Can ESP Reveal a New Reality? | Episode 803 | Closer To Truth
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ส.ค. 2024
- If ESP is real--that's a big "If"--then our entire worldview would change. Existence would be somehow enlarged. But extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. Featuring interviews with Marilyn Schlitz, Dean Radin, Fred Wolf, Michael Tooley, and Alan Leshner.
Season 8, Episode 3 - #CloserToTruth
▶Register for free at CTT.com for subscriber-only exclusives: bit.ly/2GXmFsP
Closer To Truth host Robert Lawrence Kuhn takes viewers on an intriguing global journey into cutting-edge labs, magnificent libraries, hidden gardens, and revered sanctuaries in order to discover state-of-the-art ideas and make them real and relevant.
▶Free access to Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: bit.ly/376lkKN
Closer to Truth presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.
#ESP #Reality
I didn't believe in ESP either until i woke up in the middle of the night gasping for air at the precise time my father was drowning, 2,000 miles across the country from me. Many other odd events were connected to his death. This changed everything for me there after.
Reality is weirder than our species is crazy. War and poverty, fame and power, and a lot of people in the middle who think they're different than the people at the top and at the bottom. The world is crazy and reality is weirder than the entire history of mankind.
I had a similar feeling the night my mother died. It was New Year’s Eve 2006. She was suffering from cancer and on her death bed. The doctors said that she was unlikely to see through the night. I stayed with her in hospital for a few hours while she was unconscious and gasping for air.
As the night wore on I decided to stretch my legs and go downstairs for a bit of a walk. When I was downstairs I saw a TV room and decided to watch the New Year celebrations on TV. At this point I suddenly felt a strong and heavy feeling. It was indescribable and I fell to the floor on my hands and knees.
I then decided to go back upstairs. When I got to my mother’s room she had already passed. The strange feeling must have been her trying to make some sort of last connection.
What can I tell you, Robert? Unless you personally experience this weird stuff you will never believe it's real. Those of us who have, in one way or another know that it's beyond the limitations that science and the scientific method have established. If you, one day, are lucky enough to be touched by this aspect of existence, I would be very interested to know your thoughts on it, because you truly will be "Closer to Truth".
Well said. Carl Jung comments extensively on the matter. Synchronistic experiences can change your life. I can attest to that. Plato provides interesting material in some of his works.
Transcendental experiences basically have two sorts of effects/affects.
1 is you pull away from science and invest in spiritual observation and practice.
2 is you come to science with questions that science has no satisfactory answers for.
I'm not saying it's one or the other just the two basic ways it goes. Robert would likely tend to favor the latter with a life time of investigation.
One day the hardcore materialists will be the laughing stock of the world
@Keith Jones so many things that material science can't explain.
Keep dreaming...its free!
@@MrJigarparmar can't explain yet.
@Keith Jones if materialistic science able to formulate the blueness of sky ... redness of apples ... I'll be an atheist right away ..
@Stefano Portoghesi blueness of sky (ie; colors) are hardly physical realities ... It's something beyond the reach of science ..
If artificial intelligence in principle can be programmed to perceive redness of apples (ie: colors .. taste of sugar ..etc ..) ... I'll be an atheist in split seconds ..
Russell Targs speech really influenced my beliefs in remote viewing. I have even dabbled in my own experiments after listening to him. There is something there 100%. It is some type of entaglement😁. Universal information which cannot be seen or measured yet.Something like that😞
i have experienced telepathy, many times, with different persons
If it can't be seen or measured it isn't there and has no use or value.
@Clive, yea there is no value to a materialist,, you can't make money from it so you don't care!... You're welcome to your fleeting soul-less world...
Russell influenced my beliefs in ESP as well. Incredible guy.
@@Anna_Fortunka agreed. 👏
I know this is just testimony, but I've experienced it once with someone I was dating at the time. She had slipped on wet rock and almost fell off a cliff while we were hiking in Yosemite. After our little dramatic episode and on a flat part of the trail, we were walking while side-hugging each other closely, then all of a sudden I just had this sense that she knew what I was thinking, and then a second later she laughed and then said 'stop it' out loud, and then I asked what, and she said I could hear you. Then we laughed and continued hug-walking, and then when I couldn't help but continue to have scared thoughts of her dying, she said stop through the mind, and we laughed in our minds while being quiet and just hug-walking. Then we stopped hugging and just walked while holding hands, then looked at each other, and then confirmed (in actual conversation) with each other that we were hearing each others thoughts. It was unlike anything I've ever experienced, and we dated for about 3 more years after that but it never really happened again.
Perhaps you stop dating because there was nothing else you were saying to each other.
Ludwig , women I meet know what I am thinking all the time.
Hug-walking sounds awesome.
Nice presentation!! I want more videos like this, from this guy. Very, very interesting.
At least two telepathic phenomena known as: "a sense of being stared at" and that of dogs knowing when their owners are coming home have no easy material explanation. Both have been investigated and confirmed to occur by biologist Rupert Sheldrake (also interviewed by Robert for a previous CTT episode).
