For the past six months I’ve been self studying calc, trig and physics in hope that I make a career change to engineering. These videos are making a lot of sense and helping stay on course. Thank you for your service
@@MathAndScience Gravity is an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded (or blocked) ON BALANCE. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Consider what is E=MC2, AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Consider what is THE EYE !!! Notice what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE !!! (Think about what is water !!) Notice what is the orange (AND setting) Sun. Think about what is lava. Lava IS orange, AND it is even blood red !!! Consider, ON BALANCE, what is BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Again, consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE; AND consider WHAT IS E=MC2 !!! The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. NOW, consider WHAT IS E=MC2 in conjunction WITH what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of/AS SPACE; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Indeed, ON BALANCE, consider what is the fully illuminated AND setting/WHITE MOON. CLEARLY, WHAT IS E=MC2 is dimensionally consistent (ON BALANCE). c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). CLEARLY, it is all correct and proven ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. Again, consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT AND description is improved in the truly superior mind. Indeed, BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Great. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@@MathAndScience WHY AND HOW THE BALANCED, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE IS CONSISTENT WITH F=MA AND E=MC2: The following also CLEARLY explains why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. c squared represents a dimension of SPACE on balance WITH the fact that the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Indeed, the sky is blue; AND what is THE EARTH/ground is ALSO BLUE (on balance) !! Consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c) (ON BALANCE); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is (CLEARLY AND necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). General Relativity is directly taken from Special Relativity. E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. I have exposed Einstein. Beautiful. Note: Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Think carefully about the black “space” AS WELL. Great. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, as BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. THE EYE represents a two dimensional surface OR SPACE (ON BALANCE) that is consistent with F=ma AND E=mc2. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN/ON BALANCE. Consider what is THE SUN. The sky is blue, and THE EARTH/ground is ALSO BLUE. Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GREAT. E=mc2 IS F=ma. This explains the fourth dimension AND the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. By Frank DiMeglio
I'm 28 and I never wanted to learn at school but upon leaving, I find myself having that thirst for knowledge and I guess starting now is better than not starting at all. I'm really enjoying these episodes and I feel like I'm learning a lot however, I'm a little confused. I'm sure you'll explain it if I continue watching, but at 34:40, you said that it doesn't matter what order you add vectors because the resultant will be the same. This confuses me because I thought vectors show direction and magnitude, so you have to take into consideration of the positive and negative signs... How does the result become the same? Again, I left school 13 years ago and I've panicked about attempting this subject since finishing so my math is on point as it used to be and I'm sure it'll make sense the further through the course I go. Thank you for these videos. Maybe I won't be a cleaner for much longer haha
I think I'm getting confused... Its been a long day haha. Maybe I need a break. I'll get it at some point. You're explanations are perfect. You've helped me understand a few things that I couldn't grasp before, and I hope it's all worth the grind in the end. Thank you
@@horatiowolfe9025 You'll get there man, I promise. Regarding adding vectors in any order, think of this example. Say you walk EAST 5 km then walk SOUTH 3 km. You will be at some location roughly southeast from your starting position. These are all vectors. The first leg and the second leg are all vectors and the final location is a vector with respect to the starting point. Now, start over, except this time, first walk SOUTH 3 km, then walk EAST 5 km. The only difference is the order of the walking, but you end up in the same location. You "added" the vectors in a different way but got to the same place. That is basically it and it works for adding any number of vectors.
@@MathAndScience Minutes after I left that comment, I managed understand it thank you. I was just getting confused because of the sign. Adding scalars are always positive and that's simple, but you have to take into consideration of the sign when adding vectors and I always thought that mixing positive and negative in different ways don't always give the same answer and that's why I was confused. I appreciate the reply thank you. I'll be sure to pay for your courses on your website once I've got some more knowledge behind me
For the past six months I’ve been self studying calc, trig and physics in hope that I make a career change to engineering. These videos are making a lot of sense and helping stay on course. Thank you for your service
updateeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee us
If every teacher is good at teaching like you , everyone in the world would've been good at science courses ,
Thanks for your good work sir.
as a student I learned more from your video than the teachers in the philippines teach it, not with bias but that is the truth. Keep theaching Sir❤✨
Thank you so much!
Same bro
@@MathAndScience Gravity is an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded (or blocked) ON BALANCE. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Consider what is E=MC2, AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Consider what is THE EYE !!! Notice what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE !!! (Think about what is water !!) Notice what is the orange (AND setting) Sun. Think about what is lava. Lava IS orange, AND it is even blood red !!! Consider, ON BALANCE, what is BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Again, consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE; AND consider WHAT IS E=MC2 !!! The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. NOW, consider WHAT IS E=MC2 in conjunction WITH what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of/AS SPACE; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Indeed, ON BALANCE, consider what is the fully illuminated AND setting/WHITE MOON. CLEARLY, WHAT IS E=MC2 is dimensionally consistent (ON BALANCE). c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). CLEARLY, it is all correct and proven ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. Again, consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE.
The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT AND description is improved in the truly superior mind. Indeed, BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Great.
By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@@MathAndScience WHY AND HOW THE BALANCED, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE IS CONSISTENT WITH F=MA AND E=MC2:
The following also CLEARLY explains why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution.
c squared represents a dimension of SPACE on balance WITH the fact that the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Indeed, the sky is blue; AND what is THE EARTH/ground is ALSO BLUE (on balance) !! Consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c) (ON BALANCE); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is (CLEARLY AND necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE).
