Smash that Subscribe button! My answer for today's question: Let me rephrase my original question so that I can provide a better answer: 'Should governments give everyone free **anything**?', and my answer will always be a big NO. Ask yourself, how exactly can a government be capable of giving anyone anything free? When you ask the government to give you free products or services (health care, education, internet..), they have to steal the money from their productive population in the form of taxation. It's never truly free; someone has to pay for it. With that said, your hands aren't exactly clean if you show up at the voting box and vote for free stuff. At the very least, indirectly, you're asking the government to act as your personal enforcer against your neighbors to demand payment for whatever it is you want. Outside of the immorality of asking the state for free stuff, you also guarantee that a given market will be plagued with inefficiences when you ask a single entity (the state) to assume control. That's why corruption, bad customer service, lack of innovation -- are all synonymous with government and politicians. When you strip away competition and inhibit a truly free and open market, you squash all of the necessary elements to drive prices lower, increase innovation, encourage better customer support, etc.. If your internet speeds are slow or costly, it's not because of the private market. It's very likely because of government collusion and government-granted territorial monopolies given to internet service providers -- such as the case where I live in the US. The answer is to encourage as much competition as possible, so that everyone can afford internet and not rely on government goons to mass confiscate money. ...And that's my tldr; rant of the day. ;)
Yes they should. They gave the Internet use out to the public (ARPANET, DARPANET etc etc). Internet access will foster creativity and ingenuity and thus increase the productivity for the nation and the world at large. However there are creeps out there that can and will misuse so there may be some regulations as to what is shared with the outside world (Easily said than done) . Kind of like a router on your LAN that keeps the traffic within the LAN if the source and destination are within.
Government should give everyone an equal chance and people will take it without hesitation. If everything cost money, people who have it in the beginning will always have unattainable advantage and they will have everything better. This is not fair. And people shouldn't compete, they should collaborate. The accent should be put on collaboration and sharing, instead on competition. Collaboration and sharing always win in the end. That's a common sense. Even a genius will do far lass than a team. And there is no too much geniuses in the world. This of course doesn't mean Internet should be for free, that's stupid.
1. It's not free, it's payed by taxes. The same way you pay for roads, police, public schools, etc. 2. Considering how US Internet service is among the worst and most expensive, and how you just lost net neutrality, your rant seems a bit disingenuous.
Lol loved the intro. So true. And yes, internet is a requirement to do basic tasks anymore so having basic access is inportant and should be free to all.
Happy 4th from Brazil Gary! Free internet for everyone? It would be great, but probably the quality of service would strongly drop. Seriously, continue these videos making CSS from scratch!!!! It is very useful for me and I believe it is for other people too :)
Asking whether the government should provide 'free' anything is a misnomer and whilst we do know that the government is paying for services via taxation, we are too quick to judge the efficacies of such an agent and forget that the idea of a government is the representation of the values held by the people. The absolute end of the spectrum for complete government control to the other end of the spectrum of completely free market are actually the same. The ideal free market is full of competition that benefits the consumer through innovation and affordability; but that isn't the reality in many industries. When companies get very large, we get issues that we see now with anti-competitive behaviour, buying out the competition or coordinating monopolies on districts. They don't need to innovate nor be affordable when they reach that state. There are many instances where ISPs have monopolies on different districts and they make sure it stays that way. We do need a balance between government and privatisation, and the government does need to regulate the private industry and ensure no anti-competitive practises occur. We have to ensure competition exists and prevent monopolies at all costs. A minimal government doesn't benefit anyone but the powerful (as the free market doesn't answer to the people, it answers to the shareholders) and neither does an authoritarian government benefit anyone with entrepreneurial aspirations that could cause a paradigm shift in society. I think the internet is a utility, like electricity and water. The government should own the physical infrastructure, and sell the bandwidth off to ISPs who in turn sell it to us. We can then enforce a competitive environment to ensure people have a choice with the internet. It also means that people living rurally don't have to pay exorbitant fees to get connected to the internet. All large entities are inefficient, both private and public, so it makes no difference in that aspect, KPIs are all we have to ensure best standards.
Hey Carey Turner! “O Rio de Janeiro continua lindo” but more dangerous. I really want to move to the US, at least for a while. The homeland always misses. Best regards.