👏🏻👏🏻👽
Experimentation determined the reason dogs know when their owners should be home is the level of the owner's scent present in the atmosphere of the home. Dogs have 220 million olfactory receptors; wheres human beings have only 5 million. It's this difference that allows dogs to detect levels of scent more precisely than us. The dog associates the level of scent to when the owner normally comes home and anticipates the owners arrival. Dogs don't have ESP.
My dog has ESPN
Stan lee super humans also confirm that telekinesis is real.that guy can move the wooden piece without touching it.
That lady talked a lot, but said absolutely nothing.
she must be a republican or democrat
She did say something, it was just kind of hard to understand her. But her thinking on how many worlds are colliding together and how this will change us all was pretty insightful. The monopoly on knowledge that science has enjoyed in the western world is crumbling and we should all learn to adapt before we become relics in the new world that is rising. I've never experienced ESP so I can't tell if that's really a thing, but I've never experienced heart surgery either so I can't tell if that's really a thing. Sure, I can talk to people who have had heart surgery, and people who preform it and learn about it that way. But I can do the same with ESP. Truth is, most of my reality is based on ideas I have no first hand experience with and just accept as truth because it's part of my culture and it's mythology. If I had lived a hundred years ago I might very well be a Christian. If I had grown up in India I'd likely be a Hindu or a Muslim. And so on. People here give a lot of value to critical thinking, but if you really employ that then you'll know that nothing can be trusted outside of your own experience, and even that might not be as it seem. So there are limits to the usefulness of critical thinking. Just as there are limits to the usefulness of science. Science is great and all, but it can never be used to measure abstract concepts that we all agree exist, like thoughts and emotions or ethics and morality. We tend to think that when it comes to us life is better than death, so it's very easy for us to justify eradicate something that threatens our life, like a virus. But there is no scientific evidence that this is a fact, we might not be important at all, it's just an idea we have, a feeling. Same with consciousness, sentience, life in general, there might be nothing important or inherently good about any of these things, we've just decided that it is. Good and bad don't even exist from a scientific or materialistic perspective because these are abstract ideas based on feelings, but we tend to all have some idea of what is good and what is bad, so they're real things because we make them real trough a shared belief. And in that way you can say that anything is real within various groups. In a group where everyone believes UFO's are real they are real, it's real to them, and this belief alters their behavior which causes parts of this belief to manifest as real actions that affect the physical world. Even if Orthodox Christianity isn't real to me the consequences of it where very real and what happened during the Dark Ages still affects the world today and it's ripple in time will always exist. We would likely have been hundreds of years ahead of where we are now if not for the Dark Ages, and there is no way to take that time back so it will influence us for the rest of time. And the same can be said for any tiny alteration done by a single individual. So when so many different cultures and ideas are living as close to each other as they do today with the internet and everything this will influence how people think which will influence how they feel and how they behave which will influence how we build human society. So in the end what's real from my perspective might not be real from someone else's perspective, but that doesn't make it any less real. I think coffee is awesome, someone else might think it's garbage, both are true from different perspectives. Obviously most people aren't going to want to take away my coffee just because they don't like it so it's not a big deal, but a lot of other questions of "good and bad" have much greater implications, and how these end up changing our collective reality will have a great influence on the future of humanity and our societies, irregardless of if they're fitting into the box of science and materialism. Just go to India and you'll be walking into a world where spirituality, enlightenment, and even supernatural powers are very real to a great deal of people. You'll find people that will claim to have experienced these things for themselves all over the place, just like you'll find people all over the place that claim to have experienced heart surgery, but until you actually experience it yourself it's not part of your reality beyond being a belief system, a mythology. Imagine if you join a group of people that are sure aliens are visiting Earth, after a while you start to think maybe they're right, and the more into the mythology you go the more you start thinking there is something too it, and what if you then start seeing it for yourself? You essentially walked from one reality into another, both realities contained but hidden from each other within the same reality. Might work like this, we don't know, but there has to be some explanation for why some have experiences that others believe are impossible, and the scientific approach of psychology has failed at being an adequate explanation for these thing. Either way, when all of these different realities, or mythologies, collide it's bound to affect the future of humanity in ways we can't yet predict, so her point is valid.
Good luck with that. We're still waiting
@@daniel4647 profound!
Here's the thing: it's not a new reality, it's the only reality and it always was here and always will be here.
The other reality is giving your power and autonomy away to a boss instead of being creative /. tartaria
@@gmailacct9496 You can be creative anytime you want, even if you have a "boss".
Great job! It was a pleasure to watch . :)
👋👽
I once went to a lecture by a medical intuitive once and she had us do an exercise to raise out intuition and test it on a stranger near us. Bottom line was that I got five detailed exact hits (no misses) about her life and she said she was shocked. There may be a time when all of us can use our natural intuitive abilities.
@Novak Ingood She was a young female, we were told to give our impressions while the subject would not deny or confirm until we stopped. 1. Closed my eyes and saw a grove of trees- she said she loved trees and had a tree tattoo. 2. I blurted out the word "ocean" and she said the the word popped into her head just before I said it. 3. Saw an image of a fish, she is a pisces. 4. Saw a desert scene with bright sun and long empty road. 5. Saw an older woman and said it may be her mother. She said her mother lived in the desert.
