I Stopped Taking VPN Sponsorships for 2 Years...Did You Even Notice?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 3.2K

  • @MysteryMii
    @MysteryMii 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10502

    Real ones remember TunnelBear before LTT dropped them for PIA after they were bought out by McAfee.

    • @ishaqahmed._
      @ishaqahmed._ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      wow i forgot they used to take sponsorships from TunnelBear. good days

    • @moonkehh
      @moonkehh 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +481

      wow, i feel old

    • @pedro4205
      @pedro4205 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +823

      TunnelBear was almost a part of LTT

    • @TheQuickSilver101
      @TheQuickSilver101 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +248

      That feels like forever ago

    • @Kylian381
      @Kylian381 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +147

      That long eh? Man we are getting old

  • @SpeedWeed97
    @SpeedWeed97 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2214

    Personally what i hate about vpn ads is the stupid fake discounts, that shit should be illegal

    • @MuttleyGames
      @MuttleyGames 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +124

      It is in Europe...

    • @randykeith1203
      @randykeith1203 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@MuttleyGames everywhere else is fair game tmk

    • @hawksnake3372
      @hawksnake3372 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +135

      I love the notion of ~85% off when you sign up for a 5 year plan. Mfs out here with absolutely no commitment issues, just signing up for half a decade of service from a company that’s only a few years old.

    • @CREDLACE
      @CREDLACE 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I believe it is INDEED illegal in Canada and Australia (at least according to IH)
      So yeah, Americabro, CAPITALISM AHOY!

    • @staringinward
      @staringinward 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hawksnake3372 I signed up for Nord using that deal when they first started and still have a subscription. I emailed them and said I'd like to extend it indefinitely and they gave me another 4 years with a Dedicated IP for 25 bucks a year. For how versatile it is at the cost and how well it works for me vs. all the others its a steal.

  • @c6m
    @c6m 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +979

    It’s hard to believe the actual controversy leading to PIA getting dropped was forgotten. It wasn’t Tom Scott’s video, that was Oct 2019. PIA getting bought by former malware peddlers Kape and the unsavoury characters that came with it was the actual story that led to them getting dropped in WAN show Feb 7 2020 (btw the unlisted QnA with them has the crypto hack link in the description lol)
    Kape (who are one of those 24 companies) doesn’t appear in this script and the no logs cases were from before that buy out. This is critical information when talking about safety in a less-free jurisdiction because the leadership is totally different. This isn’t meaningless nuance, missing this point is negligent.
    Bringing up this track record without the track record of the acquirer is dishonesty I don’t remember ever seeing in an LTT video before, it’s obscene. Teddy’s history is clearly alluded to here, so I have to assume Kape’s record came up in research. How doesn’t it get spoken about?
    The Deloitte audits are great counter arguments! There’s an interesting video here if it was about why to trust PIA despite Kape! But that’s a hard script to write, and honestly this video just felt like a ritual to preempt arguments before accepting VPN sponsorships again, and the eagerness to have an affiliate link in this video really drove that point home.
    FWIW I don’t mind VPN sponsorships, I do mind revisionist history and critical questions being sidestepped knowingly or unknowingly (and I don’t know which is worse). I used to trust LMG a lot, but this has me really reevaluating that in a way I didn’t expect.

    • @layth888
      @layth888 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +85

      This I also remember kape being the sole reason why they dropped them like how they dropped tunnel bear when Mcafee bought them. They were probably asked which VPN they recommend and alot of them used PIA so I get the idea of going with PIA but I dont want the justfications of why you are taking PIA to be that they are different from the rest more so that out of the ones that are easily accessible and easy to use this is the one we have been using and it has worked great for us. But the transparency and the way you do this type of journalism is extremly important. The way the scirpt was written you would think that PIA isnt part of those 24 companies. The track record like you talked about was before the acquisition. And open source doesnt mean safe. it means it has the ablity to be reviewed. It just leaves a bad taste in my mouth i dont mind VPNs sponsherships but this felt a bit biased with some intent to make PIA look much better. The video did leave some indirect messaging like the deloitte audits as counter arguments but again the full context was not given here

    • @yeetisnomore
      @yeetisnomore 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      I was def worried about Kape, and really glad someone brought it up in comments. Thanks dude!

    • @MrJcTTK
      @MrJcTTK 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Celphirio i thought they said that they did pay for it

    • @turtlelore2
      @turtlelore2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      ​@Celphirio just putting it out there, but why are you still watching then? By the metric that most of you guys put out, literally every single TH-cam channel would be considered bad.
      Sponsorship = bad
      Not enough detail = bad
      Association with scandal = bad
      Getting money = bad
      I'm not saying ltt is perfect. But getting angry at someone for playing the game that is set up for them isn't going to solve anything. You don't have to like the real world, but you have to live in it.

    • @DeinonychusCowboy
      @DeinonychusCowboy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      This is a really weird aggressive take vs "it has literally been half a decade and the complex details were forgotten or difficult to distill into a video" dude. Hanlon's razor. Also chill out.

  • @GileadMaerlyn
    @GileadMaerlyn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3335

    2:15 I did that back in the 2000's. Thanks Hamachi.

    • @RayRayIsCoolio
      @RayRayIsCoolio 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +408

      now that's a name I haven't heard in a long time 👴🏻

    • @szalaigabor1714
      @szalaigabor1714 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +420

      That name is responsible for me becoming an engineer. (Thanks Minecraft: Tekkit & Hamachi & friends)

    • @WyattOShea
      @WyattOShea 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Same

    • @nanielwolf5768
      @nanielwolf5768 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Radmin vpn is cleaner, jumped to it :)

    • @NETBotic
      @NETBotic 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      Remember the days of people saying Hamachi wasn't secure because people were using it the wrong way?

  • @amithmkini
    @amithmkini 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1614

    One thing I hate about VPN marketing is the pricing page with a countdown clock at the top offering "Limited offer". Even PIA does this bullshit. Linus, I know you are against this (see PC Speed up tools video), can you ask PIA to remove them (along with the absurd 85% off marketing)?

    • @ACuteAura
      @ACuteAura 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +105

      it has a dual purpose, not only can they sell themselves as an awesome deal, they can also charge you all that money you supposedly saved upon auto-renewal.

    • @flamingscar5263
      @flamingscar5263 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bring it up on the LTTforms, they have an entire section dedicated to complaing about sponsors

    • @kingchangling
      @kingchangling 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +77

      i checked the site and ran the number. they offer a 1 month plan at 11.95. for 3 years thats 430.20 USD if you paid each month per month. so while its an absurd deal saying 83% off, it isnt incorrect that you are actually saving money by subscribing for 3 years. i mean a lot of services that have monthly chargers and yearly charges usually throw in some sort of discount for when you subscribe yearly vs monthly.

    • @caffeinesippingman
      @caffeinesippingman 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Where can I save %85!?! /s

    • @manuelwitrago6511
      @manuelwitrago6511 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@caffeinesippingman...by switching to geckos!!!subscribe NOW!!!
      joke.

  • @svgPhoenix
    @svgPhoenix 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +560

    I laughed when they suggested getting a fake email from Proton mail, but then didn't even acknowledge Proton VPN

    • @Wolphie
      @Wolphie 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +79

      Agreed, it's a solid vpn as well ngl

    • @PerKroon
      @PerKroon 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +91

      Proton VPN are really worth mentioning. Just the fact that is located in a country with the world strictest privacy and monetary laws combined with no logs makes it one of the best. But again a VPN are not safe so any of them (logs or not) can leak data.

    • @JansHeikkinen
      @JansHeikkinen 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

      @@PerKroon I hope you're aware that those ""laws"" you mention haven't held up in the past. While ProtonVPN is a pretty good service, I'd still be quite wary of it. They don't have the greatest track record, considering, on the email side of things, that climate activist they helped French authorities catch by logging IPs...

    • @Owen2108
      @Owen2108 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PerKroon Maybe they 'can'. But Proton haasnt had a single leak since 2017. No scandals, no false promises, unlimited free or paid version, the endorsement of the entire darknet (the merchants, importantly).
      In my opinion, nothing tops it, whether that be the service quality alone or including the administrative aspect.

    • @robertwright8844
      @robertwright8844 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JansHeikkinen I think you should read more about that case. If the activist had used Proton VPN, their IP address wouldn't have been turned over to French authorities. They have to comply with their national laws to continue existing, but Swiss law allows VPN providers to refuse logging, which is Proton's policy. In general, they are a highly trusted organization with a long track record.
      It's not their fault the activist didn't follow basic opsec procedures like using a no-logs VPN. Mullvad would have worked just as well.

