Alchemical Science YT channel just posted a new video interviewing Bob Greenyer. Very inspiring! I love learning science and the history of science/scientists.
Another great topic. I was told by a science enthusiast that I should not be quoting papers that are 10 years old. I rest my case. The Safire project found many transmutations.
There are also various studies (some were US military up until 1979 or so) which found that certain biological lifeforms could generate extra calcium and other elements, using an ATP based complex. The calcium study was done (after intital work) using chickens whose environment and feed was essentially calcium free... but with certain foods that did not contain calcium, but other elements, they were able to generate calcium for their bones and eggs for months, the only calcium present in the experiment was that in the chickens initially.
I tried to get into that channel but I just couldn't, it was so much talk from a point of already known lore I didn't know. So I didn't get what they meant. Do they have a video where this aluminum foil and ultrasonic cleaner is exactly talked about?
@@cajampa you might find the interview of Bob Greenyer helpful in regards to the Martin Fleishmann Memorial Project. It was just released within the last few days on the Alchemical Sciemce YT channel.
When I first saw their Bath conference announcement I thought "these guys are about to come head to head with reality" Not science reality but the crushing reality of trying to confront some seriously powerful business interests.
@@TheBelrick We are finding some writing of the ancient civilizations, because they are carved on stone. Unfortunately our storage is in the "Cloud" we will disappear without a trace!
Since finding out that Westinghouse's original Atom Smasher is just rusting away in a field outside Pittsburgh, and it was just a big van de Graff genny... I think, yeah, our governments', CERN, and particularly the national science foundation have some serious 'assplaining to do.
They dont want you makin your own h-bomb. It is very difficult to imagine what the world would be like if proliferation extended all the way to the individual.
I would so enjoy and benefit from a video by you on how you do your research for a video such as this. Well done. At around @3:35 you showed an image of a data sheet showing spectral lines for the table of elements. This intrigued me as I have never seen such a sheet and seeing all the spectral lines of the elements together, I was struck by the thought that it might be interesting to rearrange the order of the elements by their lines. This has probably already been done. So, if anybody can point me to it, I would appreciate it. There is an argument for low energy transmutation within organisms. And since earth itself is a super organism, I should suspect it is possible, but, we have to look at from a Tesla perspective in understanding the universe, having to do with frequency and vibration. Stan Meyers who was reported back in the 70s to have built a car that ran on water, said that he used a pulsed current through metal rods to disassociate the hydrogen from the water. Unfortunately he died in mysterious circumstances and all his research disappeared, so no one has been able to replicate his work. Funny story. I remember when Stan Meyers was on NBC new back in the late 70s. I was excited about the potential of such a thing and remember looking forward to hearing more, which of course never came until the internet came along.
As technology evolves & we get more efficient ways of generating energy, the cost increases. I think we all need to go back to those really inefficient methods in order to reduce charges.
Fascinating. Fusion is most likely very common and easy to produce, but that doesn't make for good tax slaves if everyone has unlimited virtually free energy
@efdangotu it's actually the other way around, in fact most of the energy comes from the fusions that occur from the byproducts of fission. There's a great book called the nature of the atom by Edwin kaal that goes over all the threshold energies involved.
@@Turbo_TasticI really look forward to seeing any new updates from Mr. Kaal. His structured atom model is fascinating and I hope it gets the recognition it deserves wether it’s an exact description of what’s going on in the nucleus or even if it’s only a tool along the path to understanding the atom.
Anyone who can make a low energy nuclear reactor can also make a fusion trigger... to trigger a runaway fusion reaction. Maybe a person could do it at home, in a garage, using umbiquitous materials, for a few thousand dollars. Imagine a world where the design for this lenr device is shared on the internet and hobbyists around the world begin manufacturing fusion devices for whatever purpose they see fit. Imagine if guys in tunnels under ancient deserts were to build these.
The experiments don't require any exotic materials, why not do those experiments and reproduce the results? I mean it would be better than just doing videos.
