This sounds well and good, but there are two fundamental issues here. 1. Both wokism and liberalism are the ideological descendants of protestant Christianity. The worldview where the oppressed are the virtuous ones is the one professed by both Christianity and wokism. With Christianity as the moral foundation, there is nothing to say that both liberalism and wokism will not see continuous resurgences. 2. In order to maintain an advanced civilisation, it is require that the people that partake in said civilisation have the cognitive capacity to understand and maintain it. This would exclude most of the people from the world, including a multitude of Christians.
To be fair progressivism, it has been argued, stemmed from reform protestantism, it is heretical to orthodox protestantism and other sects of Christianity.
Thanks very much for uploading this, I’m hoping for more in the future. A very good read/listen, but I must say that I disagree with the contention at about 5:57.
I would definitely suggest taking a high level unbiased look into the reality of Christianity as it is probably the most propagandized subject of the last century or so.
Europeans have been Christians for over 1000 years at this point. You can't simply sever that anymore than Christianity could've severed the pagan aspects of european culture over 1000 years ago
As Oswald Spengler said there is either Jesus or Pilate, the realm of truth or the actual and that these two are irreconcilable. If you choose Christianity your kingdom is not of this world, and thus this Christian nationalism is nothing but cope and if you choose Pilate, you will not have the truth or religiosity, but you will have the earthly world.
@@WarInHeavenA terrible misreading of Spengler. He suggests that each represents to him a take on truth, and that for late civilization it was not even a choice. Skepticism is the default.
I smell containment
I don't see many people interested today in a 'winners gonna win' mentality. I guess this will only be for a handful of rich guys.
A new founding for who exactly?
The Overman
You know who. 😉
He explains in the letter: Christians
@@Abbale As in, "No, he's not talking about christians" or "No, I dont want a new founding for christians" ?
@@Paul-A01 Not Christian’s.
This sounds well and good, but there are two fundamental issues here.
1. Both wokism and liberalism are the ideological descendants of protestant Christianity. The worldview where the oppressed are the virtuous ones is the one professed by both Christianity and wokism. With Christianity as the moral foundation, there is nothing to say that both liberalism and wokism will not see continuous resurgences.
2. In order to maintain an advanced civilisation, it is require that the people that partake in said civilisation have the cognitive capacity to understand and maintain it. This would exclude most of the people from the world, including a multitude of Christians.
1. Retvrn to Orthodoxy & Catholicism
2. Demographic concerns should be fully considered
To be fair progressivism, it has been argued, stemmed from reform protestantism, it is heretical to orthodox protestantism and other sects of Christianity.
Weaker sauce than I would've hoped for in this channel's comments.
Thanks very much for uploading this, I’m hoping for more in the future. A very good read/listen, but I must say that I disagree with the contention at about 5:57.
Sound not perfect is not wrong
I would definitely suggest taking a high level unbiased look into the reality of Christianity as it is probably the most propagandized subject of the last century or so.
Comparing musk buying twitter with feudal lord…
It was a good comparison 👌
Christianity is not the answer.
Europeans have been Christians for over 1000 years at this point. You can't simply sever that anymore than Christianity could've severed the pagan aspects of european culture over 1000 years ago
As Oswald Spengler said there is either Jesus or Pilate, the realm of truth or the actual and that these two are irreconcilable. If you choose Christianity your kingdom is not of this world, and thus this Christian nationalism is nothing but cope and if you choose Pilate, you will not have the truth or religiosity, but you will have the earthly world.
@@WarInHeavenChristianity is not the only religion.
@@WarInHeavenA terrible misreading of Spengler. He suggests that each represents to him a take on truth, and that for late civilization it was not even a choice. Skepticism is the default.
@@JC-qh6wl I am pretty much quoting him exactly he says Rome was the world of the actual and Jesus the world of truth, word for word