Hey gray can you so some for push notification, I use onesignal, I'm trying to so something that when I send the push notification it will save in the app like the way TH-cam does so if the person accidentally clear your notification will be save in the app so they can go to a notification click on it and see what the notification was or take them to the redirect link.
The government doesn't need to provide free internet because Starbucks and McDonald's already do. Commercial companies get enough profit from your personal information and/or patronage that there will be ways to get free internet if you are happy to accept the trade-offs. You can even get free cellular service (including data) from providers like freedompop if you are okay with certain trade-offs.
Finland has got free wifi. In the public the lowest broadband and if you want faster you need to pay for it. Here in Denmark we are talking about it, but there is so many cafes finding a free connection is not a problem ;) Free wifi is a birthright like clean water and electrical power
Don't most browsers support CSS Color Module Level 4? (that is, the use of 4 and 8 digit HEX values for colors - the 4th or 7th and 8th being the alpha)
It would be nice to have free internet, but only if big companies like Google, Microsoft and Facebook were the ones providing it. It has to be from private initiatives, if not, it isn't really worth it. We need to minimize the state! XD
Internet represents an ideal of freedom, it would be logical for everyone to have access to it (of course, it would have to respect net neutrality, that's why it should be provided by the state)
Not "free" monetarily but free like "open", yes. Like your ISP shouldn't be able to restrict where you can go on the internet unless it's something clearly illegal. I guess that's debatable too though.
Yes governments should give free internet access but not in terms of money, but free as in freedom, freedom from surveillance and data collection, etc. If the internet was to go free in terms of money, then it would be really hard to maintain and kept at a fast speed that we all like.
A lesson, Government 101: if the government “gives” you something, they can ipso facto take it from you. So, no. This is incidentally why the Founding Fathers specified our God-given, or Natural Rights If you prefer, in the Bill of Rights. Those rights do not come from government; they are inherently _ours_.
I dont think the government should,but if companies like google, apple, Microsoft make so much money, they should pay for the internet. Its like asking the biggest car manufacturers, bus operators, car hire companies to pay for roads.
I watched an old film last night called "Kingsmen", and with free internet the evil villain could control people. So im perplexed on free net, because they can spy easier I guess, not that they are not doing so already.
Lol, no man. With a central authority controlling the internet, it would be much easier. Though, the NSA has already been spying on everyone for years, now. And that's because they have their hands in every major tech company.
If possible could you make tutorial on how to make an landing page with these type of SVG eg: dribbble.com/shots/4785304-AltoStack-Services Like are components ( clouds, human, buildings etc.) inside these SVG custom designed or there is some other way of doing so ? And for web developer who want to make this type of website what alternative do they have ? Thanks
I think the Internet is already free. What private-sector charge is for their employees and service charges but Yes, govt. can subsidize people by paying the private-sector.
I don’t think the government should give free internet. It’s not a utilities provider. More families need free electricity or clean water in that case. That said, they also shouldn’t be regulating it. It should be wide open.
Answer : Internet is already free but to filter it and providing the internet at home that charge is taken by the government..... if we manage to filter and bring the internet home on our own then its totally free.
Thanks for this great video! Now, I need to find time to duplicate this ... Gov. should provide free WIFII everywhere .... this shouldn’t be hard now given all most every store provide free wifii .. it is matter of how to wire them together to provide a generic free wifii experience for everyone ... Internet @ home should not be free ...
"FREE INTERNET" from the government simply means that the government would get into the internet providing business. How can companies compete with the government who doesn't actually have to make a profit to stay "in business"? So, you force good providers out of the market. Name something the government does good? Now you want to let them run the internet? That would be a sad day. internet
Ricardo Acosta Torres yeah, thats not happening. Just be delighted as you watch how their youth is getting dumber and dumber all the while leading themselves to their downfall. I sure am.
Communism when taken as a totality may be a disaster (for that matter so is capitalism) however to extract the best parts and adopt them does not hurt. In this case it may even help capitalism by fostering knowledge and growth which leads to a better workforce. We already have some of this in place at least in the software industry (freeware) and education (Khan Academy) and several others.
It's expensive because there's not enough competition and there's likely government granted monopolies to these telecomm companies of which you speak. ;) It's the same situation here in the US.
