Accelerator Science: Why RF?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ธ.ค. 2016
  • Particle accelerators can fire beams of subatomic particles at near the speed of light. The accelerating force is generated using radio frequency technology and a whole lot of interesting features. In this video, Fermilab’s Dr. Don Lincoln explains how it all works.
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 110

  • @BiswajitBhattacharjee-up8vv
    @BiswajitBhattacharjee-up8vv หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a experimental module .Doping with RF.
    Fermilab is the heart and soul of physics at high standard .Each and every laboratory is world Bank of experience and physics and friction.
    Many people have their's own .
    A lesson I have learnt in electron spectroscopy.

  • @vothaison
    @vothaison 5 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    "We call these groups of particle .. a bunch" 🤔
    Meanwhile Apple calls its LCD "Liquid Retina".

  • @antonypalmer2815
    @antonypalmer2815 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank you for such a clear explanation. I work on a particle accelerator and your explanation will really help me explain to others how our system works.

  • @SahinKupusoglu
    @SahinKupusoglu 7 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Dr. Don Lincoln rocks! 11!!!

    • @eidolor
      @eidolor 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Lincoln
      He’s actually pretty well respected, that’s part of the reason why they have him as the face of these

  • @maxvalsaez
    @maxvalsaez 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    man particle physics is really awesome

  • @h7opolo
    @h7opolo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It's a scintillating intro into a fascinating exploitation of physics.

    • @qwertyca
      @qwertyca 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I see what you did there...

  • @mezzoedbey3802
    @mezzoedbey3802 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As an Electrical and Electronics engineering student, I'm very fascinated by your videos. Well done Fermilab especially yo Dr. Don Lincoln.

  • @apurbabiswas7218
    @apurbabiswas7218 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Great video. Lots of information delivered perfectly. Helpful animations too. Thanks Fermilab

  • @shadow404atl
    @shadow404atl 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Another great video. Very intuitive presentation. Thank you!

  • @ddorman365
    @ddorman365 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you for the great work you are all doing,Doug.

  • @constpegasus
    @constpegasus 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really enjoy these videos Mr Lincoln. Please keep them coming. Thank you sir.

  • @ravenous9577
    @ravenous9577 7 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Love this channel and content!

  • @Stilllife1999
    @Stilllife1999 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great explanation. This channel needs more exposure.

  • @JeffOrford
    @JeffOrford 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks so much for this, I found this vid to be really illustrative and enlightening for me.

  • @cosmosgato
    @cosmosgato 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    No one make physics more accessible then Dr. Don Lincoln.
    This guy is one of the greatest teacher ever.

  • @GottfriedLeibnizYT
    @GottfriedLeibnizYT 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Wow.
    I'm an electrical engineer and that amuses me.

  • @Milm4n0
    @Milm4n0 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice surfing man, great video!
    Thanks, keep em coming.

  • @IndraRiogersa
    @IndraRiogersa 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The explanations very helpful to tell non scientist friends of mine. Thank you !!

  • @photosinensis
    @photosinensis 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Oh, the amazing things you can do with RF. I love RF. It's my favorite part of the EM spectrum.

  • @Bhaumikpk
    @Bhaumikpk ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation. Very useful for understanding. Sir, many thanks.

  • @420MusicFiend
    @420MusicFiend 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another great video from Dr. Don Gotta love the Spinal Tap shout out lol

  • @6aston6ames
    @6aston6ames 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for this awesome videos, they make easy what we know than is dificult. But make us to loose the fear to this things.

  • @millamulisha
    @millamulisha 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Should talk a bit about the how the uncertainty principle comes into play when you need to time the RF field in just the right way so that particles are in a well defined position (but consequently ill-defined velocity) at the top of the RF 'arch' so to speak. Good video, thanks!

  • @sunshineo23
    @sunshineo23 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Awesome video!

  • @johnchristian5027
    @johnchristian5027 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice video guys, you should do more content!

  • @tomtommyl805
    @tomtommyl805 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You guys are great. !thanks

  • @tresajessygeorge210
    @tresajessygeorge210 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU... PROFESSOR LINCOLN...!!!

