If they can match the Saturn V's 100% success record that would be an achievement. I also appreciate their homage to the American space pioneers. Will the next be New Armstrong?
@@Rizzler420-uh4yd Bezos isn't a Russian supporter, that title belongs to Elon Musk,he is the one who publicaly claimed that Crimea should belong to Russia , and denied Ukraine the right to use starlink satellites that were purchased from his business above their own land ( requignazed by internationall laws, and the US government),because that land was occupied by Russia.
@Rizzler420-uh4yd It was built in Constanța Romania, not Russia. And everyone knows the best shipyards along the Black Sea are Ukranian to start with.
@@davidstevenson9517 yup, they got their own launch pad and they didn’t end up sharing as Jeff asked for back in 2013. I just found it funny that he fought against Space X using it exclusively, 11 years before they have a rocket ready *He wanted pad 39a for historical significance, in case anyone missed the news back then
Crazy that BO is trying to launch payloads on its test flight. It is also crazy that they are going to try to land one AT SEA on the first flight. They have the potential to destroy their landing platform as well as several 3rd party payloads. That is the danger of delaying something for a period of ...like... forever. When you do fly, you are behind schedule, so you take more risks, and you have to make everything go perfectly. BO seems to be following ULA's model for booster development rather than SpaceX's method. This may be because of their vehicle takes longer to build and is more expensive, so they can't have a "hardware rich" development cycle like Starship. Stainless Steel definitely has its advantages.
u know at this point this shit just story trying to proc up jeff bezos, this company is not launching shit. consider it was found 24 years ago way before space x, look where space x at. u telling me they can compete lol, tell me when they get to LEO and come back which something they still can not prove.
@1:25 You didn't mention that the cryogenic pathfinder New Glenn is not being used for the tests currently underway with the GS-1 simulator because it is back at the factory being retrofitted with engines along with other hardware for the critical wet dress rehearsal and static hotfire tests that will validate the launcher systems ahead of the maiden launch. Another New Glenn will carry the twin EscaPADE spacecraft and then the pathfinder will be refurbished for a future mission.
I really think they should have built a smaller intermediate sized rocket first. Maybe it just didn’t look cost effective so they decided to take a huge leap in size and complexity.
Seems a bit optimistic. As does landing on the barge. It will be much harder considering the much larger rocket landing on a moving target. Depending on how it lands it could also be multiple engines. I’m not sure on that though.
Blue Origins BE-4 engines performed perfectly when they successfully launched ULAs Vulcan in January this year. Perhaps you're superimposing the "blunt" SpaceX modus operandi and acceptable performance levels on a more "refined" Blue Origin. These two companies have very different approaches to launcher development.
I mean basically everyone who has made an orbital class rocket has had issues with these things, so it’s pretty much expected. I think it’s crazy what they are going for with the first flight and we’ll just have to see how it goes…
2 engines performed well on a single flight. That is certainly important, but it doesn’t tell us if they are reliable. They also have to relight on new Glenn which they have never done BE4. A 7 engine setup will be much more complicated then a 2 engine one. Once they have a couple of successful static fires then I may agree with you.
The FAA never delays; the FAA puts a rocket program on hold when there has been an unexpected deviation from the flight plan. The FAA never delays Starship; rather, SpaceX stalls when filing the mishap investigation report, and list of corrective measures taken, that the FAA has requested from SpaceX. The FAA processes these SpaceX Reports in HALF the time it took SpaceX to prepare and forward them to the FAA! SpaceX is to blame for every delay in both Starship AND Artemis launch schedules.
BO moves slowly so they have plenty of time to get the launch license and environmental impact reports done. Will they launch this year who knows but someday!
WANT to see a schedule? What cheek! Who cares about a schedule when all that matters are results. Five months ago, ULA produced successful results with BO engines propelling Vulcan into the beginning of its intended long career. "Faith" is a concept that has no place in Science or with its offspring, Engineering. Yet, "faith" is a constant refrain from SpaceX Cultists which, Thomas, I believe you to be. Be sensible, Thomas; keep an open mind, learn patience and quietly observe. Otherwise, you look naive and foolish.
