The Inevitable Decline of WeWork

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ต.ค. 2023
  • Try out Blinkist for 7 days for FREE plus 25% off a premium membership! www.blinkist.com/patrickboyle. Thank you Blinkist for sponsoring today's video!
    WeWork announced this week that it would not make two sets of interest payments totaling about $95 million, a move meant to jump-start negotiations with its lenders at the same time it tries to cut costs with its landlords.
    The missed interest payments will spur speculation of a bankruptcy filing. But WeWork says it has the cash on hand, and the company has a 30-day grace period to make the payments, which were due Monday. At the end of June, it had $205 million in cash and access to a credit line worth $475 million.
    Skipping an interest payment is not necessary to negotiate with lenders. But indebted companies sometimes use the move to put pressure on lenders to restrike deals under more favorable terms.
    From its inception in 2010 to its collapse in 2023, WeWork's journey has been a roller-coaster. Once valued at $47 billion dollars, the company today, is on the verge of bankruptcy. How did the Venture Capital backed co-working company, end up as the biggest financial bonfire in Venture Capital history?
    Patrick's Books:
    Statistics For The Trading Floor: amzn.to/3eerLA0
    Derivatives For The Trading Floor: amzn.to/3cjsyPF
    Corporate Finance: amzn.to/3fn3rvC
    Ways To Support The Channel
    Patreon: / patrickboyleonfinance
    Buy Me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/patrickb...
    Visit our website: www.onfinance.org
    Follow Patrick on Twitter Here: / patrickeboyle
    Patrick Boyle On Finance Podcast:
    Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/7uhrWlD...
    Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
    Google Podcasts: tinyurl.com/62862nve
    Join this channel to support making this content:
    / @pboyle

ความคิดเห็น • 3K

  • @PBoyle
    @PBoyle  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +172

    Try out Blinkist for 7 days for FREE plus 25% off a premium membership! www.blinkist.com/patrickboyle. Thank you Blinkist for sponsoring today's video!

    • @globalismoblackman
      @globalismoblackman 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Masayoshi Son is absolutely fuuuurked losing a huge chunk of his investments in poleaxed We Work led by that crooked plonker ex CEO Adam Neumann. We Work Inc is now gasping for breath on life support machine.

    • @QIKUGAMES-QIKU
      @QIKUGAMES-QIKU 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      You know how I can tell you it's a scam.. Normal idiots like me have never heard of it.. But they advertise its towards idiots like me 😂❤

    • @QIKUGAMES-QIKU
      @QIKUGAMES-QIKU 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      You advertise digital books.. Not good 😐 think about it ❤

    • @dvoiceotruth
      @dvoiceotruth 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I am glad I got to hear about Blinkist today.

    • @mapalochansa9965
      @mapalochansa9965 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Can you talk about the fraud in Singapore

  • @TheGrayAdder
    @TheGrayAdder 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9165

    Adam Neumann is honestly one of my favorite CEOs of all time. Just a golden example of someone who has absolutely no place running a business continuously failing upwards. It’s inspiring in all of the wrong ways.

    • @markomak1
      @markomak1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +516

      I got depressed when I saw his net worth ...

    • @desertdude540
      @desertdude540 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +522

      The wages of sin is death and the wages of zero interest rates is the capitalization of absolutely moronic startups.

    • @CommanderRiker0
      @CommanderRiker0 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +309

      Agree, this is a product of cheap money. Start up, sell out, and dump on the idiots. Standard practice. Look at all the idiots still investing in SPACs.

    • @JonathanBhagan
      @JonathanBhagan 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Agreed

    • @melvingibson4525
      @melvingibson4525 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +130

      These people usually have something in common. They wear the same hat

  • @wkcia
    @wkcia 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3785

    To put this in perspective, there have been NFTs that have kept their value better than WeWork stock.

    • @toifel
      @toifel 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +79

      All my homies hate offices.. homeoffice 4 life

    • @dumbasses_R_us
      @dumbasses_R_us 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I'm on the toilet and just laughed so hard at your comment that my girlfriend banged on the toilet door asking if I was ok. It.took a moment to compose myself and she thought I was either having a heart attack or a huge wank. LoL. Might have a wank now that she's put it in my mind

    • @schwifty3337
      @schwifty3337 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      Yet, wework and nfts are still here, I hate both but they're still in existence

    • @bipolarminddroppings
      @bipolarminddroppings 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      I'd still rather have stock in WeWork than own an NFT.

    • @schwifty3337
      @schwifty3337 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@bipolarminddroppings isn't it better to buy a bit of both?

  • @RipTheJackR
    @RipTheJackR 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +644

    "And his head of IT of his $100 million startup was a 16 year old high school kid nicknamed Joey Cables - who installed routers in the buildings for minimum wage."
    "Couldnt be contacted .. during school hours."

    • @ethannorman7537
      @ethannorman7537 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Holy shit what????

    • @Chadner
      @Chadner หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      No way his real name is Joey Cables 😂😂

    • @FreakyFriday4Phaggs
      @FreakyFriday4Phaggs หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      ​@@Chadnerhis *Nickname*, as in Moniker. Probably cooked up by the "Jenius" Neumann.

    • @OntarioBearHunter
      @OntarioBearHunter หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      He's the Peter Parker of IT.

    • @lisadolan689
      @lisadolan689 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂😂😂

  • @LakanPepe
    @LakanPepe 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1448

    "The clothes were hard to sell, because they were horrible."
    I love finance stand up comedy.

    • @danielponder690
      @danielponder690 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      his sarcastic asides are great throughout this whole video!

    • @hypothalapotamus5293
      @hypothalapotamus5293 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Given what I saw, I am amazed that the clothes existed at all. I was half expecting them to be made of "single layer graphene".

    • @arthurswanson3285
      @arthurswanson3285 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Joey cables lol

    • @Skank_and_Gutterboy
      @Skank_and_Gutterboy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ahahahaha!!!!

    • @Skank_and_Gutterboy
      @Skank_and_Gutterboy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I also like fashion stand up comedy.

  • @colinharter4094
    @colinharter4094 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +889

    Adam Neumann is the kind of impossibly charismatic entrepreneur that every first year business student high on cocaine thinks they are

    • @Willy_Tepes
      @Willy_Tepes 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      Talmudic charisma.

    • @Isthisjoebiden
      @Isthisjoebiden 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@Willy_Tepesalmost choked on my vape😂😂😂

    • @whatevergoesforme5129
      @whatevergoesforme5129 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Wish he were an entrepreneur....but the truth is he is just one of those criminal genius scam artists like Ponzi.

    • @lemeres2478
      @lemeres2478 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Admittedly, that was likely because Neumann was that business student high on cocaine.

    • @Pooty_With_A_Fat_Booty
      @Pooty_With_A_Fat_Booty 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's a helluva drug mayne 😂🤣

  • @jwgmail
    @jwgmail 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1499

    "Coffee lines get long in the morning. People like desks near windows."
    That deadpan delivery just got you a sub. Well researched, well presented.

    • @mrkeogh
      @mrkeogh 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      There's probably a nice little office ergonomics and health app business in there. It's probably worth a few million dollars, too.
      The actual "tech" part of WeWork - if ever implemented correctly - was worth maybe 1/1000th of their peak market value.
      Insane.

    • @jwgmail
      @jwgmail 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@mrkeogh I recently watched "The rise and fall of Under Armour" on youtube and it sounds like their tech play didn't go well, but boy, it sure seems like there was some way they could have monetized all that data... I'm not a big data guy but I feel like I could think of some way, given a few weeks to think about it. Not to recoup all the money they spent but as you said, maybe on the order of several million.

    • @NextianGeometry
      @NextianGeometry 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      Microphones record every word and analyse your tone. Cameras and facial recognition record every move, every person and their mood. And this manages to work out...people like coffee in the morning and natural light. Incredible.

