First of all secularism was never an original part of the Indian constitution. Moreover Secularism means separating government from religion. It doesn't mean inclusion of all.
No, you are completely wrong. India is a secular country and only the word "Secular" has been added, elements of secularism such as Fundamental Rights under Article 25-28 that is Religious Freedom and Right to Equality under Article 14 were present since inception of the constitution. So you see, India was a secular country in its spirit even before the word was added. The Supreme Court also upheld it and commented that the Indian constitution was secular in its spirit and termed it as one of the "Basic Features of the constitution. and Moreover, secularism in the Indian context does not imply a strict separation between religion and the state, as in some Western models. Instead, it embraces the principle of "sarva dharma sambhava," meaning equal respect for all religions. This unique approach ensures that the state treats all religions with equal respect and does not favor or discriminate against any faith. India's secularism is inclusive, allowing individuals the freedom to practice, propagate, and profess their religion while ensuring that religious practices do not infringe upon public order, morality, or the rights of others. Therefore, your interpretation of secularism as exclusionary and limited to the separation of religion and state does not align with the Indian model, which harmonizes religious diversity within its democratic framework.
@_._LS_._ advocating self narrated definitions doesn't change facts. Secularism isn't a term requiring independent interpretations suiting ones own narrative. First of all the term in itself is western with no connection to the Indian subcontinent.
@@thedecadecalled90s64 While secularism has Western origins India adapted it to suit its diversity Here it means equal respect for all religions not strict separation This is a constitutional principle affirmed by the Supreme Court as a Basic Feature reflecting India’s inclusive and diverse nature not a self-made narrative.
He was the one who made nonsense comments about Vedas, He has forgotten that those whom he want to save, had kicked his generations from Iran, & it were our great valiant Hindu forefather who allowed them to stay here and practise their religion, Now when we are re emerging he has problem! He is trying to save those who were blood suckers of his forefathers, now he is paying back debt to them! Dont worry we would continue to reclaim! Each n every inch of our land.
It is not your valiant forefather Hindus ..Hindu is a Farsi word.. You have no identity, everything that you do you eat you wear the so called culture is the gift of others ..Hindu Hindu you chant is a word from farsi ...you will be shocked to know the meaning ..😂
@@theeagle4877 that is utter misconception anyways our Shastras do have usage of word in Hindu in Vivid medani, Kalika puran, madhavadigviajya, Leave that, you don't need to sermon me who we were, even if I accept your proposition that we called ourselves Sanatan Dharmis earlier, later on word Hindu was used by us, still the culture essence was intact when Invasions were happening in Iran!
@@theeagle4877 ar baat rahi shanti doot m@d@sa chap pottasium Oxide (K2O) ki tumhay baap dadao se pucho wo kaun the 5 peedi phle pta chl jaega! Isiliye hmara astitv puchne se phle apna jaan kr aa, jinki dhoti phli fati unhe salvar pehna!
He has enough understanding that prevents him from acting like a bigot. Persia has parsis even today, and those who left had left for reasons other than the threat of destruction. And most Muslims are of this land, so to say it's your land is not only unconstitutional but unhistorical as well.
So today i Reliaze why people attack openly the harmony of. Kerela.. sometimes shows 72 horain,sometimes another false story.. Bec kerela place..where people speaks damm clear truth openly. Thanks sir
Impossible, scrap the Places of Worship act, reclaim all the lost, encroached destroyed temples and hand it over to Hindus and leave peacefully. Or the Honourable judge should give up his place, but for his power he wouldn’t be able to save his own place of some goon ever attacked them and encroached upon their property.
Do you know how many Buddhist temple has been destroyed to built the now temples - shall we go back to those days where there was Buddhist temple existed as per your logic. This is again majoritarian mindset which is same as Hitler’s mindset on Jews. RSS is taking India to 1800s through BJP where Manushastra was followed and Brahmins were enjoying supremacy and committed all kinds of crimes and sins in the name of religion and Manushastra. May be you also belong to those category of people.
Even if it's not possible to scrap the Act For a scientific mind, we have every right to know what was under that soil. Scientific pursuit is more important than any religion.
Hats off to you with folded hands for your analysis and comments sir 🎉🎉🎉
Excellent. Same is my opinion. If the 1991 Act is quashed by SC, we can expect the worst. All wellwishers should support Nariman sahab.
Personalities like Nariman should approach the apex court to restore the peace and harmony in the country
First of all secularism was never an original part of the Indian constitution. Moreover Secularism means separating government from religion. It doesn't mean inclusion of all.
No, you are completely wrong.
India is a secular country and only the word "Secular" has been added, elements of secularism such as Fundamental Rights under Article 25-28 that is Religious Freedom and Right to Equality under Article 14 were present since inception of the constitution.
So you see, India was a secular country in its spirit even before the word was added. The Supreme Court also upheld it and commented that the Indian constitution was secular in its spirit and termed it as one of the "Basic Features of the constitution.
and Moreover, secularism in the Indian context does not imply a strict separation between religion and the state, as in some Western models. Instead, it embraces the principle of "sarva dharma sambhava," meaning equal respect for all religions. This unique approach ensures that the state treats all religions with equal respect and does not favor or discriminate against any faith.
