. " . . . "For a baby boy is born to us. The rule will be given to him; and he shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Almighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace."✉️ 💌
Chill
Relax…..have a sammich