Integral of arctan(x^2) from 0 to 1 using power series, calculus 2 tutorial

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
  • Integral of arctan(x^2) from 0 to 1 using power series,
    Please subscribe for more math content!
    Check out my T-shirts & Hoodies: teespring.com/...
    support bprp on Patreon (there's a discount code to bprp Teespring store for everyone) / blackpenredpen
    Check out my site & social media
    😃 blackpenredpen...
    😃 / blackpenredpen
    😃 / blackpenredpen
    Thank you for your support!
    blackpenredpen | 曹老師

ความคิดเห็น • 34

  • @gouravmadhwal5548
    @gouravmadhwal5548 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Plzz integrate
    ln(ln(ln(lnx)))

  • @asserzayed1902
    @asserzayed1902 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ah finally I relate more to these .. now studying engineering and actually my final in calc 2 is in 4 days 💙 keep it up LOOOVE your channel

  • @sahilkumar-qf9tg
    @sahilkumar-qf9tg 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could anyone tell me a god book for calculus.... By the way I am your huge fan sir..

    • @eduardomamede6548
      @eduardomamede6548 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I used Stewart for calc2 and I like it!

  • @jadegrace1312
    @jadegrace1312 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why not use sigma notation, problems like these are much easier to look at if you just write it like that

  • @h4c_18
    @h4c_18 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How curious, you can do integration by parts to integrate that :D. And you don't need any top notch functions like erf, Si and those.

  • @devonhansen1831
    @devonhansen1831 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Perfect!!! This is what I needed to see. Cleared it up well. Thanks.

  • @kimothefungenuis
    @kimothefungenuis 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You could've used u= arctan (x^2) and integrate

    • @GhostyOcean
      @GhostyOcean 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oh dear God, don't try this. The integration gets VERY nasty with all that trig. Secant and cosecants to fractional powers. Absolutely horrible

    • @GhostyOcean
      @GhostyOcean 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Mathias ICARTE MANCILLA this method also ends in a VERY nasty state. Do no try

    • @angelmendez-rivera351
      @angelmendez-rivera351 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      GhostyOcean That is not that terrible, actually, because you can always convert functions to fractional powers into related functions with integer powers. I would take it over integrating arctan of a function.