  • @EclipZeMuzik
    @EclipZeMuzik 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    wonderful work!!

  • @alamgirkabir7177
    @alamgirkabir7177 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good job Dr L

  • @dexio85
    @dexio85 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hey! Thanks for all the videos so far, this is very interesting stuff. I have a questions if you don't mind. Since the bunch gets accelerated more and more and does this mean that you need to control the phase angles of the RF waves injected into the cavities as the bunch loops around to always allow for this perfect scenario? Also. how big (physically) are the typical cavities and what is the typical frequency of the RF waves. Cheers.

    • @ganjanaut6038
      @ganjanaut6038 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      +ScienceNinjaDude What does that have to do with readings from frequency? You'd still get a data feed from the loop, if I have a timer running for a car going a lap it wouldn't matter if I used seconds or milliseconds, the loop feed would just be fractioned data when momentum increases.

  • @thomasqsa
    @thomasqsa 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is there a way to use a kind of "full bridge rectifier" in order to have the eletric fields only in the desired direction ? I mean, maybe there is no semiconductor that would be suitable for this use, but it would be pretty cool if there was something like this.

  • @joncrabb5926
    @joncrabb5926 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a cousin working on using terahertz frequencies for electron acceleration to work for smaller and more accurate bunches so that industries can be more accurate with the amount of electrons colliding. Found it fascinating so came to this vid.

  • @DicerX
    @DicerX 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please upload or upscale to 4K. Would honestly love this, youtube's compression makes video's look extremely terrible. Thank you for ally our efforts Doc.

  • @harryandruschak2843
    @harryandruschak2843 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fascinating!

  • @Dinlitla
    @Dinlitla 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    OK...that was cool! Thanks!

  • @Doping1234
    @Doping1234 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So in stable bunches the beam is compressed in the direction of travel. Doesn't this increase the charge density broadening the beam? How is this handled?

  • @guitarans
    @guitarans 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome videos... Thanks.. whats the name og the song at the end?

  • @romanieo
    @romanieo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great job as always Don. I just got back from CERN, I spent a couple of days visiting ATLAS, CMS and CCC. While there, they were running lead ions in the LHC. Hopefully your next video could explain how protons (hydrogen ions) gain mass when accelerated (if you haven't already made a video on this topic.) I never knew how integral RF was to particle acceleration.

    • @romanieo
      @romanieo 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks @ScienceNinjaDude. Can you explain your statement, "That relativistic mass thing is one of the more pernicious sillinesses that have crept into our culture."? Or point me to a video or paper that better breaks it down.

    • @oysteinsoreide4323
      @oysteinsoreide4323 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      romanieo This channel has videos explaining why mass doesn't change. You can search for it.

    • @oysteinsoreide4323
      @oysteinsoreide4323 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/LTJauaefTZM/w-d-xo.html

  • @jpruzc
    @jpruzc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a question, and I hate to ask it here but I can't seem to find the answer. I understand how standing EM waves are created inside the cavity and this is the oscillating electric field that accelerates particles. What I don't understand is the geometry of how these standing waves are created in such a way that the E field points in the direction of the particle's motion. I imagine the standing waves being created in the longitudinal axis (along the length of the cavities), but in this case, the E field would be oscillating vertically and not horizontally. Can somebody please explain? Thanks!

  • @TheyCallMeNewb
    @TheyCallMeNewb 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whoa! That must be extraordinarily, exasperatingly, interminably challenging; finding the right field timing. Surf's up.

  • @alanmarston8612
    @alanmarston8612 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice. Standard RF power curve.

  • @RME76048
    @RME76048 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    So (budget and space permitting), could a number of accelerators be shifted out of phase relative to each other such that when you wish to have the particles strike a target, they would be combined into a continuous beam as opposed to a single accelerator providing bunches of particles with gaps between?

  • @johnedwards1685
    @johnedwards1685 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A big coupled-cavity travelling wave tube. Like a radar amplifier valve except absolutely gigantic.