India's secularism is inclusive, allowing individuals the freedom to practice, propagate, and profess their religion while ensuring that religious practices do not infringe upon public order, morality, or the rights of others. Therefore, your interpretation of secularism as exclusionary and limited to the separation of religion and state does not align with the Indian model, which harmonizes religious diversity within its democratic framework.
@_._LS_._ advocating self narrated definitions doesn't change facts. Secularism isn't a term requiring independent interpretations suiting ones own narrative. First of all the term in itself is western with no connection to the Indian subcontinent.
@@thedecadecalled90s64
While secularism has Western origins India adapted it to suit its diversity Here it means equal respect for all religions not strict separation This is a constitutional principle affirmed by the Supreme Court as a Basic Feature reflecting India’s inclusive and diverse nature not a self-made narrative.
@_._LS_._ you keep on insisting on this, kindly quote in exact terms where is it documented. Note no interpretation or what you believe.
@@interstellar104 are kehna kya chate ho, the debate is what is secularism, agar pta Hai to btao.
Saluting this Hon'ble!
Judicial Reforms needed.
we thanks justice Nariman for defending 1991 places of worship act which will definitely bring peace and harmony in our country
Very very true
Thanks sir
Very good
You're the Best 🎯
He was the one who made nonsense comments about Vedas,
He has forgotten that those whom he want to save, had kicked his generations from Iran,
& it were our great valiant Hindu forefather who allowed them to stay here and practise their religion,
Now when we are re emerging he has problem!
He is trying to save those who were blood suckers of his forefathers, now he is paying back debt to them!
Dont worry we would continue to reclaim! Each n every inch of our land.
It is not your valiant forefather Hindus ..Hindu is a Farsi word.. You have no identity, everything that you do you eat you wear the so called culture is the gift of others ..Hindu Hindu you chant is a word from farsi ...you will be shocked to know the meaning ..😂
@@theeagle4877 that is utter misconception anyways our Shastras do have usage of word in Hindu in Vivid medani, Kalika puran, madhavadigviajya,
Leave that, you don't need to sermon me who we were, even if I accept your proposition that we called ourselves Sanatan Dharmis earlier, later on word Hindu was used by us, still the culture essence was intact when Invasions were happening in Iran!
@@theeagle4877 ar baat rahi shanti doot m@d@sa chap pottasium Oxide (K2O) ki tumhay baap dadao se pucho wo kaun the 5 peedi phle pta chl jaega!
Isiliye hmara astitv puchne se phle apna jaan kr aa, jinki dhoti phli fati unhe salvar pehna!
Madarsachhap@@theeagle4877
He has enough understanding that prevents him from acting like a bigot. Persia has parsis even today, and those who left had left for reasons other than the threat of destruction. And most Muslims are of this land, so to say it's your land is not only unconstitutional but unhistorical as well.
Plain speaking and good sense!
Horrible situation arrived.
Judicial Reform is necessary 💀💀
Go and do that in bangladesh 😂
भैया मंदिर तोड़ने से पहले क्यों नहीं सोचा ये सब , सांप्रदायिक वैमनस्यता होगी, 😂😂
भारत रत्न अगर चाहिए तो समझा जा सकता हैं ।
How non Hindu judge can appreciate Sumpre court judgment of RAMA Temple judgment.
5 pages of the judgement of Ayodhya Babri Masjid need to be religiously followed.
I want to correct justice Nariman for quote that he mentioned in his speech that Janus is a Roman God not a Greek
So today i Reliaze why people attack openly the harmony of. Kerela.. sometimes shows 72 horain,sometimes another false story..
Bec kerela place..where people speaks damm clear truth openly.
Thanks sir
😂really
5 pages from the Ayodhya judgement is a classic. Is it?
Impossible, scrap the Places of Worship act, reclaim all the lost, encroached destroyed temples and hand it over to Hindus and leave peacefully. Or the Honourable judge should give up his place, but for his power he wouldn’t be able to save his own place of some goon ever attacked them and encroached upon their property.
Yes and the Hindus must give it to Buddhists. Because hindus broke Buddhist and Jain temples and built upon them
Do you know how many Buddhist temple has been destroyed to built the now temples - shall we go back to those days where there was Buddhist temple existed as per your logic. This is again majoritarian mindset which is same as Hitler’s mindset on Jews. RSS is taking India to 1800s through BJP where Manushastra was followed and Brahmins were enjoying supremacy and committed all kinds of crimes and sins in the name of religion and Manushastra. May be you also belong to those category of people.
Not only this sir ask him why Parsis were kicked out of Iran and why did they take refuge in India!
Even if it's not possible to scrap the Act
For a scientific mind, we have every right to know what was under that soil.
Scientific pursuit is more important than any religion.
@@PiyushMani-dr1hy You're living in a fools paradise. History is not black or white.. its in gray area cannot be looked from binary thinking.
Sanghis comments will be like - this fellow is anti hindu and he should be charged with sedition as he spoke aganist SC judgement
Good orator with empty mind
Should not speak on subject which one knows or understands enough, applying learning not applicable is fangerous much
Does they hv respect towards Hinduism?