Where is Ravana's Lanka as mentioned in Valmiki Ramayan? ;

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024
  • Please watch this video to learn interesting insights from this fascinating discussion between Dr M L Raja & Aditya Satsangi.
    Book by Aditya Satsangi 'One Arrow, One Kill' Links:
    India (Kindle): www.amazon.in/...
    USA (Print): www.amazon.com...
    UK (Print): www.amazon.co....
    Canada (Print): www.amazon.ca/...
    Urgent Appeal: Subscribe to Sattology & Don't forget to press THE BELL ICON to never miss any updates
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Sattology means science of truth. Sattology is an antonym of Mythology. Search our books on Sattology on Amazon.
    Become a member of Sattology TH-cam channel to become an active community member, be featured on videos, join live and be Called out ! : / @sattology
    For Exclusive content, please support our channel on Patreon: / sattology
    Find all Sattology books at : www.amazon.in/...
    Follow us on Social Media:
    Facebook: sattology
    Twitter: sattology
    Gab: gab.com/sattology
    Rumble: rumble.com/c/c...

ความคิดเห็น • 79

  • @4z4d
    @4z4d 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    ML Raja, Nilesh oak, Vedveer Arya, Rupa Bhaty, Manish Pandit all doing great works.

  • @aroonakalita8892
    @aroonakalita8892 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This was great episode, the host -shri Aditya Satsangi is very wise and brilliant. Still waiting ahead into time..... Thanks Sattology

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      www.amazon.in/dp/B0936SR22S

  • @satyanarayanags8577
    @satyanarayanags8577 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This was an extremely educative video based on scientific and astronomical facts.

  • @mareechike
    @mareechike 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Aditya ji , please make a debate show with Nilesh ji and Dr. Raja . It would be wonderful and very knowledgeable.

  • @ramrave2913
    @ramrave2913 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Dr ML Raja, and Nilesh Oakji should debate on dates/location of Lanka.Dr Raja come up with date, to prove with scientific evidence ,finding correct location of lanka would help as sea levels changes with ice age, earth quakes etc.

  • @srividhyavs3685
    @srividhyavs3685 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Chakravala Giri, roughly translated, Circular Mountain chain, is mentioned in Ramayana.Oceanographers have mapped more than 10,000 seamounts in Pacific, Indian and Atlantic oceans. I am sure one of these was close to or in Lankapuri

  • @khtsh
    @khtsh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    We now definately believe
    Ramayan
    Mahabharat
    Is our *History*

  • @4z4d
    @4z4d 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Please also call Saroj Bala ji. She has written books on Ramaya and Mahabharat (Garuda Prakashan)

  • @anirudha8680
    @anirudha8680 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If we consider ramayana as 14k years ago, indian land mass would be more southern. So 1 yojana would be shorter than 9km and still be at equator? If we consider 36mm/yr, it comes to around 500km south. So 1 yojana would be around 4km at equator

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      www.amazon.in/dp/B0936SR22S

  • @nilotpalsarmahsarma8344
    @nilotpalsarmahsarma8344 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ramayan, Mahabharat is our History

    • @swordswam
      @swordswam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not history, it is our present and will be our future too. Ram and Krishna is within every Hindu and is part of our genes.

  • @jaideeph6985
    @jaideeph6985 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great Episode Adityaji , and thanks to Dr. Raja sir too for discussing his opinion on placement of Lanka.
    Adiyaji , can you refer me the book of your Ramayana plz ?

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      www.amazon.in/dp/B0936SR22S/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_awdb_BYHRM674EZXC565C6138

  • @amitdixit2362
    @amitdixit2362 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    🙏🕉️ हर हर महादेव 🕉️🙏

  • @svs9371
    @svs9371 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Superb

  • @change9929
    @change9929 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you want to find ayodhya,lanka,etc.follow the legend.