  • @Sam_on_YouTube
    @Sam_on_YouTube 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +652

    Tom Scott very specifically worked with a VPN provider only when they approved a script that wasn't false. He always wanted to work with VPNs. His original VPN takedown script was SUPPOSED to be sponsored by a VPN company, but they refused.

    • @Andreas0427
      @Andreas0427 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

      @@juanmondragon They kept trying to change the script, Tom even says so in the video: "I found a company that was willing to sponsor the video. Unfortunately, they kept asking for changes, and we disagreed on those, so at the last minute I have had to blank their name out."

    • @ArthurRichardSole
      @ArthurRichardSole 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      ​@@juanmondragonTom's first VPN video was meant to be sponsered by a VPN company. They wanted a lot of last minute changes to the script they couldn't come to an agreement on so Tom had to block out the name in the video.

    • @theEtch
      @theEtch 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah his video about it actually forced them to do that, and for some time other youtubers' sponsorships were also less FOMO heavy, but that seems to have somewhat reversed again lately...

    • @kay1229
      @kay1229 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I thought that was just a joke lol

  • @schnow265
    @schnow265 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1674

    Mullvard allows you to mail them your subscription in cash.
    Yes, MAILING.

    • @BronyumHexofloride
      @BronyumHexofloride 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +146

      Or pay with Monero

    • @guyman7776
      @guyman7776 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I used to use Mullvad for a while but man them dropping port forwarding is a huge bummer that I had to drop them.

    • @mostsaneperson
      @mostsaneperson 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      although it’s not tied to billing info your address is still on it tho

    • @pixelPantsuu
      @pixelPantsuu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +178

      @@mostsaneperson put a different address on it?

    • @seraph535
      @seraph535 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      Sadly if I tried that, the post workers would probably take the cash out of the envelope before it got to Mullvads post box

  • @syrusxd
    @syrusxd 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +641

    saying "this video isn't sponsored by PIA" to increase credibility that your opinions are your own, then saying "PIA is our exclusive VPN partner and here's our affiliate link" while simultaneously not mentioning any other good VPN providers feels pretty misleading as a viewer

    • @careem3463
      @careem3463 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      Exactly. I just don't get it, why tf would you post anything like this when you have controversy background like they do?
      Why just not reject idea before the script is even written?
      On the 15th second of the video I already have that taste in my mouth that even if that video is not ad itself, like they said, I already know that conclusion will be setup for next 5000 videos sponsored by some VPN shit. Why just not skip this part.

    • @furythree
      @furythree 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

      This is assuming the alternatives passed the criteria they outlined for PIA to qualify as their partner.
      They basically provided a laundry list for the viewer to look for in other providers too. I dont think its linus job to do all your homework for you
      And an affiliate link is not a sponsorship. It's just their reccomendation that they can benefit from providing after doing the vetting
      TH-camrs use amazon affiliate links all the time. Doesnt mean it's an amazon sponsored video

    • @baboonaiih
      @baboonaiih 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Omg grow up

    • @Wooskii1
      @Wooskii1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yeah I kinda feel ya, I already got the vibe that taking a PIA sponsorship was not only already back on the table but it's been wanted/ missed/ ready & waiting for even longer.
      I was just hoping to hear something about the competition, specifically which VPNs to avoid and why, or which ones seem to be run in a good way (ram)/ location (BVI) but I got little more than "Trust me bro" and "We're sticking with PIA".
      I guess I mean the video felt less like an informative guide to VPNs, and more like just another ad for PIA.

    • @syrusxd
      @syrusxd 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@furythree while you aren't wrong, I do think its worth considering that they get paid when you sign up for PIA, and as they said in the video, they will soon be paid directly by PIA for sponsor segments. While the video doesn't have clear talking points, a writer might be more inclined to speak favorably of the company and leave out controversies, as well as not promote other good VPN options, in order to benefit PIA (and therefore, themselves as PIA may want to pay more/stay longer).

  • @cerealport2726
    @cerealport2726 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +643

    I never really trusted that commercially available cheap/free VPNs would be anywhere near as secure or private as advertised, but they do make it easy to "change" countries.

    • @IndianGeek5589
      @IndianGeek5589 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

      Proton VPN has a decent free tier. And they're trusted by everyone I think.

    • @Fiirow1
      @Fiirow1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@IndianGeek5589 Are there ads?
      If not, then they are making their money with your data.
      I have no faith in "free" products when they have a large upkeep cost, and VPN servers do have a rather large upkeep cost, and nobody is gonna spend that much money for nothing.

    • @TheBigAEC
      @TheBigAEC 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@IndianGeek5589they stopped giving the option to pick servers on the free tier. When I'm financially capable of paying for a VPN I'm picking PIA instead because of that.

    • @ExperiMentalDon
      @ExperiMentalDon 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@IndianGeek5589I've never used it, but just remember that trustED and trustWORTHY are two different things.

    • @armaan_44
      @armaan_44 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@IndianGeek5589even proton vpn has now gone to scummy side, they force you a random free server and put a timer when you try to change it

  • @BenjaminEmm
    @BenjaminEmm 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +765

    The crazy marketing tactics are what get me. Even going through Linus' link it's "GET 82% OFF + 4 MONTHS FREE!!!" Then when you get to their checkout there is a timer ticking down, making them look like the sketchy "speed up your PC" tools in a previous LTT video. All of that on top of the option being to buy it for two years, and in big bold letters it's priced per month, it's not until you (maybe) read the tiny grey text on an already grey background you see the price for the year.
    Oh, and you can't just buy 1 year. It's 1 month, 6 months, or 2 years!

    • @thegreatdodo5092
      @thegreatdodo5092 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Surprised he's a sellout? Look up proton - the only real option

    • @truffles
      @truffles 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can buy 1 year. It's right on their website when you click Get PIA VPN

    • @threetrees313
      @threetrees313 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      I signed up back when he was sponsered by them and its a recurring yearly sub for like £30. Can use it on 10 devices too so got my family using it. £30 a year for 10 people is pretty damn good value i think!

    • @threetrees313
      @threetrees313 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @Nigelfarij Because £30 divided by 10 = £3. For a year. In fairness I do pay the full 30 and let everyone leach of me but If I got everyone to chip in it would be £3 each.

    • @threetrees313
      @threetrees313 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @Nigelfarij Just checked and now it's unlimeted devices! So I could literally share my account with the world lol

  • @realcartoongirl
    @realcartoongirl 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +351

    the problem with vpns is a lot of people use the same ip and websites will flag "suspicious activity" every time you visit any site

    • @jboblk
      @jboblk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      The captas are so annoying

    • @PhyloGenesis
      @PhyloGenesis 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      The more people that use VPNs, the less websites will be able to reject that traffic because they will lose too many users.

    • @lightingman117
      @lightingman117 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Plus CGNAT keeps expanding. I'm amazed they can flag anyone these days.

    • @saidtorres3
      @saidtorres3 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@lightingman117Only fortunate residential people do not have CGNAT.

    • @MAST
      @MAST 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@PhyloGenesis No. You talk about a completely unrealistic scenario.
      1. Most people don't even know what VPN are.
      2. Why pay for VPN, when you can do things without it, without wasting money, or especially when u have free VPNs and most people don't care as much about privacy, to pay for that.
      3. You can't put VPN servers in some countries.
      4. I think more VPN users would very likely result in governments banning VPN, because more and more criminals would use VPNs.
      5. Prolly VPNs wouldn't hold that much traffic and they would have rise prices.
      6. VPS would become target for hackers.
      7. But even if somehow this wouldn't be the case, then you would have like google, microsoft giving free VPNs just to gate keep your personal information, by forcing websites to not ban their traffic, or they would erase them from search engines etc.

  • @RIPSLYMEFAN
    @RIPSLYMEFAN 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1519

    If it isn’t Mullvad then what is it

    • @Padlock_Steve
      @Padlock_Steve 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      nord

    • @BrandonDoran00
      @BrandonDoran00 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +250

      Proton

    • @ansonx10
      @ansonx10 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +167

      Trash, probably. Mullvad seems really good

    • @i-wanna-be-adored
      @i-wanna-be-adored 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +94

      AirVPN , mullvad no longer has port forwarding

    • @Weeblon
      @Weeblon 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      @@ansonx10 maybe also proton but definetly Mullvad

  • @thilom.9925
    @thilom.9925 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +155

    I am from Germany and I have been using a VPN for years now to access most of the US streaming services (Netflix, MAX, Hulu, Shudder, Paramount, Starz, etc.), buy & rent movies from Fandango or Vudu and get US video recommendations on TH-cam. And I love it! And thats what I am paying for. I never believed the protection bs, VPN providers claimed... And I absolutely HATE when TH-cam channels brainlessly read out the standard text they agreed on for the promotion deal.