    • @zombietrash416
      @zombietrash416 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      For some reason when I first read "coffee lines get long in the morning," I pictured a bunch of yuppies at their desks with ground up coffee spread out like lines of coke and on Mondays before they start their work week the lines are extra long.

    • @jayceyallen7745
      @jayceyallen7745 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@zombietrash416i did too lol

  • @Zzz-ff1np
    @Zzz-ff1np 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +150

    "They suited New Yorkers who were concerned their apartments were already too spacious" 😂There are so many gems in this

  • @incurableromantic4006
    @incurableromantic4006 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +926

    WeWork is a classic example of a company that thrives in late-stage booms: when there's frenzied speculation and people throwing money at anyone who can tell a good tale.

    • @incurableromantic4006
      @incurableromantic4006 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

      @@zogwort1522 And the founder had long hair, an exotic accent and didn't wear a suit - he *must* have been a genius!

    • @johnaustin209
      @johnaustin209 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@zogwort1522 Trailblazer my a**. Dirty little hippiesque fraudster.

    • @gregisbased5205
      @gregisbased5205 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      bro said late-stage

    • @jthom0027
      @jthom0027 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@incurableromantic4006 And don't underestimate the power of that CEO having a wife that is related to a celebrity as well. A celebrity that just so happens to be so cool that she sells a candle that smells like her vagina. These are big brain people we are talking about here.

    • @aandwdabest
      @aandwdabest 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      While people who does actual work (manufacturing, agriculture, etc.) are being further wage depressed, coupled with the fact that these days a lot of people and their mother wants to be Uber famous on the internet. This civilization has become a sick joke.

  • @GeliCarlosJ
    @GeliCarlosJ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2754

    Whenever you doubt yourself just remember Adam & Rebecca Neumann were able to convince a lot of supposedly intelligent people to allow them to run this company and give them hundreds of millions of dollars. If they can do that, you can do whatever challenge is in front of you.

    • @233kosta
      @233kosta 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +133

      Reckon his investors will fund the early days of my international infrastructure brokerage? We're happy to offer investors special prices on bridges.

    • @lindaholtzman5374
      @lindaholtzman5374 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +188

      All you need to meet any challenge is a complete lack of ethics and the ability to lie shamelessly!

    • @pfeilspitze
      @pfeilspitze 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +94

      More like get depressed that competence is this undervalued, and that you're always going to be screwed over by someone who can BS better.

    • @233kosta
      @233kosta 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      @@lindaholtzman5374 Is it "lying" when it's done to gullible venture capitalists? 🤣

    • @bipolarminddroppings
      @bipolarminddroppings 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

      @@233kosta I know this is going to be a much too nuanced answer, but: Yes.

  • @spiritualanarchist8162
    @spiritualanarchist8162 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2679

    The moral of the story. Today's society isn't based on education, plans or hard work. It's about knowing the right people people with too much money.

    • @roc7880
      @roc7880 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +97

      sadly yes. also people making emotional decisions and hiring people they like not people they need

    • @spiritualanarchist8162
      @spiritualanarchist8162 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@roc7880 And people they know who will do the same for them ! Over the years I noticed how ' higher management ' always gets hired from outside instead of promoting someone from the existing middle management .
      They come into a business they know nothing about and receive huge salaries. When the company goes bankrupt, they already have another job waiting for them. It's a group of people with mediocre skills that went to the same schools, married eachother,, etc , etc . They keep giving eachother , their friends , their friends kids, jobs as a 'favor '

    • @callusklaus2413
      @callusklaus2413 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +126

      This implies that the problem is a novel moral issue.
      Knowing the right people with money has been part of the problem for ages.
      What you are describing is capitalism, nothing more or less.

    • @joet4811
      @joet4811 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      And flashiness. Lots of it.

    • @themuffinmage3565
      @themuffinmage3565 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +127

      ​@callusklaus2413 I'm pretty sure that's all of human history not just capitalism, most old empires was in charge by those who had wealth, land and military power

  • @GyroCannon
    @GyroCannon 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +444

    Masayoshi Son is my favorite example of how people with money often don't get it through hard work or talent.
    You just need dumb luck once and you can be rich as hell.

    • @MangaGamify
      @MangaGamify 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      aka: being born to rich &/or influential family

    • @stillakzo
      @stillakzo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      That's not his money. Vision fund is apple, Saudi money

    • @politicaltroll8920
      @politicaltroll8920 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well the richest man in the world is Elon Musk. If you need proof we don't live in a meritocracy there it is.

    • @christinebeames712
      @christinebeames712 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Preparation makes taking advantage of “ good luck” or an opportunity ,easier for hard workers , than s9me body who waits for it to be handed on a plate ,

    • @jakepietrzak7552
      @jakepietrzak7552 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      well said, my old man invested about 20,000 into apple stock in 97, and another 10k in 99. Made tens of millions off a lucky gamble.

  • @ocping
    @ocping 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +680

    At one of my previous employers, I had the "privilege" of working in a Wework office. The really astonishing thing is how extremely overpriced the rent was (50x the rent per square foot of our most central business areas). It blows my mind thinking people still pay to work in what's essentially an overpriced nice-looking office.

    • @GerhardMack
      @GerhardMack 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +85

      Having also worked in a WeWork office, I also realized they were overpriced by the square foot, but the advantage was that you could rent far fewer square feet and save money overall. I also referred to them as the Apple of the office market. Where I worked, they were about 90% occupancy. The two downsides: 1: The toilets almost always had a lineup. 2: The free beer was a bad idea from some people. I had a co worker actually fill up a water bottle with beer and manage to be mildly drunk all morning.
      The trouble was always that the company was designed to bleed it's income and was structured to fail. If WeWork had not rented through intermediaries, held off their Charitable activities, and waited to be profitable before wasting money on perks like corporate jets, the whole thing could have been very profitable.

    • @RasheedahsWifeSchool
      @RasheedahsWifeSchool 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​@GerhardMack would you mind to say what you paid and what Sq footage you had? This is really interesting. I never looked into a WeWork place specifically, but I did need office space when they were in their prime. I looked into a traditional office in a financial district that was $1100 a month. It had a coffee area but definitely no alcohol and no attempt at creating a happy hour culture. Then I looked at a coworking hipster place that wanted $1700 for less space. I also got the sense that few space renters there were bringing clients to the office, although there were meeting spaces. I sensed that the meeting spaces were meant for the workers and not so targeted toward client meetings. Is that right? I am sure most of these places followed a blueprint.

    • @GerhardMack
      @GerhardMack 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      Well where I am, you could get WeWork spaces for a few hundred if you only needed 2 or 3 desks. This seems to be the sweet spot since no one will rent out an office that small here. Certainly if you have enough people to fit the smallest rental spaces something like WeWork isn't competitive.
      The meeting rooms had to be reserved so they could be for either meetings or clients.

    • @gawainethefirst
      @gawainethefirst 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      “There’s a sucker born every minute.”
      -PT Barnum.

    • @pedrojustice
      @pedrojustice 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Dude
      It couldnt be profitable. Have you not watched the video?
      Its not innovative. Its high risk, Very low margin. You lose big the moment someone cancels with you
      Theres no If they made mess extravaganza they could exist.
      It was a matter of when the vc funds would dry. Sooner than later

  • @TheZackofSpades
    @TheZackofSpades 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1556

    I’ve yucked my way through a few compilations of the WeWork collapse but the fact that well over 90% of the decision makers here continue to enjoy a life far more leisurely and luxurious than anything I can imagine…it stings a bit. Definitely stings. Accountability is just not a thing for the ruling class.

    • @michimatsch5862
      @michimatsch5862 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +153

      If you are rich enough you live consequence free. Other people have to bear your consequences instead.

