Hellmuth hasnt been playing that great for a while but he is a great commentator like a young sexton, if he ever retires that would be a great new job for him
40:38 Scott gets confronted and suddenly can't speak English. I can't stand that neckbeard. Jungle: *Fuck you* Scott: _welL ok yea Eh EhH we're go-nna neEd tHe Fl-floor aNd li-like mAke uSe oF tHaT_ *_smiles_*
its fabulous to be able to watch these series, thank you ... for the future, why bother mic-ing the table when the THREE commentators have enough cross talk to drown out any of the more interesting table talk .... expert commentary is great, but its too much most of the time ... thanks ... less talking heads and more actual poker table talk please, thanks #partypoker #partypokerLIVE
The difference is he owned up to his mistakes and clearly apologized. Sitting at the end of the table is the absolute worst because you never see when the guy(s) across from you have cards. Antonio was also covering his cards with his hands, making it likely Jungle didn't even see that Antonio was in the hand. Like he said, if he'd had known the pot was 3-way, Jungle would've bet the flop himself when Antonio checks to him.
I'm absolutely convinced phil laak purposefully makes himself look as stupid as possible when he's in the commentary booth. Always recommending people call on the button with the 94s and call in the SB with J7s and shit like that, but then you watch him play and he never actually does those things. It's just an example, but for someone who's made as much money playing poker as he has, he's definitely not as dumb as he's making himself out to be with what he's saying.
Jungle IS angling!!!! His out of turn check induced Antonio to bet into Jungle's pair of aces. Antonio's bet got Seiver to fold. That wouldn't have happened without the out off turn check and Seiver would have won.
@Gabriel N - People will say because Scott Seiver believed Jungleman was pulling an angle but essentially it's because Seiver folded a pair of 8s and the third came up on the turn. In essence Seiver played his hand badly and wanted someone else to blame for it. Glad the others stuck up for Jungleman because accusing someone of angling where the show is going out to millions is essentially attempting to destroy that player's career. It was an inforgiveable accusation that Seiver should never have made; especially since it was his fault playing badly in the first place
@@Della624 Unless you have some very specific inside knowledge I couldn't see that happening. All the hundreds of thousands of hands that Seiver had played to this point in his career and he gets weasled by a folded pair of 8s? That would turn him into a nutter that shouldn't be seen in public. However the idea the idea that he got annoyed by someone, who should have known better, breaking the fundamental rules of the game? Vastly more plausible. As to trying to destroy someone's career nothing could be easier. Call the match referee over, lay out your complaint of repeated breaches of table rules, note rules not etiquette, and gain a judgement. It happens all over the world all the time. Same situation with string betting.. I'm not saying you're making stuff up but unless your source is Scott Seiver from the last 7 years..... Well you get what I mean. Seiver noticed it only happening on his preflop betting. He had already gently asked Jungle to focus more. Then, quite rightly remonstrated repeats of the same behaviour. I agree the actual word cheat was too forceful but I understand in the moment heat. Have a good day wherever you are in the world
@@Della624 interesting theory, but he literally started complaining before he folded, both in this hand and @12:24 ("It's not even on you. It's never on you when you act.") indicating that even then it had been going on for a while.
![เขามัทรี - เอ็กซ์ ศุภกฤต - จอนนี่มิวสิค [ Official MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AS9ufKuQIVs/mqdefault.jpg)
Hellmuth hasnt been playing that great for a while but he is a great commentator like a young sexton, if he ever retires that would be a great new job for him
40:38 Scott gets confronted and suddenly can't speak English. I can't stand that neckbeard.
Jungle: *Fuck you*
Scott: _welL ok yea Eh EhH we're go-nna neEd tHe Fl-floor aNd li-like mAke uSe oF tHaT_ *_smiles_*
its fabulous to be able to watch these series, thank you ... for the future, why bother mic-ing the table when the THREE commentators have enough cross talk to drown out any of the more interesting table talk .... expert commentary is great, but its too much most of the time ... thanks ... less talking heads and more actual poker table talk please, thanks #partypoker #partypokerLIVE
Get out of here , just leave u negative poo
Expert commentary would be great, but instead we get Jennifer Tilly...
I quite like both Tilly and Laak commentating individually with Jesse, but both together is a disaster, they can't stop talking over eachother!
There we go Helmuthian Logic No 1.