    • @gogereaver349
      @gogereaver349 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      why i am a pia fan they never said these things.

    • @realcartoongirl
      @realcartoongirl 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      nah you obviously didn't pay for all of those services at once
      clearly you use vpn for "activities"

    • @mastroitek
      @mastroitek 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I read online that in gemany it is "legal" to pirate stuff for private use, you know if that is true?

    • @ThePogo09
      @ThePogo09 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@mastroitek it is legal to make a "privatkopie" which means that you can copy media you bought for privat use. but you acutally cant because as soon as you download it without buying or bypass any copyprotection its illegal
      so technical yes its legal, practically its not

    • @Vss077
      @Vss077 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      for netflix ur account have to be made with the US vpn then. when i try to connect from my netflix account with an US ip it wont show all movies/series - basically only the ones that a licensed world wide. "When Netflix is ​​used through a VPN, we only show series and films for which we have worldwide rights, such as Squid Game or Stranger Things ."
      so the whole thing is kinda useless if u want to hop countries & either have multiple accounts or always missing some content. so in short: marketing bs. since its not like that as they claimed to be.

  • @mkennedy150
    @mkennedy150 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +84

    Still sounds like an Ad for PIA. Would have nice to see a comparison between top VPNs.

  • @ShrkBiT
    @ShrkBiT 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +740

    I appreciate the transparency. If there's anything we learnt from recent years is that literally every major company has a scummy side. MS with their ads in paid OS, Apple with their active blocking of Right-to-repair and their whole ecosystem, EA, Xbox, Ubisoft, Sony with their middle fingers to gamers, Anker/Eufy with their privacy issues, EK, Asus, Amazon...it doesn't end, there wouldn't be a company left to endorse. At least giving honest feedback and remaining very critical of these sponsors through contract clauses will have a chance to educate the viewers on the "least-worst" pick.

    • @beansnrice321
      @beansnrice321 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      At least regarding windows, I just block a lot of that bs with windows firewall.

    • @ComradePhoenix
      @ComradePhoenix 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Its endemic to the system, really.

    • @X_irtz
      @X_irtz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      @@beansnrice321 Pretty sure he meant the in-built ads in Windows 11.

    • @manuelwitrago6511
      @manuelwitrago6511 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      still happy i bought Adguard's family lifetime on sell years ago. Don't remember seeing any ad almost anywhere.
      *ads

    • @gqqggq7127
      @gqqggq7127 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      So sad how the norm now is just companies with a rapist/mafia mentality with regards to services and privacy, and all you can do is just try to go with what is screwing you the least.

  • @dinothegonzo
    @dinothegonzo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +335

    Good video and I agree with a lot of the points here. My only issue here is that the PIA affiliate link's second step is a plan selection page with a "timer" that creates a sense of urgency to users. This artificial panic created by marketers is against the spirit of informed purchasing decision. By causing the customer to act as quickly as possible, they miss out on all the information they need to learn to make sure they're making the right choice.
    I trust that you and your team vouched for PIA, but I think such shady tactics are quite scummy and should be called out.

    • @NicoleMay316
      @NicoleMay316 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      Good criticism, and this business practice should honestly be abolished

    • @Kaenguruu
      @Kaenguruu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@NicoleMay316 I wouldn't be surprised if you could get the EU to pass a law against them. Don't think it's gonna happen in the US though

    • @MultiMrAsd
      @MultiMrAsd 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Kaenguruu The EU has a law against them, unfortunately it’s rarely enforced

    • @thedragonhunter
      @thedragonhunter 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      a sence of urency is a legit way to get a contract nullified under u.s. law. (yes. even in arbitration)

    • @kabadisha
      @kabadisha 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I'm also not a fan of how they won't accept my disposable virtual card. They want to make sure I forget to shop around when renewal time comes around. They wouldn't even take my proper Revolut card.

  • @Kraviken
    @Kraviken 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I love how your commercial actually contain some useful information. Just when I am about to stop watching your commercial, I still get hooked.

  • @Ethereum-Mev
    @Ethereum-Mev 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +655

    An ad for a future ad, that's just amazing

    • @bobowon5450
      @bobowon5450 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +79

      but don't let this ad for a future ad distract you .....our sponsor!

    • @monterraythehomeless
      @monterraythehomeless 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yo, imagine the deal you'd get on a 3 min ad read?

    • @z0phi3l
      @z0phi3l 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      LTT over here meta ading

    • @swagatrout3075
      @swagatrout3075 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Sponsor video because I want another source of income with another sponsor in the video and as I have already spoken on wan show it's super lucrative for us so money money money 🤑 ya.

    • @pingandpong674
      @pingandpong674 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Best ad they've done or will do for PIA and they're not even getting paid for it by PIA

  • @viralbox5603
    @viralbox5603 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1470

    I am missing Tom 😢

    • @stevem719
      @stevem719 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      I signed up for his newsletter, so I still get him in my email every week.

    • @manuelwitrago6511
      @manuelwitrago6511 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      ...Tom? never great with names.

    • @Linkman8912
      @Linkman8912 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

      ​@@manuelwitrago6511Tom Scott, duh

    • @korumann
      @korumann 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

      Sign up for his newsletter, it's a fun little read at the beginning of each week. There's also his podcast lateral, but with the death of Google podcasts & refusal to upload full episodes to TH-cam I don't have any recommendations on where to listen to it.

    • @franklingoodwin
      @franklingoodwin 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@stevem719How does he fit? 😂

  • @MarshallZelder
    @MarshallZelder 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +164

    What is this Ad inception you have to fall through one Ad to get to the next Ad only to fiind out it was all an Ad all along

    • @williamyoung9401
      @williamyoung9401 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This sounds like an NPR story (sponsored content).

    • @c50m4
      @c50m4 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yeah what the hell. This is just a sponsered video all along!

  • @todarfclips
    @todarfclips 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +218

    Services like DeleteMe are the next VPN in this context imo

    •  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I'm sure they checked with as many lawyers as they can afford to make sure their claims aren't contestable.

    • @keithb6344
      @keithb6344 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Helps remove your data from hundreds of data brokers. As long as the claim is helps with some, it’s fine. If it becomes, removes you from everything that’s a problem.

    • @TerryDax
      @TerryDax 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      VPNs are entirely useless. There's a massive exploit in the infrastructure that VPN's use, which allows bad actors and nodes to de-anonymize people. Utterly useless. The fact that Linus acts like they still work against the government / special interest groups is laughable, given that he knows exactly that.

    • @SianaGearz
      @SianaGearz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I do wonder if it's a protection racket where they actually seek out data on potential customers and seed it to the so-called "data brokers" when you're not subscribed, say when you have cancelled your subscription.
      Tom Scott better come out of retirement just once.

    • @LimabeanStudios
      @LimabeanStudios 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@keithb6344yeah the "hundreds of data brokers" line feels funny. Like does it even matter if there are more they can't delete it from?

  • @rexjohannes98
    @rexjohannes98 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +259

    PIA is one of the ones owned by just 24 companies (Kape) and thier parent company also owns VPN review sites where PIA is under the most recommended vpns.

    • @nonchalanto
      @nonchalanto 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      Neither of those facts are an argument why PIA is a bad VPN. Do you have any information about the actual service they provide and why it’s subpar/dangerous?

    • @jensen1646
      @jensen1646 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      @@FullSweatTryhard ...So don't use it? Like what was stated in the video? They don't force you to use their client.

    • @someoneelse1550
      @someoneelse1550 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FullSweatTryhard That's... not true. Crossrider was a way to bundle apps together and was good at doing it, but it was *abused* by third parties to spread malware through their platform.

    • @React2Quick
      @React2Quick 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FullSweatTryhard Then use Mullvad or Proton or literally any other VPN

    • @iPhone5244
      @iPhone5244 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      What’s your point

  • @dj_chateau
    @dj_chateau 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Linus really needs to stop talking about infosec. He's so terrible at it. This whole video is him justifying a sponsorship from a VPN providers by cloaking it in "education".
    Make no mistake, you shouldn't trust his sponsors based on anything he's saying here. It comes down to the fact with a VPN, you're using someone else's network. There's no other aspect to consider.
    Either you trust that VPN provider or you don't. No ad or shitty justification video should play into your purchasing decision.

  • @HyperDroids
    @HyperDroids 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1165

    That hairstyle's giving me "There's Something about Mary" vibes.