    • @TheZackofSpades
      @TheZackofSpades 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@michimatsch5862 find me a rich person that complains and I will show you a liar. They don’t work, they just waste other people’s time.

    • @marlonyo
      @marlonyo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@michimatsch5862 but the other people bearing the consequences for this are venture capitalist who dont care because they investing knowing this had a 1% chance of succeeding they invest in a hundredth company and if the hope that one will make more than 100X their investment so when it fails they dont care that much. the other people affected are the rich land owners that got not paid rent.

    • @anna_in_aotearoa3166
      @anna_in_aotearoa3166 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      Externalising one's costs definitely seems to be the highway to wealth, for a business OR an individual! (Or a whole high-tech consumerist society.) Whether it's ethical or constructive, on the other hand...?🤦🏻‍♀️

    • @Rustsamurai1
      @Rustsamurai1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      Rug Pulls R US

  • @travisadams4470
    @travisadams4470 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +286

    The first "Physical Social Network" was/is gossiping grandmothers.

    • @oz_jones
      @oz_jones 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Or a bar

    • @StephenGillie
      @StephenGillie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Pub vs Knitting Circle - which came first?

    • @dri1811ya
      @dri1811ya 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Pretty sure it's my grandma's weekly game of mahjong

    • @ChristopherSadlowski
      @ChristopherSadlowski 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      The entire arc of human history, the whole thing, had been a "physical social network" right up until the Internet came out. The absolute hubris of this statement is astounding, in a bad way. That not a single person with a gazillion dollars had this thought before tossing all that money in the trash is also astounding in the most HORRIFIC way.

    • @travisadams4470
      @travisadams4470 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ChristopherSadlowski Easy Karen... don't get your panties in a wad

  • @SuprousOxide
    @SuprousOxide 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +191

    Disgusting that a CEO that appeared to be defrauding the company by leasing from his own properties still got a layoff package...

    • @pkhaloobonaccio9883
      @pkhaloobonaccio9883 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i believe Neumann should be hit with both fraud and insider trading investigations

    • @Sick_Pencil
      @Sick_Pencil 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      and no court

  • @Likeomgitznich
    @Likeomgitznich 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +183

    I interned at a startup that worked out of a WeWork in NYC on Wall Street from 2015 to 2016. I always thought something was pretty fishy because that whole time the offices were basically empty. If at 21 I saw how sus this was, then investors have 0 excuse beyond pure stupidity.

    • @mipmipmipmipmip
      @mipmipmipmipmip 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Federal reserve setting their interest rates to 0 means investing turns into straight out betting

    • @silentdrew7636
      @silentdrew7636 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They weren't looking.

    • @M.-fy8gj
      @M.-fy8gj หลายเดือนก่อน

      same thing happened with the wework building in seattle!! wework never finished it and another company ended up buying it. most of it is STILL unfinished. it was just way too big and the location is awful

  • @NaZtRdAmUs
    @NaZtRdAmUs 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1437

    Still blows my mind how people actually believed We Work was a "tech" company.

    • @kris1123259
      @kris1123259 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

      technically, buildings and offices are technologies, so ofc they were a tech company.

    • @StephenGillie
      @StephenGillie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kris1123259Nooooo...buildings are art, as any architect will remind you. Physics and mathematics of the building's construction are usually an afterthought. I hang out in an architecture Discord and some of the things the pros say scare me.

    • @dvoiceotruth
      @dvoiceotruth 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

      I think it worked because tech people don't have any idea outside of tech and of course Joey Cables.

    • @epbrown01
      @epbrown01 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +89

      People still insist Tesla isn't a car company.

    • @StephenGillie
      @StephenGillie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dvoiceotruth Tech has a stupid amount of money sloshing around, from people who were with MS in the 90s and became millionaires from selling their stock. Or otherwise invested during the Dotcom and later tech bubbles. These might be software development geniuses, but business novices, and believe what everyone tells them. And when they get ripped off most are too embarrassed and disappear.

  • @brandonwiese4615
    @brandonwiese4615 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1183

    ".. as a worst case scenario, it can only fall an additional 100%." I simply couldn't stop laughing. I love his dry humor.

    • @mysteryman480
      @mysteryman480 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      I have made this "fill in the missing word" task for my math class: ""WeWork went public just under two years ago through a SPAC merger and since then the stock has fallen by 99 percent, which means that at this point (as a worst-case scenario) it can only fall an additional one percent.""

    • @Jensth
      @Jensth 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@mysteryman480haha.... good one!

    • @plumbthumbs9584
      @plumbthumbs9584 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      that was gold and let's you know you listening to a shrewd documentary.

    • @julianbrelsford
      @julianbrelsford 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@mysteryman480some parameters not defined.
      If I "can still lose 100%" then we must be talking about "relative to today's value"
      .....
      If I "lost 99% of my investment" and "can still lose 1%" ... then we must be talking about its value relative to some unspecified moment before the present.

    • @haleymist09
      @haleymist09 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      The sarcasm was so dry on "for NYers who worried their apt was too roomy" I had to drink some water 😆

  • @tribalbeat6471
    @tribalbeat6471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +137

    "The clothes were difficult to sell because they were horrible," had me burst out laughing.

  • @secretstosuccessinthepearl6340
    @secretstosuccessinthepearl6340 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    I was looking for office space in Hong Kong and was being shown around wework building by the wework team. I said to the sales professional “how are you a tech company when it’s office space?” She replied “we have an app where you can book meeting rooms” 😂😂😂

    • @tinyleopard6741
      @tinyleopard6741 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's hilarious but surprisingly honest haha

    • @liordagan9342
      @liordagan9342 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Regus has it too.

    • @abellargo7668
      @abellargo7668 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂priceless

  • @BatkoNashBandera774
    @BatkoNashBandera774 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +411

    The bit about New Yorkers complaining that their apartments were too spacious was pure comedic gold and financial satire -> Thank you Patrick!

  • @profdc9501
    @profdc9501 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +170

    One could be forgiven for watching this video and coming to the conclusion that working for a living and trying to do something useful and valuable with one's efforts is for suckers.

    • @MikeRyzhikov
      @MikeRyzhikov 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      You gotta work honestly, focusing on hard work and dedication, and lie, cheat, and steal on the side to rise to the top. Heh

    • @Umur64
      @Umur64 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      it is

    • @juchou2983
      @juchou2983 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely..

    • @SoulDevoured
      @SoulDevoured 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@MikeRyzhikovyes Mr Newman worked very hard to sell the idea that his idea was so bullet proof he could be a complete the worst vision of a California frat boy without fear of consequences.
      And it was a sound idea. For himself.

    • @theautisticguitarist7560
      @theautisticguitarist7560 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Just throwing it out there: if working 9-5 would make you rich, the ruling class would all be working.

  • @vizzini2510
    @vizzini2510 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +84

    This concept has been around for decades, going by the name of "executive suites." Numerous office buildings around the country rented out large blocks of office space in the traditional way, but then they would also have a few thousand SF carved up into numerous offices to rent to small companies who needed just one or two rooms. The executive suite tenants would typically share a bathroom, break room, conference room, copy machine, and sometimes a receptionist. So this genius decides to call this WeWork space, and he makes billions. Wish I had thought of that!

    • @duncanhamilton5841
      @duncanhamilton5841 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      It is classic Silicon Valley reinventing the broom. The irony is that they could have made it Uber/AirBnB For Offices centralising all those existing small suite offerings on one platform, taking a commission from that. If done properly could have been a nice little income for fairly low investment.

    • @gravityissues5210
      @gravityissues5210 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      I was using Regus “pay by the hour” offices and conference rooms in the 2000s. And they were just the best known; there were local one-offs and other national chains. I cannot fathom the sheer stupidity of people who believe WeWork “fundamentally changed how people use commercial real estate.”