Thank you for this tutorial. I recreated your example in SASS: codepen.io/danielhoegel/pen/YvbGrO I could simplify the alignment and size of the subtitles and lines with flexbox. Furthermore I experienced way better performance using an SVG instead of clip-path and skewY instead of matrix.
Smash that Subscribe button! My answer for today's question: Let me rephrase my original question so that I can provide a better answer: 'Should governments give everyone free **anything**?', and my answer will always be a big NO.
Ask yourself, how exactly can a government be capable of giving anyone anything free? When you ask the government to give you free products or services (health care, education, internet..), they have to steal the money from their productive population in the form of taxation. It's never truly free; someone has to pay for it.
With that said, your hands aren't exactly clean if you show up at the voting box and vote for free stuff. At the very least, indirectly, you're asking the government to act as your personal enforcer against your neighbors to demand payment for whatever it is you want.
Outside of the immorality of asking the state for free stuff, you also guarantee that a given market will be plagued with inefficiences when you ask a single entity (the state) to assume control. That's why corruption, bad customer service, lack of innovation -- are all synonymous with government and politicians. When you strip away competition and inhibit a truly free and open market, you squash all of the necessary elements to drive prices lower, increase innovation, encourage better customer support, etc..
If your internet speeds are slow or costly, it's not because of the private market. It's very likely because of government collusion and government-granted territorial monopolies given to internet service providers -- such as the case where I live in the US.
The answer is to encourage as much competition as possible, so that everyone can afford internet and not rely on government goons to mass confiscate money.
...And that's my tldr; rant of the day. ;)
Yes they should. They gave the Internet use out to the public (ARPANET, DARPANET etc etc). Internet access will foster creativity and ingenuity and thus increase the productivity for the nation and the world at large. However there are creeps out there that can and will misuse so there may be some regulations as to what is shared with the outside world (Easily said than done) . Kind of like a router on your LAN that keeps the traffic within the LAN if the source and destination are within.
Government should give everyone an equal chance and people will take it without hesitation. If everything cost money, people who have it in the beginning will always have unattainable advantage and they will have everything better. This is not fair. And people shouldn't compete, they should collaborate. The accent should be put on collaboration and sharing, instead on competition. Collaboration and sharing always win in the end. That's a common sense. Even a genius will do far lass than a team. And there is no too much geniuses in the world. This of course doesn't mean Internet should be for free, that's stupid.
DesignCourse man you're such a cool man and gentle ....I must confess I like your personality...keep it up sir
1. It's not free, it's payed by taxes. The same way you pay for roads, police, public schools, etc.
2. Considering how US Internet service is among the worst and most expensive, and how you just lost net neutrality, your rant seems a bit disingenuous.
DesignCourse yes as it is now one of our most important artificial resources
"The Greatest Intro Ever" award goes to ....
Lol loved the intro. So true. And yes, internet is a requirement to do basic tasks anymore so having basic access is inportant and should be free to all.
Happy 4th from Brazil Gary! Free internet for everyone? It would be great, but probably the quality of service would strongly drop. Seriously, continue these videos making CSS from scratch!!!! It is very useful for me and I believe it is for other people too :)
Asking whether the government should provide 'free' anything is a misnomer and whilst we do know that the government is paying for services via taxation, we are too quick to judge the efficacies of such an agent and forget that the idea of a government is the representation of the values held by the people. The absolute end of the spectrum for complete government control to the other end of the spectrum of completely free market are actually the same.
The ideal free market is full of competition that benefits the consumer through innovation and affordability; but that isn't the reality in many industries. When companies get very large, we get issues that we see now with anti-competitive behaviour, buying out the competition or coordinating monopolies on districts. They don't need to innovate nor be affordable when they reach that state. There are many instances where ISPs have monopolies on different districts and they make sure it stays that way.
We do need a balance between government and privatisation, and the government does need to regulate the private industry and ensure no anti-competitive practises occur. We have to ensure competition exists and prevent monopolies at all costs. A minimal government doesn't benefit anyone but the powerful (as the free market doesn't answer to the people, it answers to the shareholders) and neither does an authoritarian government benefit anyone with entrepreneurial aspirations that could cause a paradigm shift in society.