@@davidstevenson9517 Yeah, I want to see them actually set a date where they estimate it will be ready. Without it they just go years and years and years and years. Put all the colorful language you want around it, their progress has been glacial.
I highly expect this first new Glenn flight to go off nearly perfect. The new Shepard vessel is solid and they've learned a lot with it... Also, Bezos clearly knows a lot about rocketry, despite not cosplaying as an engineer like Musk does. When asked "any build such a big rocket" Musk will ramble about how it's "cool", whereas Bezos will clearly tell you it's simply "easier" than landing a smaller rocket cause "imagine balancing a pencil on your finger instead of a mop." What was it Einstein said about not being able to explain things simply? It means you don't understand the concept.
Misquoted Einstein and made completely false claims lol. Bezos is not a rocket expert nor an engineer. New Glenn is by no means anything new nor groundbreaking. It will attempt to do what a large Falcon 9 can. The BE-4 engine is nothing new either. A closed cycle oxygen rich engine has been mastered decades ago. So obviously talking about it would be easy. Starship is a vehicle in its own class entirely. Capabilities unparalleled with an engine that's a one of a kind. I do believe New Glenn will launch the payload perfectly. But it will not land. Then comes the several months after to make a new one
New Shepard is a small, sub orbital rocket that has been in development for a very long time and yet had a failure pretty recently, it is not even close to something like Falcon 9. Musk clearly knows more about rocketry than Bezo, SpaceX has been far more successful than Blue Origin, with (to dat)e hundreds of orbital launches vs 0 for Blue Origin, bar the fact they were founded around the same time. No guff about "pencils" and "mops" will change that.
Is it just your expectation of the new glenn to be "nearly perfect" or a vision you had after a heavy night of drinking? Bezos clearly knows "a lot about rocketry" is a fallacy. He pays people to know a lot about rocketry. Bezos is off on his yacht with his sweety. EM has forgotten more about rocketry than Bezos knows. Let's stop the delusion please.
@snakevenom4954 Even that sounds optimistic. I believe it will fly eventually. I doubt it will have any, let alone 2 launches this year. We will get a better idea once it does a static fire of all 7 engines.
Good question! The United States FAA seems to take several months to give approval. Who announces FAA approval, the FAA or the launcher company applying?
This is at a level of planning beyond your TH-cam. TIK TOK, education. Blue has been working with FAA for the range for several years, the permit application takes place at the END of this process.
Space x that has 15 years experience and a high turnaround rate for design and manufacturing hasn’t gotten it right yet. How a company that’s never reached orbit and stuck with the same unproven design for 10 years. They haven’t even done a Wet dress rehearsal
What does that mean? What have they shown? So far the rocket is still not finished with actual flight hardware. No static fire. No test landing. They have never launched an orbital rocket. And they had an engine failure on their tiny new shepherd not that long ago.
Obviously, Elon is worried Blue Origin might actually try to land on a pad before he does. Elon seems to be pushing to try and catch the booster with flight 5.
Your probably right, Spaz; Elon Musk must be cringing at the thought of New Glenn making a successful barge landing before Starship is caught in the maw of Mechazilla. Still, Elon Musk has installed Gwynne Shotwell as CEO of SpaceX, so he has a "fallguy" on hand for his SpaceX Cultists to blame. (For his sake, EM must hope that Shotwell will live up to her name)
@@thedausthed New Glenn is just as reusable as either Falcon but lifts nearly four times the payload of both: 35-40tn, not a mere 10tn. Elon Musk knows that the Falcons are destined to work the lower end of the "Heavy Payload" market. So do investors.
@@davidstevenson9517 It lifts more AND it's coming out 10+ years later. It's not how much it can lift but how much it costs, that's what ACTUAL investors care about. That's a flashy organization. Lots of overhead.
Yeah! Indicative of what confidence Blue Origin have in their reusable launcher. Even though the Martian payload is 'D' Class, let's hope BOs confidence isn't misplaced.
I doubt Blew Organ is anywhere close at all to flight, unless something detonates. If there's any thought it's that they need to appear they are an aerospace company when they end up having to buy ULA.