    • @SyntheticFuture
      @SyntheticFuture 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Classic 👌🏻

    • @v3g7nlif37
      @v3g7nlif37 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      "There's Something about Luke"

    • @HXRDWIREDGaming
      @HXRDWIREDGaming 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That hairstyle reminds me of the flintstones

    • @phosphate66
      @phosphate66 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Linus always trying to do some crazy shit with his hair 😂

    • @nickmurray7703
      @nickmurray7703 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was wondering if there was a channel super fun video released that may explain this....

  • @UnawareBlaire
    @UnawareBlaire 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +248

    PIA is owned by Kape Technologies, which owns ExpressVPN and a few others. They are also located within the 5 eyes countries.
    I do find it funny how VPN sponsorships now just freely encourage the use of their products to break terms of service on other platforms.

    • @GrumpiestKitten
      @GrumpiestKitten 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

      What's even funnier is that circumventing regional blocks is regarded by TH-cam ToS as "hacking" meaning that VPN adverts that demonstrate this functionality are technically violating youtube's terms.

    • @michaels.4527
      @michaels.4527 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nice, didn't know they owned ExpressVPN. I've been using them since that Russian ambassador was assassinated. A communication was linked to one of their IPs, so the Turkish government raided and seized their servers but just ended up proving their no logs claim.
      To me, having staff arrested at gun point, servers physically taken by a pissed off government agency, and still not being able to give user data, was a lot better proof than any audit could be.

    • @penvzila
      @penvzila 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      It's also funny how the founder of expressvpn are "former" CIA agent

    • @SuperSmashDolls
      @SuperSmashDolls 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The vast majority of VPN users that actually need to hide something don't need to care about Five Eyes because the CIA isn't going to burn SIGINT sources on catching casual BitTorrent users. And they sure as fuck aren't going to do that for people watching the wrong country's Netflix catalog (which probably isn't even a crime, at least for the viewer). Being able to resist a court order for logs is good enough.
      If you do need to worry about Five Eyes then you have bigger problems than just finding a VPN run by a US adversary.

    • @SuperSmashDolls
      @SuperSmashDolls 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@penvzila It's even funnier how TOR is actually a US Navy project designed specifically for CIA spies in foreign countries to hide their traffic. They released TOR *specifically* so that people using it to hide their own traffic would provide plausible deniability for those CIA spies, because having a super-special CIA encryption protocol that nobody else used would blow their cover.

  • @dyto2287
    @dyto2287 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    PIA is owned by the same company as ExpressVPN. 🤣 Seems like LTT got paid nice money for sponsorship.

    • @ICE0124
      @ICE0124 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And guess what! That company also owns more VPNs like CyberGhost, Zenmate and multiple VPN review websites where coincidentally their VPNs are always at the top. And for the cherry on top their company named Kape used to distribute malware in the past but then rebranded to hide from the backslash.

  • @nilus2k
    @nilus2k 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    One thing that bugs me is the ads about VPNs letting you watch things in other countries like you are there. This was a true statement maybe five years ago that a lot of companies have cracked down on that and are adding many of those VPN servers to block lists.
    I honestly discovered this with my VPN when last year we stopped being able to watch the newest episodes of Bluey straight from Australia’s ABC network.

    • @threetrees313
      @threetrees313 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      PIA works. Stopped for a while but seems like they have it figured out now.

    • @tama47_
      @tama47_ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This is why you build your own vpn with dedicated ip, no chance of getting blocked.

    • @igelbofh
      @igelbofh 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's still true, though you need to do some tricks

    • @yazeedgamer5296
      @yazeedgamer5296 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@tama47_ How can you build your own VPN?

    • @dalepeters3841
      @dalepeters3841 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@threetrees313 I'm surprised. Back when I had PIA on by default, Netflix (before they cracked down on password sharing) kept emailing my friend about suspicious activity on his account and then threatened to ban his account because they finally asked him if a VPN was being used. I was even using US servers.

  • @RinaldoJonathan
    @RinaldoJonathan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    2:19 kinda surprised to see "Rumah Kawan" was mentioned there
    (it stands for "Friend's Home" in Indonesian)

    • @re57k
      @re57k 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Could also be malay, no?

    • @RinaldoJonathan
      @RinaldoJonathan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@re57k Indonesian and Malaysian language is very similar, but since I'm Indonesian, I couldn't confirm.
      But probably yes.

    • @ignusswart4290
      @ignusswart4290 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "Vriend se huis" is afrikaans for friends home. Its spoken in South africa and a Nice little detail in the video❤

    • @DrumsOFONEDESIGN
      @DrumsOFONEDESIGN 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And "Vriend se huis" is the same in Afrikaans 😂

  • @roddybrod
    @roddybrod 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    PIA literally just sent an email about increasing their price of the annual sub 9hours after this lol

  • @TheBondyboy
    @TheBondyboy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +101

    Mullvad - based in Sweden, where privacy laws are stronger than EU

    • @linuxares
      @linuxares 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      As a Swede, it's actually not stronger than EU. We have data logging laws for ISPs, but not VPN providers. This technically goes against EU law but Sweden said "We do it anyway!".
      Mullvad also proven themselves to have zero logs. Last year the Police wanted some info, they had none.

    • @nonsense1337
      @nonsense1337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      So we're not going to talk about when Swedish feds raided the Pirate Bay?

    • @linuxares
      @linuxares 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@nonsense1337 Oh god... that was such a massive f'up. Def some higher level sheez going down for that whole story.

    • @fujinshu
      @fujinshu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@linuxares They were threatened by the MPA(A) with trade reprisals (basically, they would give Sweden a bad reputation that would halt their trades with the rest of the world).

    • @EdilarinProducts
      @EdilarinProducts 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TheBondyboy strong privacy laws? You mean where our government gives out your personal information for anyone to look up?

  • @TheKingkrash
    @TheKingkrash 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +282

    It feels very scummy when TH-camrs say you can use it for Netflix, knowing that you can't. I think each and every TH-camr that tries to sell it has said that. And still do. KNOWING THAT YOU CAN'T!

    • @pedro4205
      @pedro4205 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      It used to work. The only time i payed for VPN was 10/11 years ago when i was using it to watch Netflix in the US server, since the Brazilian one had way less content. It is being years since it doesn't work with a simple VPN only, tho. But i don't know if every stream service ignores VPN for content availability now days.

    • @Hippaforalkus_
      @Hippaforalkus_ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      @TheKingkrash Tbf VPNs were never made for this. It's just youtubers and pretty much everyone uneducated about them who use VPNs as glorified proxies....

    • @KyleDavis328
      @KyleDavis328 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've used PIA for Netflix before, but it's hit and miss, and only sometimes works with some Netflix clients and certain servers. Again, it's not a silver bullet, and advertising it as such is pretty disingenuous, because even when it does work, it's not something that I would recommend to someone who isn't super tech literate and willing to tinker to get things working.

    • @romangiertych5198
      @romangiertych5198 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can use them for most services, to be fair. Even Netflix, until the recent "household lock". I have used Nord specifically many times for this exact purpose. Even now, Netflix is probably the only one that won't work.

    • @justicefool3942
      @justicefool3942 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      What do you mean you can't use a VPN for Netflix. I was using my Nord VPN for Netflix last night.

  • @c.s.7474
    @c.s.7474 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +254

    "Why I’ll be Taking VPN Sponsorships Again"
    The answer: money, it's always money.

    • @dyto2287
      @dyto2287 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      PIA is owned by the same company as ExpressVPN. He is definitely getting large sum to sponsor them instead the ones they compete with Nord who owns NordVPN, Surfshark and some others. These two big companies own majority of VPNs and they are so damn shady. Both have history of building analytic tools on user private data & anti-virus software that spies on your devices.
      Oh, and by the way, those audits are done by other companies they close relationship with since they have such a huge monopoly in this market. That's basically asking a friend - hey tell our customers we don't do this. And customers needs to believe it since there is no way to prove it. Only if hack happens then truth is revealed and then everything goes to shit. So since PIA have not been hacked yet, we don't know how much of it is true.

    • @baboonaiih
      @baboonaiih 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      And?

    • @tiloalo
      @tiloalo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@baboonaiihand it's selling their soul just for money, I'm sure they also hate the hell out of those shitty VPN selling tactics

    • @Savant_Ananya
      @Savant_Ananya 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@baboonaiih more money to buy another house.

    • @finanzam1
      @finanzam1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      You are watching the content for free ... They need to be paid by something

  • @MitsumaYT
    @MitsumaYT 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +94

    Honest question, that promise of "deleting your data from data brokers".
    Why would those kind of people actually do it, its not like they got that data legally in most cases.
    And what good do the few "legal" data brokers that actually have an opt out?