RedNile did experiments with a microwave with a camera. He transmutated elements but dismissed the results as he was like most humans, indoctrinated into the standard model of physics and cosmology And of course the saffire project has without a shadow of a doubt proved that it is electro magnetic forces that create new elements.
The problem with transmutation claims is that it is very easy to see results from contamination. Also, regarding Sapphire, I saw a response video from somebody in the field, and he says what the most likely saw in the spectrogram is a combination of common metals used in the experiment. So you can say these kinda of experiments have been going on for nearly 100 years, and we have nothing to show for it. Just ephemeral results that never lead to something more.
Along those lines of unique hydrogen properties, namely, hydrino, see the Mental Boost 2 video recent release, "wtc steel and stone anomalies ancient artifacts." Is this the 21st century or what?
safire the showed us that its possible to use electricity to transmute elements,,,,, now all the LENR labs around the world are working towards power generation and transmutations
How are new neutrons created in all the experiments mentioned in this video? The creation of new neutrons are essential to explain the creation of tritium, deuterium, helium, and the transmutation of heavier atoms, etc .... To create a neutron one needs a heavy electron (2.5 times more mass than the standard electron) that fuses with a proton, so how are heavy electrons created? The electron discharge from a 'cold' cathode with high voltage is possible only by means of Fowler-Nordheim quantum tunneling of the electrons (from the cathode surface to the vacuum). Antony Valentini described in his papers the possibility of NON-EQUILIBRIUM (with respect to the statistical pilot wave background energy, aka ZPE) quantum processes that violate the Born rule of quantum mechanics. Quantum tunneling might be a 'quantum non-equilibrium statistical transport' phenomenon that allows the electron to gain in mass by converting some background ZPE into intrinsic potential energy. According to the classical electromagnetic mass theory, an electron can gain in mass by shrinking (smaller radius of sphere, toroid, ring, whatever), which means that the intrinsic potential electric energy of an electron increases. The electron mass is simply its intrinsic electric potential energy divided by c^2. So the mass increase and shrinking of electrons might happen already during the Fowler Nordheim tunneling 'discharge' (the emission of electrons from a cold cathode into the vacuum). Ken Shoulders also reported on EVO (big electron clusters) that could be explained by the clustering of heavy electrons into a stable state of electron matter (the EVO): heavy electrons are smaller than normal electrons, can approach each other more closely and therefore cluster. When the EVO (heavy electron cluster) collides with solid-state matter, then this matter transmutes into other elements by means of proton heavy-electron fusion, etc. This theory explains many more observations and much more relevant data, with respect to the Widom Larsen theory, which only describes the creation of 'heavy electrons' in a a solid state lattice (hydrated Palladium). According to some researchers, EVOs can absorb many atoms from a gas (hydrogen) or plasma environment, to form bigger ball lightning objects, in which atoms are transmuted into other elements. It has been suggested that the stability of EVOs and Ball Lightning objects is explained by a toroidal configuration of charged particles, with a fractal dimension.
Interesting to read about these, but I'm still dubious as to actual "cold"/low-energy-initiated fusion, because to me there's one very big problem and that's _where are all the gamma rays?_ Regardless of how one is to imagine the reaction circumvents the Coulomb barrier, what is preventing the excited nucleus from decaying to its ground state _via the emission of a gamma ray?_ Why is it not giving off that energy that way?
Geometry… Its shape is self sustaining. The classic ouroboros shape or twisted, the infinity ♾️ symbol . Imagine a plasma torus Made of tori Made of tori At least four times. Plasma has three modalities right, dark, glow and arc modes, if it’s visible it should be non ionizing. Eventually it stacks on itself, forming layers. 🧅 Similar to how we think of valence electron shells. Because there is no nuclei decay there should be no gamma rays. Beta rays will be an issue but that is easily solved with aluminum. The dipole moment(s) continually point inward towards a stable rotation.
