Should All US Students Learn the Same Thing?

This is the VOA Special English Education Report, from voaspecialenglish.com | / voalearningenglish
More than forty of the fifty American states have approved what are known as the common core state standards. These are lists of content that students are supposed to learn at each grade level from kindergarten to high school. State governors and schools chiefs led the effort to develop the standards. The project involved teachers, administrators, experts and public comments. The final standards were released in June of twenty-ten. Acceptance is voluntary. But acceptance helped states that entered President Obama's four-billion-dollar "Race to the Top" competition for school reform.The standards are for English language arts and math. Supporters say these provide clear goals to prepare students to succeed in college and in jobs. But critics of national standards say the idea goes against one of America's oldest traditions -- local control of education. Political conservatives generally oppose federal intervention in schools. Yet it was a Republican president, George W. Bush, who expanded testing requirements to show that public schools are making yearly progress. Still, opponents of national standards call them "one-size-fits-all." They say the idea does not make sense for a country as large and diverse as the United States. One of those opponents is Bill Evers at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University in California. He was an assistant education secretary under President Bush. Mr. Evers warns about "closing the door on innovation by locking in a national, uniform bureaucratic system." He says, "The states don't have a problem in setting their curriculum -- they've been doing it ever since there've been public schools."Richard Riley was education secretary to President Bill Clinton, a Democrat. Mr. Riley says: "Conservatives would be concerned if we had federal-mandated common core standards. That's not what we have. It's a state-driven measure. High standards, challenging work for young people across the country." Mr. Riley says in the nineteen nineties he pushed states to develop their own statewide standards. But some of those standards were not very strong, he says, so he believes national standards are needed. But Bill Evers says technology now makes it easier to develop individual learning plans for students. He says schools should worry less about a common curriculum and more about improving teacher quality. For VOA Special English, I'm Alex Villarreal. You can find a link to the common core standards at voaspecialenglish.com.
(Adapted from a radio program broadcast 09Jun2011)

[@MinhLi-vg9se]

I support this idea because it creates a common standard to make base for all of universities and colleges admission their students. If we have not a common standard like that, we will face to many difficulties to classify students !

[@lieuphamthi4252]

Nice

[@GloballyUnited4Edu]

screw "race to the top". competition and education don't fit.
education is about the emancipation of the individual and society as a whole. it is not about training or producing human capital for the labor market.
nobody should tell others what they have to learn except maybe for the very basics such as reading, writing and basic maths.