Those were all the impressions I had.
@Novak Ingood I'm not a psychic, I think that latent abilities that we all have to a degree were enhanced at that meeting. I do challenge you to get someone who doesn't know you to guess 5 things right about your life to the same level of specificity as mine were. The example of coincidence that you mentioned could be an example of ESP that shows that it not that rare or special. If you are truly interested in challenging your skepticism, you should read any of the books by Dean Radin, who does scientific research on psychic phenomena. I read a few reviews of Radin's Entagled Minds, and there are hardcore skeptics who said that the book turned them around.
@Novak Ingood I never wanted this to be true, whatever "this" is. I grew up loving science and got a degree in math, physics and a fair amount of geology included. Over the years I saw that many of my ideas about what could or couldn't happen start to break down. Your to comment about Radin, which doesn't appear on YT for some reason, I'm sure you got from Wikipedia or other skeptic source. Wikipedia, which is totally controlled by drug companies, hardcore skeptics, and other special interests is totally corrupt. If you were really interested in making an unbiased opinion, you should read one of Radin's books as he provides all sources of experiments he cites and do your own analysis to see if they check out. I'm sure you won't as your mind is already made up.
@Novak Ingood The kind of skeptic I'm talking about are people who have a preconceived idea of what is or isn't possible, usually what could be called weird ideas or phenomena. At the least they will be closed to doing an unbiased analysis of it (confirmation bias) or at worst lie, distort data and use ad hominem attacks. They throw around the word science, but what they are doing is practicing a religion.
Does any of this sound familiar?
Have a nice day.
Sasquatch are some of the best psychics on the planet. Their psychic abilities and mastery of consciousness are astounding. We will learn much from the few sasquatch left
I’ve experienced it.. and I’m a well-educated, science loving, rationale person. Granted I was tripping on mushrooms, but it wasn’t an hallucination. Of course, people will assume it was, but I was able to confirm it at least for myself. I think people experience various genuine phenomena that unfortunately cannot be verified by others, but are nevertheless true events. In my case, it involved a life-long friend - I heard (or became aware of) his statements before he vocalized them. His verbalized thoughts were like a stream I had access to before they left his mouth. Though this occurred many years ago, I still recall it quite clearly, because afterward, I replayed the experience over in my mind many times - i was astounded and mesmerized. Still am.
I did. Prophetic dreams. Mind reading. Clairvoyance.
Hades Eye yes, they all seem connected
quantum game theory and quantum pseudo-telepathy are actually a thing. Agents able to access shared entangled qubits can have statistical advantages over agents with no quantum channels or classical bits shared. No, is not esoteric BS, but actually highly advanced synthesis between Bayesian analysis and quantum information
Charlls Quarra it is interesting how efforts at quantum computing suggest there is a “solution” to decoherence or how the collapsing of the wave function separates us from that world. Yet, Robert Lawrence Kuhn and scientists in general believe our experienced world to be mutually exclusive with quantum reality
If I hadn't done a large dose of shrooms myself I would think you were cracked in the head.
Is it possible for the universe to produce beings who develop the capacity to understand how everything works? 🤔
I believe in the following phenomenon:
Telepathy, remote viewing, clairaudence, astral projection and telekinesis
"I want to believe." - Fox Mulder
No stay sceptical, this civilization does not need to know about esp.
@@jameswatson5807 It already knows. It's like god, imaginary.
No it does not know, it this civilization considers ESP to be a myth.
I and a few others like for it to keep this way, we do not want people like the nazis to get a hold of this knowledge.
They would use this knowdlege to kill people were the body count would be higher than WWW2.
Using ESP you kill a mass amount of people with easily, or imagine a serial killer getting his hands on this knowledge.
He can kill and rape, woman childern as much as he please with out ever getting caught.
Let me ask you this, if you had the knowledge how to awaken ESP would, you keep it to yourself or tell the whole world.
If you would tell the world knowing what would happen, that would mean you are not a wise person.
The people who tend to have ESP, are those who have spent, years doing meditation, and they develope high levels of wisdom before ESP abilities awaken.
These folks are silent, they know the world is not ready to be aware of ESP.
@@jameswatson5807 Ha ha ha, no, wait, you're surely not serious? White magic is always stronger than black magic, don't you read any Harry Potter books?
@@cliveadams7629I asked you a hypotheical question but you could not answer it, if you found away to unlock ESP, would you keep it to yourself or tell the world.
think about, you could use ESP to predict the lottery numbers, become a multi millionair, would you ruin it.
this no a joke i am being serious, then again i have no idea if you are an adult or kid?
This show is getting better
and better
The irony is in our constant pursuit of scientific evidence for the existence of a non-scientific world.
That is holy right.
Only if you have a preconception of science as an orthodox material model. Which is an oxymoron, as science should NOT be biased.
