@@joelpasma543 In the Church of England, the mother church of the Anglican Communion, 33%, or one third, of all "ministers" in "ordained ministry" are females. That is a significant minority. It isn't just some isolated phenomenon you see on social media, it's a very large presence in the real world.
@@Nieden-Pilled that is only the truth in Anglicanism since some time in the 1970’s. While I do agree that it is prolific in the modern mainline Anglican traditions, I would argue that it is not in line with the traditional and orthodox teachings of the Anglican Church to have female “ministers”
@@joelpasma543 I mean no, I wouldn't claim that having female ministers is in line with traditional anglicanism. However, the fact that an overwhelming majority of anglicans fall into one of two churches that have a significant proportion of female priests means that anglicanism, as a whole, has defected from any semblance of Christian orthodoxy.
@@Anglochog1 How? The only reason the Church of England exists at all is because King Henry VIII was mad that the Pope didn't allow him to divorce his wife so he could marry his mistress. If the King didn't have a tantrum, the English church would still be Catholic today - in more ways than one.
@@SanctusPaulus1962 This is a tremendously simplistic reading of history. There are times when reductionist readings may be helpful for contextualisation, but to stand so firmly upon, and debate so passionately with so an unnuanced reading is unhelpful. The "only reason" the Church of England exists is certainly not because of the annulment of Henry VIII's marriage. I strongly encourage you to read more about the English Reformation and the role such characters as Cranmer, Ridley, and Latimer played therein. England, like the rest of the world, was profoundly influenced by the shifting tides of the Protestant Reformation. We must realise, however, that reformation was not "caused" by Dr. Luther, as many had been calling and longing for reform for some time (see for example Jan Huss), but his provocations and the subsequent consequences acted as a flash in the theological musket pan. Similarly, the annulment of marriage in England was not the "only reason" for England breaking away from Rome as you claim, but rather a political opportunity to institute doctrinal realignment which was already desired - as we can clearly see by the fact that the post-annulment CoE started crafting an identity separate from Rome. This was not just a different form of Avignon with Henry VIII being declared, somehow, rightfully the Pope, with a copy cat Roman church being established beneath him. The subsequent history of the Church of England is fascinating, and its switching between being Protestant and Catholic served as a painful and bloody crucible to cast the via media we now know and love. The claim of the Anglican tradition being the "purest form of Christianity" is based upon this: it reformed, without throwing the proverbial catholic baby out with the bathwater; so that it maintained the richness and beauty of historical Christian Tradition, remaining sensitive to mystical truths, yet also submitting to the positive influences of protestant intellectualism. By nature of the forum, this response is also reductionist and brief, but I hope - and pray - that it may in some way have excited your sensibilities to the nuances of church history, and that you may continue to be a student of how God's promise plays out "I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."
@@SanctusPaulus1962 Truly, I simply cannot understand being proud of the Lutheran or Anglican tradition. Both relevant reformers, Henry VIII and Luther, at first weren't even trying to form their own churches, they were just so prideful that they couldn't submit to the Chair of St Peter. Notice how the holiest of anglicans/lutherans usually only love the parts of their faith that are directly taken from the Catholic Church?
It may not mean much to you because of your ecclesiology, Zoomer, but some of us believe submitting to a liberal (heretical) Bishop would be to probably forfeit our salvation (or at least greatly wound our selves spiritually).
Anglicans got it from somewhere. In fact, Anglicans used to believe in the Eucharist until modern times that’s is until the 18th or 19th century or so. But they were very similar except in papal authority. Unfortunately they went super liberal now and abandoned all tradition.
@@nickd7568 Only the liberal party has done so. I am personally under an extremely conservative bishop and our diocese and province is not in communion with any women clergy. We are not alone by any means either. We are holding out, God willing the Anglican Church will regain the historic Sees for orthodoxy.
Where are the transgender priests? Where are the female bishops? Where is the Archbishop of Canterbury who recently said that gay sex is okay if it's in a committed relationship?
The Church of England is in a bad state, and I know Rome is going through some issues of its own right now, but I believe all Anglicans should really look into the Personal Ordinariate, preserved Anglican tradition but in communion with Saint Peter and true apostolic succession, the fullness of the faith! Come back home to Rome! 🙏🇻🇦✝️
@ The words of Saint Edmund Campion come to mind, he was a priest who was martyred for his loyalty to the Catholic Church during the English reformation, “In condemning us, you condemn all your own ancestors, all our ancient bishops and kings, all that was once the glory of England-the island of saints, and the most devoted child of the See of Peter.” - Saint Edmund Campion, 1581 I will keep you in my prayers, God bless. Saint Edmund Campion, pray for us!
Why would anyone want to do so given Rome's nearly 1,000 year documented history of protecting pedophile deacons, priests, monks, monsignors, bishops, archbishops, cardinals and even popes?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Do you believe the mass is propitiary and sacrificial in itself? Do you profess that it is identical to Calvary? If not, then you deny a fundamental truth of christianity
We love Jesus Christ and His One Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church here.
