Easy way to make table is that write T for p 8 times and F 8 times... Then write T for q 4 times and F 4 times. Continue the process until 16 entries are done... Then write T for r 2 times and F 2 times. Continue the process until 16 entries are done... Then write T for s 1 times and F 1 times. Continue the process until 16 entries are done...
🙏 i came to this video to see table for 4 proposition and this sir method is way different than mine i get confuse then i see your comment with same method to write true and false. Thank for this solution.
only p and q will be considered here. Therefore, there will be only 4 truth values for p and q. [ (p --> q) ^ q ] --> p Within square brackets are, our premises and following the arrow is out conclusion.
In last question let, p= it is good pen q= it is parker pen from above statement (p-->q)^q---->p now find whether this statement is tautology or not if it is tautology then the given statement is valid otherwise falacy statement👍
Sir , really you have fixed content given fixed time that's wonderful 😊 No waste time ☺️ Sir tommrow my exam M3 me apse whole maths pda hu love you sir ❤️
There is a very simple trick to make 4 variables truth table you have to make 4 rows of 16 columns and in first row you to write 4 true first then 4 false and then repeat this until last column in first row and in second row make it 3 true and 3 false in 3 row make it 2 true and 2 false and in last one make it 1 true and 1 false to the last column and then you have your row
Sur i think you should change your domain name as it is saying math scare 😅 and i think you don't want your student to get scare from this wonderfull and beautiful subject
In wages validity example, why is this so if we take (s) for inflation and then (~s) for no inflation the argument becomes invalid, i think there is problem in your question
Find the validity of the following Argument: (5) If my friend does not come to meet me, then I will go to office. If I go to office, then I will complete my work. Using rules of inference, Can we conclude, "If I am not happy, then I will complete my work?
➡ Incase you missed previous Videos of Discrete Mathematics =
Playlist of Discrete Mathematics - th-cam.com/play/PLU6SqdYcYsfJ27O0dvuMwafS3X8CecqUg.html
Verry helpful you're video 📷
Thanks sir 🍭
[(P-->q)and q] --> p
and this is not valid argument
Right 👍🏻
Easy way to make table is that write T for p 8 times and F 8 times...
Then write T for q 4 times and F 4 times. Continue the process until 16 entries are done...
Then write T for r 2 times and F 2 times. Continue the process until 16 entries are done...
Then write T for s 1 times and F 1 times. Continue the process until 16 entries are done...
🙏 i came to this video to see table for 4 proposition and this sir method is way different than mine i get confuse then i see your comment with same method to write true and false.
Thank for this solution.
@@deepak00singh34 welcome 🤗
THANK U SOLVED MY PRBLM
only p and q will be considered here. Therefore, there will be only 4 truth values for p and q.
[ (p --> q) ^ q ] --> p
Within square brackets are, our premises and following the arrow is out conclusion.
@@FarhanAli-gd2qvI was talking about question 2...
In which there are p, q, r and s
sir aap ka lecture dekh ker mai bsc me.mathamatics me good pertionality develop ki h aap se milker accha lga thankyou sir
Sir last wala question is valid argument hai and it's also a tautology 🎉🎉🔥🔥
The answer to the last question of this video is a false argument,thank you for your teaching sir ❤
Let good pen = p , Parker pen = q
Given statement will be like this
P implies q and q implies conclusion p
If it rain
Ram will be sick
It did not rain
Ram will not be sick.
Ye valid argument hai.
Nhi
{ last solution:-[(p->q)ANDq]->p }
same❤❤
is it valid or not
@@Mridulmishra06 invalid
Realising the benifit of learning logic gates...
0, 1. 😅
Sir please explain Predicate logic also
Milega toh mujhe bhi batana
In last question let, p= it is good pen
q= it is parker pen
from above statement
(p-->q)^q---->p
now find whether this statement is tautology or not if it is tautology then the given statement is valid otherwise falacy statement👍
The answers is valid argument
It's really very helpful for me and all other students. Thank you❤🌹🙏🙏 so much sir, i always pray to God bless you and happy life😊. Thank you🙏
sir the correct ans is " (P->Q)^Q->P" , thank you sir .
Dil khush ho gaya hai sir ji 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Thank you sir
Love from bhopal
aap ki vajhe se aab sayd pass ho jaunga ye module complete
only 4 min but for confirmation it took 6min ,And it is a falacy argument ,it mean not a valid argument
Thank's Sir for such type of content
Only one case is valid
When p,q is T , then
Conclusion (p) is T
And also it is falacy argument
bhai if one case is vslid to falacy kaise....valid to hai ek case prr
please dont use yellow pen
Last question ka answer invalid!
Kese bro ((p->q)^q)->p
Answer is...Valid
@@abhishekrawat7610 yes it's invalid
@@CookingWithRoohiAfaq invalid
Dil kushhh kr ditaaa ❤@@abhishekrawat7610
best study capsule for exam time
Sir , really you have fixed content given fixed time that's wonderful 😊
No waste time ☺️
Sir tommrow my exam M3 me apse whole maths pda hu love you sir ❤️
Homework question is invalid argument
Solveing time 4min 17 sec 😊😊
very good explanation sir
Sir agr kese premises ma b true wala case na ho.... Then kia ans hoga
Thanku sir you made this subject easy as abc
Sir upsc optional ka preparation krwate h kya??
