ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2023
- Your support and donations are greatly appreciated!
RobTrek.com/donate
RobTrek.com/coffee
Amazon affiliate links:
*Fujifilm X-H2: amzn.to/3RLBDYB
*Sigma 56mm f/1.4: amzn.to/3PG1cHN
Comparison Images:
flic.kr/s/aHBqjAWEP2
DXO Photography Software Free Trials #ad:
tidd.ly/3iIPltB
My Amazon Store #ad*:
www.amazon.com/shop/robtrek
My eBay Link #ad*:
ebay.to/2DuHOt8
Social:
Instagram: / robtreklens
Facebook: / robtreklens
My Blog: robtrek.com
*We are a participant in the eBay and Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Ebay.com Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
#omsystem #fujifilm #photography
This is the same video as before, but with the audio fixed. You can find the previous version with it's comments intact here:
That is great news to me Rob ! I have been looking for TH-cam content for Fuji X mount cameras since I completed my full switch from MFT to Fuji a year ago and i HOPE you will give Fuji some love as you have done to the MFT system. I`m sure you will find the X-H2 a nice camera. I havent looked back since i made the switch and have tryed different bodies (X-T1, X-T2, X-H1, X-E3 and X-H2) and lenses. When the H2 came out almost a year ago I sold my last MFT and ordered one. PLEASE keep up the tecnical view on cameras, deepdive on functions/menus, "real life" test etc. Ill bee back as a subscriber if there is more Fuji content on the way ;-)
Thank you, Rob, the great review. I’m planning on getting the X-H2 this summer. Can’t wait! 😌
Another thought! Having watched your two videos on low light S-AF and C-AF with the EM1iii and OM1, I was wondering if you have any observations about the low light AF performance of the X-H2. A similar test to that done with the Olympus would, of course, be a big ask!
I like the FOMO concept Rob, I’m sure we can all identify with that and at some point gave way and bought new gear. I have recently done the same but the frustration is I never feel any further forward. As you point out, the output looks pretty much the same.
Rob, another fantastic review. You know, I actually cannot afford any of the cameras or lenses you talk about in the video, but if I were considering buying one and had to choose between the OM and the Fuji, your video would certainly be of great help. Please, keep up the excellent work.
I understand what you wrote me and yes, you are totally right, I am sorry for being too fast with my perception. Many greetings to you and thank you for your reviews and work to all of us, greetings!
That's a beautiful X-H2! I'll never give up my Olympus Cameras, but my next camera will be the Medium format Fujifilm GFX50S II for my home studio.
X-H2 is first Fuji that looks great. Not only parameters, but also the body design is finally there! Similar style to my favourite Pentax DLSR.
Hi. Have you used capture one or Adobe Lightroom to develop images from Fuji? c1 is known to better handle the xtrans.
Thanks Rob for your review. I think that the big difference is between micro 43 and FF and not to APSC format. I remembered when I had the legend nikon D700 I dint worry about going to 6400!iso but with my gx9 and em5 and 10 mark ii the 3200 is the limit.
As a Fuji guy, I recently did something similar but form the other side of the road 😊. I own the X-H2-150/600 combo and I had the chance to try the OM1+150/400 combo in the wild for few hours.Ergonomically speaking I prefer the Fuji (because I’m used to it - I think all bodies need some time to « Feel it »). The custom modes on the Fuji are something to consider seriously - a game changer for me. Back home I could check all photos taken with both systems and (honestly speaking) I was expecting a vow effect from OM because I (still) believe the 150/400 is a best of a lens. But that wasn’t the case. I found all images very noisy (before editing them with DxO) and not sharper than the ones from Fuji. I will try to test the OM system again to be sure I didn’t make something wrong (I was with an OM represent during the test so I assumed the camera was properly configured). Thank Rob for your honest review. By the way, I subscribed to your Flickr account.
Hi Rob, I see you using the 45/1.8. Have you ever used a pro-primelens with focallength 17/25/45? I use the 17/1.2 and can compare it directly with my 17/1.8. Without cropping, I can already see a difference because it is clearer/more contrasty and has that pop effect.
Very useful review. I drove a Fuji XT2 for a year or so and ended up hating the thing, primarily due to the 'traditional controls'. I currently use a pair of Olympus EM1 mk2 bodies with 12-40 f2.8 and 40-150mm f2.8 pro lenses, plus a Panasonic 100-300mm for some sports photography. Noise reduction in DxO Photolab 6 is remarkably good. As I too have small hands, the X-H2 grip could be a deal breaker. I'm also not convinced that I can adequately replace those 2.8 pro lenses with Fuji equivalents. The Olympus 100-400mm is also a real tempter, again with no real competition in the Fuji stable. With weight being a primary concern, I suspect that when the time comes for an upgrade, my money will go on an OM1.
I wonder how you would feel if you got to try the Lumix S5 ii. I went from OM-1 to this, and its kept the hand held and tripod high-res modes IN camera, as well as live composite. All in camera and beautiful. With excellent AF- and you get real time LUT's, so there's the Fuji-vibe. It's a brilliant camera, especially for the price.
If you want to try out a few fuji lenses I have a few ones you'll probably be interested in, in a variety of price points.
Wow Rob what I surprise. No idea you shot Fuji.
Would you like to see OM systems bring out an all new OM-2 with only a 24 or 26 stacked sensor and all new image processor and sharing the same body as the OM-1 If they could only bring out such a camera by early, March 2024.
Hi i have a fujifilm xt1 n image is very good on xt1 then when i shoot on my olympus em10 mark1 n lumix g7 with 14mm f2.5 or the kit lens 14 412mm the images are not as good as xt1 should i keep mft or go with fujifilm
I just sent back the OM-1, I find that OMSytem isn't going on the right slope (and I was a big Oly fan, got my first one in the early 80's). I think that comparing shots between 20 and 40mpix needs to be done at equivalent magnification. The iso 3200-6400 are better on the Fuji and the dynamic is better on the Fuiji that makes sense because it's a larger sensor. The H2 is definitively not a fast camera, the H2S is made for that. 40 mpix are useful for croping and large prints. Also 14 bits raws allow deeper editing that 12bits raw. I have a P1 with old 60mpix CCD with 16 bits raw and the difference is major compared to the OM-1. I've been very disappointed by the OM-1 (I'm not a bird or a sport shooter) and was sad to send it back. As you said 20 mpix is more than enough if you don't need to crop or do large prints. But depending of what you shoot the extra pixels make the difference.