May God protect His Anglican Church
You have women priests. God was never with King Henry's Church of England.
@@SanctusPaulus1962 I would encourage you to do a little more research on the truth of the Anglican tradition and not what you’ve seen on Instagram
@@joelpasma543 In the Church of England, the mother church of the Anglican Communion, 33%, or one third, of all "ministers" in "ordained ministry" are females. That is a significant minority. It isn't just some isolated phenomenon you see on social media, it's a very large presence in the real world.
@@Nieden-Pilled that is only the truth in Anglicanism since some time in the 1970’s. While I do agree that it is prolific in the modern mainline Anglican traditions, I would argue that it is not in line with the traditional and orthodox teachings of the Anglican Church to have female “ministers”
@@joelpasma543 I mean no, I wouldn't claim that having female ministers is in line with traditional anglicanism. However, the fact that an overwhelming majority of anglicans fall into one of two churches that have a significant proportion of female priests means that anglicanism, as a whole, has defected from any semblance of Christian orthodoxy.
I just finished my Catechism into the Anglican Church last Sunday and am truly thankful and overjoyed
We are so back
Yo I love your channel bro.
Finally a DOPE ANGLICAN EDIT!!!
"In my belief..."
It's time we end weak language.
Anglicanism is objectively the purest form of Christianity.
@@Anglochog1 Based response. I'm far from a Christian, but listening to your hymnals has given me inspiration for writing.
@@Anglochog1 How? The only reason the Church of England exists at all is because King Henry VIII was mad that the Pope didn't allow him to divorce his wife so he could marry his mistress.
If the King didn't have a tantrum, the English church would still be Catholic today - in more ways than one.
@@SanctusPaulus1962 This is a tremendously simplistic reading of history. There are times when reductionist readings may be helpful for contextualisation, but to stand so firmly upon, and debate so passionately with so an unnuanced reading is unhelpful.
The "only reason" the Church of England exists is certainly not because of the annulment of Henry VIII's marriage. I strongly encourage you to read more about the English Reformation and the role such characters as Cranmer, Ridley, and Latimer played therein. England, like the rest of the world, was profoundly influenced by the shifting tides of the Protestant Reformation. We must realise, however, that reformation was not "caused" by Dr. Luther, as many had been calling and longing for reform for some time (see for example Jan Huss), but his provocations and the subsequent consequences acted as a flash in the theological musket pan. Similarly, the annulment of marriage in England was not the "only reason" for England breaking away from Rome as you claim, but rather a political opportunity to institute doctrinal realignment which was already desired - as we can clearly see by the fact that the post-annulment CoE started crafting an identity separate from Rome. This was not just a different form of Avignon with Henry VIII being declared, somehow, rightfully the Pope, with a copy cat Roman church being established beneath him.
The subsequent history of the Church of England is fascinating, and its switching between being Protestant and Catholic served as a painful and bloody crucible to cast the via media we now know and love.
The claim of the Anglican tradition being the "purest form of Christianity" is based upon this: it reformed, without throwing the proverbial catholic baby out with the bathwater; so that it maintained the richness and beauty of historical Christian Tradition, remaining sensitive to mystical truths, yet also submitting to the positive influences of protestant intellectualism.
By nature of the forum, this response is also reductionist and brief, but I hope - and pray - that it may in some way have excited your sensibilities to the nuances of church history, and that you may continue to be a student of how God's promise plays out "I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."
@@SanctusPaulus1962 Truly, I simply cannot understand being proud of the Lutheran or Anglican tradition. Both relevant reformers, Henry VIII and Luther, at first weren't even trying to form their own churches, they were just so prideful that they couldn't submit to the Chair of St Peter. Notice how the holiest of anglicans/lutherans usually only love the parts of their faith that are directly taken from the Catholic Church?
Glory to the Father, and the Son, and to the Holy Spirit: As it was in beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end. Amen. -BCP⛪️💪🏾✝️
fantasic edit we need more of these on social media to recruit the youth
My faith in the Anglican Communion has been restored
Catholicism Reformed ✝️
Catholicism but with female priests and bishops at the coronation of your Muslim king 🔥🔥🔥💪🏻 so inclusive
@ No 🗿. The College of Bishops made it clear that W.O it’s not biblical nor in the deposit of Tradition.
@@deutschermichel5807Muslim king?
@@reyleon2602 why did the former Archbishop of Canterbury then permit women bishops at His Majestyʼs Coronation?
@@Philball-h1u Carol III
lovely edit bro
I admire the Anglican tradition as a Catholic catechumen. I would love to attend mass at an Anglo-Catholic Ordinariate parish.
Some may say it’s mere Christianity
Give me the 1662 BCP and the 39 Articles form of Anglicanism every day of the week.