Couldn’t everything have some scientific basis, everything from ESP to the soul? Simply a science we haven’t yet grasped.
I've had esp stuff happen. I think we all are entangled and tap into this dormant sense that we needed before language.
The big picture seems to be way beyond the observational powers of science. The spiritual paradigm seems to be closer to the big picture. I'm sure it's not quite what any of us are thinking it is though.
Unsure I understand your objection to stepping outside of time. When considering the concept of a block universe, and the idea that time and change can seem to occur inside a universe whilst an outside observer sees no change; how difficult is it to accept the possibility that some may find a link between what appears to be one moment, and another ?
Extraordinary claims do not require extraordinary evidence, they require evidence plain and simple. What does 'extraordinary evidence' even mean, that's a value judgment. The scientific method works fine just the way it is, it doesn't need any help.
to have your own experiences and experience your own proofs, read "Practical Intuition" by Laura Day, do the exercises in the book. Or learn Remote Viewing, you might surprise yourself.
And being obsessed with how it works may not be solved in our lifetimes, don't let that stop you from doing research. For Fourier Analysis to work, that you can define any waveform by summing pure sine waves of the correct frequencies and amplitudes, the theory says that these pure sine waves have to extend infinitely long. Who can get their mind around that? Why let understanding the mechanism limit your experiments?
i think the statement means: you need evidence PROPORTIONAL to the claim. but I agree with your sentiment.
here is full and complete explanation for you:
th-cam.com/video/F9DzWCy_mn4/w-d-xo.html
We are all connected.that is the fact.i my self have had so many esp events that i can not count.we all are in an ocean of consciousness connected like the molecules of water in an ocean.
I knew you were gonna say that
The problem is that regardles of how many people have had a psychic experience, we are not able to demonstrate this at will. Until we can, there are no facts.
Cat Man just because we don’t have the sensors doesn’t mean nothing is happening beyond them
@@perewihongi6457 I quite agree that people including myself have experienced psychic phenomena, I'm just saying there are no facts regarding this. A fact is irrefutable evidence and if we have facts we can work with them. As we have no facts, we cannot demonstrate the existence of such phenomena.
Simply... Within space-time, things must be correlated with hard evidence. Once you throw out space-time, then wonky things become the norm, and not the exception..
We can’t explain how consciousness manifests in the physical realm.
Fred's idea is interesting. ESP could indeed be a totally different system: no physical mechanism, no mathematics, knowledge without information traveling, nothing tangible at all (however much it infuriates Robert).
Perhaps ESP involves not only a new and diverse way of thinking but an experience that goes beyond thinking itself.
I often wonder if "skeptics" (who most often are actually fundamentalist believers against psy) suffer from a lack of imagination or an imagination that is too rich to discern delusion from what is realistic.
it's fun to watch the host accommodate the stories offered by some of the interviewees with the patience of a long suffering listener
Please understand that I am not being antagonistic, but am trying to make you think for a second. "The gap between macro and micro seems too vast" -- really? Second video in this line I have watched, but that phrase caught me off guard. Personally, I have no clue as to where the realm of ESP resides. I make no claims at all. Concerning the "gap" between the micro and the macro? Do you know anything about physics? (Serious question to make you pause.) The statement is comparable with isolating a lake producing the glass of water you drink, from the H2O molecules, or from the atoms, or from the spookier funky aspects of the quantum effects which affect the waves, particles, atoms, molecules, all the way to the lake in question. You can no more isolate the micro from the macro, without logically invalidating both. They are inherently part of the same mechanism, just viewed from two different perspectives. Neither exists independently from the other. The micro affects the macro, and vice-versa. To put it in another way, there is no such thing as "solid" when you consider that, in every case of "physical contact", it is just quadrillions of tiny fields interacting with each other. You never even touch the doorknob you grab in that purely physical sense of the word. The very concept is illusory in that context. Labelling something as "quantum" does not isolate it from the experienced and measurable reality that we experience daily. Everything that is real existed long before man ever bothered to wonder about it, let alone label it.
22:11 Literally 😂😂 a dig at certain atheists individuals who think science is on their side while in reality science is neutral
Thank you so much! Iv been waiting so long to see Deen Radin on the RADAR. 👩🏽🚀🙈🙉
Nikola Tesla (1856-1943) made dozens of breakthroughs in the production, transmission and application of electric power. When Einstein was asked what it was like to be a genius he replied "I don't know ask Tesla". Tesla wrote "The day science begins to study non physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence." He was interested in Hindu cosmology and philosophy.