  • @arashm.1556
    @arashm.1556 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    FANTASTIC

  • @MrGooglevideoviewer
    @MrGooglevideoviewer 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are awesome! Thank you for the great video :)

  • @LowellBoggs
    @LowellBoggs 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Resonance is used to speed up particles. Could it be used to amplify gravitational waves? For example, amplifying the miniscule waves generated by wiggling atoms into macroscopic -- and presumably useful values?

  • @PartVIII
    @PartVIII 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    So cheesy. So informative. I can't get enough Dr. Don

  • @TheElectra5000
    @TheElectra5000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The deeply obscure and complicated technical term "bunch".

  • @mitzvahgolem8366
    @mitzvahgolem8366 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like period of vibration? Or period of oscillation of the RF field? Can a RF field be boosted by another RF field behind it essentially doubling the push ? שלום

  • @hotdrippyglass
    @hotdrippyglass 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love the shirt !!!!

  • @husseinmoussa-sd5es
    @husseinmoussa-sd5es 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello, Dr. Can you make a video to explain crab cavity ?

  • @Frankyjones1000
    @Frankyjones1000 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good ole surf on Michigan lake in december!

  • @marklandgraf7667
    @marklandgraf7667 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How long does it typically take to accelerate a particle to speed?
    How long does it typically stay in the beam before being collided?

    • @marklandgraf7667
      @marklandgraf7667 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Questions answered in "Accelerator Science: Circular vs. Linear"

  • @WilliamLeeSims
    @WilliamLeeSims 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Particle accelerators are dangerous! When you imagined surfing, your shirt changed. Thank goodness we have level-headed physicists working there.

  • @SimonSozzi7258
    @SimonSozzi7258 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So is the particle gun shooting like a strobe?

  • @nanak3363
    @nanak3363 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WOW !

  • @akashdas-pp3ko
    @akashdas-pp3ko 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    is it klystron with velocity modulation ?

    • @johnnycash4034
      @johnnycash4034 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Even klystrons have variable frequency. I think these just have a very broadband due to the size.

  • @brilwiljeff
    @brilwiljeff 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm looking for the video that explains how a torrent of photons create the appearance of a coherent wave.

  • @WDIO-RADIO
    @WDIO-RADIO 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice.

  • @juffowuppy
    @juffowuppy 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    radical!

  • @CaptainManic2010
    @CaptainManic2010 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    just blows my mind that a bunch of wankers got together and worked this all out. It's unbelievable. The thousands of minds and hours that went into getting the large accelerators to work....and the fact that they do...is awesome.
    Thanks so much for your time Don. You explained it so well to the layman.

  • @advance_sci_tech_SK_IITBombay
    @advance_sci_tech_SK_IITBombay 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is TM01 type of cavity. Cavity can have different modes but we prefer TM01.

  • @japhetozogbuda725
    @japhetozogbuda725 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    does this mean that radio signals can be made stronger using particle accelerator?

    • @johnnycash4034
      @johnnycash4034 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Three years later. Yes. It's called a klystron.

  • @gabetower
    @gabetower 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Tubular!

  • @sunshineo23
    @sunshineo23 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I wish I could double like it

  • @taufanaugusta8884
    @taufanaugusta8884 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So this is the reason we can have 2 particles moves in different direction within 1 circular collider.
    Those RF dictate, "you accelerate to the right, and you the left, let me know if you guys meet each other"

  • @betaneptune
    @betaneptune 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How can a particle bunch have not a single charge in it? Aren't we accelerating charged particles? How would you even accelerate a neutral particle?

    • @negiamerica
      @negiamerica 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think he meant that the bunch does not contain one charged particle but many charged particles

  • @rickb6029
    @rickb6029 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it's dangerous to surf into an oncoming wave... you become the fixed target.

  • @1Reevee
    @1Reevee 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would a spark really form in a vacuum?

    • @johnklapp9077
      @johnklapp9077 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      There aren't perfect vacuums ... the protons of the beam, for example.