I suspect, Mairus, the author of the above Comment was indulging in exactly that as he was typing his corruption of Blue Origin. What a "Freudian Slip"!🤛
They bought ULA because there is no room to expand BO Huntsville plant and they expending big. from 400 employees At BO Florida in 2020 to 6000 in 2024 . same in all plants
Is Blue Origin privately owned? If it has shareholders, their stock value is suppressed by hiding their accomplishments along the road to launch readiness. Stock prices are effected by how stoked the public gets about the project. Elon's ventures have overvalued stock because of the hype and public enthusiasm. Its literally money for showmanship, which baldie lacks.
So how exactly does New Glenn materially change the space industry ? "it’s hoping to become a large competitor within the industry, offering low prices and reliability" Riiiggght... I would bet on none of those points materialising. If ULA can't get Vulcan to close as a business case - what would make BO and NG ???
Barry, ULA has signed at least 40 launch contracts for Vulcan/Centaur before the end of 2025 (including DoD). Evidently the Space Market doesn't agree with your assessment of ULA. Falcon max. lift to LEO: 10tn. Vulcan max. lit tn to LEO: 28tn New Glenn max lift to LEO: 45tn All three are partially reusable i.e. the New Age Heavy Lifters for Low, Medium and High Payloads to LEO and Beyond. The Space Market has room for each of these partially reusable Heavies .
no one is hating, we all just simply stating fact. this company just all talk, it was founded before space x launch their first falcon including test phase. 24 years later, it still has not launch 1 single rocket that made it to LEO. worst then ULA, at least they actually can launch something even if it cost u an arm or leg.
@@iamscoutstfu ULA engine r all old russian engine, elon already said it multiple time. the new one u spoke off was a revision of a 60 years old engine coming some time next year lol. and by the way vulcan still not a reusable rocket lol, mean while space x on track to deliver 90% of the "entire world" payload by the end of this year with target of 140 launches. ULA and blue origin r a jokes at this point, not even worth mentioning. cope harder lol.
Saat applo kecil menempel ke dinding appolo besar lama waktu yang di butuhkan adalah 1 x 12 jam yaitu : 1. Saat belahan gelap di setengah bukan purnama terang selama 12 jam gelap 2. Selama di setwngah bukan yang terang appollo ditempek ke dinding appolo besar tidak seperti ROBOT BEKERJAAAAAAA 3. Karwna saat start appolo kecil ke BTS dinding appolo nesar di perjaman appolo kecil seperti detik jam dinding berjakan jadi selama membuat pengembakinan waktu selama 2abad24 fahun lagi mendatang BIKAN PERGI MEMUTAR JARI. JAM DI DING NABAWI ini keejaanmj GAGABAH RIDAK ADA aturan berakibat TERJADINYA GERHANAN MATAHARI DI TAHUN 2016 samoai di tahun 2024 sekarang, 2024 ☔☔☂️☂️☂️☂️☂️☃️☃️⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄🗼🗼🗼🗼🗼🗼🗼🗼☔☔☔☂️☂️🗼🗼🗼🗼📢📢📣📣📣📯📯📯📯📯☔☔☂️☂️☂️☂️☂️🙏🙏🙏🙏
Blue Origins low profile PR (1:45) isn't such a bad policy after all. Silence, it's turning out, does not necessarily mean inactivity. BOs PR only comes into action when they have genuine results at each development stage (as does the PR of their business associate, ULA). This is in stark contrast to SpaceX; with their much touted Starship, they trumpet what they INTEND to do but when failure results, SpaceX claims success anyway. This year, 2024, the true colours of these three private launchers are coming to light; and Starship is looking rather pale in comparison to New Glenn and Vulcan. Why, Starship looks like it's lying prone at "Deaths Door"!
Yeah, it's 2024, and SpaceX has nothing to show for it. Where as Blue Origin has had hundreds of launches and cornered a big chunk of the space launch market, while having developed and built hundreds of their new full-flow staged combustion engine that no company can come close in cost. Oh, what is SpaceX gonna do??? If only they're working on a fully reusable rocket that doesn't require you to throw away the second stage on every flight that no other companies can offer.