San Francisco is the only place you could ever get a straight answer concerning anything out of the ordinary as ESP
I believe there is two things that we are doing whilst we are here, collecting and processing sound and light, the end is product is memories , neither sound, light or memories are made of matter
Memories aren't actually a tangible "thing" though. They are a mental pathway that elicits certain thoughts that are related to your life experience which can range from fleeting or false to as if it happened yesterday. The non-physical part of Memory is instantaneous and mostly subconscious meaning that you aren't in control of it or really even consciously aware of it and it just works. It's Muscle memory and that is why you can do things on auto-pilot and get better at doing at things simply by doing them. Then you have The part of memory which your are directly involved in which is essentially your repertoire of your personal life stories. Not trying to be mean, but no one really cares about your stories. Humans are really good at caring about other people's life story not because, they don't care. I would argue that we are not capable of actually caring. We all want someone to be our friend. A friend that cares about what we have seen, things that happen to us good and bad. Someone who understands what we say and will respond with relevant information, encouragement, and empathy. The problem is that this person simply doesn't exist unless your friends with Jesus. Everyone wants a friend like that, but no one is willing to be that friend. Not normally at all really. IRL when things get too serious or you depend too much. Everyone bounces, every time. People only like hanging out when there is an incentive for them to do so. They like goin' along for the ride as long as they can benefit from it, but if something happens that diminishes their own personal happiness or requires too much time and effort. They won't ever stick around and care to hear your opinions about it later. It's perfectly logical though. Why would you want to spend time doing things you don't like to do or talking about something your not interested in, directly involved with, or effected by? One of the problems with the world is that many people are instinctively selfish in this way. People who have suffered serious trauma in their life very young be it abuse, illness, death of a loved one. get to grow up and society basically says: "Get over it, no one wants to hear it." Try talking about your physically abusive alcoholic father in a job interview. LMAO That is a joke, to be funny, but in reality it's not a joke and that actually happens sometimes and I'm sure even worse than that.
This video is way too philosophical. I appreciated it anyway, as there is always something to think about, but.. You say you seek evidence of ESP, so stop with the "if" questions and enter a debate with your guests, please. You got the oppertunity to talk to Dean Radin, and you ask him about the mechanism of ESP - of which he has stated in other interviews that he isn't sure about - instead of the thing he claims to be sure about, which is the evidence for telepathy and precognition, while moving on to other guests repeating "evidence of ESP is weak, if it's true, ...". If you'd ask him point blank "what is the evidence for ESP?", I'm pretty sure he'll calmly, and soft-spokenly cite it (possibly the papers on his website and his own experiments) and debate you if you wish to drill deeper... Maybe there is such debate video and I missed it?
It kind of reminds me of when I read "The Case For Christ" by Lee Strobel as a freshman in high school. He would ask these supposedly hardball questions, get a two or three paragraph answer from the Christian apologist he was interviewing and then move on as if they had adequately addressed it, which they almost never had (at least based on he ended up including in the book from their interview). I noticed this even while reading it back then, but unfortunately I was still naive enough to be significantly influenced by the propaganda.
Sorry to make that comparison. I love Robert and this show and he's not a huckster like Lee was, so the comparison really has more to do with the form than the content. I think it's more about it being snappy and trying to cover a lot of ground l. I still learn a lot from these videos, but they're higher in the infotainment factor than, say, an in-depth 90 minute interview with one person. Though I guess he's doing that now too (cf. Donald Hoffman).
Fuck, I need to edit my comments before hitting "Reply".
@@sosaysthelegend Yes, let's also take a moment to say positive things. I learn a ton from every video. If the learning is not from the content, then it definitely is from usage of English, language, comparison of arguments, text comprehension, etc. I am thankful for that.
I think I agree with you that Robert Kuhn is trying to cover a lot of ground in most of his interviews. Robert Kuhn can talk abstractly, but he can also go deep. I'm fine with abstract, because a lot of the videos are over my head anyway. But I also like the drilling down he usually does with an unrelenting force (as in, "not softening or yielding in determination") through continuously discussing questions around a topic, over years. I like it: fundamental questions, possibly the same, posed to as many people as possible over years and see wether their answers changed. I don't mind the question "what is consciousness?" being posed a million times. I want all perspectives: every slight difference in phrasing, on something so fundamental, may be crucial.
I also know it's part of his personality to ask "what if" questions continuously. I found a few videos where he does approximately ask "where's your evidence for psi?" to Charles Tart and Stephen Braude, so he's definitely not afraid of asking.
Presently ESP can only be subjectively grasped individually. One cannot explain the experience to another. However, one does know the intrinsic nature of the experience.
I know the evidence is poor but: can elves and gnomes reveal a new reality?
ESP happens all the time, except when you do science.
Pauli would agree.
At least I think he would (have)
At least that's what he thought about synchronicity. Synchronicity and causality are mutually exclusive opposites like life and death and light and dark. But both are needed for a complete picture of existence, like yin-yang.
However, I haven't read enough yet about his views on the topic to know if he would have applied that thinking to all ESP or just synchronicity as such.
vulcanus30 when I meet women for coffee off of dating sites they know what I am thinking.
That's right, you already know all about science because it's you can already see everything in your square box.
It's a paradox. The reality of now is primordial wisdom.
I'm open minded but it's hard to believe he embarked on this senseless journey. When we don't have answers to an unknown phenomenon, if it even exists (which studies have shown no hard evidence for), then Marilyn quickly jumps to the "quantum" explanation. Deepak Chopra is another example of this so-called "woo woo" science. Nothing to see here
Nothing to see for anyone who never had a psi experience. That's what you need to be asking yourself, have I ever had a psi experience? I invariably find that the answer is no, to anyone who doesn't believe in the psi experience. In fact, it's so beyond their scope of personal experiences, that they'll doubt that anyone who's actually had such an experience is telling the truth or they are erroneously recounting their experience for something unrelated to it. It's question begging.