    • @joostdriesens3984
      @joostdriesens3984 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@gravityissues5210 but WeWork is a community that raises the global conscience! I bet Regus can't do that! 😄

    • @ComradeOgilvy1984
      @ComradeOgilvy1984 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@duncanhamilton5841 If done properly, yes. This is a line of business that could organically grow into something.
      To achieve the desired level of hype, WeWork spent big to achieve rapid growth. So they locked in a lot of long term leases when office space prices were at their highs. Now there is empty office space everywhere. A very small company with cash flow issues might be willing to pay a premium for office space with WeWork, to be able to not lock in more than they need. But real businesses can now get a long term lease at an attractive price.

    • @gravityissues5210
      @gravityissues5210 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@joostdriesens3984 Yeah, true, and Regus didn't have free beer either, so, I guess they have a point, lol.

  • @wohlhabendermanager
    @wohlhabendermanager 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Seems like the crazy runs wild in the whole Paltrow family.
    "According to Vanity Fair at WeWork "[Rebekah Neumann] has been known to have people fired, such as a mechanic for WeWork’s Gulfstream jet, within minutes of meeting them because she didn’t like their energy.""
    Does she also sell jade eggs?

  • @evanburrows1697
    @evanburrows1697 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +394

    _"His wife Rebekah Paltrow insisted on choosing the paper for the IPO filing."_
    I can't help but reminded of the business card scene in American Psycho. 🤣

    • @oz_jones
      @oz_jones 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

      But did she get a table in Dorsia?

    • @dogwklr
      @dogwklr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      ​@@oz_jonesno, she was returning video tapes.

    • @dogwklr
      @dogwklr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      "Pat neuman" tasteful eggshell with Romalian type.

    • @user-xf6ef8ec4z
      @user-xf6ef8ec4z 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Very nice

    • @rvkice23
      @rvkice23 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Very nice. Let's see Paul Allen's IPO filing

  • @doresearchstopwhining
    @doresearchstopwhining 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +414

    How the VCs and portfolio managers who invested in wework still have their jobs and self respect is astounding.

    • @profdc9501
      @profdc9501 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

      I am guessing that an inflated ego and losing other people's money helps one rest easier at night.

    • @alexanderSydneyOz
      @alexanderSydneyOz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Um, it's their money.

    • @doresearchstopwhining
      @doresearchstopwhining 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

      @@alexanderSydneyOz Um, most of them it wasn't. VCs and asset managers typically are investing other people's money with just a little skin in the game.

    • @purpurina5663
      @purpurina5663 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Otherwise JPMorgan wouldn't exist at all

    • @me-myself-i787
      @me-myself-i787 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Perhaps the other companies they invested in were so successful that it more than compensated for their WeWork losses.

  • @AlexFariaOliveira
    @AlexFariaOliveira 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    19:00 I absolutely love the whole "I trust my feelings", "The spakle on his eyes" and so on... is like these people never bothered to watch a documentary of a serial killer!

  • @TheClintonio
    @TheClintonio 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    As someone who worked in startups in that period I do remember knowing a) it was bullshit, b) loving the amount of money I was making off of it, c) wondering when it would end, and d) wondering if I should get in on the grift. I never did because I just don't have the charm of these people nor the propensity to grift. Still, good times, lots of champagne, trips to exotic places, insane ideas, impossible projects and zero fucks given by me. Shame I'm no longer in my 20s because I doubt I'd be able to keep up if it all started up again.

    • @TheClintonio
      @TheClintonio 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Oh and I loved WeWork offices.

    • @Sick_Pencil
      @Sick_Pencil 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good for you. Sadly, I was the working slave in two of these startups with none of the benefits.

  • @DM-yj9qf
    @DM-yj9qf 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +294

    the biggest con is rich people convincing everyone (including themselves) that they're smarter than everyone else

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      You only notice the rich people that think that. Statistically, two thirds of people think they are smarter than average.

    • @ClxTablet-pv5hi
      @ClxTablet-pv5hi 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Gov needs to change it's laws to stop abuse people need to pay taxes

    • @BUSeixas11
      @BUSeixas11 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tons of research shows that IQ predicts income and job performance.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BUSeixas11 bullshit. The researchers think they're smarter and have brighter futures than they really do

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ClxTablet-pv5hi namely you

  • @facubeitches1144
    @facubeitches1144 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +294

    Losing millions means that you're an incompetent buffoon; losing billions means that you're a visionary!

    • @rdallas81
      @rdallas81 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      The collapse of 1 is a tragedy-
      The collapse of billions is a statistic.
      Sir Bankman Stalin.

    • @snooganslestat2030
      @snooganslestat2030 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      When you owe the bank million you're in trouble. When you owe the bank 1billion theyre in trouble.

    • @MikeRyzhikov
      @MikeRyzhikov 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Love the above two comments.

    • @Darrylizer1
      @Darrylizer1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      So long as you yourself lose nothing and walk away with over a billion like Adam Neumann did.

    • @lauradana22
      @lauradana22 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The worst thing about this is that all this money could have been used to fund business that actually produced value not another ponzi scheme which seems to be the core of our economy and our version of capitalism.

  • @mascan7905
    @mascan7905 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    I'm honestly amazed they've lasted this long. A shared office space that hit big just before Covid? Remote working should've made them completely irrelevant.

  • @Enonymouse_
    @Enonymouse_ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

    The real estate market in areas like Seattle, NY and Portland for example are areas I believe represent a ticking time bomb for investors. The valuation of land in NY nearly tanked during Covid despite landlords hiking rents to crazy levels and drastically lower numbers of prospective renters, the cost of living in areas like i've mentioned are higher than the income levels of the people looking to rent or buy.

  • @danteodor00
    @danteodor00 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +133

    Don't forget to mention the million dollar check and free advertising from his father in law to launch WeWork. Without that man and his network, WeWork would never exist.

  • @ewanduffy
    @ewanduffy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +469

    Once Cramer backed it, that should have been the red flag against investing.

    • @dvoiceotruth
      @dvoiceotruth 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      😂

    • @tryingtomakeplaylist
      @tryingtomakeplaylist 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

      Inverse cramer to the moon

    • @tfive24
      @tfive24 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      My question, why does he have an investor club for $400 a year?

    • @maxafc4695
      @maxafc4695 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      ​@@tfive24so that people can inverse cramer

    • @sid2112
      @sid2112 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      I saw a video once where a guy invested exactly as Cramer said and lost most of the capital he set aside.

  • @BrianHoff04
    @BrianHoff04 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    It shows how stupid investors can be, how fare a bad idea can get, how gullible the media is that can't stop promoting it, and how little oversight there is to prevent this from happening.
    What a truly insane system we've created.
    We deserve this.

    • @Sick_Pencil
      @Sick_Pencil 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      WeDeserve

  • @asimplecabbage6694
    @asimplecabbage6694 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I seriously love seeing captions that aren't auto-generated and I can actually understand what's going on.❤

  • @nickl5658
    @nickl5658 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1011

    Adam Neumann is likely one of the great heroes of capitalism and modern society. He is possibility the greatest salesmen to have ever lived. He sold rubbish using a known bad business model for tens of billions to people who could easily have known better. He demonstrates why many modern companies lavish wealth on the sales department and have bare bones for the technical department. You can sell a bad product with a good sales team but you can't sell a good product with a bad sales team.

    • @BassForever44
      @BassForever44 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

      Bill Hicks said it better: "people working in marketing are satan's little helpers" 😂 and you are right, no matter the quality of a product, if you have bad sales people you will be toasted

    • @kicapanmanis1060
      @kicapanmanis1060 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

      Apple's probably the best example of this. Mostly just marketing fluff and branding.

    • @azahel542
      @azahel542 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      And the best part is that he did it while being basically a hippie selling spirit charged shungite.