    • @mika2666
      @mika2666 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      Regulation like GDPR is the reason

    • @Mr.FastZombie
      @Mr.FastZombie 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Deleting your data is misleading. Most of these data brokers will re-add your information at some point, usually when new info is found. I've gone through all of mine manually and it seems impossible to Google me at this point, but after a year or two I did have to remove some more.
      As for the legality, in the US at least where DeleteMe mainly operates, these data brokers are aggregating data that is essentially public information. Our laws are archaic and definitely need to be modernized for the web.
      I don't really know why they even add an option to hide data. I don't think they are required to? I doubt it's out of the kindness of their hearts, because they don't have hearts.

    • @MitsumaYT
      @MitsumaYT 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mika2666 those kind of brokers shouldnt have your data in the first place most of the time. They care zero about legislation.
      Any my main question still stands, what about the majority of data brokers that are illegal, they wont do shit.

    • @renderedpixels4300
      @renderedpixels4300 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mika2666 Laws only affect these brokers if they get caught with their hand in the cookie jar. The data can be "deleted" from public view, but moved elsewhere for safe keeping. One can only hope that your data is actually removed.

    • @barnett25
      @barnett25 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Why do you think data brokers don't often get their data legally? At least in the US the data broker business is what most of the internet economy is built on.

  • @OnlyCORE
    @OnlyCORE 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +100

    3:50 Education: Questionable. I love whoever came up with it.

    • @retlocker98
      @retlocker98 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      The "about me" is also "Lorem ipsum", which is what programmers use, when you need some random text to test something out, but you don't want to write it yourself. Absolutely brilliant!

    • @JoshWebb
      @JoshWebb 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Given that Elijah is one of the LTT writers, and he seems (to me, but I don't claim to be a mind reader) to mostly enjoy playing into the memes about him, I'm going to guess that he wrote it himself.

    • @jamess4511
      @jamess4511 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@retlocker98 his occupation is also PPE Test Technician in reference to the helmets lol

  • @CoolJosh3k
    @CoolJosh3k 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    I wish they highlighted that a VPN is for privacy and NOT security.
    In fact you even should be aware that traffic using only the VPN provided encryption could be read and manipulated by said VPN provider.
    Bonus fact: your important data is probably already using end-to-end encryption, such as an online form using SSL.

    • @baboonaiih
      @baboonaiih 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Did you even watch the video?? Lmao

    • @CoolJosh3k
      @CoolJosh3k 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@baboonaiih He never highlighted this as a statement that was clear in a stand alone matter.

    • @thescandalchannel
      @thescandalchannel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      VPN is not even for privacy, this is exactly the point. Best it do, is hide your IP and unlock some regional content, well if you have a app on your device, your isp can't se what you are doing nothing more or less at least for most users.
      If you host your own VPN server you could connect from outside the network if you want, but this is a other Story.

  • @MichalBrat
    @MichalBrat 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +125

    I purchased a "lifetime" VPN license from Windscribe. I is going to expire in two years. Guess I`ll die then.

    • @Contradi
      @Contradi 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Same, but based on their email communications since then, I think they just don't have a "lifetime license" product per se and instead just auto-renew their longest term license. Mine has done that since I purchased it.

    • @MichalBrat
      @MichalBrat 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Contradi I think I have read somewhere that this was it, no more renewals. But maybe I will be pleasantly surprised by a company holding true to their word for once!

    • @celiskurtis
      @celiskurtis 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MichalBrat nah they should. I have purchased a lifetime subsription and it has been like that for me. Windscribe is one of the only vpns I trust

    • @AlsoAlaskanBeard
      @AlsoAlaskanBeard 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It renews for 10 years at the expiry date as long as your account is still active, assuming you have the lifetime pro. The lifetime limited accounts do have an expiry but it's TBD.

    • @Toramt
      @Toramt 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Same for PureVPN. 'Lifetime' was defined as '5 years'.

  • @Leo2000___
    @Leo2000___ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I really appreciated the nod to the Afrikaans language "Vriend se huis" - Friend's house @2:19

  • @dinkiethesink
    @dinkiethesink 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Delete me is a product of a VPN company and is partnered with most of them. Saying the video isn’t sponsored by one is disingenuous and considering u have writers on staff, there’s 0 chance they don’t know.
    Nicehash Moment.

  • @TheShortStory
    @TheShortStory 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +65

    Eh.. PIA has had sketchy sales tactics and just come across as a bit shady for my liking. I switched to protonvpn a year ago and have been very happy with it

    • @justicefool3942
      @justicefool3942 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Be careful with Proton, they will sometimes hand over emails and IP addresses at a foreign governments request. Shouldn't be a problem if you only use it for privacy, as it's not very common they will do so, but it is something to look out for.

    • @TheShortStory
      @TheShortStory 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@justicefool3942 where can I read about such instances? As far as I can tell ProtonMail has done it but ProtonVPN has an audited no-logs policy

    • @seldogrif9732
      @seldogrif9732 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@justicefool3942 I mean for most people the fact that they do not sell your data to other companies is more than enough, as keeping your data private does not mean that you are planning to do some illegal activities.
      Although with that being said, if I recall with Proton, if you are using Two-password mode, it should not matter if your data is handed over or not. As 2PM, works in a way where one password is for the mailbox and second is to de-crypt the data itself and Proton does not store second password anywhere. I will have a minor PTSD from 2017 when I forced to wipe my mailbox because I only had the second password written on my phone, which got destroyed, and there was no way to recover that second password.

    • @silikeite
      @silikeite 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Swiss laws on email vs VPN are different; so you're mostly in trouble for IP stuff only if you use ProtonMail without any VPN (doesn't have to be ProtonVPN but can be).
      And it's email subjects for encrypted emails (due to technical limitations with PGP) and complete unencrypted emails (well, they're available on the other side). Of course, this is still a problem, so just be aware of that and adjust your behavior accordingly.

    • @IdkG7
      @IdkG7 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Check who PIA is owned by too
      Mullvad on top though but isn’t a bad choice

  • @calingligore
    @calingligore 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +84

    Mullvad is completely anonymous

    • @jaimeFaithBasedOne
      @jaimeFaithBasedOne 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Mullvad all the way, they know nothing about me

    • @Cythil
      @Cythil 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Interesting. Because it literally means mole in Swedish.

    • @Savant_Ananya
      @Savant_Ananya 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@jaimeFaithBasedOne Mullvad best

    • @TheOchita
      @TheOchita 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is the way.
      Mullvad is goat

    • @NekoFever
      @NekoFever 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      To the point where you can mail them cash to pay for it. And you don’t have an account linked to you in any way - just a number to log in.

  • @Jellman86
    @Jellman86 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Would be good for ltt to talk about how vpns do not block fingerprinting (tracking) of your browser / computer.
    This is a big issue which means if you really want to download torrents et all, you need to use an automated service (like sonarr / prowlarr) on a different box to your pc.

  • @fredwalker7372
    @fredwalker7372 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +84

    So deleteme can delete data after I give them all of the data I want to delete?

    • @JooshLOL
      @JooshLOL 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      haha yeah

    • @Rekettyelovag
      @Rekettyelovag 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But how?

    • @avieshek
      @avieshek 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Rekettyelovag They are US Government's side project, if you're really from a shady place they either hire you or jail~

    • @xevilrabbit12
      @xevilrabbit12 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol

    • @Aloukat
      @Aloukat 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Rekettyelovagas I understand they have a script that crawls the databases of Databrokers as when they find your matching data they display them and for you and you can hit „delete“ and they contact the broker and let them delete your data.

  • @emil.steiner
    @emil.steiner 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    the encryption standard supported by the bittorrent protocol is based on RC4 which can be broken in several ways. One should only think of it as an additional cheese layer with many holes

    • @ezg8448
      @ezg8448 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      It's that little bit that helps, when there are billions of packets go through, common sense tells anyone to go after low hanging non-encrypted fruit.

    • @realcartoongirl
      @realcartoongirl 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      is like changing your ssh port to something random instead of using your default one. it wont help you in security but will significantly reduce amount of people knocking at your door

  • @chromakode
    @chromakode 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Most people don't need VPNs. Full stop. The only reason we're talking about them is because they pay TH-cam creators to manufacture demand.

    • @mden2490
      @mden2490 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That’s not entirely true as it does help in the reduction of targeted ads, fingerprinting etc, and hiding your isp and others not knowing where your are surfing . So if you care about your personal data and it not being sold then it’s worth it.

    • @chromakode
      @chromakode 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@mden2490 Masking IP address serves little practical improvement to privacy for most people, since they remain logged in to Google and social media accounts. Preventing fingerprinting is extremely hard. The privacy benefits of VPNs are oversold to consumers because it's profitable to VPN providers.