15:53 Laugh as much as you like. If you would see future events of your own life just like I did, it wouldn't be funny anymore. I guess it's just to hard to explain for you. Ain't I'm right?
hahahahahhahah
It's not spooky. Not supernatural. Not religious. Not occult. Not weird. Not mysterious. Not mystical. It's perfectly natural. It is information. And sometimes becomes unconsciously accessible to more than one person at a time. Can you see the earth's magnetic field? Why are you questing if you are determined to be so superior to every answer you find and determined to undermine every answer you encounter; what a waste of time: I stopped watching at 15:54. You will never be any closer to the truth than you are at this instant. Are you open to it. NO.
Ingo Swann gave what I consider to be the best insight into the inquiry about psychic abilities. Ingo was the chief psychic in the remote viewing program at SRI and one of the principle trainers for the Stargate program. He said that the very definition of the scientific method precludes it from being used to study psychic phenomena because the method is for studying matter. Physical matter and its epiphenomena. We need a new scientific method for studying phenomena that are not based in matter.
And on a side note I take issue with the assertion that there's been no evidence produced for the existence of ESP and psychic ability. Not only do we have mass amounts of data showing at least moderate effect sizes, we have individuals who tested exceptionally well under controlled conditions. Call them the psychic All-Stars. I think the people like Alex Tanous are a model for the future of this research. He had one foot in the world of material science and one in the world of psychic experience. We need more researchers to develop their own abilities, and I would start every one of them with remote viewing because it has the most evidence supporting it and a training protocol that anyone can follow.
ESP has strangeness in common with quantum. Could look into if ESP a kind of quantum for consciousness.
Amazing I had the chance to watch this intellectual episode while I was running!
👽👍
Dear Robert, in order to understand what Dean Radin said, from a materialistic view, is absolutely fundamental to let go 2 aspects of our understanding of nature:
1- Mind-matter dualism is incompatible with darwinism. Darwinism means that we were once non-thinkers, so thinking cannot be something inherent of human kind (or ancestor). Abstract thinking is the ability to represent reality "outside" reality, and it is something created by man (for economic and protodiplomatic purposes). The mind is in the brain when considering the target of influences, outside the brain when considering the source of those influences. And it is only possible to exist considering both without causal-temporal order.
2- After realizing that, we need to understand that causality is not a property of reality, but only a property of the stories we tell about some arbitrary choosen parts of reality.
Putting both together, we will understand what he meant about the relational character of reality.
A good analogy would be the collapse of the wave function. It is not a fact, it is probability becaming influences on reality.
Thansk for the great video.
@@johnm.v709 that is precisely my point. It is not two things, but two models. We do not deal with nothing more than models, impregnated by the paradigm that permits us to construct them.
It only took 5 minutes for god to show up.
When you are are looking for a god. You will always find one you like.
👏🏻👏🏻👽
Precognition. I’ve experienced it in dreams
Oh dear. Here we go again. Fred Allan Wolf was the nearest to "IT". He is the Playful Exploring Child . Look at his shirt. All the talking in the world won't get you "There". It has to be experienced.
If we could know one another without the limitations of language operating from the position of love would be first nature as opposed to fear in these confusingly dark times.
Why?
Robert. I love what you do and your channel. You’re an amazing human being man! 😁 this episode surprised me and reignited my passion in this conversational stage of the dialectic. Thank you for what you do and please continue doing it good sir !
Non local aspects of consciousness - science needs to develop a means of dealing with this reality.
To understand ESP, first need learn to understand how part of emotions are connected.
👽👍
The truth is out there
Are you really looking for the truth or just bias confirmation with smoke and mirrors.
I want to believe
@@LeviBulger
I don't want too believe.
I want too be convinced.
I look forward to the future when science and religion will blend together because these two societies seek the ultimate truth of existence.
Imagine the in those days scientist will be Jedis and they'll build a temple.
18:20 It's like trying to get Dustin Hoffmans' character in RAIN MAN to skip Wheel of Fortune or having 8 fish sticks, on Wednesday, at 12:30pm.
Was anything demonstrated in this video?
no. ;p
This channel isn't about demonstrating stuff
i am bored of this reality, badly need new one!
I would make the argument why C.S. Lewis converted to Christianity is because he wanted a new reality. As a great novelist he is good at convincing the readers of new reality’s. Whether the reality is true is not important.
What about the identical twins "communication" paradox? One has psychosis and the other develops symptoms... The one with psychosis gets sedated then other one calms down... How could that be if they are separated by long distances?