    • @jacob9673
      @jacob9673 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kicapanmanis1060You saying that shows how little you know, buying into brand hatred. You’re the perfect consumer Lmao.
      Apple has some strengths (their supply chain, chipset, and software-as well as their diversification and ecosystem) but also have plenty of limitations. I’m in a computational science field, and most people actually prefer development on macs for a lot of the mentioned reasons. These aren’t stupid people-most of us are either doing our PhD at a “top tier” (HYPSM) school, or have one. Of course we have to do high performance jobs on the school or US government’s HPC clusters - but your shitty $3,000 razer gaming laptop or my custom setup isn’t doing that anyways.
      Of course, there are plenty of restrictions too-that’s why I have my own PC that I built.
      However, “apple is only marketing” is a braindead take. That’s as idiotic as saying “Elon musk is a great engineer and not at all a salesperson.”

    • @TAS_CNX
      @TAS_CNX 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@kicapanmanis1060yes Apple have made zero innovations in their history 😂😂😂

  • @bilbobeutlin3405
    @bilbobeutlin3405 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1017

    Neumann learned the art of miliking VCs for their money. You have to somehow respect that.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +104

      It's a legal con

    • @roc7880
      @roc7880 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      I do to be honest. I have ideas better than Wework and why not pitch them to a VC?

    • @epicchk4319
      @epicchk4319 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      Yeah but in the other hand it's Softbank
      You just need to be charismatic, wear a Turtleneck and say you want to be the next Steve Jobs and they will give you one Billion dollars

    • @a_sweetroll1627
      @a_sweetroll1627 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@roc7880 one has to have money first and good looking, also helps if one comes from a well known family

    • @octagonPerfectionist
      @octagonPerfectionist 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@roc7880you need to come from extreme wealth in the first place for them to listen to you

  • @Orbilfolda
    @Orbilfolda 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Maybe one thing to remember when (rightfully so) being perplexed about Adam's behaviour and success: that entire system of VC funding that created him (and SBF, Elizabeth, etc). That system encourages exactly this kind of behaviour and punishes founders who care. Your investors will tell you to fake it for your customers and they will try to teach you how to fool the follow up investors into putting in even more. No one seems to care what really you build and whether it can work.

  • @andrewmcalister3462
    @andrewmcalister3462 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    The story of WeWork’s craziness is just so extreme that I can’t distinguish between a factual recounting of what went on there on a daily basis, and Patrick’s deadpan one liners.

  • @adamarket
    @adamarket 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +120

    I was working at a WeWork the day the news came out that it was essentially done. The annoyingly upbeat WeWork staff looked like they were about ready to jump out the window (and we were on the 20th floor). I may not sound sympathetic but it's only because I had my turn in the tech company barrel having worked 8 years building a company only to get shafted and pushed out the door. It's the cycle of from Start Up to Fucked Up. I honestly still like the idea of shared workspaces although I'd rather work remotely.

    • @ChristopherSadlowski
      @ChristopherSadlowski 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, the real kicker is there IS a way to have communal working conditions if you yeet capital interests and pressure out the window. It's kinda sad how small the American imagination has become. End stage capitalism is going to drag us all down with it and drown us beneath the waves; no one seems to have the gumption to speak out in a way that matters. My poor disabled ass can't start the revolution, that's for damn sure.

  • @SloppyJoe413
    @SloppyJoe413 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +283

    "Adam smoked so much weed on a private flight to Israel the crew had to wear oxygen masks and refused to fly him back" I died.

    • @StephenGillie
      @StephenGillie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@JamesDeWalt909 That's all it takes? Wow, takes more to hotbox a small car. Is this because the cabin air system recirculates the terpene-enhanced air?

    • @rdallas81
      @rdallas81 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@JamesDeWalt909gotta roll the windows up.
      Rastafari mon.

    • @StephenGillie
      @StephenGillie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@JamesDeWalt909 You're going to tell me that a car is hotboxed after just 1? You'd still be able to walk...

    • @OLDMANTEA
      @OLDMANTEA 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Capt: how high do you want to fly?
      Adam: yes!

    • @MikeRyzhikov
      @MikeRyzhikov 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@StephenGillie Higher altitude and maybe decreased cabin pressure compared to sea level would allow gases, vapors, and smoke to expand rapidly.

  • @lisadolan689
    @lisadolan689 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    ‘The clothes didn’t sell because they were horrible’
    Pmsl 🙌🤣🤣🤣
    Go Patrick! 🤣🤣🤣
    I’m so Fecken glad that I’ve found this informative and hilarious channel!!
    BRILLIANT 😂

  • @TomosGlyndwr
    @TomosGlyndwr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Cramer's endorsement should have been enough to send any sensible investor running. The Inverse Cramer strategy reigns supreme!

  • @Wltrwllyngaeiou
    @Wltrwllyngaeiou 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +276

    The most amazing thing about this story is that there was no fraud. Just plain stupidity

    • @kaasmeester5903
      @kaasmeester5903 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      No stupidity, I bet the guy knew what he was doing. Which is: he siphoned off a buttload of money by overcharging WeWork for the real estate, which was owned by his own company. The guy is loaded no matter what WeWork's fate is. But yeah, no fraud as far as I can tell; this is not illegal.

    • @okgroomer1966
      @okgroomer1966 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      The guy who got rich wasn't stupid that's for sure. I'm kinda jealous actually

    • @parthsavyasachi9348
      @parthsavyasachi9348 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Stupidity of vcs yes.

    • @alexanderSydneyOz
      @alexanderSydneyOz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      I think the OP was referring to investor stupidity, and there was plainly no fraud. Hype, yes, but no deception.

    • @drekmastermind
      @drekmastermind 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      There was a lot of illegal stuff going on, some of it fraud. A CEO selling to his own company is in conflict of interest and has liability.
      They didn't press charges because they tried to salvage the business and save face.
      VC business model hangs on the fact that people think they are "smart money", they don't want to go and say that "The golden boy CEO we hyped is not only a bad CEO, he was stealing to our faces and pissing on our heads".
      Remember that VCs have investors of their own, its not their money they lose.

  • @facubeitches1144
    @facubeitches1144 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +739

    It never fails to make me laugh to see how effective: "This time, it will be different!" works as a marketing slogan. From bad real estate leases to totalitarian governments, people are always willing to believe that it really will work out that way.

    • @JulietSierraUK
      @JulietSierraUK 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Counterpoint: all of human progress.

    • @facubeitches1144
      @facubeitches1144 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JulietSierraUK People still make the same mistakes over and over - they think they've got the world figured, they've got the problems solved, and this time it will be different, because we've got this new technology, or now we've got the right people in charge, or we're going to eliminate the right people this time...

    • @kicapanmanis1060
      @kicapanmanis1060 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      Reminds me a lot of Democrats in the US

    • @StephenGillie
      @StephenGillie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Yeah, but this time it will be different.

    • @guydreamr
      @guydreamr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      One more lane will fix it.

  • @Mrkevi123
    @Mrkevi123 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I walked near a Wework building yesterday. And this is in my feed. Thanks, Google maps!

  • @roccovergoglini7670
    @roccovergoglini7670 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I'm just a guy who works in healthcare and knows nothing about finance. But I subscribe to this channel because Patrick is so damn good at making finance both interesting and entertaining. Thank you Mr. Boyle!

  • @naaags
    @naaags 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +167

    Patrick is easily one of my favorite youtube comedians, the stellar financial reporting is a nice plus

  • @vikramkrishnan6414
    @vikramkrishnan6414 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +308

    As a person who has worked in Tech for well over a decade plus, permit me to state a rather obvious fact: the mere existence of computers on your premises or adjacency to tech companies doesn't make you a tech company and shouldn't be valued as such.

    • @ribbonsofnight
      @ribbonsofnight 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      Thanks, I was in a high school recently and was wondering if it should promote itself as a tech company to venture capital firms.