Ehhh, some of the Articles come off a little too Calvinist. Let's go updated Use of Sarum-based liturgy and Wesley's 25 Articles.
Solid work my guy. 10/10
More of this, please!
Lord save us from Woke Welby and restore the CoE and other western branches of Anglicanism. 🙏
Kind of looks like God already forsake the CoE
Anglo-Catholic revival in the Church of England?
EYYYY! Long time no see!
About time!
And not just "smells and bells," but solid orthodox theology also.
@@galladite4924 ABSOLUTELY!!!!!!! Without it "the smells and bells" are meaningless!
There must be or it shall perish.
Let's go! Love my ordinariate parish! Awesome heritage!!!
God Save His Holy Anglican Church
My Denomination~✝️🗿
We're back???
Rule: you can’t post edits of Anglican cathedrals if you’re not dedicated to taking back the mainline that owns those things
Good thing I'm mainline.
@@Anglochog1 based!!!
@@redeemedzoomer6053 now submit to the orthodox bishop
@@omeganinjaboy Why would he do that?
It may not mean much to you because of your ecclesiology, Zoomer, but some of us believe submitting to a liberal (heretical) Bishop would be to probably forfeit our salvation (or at least greatly wound our selves spiritually).
Ugh I want to be Anglican so bad. I wish I was near an Anglican church, but Presby or Lutheran will have to do for me.
Im an Anglican, please don’t be one
Why be Anglican when you can be Lutheran. Anglicanism has given up on God
@@aaronshanker6019if you don't want people to be Anglican why are you one yourself?
@@aaronshanker6019 Why? :O
@@aaronshanker6019If you're that unhappy in the Anglican Church, LEAVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"My tradition is a king's divorce"
Where is this interview from?
Did you figure it out I’m wondering too
Did you figure it out😭😅?@@Ahhhhhhhh123
@@Ahhhhhhhh123do you still need it? Because I found it
If you see yourself drawn to the sacredness of the liturgy, read how King Henry VIII made the schism and attend to Traditional Latin mass.
The Anglican Tradition?
There are mostly catholic traditions in the Anglican Church in that film...
How to fail to understand Anglicanism 101:
one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.
Anglicans got it from somewhere. In fact, Anglicans used to believe in the Eucharist until modern times that’s is until the 18th or 19th century or so. But they were very similar except in papal authority. Unfortunately they went super liberal now and abandoned all tradition.
@@nickd7568 Only the liberal party has done so. I am personally under an extremely conservative bishop and our diocese and province is not in communion with any women clergy. We are not alone by any means either. We are holding out, God willing the Anglican Church will regain the historic Sees for orthodoxy.
As a Catholic I can't wait to reunite with the Anglicans (whatever that will mean); fire edit sir!
Can you make a Anglican Christmas hymn playlist
Perfect 🙏🔥
If a man divorces his wife and marries another, he commits adultery against her
Are you the same Anglochog from Twitter? I mean the Aussie with the Richard Hooker pf pic?
🗿
BASED!
Where are the transgender priests?
Where are the female bishops?
Where is the Archbishop of Canterbury who recently said that gay sex is okay if it's in a committed relationship?
Why do you want those so badly? Keep your corrupt toons out of the church.
Bro reading this I realised that no matter how corrupted the Catholic Churchʼs clergy may get, it will never reach the abyss of the Briʼish
so sad how we've let our heritage be defiled
Catholics and Anglicans can really work together if we both go back to tradition 🤝🏻
The "Anglican" tradition you speak of is just copied from the Roman Rite, and this in taking in account of use of Sarum elements that were taken.
The Church of England is in a bad state, and I know Rome is going through some issues of its own right now, but I believe all Anglicans should really look into the Personal Ordinariate, preserved Anglican tradition but in communion with Saint Peter and true apostolic succession, the fullness of the faith!
Come back home to Rome! 🙏🇻🇦✝️
No
@
The words of Saint Edmund Campion come to mind, he was a priest who was martyred for his loyalty to the Catholic Church during the English reformation,
“In condemning us, you condemn all your own ancestors, all our ancient bishops and kings, all that was once the glory of England-the island of saints, and the most devoted child of the See of Peter.” - Saint Edmund Campion, 1581
I will keep you in my prayers, God bless.
Saint Edmund Campion, pray for us!
Why would anyone want to do so given Rome's nearly 1,000 year documented history of protecting pedophile deacons, priests, monks, monsignors, bishops, archbishops, cardinals and even popes?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Do you believe the mass is propitiary and sacrificial in itself? Do you profess that it is identical to Calvary? If not, then you deny a fundamental truth of christianity
This is my vision for the Ordinariate as a future priest (Deo Volente)
Anglican heresy
based as hel- I mean heaven
But today Anglicanism is woke🏳️🌈
Not those of us in orthodox, traditional Anglican denominations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cope 🏳️🌈