Exactly. I have finally realized what is going on here. Our bodies have a certain resonance from each cell. This resonance connects us to the akashic and to each other and our spirit. Twins, naturally have a closer biological resonance with each other because of the DNA. So they pick up more easily "communications" with each other and signals can overlap. A medium, for example, has a wider tuning band naturally, so they can pickup other radio stations as well. Our unique resonance with our spirit is what has been known as the golden cord that can not be broken. Not sure how the ancients knew that. We can thiink of this in technical terms and can study it. It is discover-able from a science perspective. We need better tools.
@@khufu8699 What about quantum field theory? According to QFT, particles are excitations of fields...
@zempathAre you a psychiatrist? If yes, have you treated identical twins where one was diagnosed with schizophrenia and the other was not?
There’s a very simple test that you can take to prove ESP is real;
Have you ever thought of a random acquaintance and then either got a phone call from them or ran into them?
Your answer, I know, is YES. I’ve asked over 1,000 people this same question and NOT ONE has said no. Not one.
Now you could argue that it is simply a coincidence. And yes, that’s possible, but when you bring statistics into it, it is more likely that there is some unseen connection.
Statistics; think of all the people you know. And you thought of just one person. Let’s say you know 300 people. That would make it a 1 in 300 chance that the person you thought of would be the same one you had contact with. 1 in 300 isn’t that huge a stretch. But now take the fact I’ve asked 1,000 people the same question. Add those to the odds and it’s literally next to NO chance that it’s random.
Deen and his team I think have a lot of data to share! Are we ready to listen? 👩🏽🚀🙈🙉
Mind is in a parallel world. Science is still just scratching the surface of physical world.
Mind is in a whole new plane
Trying to prove Mind concepts with current science is like asking Neanderthal to prove relativity
I wonder if only few people could dream at night, what scientific evidence would have been there for natural phenomena of dreaming apart from personal anecdotes?
@Sepheryn Then why not use the same technique to verify telepathy, OBE , precognition etc?
I love how these feel like they came out in 1992
If ESP has or is a form of communication, it would help to learn the language.
Our bodies are measurement devices that I believe limit, or at least severely hamper, what we are capable of thinking about and understanding. As millions of years have passed, we have been given more and more measuring instruments within our bodies allowing us to better understand things around us for our survival.
There was a concrete and definite time in the earth's history where "sight" and "sound" were not things that existed. Waves still had wavelengths, but they meant nothing without an entity that could parse it into something meaningful e.g. "this particular wavelength ("blue") often indicates water that might help me survive." Why waste energy or brainpower on something that doesn't help you? I can't imagine how it would be possible to understand the electromagnetic spectrum if you were an organism without ears or eyes. That had no relevance to your existence if you were a cell that just lived in a world of bumping into other small things so you wouldn't have needed to be able to imagine or measure waves. Could it be possible that there are properties that similarly don't confer any survival benefit and our brains just aren't equipped to parse some information that is passing through us every second?
In "The Case Against Reality" by Donald Hoffman, he talks about how, from the standpoint of evolutionary game theory, there is a mathematical probability of zero that organisms will get selected for which are capable of seeing the entire objective truth of reality. He often gives the example of a computer desktop. What's on a screen is the representation of all the bits and circuits in the computer, and by just manipulating an interface, we can make it do what we desire without having to work with the millions of transistors. Imagine if you had to send an email without the monitor, flipping each of those millions of switches one at a time. You would never get anything done, and in the same way, we're just given shortcuts to things that affect our ability to survive and reproduce. What if all we have in our hands to measure is the monitor, and the computer itself is hidden away from us?
I dislike any traditionally "supernatural" ideas like ghosts, telepathy, clairvoyance all that but I feel very safe in believing that there is nonetheless a layer that we don't have access to and it seems like there's really strange happenings in causality at times. Humans are bad at probability and all that, but I'd say at least once every two weeks, I see really bizarre similarities line up between entirely unrelated things. I was playing factorio a couple weeks ago while listening to an interview with Biden. In that game, you have to manage air pollution or you get attacked by alien bugs and at the precise moment I started building a wall around my base, I heard Biden give a metaphor to the interviewer that was something like "you can't build a wall high enough around your house to stop the pollution" on a subject *completely* unrelated to that. That type of thing happens constantly and I'm sure most people can point out similar things so it just makes me wonder if there are indeed hidden connections of some sort
I enjoy the videos in this series that AREN’T about religion
The name of this show is ironic since not a single episode gets us any closer to any truth. It should be called, Lots of Questions We Can't Answer (but have opinions on anyway).
If Narnia is real then whole new wardrobes of space will be opened up!
if you're a skeptic, you've never had an experience (or several). it's as simple as that. conventional science will never capture it, it is not all-encompassing. our thirst for "evidence" is the reason why our world only accepts what can be measured.
ESP is real...all have the ability, just not all use it consciously or is aware. Telepathy is real as well...etc.. When you live it it's normal. If you don't then that's normal for you. I've not visited Africa so I don't know for fact it's a real country...I take the word of 6hose who have been there. Please, take my word, there's more than the 5 physical senses.
Only the Miles Davis album. It’s a hell of an experience.
👏🏻👽
I know for fact that telepathy is real & that physics that have a real gift have shown me my future before & this was a true revelation in my life as skeptic..My story is more then relevant to that realm.