    • @SupramanRambled
      @SupramanRambled 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      I would argue that even tech companies shouldn't be valued as such. The kind of valuations they get for essentially more of the same is crazy.

    • @globalismoblackman
      @globalismoblackman 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SupramanRambled Bro those valuations are insane even for a "Bean Counter" finance professional like myself 🤣.

    • @Jensth
      @Jensth 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Tech stands for technology. Why do anyone think its specifically about computers? Anyway.... no matter the discourse, "Tech" as a business concept is so broad as to be basically meaningless.

    • @StephenGillie
      @StephenGillie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Managed a modest cloud environment for a company, as they moved off of their mainframe and into a data lake, then built out a web store front end with credit card processing. Even a package tracking feature. They're not a tech company at all, but one of the country's largest chemical sales and logistics companies. They make money selling hundreds of tons of caustic soda (lye, sodium hydroxide) to makeup and soap companies.

  • @dahliacheung6020
    @dahliacheung6020 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    1. Neumann is very talented at coming up with businesses that are obviously ridiculous and idiotic to 99/100 people but appear absolutely brilliant to one fool who happens to have lots of money to burn.
    2. This video could have been titled, "idiots with too much money and all the ways in which they wasted it on terrible ideas."
    3. You have the driest humor I've ever come across and it works so well here. You don't even skip a beat and I love it so.

  • @ZombieMurdoc
    @ZombieMurdoc 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    "That wouldn't be nice, and I pretend to be nice on this channel" is the most relatable thing I've heard this decade.

  • @irekaias
    @irekaias 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +65

    Who thought that giving free beer to Gen-X and Millennials depressed about their office careers was a good business venture?

    • @StephenGillie
      @StephenGillie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I didn't know they had free beer. The JS meetups I went to at a WeWork were all dry.

    • @hypothalapotamus5293
      @hypothalapotamus5293 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yeah. They should've provided cocaine.

  • @jkfecke
    @jkfecke 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    Jim Cramer was bullish on the IPO, and that was all you needed to know.

    • @francisnopantses1108
      @francisnopantses1108 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Like clockwork.

    • @tactileslut
      @tactileslut 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      $SJIM for the win, or at least for a cheap chuckle.

    • @JimGeers-do1if
      @JimGeers-do1if 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Short any Cramer pick.

  • @Keenath
    @Keenath 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    That SEC filing is killing me. Like do you people understand that you're filing an official statement to the united states government, not pitching investors..?

  • @planescaped
    @planescaped 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    "If you boldly declare your company with worth a certain price, then you just need one person with money to agree and it takes on that value"
    Just like with selling high art, another shady industry.

  • @hrishikesh-s
    @hrishikesh-s 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +465

    Adam Neumann is one of the best CEOs of the 2010s.
    He successfully was able to short a private market.

    • @nitehawk86
      @nitehawk86 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      I assume that at the time there was still a belief of "if SoftBank invests in it, it must be good." I would like to think nobody would be fooled that easily now.

    • @Programarchive
      @Programarchive 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      Talk fast, drink fast, fire extinguisher full blast

    • @jal051
      @jal051 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@nitehawk86 Stares at 'flow'

    • @bilsid
      @bilsid 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂

    • @cyberft
      @cyberft 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He also made his early investors tons of money.

  • @DarkBloodbane
    @DarkBloodbane 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +97

    Everytime I heard Adam Neumann, I remember Elizabeth Holmes and SBF. They did the same things: made a company, got money from investors, spend some of the money for their luxury lives and had their company in dubious performance. The latter are in trouble with law while Adam isn't.
    My biggest concern are the investors, why they were so easy to give money to these people.

    • @StephenGillie
      @StephenGillie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      AOC is better at LOL than SBF. She was ranked and didn't play during work, while he was not ranked despite (or maybe because of) playing during investor calls. (Don't get sniped by a jungler when you're alt-tabbed looking for last year's ebitda.)

    • @tomwright9904
      @tomwright9904 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Hmm... I wonder what share of the investment was spent by the ceo. I imagine a lot of the investment was in real estate itself and the losses arise from interest rates and wfh.

    • @robertbeisert3315
      @robertbeisert3315 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Noticing is forbidden

    • @SoulDevoured
      @SoulDevoured 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      I was thinking about this. And while I'm sure there's a ton of technicalities I don't understand as far as I can see on the surface is that Holmes was selling a physical product she knew didn't work while Newman was selling an idea he knew didn't work.
      It's alot easier to prove the former than the latter.

    • @PaulSpades
      @PaulSpades 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@SoulDevoured The fact that he got booted out with money in his pocket (while the investors still had hope for the company) basically absolved him and his misses for all of the shady accounting and lies. I understand the process of it, but I also don't understand why and how this is fair.

  • @user-dw1ls3rp1l
    @user-dw1ls3rp1l 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    They weren't even glorified landlords, because at least a landlord owns the real estate. Zero hard assets, and a ton of short and long term liability in the form of payments on ten-year leases. Add the that the potential quagmire of employees of competing businesses working in close quarters with sensitive and proprietary info...There is a reason companies have their OWN offices.

  • @gqueirogabr
    @gqueirogabr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

    I was thinking the same thing. I'm an honest person whose always followed the rules and tried to do things "by the book". Hearing about how someone can rizz their way to the top providing zero value other than moral net worth is astonishing. I'm currently living paycheck to paycheck and have become more interested in how to replicate this behavior than admonish it. Dude tricked everyone and still came out a billionaire. It's people like Adam, SBF, and Elizabeth Holmes that make me question morality.

    • @douglassun8456
      @douglassun8456 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Well, presumably you have managed to avoid jail time and the disadvantages of being a convicted felon. That's more than you can say for Elizabeth Holmes and, soon, Sam Bankman-Freid.

    • @Darrylizer1
      @Darrylizer1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@douglassun8456 You said exactly what I was thinking. Holmes is now broke and locked up and SBF will follow suit. They were fraudsters, however WeWork wasn't a fraud, it was nothing.

    • @douglassun8456
      @douglassun8456 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@PaulSpades Bernie Madoff died in jail. Elizabeth Holmes is in jail right now. Bankman-Fried may or may not get the full 115 years that he's facing, but people following the trial have almost all said that it's not going well for him and the judge is irritated by his defense team. None of them bought their way out of trouble. But you rather stupidly missed my point: I was responding to someone who wondered whether it was better to be a white-collar criminal or live an honest life and stay out of trouble. I pointed out something that seems obvious to me, that even a little trouble with the law is best avoided. Have you ever applied for a job, or a lease? It's nice having a clean background check.

    • @PaulSpades
      @PaulSpades 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@douglassun8456 Of course you're right. Justice is always served.

    • @maxmeier532
      @maxmeier532 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      People who produce the really valuable things and provide the valuable services are usually middle class at best, with some exceptions.

  • @EduardoEscarez
    @EduardoEscarez 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +133

    20:54 "The core business while growing rapidly was unprofitable, but Neumann diversify into other unprofitable business lines" That line lmao 🤣🤣

    • @ScottLovenberg
      @ScottLovenberg 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I assume after that, the plan was to make up the difference in volume.

  • @jaysdood
    @jaysdood 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    "they invested anyway" - well, in that case they deserved to lose everything they had.

    • @StephenGillie
      @StephenGillie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Man, if someone sprayed me with a fire extinguisher during an investor meeting, they'd be running from the same extinguisher as I chase them down the hallway with it.

    • @iless664
      @iless664 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      “They” didn’t necessarily lose anything. As new investors came on the old ones had the option to sell their holdings at the new newer valuations. Benchmark, for example, made billions in profit from their initial investment.

    • @jaysdood
      @jaysdood 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@iless664I did say deserved, not that they did. I have no idea if they did.