I think the internet is a utility, like electricity and water. The government should own the physical infrastructure, and sell the bandwidth off to ISPs who in turn sell it to us. We can then enforce a competitive environment to ensure people have a choice with the internet. It also means that people living rurally don't have to pay exorbitant fees to get connected to the internet. All large entities are inefficient, both private and public, so it makes no difference in that aspect, KPIs are all we have to ensure best standards.
keep making this type of cool stuffs... love your videos!!
Happy 4th from Brazil! We here dream of a true, or at least more, freedom! I'm your fan bro! Great work.
Hey Carey Turner! “O Rio de Janeiro continua lindo” but more dangerous. I really want to move to the US, at least for a while. The homeland always misses. Best regards.
Awesome tutorial, really straight to the point... Crangrats.
This was the best intro man...
Hey gray can you so some for push notification, I use onesignal, I'm trying to so something that when I send the push notification it will save in the app like the way TH-cam does so if the person accidentally clear your notification will be save in the app so they can go to a notification click on it and see what the notification was or take them to the redirect link.
Another Great Lesson!
Which plugin auto loads the browser when you change css?
My star didn't skewed at 17:30 and I don't know what I am doing wrong.
The government doesn't need to provide free internet because Starbucks and McDonald's already do. Commercial companies get enough profit from your personal information and/or patronage that there will be ways to get free internet if you are happy to accept the trade-offs. You can even get free cellular service (including data) from providers like freedompop if you are okay with certain trade-offs.
Finland has got free wifi. In the public the lowest broadband and if you want faster you need to pay for it. Here in Denmark we are talking about it, but there is so many cafes finding a free connection is not a problem ;)
Free wifi is a birthright like clean water and electrical power
Best channel ever 👍
Didn't really get that "nth-of-type" stuff. How did top and left margin bring that line ahead!? 🤨 Just a lil confusion there.
Why did you use .container::before for the background??
We can just use it directly right?
I LOVE THE INTRO HAHA! Great job!
Don't most browsers support CSS Color Module Level 4? (that is, the use of 4 and 8 digit HEX values for colors - the 4th or 7th and 8th being the alpha)
are matrix z y x values?
It would be nice to have free internet, but only if big companies like Google, Microsoft and Facebook were the ones providing it. It has to be from private initiatives, if not, it isn't really worth it. We need to minimize the state!
XD
pointdotpoint Yeah, it's true that if it is not the GAFA that provide access to the internet, we would be less dependent on them, it would be a pity
Such lovely start :)))
Risky gamble to mix politics in a channel.
But I respect your bravery😃
How can i make text fade in and out to another text on the same line? please help
Internet represents an ideal of freedom, it would be logical for everyone to have access to it (of course, it would have to respect net neutrality, that's why it should be provided by the state)
Not "free" monetarily but free like "open", yes. Like your ISP shouldn't be able to restrict where you can go on the internet unless it's something clearly illegal. I guess that's debatable too though.
Hey is it responsive?
Happy 4th of July! Government should guarantee that internet is open, freedom and neutrality
Yes governments should give free internet access but not in terms of money, but free as in freedom, freedom from surveillance and data collection, etc. If the internet was to go free in terms of money, then it would be really hard to maintain and kept at a fast speed that we all like.
A lesson, Government 101: if the government “gives” you something, they can ipso facto take it from you. So, no.
This is incidentally why the Founding Fathers specified our God-given, or Natural Rights If you prefer, in the Bill of Rights. Those rights do not come from government; they are inherently _ours_.
I dont think the government should,but if companies like google, apple, Microsoft make so much money, they should pay for the internet. Its like asking the biggest car manufacturers, bus operators, car hire companies to pay for roads.
As great as always! Keep it up, I love your viedos.
I don't live in America, so not getting involved in this one.
plz make a video on transform 3d,rotate 3d all the 3d stuff !!!
So you want us to answer your question with a question??
Internet should be paid service like water and electricity. The pay rate should low so that people could get access to the internet
I'd love to see a responsive version 😃
I watched an old film last night called "Kingsmen", and with free internet the evil villain could control people. So im perplexed on free net, because they can spy easier I guess, not that they are not doing so already.
Lol, no man. With a central authority controlling the internet, it would be much easier. Though, the NSA has already been spying on everyone for years, now. And that's because they have their hands in every major tech company.