Experimentalists at the turn of the 19th century would have a difficult time detecting neutron emissions. They could find a way to detect gamma rays, but only if they expected to see them from the experiment.
I wish Musk would find his way to the LENR research. We would have cold fusion plants popping up everywhere in 10 years. LENR is no joke, but it gets totally disrespected because of physicists who are not creative thinkers. Incidentally, I have a biotech degree and I have long believed the work to develop cold fusion lies in fusion catalysts just like any other chemical catalyst. LENR is just the beginning of the research into these catalysts. If we could transfer the money going into hot fusion and put it in LENS, we would not have these constant unfulfilled promises of "in 20 years we will have hot fusion". There is enough evidence to pump real money into this research, so why doesn't it happen?!
you know the big bang thinkers and orthodox cosmology without lerner's presence is making them lose their professorial status or rather reputation and money
facts are: China is already far ahead in LENR Transmutation technological applications used in both cleaner greener sustainable Nuclear Fission Powerplants, and Fusion Powerplants (addresses long-lived radioactive nuclear fuel waste, converted to shorter-lived radioactive nuclear waste; which the WEST only talks about, but does NOTHING about) Musk likely knows China is far ahead (farther ahead than Russia, or Ukraine) in commercial industrial applications for LENR Transmutation tech so, Musk is unlikely to compete with China, given USA/West's lagginess in this area it's the USA/West's own greedy fault for hindering research and development in this area, just to protect the absurd profitability in least efficient technologies, at everyone else's expense if super-benevolent alien interdimensional beings came to earth, and gave USA/West the cure for cancer, pain, and death, and getting old, they would horde it, squat on it, for as long as possible, to better profit on preying on those in need, at unnecessary exorbitant prices
It's all very simple actually. All atoms are the same. It's only the charge that is different and that charge is what we call elements. In these experiments it would never be possible to remove all the lowest charge type atom hydrogen, because they are created when atoms with higher charge is bombarded with energy and those atoms radiate away the energy in the form of hydrogen. Some of energy goes deeper inside the lattice and creates heavier element, some energy is just radiated away to other atoms in the line of sight and some loose all their charge and decouple from the lattice as hydrogen that, can't bond with the lattice. So, you can remove 100% of hydrogen from the flask/vial containing the lattice element. But as soon as you ad a charge, hydrogen will form as will an very tiny amount of an heavier element. Atoms don't have any particles or nucleus. They only contain a counter space, and that counter space is causing gravity. The heavier the element the higher the gravity due to the energy build up in the atom. If our planet didn't have an atmosphere the suns energy would just radiate away like on the moon. The earth is constantly expanding while the moon is shrinking. This expansion is the reason for earth continental plate tectonics. Those movements bring heavy elements to the surface. On the moons surface, they will never find any really heavy elements. On Venus there will be a lot on the surface. This is also why the sun seems to be made of hydrogen, but are in fact just a planet that is liquid and radiates a lot of hydrogen and energy. Atoms can't be split or fused. This is just mathematic nonsens dreamed up by monotheistc scientists slowing down progress to maintain their power base and create endless profit.
@@bentuovila5296 Gravity cause friction, the same as on Earth. Only the sun is like a constant volcanic eruption. When a planet pass a certain mass, the surface will become liquid and it will start to radiate a lot. Some planets shifts in and out of this stage and this is why we see some stars disappear and turn on.
I like this idea. How did you come to this conclusion? The question then is how do the elements get their 'properties'. What is also a question is about the 'shape' / 'construction' of the electron and proton (H) and the rest of the elements nuclei. Is it an energy (EM) torus with a kind of standing wave keeping all the energy in the electron / proton? These are relevant questions because the EVO's / charged clusters / Ball lightning are build op of matter and energy in a torus model. The MFMP (Bob Greenyer) has found reasonable proof of the torus structures of these charged clusters. It is thus also reasonable that the atom model and the charged cluster model are constructed is similar ways (as nature does all the time).