  • @lex_darlog_fun
    @lex_darlog_fun 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Every tech youtuber keeps saying a VPN is only one tool in your privacy toolkit... but noone elaborates what the entire toolkit is.
    How about making a series of videos about privacy and security?

    • @dosto233
      @dosto233 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      LTT has another video on this exact topic mentioned in this video. At a basic level you’ll need TOR as well as a privacy focused OS like Kali Linux running in a VM. Some of us go further with things like NextDNS, depending on your needs. It’s quite a rabbit hole to go down.

    • @marvnch
      @marvnch 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      they literally linked their video about the privacy toolkit in the outro...

    • @itskdog
      @itskdog 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@marvnch do you really expect people to watch the whole video before commenting? /s

    • @marvnch
      @marvnch 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@itskdog whoops, I thought too highly of yt comments...

  • @FlanylShirtman
    @FlanylShirtman 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    This video is not sponsored by our new sponsor who this video is basically a commercial for.

  • @modimihir
    @modimihir 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Endorsing PIA when you're offering an affiliate link is such a huge conflict of interest in so many ways.

  • @davk
    @davk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    How come after clicking your link I have a limited-time promotion of 1.99€/month and on incognito is only 1.79€?

  • @ericmedina3520
    @ericmedina3520 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    its interesting you make a video about not sponsoring shady VPN services and the sponsor of the video is a company that doesnt do what it claims.... DeleteMe hides your public data for as long as you are subscribed, it never really deletes your information and once you unsubscribe it comes back. That is a scam.

    • @Raul-pg1pf
      @Raul-pg1pf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Source?

    • @Firefin
      @Firefin 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      could be wrong, but I'm fairly sure that's because the data gets deleted but then brokers find more and sell that. hence, why its a subscription

    • @DieserAIiasIstSchonVergeben
      @DieserAIiasIstSchonVergeben 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, there is nothing that prevents the data brokers from just continuing to collect data once you (or rather delete me as your representative) stop asking them to stop doing that and stop asking them to get rid of your data

  • @SANTAtheGREY
    @SANTAtheGREY 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    what I'd actually like to know more about: What is it with the sudden influx of "We'll delete your data that has been stolen and protect you against phishing" type companies? It's as much of a flood as VPNs and squarespace at the start. It feels like this is just induced demand, and I'm not sure the services they're offering are even real/worth paying for?
    Could you do a video on that? 😅

  • @Zetharion1
    @Zetharion1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Most VPN's are blocked by content providers nowadays so trying to bypass regions blocks is more difficult.

    • @EnglishMike
      @EnglishMike 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Even private VPNs you set up yourself at datacenters owned by the likes of Linode and DigitalOcean are pretty useless for region spoofing too. It's also annoying to come across websites that you wouldn't think would worry about VPNs (like British Airways) blocking VPN hosts.
      The only sure way of being able to bypass the region blocks is to find a residential host, but the owners have to agree to put their account at risk of being terminated for contravening their terms of service.

    • @ka-md8ue
      @ka-md8ue 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Content creators? You mean TH-camrs? Or Netflix Hulu e t c?

    • @Zetharion1
      @Zetharion1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ka-md8ue I said providers as in Netflix, Prime Video, Paramount Plus etc.. not creators.

    • @DavidWhatfor
      @DavidWhatfor 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Cannot be bothered buying films online i.e. iTunes. Bought a few that disappeared even though I paid for them so I jus buy the DVD now as I am the kind of person who can watch a film more than once it does not bother me buying a DVD if I like the film.

  • @TheSykoRC
    @TheSykoRC 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    lol when linus mentioned "diplomatic immunity", I immidiatly remembered lethal weapon II.

    • @GreenLantern814
      @GreenLantern814 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Has just been revoked! 😁

  • @LouisianaNative13
    @LouisianaNative13 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As the owner of a dating website and app, I have observed that 99% of sign-ups originating from users utilizing VPNs and data center connections are associated with scam activities.

  • @skys12fu
    @skys12fu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    10:50 One Piece ?!

    • @soywarmon
      @soywarmon 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@skys12fu I saw this comment the moment Linus said it 😂

    • @ShaXCwalk
      @ShaXCwalk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      THE ONE PIECE IS REAL

  • @TheRogueBro
    @TheRogueBro 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    The amount of "fingerprints" you leave while using the internet makes it almost impossible for you to be completely anonymous these days. Even if you're using SSL, a VPN and even a fake account, Google Chrome (the most used browser) STILL knows it's you, and is still tracking you and your activities.

    • @31173
      @31173 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True for web browsing, but VPNs are useful for other protocols. For example torrent have hardly any fingerprints. You can enable "anonymous mode" in qBittorrent, which makes your client to send a generic peer-id. You can also bind qBt to the VPN adapter in order to avoid leaks. For me VPNs are very much useful.

    • @enginerd80
      @enginerd80 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What is it that is being fingerprinted, actually? What if you have two or more different browsers? Or what if you have two or more user accounts on your computer for different activities? Or if you have multiple computers? At what point would you be seen as two different users by websites?

    • @MostlyPennyCat
      @MostlyPennyCat 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      So, don't use Chrome.

    • @cristinelcostachescu9585
      @cristinelcostachescu9585 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@enginerd80behavioral analysis, the websites you visit, the topics you search for, and many more details which you can't hide in any way. If they want to pin you down, there are ways to do it. I'm not suggesting you become paranoid, just be aware of it.

    • @MrPir84free
      @MrPir84free 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@enginerd80 Everything that is possible with the current tech; your account on a website is linked with cookies and an email and often "names" given.. Browser profiles are one aspect, as is your associated internet IP address, down to the OS involved. Connect to that site from your phone or tablet, and your real info is now linked to that account too; it's all stored, and associated with.
      One would literally need to start over, with a mentality of intentionally not accessing such from a phone/tablet/windows /mac computer that is linked to your other accounts. If you are married, your spouse's account is already linked to you as well as any kids that live with you. The simplest approach would be to use a VPN within a Virtual Machine, built just for that purpose.. It becomes a problem later if and when one of your "alternate" accounts gets hacked; how do you recover it ? You won't want to tie it to a phone number, nor to another email address that more represents you.. You will run into the chicken before the egg scenario as well; how do you create a VPN account that is going to require an email; well, how do you create that email account without it be able to be associated with your other accounts ? ( Go to a local mcDonalds or other free wifi hotspots and create your email on a disposable phone or tablet that does not have a SIM card in it. )
      The problem as I see it is you can't really trust anything Microsoft / Google / Apple, including windows devices, android devices, apple devices, google browsers, etc.. The major downside to the VPN aspect is how trustworthy is the VPN you are choosing; is it truly no-logs ?; is it truly ram only ? After all, most VPN providers are tied to a credit card number or an email address, or something else; usually something in your name..

  • @logan_page
    @logan_page 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve been using PIA since you first partnered with them back then. Been very pleased with my own experience.

  • @michaeldancurtis
    @michaeldancurtis 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Next week the show will be about the scam that is privacy data removal

    • @staindk
      @staindk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yeah these services seem just as likely to be sketchy as vpns.

    • @DanClark_ddc
      @DanClark_ddc 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@staindk delete me will have a data breach in a few months and everyone will jump ship to some other such service just in time for another data breach.

  • @CuivTheLazyGeek
    @CuivTheLazyGeek 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    As a small TH-camr, having to decline the VPN sponsorship offers has been painful as they offer quite an incentive... But the right thing to do.

    • @Zidbits
      @Zidbits 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm not so sure LTT did it because "it was the right thing to do". Do you know why they dropped VPNs? Because of the public backlash. Do you know why they started up again? The backlash was gone and they like $$. LTT has been around long enough to know how this all plays out; First, someone does something bad. Second, someone calls them out on it. Third, crazy public backlash on social media. Fourth, people have short memories so the backlash has disappeared and been forgotten. Fifth, profit.

    • @Raizan-IO
      @Raizan-IO 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just take the money, specially if you are small. Disclose your real opinion about it though, if they do not let you then go to the next VPN sponsor that will. I don't uphold small youtubers to be paragons of ideals and justice, when the likes of LTT with bigger audience (and sadly credibility, even if not properly earnt anymore) will happily disregard integrity here and there... You are in it for business too, just drop them when you get big enough to get sponsors you are comfortable with or have a big enough reach that you are actually sure you will be affecting 10-100 users with your sponsorship. (Due to conversion rates I'm guessing you will need 100k viewers for that)

    • @Kenvie2000
      @Kenvie2000 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your integrity. Sometimes in life there are greater things than money.
      I have tried VPN services and they never truly worked (NordVPN for one) and they were unable to help me in getting it to work and wouldn't refund me the annual subscription I paid for (even though I had just purchased it). I then just gave up trying to make it work. They got $130+ from me and I received nothing from it. By taking money from people like this you are essentially taking money from people who get duped into using these services. Kind of an indirect crypto scam.