Loved your expressions
Nothing should be free but reasonable price should always be there.
Oscar for me!
Thanks dude
If possible could you make tutorial on how to make an landing page with these type of SVG
eg: dribbble.com/shots/4785304-AltoStack-Services
Like are components ( clouds, human, buildings etc.) inside these SVG custom designed or there is some other way of doing so ? And for web developer who want to make this type of website what alternative do they have ? Thanks
Wow....!!! Amigo gracias....
Happy 4TH ! If the government gives everyone free Internet access we will not live outside of the house. NO.
I think the Internet is already free. What private-sector charge is for their employees and service charges but Yes, govt. can subsidize people by paying the private-sector.
But I don't know much about the USA. I was talking about my country.
just use :root pseudo class for variables :)
Someone’s been reading Hayek...
You don't need to read Hayek to come to the conclusions that the author did. I've known this for a long time, and I haven't read Hayek.
Yes because Internet is the need of all and one it's free for ones and that's good
Would be great but think about the government control and spying kinda scary by the way love the vids
I don’t think the government should give free internet. It’s not a utilities provider. More families need free electricity or clean water in that case.
That said, they also shouldn’t be regulating it. It should be wide open.
Answer :
Internet is already free but to filter it and providing the internet at home that charge is taken by the government.....
if we manage to filter and bring the internet home on our own then its totally free.
The internet is free* if you want to pay for your own cables and equipment.
You are my guru
Definitely they should give it
yes free internet....if fcc says cable signal is public domain that's should be the same premise
Thanks for this great video! Now, I need to find time to duplicate this ... Gov. should provide free WIFII everywhere .... this shouldn’t be hard now given all most every store provide free wifii .. it is matter of how to wire them together to provide a generic free wifii experience for everyone ... Internet @ home should not be free ...
Free is Ok as long as they tax you for it
If it's not moral for you to force your neighbors to pay for stuff you want at the point of a gun, then it's not moral for the government to do it.
Yea
Awesome
"FREE INTERNET" from the government simply means that the government would get into the internet providing business. How can companies compete with the government who doesn't actually have to make a profit to stay "in business"? So, you force good providers out of the market. Name something the government does good? Now you want to let them run the internet? That would be a sad day. internet
Nailed it.
i prefer faster and free ( from the malpractice ) internet
Yes
yes
Make it free on the rest of the world.
Answer: Yep, easy for hackers to hack the other person's data 😄😅
Move to Poland :) We have free internet here named AERO and high speed access for money is too cheap. Too many trolls out there :D.
Where is uncle sam ?
Answer: No, America is not communism.
Ricardo Acosta Torres It is in the process of becoming one, though.
Black Clover Yes that's indeed correct, let them grow and be the first one to act first with violence so we get the reason to despose them.
Ricardo Acosta Torres yeah, thats not happening. Just be delighted as you watch how their youth is getting dumber and dumber all the while leading themselves to their downfall. I sure am.
Communism when taken as a totality may be a disaster (for that matter so is capitalism) however to extract the best parts and adopt them does not hurt. In this case it may even help capitalism by fostering knowledge and growth which leads to a better workforce. We already have some of this in place at least in the software industry (freeware) and education (Khan Academy) and several others.
M Singh do not mix software and knowledge with real goods as private property.
FREEE internet cause we poor fellows dying in Singapore because telecommunications contract plans are expensive
It's expensive because there's not enough competition and there's likely government granted monopolies to these telecomm companies of which you speak. ;) It's the same situation here in the US.
DesignCourse OMG u replied me 😱 cannn teach me how to apply for US immigrant visa? i want to move to US to marry my current girlfriend 😂
That was a great intro 😁 so glad I live in Europe.
Thank you for this tutorial. I recreated your example in SASS: codepen.io/danielhoegel/pen/YvbGrO
I could simplify the alignment and size of the subtitles and lines with flexbox.
Furthermore I experienced way better performance using an SVG instead of clip-path and skewY instead of matrix.
👍
Nope free internet means they control your internet.
cool
what's that mean?
YESSSSSS
hahahahahahahah get decent medical care first, then talk about free internet ;)
😃🤩
No.
This was the best intro man..