Vulcan and New Glenn are not even close to being competitors with Starship. Vulcan is only in the same class as a Falcon 9, but with no possibility of recovering the first stage and New Glenn is less capable than Falcon Heavy, both of them are also many years later than SpaceX's rockets. So neither is at all comparable with Starship, which should be flying to orbit and maybe even recovering the first stage before the much less capable New Glenn leaves the ground for the first time.
The only thing "pale" here is your deluded description of Starships progress. "BOs PR only comes into action when they have genuine results at each development stage," yes, inside their hanger, out of sight.
They don't have any obligation to advertise themselves to the general public. Especially when spacex does it so much BECAUSE THEY STAY AFLOAT WITH INVESTOR MONEY
I just LOVE baiting you naive SpaceX Cultists! My fellow EXPERIENCED Spaceflight Observers and I note that you "Brownshirts" for Elon Musk have been on the defensive ever since NASA announced they had chosen a second Artemis lander, Blue Moon from BO. NASA didnt trust SpaceX to come up with the goods; to date, it's seems they were right to be concerned. The sight of ULAs Vulcan with BOs BE-4 engines launching flawlessly had you SpaceX Cultists grinding your teeth in fury. Oh Dear. How sad. It's always a pleasure to watch arrogant, ignorant loudmouths get their comeuppance. Keep watching, "Brownshirts"!!! (Hello from New Zealand🇳🇿)
Cannot wait to see this thing fly.
You will be waiting a long time.
If anybody deserves a trip into space, it's Glenn Close. She's just awesome.
Great. We need everyone who tries to get there.
THAT'S THE SPIRIT!!!
If they can match the Saturn V's 100% success record that would be an achievement. I also appreciate their homage to the American space pioneers. Will the next be New Armstrong?
Considering the landing platform crossing the Bosphorus in Istanbul, it originated somewhere in the Black Sea.
Lame! Leave it to Jeff Bezos to support Russia.
It was built in a Shipyards in Romania.
@@Rizzler420-uh4yd Bezos isn't a Russian supporter, that title belongs to Elon Musk,he is the one who publicaly claimed that Crimea should belong to Russia , and denied Ukraine the right to use starlink satellites that were purchased from his business above their own land ( requignazed by internationall laws, and the US government),because that land was occupied by Russia.
@@Rizzler420-uh4ydDo you RESEARCH. Shipyard specializes in oil rigs and custom research and commercial vessels.
@Rizzler420-uh4yd It was built in Constanța Romania, not Russia. And everyone knows the best shipyards along the Black Sea are Ukranian to start with.
Remember in 2013 when Jeff wanted to keep SpaceX from hogging launchpad 39A? This is why! They're finally ready!
Actually, Lanzer, Blue Origin use launchpad LC36 for New Glenn, 18kms South of LC39A.
(For decades this launch pad launched Atlas/Centaur)
@@davidstevenson9517 yup, they got their own launch pad and they didn’t end up sharing as Jeff asked for back in 2013. I just found it funny that he fought against Space X using it exclusively, 11 years before they have a rocket ready
*He wanted pad 39a for historical significance, in case anyone missed the news back then
@@lanzer22 hilarious 🙂
Unless they are testing stages indoors, they have a lot of work to do.
On the computer.
Stage testing for Vulcan began only weeks before launch, with the construction of the upper stage only beginning 7 months beforehand.
Blue Origin - Yesterday's Rockets, Tomorrow.
tkirby - a whining a**hole who sits behind his computer doing nothing but shitting on other people.
You are obviously in a rush. Where ya goin?
“Glenn Close” in the title had me for a second. 😂
Hahahha
Crazy that BO is trying to launch payloads on its test flight. It is also crazy that they are going to try to land one AT SEA on the first flight. They have the potential to destroy their landing platform as well as several 3rd party payloads.
That is the danger of delaying something for a period of ...like... forever. When you do fly, you are behind schedule, so you take more risks, and you have to make everything go perfectly. BO seems to be following ULA's model for booster development rather than SpaceX's method. This may be because of their vehicle takes longer to build and is more expensive, so they can't have a "hardware rich" development cycle like Starship. Stainless Steel definitely has its advantages.
u know at this point this shit just story trying to proc up jeff bezos, this company is not launching shit. consider it was found 24 years ago way before space x, look where space x at. u telling me they can compete lol, tell me when they get to LEO and come back which something they still can not prove.