  • @enhaa784
    @enhaa784 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🎉

  • @rajagopalsnp
    @rajagopalsnp หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whataboutkumarikandamintheperiodoframayana

  • @beinggoodhuman846
    @beinggoodhuman846 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Actually there wasnt any bridge made .because Rameswaram to Srilanka is not too far also we are talking about thousand years ago when sea levels were very less . So the entire discussion is waste of time if current sri lanka is the actual Lanka because it is clearly false

  • @aparnasharma3636
    @aparnasharma3636 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🙏🙏🙏

  • @rajwarnakulasuriya5935
    @rajwarnakulasuriya5935 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder, the word you mentioned as 'SIMHALA AND LANKA' should be mentioned as 'SINGHALA AND LANKA'.... Singhala or SINHALA is the language of the Lankan's, That is a unique language, all lankans were known as 'SINHALAYO'. By the way when Dr M L Raja visited Nuwara Eliya (this means Bright City) he should have asked the locals to take him to see' Rawana's cave'... where Rawana kept Seetha, only very few people in our country has gone to see the cave, inside the cave going down few floors is where his palace was and even today if you are to go there, you can see the area size of a football pitch and a stream runs next to that, and there is also a helipad like area where he was supposed to have kept his flying machine.... when you do research, it's good to visit these places and see, sometimes you might be able to fill the missing pieces of the puzzle.

  • @Kleemkrom
    @Kleemkrom 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dr ML Raju compared Ramayan measures Today point of view. Very illogical.

  • @seechurnanoopsharma8159
    @seechurnanoopsharma8159 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But where is the gold kingdom of ravan in sri lanka.

  • @themvp3447
    @themvp3447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I do not think that Sri Lanka of today is Lanka of Ramayana because 1st the longitude from kurukshetra to Ujjain passes from Maldives and not Sri Lanka. 2nd, the original name of sri Lanka of today was Sinhal dweep because it is inhabited by the Sinhalese people till today.

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      www.amazon.in/dp/B0936SR22S

  • @aamod7696
    @aamod7696 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    with all due respect his research presentation looks like based on local legends believes and western studies more than original books and archeological & other evidences. his calculations of Yojanas is also not conclusive. that's why Mr. Nilesh Oak's research is more believable about anything.
    He didn't mentions the sea levels at that time and other evidences witch are given by Mr. Nilesh Oak.
    this is my humble opinion..

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      www.amazon.com/dp/B09328NP92

  • @kishorekrishna490
    @kishorekrishna490 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very clear explanation - excellent and crisp👏👏👌👌 The evidence from Sri Lanka portion appears to be the recall of local beliefs - are there any inscriptions/ literary evidence from Sri Lanka similar to the Velanjery plates?

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well said: www.amazon.in/dp/B0936SR22S

  • @bilsbh1686
    @bilsbh1686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why don't you upload vdo in hindi?

    • @dhanrajagrawal
      @dhanrajagrawal 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because speaking in English language means they are intelligent and intellectual people, and so are feel to talk any nonsense, concoluding by themselves and stating "that prove".

    • @neelamthakur3716
      @neelamthakur3716 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dhanrajagrawal जी आपको शायद पता नही है कि सत्तोलोजी के ये टॉक USA में live होते हैं। लाइव ऑडियंस आती है। उसके कुछ दिन बाद यूट्यूब पर आते हैं। अब अमेरिकन ऑडियंस से हिंदी में बात नही कर सकते। इस चैनल पर हिंदी में भी टॉक हैं उन्हें देखिए फिर मन बनाइये की क्या कमेंट करना।

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      so many videos are in hindi. Your comments are in english !

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      कृपया हिंदी में कॉमेंट लिखें

  • @swordswam
    @swordswam 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I humbly disagree with prof, as 16000 years ago sambala desha and bharata were one piece of land, why build the bridge then.

  • @snygarg8539
    @snygarg8539 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ये सबसे बड़ी कमी है कि सनातन को मानने वाले अंग्रेजी में बात करते हैं

    • @snygarg8539
      @snygarg8539 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @अभिजीत वि.(Abhijeet V.)सर जी तो फिर इसे विडम्बना ही कहेंगे कि हम दोतरफा हो रहे हैं।
      सनातन का प्रचार करना चाहते हैं पर माध्यम अंग्रेजी है।
      हम अंग्रेजी बोल कर अंग्रेजी कर अंग्रेजी भाषा का प्रयोग न करने के लिए कैसे कह सकते हैं।80 करोड़ देश के हिंदुओं की जगह विदेशी हिन्दुओ को जागृत कैसे करेंगे

  • @hemantthakre7239
    @hemantthakre7239 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Was hanuman a monkey or a human or half human and half monkey.If he was a monkey how could he speak in Sanskrit language.Vali and Sugreeva had lady wives.How is that.