  • @PowerPointGaming
    @PowerPointGaming 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    honestly, advertise whatever you want, people should be smart enough to not trust the company that is using youtube as a way to build easy trust

  • @shinaikouka
    @shinaikouka 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    My biggest issue with VPN ad reads on TH-cam is the pushing for breaking geo-restricting content on streaming services. It always gives off this “they’re cheating you out of content!” vibe when in reality, the streaming service in your region simply doesn’t have a license. In the US, you’re likely going to see larger shows on their owner’s service, but the owner/distributor likely sold the foreign market rights to other companies who likely have no qualms licensing to someone else. It’s why Brooklyn Nine-Nine isn’t on Netflix US but it is on Netflix UK.

    • @qazxswedcxzaqws
      @qazxswedcxzaqws 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Trying to outbid your opponents with venture capital funding for licensing agreements while avoiding taxes and underpaying actors and screenwriters etc, is not exactly very ethical practice so why should the consumer be so concerned about circumventing these intentional barriers to watch a tv show? Much rather than watching it some 2 years later while still likely paying that same company monthly in the meantime?

    • @Hidyman
      @Hidyman 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually, Brooklyn Nine-Nine is on Netflix in the US.

    • @meneldal
      @meneldal 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      But they are cheating out in a way, the licensing shit means everyone ends up getting a shitty product and just makes sailing more attractive.

    • @bilateralrope8643
      @bilateralrope8643 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The other catch is that if the streaming service notices you're dodging the geo-restrictions, they might have other tools to use to keep the streaming platform in compliance with all the licensing agreements they have signed.
      Like flagging an account to only have access to content they stream globally, no matter which country it appears to be viewing them in.

    • @amdkillaplays
      @amdkillaplays 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I mean at one point I believe Netflix refused connections via known VPN IP addresses. They are more likely to enforce that again if the rights holders demanded Netlix tightens up their geo-restrictions otherwise threatening to self host their content instead. But given that a lot of rights holders-come-streaming services suffer from under development, they don't realise they are falling behind on their own product, let alone anyone elses

  • @fauzansafii5257
    @fauzansafii5257 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    2:05 Thank you Linus for including Rumah Kawan...😎

  • @CitrusThings
    @CitrusThings หลายเดือนก่อน

    PIA lost my trust when they wouldn't let me sign in for years and I couldn't cancel
    I lost a few hundred dollars for something I couldn't use. Eventually I realized they were pulling from my PayPal and I was able to dispute it

  • @kevinjuul1580
    @kevinjuul1580 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    What about Proton vpn instead of private internet access now when you mention Proton mall

    • @WackyConundrum
      @WackyConundrum 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What about it?

    • @kevinjuul1580
      @kevinjuul1580 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What I'm asking about is proton VPN not as good as private internet access

    • @dyto2287
      @dyto2287 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Proton doesn't pay as well for sponsorship that's it 😅

  • @TheBardsCorner
    @TheBardsCorner 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I’ve tried PIA for a month, but so many websites just weren’t loading simply because I was using it that it became impossible to do most ordinary things…
    No p2p, no strange things, just ordinary websites loading to blank screens (mostly on iOS/iPadOS, I should say).
    The macOS app would not work with iCloud Private Relay unless I used the OpenVPN app.
    If a connection couldn’t be made, the app would go into an endless cycle of trying to connect/disconnect until you force quit it.
    Definitely not a great experience, but it helped in the country I was travelling into to at least mitigate the data theft and exploit from hotel/public WiFi.

    • @any1alive
      @any1alive 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i agree, many sites have been filtered and know pia exit nodes, yet pia pretty much says reload they cant do anything. sanme with places like 4chan, if 1 person does soemthign bad all users on that exit node are, which is silly ith how big pia is, and certain gamesliek factorio had issues with pia active

  • @KaizCh_VODs
    @KaizCh_VODs 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ever since VPN ads stopped talking about "privacy" and started talking about how you could get lower prices in other countries and "UNLOCK" content from other regions. I stop watching those that advocate for them completely. it's absolutely disgusting that they can boast about these things when the ToS of some of those websites clearly states that if you try to VPN into their services you will be banned.

  • @PAPO1990
    @PAPO1990 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    depending on your use case for the VPN, you can also set up your own on your router at home. But speed can be a problem

  • @Xadethor
    @Xadethor 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    One major detail to add about PIA! It's owned by Kape Technologies PLC! While currently PIA might be working with integrity, that doesn't ensure that in the future they will do the same so stay informed about it if you use it.

    • @dyto2287
      @dyto2287 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They also own ExpressVPN now 🤣

    • @baboonaiih
      @baboonaiih 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They got bought 5 years ago didn't they? Your level of risk avoidance is unhealthy. They've operated fine for 5 years since being bought what makes you think THIS is the year they go rogue?

    • @Savant_Ananya
      @Savant_Ananya 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@baboonaiih how do you know they aren't rogue already and only using Deloitte audit as a safeguard.
      Why Linus never mentioned Kape in the video?

    • @Savant_Ananya
      @Savant_Ananya 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      For privacy the best Mullvad VPN or if you are a western person Kaspersky vpn

    • @baboonaiih
      @baboonaiih 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Savant_Ananya how do you know anyone else isn't gone rogue? Lol

  • @Simqer
    @Simqer 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I remember playing DotA over the internet using a free software that made a virtual LAN, because we were kids and no way would our parents buy us Warcraft 3 battle pass or whatever it was called.

  • @langelius
    @langelius 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    0:50 is that supposed to be uncensored?

    • @NicoleMay316
      @NicoleMay316 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      LMG doesn't recommend Nord, so why would they share an affiliate link not only for a service they don't recommend, but one from another channel?

    • @langelius
      @langelius 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@NicoleMay316 yeah, that's why i wrote this comment

  • @aj8__8
    @aj8__8 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    "this video is not sponsored by any VPN company"
    *talks about PIA for 4 minutes*

  • @feschber
    @feschber 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what infuriated me the most were the VPN adds claiming that anyone can see your banking information and everything if you dont use one...

  • @IbsenRogerGomesRego
    @IbsenRogerGomesRego 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    8:08 hehehe he said butt Linus

  • @thejoshpresle
    @thejoshpresle 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Mullvad crew stand up

  • @worldaviation4k
    @worldaviation4k 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    *I read that most don't even work when they head to the other country where they do really need one*

  • @thexgamer8240
    @thexgamer8240 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    You know a video is gonna get some controversy when it got unlisted.

    • @NicoleMay316
      @NicoleMay316 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      It's not unlisted tho? They just swapped it off unlisted to make it public, guess it flipped back or wasn't updating on TH-cam entirely, and now it's public again.

  • @anonymousminer7401
    @anonymousminer7401 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    I think bringing up proton's free tier for they're VPN would be a good thing to bring up since it's the only free tier of any VPN's that is actually usable with unlimited usage and up to 10gbps speeds but apart from that amazing video

    • @Unknown_Genius
      @Unknown_Genius 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lussor1 just questioned the same and checked - apparently they removed the bandwidth & monthly data limit. not sure if anyone could even make full use of it from the free servers tho.

    • @cyrex686
      @cyrex686 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's because they are a Honeypot

  • @oogba71
    @oogba71 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Linus, it's amazing you got through a whole video on VPNs without talking about law enforcement and safe jurisdictions. It probably escaped your mind because PIA -- the company you want to pump -- does not reside in a safe legal jurisdiction. PIA is owned by the UK-based company Kape Technologies, a company also famous for making toolbars with unwanted software (sterling credential for a security company). This is significant because the UK is one of the The Five Eyes, a security alliance of 5 countries that includes the US. PIA should not be considered by anyone who cares about their security and freedom of speech. Remember that in the UK and elsewhere, saying "hateful" words can land you in prison.

  • @sirtajgill4754
    @sirtajgill4754 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    9:08 wait, what? they let people use their servers without a subscription?

    • @tercmd
      @tercmd 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No. What Linus means is that their VPN does not require *_their app._* You still require credentials for that.