Sir questions 2nd me aapne q→s wale me kuch mistake ho gyi kya, please help me
Last question ka ans. Falacy argument hai 😀 thank you so much sir for this brilliant video ❤️
How??..can u plz tell
@@playwithprogramming7343 Logic = [(p --> q) ^ q] --> p
here, if it's a pen = p.
it's Parker pen = q.
no its a valid arguement
There is a very simple trick to make 4 variables truth table you have to make 4 rows of 16 columns and in first row you to write 4 true first then 4 false and then repeat this until last column in first row and in second row make it 3 true and 3 false in 3 row make it 2 true and 2 false and in last one make it 1 true and 1 false to the last column and then you have your row
without truth table kya ye argument question solve kar sakte hain ?
Awesome 💯
Thank you sir 🙏🙏🙏
sir aap bahut acche ho
Chak de phatte 🔥👑
Recurrence relation pe video bnaiye sir
@20:33 ... Falacy Argument
Do you know if this video is for the gate preparation ??
because I don't make the whole table in the gate exam
Sur i think you should change your domain name as it is saying math scare 😅 and i think you don't want your student to get scare from this wonderfull and beautiful subject
theory of inference,method proofs topics ka bhi video chahiye sir btech ka syllabus main ye hay
Make video on Non-linear Differential Equations of Particular Forms
sir Q4 ka ans falsy argument hoga conditional statement ka truth table to wohi bata raha hain....
Truth table vkesay bnatay hn jo 16 wala ha??
Falacy Argument.
Time 2-3 min
In wages validity example, why is this so if we take (s) for inflation and then (~s) for no inflation the argument becomes invalid, i think there is problem in your question
Thanku sir for the amazing lecture ❤
excellent sir
at 4:00 in Q-1 of the argument, p implies q k baad and kyu use hua..? ( PLEASE EXPLAIN SOMEONE)
Har ek statement khatam hone ke baad use and sai jodte hai..
Sir pls make a series on mechanics pls 🙏🙏🙏
Sr my question is that after premises how we take implies sign before conclusion?
Is there shoud be = sign
either or mein XOR use nhi karna chahiye?
it is valid argument (p->q)^p->q
Yes it is.
T T T T T
T F F F T
F T T T T
F F T F T
Sir please complete the syllabus of m3 🙏🏻🙏🏻
20:19 invalid argument
Thank you so much sir it is very useful for me great explanation....😊
Thank u sir for helpful vedio..!!
Sir helpful in every sem 🫡
4th question ki truth table mein jo 'S' column hai usme ek saath teen operator lage hue hai toh usko kaise solve kiya sir ne?? Please reply
agr teeno m se ek bhi false aya to overall false ho jayega
superb explanation sir!
Sir if there is no true in the table then how can we know that it's Valid or not
Last question ka answer invalid!
Thank you so much sir aapke lecture humare liye bahut helpful hain 🙏🙏🙏🙏📚
invalid thode , bi conditional statement hai
Sir ne predicate ki videos bnai h ?
@@harjeetsangwan7707 yes , Bhai
Tautology bhi ho Raha hai
Statement yehi Hain na
[( p→q) ^ p] → q
@@parthapratimkalita983 tautology nahi ho raha hai recheck karo
@@parthapratimkalita983 [(p->q)^q]->p ye vala correct hai
Thank you for the lecture 🥳🥳
8:47 madous ponus use kro sir
sir predicate logic par video jaldi please
[ (p -> q) ^ q ] -> p
It is a falacy argument time:- 30 sec.
Thnx alot Sir 🥰👍
last questiottn......i thinfk its an valid argument becuase the two premisses as well as the conclusiotn art set tot bbe T (true)
T T F T : Falacy Argument
Hhi uma
U are right
@@suriharshul Harami salya
Gajab Rani kya maal ho tum😮
@@suriharshul shadi karni hai usse😂
thank you Guruji
Sir rules of reference pa b video bna doooo plsssss
argument are valid , 30 seconds sir
the answer is it is a valid argument
(p->q)^q->p ?
The equation looks [(p -> q) n (q -> p) n q] -> p it is valid statement
[(P-->q)and q] --> p
YE HAI BHAI
(P->q)->p
Thankyou sir ❤️❤️
Sir please 1 video argument ko without truth table k tautology proof karne pr or bna dijiye sir usme bahut confusions aa rahe h
Ans= Valid Arguement
Euclidean ring and polynomial ring class please
Super sir 🔥
Ans :- ( p-->q) and q --> p
since it is not tautology thats why it is not valid too.
The ans. To last question is falacy argument.
To make truth table of 16 values just know the concept of hexadecimal 😁😁
Thanks sir
Sir recurrence relation topic upload kar dijiye pls sir
Par ye pqrs ko kayse T F ka arrangement kiya kuch samjha nahi
Ans : not valid.
Sir plz bool's expansion theorem describe kro na
I think in question no 4 there is a small mistake in Truth Table
quantifier kha gya sir
Sir sorry padte padte mai like and comment krna bhul gya 🙏
Very 👍
Find the validity of the following Argument:
(5)
If my friend does not come to meet me, then I will go to office. If I go to office, then I will complete my work.
Using rules of inference, Can we conclude, "If I am not happy, then I will complete
my work?
I am watching this video before my exam that is 1 hour later
Sir gram Schmidt orthogonalization process ka class ki jiye please
Last question ka answer invalid (falacy argument)
this statement is valid
,please sir check the my answer
valid argument