  • @betaneptune
    @betaneptune 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did I hear you right? Bunches don't contain a single charge particle? If there's no charge, how can an electric field accelerate it?

    • @negiamerica
      @negiamerica 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think he meant that they do not contain one charged particle but many charged particles.

  • @nasalimbu3078
    @nasalimbu3078 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Platinum shrin
    Beam accelerator ray thylimil Ti give power to sun on metal

  • @EdgarSoaresPT
    @EdgarSoaresPT 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Hopefully no excuse is required for that Hawaiian shirt.

  • @jonathanjackson7047
    @jonathanjackson7047 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is not the reason we use RF to accelerate particles. There is some advantage to resonance when using a standing wave cavity. But there are many disadvantages of using RF.. energy spread of the particles, duty factor, heating and resonance matching etc. We would prefer to use DC voltages if we could. The problem with DC is arcing. This limits DC voltages and its something like 10kV per cm. Consequently, our accelerating gradient maximum is something like 1 MeV/m. THe largest van der graaf is 7MeV and is quite big. RF cavities can achieve much higher gradients on the order of 10's of MeV/m. This was the motivation to move from VanDerGraf type accelerators to RF cavities.

  • @betaneptune
    @betaneptune 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why are you suring into the big wave? You should be riding it, moving in the same direction as it.

  • @osvaldoferreira7136
    @osvaldoferreira7136 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to translate some of the videos to my birth language, portuguese. I would love to share this materials with my friends, but they don't speak english... Why don't you guys allow translations?

    • @TheUSCMS
      @TheUSCMS 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Osvaldo Ferreira I think they do.

    • @osvaldoferreira7136
      @osvaldoferreira7136 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, they dont. Go in settings/subtitles, there are no option to add new subs.

  • @robertlunsford1350
    @robertlunsford1350 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very similar to how our accelerators work for radiation therapy.

  • @gorkemvids4839
    @gorkemvids4839 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Surfing on em wave huh? Pretty sure its cooler than water surfers

  • @YCCCm7
    @YCCCm7 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why not just make 10 louder?

    • @Fury6
      @Fury6 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      ...but this one goes to 11.

    • @eidolor
      @eidolor 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It doesn’t count until it’s over 9000 and shatters strong force

  • @ahmedomar6806
    @ahmedomar6806 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    😭😭

  • @AnhThu-jh6ih
    @AnhThu-jh6ih 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lp

  • @GEOindustries0
    @GEOindustries0 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "None more black"

  • @yourstruely9896
    @yourstruely9896 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    A group of particle physicist a bunch

  • @PrivateSi
    @PrivateSi 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sounds like the world's messiest experiment using the worlds most precise equipment and understanding of physics.. They smash so many particles together so quickly at such close range due to this bunching I'm not convinced of (all of) the experiment results.

  • @StainedShuriken333
    @StainedShuriken333 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are approached by a frenzied Vault scientist, who yells, "I'm going to put my quantum harmonizer in your photonic resonation chamber!" What's your response?

  • @zaiks0105
    @zaiks0105 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still don't get it ... at least I am honest ;)

  • @daveb5041
    @daveb5041 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    11 exists in professional sports too. In an interview with the new england patriot's running back on how he scored the super bowl winning touchdown he explains that he gave it 110%. The next year when they lost the superbowl the same player gave reasons why they lost but he never said he gave it 110%. I actually made up that story because I couldn't name any of the players but watch any sports interview ever and the winning team/player will always say how they gave it 110% but only when they won. Whats the real reason? If there is one the players certainly don't know.

  • @whirledpeas3477
    @whirledpeas3477 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Particle physics is worth a video or 2, please explain why it is worth more 🤔. Idiots please reply

  • @foxlinx
    @foxlinx 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The only part that gave me hope was when these guy said that the cavities "prefer". I hope they leave old and stupid dogmas like fields... gl

  • @ruby_gleyzes
    @ruby_gleyzes 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video!

  • @rickb6029
    @rickb6029 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it's dangerous to surf into an oncoming wave... you become the fixed target.