I regularly tell this to my subscribers: "When you are walking and working in a rhythmic leadership mode, you have clearer thinking and a sharpened mindset that ignites your purpose, passion, and priorities."
Laissez-Fair leadership is the best, because it creates confidence and trust. No one wants to be followed and told what to do all the time. Look at three educational levels I.e. Primary,Secondary and Tertiary. At Tertiary level learners enjoy the 'let them do it alone' free style,which is like the laissez-fair leadership.People want to be trusted and depended upon and this doesn't take away the managers' authority in any way.
If a leader is unable to lead or don't want to lead, then better get the hell out of that place and allow someone else to do the job , who knows how to do the job.
A good leader is neither overbearing (which is based on extreme masculine control tendencies) nor absent/laissez-faire (which is based on extreme masculine overly risk tolerant tendencies) but rather the best leader is nurturing and attentive to the differing stages of each team members' current stage of growth and future potential (which is a more feminine trait)
The style is an absolute horrendous style, whenever the subordinates are learning their job. It sets up the new person for failure, and whenever the leader does not take an interest in the growth of the subordinate, even if that subordinate is intelligent, and has the ability to learn.
You’ve added to this style the inability to coach or train. That’s not true. I’ve had several leaders with this style and they have been great trainers, provided I was ready to do the work without them pushing me.
I have a mix of democratic and laissez-faire style, but so far, it seems to not work too well. Since I observe that most people prefer strict guidance on what to do and when to do something.
You can make a hybrid of this and autocratic. Be a reasonable dictator that acts as a Lassier, step in brutally when they managers go out of line.... Or if there's no order... Let your managers be democratic and supervise it... Be a dictator - democratic - lazy
So the actual style that one talks about here is massive light control across the board... the most seduction control to the universe, also the most persuasive.
So it will work well for people who are high in conscientiousness and highly skilled. If your workers are low in conscientiousness, you'll probably fail.
That's what the research shows. If followers are highly competent and highly motivated, then it works well. If followers have low skill levels and low motivation, these leadership style is not a good approach to get results.
This style is effective tho iam a president in my class and i act stupid and always ask what to do and then iam surprised my co officers already doing it and doing it well 😆😂
If the lower paid person is coming up with all the solutions, perhaps they should be promoted and the laissez-faire leader demoted or better yet fired
Never complain about a boss being too controlling again.
I regularly tell this to my subscribers: "When you are walking and working in a rhythmic leadership mode, you have clearer thinking and a sharpened mindset that ignites your purpose, passion, and priorities."
This video was very beneficial for a research paper in my “Leadership in the Profession” class, thank you!!
You are so welcome!
This is a very informative video indeed 👏 👍
Laissez-Fair leadership is the best, because it creates confidence and trust. No one wants to be followed and told what to do all the time. Look at three educational levels I.e. Primary,Secondary and Tertiary. At Tertiary level learners enjoy the 'let them do it alone' free style,which is like the laissez-fair leadership.People want to be trusted and depended upon and this doesn't take away the managers' authority in any way.
Great examples. That's a good one.
If a leader is unable to lead or don't want to lead, then better get the hell out of that place and allow someone else to do the job , who knows how to do the job.
My boss is one, and she is awesome. This describes her well.
You are very fortunate.
This was very clear and helpful, thank you!
Glad it was helpful!
Very nice video.
Thanks. Would you please advise a model for laissez fair?
Well Done, Sir.
Hands Down,
🇵🇭 ❤️
A good leader is neither overbearing (which is based on extreme masculine control tendencies) nor absent/laissez-faire (which is based on extreme masculine overly risk tolerant tendencies) but rather the best leader is nurturing and attentive to the differing stages of each team members' current stage of growth and future potential (which is a more feminine trait)
Thank you
The style is an absolute horrendous style, whenever the subordinates are learning their job. It sets up the new person for failure, and whenever the leader does not take an interest in the growth of the subordinate, even if that subordinate is intelligent, and has the ability to learn.
You’ve added to this style the inability to coach or train. That’s not true. I’ve had several leaders with this style and they have been great trainers, provided I was ready to do the work without them pushing me.
Thanks this is a great learning tool
Glad it was helpful!
The Lazy Fairy economics theorem. That got a mention in school. It was either in economics or modern history. Cannot remember which.
Mr Lyon, I request you to kindly do a series on functions of management.
Good idea.
Thanks a lot
I have a mix of democratic and laissez-faire style, but so far, it seems to not work too well. Since I observe that most people prefer strict guidance on what to do and when to do something.
I will ad Commissioner Gordon as a Laissez-Faire leader to Batman.
Good example. I can see that in his character. Good one, George.
This was helpful. I have exams tomorrow and i don’t want to go through the pdfs
I hope to have a boss that practices this
U are so brilliant is that on your traits🖐
Hm. I'm more of a really hard worker rather than brilliant but I appreciate the compliment.
You can make a hybrid of this and autocratic.
Be a reasonable dictator that acts as a Lassier, step in brutally when they managers go out of line.... Or if there's no order... Let your managers be democratic and supervise it...
Be a dictator - democratic - lazy
So the solution to leadership is not to leadership...
Bioshock. A cautionary tale of the pitfalls of unrestrained capitalism and the drug of futurism
I think this style work best when you seek out to hire people that function at a high professional level.
So the actual style that one talks about here is massive light control across the board... the most seduction control to the universe, also the most persuasive.
So it will work well for people who are high in conscientiousness and highly skilled. If your workers are low in conscientiousness, you'll probably fail.
That's what the research shows. If followers are highly competent and highly motivated, then it works well. If followers have low skill levels and low motivation, these leadership style is not a good approach to get results.
This style is effective tho iam a president in my class and i act stupid and always ask what to do and then iam surprised my co officers already doing it and doing it well 😆😂
Thanks a lot sr🤍
lil Wayne runs young money with a laissez faire attitude
Yeah , feel like god not being available 😅
Sounds like Christ lol
Anyone with a link to Kurt Lewin's article (free if possible) thanks