    • @angelmendez-rivera351
      @angelmendez-rivera351 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think x^2 = u is wiser, since du = 2x dx => du/2SqRt(u) = dx gives arctan x^2 dx = arctan(u)/2SqRt(u) du. Now we can integrate by parts, choosing 1/2SqRt(u) to integrate and arctan(u) to differentiate. As for the boundaries, u = 0 and u = 1, they remain the same. Now the first part of the answer is SqRt(u)•arctan(u) from 0 to 1, which is π/4. The second part of the answer requires integrating SqRt(u)/(1 + u^2). Now if one must let SqRt(u) = v, then dv = du/2SqRt(u) = du/2v, so du = 2v dv. Then our integrand is 2v^2/(1 + v^4) dv, the bounds still remain the same. Now we are getting somewhere. Notice that 1 + v^4 + 2v^2 = 1 + 2v^2 + v^4 = (1 + v^2)^2. Hence 1 + v^4 - 2v^2 + 2v^2 = 1 + v^4 = (1 + v^2)^2 - 2v^2 = (1 + v^2)^2 - (SqRt(2)•v)^2 = [v^2 + SqRt(2)•v + 1]•[v^2 - SqRt(2)•v + 1]. Let me call this quantity D for the sake of typing convenience. Now we get to do the strangest partial fraction decomposition exercise I have ever done in my life. 2v^2/D = (Av + B)/(v^2 - SqRt(2)•v + 1) + (Cv + D)/(v^2 + SqRt(2)•v + 1) = [(Av + B)(v^2 + SqRt(2)•v + 1) + (Cv + D)(v^2 - SqRt(2)•v + 1)]/D => (A + C)v^3 + (ASqRt(2) + B - CSqRt(2) + D)v^2 + (A + BSqRt(2) + C - DSqRt(2))v + (B + D) = 2v^2, such that A + C = 0, B + D = 0, A + BSqRt(2) + C - DSqRt(2) = 0 & ASqRt + B - CSqRt(2) + D = 2. From the first 2 equations, C = -A and D = -B, so A + B•SqRt(2) - A + B•SqRt(2) = 2B•SqRt(2) = 0 and A•SqRt(2) + B + A•SqRt(2) - B = 2 = 2A•SqRt(2) = 2. Now we can conclude that B = D = 0 & A = 1/SqRt(2) & C = -1/SqRt(2).
      Recollecting everything, our original integral, arctan(x^2), from x = 0 to x = 1, is now equal to π/4 minus the [integral of {(1/SqRt(2))•v/(v^2 - SqRt(2)•v + 1) - (1/SqRt(2))•v/(v^2 + SqRt(2)•v + 1)} from v = 0 to v = 1]. This can be rewritten as π/4 + 2^(-/2)•Integral{v/(v^2 + SqRt(2)•v + 1); v = [0, 1]} - 2^(-/2)•Integral{v/(v^2 - SqRt(2)•v + 1); v = [0, 1]}. Whoa! We came a long way, did we not?
      Now, we need to solve the remaining two integrals, which is far easier than the original integral. For the first one, we should use the fact that v^2 + SqRt(2)•v + 1/2 = (v + 1/SqRt(2))^2, so v^2 + SqRt(2)•v + 1 = [v + 2^(-/2)] + /2. Let w = v + 2^(-/2), so that the boundaries become w = 2^(-/2) and w = 1 + 2^(-/2). Then the denominator is w^2 + [2^(-/2)]^2, and the numerator is w - 2^(-/2). This means the first integral I1 can be decomposed into two integrals, the first one being w/(w^2 + [2^(-/2)]^2) with the given bounds. Let y = w^2 + 1/2 so that 2w dw = dy, the integrand becoming 1/2•dy/y. The boundaries for this are y = 1 and y = 1 + SqRt(2) + 1/2 + 1/2 = 2 + SqRt(2). This integral simplifies to Ln(SqRt(2 + SqRt(2))), where Ln is the natural logarithm. The second part of the integral is -2^(-/2)/(w^2 + [2^(-/2)]^2). The antiderivative of this is -2^(-/2)•1/2^(-/2)•arctan(w/2^(-/2) = - arctan(SqRt(2)•w). Then evaluating at the boundaries and subtracting we get - arctan(1) + arctan(SqRt(2) + 1) = arctan(SqRt(2) + 1) - π/4. Then I1 = arctan(SqRt(2) + 1) + Ln(2 + SqRt(2))/2 - π/4. In the expression π/4 + 2^(-/2)•Integral{v/(v^2 + SqRt(2)•v + 1); v = [0, 1]} - 2^(-/2)•Integral{v/(v^2 - SqRt(2)•v + 1); v = [0, 1]}, we have that I1 is multiplied by 1/SqRt(2), so this amounts to arctan(SqRt(2) + 1)/SqRt(2) + Ln(2 + SqRt(2))/(2•SqRt(2)) - (π/4)/SqRt(2). Combining this with the π/4, we have π/4•δ/SqRt(2) + arctan(SqRt(2) + 1)/SqRt(2) + Ln(2 + SqRt(2))/(2•SqRt(2)), where δ is the silver ratio SqRt(2) - 1.
      Now all that remains to do is calculate the second integral, I2, multiply it by 1/SqRt(2), and subtract it from the beast constant we already obtained in the previous step. This will gives us the final result for the definite integral of arctan x^2 from x = 0 to x = 1.
      The second integral has the integrand v/(v^2 - SqRt(2)•v + 1). Note that v^2 - SqRt(2)•v + /2 = (v - /SqRt(2))^2, so the denominator is (v -/SqRt(2))^2 + 1/2. Let w = v - /SqRt(2). This has dw = dv and for the bounds, w = -/SqRt(2) and w = δ/SqRt(2). The integrand becomes (w + /SqRt(2))/(w^2 + (1/SqRt(2))^2). This can be decomposed into two parts. The first part has integrand w/(w^2 + (/SqRt(2))^2) with antiderivative Ln(w^2 + 1/2)/2. Evaluated at the boundaries, we have Ln(1)/2 - Ln((δ^2 + 1)/2)/2 = Ln(2)/2 - Ln(2 - SqRt(2))/2. The second part is /SqRt(2)•/(w^2 + (/SqRt(2))^2). This has antiderivative arctan(SqRt(2)•w). Evaluated at the boundaries, we have arctan(-1) - arctan(SqRt(2) - 1) = -π/4 - arctan(SqRt(2) - 1). Multiplying by -1/SqRt(2), we get π/4•1/SqRt(2) + arctan(SqRt(2) - 1)/SqRt(2) + Ln(2 - SqRt(2))/(2•SqRt(2)) - Ln(2)/(2•SqRt(2)).
      Combining the beastly constants, the result is π/4 + (arctan[SqRt(2) + 1] + arctan[SqRt(2) - 1])/SqRt(2). Notice how calculating this definite integral, despite difficult, required only algebraic manipulations. This means one can actually calculate the antiderivative of arctan(x^2). I will not do this right now because it will take much time.

    • @angelmendez-rivera351
      @angelmendez-rivera351 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Okay, I learned the integral wrong. It seems I made some algebraic mistakes along the way. I was not too far off from the real answer, in any case.

  • @ΒασίληςΠαπαδάκης-ε9π
    @ΒασίληςΠαπαδάκης-ε9π 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool, keep up the good work!

  • @namannarang4208
    @namannarang4208 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    N! = N^N solve n I just thought it and it isn't possible right

    • @rot6015
      @rot6015 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      N=1

    • @namannarang4208
      @namannarang4208 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rot6015 lol other from 1 I know 1 is a solution

    • @rot6015
      @rot6015 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      For real values theres only 1 and if you take the limit also 0, i dont know about complex solutions tho

  • @david-yt4oo
    @david-yt4oo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    STEEEEEEEVE please, it's time to make a (complete) thorough playlist on VECTOR CALCULUS
    IT'S TIME TO STOP with mortal calculus and... transcend

    • @98danielray
      @98danielray 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      vector is also meh.

    • @david-yt4oo
      @david-yt4oo 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@98danielray is it though?

    • @blackpenredpen
      @blackpenredpen  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Check Out Dr. Peyam! He has many good videos on them already.

    • @angelmendez-rivera351
      @angelmendez-rivera351 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      daniel Yes, it is very meh. Tensor calculus, though... now that is truly the calculus of the gods. I would like to see a series on that.

    • @david-yt4oo
      @david-yt4oo 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@angelmendez-rivera351 me too man, but as someone who is just starting to check out that subject, I would say that vector calculus let's you ease into tensor calculus.

  • @DonSolaris
    @DonSolaris 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like this comment!

  • @kimothefungenuis
    @kimothefungenuis 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    First comment

  • @mattiecotter7290
    @mattiecotter7290 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    DAB