@1:25 You didn't mention that the cryogenic pathfinder New Glenn is not being used for the tests currently underway with the GS-1 simulator because it is back at the factory being retrofitted with engines along with other hardware for the critical wet dress rehearsal and static hotfire tests that will validate the launcher systems ahead of the maiden launch.
Another New Glenn will carry the twin EscaPADE spacecraft and then the pathfinder will be refurbished for a future mission.
There was no unmanned flight of space shuttle before John Young and Robert Crippen flew on Columbia.
It’s a good looking rocket man. Hope to see it fly before 2030
I really think they should have built a smaller intermediate sized rocket first. Maybe it just didn’t look cost effective so they decided to take a huge leap in size and complexity.
@@jamskinner Rocket Lab did the same thing, going direct from their little Electron rocket to the much larger Neutron rocket.
Thanks for the update.
5 months for new glenn launch?? Tell me when Elvis gets here.
Seems a bit optimistic. As does landing on the barge. It will be much harder considering the much larger rocket landing on a moving target. Depending on how it lands it could also be multiple engines. I’m not sure on that though.
Wouldn’t be interesting if we could place bets?
Elvis WILL return. When? ON the new Glenn....
@jamskinner larger rockets are actually easier to land. Think about balancing a ruler vs a mop on your hand.
Calm down, there, Beldar.
I hope I'm wrong, but I think that this rocket is going to have problems with delays, engines, and landing.
Blue Origins BE-4 engines performed perfectly when they successfully launched ULAs Vulcan in January this year.
Perhaps you're superimposing the "blunt" SpaceX modus operandi and acceptable performance levels on a more "refined" Blue Origin.
These two companies have very different approaches to launcher development.
I mean basically everyone who has made an orbital class rocket has had issues with these things, so it’s pretty much expected. I think it’s crazy what they are going for with the first flight and we’ll just have to see how it goes…
2 engines performed well on a single flight. That is certainly important, but it doesn’t tell us if they are reliable. They also have to relight on new Glenn which they have never done BE4. A 7 engine setup will be much more complicated then a 2 engine one.
Once they have a couple of successful static fires then I may agree with you.
@alexlabs4858
Especially considering they have never even launched into orbit before.
Yeah. See you in 2.5 years
a lot of things going on
Looks like 2024 could be a turning point in the Second Space Race. Very exciting.
25 years and they haven't launched a orbital rocket!. It better be good this new glen, or is it old glen now?
Nice update, again! Cheers
Will the FAA delay in issuing a license to launch New Glenn?
The FAA never delays; the FAA puts a rocket program on hold when there has been an unexpected deviation from the flight plan.
The FAA never delays Starship; rather, SpaceX stalls when filing the mishap investigation report, and list of corrective measures taken, that the FAA has requested from SpaceX.
The FAA processes these SpaceX Reports in HALF the time it took SpaceX to prepare and forward them to the FAA!
SpaceX is to blame for every delay in both Starship AND Artemis launch schedules.
BO moves slowly so they have plenty of time to get the launch license and environmental impact reports done. Will they launch this year who knows but someday!
Any year now........
Five months so.. November? I want to see it on a schedule before I have any faith it will go.
WANT to see a schedule? What cheek! Who cares about a schedule when all that matters are results.
Five months ago, ULA produced successful results with BO engines propelling Vulcan into the beginning of its intended long career.
"Faith" is a concept that has no place in Science or with its offspring, Engineering.
Yet, "faith" is a constant refrain from SpaceX Cultists which, Thomas, I believe you to be.
Be sensible, Thomas; keep an open mind, learn patience and quietly observe. Otherwise, you look naive and foolish.
@@davidstevenson9517 Yeah, I want to see them actually set a date where they estimate it will be ready. Without it they just go years and years and years and years. Put all the colorful language you want around it, their progress has been glacial.
They’re not going to ready by November. It’s probably going to have to wait two years for the next Mars window.
Very risky to launch a payload on a very first test flight.