  • @ellenh5468
    @ellenh5468 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    He must be an incredible salesperson to convince people after WeWork that he has any ideas

  • @kibaanazuka332
    @kibaanazuka332 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I remember a chat with friend who was a running a startup and he said that Regus was a lot better than WeWork and had a more professional vibe to their co working spaces compared to WeWork. Also cost, mentioned how much more expensive renting WeWork space was compared to one with Regus

  • @Lithilic
    @Lithilic 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +154

    I may not know much about finance compared to Patrick, but his videos always make me feel like a financial genius compared to the people and companies he showcases. I would be curious to know what the SEC rejection rate is for IPO filings.

    • @benoithudson7235
      @benoithudson7235 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      I would expect the SEC would *always* push back on the first filing and make them fix something, but I haven't been through the process personally. I've been through some similar government-run processes where that's the way it's done, though.
      Now, the CEO getting fired because the SEC asked some basic questions, *that's* unusual.

    • @timop6340
      @timop6340 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It is always easier to observe things afterwards. The actual financial genius part is to skip something that both looks like huge opportunity and fishy af (as long as you are like Patrick who has done a lot of homework). The latter is so easy to miss if the first one can convince you well enough.

  • @rock3tcatU233
    @rock3tcatU233 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Pretty impressive that Joey Cables and Willy Wireless were single handedly running the tech infrastructure of a 44 billion dollar tech company.

  • @SaraAB98
    @SaraAB98 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    This video is so well-made. I have learned the basis of everything I needed to know in order to write a paper on this cult leader and his financial adventures. I still can't believe WeWork , despite having all the opportunities in the world, never reached profitability. Thank you very much, Mr.Boyle 🌺

  • @DarkZombieMan007
    @DarkZombieMan007 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I did work in multiple we work buildings doing construction. The amount of money wasted was ridiculous and the scheduling for construction was awful. Several gc's that were in house from we works were awful and incompetent. They had a big custom made desk with receptacles that fold out that cost over $20k , they had these things they called "eggs" that were at least 40k where kids could sit inside and relax, they had a wall they called a living wall where they taught kids how to be farmers. The money that was spent on light bulbs were like $300 a bulb, they had a light fixture that stretched the entire length of the school space that was imported from Italy and was just ridiculous

    • @tinyleopard6741
      @tinyleopard6741 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @DarkZombieMan007 Man, those are ridiculous investments, there's a way to do those cheaper too, the guy really just wastes money.

  • @burtgallagher6499
    @burtgallagher6499 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +194

    I cannot express how great it is to find a TH-camr who doesn’t shout at the audience, the fact that the content is actually fresh and informative is just gravy. I hope your channel grows from strength to strength!

    • @KunjaBihariKrishna
      @KunjaBihariKrishna 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yeah, a youtuber that is actually dignified and doesn't whore himself out to any rumored algorithm clickbait trick of the day

    • @prw56
      @prw56 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@KunjaBihariKrishna...No? Maybe our definitions of "clickbait trick" differ? I consider any provocative vague titles clickbait, not just the ones that are full of caps and emojis, and every large channel does it, afaik, without exception.
      I mean I enjoy his content and think he does a good job, but he's made videos with titles like "Is The Luxury Goods Bubble About to Burst?" and "Turkey In 2023 - An Economy on The Brink?". What is that if not clickbait?

    • @PeteQuad
      @PeteQuad 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There are actually many of these on TH-cam.

    • @Jehty_
      @Jehty_ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Whenever I read a comment like this I have to wonder what are you doing?
      Why is TH-cam mostly recommending you those horrible channels? Most channels TH-cam recommends to me aren't screaming channels. Most are educational and toned down.
      So I have to assume that it is your fault. Are you mainly subscribed to screaming channels? Are you watching a lot of bad videos? Do you click on every clickbait video title?

    • @burtgallagher6499
      @burtgallagher6499 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Jehty_ fascinating how even the most innocuous comments breed insults on this platform. Glad I partook.

  • @camiloalonso3709
    @camiloalonso3709 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    The robinhood of our time... ladies and gentlemen. Takes money from the dumb rich people and... and that's it

  • @Boertje247
    @Boertje247 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Oh, Good Lord have mercy, Mr. Boyle! Please please please disclose how in the name of all that’s holy do you keep such a deadpan delivery?! I don’t think a financial breakdown has ever been more informative and hilarious at the same time.
    WeWork is the equivalent of a timeshare for 2 weeks in Haiti during Hurricane season…😝

  • @z50king29
    @z50king29 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    WeWork just filed for bankruptcy.... Nice job, Patrick

  • @Wargasm54
    @Wargasm54 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Never underestimate a man who speaks in bumper stickers.

  • @Dan-dg9pi
    @Dan-dg9pi 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    Masayoshi Son + Jim Cramer + Andreesen. The only way this could be a bigger scam is if San Bankman-Fried was part of the deal.

    • @krozareq
      @krozareq 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      If Jim Cramer's bullish, you know it's time to short the SPAC.

    • @roc7880
      @roc7880 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      SBF is a fraud but not stupid. He would have not invested in Neumann

    • @alexanderSydneyOz
      @alexanderSydneyOz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But there was no scam.

    • @robertbeisert3315
      @robertbeisert3315 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@alexanderSydneyOz neither are MLM's. They publish their shit earnings reports, and they have disclaimers to the fact that their products probably don't work.
      We still call them "scams" because they are exploitative, manipulative organizations that create a cult-like reality distortion

    • @maxmeier532
      @maxmeier532 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Dont forget being named on the Forbes 30 under 30 list.

  • @AMVH2012
    @AMVH2012 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I think that's exactly what the housing crisis needs, I'm sure Adam will be a great landlord who doesn't make everything worse.

  • @Feastalisk
    @Feastalisk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Adam must be a hell of a Salesman 😂

  • @mipmipmipmipmip
    @mipmipmipmipmip 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +102

    Well, Techcrunch invited Adam Neuman on stage, it's also a matter of tech journalism absolutely failing to do actual journalism.

    • @alidaraie
      @alidaraie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Something everybody needs to learn about Journalism (in general) is that they are the lowest of the low in terms of both intellect and integrity, no matter the field

    • @nitehawk86
      @nitehawk86 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      So that would be business as usual for tech journalism?

    • @DG-to6by
      @DG-to6by 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Hate to be the one to tell you this.... But that's ALL journalism now, not just tech journalism.

    • @FadkinsDiet
      @FadkinsDiet 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Tech crunch has never been journalism.

    • @Ramonatho
      @Ramonatho 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@alidaraieI'm guessing you're one of those people who screams at the TV every time they say the groups of people you don't like are actually human and deserve life

  • @EamonCoyle
    @EamonCoyle 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

    I think we have fallen upon his next big move; "we didn't work" - a consultancy firm to advise VC firms because they seem to need it !!

  • @Martin_Edmondson
    @Martin_Edmondson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How you kept a straight face with reading all that.. I have no idea. Bravo!

  • @chilbiyito
    @chilbiyito 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Proof that a lot of people in finance aren't competent

    • @Ajibolaa
      @Ajibolaa หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s why they go into finance in the first place after failing at science finance is next if that doesn’t work then arts. I mean the supposed numbers people don’t even take math courses in university so Yh 😂 no shocker there

  • @quixomega
    @quixomega 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    I'm shocked We Work didn't die during the COVID19 crisis.

    • @edhuber3557
      @edhuber3557 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Maybe still too much VC $$$.

    • @RupertMDoc
      @RupertMDoc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      It pretty much did die during Covid, but companies are bureaucracies and the "death certificate" took a few years to finalize.

    • @FranciscoFerreira-gc6xu
      @FranciscoFerreira-gc6xu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It did but you can't really kill a zombie, its already dead.

    • @susanavenir
      @susanavenir 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's because they ate $3 million worth of horse de-wormer and switched on the flashlights they shoved up their butts. A world-famous real estate magnate clued them in on that - I've seen the video.