Thank you. You may add to your good work by seeing what Bob Greenyer has been saying. Best wishes.
Alchemical Science YT channel just posted a new video interviewing Bob Greenyer. Very inspiring! I love learning science and the history of science/scientists.
Excellent work. There's lots of high-quality research packed into this short video.
A great walk through science and history. Thank you for a well-researched video. I look forward to each of the videos that you make.
Ditto! I envy those who havent watched the older videos from this channel over and over. Im always stoked for new ones.
I second that motion👏
Another great topic. I was told by a science enthusiast that I should not be quoting papers that are 10 years old. I rest my case. The Safire project found many transmutations.
There are also various studies (some were US military up until 1979 or so) which found that certain biological lifeforms could generate extra calcium and other elements, using an ATP based complex. The calcium study was done (after intital work) using chickens whose environment and feed was essentially calcium free... but with certain foods that did not contain calcium, but other elements, they were able to generate calcium for their bones and eggs for months, the only calcium present in the experiment was that in the chickens initially.
This channel has a great set of videos about transmutation! Check the playlists!
Does the farmer just say feed a little styrofoam
The Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project has solved this puzzle. Anyone can do this at home with aluminum foil in an ultrasonic cleaner.
I tried to get into that channel but I just couldn't, it was so much talk from a point of already known lore I didn't know.
So I didn't get what they meant.
Do they have a video where this aluminum foil and ultrasonic cleaner is exactly talked about?
Hello. You said it so I don't have to. Thanks Aedonius. Code word: RELENTLESS.
MFMP 💚
@@cajampa you might find the interview of Bob Greenyer helpful in regards to the Martin Fleishmann Memorial Project. It was just released within the last few days on the Alchemical Sciemce YT channel.
@@cajampa see his ULTR playlist
was hoping for a segue to the transmutation discoveries from Safire, and an explanation of what these older scientists were actually seeing.
I predict the gov is going to swoop in and snatch that tech.
@@maximvsdread1610 They may not need to. They just need to delay as this Age is ending along with the global civilization. Again.
@TheBelrick yes. The star of remphan ✡️ falls.
When I first saw their Bath conference announcement I thought "these guys are about to come head to head with reality" Not science reality but the crushing reality of trying to confront some seriously powerful business interests.
@@TheBelrick We are finding some writing of the ancient civilizations, because they are carved on stone. Unfortunately our storage is in the "Cloud" we will disappear without a trace!
Great episode! I'd love more of these historical research results put back into modern context.
Interesting topic, enjoyed this video, thanks.
the apparatus used by Collie , Patterson and Masson reminded me of the superfluid setup for Helium4 as it has vacuum jackets as well
Since finding out that Westinghouse's original Atom Smasher is just rusting away in a field outside Pittsburgh, and it was just a big van de Graff genny... I think, yeah, our governments', CERN, and particularly the national science foundation have some serious 'assplaining to do.
They dont want you makin your own h-bomb.
It is very difficult to imagine what the world would be like if proliferation extended all the way to the individual.
your comment about the electrical properties of hydrogen and how it might impact electric universe theories is interesting.
Holy Crap he dropped a new bomb. Love it. Welcome back!
Gtsy
I would so enjoy and benefit from a video by you on how you do your research for a video such as this. Well done.
At around @3:35 you showed an image of a data sheet showing spectral lines for the table of elements. This intrigued me as I have never seen such a sheet and seeing all the spectral lines of the elements together, I was struck by the thought that it might be interesting to rearrange the order of the elements by their lines. This has probably already been done. So, if anybody can point me to it, I would appreciate it.