    • @sirtajgill4754
      @sirtajgill4754 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tercmd gotcha. mb

  • @CancermanPL
    @CancermanPL 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    As Benjamin Franklin famously said "in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and that Linus would sell his own mother for a sponsorship"

  • @TheCod3r
    @TheCod3r 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Forget these VPN companies. Rent a virtual server in an offshore location and set up your own VPN!

  • @chickenfried12
    @chickenfried12 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    Mullvad is awesome!

    • @31173
      @31173 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Mullvad is one of the best. Torrents still work without port forwarding, because their servers' NAT allows UDP hole punching. Just remember to enable μTP protocol and you are good to go.

    • @Unknown_Genius
      @Unknown_Genius 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@31173 specifically naming torrents despite peer 2 peer being no issue (that includes torrents) with most VPNs honestly makes your comment look more like a fake advert than anything else.

  • @Delicate141
    @Delicate141 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    6:37 what sketchy dude?!

    • @thatoneocto
      @thatoneocto 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Me

    • @internetconspiracy7525
      @internetconspiracy7525 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thatoneocto
      911 what your emergency?
      *I would like to report a sketch person*

  • @Mythical_crafter
    @Mythical_crafter 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    2:13
    What they actually used Afrikaans!!! ❤🎉😂
    I'm so impressed!!!
    "Friend se huis "

  • @CaffeinatedFrostbite
    @CaffeinatedFrostbite 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    no mention of mullvad?

    • @alexdavis9324
      @alexdavis9324 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Mullvad has a way better pricing structure imo

    • @spicy_mint
      @spicy_mint 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Mullvad is over 3x the cost and is missing port forwarding. The value proposition is far worse.

    • @renderedpixels4300
      @renderedpixels4300 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      PIA is cheaper in the long run (like $2-3/m for the longer plans) but they are extremely trustworthy

    • @Ohfwljvelvjw
      @Ohfwljvelvjw 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@alexdavis9324 Mullvads pricing structure is infinitely better than any other VPN providers. They should all do a flat rate charging system. These discount things are dumb, and they're just there to lock people in for an extended period of time. $11.99 usd a month for PIA? Robbery.

  • @overcunning
    @overcunning 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    A thing about VPN's is that the profit margins are incredible. They typically charge like what, 5 bucks a month? You'd be severely ripped off if you'd pay any more than that. But then, on the other hand, you can rent a bunch of dirt cheap virtual machines for

    • @handle32169
      @handle32169 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Interesting. Is it feasible as you say with unlimited traffic at gigabit speeds?

    • @arnox4554
      @arnox4554 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      American hosting is super cheap, yes. It's also super cheap because it's super easy for the US gov and courts to take control of that server. Even without your knowledge. Or they can just ask for it to be taken down and the host has to comply or else get legally nuked.
      You CAN get overseas hosting that avoids all of this, but the problem with that issssss... You guessed it. Cost. It's way more expensive because the demand is far higher due to the reasons I just discussed.

    • @JasonB808
      @JasonB808 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where can you rent virtual machine for under $20 per year? North Korea?
      Even the cheapest virtual machine on Azure is like $30 dollars per month.

    • @overcunning
      @overcunning 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@handle32169 No, definitely not. The slices I've got are mostly limited to 1 gig, 1TB/mo. Never hit those limits, though, even when at least two of us were streaming online videos all day long for an entire month using the same node. The hardest hitters were actually modern oversized AAA-titles, but it's uncommon to be downloading multiple every month either.
      Most people way overestimate their internet usage, though, that's the way entire internet works, it's oversold all the way from consumers to L1's and content providers.They have deals like "you get 100gbe link but you're only allowed to use 10gb of it 95% of the time", so you can have short bursts of full speed, but they are both betting that most of people won't. A true no-bullshit no-limit no-cut-speed link is something more like $100/mo, so if either ISP or VPN is advertising unlimited gig for less than that, they probably either have hidden limits or they just take the loss.
      If you really need a gigabit connection though, that you're expecting to saturate most of the time, then you should probably be looking into enterprise stuff like dedicated P2P(Point-to-point) connections. Consumer stuff comes with no guaranteed is always prone to be just cut off for whatever bullshit reason they can think of.

    • @overcunning
      @overcunning 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JasonB808 lowendbox/lowendstock. Big cloud is massively overpriced, look for small independent hosters instead.

  • @Kenosos
    @Kenosos 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's pretty simple, those VPN services are not and will never be a security or privacy tool, they are useful for changing geo-location to access different services, that's it.

  • @Nobody-vr5nl
    @Nobody-vr5nl 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    "No logs" is always a lie if it oporates within a country that REQUIRES logs by law.

    • @NicoleMay316
      @NicoleMay316 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Correct....and yet PIA has proven time and time again they don't keep logs despite US courts asking for them.
      So I think they're in the clear. Having all the data on volatile RAM is genius.

    • @KyleDavis328
      @KyleDavis328 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@NicoleMay316 Indeed, "whoops, power went off on the server that kept that information, guess it's lost for good"

    • @meneldal
      @meneldal 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@KyleDavis328 Or you can just reboot the server every day.

    • @Skiller71Studios
      @Skiller71Studios 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@NicoleMay316The US courts that you know of*

  • @zeppelinshy
    @zeppelinshy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    when I saw linus with *that crown* I thought he was going to say something very different for a second and was worried haha

  • @thegameczar
    @thegameczar 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I want to trust PIA, if it were not for the bait-n-switch pricing. The deal states, “2 Years + 5 Months FREE -- $1.96/mo”. In the fine print it states, “$56.94 first 29 months and yearly thereafter”.
    If I take $56.94 and divide by 24 (2 years of months) I get $2.37, not $1.96. But if I divide $56.94 by 29 I get $1.96. Either I am getting 5 free months or I am getting VPN for $1.96 a month. But I cannot be getting both.
    If PIA, or any VPN, would stop playing these games, I might trust them. Just say get VPN for $1.96 a month for the first 29 months, or say get VPN for $2.37 a month for the first 2 years and get 5 free months.

  • @bonanzabrandon6877
    @bonanzabrandon6877 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Why I'll be taking VPN sponsorships again: money.

  • @00asdf24
    @00asdf24 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    my main problem with vpns is that they advertise to hide your traffic from adversarys like your isp or gov agencies, but all you do when using a vpn is giving your data to the vpn provider instead of your isp. the government can just go to vpn provider instead of the isp and get the data anyway

    • @wilh3lmmusic
      @wilh3lmmusic 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You need a VPN with a reliable no-logs policy such as Mullvad. When Swedish police went after Mullvad to get some user data they didn't have any data to give them due to not keeping logs.

  • @senseofpermanence
    @senseofpermanence 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love PIA but had to switch to Proton because it conflicts with MalwareBytes, but if that is resolved I will happily go back to PIA.

  • @Mikurusenpai
    @Mikurusenpai 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    "we are taking vpn sponsorships again because they pay too much to be ignored and you just have to trust me bro in picking the right one because we at least want to show that we are ethical"

    • @michaelcorcoran8768
      @michaelcorcoran8768 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sounds about right. And they announced it a few days after they whitewashed their own harassment scandal by hiring an obviously conflicted third party auditor. Now the whole community is harassing Madison on Twitter. People genuinely make me upset. Worship some. Anti-union guy with maybe 100 million. And you won't even support unionization with his own staff. Doesn't want them to talk about their wages much

  • @rchan9290
    @rchan9290 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    LTT is like watching WAN show ideas and discussions become a 15 ± min video

  • @rustlebruxz0013
    @rustlebruxz0013 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks!

  • @PeaceLoveAndGuns
    @PeaceLoveAndGuns 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Why I'll be taking VPN sponsorships again...💰💰💰💰

  • @tomascaetano5011
    @tomascaetano5011 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Pro tip.. i use my own openvpn server with dynamic dns...
    So when im in another country i can access my files and also download stuff as if i were in my house.. here is legal to download piracy as long as you dont sell it

    • @manyamaggot
      @manyamaggot 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I do that with tailscale without exposing my whole network

    • @DelightfulWalrus
      @DelightfulWalrus 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah but don't you worry about all those sketchy places knowing your ip address?

    • @KyleDavis328
      @KyleDavis328 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DelightfulWalrus The DDNS mentioned suggests they don't have a static IP, the ISP will re-lease a new IP before anyone can do anything with that information.

    • @Retromags_Brian
      @Retromags_Brian 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thumbs up for the GamePro magazine reference!

  • @AtteFi
    @AtteFi 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Only two videos ago you criticized "speed up" tools for sketchy marketing practices, and now you're taking VPN sponsorships? What?

  • @whitehawk45
    @whitehawk45 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This feels well meant, but it really just felt like one big ad for 2 different companies; one official sponsor and one unofficial sponsor.