General Relativity is directly taken from Special Relativity. E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. I have exposed Einstein. Beautiful.
Note: Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Think carefully about the black “space” AS WELL. Great. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, as BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. THE EYE represents a two dimensional surface OR SPACE (ON BALANCE) that is consistent with F=ma AND E=mc2. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN/ON BALANCE.
Consider what is THE SUN. The sky is blue, and THE EARTH/ground is ALSO BLUE. Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GREAT. E=mc2 IS F=ma. This explains the fourth dimension AND the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental.
By Frank DiMeglio
This is for sure one of the best classes I've ever had. Thank you.
I've been looking for an explanation to your third example for 2 days now. My professor couldn’t explain something so simple thank you SO much.
Knowing you used to work at NASA just makes me want to watch more
Brilliant videos thank you. My daughter is homeschooled and these are very helpful.
much-thumbed for the teacher who highly professional teaching like him.
What a great teacher you are!
Thank you so much!
I thankful for living in an era I can just learn things people died creating/descovering
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE SIR , YOU ARE THE BEST TEACHER.
Thank you so much. It was very very useful. So creative in explanation and examples.
ur lessons are the best thing ever!!!!
This guy is phenomenal
Wow thanks!
so perfect i like it........we need more videos don't stop
Thank you very much! This really helped me out and I’m just starting! ♥️
NICE EXPLANTION U HV OPEN MY HEARD ON VACTORS AS A ZAMBIAN STUDENT THANKS AOLT
Start video at 13:00 if you want skip the intuitive stuff.
THANK YOU... SIR...!!!
Great explanation, thank you!!
Thank you sir
God bless you 🙇🏻♂️
Can i ask you ? What major are you studying?
Amazing and amusing!!!
Bless your heart
As a student l lean more, can you go on with calculations on resultant vector
Thanks so much l getting more understanding than l did at Kings college budo
Thank you so much. It very useful 🥰
Thanks so much for this lesson. My question is, must the resultant force always connect to the tail of vector force 1? Is that how it works?
Hahaha! You just answered my question, sir. Thanks
I'm 28 and I never wanted to learn at school but upon leaving, I find myself having that thirst for knowledge and I guess starting now is better than not starting at all. I'm really enjoying these episodes and I feel like I'm learning a lot however, I'm a little confused.
I'm sure you'll explain it if I continue watching, but at 34:40, you said that it doesn't matter what order you add vectors because the resultant will be the same. This confuses me because I thought vectors show direction and magnitude, so you have to take into consideration of the positive and negative signs... How does the result become the same?
Again, I left school 13 years ago and I've panicked about attempting this subject since finishing so my math is on point as it used to be and I'm sure it'll make sense the further through the course I go.
Thank you for these videos. Maybe I won't be a cleaner for much longer haha
I think I'm getting confused... Its been a long day haha. Maybe I need a break. I'll get it at some point. You're explanations are perfect. You've helped me understand a few things that I couldn't grasp before, and I hope it's all worth the grind in the end. Thank you
@@horatiowolfe9025 You'll get there man, I promise. Regarding adding vectors in any order, think of this example. Say you walk EAST 5 km then walk SOUTH 3 km. You will be at some location roughly southeast from your starting position. These are all vectors. The first leg and the second leg are all vectors and the final location is a vector with respect to the starting point. Now, start over, except this time, first walk SOUTH 3 km, then walk EAST 5 km. The only difference is the order of the walking, but you end up in the same location. You "added" the vectors in a different way but got to the same place. That is basically it and it works for adding any number of vectors.
@@MathAndScience Minutes after I left that comment, I managed understand it thank you. I was just getting confused because of the sign. Adding scalars are always positive and that's simple, but you have to take into consideration of the sign when adding vectors and I always thought that mixing positive and negative in different ways don't always give the same answer and that's why I was confused. I appreciate the reply thank you. I'll be sure to pay for your courses on your website once I've got some more knowledge behind me
Has any proof for triangular and parallelogram vector addition?
33:00 The Rocket Would Be Destroyed Right?
In the last video you never got to vectors, can you reupload it or something to say what a vector actually is?
I uploaded the full version for you here:
th-cam.com/video/V_CJXlgar8Y/w-d-xo.html
Good luck in your studies!
Jason, MathAndScience.com
@@MathAndScience Thank you, I was about to ask the same question as HeyHannah
this totally helped me! (i failed my quiz)
Still trying to digest
No example problems?
Where can I find the next part to this video?
The playlist perhaps..
could i question and you answer it
3blue 1brown even not explain like this
"...i used to work in NASA" take that 😉
Sir, you used to work at nasa?😅
Yep!
I don't understand
hxddccfjjsjcsjcjjshdjjdhxdhxcdndncbdjjxdhcjhdhdhjddjcndnfdndjdjdhchfxhdhshxhshdhdjcfjzjfksksdkfkdkdjfjdjdhsufudjsrbsjfhdjfjdfjdhjrdnfndjcjfjchsjfjsjcjfdjjddddjjfjffjdjjdfhjhhfchdhfuujdjdjjdjdjjjcdncjdjcjdjfkaalakkaalddikdkgcjsngndjtusjgrisjugsuauuqudkwigksjgskcjsjfjr
i👌👌👌👌
You talk too much
Thank you for your explanations
U're one of d best teachers I've ever seen 🩵🩵tnxs 🤝
I don't understand