There is an argument for low energy transmutation within organisms. And since earth itself is a super organism, I should suspect it is possible, but, we have to look at from a Tesla perspective in understanding the universe, having to do with frequency and vibration. Stan Meyers who was reported back in the 70s to have built a car that ran on water, said that he used a pulsed current through metal rods to disassociate the hydrogen from the water. Unfortunately he died in mysterious circumstances and all his research disappeared, so no one has been able to replicate his work. Funny story. I remember when Stan Meyers was on NBC new back in the late 70s. I was excited about the potential of such a thing and remember looking forward to hearing more, which of course never came until the internet came along.
Thanks
Keep 'em coming! It's very important what you're doing for the scientific community!
The recent videos on cold fusion by BobbyBroccoli are required watching for anybody interested in this subject. A very interesting tale.
Thank you for this fine work.
I believe it may be possible for transmutation to occur in metals
where copper is converted to nickel using cavitation.
As technology evolves & we get more efficient ways of generating energy, the cost increases. I think we all need to go back to those really inefficient methods in order to reduce charges.
Fascinating. Fusion is most likely very common and easy to produce, but that doesn't make for good tax slaves if everyone has unlimited virtually free energy
It seems logical to me that fusion cannot produce a net energy release, but fission can.
The real advance is applying transmutation for industry.
@efdangotu it's actually the other way around, in fact most of the energy comes from the fusions that occur from the byproducts of fission. There's a great book called the nature of the atom by Edwin kaal that goes over all the threshold energies involved.
@@Turbo_TasticI really look forward to seeing any new updates from Mr. Kaal. His structured atom model is fascinating and I hope it gets the recognition it deserves wether it’s an exact description of what’s going on in the nucleus or even if it’s only a tool along the path to understanding the atom.
Anyone who can make a low energy nuclear reactor can also make a fusion trigger... to trigger a runaway fusion reaction. Maybe a person could do it at home, in a garage, using umbiquitous materials, for a few thousand dollars. Imagine a world where the design for this lenr device is shared on the internet and hobbyists around the world begin manufacturing fusion devices for whatever purpose they see fit.
Imagine if guys in tunnels under ancient deserts were to build these.
@emrysmcwryn7902 imagine if the Saffire team wasn't compromised by DARPA.. we'd all be buying Mr fusions at home Depot
The experiments don't require any exotic materials, why not do those experiments and reproduce the results? I mean it would be better than just doing videos.
Epic find! Thank you for this great video.
RedNile did experiments with a microwave with a camera. He transmutated elements but dismissed the results as he was like most humans, indoctrinated into the standard model of physics and cosmology
And of course the saffire project has without a shadow of a doubt proved that it is electro magnetic forces that create new elements.
There are too many people who believe in bbt on many channels even though jswt Dan exposed that model😢
The problem with transmutation claims is that it is very easy to see results from contamination. Also, regarding Sapphire, I saw a response video from somebody in the field, and he says what the most likely saw in the spectrogram is a combination of common metals used in the experiment.
So you can say these kinda of experiments have been going on for nearly 100 years, and we have nothing to show for it. Just ephemeral results that never lead to something more.
@@ThienLuu-n3i Hubble ST destroyed the BBT . There are forces at work to keep humans from understanding reality.
@@chrimony Hi Agent Smith, are you working out of Langley or Tel Aviv?
@@TheBelrick I'm in your attic.
Ever Excellent. Until next time 🤗⚡⚡⚡🙏💜🙏⚡⚡⚡
Electric discharge in a proton plasma could create turbulent conditions in which dense magnetic field regions would be enough to cause fusion.
Oh the receipts. I'm in lover
Along those lines of unique hydrogen properties, namely, hydrino, see the Mental Boost 2 video recent release, "wtc steel and stone anomalies ancient artifacts." Is this the 21st century or what?