    • @mkvenner2
      @mkvenner2 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think what finally killed it was the fed raising interest rates and continuing to do so.

  • @elizabethwoodley4340
    @elizabethwoodley4340 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +233

    I can’t express how much I love your mini docs, Patrick! In a world of cookie cutter documentaries & news, you and a few other TH-cam greats are invaluable ❤

    • @kathduncan9618
      @kathduncan9618 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Same! I love his dry delivery of hilarious character assassinations. And his accent - it's unique.

    • @count7ero
      @count7ero 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      what other youtubers?

    • @jr8209
      @jr8209 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yes you can

    • @torijones5194
      @torijones5194 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@count7ero. Cold Fusion, Company Man, and Bright Sun Films all do great mini business documentaries.

    • @codycast
      @codycast 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cringe man. Get a room.

  • @apollion888
    @apollion888 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Did you write or steal "Spoke mostly in slogans"?
    That is one of the best sentences I have ever heard, it says everything you need to know in 4 words

  • @demilung
    @demilung หลายเดือนก่อน

    Somethink WeWork definitely was great for was renting an office space table to show a physical address for a shell company. You could have a legal brick and mortar address with a contract to prove it without anyone ever physically meeting anyone. Just brilliant.

  • @thepostapocalyptictrio4762
    @thepostapocalyptictrio4762 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    $45 a month for a desk sounds like a great deal for a space rental, but that desk was probably the one closest to Adam Neumann😂🎉

  • @djangobanjo2673
    @djangobanjo2673 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +139

    Yet another example of way too much capital distributed up top, into the hands of a few wealthy companies/institutions/people, to be squandered away, partially lost, partially redistributed into another single individual's pocket. Imagine what you could achieve on a societal level with 700 million dollars, and this is just one, prominent case.

    • @honkhonk8009
      @honkhonk8009 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep. I agree with Lefties on this one.
      Our nations greatest scientific achievments were back when we had the military funnelling BILLIONS into scientific endeavours. Shit like Bell Labs.
      Google has billions lying around, and doesnt know what the fuck to do with it.
      Look at what Elon Musk managed to achieve with a fraction of the capital. Made infinitely more tech than google couldv dreamed of.
      Google/Facebook are glorified marketing firms.
      Apple is a fashion company.
      Your average company these days makes just as much software they do.
      Amazon(AWS) and OpenAI are the few actual Tech Companies out there.

    • @honkhonk8009
      @honkhonk8009 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The worlds most lucrative launch service that actually pushed mandkind forward, was funded with significantly less private capital.

    • @francisnopantses1108
      @francisnopantses1108 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      You are describing exactly how high GINI index leads to stagnant growth.

    • @randomuser5443
      @randomuser5443 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      We need to force venture capital to function like normal investments

    • @notme222
      @notme222 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Fools and their money are soon parted.
      "Squandered away" and "lost" does mean the money went into the economy. On a "societal level." If that's really your goal you should be cheering failures like this.

  • @GudieveNing
    @GudieveNing 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Coworking doesn't work because everyone is focused on their thing but want people from others doing their thing. Makes staff vulnerable to poaching. Distracting too because everyone is walking around and interacting. Its a cool environment, but not a way to run a productive business. A seperate private office space where you can leave your gear and be isolated from spies and competitors is far better.

  • @uberacx
    @uberacx 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Very well made analytic video. Learned something from this. Liked and subscribed! I remember visiting a friend at a we work office years ago before the pandemic. The atmosphere was attractive. Giving the sense of community over boring office life. If the ceo and investors weren’t so greedy. We work might still have a place in this world

  • @matthewmilan6979
    @matthewmilan6979 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    I hear WeWork had plans start a lavatory space rental company called WeWee.

    • @zucchinigreen
      @zucchinigreen 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂

    • @travisadams4470
      @travisadams4470 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      you have got to be shitting me 😂

    • @alidaraie
      @alidaraie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@travisadams4470 Chill, he's just taking the piss

    • @user-iu3bp8os5n
      @user-iu3bp8os5n 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Its subsidiaries are WePee and WePoo.

  • @ronarnold1507
    @ronarnold1507 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The dry wry humor always keeps me coming back for more.

  • @iristhorne6521
    @iristhorne6521 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    You know what? I’m glad he did this. He is the kind of person who could start a literal cult of personality, who could sucker in hundreds of thousands of people into some pyramid scheme or whatever he wanted. Those kinds of people usually end up building too fast and eventually falling in on their house of cards. I’m just glad that the people who fell with him only lost money instead of their lives and futures and relationships, and it seems from this video like the people who lost were people who had money to invest like VCs, not the people renting offices.
    He’s insane and has way too much money (would not be surprised if it was from less savory sources) but at least he’s chosen to do this instead of preying on vulnerable people.

  • @Nick-gk7qs
    @Nick-gk7qs 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The deadpan zingers in these absolutely kill me. Great vid!

  • @brnnntrnt
    @brnnntrnt 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    The combination of your serious delivery and the montage including funny animations always cracks me up. Who knew I would burst out laughing multiple times watching a financial video

  • @LukeAvedon
    @LukeAvedon 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    "The clothes were difficult to sell because they were horrible." HAHAHA had me laughing out loud in the communal office space (like WeWork) I am sitting in watching this video.

    • @lindaholtzman5374
      @lindaholtzman5374 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Or maybe potential customers noticed that babies already come with built-in fat pads!

  • @davidkey4272
    @davidkey4272 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Whenever I am talking to VC and start to get just a tickle of nervousness and intimidation, I just think about WeWork and instantly feel much better.

  • @MrBamshy
    @MrBamshy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I always come back for the humorous sarcasm as he tells these business tales. I enjoy it!

  • @samsonsoturian6013
    @samsonsoturian6013 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +125

    You know, if they actually bought the offices they rented they'd actually be making money with the same business model. Nothing spectacular, but there would be no struggle to justify the company's existence.

    • @ronald3836
      @ronald3836 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      Buying would just have created a very huge debt load that they would have had to service. They would have been losing money just the same.

    • @slouch186
      @slouch186 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Wait, they didn't own the properties? I thought the whole point of WeWork was that it was secretly a real estate company

    • @oisinquinn9469
      @oisinquinn9469 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      ​@slouch186 nope they never owned anything 😂

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      @@slouch186 No, it's a subtle but vital detail. They paid up front for a lease lasting a decade on average, then rented out on a month-to-month basis

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ronald3836 It's called being a landlord. If you can't scale, then you can't scale

  • @nataschavisser573
    @nataschavisser573 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +186

    As a South African, I am really insulted by Newman's condesending attitude towards the African continent. I live in a city of 5 milion plus. We have plenty of office space to let. In addition, shared office spaces have been available for small businesses in my city since at least the late 1990s. WeWork did not offer anything new, it was just an attempt to brand an existing real estate business model.

    • @TheThreatenedSwan
      @TheThreatenedSwan 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Wonder why no one wants to invest in Africa

    • @melvingibson4525
      @melvingibson4525 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@TheThreatenedSwanall the white supremacists right

    • @capitan_gorgonzolazola
      @capitan_gorgonzolazola 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      You live in south africa a country in risk of civil war / insurrection.
      What are you talking geezer

    • @carlost856
      @carlost856 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      ​@@capitan_gorgonzolazolayou've been fed far right propaganda.

    • @TheThreatenedSwan
      @TheThreatenedSwan 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@carlost856Delusional. The crime rates don't lie, neither do people who openly call for killing white people and stealing their property.

  • @meg2231
    @meg2231 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    “And I pretend to be nice on this channel…”
    me: immediately clicks subscribe

    • @rioluna6058
      @rioluna6058 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i usually dont subscribe to a channel before i have watch at least 3 videos of the same creator and ihave watch a couple of videos from this channel already and when he said that i inmediately subscribe