idk, do you consider to get a job in the university as a professor? because this is WAY MORE clearer than what my processor had done, you'd slay as a professor lol. awesome video and thanks SO MUCH for sharing!
I have been stumped by Cardinality Ratios and Participation Constraints for a couple of weeks. This video made everything clear within 15 minutes. I cannot thank you enough!
This video and previous 2 videos forced me to comment that such a great explanation. Now ER-Diagram is completely understood by me. I had gone though many videos for Relational Models but this one cleared all my concepts
about cardinality ration and alternate notation... is the cardinality ratio reversed in the alternate notation? because: "common" notation: EMPLOYEE > N > works for > 1 > DEPARTMENT alternate notation: EMPLOYEE > (1,1) > works for > (1,N) > DEPARTMENT note that the cardinality part (second item between parenthesis) for the alternate notation is inversed when compared to the common notation. is that really correct? if not, which is the correct way to express that "1 employee works for 1 department, but 1 department is worked by N employees"?
Im using your example Cardinality Ratio: Says n employees can work for only ONE department Alternate Notation(min, max): EMPLOYEE(1,1) - A minimum of 1 employee has to participate in the relationship "Works For" and can work for maximum of 1 department. DEPARTMENT(1,N) - A minimum of 1 department can be worked on by a maximum of N employees.
You're the best, Neso Academy !! my exam on the twenty-fifth day of the fifth month of the two-thousand and twenty-second year of our lord will be a breeze thanks to your vast knowledge and your excellent commiunication skills !! :D
Thanks, I have a doubt, relationship is between 2 entities, so from which entity point of view we have to see, I mean whether it is one to many (or) many to one.
idk, do you consider to get a job in the university as a professor? because this is WAY MORE clearer than what my processor had done, you'd slay as a professor lol. awesome video and thanks SO MUCH for sharing!
smooth
well most Indian educators are excellent with their communication skills
I have been stumped by Cardinality Ratios and Participation Constraints for a couple of weeks. This video made everything clear within 15 minutes. I cannot thank you enough!
Thanks for sharing this valuable information through easy way.
Any vitian here ?
Best organized video of database relationship that I have seen so far.
This video and previous 2 videos forced me to comment that such a great explanation. Now ER-Diagram is completely understood by me. I had gone though many videos for Relational Models but this one cleared all my concepts
Sincerely, the lecture is well explained. The lecture addresses my primary needs. Thank you.
❤❤❤
thankkkkkkk you first i was mad confuse about relationships but now i am not thankssss
Thank you mam😇
What is relationship type it is the relationship name for example work_on or the cardinality many_to_many????
Please what is the example of 1:N
Please don't change the accent. Keep it natural.
her accent is good
Yes Hindi English accent rakhe pls British and Hindi accent me na jayee
your channel a place to study. it's has black screen with beautiful lecture
So a Unary relationship is not a relationship since it is only associated with itself?
you saved my exam
Thank you. You have made my life easier.
Thank you very much, ma'am.
Thank you so much for this video, and this series in genreal. Suuuuper useful and really well explained!
thanks to my professor for bringing me here
Just clicking videos desperately trying to learn this as quickly as possible, and as soon as I saw Neso, I knew I was in good hands. Thanks again!
Thank you so much
Well explained. Thank you!
Best organized video in ER diagram
about cardinality ration and alternate notation... is the cardinality ratio reversed in the alternate notation? because:
"common" notation: EMPLOYEE > N > works for > 1 > DEPARTMENT
alternate notation: EMPLOYEE > (1,1) > works for > (1,N) > DEPARTMENT
note that the cardinality part (second item between parenthesis) for the alternate notation is inversed when compared to the common notation.
is that really correct? if not, which is the correct way to express that "1 employee works for 1 department, but 1 department is worked by N employees"?
Im using your example
Cardinality Ratio: Says n employees can work for only ONE department
Alternate Notation(min, max):
EMPLOYEE(1,1) - A minimum of 1 employee has to participate in the relationship "Works For" and can work for maximum of 1 department.
DEPARTMENT(1,N) - A minimum of 1 department can be worked on by a maximum of N employees.
Mam where is the playlist.....? I just have seen one playlist from dbms which does not belong to you. I wonder if you could provide a playlist..
life saver
Thank you for sharing the Concept... It's quite helpful
The thing needed is explain is simple manner rather using define and some bookish sentences. Other terms it is a great channel.👌👍
Thank you so much....nice and very understanding video
Thnx I have test on tomorrow just started watching both the playlist of neso and covered 40% will it be a good exam
This is quite informative! Not all heroes wear capes!
This Video saved me possibly hours of reading, Thank you!
You're the best, Neso Academy !! my exam on the twenty-fifth day of the fifth month of the two-thousand and twenty-second year of our lord will be a breeze thanks to your vast knowledge and your excellent commiunication skills !! :D
Ai generated individual
The best part about this video is, it is created in a speech which is easily understandable! Thanks
Apki avaj bhott pyari h ap face cam on krke pdaya kro ❤️
Very clear, fantastic
🤟
يعطيس الف عافيه
shouldnt it be 2 lines for mandotory participation?
Thank you...😇 ❤
Gud explanation with clear voice...tq mam
explain in *
اريدد بلعربي😭💔
This answers a couple of questions on an exam I just failed where the provided study material did not cover. Thanks.
please continue this playlist
its amazing
Thank you
Thanks.
useful for final preparation
Today is my exam 😂
thank you
Brilliant
noice
hie
do you have a whatsapp group
@
Can we get the slides?
Haye kya aawaz hai
hello muj
gude!gude!
You are smart teacher. Thanks.
VERY HELPFUL !!
Thanks, I have a doubt, relationship is between 2 entities, so from which entity point of view we have to see, I mean whether it is one to many (or) many to one.
it's depends you .You can views it from any side ! that is why we said one to many *OR* many to one .
👌🏽
4.13 is 1:N the same as N:1 because it appears to be the same in reverse ?
no not same
one of the best lecture
Thanks, I have a test the day after tomorrow. I needed this badly!
Hello mam ,pdf will be available
Your slides are dark. If those were light color, it would be good
The ending music is so good.
Dry and boring theory