Exotic vacuum objects
This is the way
RIP Ken Shoulders. Will anyone stand on them Shoulders? Yes, Bob Greenyer explains. Let's go: Power For People.
safire the showed us that its possible to use electricity to transmute elements,,,,, now all the LENR labs around the world are working towards power generation and transmutations
How are new neutrons created in all the experiments mentioned in this video? The creation of new neutrons are essential to explain the creation of tritium, deuterium, helium, and the transmutation of heavier atoms, etc .... To create a neutron one needs a heavy electron (2.5 times more mass than the standard electron) that fuses with a proton, so how are heavy electrons created? The electron discharge from a 'cold' cathode with high voltage is possible only by means of Fowler-Nordheim quantum tunneling of the electrons (from the cathode surface to the vacuum). Antony Valentini described in his papers the possibility of NON-EQUILIBRIUM (with respect to the statistical pilot wave background energy, aka ZPE) quantum processes that violate the Born rule of quantum mechanics. Quantum tunneling might be a 'quantum non-equilibrium statistical transport' phenomenon that allows the electron to gain in mass by converting some background ZPE into intrinsic potential energy. According to the classical electromagnetic mass theory, an electron can gain in mass by shrinking (smaller radius of sphere, toroid, ring, whatever), which means that the intrinsic potential electric energy of an electron increases. The electron mass is simply its intrinsic electric potential energy divided by c^2. So the mass increase and shrinking of electrons might happen already during the Fowler Nordheim tunneling 'discharge' (the emission of electrons from a cold cathode into the vacuum). Ken Shoulders also reported on EVO (big electron clusters) that could be explained by the clustering of heavy electrons into a stable state of electron matter (the EVO): heavy electrons are smaller than normal electrons, can approach each other more closely and therefore cluster. When the EVO (heavy electron cluster) collides with solid-state matter, then this matter transmutes into other elements by means of proton heavy-electron fusion, etc. This theory explains many more observations and much more relevant data, with respect to the Widom Larsen theory, which only describes the creation of 'heavy electrons' in a a solid state lattice (hydrated Palladium). According to some researchers, EVOs can absorb many atoms from a gas (hydrogen) or plasma environment, to form bigger ball lightning objects, in which atoms are transmuted into other elements. It has been suggested that the stability of EVOs and Ball Lightning objects is explained by a toroidal configuration of charged particles, with a fractal dimension.
Interesting to read about these, but I'm still dubious as to actual "cold"/low-energy-initiated fusion, because to me there's one very big problem and that's _where are all the gamma rays?_ Regardless of how one is to imagine the reaction circumvents the Coulomb barrier, what is preventing the excited nucleus from decaying to its ground state _via the emission of a gamma ray?_ Why is it not giving off that energy that way?
Geometry…
Its shape is self sustaining.
The classic ouroboros shape or twisted, the infinity ♾️ symbol .
Imagine a plasma torus
Made of tori
Made of tori
At least four times.
Plasma has three modalities right, dark, glow and arc modes, if it’s visible it should be non ionizing.
Eventually it stacks on itself, forming layers. 🧅
Similar to how we think of valence electron shells.
Because there is no nuclei decay there should be no gamma rays.
Beta rays will be an issue but that is easily solved with aluminum.
The dipole moment(s) continually point inward towards a stable rotation.
Experimentalists at the turn of the 19th century would have a difficult time detecting neutron emissions. They could find a way to detect gamma rays, but only if they expected to see them from the experiment.
Thunderstorm generator... Have a search...
いつも通り素晴らしいコンテンツ！ 関連していないことですが、助けてもらえますか？ USDTを含むSafePalウォレットを持っていて、シードフレーズを持っています. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). それらをBinanceに転送するためにはどうすればよいですか？
I wish Musk would find his way to the LENR research. We would have cold fusion plants popping up everywhere in 10 years. LENR is no joke, but it gets totally disrespected because of physicists who are not creative thinkers. Incidentally, I have a biotech degree and I have long believed the work to develop cold fusion lies in fusion catalysts just like any other chemical catalyst. LENR is just the beginning of the research into these catalysts. If we could transfer the money going into hot fusion and put it in LENS, we would not have these constant unfulfilled promises of "in 20 years we will have hot fusion". There is enough evidence to pump real money into this research, so why doesn't it happen?!