  • @palakgupta600
    @palakgupta600 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In short where is original LANKA OF RAMAYAN???

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Accurately mentioned in this book: twitter.com/sattology/status/1385325377183117314?s=21

  • @rajshekhar1147
    @rajshekhar1147 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In many places Sita states that Ram n Laxmana bring meat of various animals for cooking.

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Never. Read here: www.amazon.com/dp/B09328NP92

  • @enhaa784
    @enhaa784 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    .

  • @ketakinikini
    @ketakinikini 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Not at all convincing. He does not take into account the times of Ramayana. At that time Srilankan land mass was joined to India. The sea level was lot lower than what it is today. About Yojana:- Ancient Indians knew their maths and integers well enough to calculate the distance of sun. The diameter of earth even the distance of the moon. I don't think they would be that dumb to state that Hanumanji jumped from mahendra giri in south western direction to reach Ravana's Lanka. The equator and the NIR line was from Surya Shiddanta which perfectly calculates the degree of inclination of Earth. In all I am sorry to say this was more of a bullshit.

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      www.amazon.in/dp/B0936SR22S

    • @allandnothing5987
      @allandnothing5987 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are also purely concluding based on assumptions and on the basis of software that is far from perfect. Dr Raja has presented very formidable evidence here, it is not just heresay but correlation of various sources. It's insane to think the bridge would be 80 kms wide and 800 kms in length. Sometimes commin sense is proof enough.

    • @isuzuikamaki5477
      @isuzuikamaki5477 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@allandnothing5987 You'd think it is equally insane for ppl to be 25-28 feet tall. But ppl were indeed that tall in Treta Yug!.

    • @isuzuikamaki5477
      @isuzuikamaki5477 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And Bharat's southern tip was far more south than today. So distance from equator would be less then, probably 500kms abt. And for ppl with some 12 feet long legs and that strength, it was not an impossible task to build and walk that distance. We are not talking about ordinary common men here.

  • @svariar
    @svariar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    lanka is the island not the capital city........land area of lanka is that of the entire nation

  • @luckystar4767
    @luckystar4767 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Luv Kush were never in original valmiki Ramayana, plz check that is all added up by britishers

    • @dhanrajagrawal
      @dhanrajagrawal 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He is taking all nonsense, and that too in English.

    • @hindurebel
      @hindurebel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @ADITYA & SHIV it is a later interpolation. Original Valmiki Ramayana ended with Pattabhishekam of Rama.

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      www.amazon.in/dp/B0936SR22S

    • @atharvthorat3827
      @atharvthorat3827 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The uttar kand wasn't in orignal Ramyana but it was added not by the British but it was added in the Gupta era

    • @atharvthorat3827
      @atharvthorat3827 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @ADITYA & SHIV but it was never a part of the original story by valmiki and also the original ballad from which he wrote the story.

  • @dhanrajagrawal
    @dhanrajagrawal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Speaking all this in English doesn't means u guys doing extraordinary. if u have to talk on such topic speak in Hindi. Using English language to describe India's Mahabharata and Ramayan is stupidity not intellectual.

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      How many hindi lectures have you heard on this channel ? After you hear them, then comment please.

    • @drbharatj
      @drbharatj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For a South Indian Hindi is not their language. Our great musicians A R Rrhman left the show when the anchor spoke in Hindi. They feel superior speaking in English.

    • @drbharatj
      @drbharatj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In Thailand there's a place called Ayudhaya also there's Lankavi. The king of Thailand is Rama. They have Rama 1 , 2 3 4 and so on. Any connection between this Ram and Valmiki Ram.?????

    • @hindurebel
      @hindurebel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@drbharatj nope. Thailand was part of ancient Bharat. Rama was seen as the perfect King so they modelled their kings after Rama. Ayutthaya was named in 1300s by their King U Thong.

    • @hindurebel
      @hindurebel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Most modern Indians speak English , not everyone knows hindi. If video is done on Hindi, Indians outside of Hindi speaking won't watch.

  • @enhaa784
    @enhaa784 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    .

  • @enhaa784
    @enhaa784 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    .

  • @enhaa784
    @enhaa784 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    .

  • @enhaa784
    @enhaa784 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    .

  • @enhaa784
    @enhaa784 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    .

  • @enhaa784
    @enhaa784 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    .

  • @enhaa784
    @enhaa784 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    .