ESP is a form of new reality. It is one level of that reality. A higher reality is what we currently call channeling however, there are even higher forms along these same lines. They ALL have to do with projection of consciousness.
It is depressing to see someone who seems to be so hard core in terms of wanting “scientific proof” unwilling to try (rather than just speak about) fairly known practices which would give him a direct (albeit a bit subjective perhaps) experience of what he seems to be wanting to know. Lucid dreaming, Out of Body experiences, remote viewing, info-vision, and telekinesis... there are good teachers and centres in the USA and around the world where he could perfectly go with an open mind and give them a good try. Instead he just constantly dismisses the words of the people being interviewed.... what a wanker! Just go and give them a good honest try... your world would change for the better and your materialistic world view will be a thing of the past.
We're stuck in a localized infinite bubble and we have no idea why.
I feel exactly same
What ?
Why is it fair to investigate ESP on an equal basis to other phenomena when the ESP ability has atrophied in most people due to their being disconnected from the environment? ESP originally arises from a connection to the environment. This is where the study should be directed. Get mankind to connect with his environment and more evidence of ESP will surface as the ability reactivates. ESP used to exist more in the past, which is why it now exists as a curiosity to modern man. Modern life has distanced people in general from ESP capabilities, and old, shriveled Scientists studying ESP is an oxymoron (nothing against the Noetic Science institute, though). Of course, their approach is mental, detached and flawed. The investigation should be done with people in their 20's, who naturally have more connection to source energies, and young spiritually oriented people who maintain a connection to their energy flow.
"Secrets stollen, from deep inside" - Cindy Lauper
👏🏻👏🏻👽
Wow Robert, try having an open mind.
truth is stranger than truth.
Space-Time is DEAD. Just face the facts...
Awesome👍👍
This has always been a normal part of my life.
👽👍
Is the Materialistic Paradigm Right? The clear answer for more than 100 years is - no! We need to find new answers...
Don't you think if there was concrete evidence behind this we wouldn't already know about it universally
Presupposes that the rules for examining materialistic phenomenon must be followed for non-materialistic phenomenon. The rules of math are not the same as the rules of logic nor the rules of ethics. No one argues that 2+2 must equal 4 for the greater good. The proposition would be seen as nonsense.
ESP = can’t prove it, measure it, test it, see it, trust it.
OK, lets talk about dark matter/energy…..
If this guy's thinks an atom is mostly empty space in 2020 he surely must be outdated! Everyone knows these days that the atom is actually made of this cloud called the wave function! This cloud is not empty space for sure!
Sweet
Fred's truth simply floated over your cynical, skeptical, science-bound bubble / cone of silence. You will never get closer to the Truth because your mind is closed.
Say the mind creates the senses, over time, to conceive an experience of the universe through life, how might we know to construct a sense based on what we cannot perceive due to a lack of experience? I hope my question is a valid key.
👽👍
App User: "There's a bug."
Software Developer: "Sorry, can't make it happen. There's no bug."
I'd like to see materlists explain why a radioactive nucleus decay is suppressed by the act of observation....
Unfortunately she has no ESP,...and neither does he
👽👍
I know or can feel when people I know approach me or are near at times
👽👍
See Rupert Sheldrake and morphic resonance.
Don't be writing that we want the sceptics to stay sceptical.
The question is would there ever be enough supportive data to ever convince lifelong skeptics of the phenomena.
I think not because they will just explain it away with something.
I’m hoping statistical analysis will so the trick…… I don’t have any other ideas.
they will know it when they experience it
I spose meta-ontology works now that it is 2023. Except we should be aware that ESP can be hyjacked by algorithms. It will be better to know how to discern the difference between a manufactured insight versus an emerging value ... but then wouldn't ESP be something of a tracking system in the physical with similar or relevant correlation to a temporal timeline?
Love ur journey
Right there with you
Science is exscience and payeence is science.
Arent these the guys from “What the bleep”?
👽👍
I like how you keep an open mind. Perhaps you and I shall meet one day.
3:34 Tapping or tuning into higher consciousness, consciousness, reels, tapes, feeds, network through the force through further levels of awareness.
The "presentiment" effect pioneered by Radin and Bierman years ago has in fact been multiply reproduced in other labs and is robust. Darryl Bem has found a related effect (though reproduction has not been as straightfoward). Other examples, such as the world wide EGG statistical project and retrocognitive remote viewing (including voluminous governmental data) have been shown to rise FAR above noise level, but just a thorough review of the presentiment data alone will be enough to break the spell of "no evidence" proclamations. The problem is in getting those with bias against (or fear of?) to slow down and fairly review the data and the replications without over-weighting the non-replications. This takes deep, patient effort. Cold fusion (aka, LENR) serves as an illustrative, parallel example - after the many rocks thrown, tar and feathers applied, pioneers wounded, the scientific community has now been forced to accept and study. There are many hide-bound physicists unhappy about it still, but that field is progressing now; new paradigms are worth the effort and courage required.