you know the big bang thinkers and orthodox cosmology without lerner's presence is making them lose their professorial status or rather reputation and money
facts are:
China is already far ahead in LENR Transmutation technological applications used in both cleaner greener sustainable Nuclear Fission Powerplants, and Fusion Powerplants (addresses long-lived radioactive nuclear fuel waste, converted to shorter-lived radioactive nuclear waste; which the WEST only talks about, but does NOTHING about)
Musk likely knows China is far ahead (farther ahead than Russia, or Ukraine) in commercial industrial applications for LENR Transmutation tech
so, Musk is unlikely to compete with China, given USA/West's lagginess in this area
it's the USA/West's own greedy fault for hindering research and development in this area, just to protect the absurd profitability in least efficient technologies, at everyone else's expense
if super-benevolent alien interdimensional beings came to earth, and gave USA/West the cure for cancer, pain, and death, and getting old, they would horde it, squat on it, for as long as possible, to better profit on preying on those in need, at unnecessary exorbitant prices
This channel crushes Joe Rogan
True
Both channels have entirely different scopes for their content. Can’t really compare the two.
Liking one over the other is subjective and fine.
Good lerner and wal đi goat EU
It's all very simple actually. All atoms are the same. It's only the charge that is different and that charge is what we call elements. In these experiments it would never be possible to remove all the lowest charge type atom hydrogen, because they are created when atoms with higher charge is bombarded with energy and those atoms radiate away the energy in the form of hydrogen. Some of energy goes deeper inside the lattice and creates heavier element, some energy is just radiated away to other atoms in the line of sight and some loose all their charge and decouple from the lattice as hydrogen that, can't bond with the lattice. So, you can remove 100% of hydrogen from the flask/vial containing the lattice element. But as soon as you ad a charge, hydrogen will form as will an very tiny amount of an heavier element. Atoms don't have any particles or nucleus. They only contain a counter space, and that counter space is causing gravity. The heavier the element the higher the gravity due to the energy build up in the atom. If our planet didn't have an atmosphere the suns energy would just radiate away like on the moon. The earth is constantly expanding while the moon is shrinking. This expansion is the reason for earth continental plate tectonics. Those movements bring heavy elements to the surface. On the moons surface, they will never find any really heavy elements.
On Venus there will be a lot on the surface.
This is also why the sun seems to be made of hydrogen, but are in fact just a planet that is liquid and radiates a lot of hydrogen and energy.
Atoms can't be split or fused. This is just mathematic nonsens dreamed up by monotheistc scientists slowing down progress to maintain their power base and create endless profit.
In this model where does the energy for the sun come from?
@@bentuovila5296 Gravity cause friction, the same as on Earth. Only the sun is like a constant volcanic eruption. When a planet pass a certain mass, the surface will become liquid and it will start to radiate a lot. Some planets shifts in and out of this stage and this is why we see some stars disappear and turn on.
I like this idea. How did you come to this conclusion? The question then is how do the elements get their 'properties'. What is also a question is about the 'shape' / 'construction' of the electron and proton (H) and the rest of the elements nuclei. Is it an energy (EM) torus with a kind of standing wave keeping all the energy in the electron / proton? These are relevant questions because the EVO's / charged clusters / Ball lightning are build op of matter and energy in a torus model. The MFMP (Bob Greenyer) has found reasonable proof of the torus structures of these charged clusters. It is thus also reasonable that the atom model and the charged cluster model are constructed is similar ways (as nature does all the time).
あなたは素晴らしい仕事をしています！ 関連していないことですが、助けてもらえますか？ 私のOKXウォレットにはUSDTが含まれており、シードフレーズを持っています. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). それらをBinanceに転送するためにはどうすればよいですか？
Umm this is all BS. What a BS channel, blocked.
Bye Felicia
Interesting. I didn't realize that was an option.😱