Clearly Jungle wasn’t angling Seiver. That does NOT excuse his mistakes. He needed to pay closer attention and quit making those mistakes
The difference is he owned up to his mistakes and clearly apologized. Sitting at the end of the table is the absolute worst because you never see when the guy(s) across from you have cards. Antonio was also covering his cards with his hands, making it likely Jungle didn't even see that Antonio was in the hand. Like he said, if he'd had known the pot was 3-way, Jungle would've bet the flop himself when Antonio checks to him.
its curiosity killed the cat but satisfaction brought it back...... good old phil
1:29:45 Phil Laak mouth full of food still commentating lol
Has there ever been a more complex action ridden episode of poker ?
Did Phil and Jennifer go into the bathroom and do a bunch of cocaine during this episode? Neither of them know what’s going on. Gibberish.
I'm absolutely convinced phil laak purposefully makes himself look as stupid as possible when he's in the commentary booth. Always recommending people call on the button with the 94s and call in the SB with J7s and shit like that, but then you watch him play and he never actually does those things. It's just an example, but for someone who's made as much money playing poker as he has, he's definitely not as dumb as he's making himself out to be with what he's saying.
Why does Jungle wait until he starts playing live poker to always eat. Can’t eat before the game starts?
Literally the worst commentary team in the history of poker
Maybe just stick to the main commentator as the other two ruin it
Especially when one of them is eating and talking at the same time. No one wants to hear that.
Scott Seiver is the WORST! His table talk is deplorable
i wonder what hellmuths strategy is
Tilly should not be a commentator...
Helmuth is 10 times the player than these other guys....they are so disrespectful...
LET PHIL TALK EVERY ONE ELSE SHOT UP!!!!!!!!
Jungle IS angling!!!! His out of turn check induced Antonio to bet into Jungle's pair of aces. Antonio's bet got Seiver to fold. That wouldn't have happened without the out off turn check and Seiver would have won.
Over the top on the commentary, way too much talking
When was this filmed?
2013
1998
Hellmuths’ nickname should be PEG, poker explanation and/ or excuse generator...
wtf is Seiver drinking? @30
HAHAHHAHAHHAHA
Woooooow what a call by the magician. Who hired tilly as a commentator??? 🤬
Scott trying to make himself relevant by getting at a real poker player Phill. #desperate
ONLY PHIL LACK CAN TALK THE REST SHOULD NOT TALK!!!!!!!!!
Seiver...”he’s not actually a cat so it doesn’t make any sense” total needle! Got to give it to Phil...not scared to look like an ass!
can someone explain why scott went bananas on jungleman?
Gabriel N Jungle was not paying attention a few hands and played before it was his turn, scott flipped out cause it was constantly happening.
Scott believed that Jungleman was pulling an angle shoot
@Gabriel N - People will say because Scott Seiver believed Jungleman was pulling an angle but essentially it's because Seiver folded a pair of 8s and the third came up on the turn. In essence Seiver played his hand badly and wanted someone else to blame for it. Glad the others stuck up for Jungleman because accusing someone of angling where the show is going out to millions is essentially attempting to destroy that player's career. It was an inforgiveable accusation that Seiver should never have made; especially since it was his fault playing badly in the first place
@@Della624 Unless you have some very specific inside knowledge I couldn't see that happening. All the hundreds of thousands of hands that Seiver had played to this point in his career and he gets weasled by a folded pair of 8s? That would turn him into a nutter that shouldn't be seen in public. However the idea the idea that he got annoyed by someone, who should have known better, breaking the fundamental rules of the game? Vastly more plausible. As to trying to destroy someone's career nothing could be easier. Call the match referee over, lay out your complaint of repeated breaches of table rules, note rules not etiquette, and gain a judgement. It happens all over the world all the time. Same situation with string betting.. I'm not saying you're making stuff up but unless your source is Scott Seiver from the last 7 years..... Well you get what I mean. Seiver noticed it only happening on his preflop betting. He had already gently asked Jungle to focus more. Then, quite rightly remonstrated repeats of the same behaviour. I agree the actual word cheat was too forceful but I understand in the moment heat. Have a good day wherever you are in the world
@@Della624 interesting theory, but he literally started complaining before he folded, both in this hand and @12:24 ("It's not even on you. It's never on you when you act.") indicating that even then it had been going on for a while.
Tilly is good comedy
Luckely mike postle is not playing here 😀😁🤥🤥
how bad is jeniffer tily or what ever here name is... she cant even see whats going on... so surprise she is even playing poker
Why is Tilly commentating, my dog can play better poker than her
Why won’t Daniel sponsor me as an up and comer? I m a good Canadian boy!
I'm very confident that I can crush Negreaneu and Helmouth in a $100,000 buy-in tourney...........Who wants to stake me?
helmouth yes unless he catches card he cant fold negreno no. plus its poker it can be anybody night
I got you fam, I'll pitch in a dollar.
@@PartyRaveAnimals Make that $2