They can also use starship.
They should use starship to tug the new glenn and then catch it with chopstics.
Outstanding CGI. As always.
I highly expect this first new Glenn flight to go off nearly perfect.
The new Shepard vessel is solid and they've learned a lot with it...
Also, Bezos clearly knows a lot about rocketry, despite not cosplaying as an engineer like Musk does.
When asked "any build such a big rocket" Musk will ramble about how it's "cool", whereas Bezos will clearly tell you it's simply "easier" than landing a smaller rocket cause "imagine balancing a pencil on your finger instead of a mop."
What was it Einstein said about not being able to explain things simply?
It means you don't understand the concept.
Misquoted Einstein and made completely false claims lol. Bezos is not a rocket expert nor an engineer.
New Glenn is by no means anything new nor groundbreaking. It will attempt to do what a large Falcon 9 can.
The BE-4 engine is nothing new either. A closed cycle oxygen rich engine has been mastered decades ago. So obviously talking about it would be easy.
Starship is a vehicle in its own class entirely. Capabilities unparalleled with an engine that's a one of a kind.
I do believe New Glenn will launch the payload perfectly. But it will not land. Then comes the several months after to make a new one
Sarcasm meter is over 9000!
New Shepard is a small, sub orbital rocket that has been in development for a very long time and yet had a failure pretty recently, it is not even close to something like Falcon 9.
Musk clearly knows more about rocketry than Bezo, SpaceX has been far more successful than Blue Origin, with (to dat)e hundreds of orbital launches vs 0 for Blue Origin, bar the fact they were founded around the same time. No guff about "pencils" and "mops" will change that.
Is it just your expectation of the new glenn to be "nearly perfect" or a vision you had after a heavy night of drinking? Bezos clearly knows "a lot about rocketry" is a fallacy. He pays people to know a lot about rocketry. Bezos is off on his yacht with his sweety. EM has forgotten more about rocketry than Bezos knows. Let's stop the delusion please.
@snakevenom4954
Even that sounds optimistic. I believe it will fly eventually. I doubt it will have any, let alone 2 launches this year. We will get a better idea once it does a static fire of all 7 engines.
More CGI, Jeff? So cool! Competing with Meta space now.
Is it true that Blue Origin has already rec'd FAA launch approval for New Glenn ???
Good question! The United States FAA seems to take several months to give approval.
Who announces FAA approval, the FAA or the launcher company applying?
Has BO even applied? I doubt it.
This is at a level of planning beyond your TH-cam. TIK TOK, education. Blue has been working with FAA for the range for several years, the permit application takes place at the END of this process.
@@sandbridgekid4121 The irony of your post....
Space x that has 15 years experience and a high turnaround rate for design and manufacturing hasn’t gotten it right yet. How a company that’s never reached orbit and stuck with the same unproven design for 10 years. They haven’t even done a Wet dress rehearsal
Theyve launched 24 rockets bro.
They have plenty of experience.
@@iamscoutstfu that's launching a single small rocket up then it falls down in exactly the same place. scaling up the rocket is another thing entirely
@@iamscoutstfuit’s a big stretch between those 24 suborbital launches vs SpaceX
@@robl1621 Only for you.
Good luck to Jeff never been to Spaceozs!
“Five months from now”
*checks video to see how old it is.
"Blue Origin Is Trying To Launch New Glenn This Year" Or maybe next year, or maybe next decade . . .
Can't wait to see another "Trying to launch" next year 😂
Thanks
If it’s behind schedule are they going to launch the probes on a different rocket?
They are really doing things right and it shows.
What does that mean? What have they shown? So far the rocket is still not finished with actual flight hardware. No static fire. No test landing. They have never launched an orbital rocket. And they had an engine failure on their tiny new shepherd not that long ago.
Hahahahahaha 😄
That's sarcasm, to all you that missed it.
Obviously, Elon is worried Blue Origin might actually try to land on a pad before he does. Elon seems to be pushing to try and catch the booster with flight 5.
Your probably right, Spaz; Elon Musk must be cringing at the thought of New Glenn making a successful barge landing before Starship is caught in the maw of Mechazilla.
