The Problem of Perception (John Searle)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 41

  • @evinnra2779
    @evinnra2779 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I can't wait to see you re-upload more of these lectures.

  • @johnjackson917
    @johnjackson917 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    a damn shame about all the business of him being a creep ... Searle has got a lot of good lectures out there. Happy to see you re-uploading them. Thanks much as always, PO

    • @DarrenMcStravick
      @DarrenMcStravick 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      He must be a pragmatist about ethics too. Lost so much respect for him. No integrity left in that man.

    • @johnjackson917
      @johnjackson917 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yeah its a disgrace honestly

    • @reddykilowatt
      @reddykilowatt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      meh then I guess you can go all the way back and cancel Socrates and Plato too.

    • @DarrenMcStravick
      @DarrenMcStravick 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@reddykilowatt What do you even think you're contributing by saying that?

    • @reddykilowatt
      @reddykilowatt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DarrenMcStravick seems pretty obvious if you are familiar with their thoughts and behavior

  • @77capr3
    @77capr3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The recording seems cut short to just before he gets around to making his main point of rescuing naive realism. Is there a more complete recording of his lecture?

    • @ДДД-й6ы
      @ДДД-й6ы หลายเดือนก่อน

      How can naive realism be saved?
      The brain deals with transformed signals, neurons, synapses, and neuroimpulses. So there is no direct perception.
      You cannot see the world directly. only through neuroimpulses in the brain.
      Just as it cannot be called direct, naive realism when you see a person on a computer monitor. This is not a real person, but a transformed one. Copy.
      Similarly, you can only see a COPY of the world, but not directly.

  • @lizgichora6472
    @lizgichora6472 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent! Thank you for the lecture; from Renee Descartes objective reality and perceptions as well as Epistemic objectivity derived from data through Experience and Intentionality Professor John Searle

  • @casapuradu6059
    @casapuradu6059 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good day gentleman! Where could I find the rest of the lecture I am really enthusiast to listen to it. Thank you

  • @user-vg7zv5us5r
    @user-vg7zv5us5r 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:04:08 Oops, my mind has shifted during that part so I haven't heard what Searle had said)

  • @Bibibosh
    @Bibibosh ปีที่แล้ว

    111th like. something to be proud of.

  • @user-vg7zv5us5r
    @user-vg7zv5us5r 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    28:19 Sound wave and sound isn't the same? Or prof. Searle distinct a mechanic oscillation of particles from what happens in our ears.

    • @ДДД-й6ы
      @ДДД-й6ы หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's not about what's going on in your ears. It's about how the brain interprets it.
      The final result of what is happening in your ears is only neuroimpulses. And that's what the brain is dealing with. And not with vibrations of sound waves.
      And only after the brain perceives these neuroimpulses does the SENSATION of sound arise.
      By the way, the neuroimpulses coming from the ears are exactly the same in nature as the neuroimpulses coming from the optic nerve.

  • @africandawahrevival
    @africandawahrevival ปีที่แล้ว

    What I got from this lecture, "Deesaster" 😂

  • @user-vg7zv5us5r
    @user-vg7zv5us5r 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:00:02 It doesn't matter. It just is))