Still, Elon Musk has installed Gwynne Shotwell as CEO of SpaceX, so he has a "fallguy" on hand for his SpaceX Cultists to blame.
(For his sake, EM must hope that Shotwell will live up to her name)
Why would he be worried about what a rocket that is not even an equivalent to the 6 year old Falcon Heavy is doing?
@@thedausthed New Glenn is just as reusable as either Falcon but lifts nearly four times the payload of both: 35-40tn, not a mere 10tn. Elon Musk knows that the Falcons are destined to work the lower end of the "Heavy Payload" market. So do investors.
@@davidstevenson9517 It lifts more AND it's coming out 10+ years later. It's not how much it can lift but how much it costs, that's what ACTUAL investors care about. That's a flashy organization. Lots of overhead.
@davidstevenson9517
And starship will do the rest. Especially if the develop an expendable upper stage. Something I think they should have done first.
Not even a validation flight? Wow.!
Yeah! Indicative of what confidence Blue Origin have in their reusable launcher.
Even though the Martian payload is 'D' Class, let's hope BOs confidence isn't misplaced.
@@davidstevenson9517 - You call it confidence - history calls it arrogance.
@JohnnyWednesday
It’s a throwaway flight. Doesn’t hurt to launch something cheap. The problem is they are on the clock.
@@JohnnyWednesday The F1 had paying payloads on the first flight.
I doubt Blew Organ is anywhere close at all to flight, unless something detonates. If there's any thought it's that they need to appear they are an aerospace company when they end up having to buy ULA.
“Blew Organ” that’s a new one
I suspect, Mairus, the author of the above Comment was indulging in exactly that as he was typing his corruption of Blue Origin.
What a "Freudian Slip"!🤛
They bought ULA because there is no room to expand BO Huntsville plant and they expending big. from 400 employees At BO Florida in 2020 to 6000 in 2024 . same in all plants
I agree
At this rate, when will they pass SpaceX
Pass by what metric?
@@TheEvilmooseofdoom very thick sarcasm
Always the same footage and animations.... give me something real and significative
How exciting. The united states 🇺🇸 has multiple rockets.
Landing Platform Vessel 1? Blue Orgin really knows how to be as boring as possible.
What is your name, Mr. Space Bucket?
😎😎😎
That's a big "bleeping" rocket.
Blue Origin is not Seatle nor amazon
I don't blame other mavericks for trying.. but Space X has terminal velocity in the industry ❤
Is Blue Origin privately owned? If it has shareholders, their stock value is suppressed by hiding their accomplishments along the road to launch readiness. Stock prices are effected by how stoked the public gets about the project. Elon's ventures have overvalued stock because of the hype and public enthusiasm. Its literally money for showmanship, which baldie lacks.
Blue organ; Launch this year???????????????🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
talking way, way to fast
So how exactly does New Glenn materially change the space industry ?
"it’s hoping to become a large competitor within the industry, offering low prices and reliability"
Riiiggght...
I would bet on none of those points materialising.
If ULA can't get Vulcan to close as a business case - what would make BO and NG ???
Barry, ULA has signed at least 40 launch contracts for Vulcan/Centaur before the end of 2025 (including DoD).
Evidently the Space Market doesn't agree with your assessment of ULA.
Falcon max. lift to LEO: 10tn.
Vulcan max. lit tn to LEO: 28tn
New Glenn max lift to LEO: 45tn
All three are partially reusable i.e. the New Age Heavy Lifters for Low, Medium and High Payloads to LEO and Beyond.
The Space Market has room for each of these partially reusable Heavies .
@@davidstevenson9517
Then why is there gossip that ULA will be put up to be sold?
If it was so solid...?
@@davidstevenson9517 When landing on a done ship the F9 can put 17 tons into LEO. Not 10 Max.
BO haters seething in the comments.
no one is hating, we all just simply stating fact. this company just all talk, it was founded before space x launch their first falcon including test phase. 24 years later, it still has not launch 1 single rocket that made it to LEO. worst then ULA, at least they actually can launch something even if it cost u an arm or leg.
@@laujack24 ULA Vulcan launched on Blue engines bro. The engines y'know, get you to orbit.
Please continue to seethe
@@iamscoutstfu ULA engine r all old russian engine, elon already said it multiple time. the new one u spoke off was a revision of a 60 years old engine coming some time next year lol. and by the way vulcan still not a reusable rocket lol, mean while space x on track to deliver 90% of the "entire world" payload by the end of this year with target of 140 launches. ULA and blue origin r a jokes at this point, not even worth mentioning. cope harder lol.
Old story. * months old.
A recent PR statement from a private Space company is always news. Go back to sleep, Pete van Winkle.🛌💤
Saat applo kecil menempel ke dinding appolo besar lama waktu yang di butuhkan adalah 1 x 12 jam yaitu :
1. Saat belahan gelap di setengah bukan purnama terang selama 12 jam gelap
2. Selama di setwngah bukan yang terang appollo ditempek ke dinding appolo besar tidak seperti ROBOT BEKERJAAAAAAA
3. Karwna saat start appolo kecil ke BTS dinding appolo nesar di perjaman appolo kecil seperti detik jam dinding berjakan jadi selama membuat pengembakinan waktu selama 2abad24 fahun lagi mendatang BIKAN PERGI MEMUTAR JARI. JAM DI DING NABAWI ini keejaanmj GAGABAH RIDAK ADA aturan berakibat TERJADINYA GERHANAN MATAHARI DI TAHUN 2016 samoai di tahun 2024 sekarang, 2024 ☔☔☂️☂️☂️☂️☂️☃️☃️⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄🗼🗼🗼🗼🗼🗼🗼🗼☔☔☔☂️☂️🗼🗼🗼🗼📢📢📣📣📣📯📯📯📯📯☔☔☂️☂️☂️☂️☂️🙏🙏🙏🙏
Blue Origins low profile PR (1:45) isn't such a bad policy after all. Silence, it's turning out, does not necessarily mean inactivity.
BOs PR only comes into action when they have genuine results at each development stage (as does the PR of their business associate, ULA).
This is in stark contrast to SpaceX; with their much touted Starship, they trumpet what they INTEND to do but when failure results, SpaceX claims success anyway.
This year, 2024, the true colours of these three private launchers are coming to light; and Starship is looking rather pale in comparison to New Glenn and Vulcan.
Why, Starship looks like it's lying prone at "Deaths Door"!
Yeah, it's 2024, and SpaceX has nothing to show for it. Where as Blue Origin has had hundreds of launches and cornered a big chunk of the space launch market, while having developed and built hundreds of their new full-flow staged combustion engine that no company can come close in cost. Oh, what is SpaceX gonna do??? If only they're working on a fully reusable rocket that doesn't require you to throw away the second stage on every flight that no other companies can offer.
Vulcan and New Glenn are not even close to being competitors with Starship. Vulcan is only in the same class as a Falcon 9, but with no possibility of recovering the first stage and New Glenn is less capable than Falcon Heavy, both of them are also many years later than SpaceX's rockets. So neither is at all comparable with Starship, which should be flying to orbit and maybe even recovering the first stage before the much less capable New Glenn leaves the ground for the first time.
The only thing "pale" here is your deluded description of Starships progress. "BOs PR only comes into action when they have genuine results at each development stage," yes, inside their hanger, out of sight.
They don't have any obligation to advertise themselves to the general public. Especially when spacex does it so much BECAUSE THEY STAY AFLOAT WITH INVESTOR MONEY
I just LOVE baiting you naive SpaceX Cultists! My fellow EXPERIENCED Spaceflight Observers and I note that you "Brownshirts" for Elon Musk have been on the defensive ever since NASA announced they had chosen a second Artemis lander, Blue Moon from BO.
NASA didnt trust SpaceX to come up with the goods; to date, it's seems they were right to be concerned.
The sight of ULAs Vulcan with BOs BE-4 engines launching flawlessly had you SpaceX Cultists grinding your teeth in fury. Oh Dear. How sad.
It's always a pleasure to watch arrogant, ignorant loudmouths get their comeuppance.
Keep watching, "Brownshirts"!!!
(Hello from New Zealand🇳🇿)
Blue origin is a waste of time.
BO stinks. 😂